Metamaterial Slabs Covered UWB Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna
Metamaterial Slabs Covered UWB Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna
Metamaterial Slabs Covered UWB Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna
1536-1225 © 2017 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
2944 IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL. 16, 2017
Fig. 3. Simulated (a) S 1 1 , and (b) gain of the AVA and MSAVA. far-field performances at high frequencies stand for the limits
of bandwidth.
hand, the waves propagating along the slabs owning same phase
velocity result in smooth wavefront at the antenna aperture. The B. Metamaterial Unit Cell
advantage of this technique is to maintain the overall length of In order to design a proper unit cell (UC), which has a high
the antenna unchanged, while effectively enhancing the antenna permittivity property, a modified parallel-line (PL) structure in
gain. As concluded in [17], the high-permittivity slab with thin [8] is employed. The PL UC is printed on the Rogers RO4350B
thickness could achieve good performance. Metamaterials can substrate with a relative permittivity of 3.48 and a thickness of
be equivalent to homogeneous materials. Thus, the alternative 0.101 mm. The equivalent intrinsic parameter of the UC, i.e.,
to realize the concept of dielectric slabs covered Vivaldi antenna permittivity, was calculated using the inversion algorithm based
is to use the metamaterial. The metamaterial serves to reduce on Kramer–Krong relationship [18]. As shown in Fig. 4(a), the
the thickness of the slabs, cost, and weight. S-parameters of the PL are obtained on HFSS by assigning
the perfect electric conductor and perfect magnetic conductor
A. AVA Design boundary conditions in the yoz and xoz planes, respectively, and
two wave ports are located in z-direction. Fig. 4(b) illustrates
The geometry of a conventional AVA is demonstrated in the simulated S-parameters of the PL UC with different length.
Fig. 2. The AVA is printed on a Rogers RO4003C 0.508 mm The effective permittivity of the PL is illustrated in Fig. 4(c).
thick substrate (dielectric constant of 3.38 and loss tangent In fact, the effective permittivity of the PL UC is larger than
of 0.0027) with total size (l × w) of 60 × 40 mm2 . The AVA 1.7 over the nonresonant frequency range, which is larger than
consists of three major parts: an elliptically tapered ground; a effective permittivity of the unprinted dielectric slab (i.e., 1.13).
wm = 1.19 mm microstrip feedline matching the 50 Ω coaxial It is important to mention that the working bandwidth of the UC
line; as well as two dual exponentially tapered radiators printed should be far from its resonant frequency for reducing the loss.
on the opposite sides of the substrate. The end of the microstrip
line is linearly tapered in order to facilitate assembly with the
2.4 mm connector. The other geometrical parameters were op- C. AVA With Metamaterial Slab (MSAVA)
timized by genetic algorithm in order to achieve good reflection The proposed MSAVA is illustrated in Fig. 1. Two pieces
coefficients S11 at low frequencies. The values are given as fol- of meta-slabs made of M × N array of PL unit cells are sym-
lows: ws = 22 mm, lo = 30 mm, ls = 15 mm, r2 = 11.64 mm, metrically placed at a height of mh from the AVA. According
r1 = 19.4 mm, and lg = 20 mm. to the mechanism of AVA, the EM fields mainly radiate in the
The simulated S11 and gain of the AVA are shown in Fig. 3. It tapered slot region. The results in Fig. 5(a) confirm that the
can be observed that the AVA has a broad impedance bandwidth length ml = N × dz of the meta-slab should not be smaller
from 3.74 to more than 44 GHz, and a slight mismatch occurs than that of the tapered slot length for adequate sucking energy
between 5 and 6.25 GHz with S11 <–9.5 dB. However, the re- from the tapered slot and the flare termination. Fig. 5(b) shows
sults in Fig. 3(b) indicate that the main beam of the AVA does the width mw = M × dx of the meta-slab is close to the width
not point towards the axial direction of the tapered slot (z-axis) of tapered slot to ensure effective energy focusing. Parametric
above 34 GHz. It also can be found that the maximum gain of simulations have been carried out to reveal the impacts of height
the AVA is less than 11.4 dBi. Additionally, the boresight gain mh on boresight gain of the MSAVA. We can see in Fig. 6(a)
decreases dramatically at high frequencies. Note that the poor that larger height contributes to higher gain, yet only in a narrow
LI et al.: METAMATERIAL SLABS COVERED UWB ANTIPODAL VIVALDI ANTENNA 2945
Fig. 9. Measured and simulated (a) reflection coefficient S 1 1 , and (b) gain.
