Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    Universiti Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Institute of Chemical & Bioengineering Technology

    Uploaded by

    The Errorist
    This document provides the criteria and rubric for evaluating an assignment submission. It will be evaluated based on 5 criteria: introduction and definition, content, conclusions, organization and format, and references. Each criteria is scored from 1-5, with 5 being excellent. The total possible score is 50 marks. Clear and convincing introduction, inclusion of all relevant information, conclusions reached, proper formatting and citations will result in higher scores.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Universiti Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Institute of Chemical & Bioengineering Technology

    Uploaded by

    The Errorist
    14 views2 pages
    This document provides the criteria and rubric for evaluating an assignment submission. It will be evaluated based on 5 criteria: introduction and definition, content, conclusions, organization and format, and references. Each criteria is scored from 1-5, with 5 being excellent. The total possible score is 50 marks. Clear and convincing introduction, inclusion of all relevant information, conclusions reached, proper formatting and citations will result in higher scores.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    rubric.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides the criteria and rubric for evaluating an assignment submission. It will be evaluated based on 5 criteria: introduction and definition, content, conclusions, organization and format, and references. Each criteria is scored from 1-5, with 5 being excellent. The total possible score is 50 marks. Clear and convincing introduction, inclusion of all relevant information, conclusions reached, proper formatting and citations will result in higher scores.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    14 views2 pages

    Universiti Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Institute of Chemical & Bioengineering Technology

    Uploaded by

    The Errorist
    This document provides the criteria and rubric for evaluating an assignment submission. It will be evaluated based on 5 criteria: introduction and definition, content, conclusions, organization and format, and references. Each criteria is scored from 1-5, with 5 being excellent. The total possible score is 50 marks. Clear and convincing introduction, inclusion of all relevant information, conclusions reached, proper formatting and citations will result in higher scores.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR

    MALAYSIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL & BIOENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY

    Assignment (CLO3)
    CBB 30503

    TITLE :

    NAME:

    DATE OF SUBMISSION :
    The following criteria is used as the basis for evaluation of the report on a scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high) according to the rubrics in the
    table below.
    Score Ranking
    Item Assessed Unacceptable Acceptable Good Very Good Excellent Total
    (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Score
    Introduction No clear introduction The introduction is The introduction is The introduction clearly The introduction clearly and
    Definition of the main topic partly clear and clearly and and convincingly convincingly discussed and
    X2
    Brief Introduction on states the main topic adequately discussed discussed. grabs the reader’s attention.
    the topic the main topic
    Content Some missing Some missing Most of the All of the informations are All of the informations are
     Present and informations. informations. informations are available. Information is available. Information is
    future of Information may not Information is available. Information relevant and accurate. relevant and accurate.
    biopharmaceutical be relevant. Not generally relevant but is generally relevant Statements are clearly Statement are clearly
    clearly explained. not clearly explained. and clearly explained. explained and generally explained and well supported X5
     Potential Cause
     Other relevant supported with diagrams. with diagrams.
    informations

    Conclusions No conclusion is made A conclusion is made Some conclusions Some conclusions are Some conclusions are
    are reached but not reached and accurate reached, accurate and well
    that accurate presented.
    Organization and Not follow format. Not Partially follow Follow format of Follow format of writing; Follow format of writing; all
    format well organized. format. Contents writing; all needed all needed sections needed sections present.
    Contents show lack of show enough of sections present. present. Well organized Excellent organized and easily
    knowledge. knowledge but still a Well organized. and easily followed. followed. Contents show full
    few concept and Contents show Contents show full excellent knowledge of
    ideas are loosely enough knowledge of knowledge of subject. subject.
    connected. subject.
    References No citation in text Some citations in text A few citations in text All citations in text are All citations in text are
    are not available in are not available in available in list of available in list of reference
    list of reference. list of reference. reference and follow the format

    TOTAL (50 marks)

    You might also like