REFERENCES
[1] A. Dadgarpour, B. Zarghooni, B. S. Virdee, and T. A. Denidni,
“Millimeter-wave high-gain SIW end-fire bow-tie antenna,” IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 2337–2342, May 2015.
[2] W. Cao, B. Zhang, A. Liu, T. Yu, D. Guo, and Y. Wei, “Broadband high-
gain periodic endfire antenna by using I-shaped resonator (ISR) struc-
tures,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 11, pp. 1470–1473,
2012.
[3] D. Ramaccia, F. Scattone, F. Bilotti, and A. Toscano, “Broadband com-
pact horn antennas by using EPS-ENZ metamaterial lens,” IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 2929–2937, Jun. 2013.
[4] M. Moosazadeh, S. Kharkovsky, J. T. Case, and B. Samali, “Miniaturized
UWB antipodal Vivaldi antenna and its application for detection of void
inside concrete specimens,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 16,
pp. 1317–1320, 2017.
[5] I. T. Nassar and T. M. Weller, “A novel method for improving antipodal
Vivaldi antenna performance,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 63,
no. 7, pp. 3321–3324, Jul. 2015.
[6] B. Zhou, H. Li, X. Y. Zou, and T. J. Cui, “Broadband and high-
gain planar Vivaldi antennas based on inhomogeneous anistropic zero-
Fig. 10. Normalized E-plane radiation patterns. index metamaterial,” Prog. Electromagn. Res., vol. 120, pp. 235–247,
2011.
[7] A. R. H. Alhawari, A. Ismail, M.A. Mahdi, and R. S. A. R. Abdullah, “An-
tipodal Vivaldi antenna performance booster exploiting sung-in negative
index metamaterial,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. C, vol. 27, pp. 265–279,
2012.
[8] L. Chen, Z. Y. Lei, R. Yang, J. Fan, and X. W. Shi, “A broadband artificial
material for gain enhancement of antipodal tapered slot antenna," IEEE
Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 395–400, Jan. 2015.
[9] X. X. Li, G. Liu, Y. M. Zhang, L. Sang, and G. Q. Lv, “A compact
multi-layer phase correcting lens to improve directive radiation of Vivaldi
antenna,” Int. J. RF Micro. Comput.-Aided Eng., vol. 27, no. 7, 2017, Art.
no. e21109.
[10] G. K. Pandey, H. S. Singh, and M. K. Meshram, “Meander-line-based
inhomogeneous anisotropic artificial material for gain enhancement of
UWB Vivaldi antenna,” Appl. Phys. A, vol. 122, pp. 122–134, 2016.
[11] A. S. Arezoomand, R. A. Sadeghzadeh, and M. N. Moghadasi, “Novel
techniques in tapered slot antenna for linearity phase center and
gain enhancement,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 16,
pp. 270–273, 2017.
[12] G. Teni, N. Zhang, J. Qiu, and P. Zhang, “Research on a novel miniatur-
ized antipodal Vivaldi antenna with improved radiation,” IEEE Antennas
Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 12, pp. 417–420, 2013.
[13] M. Amiri, F. Tofigh, A. G. Yazdi, and M. Abolhasan, “Exponential an-
tipodal Vivaldi antenna with exponential dielectric lens,” IEEE Antennas
Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 16, pp. 1792–1795, 2017.
[14] J. Puskely, J. Lacik, Z. Raida, and H. Arthaber, “High-gain dielectric-
loaded Vivaldia antenna for Ka-band application,” IEEE Antennas Wire-
less Propag. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 2004–2007, 2016.
[15] Y. W. Wang, G. M. Wang, and B. F. Zong, “Directivity improvement
of Vivaldi antenna using double-slot structure,” IEEE Antennas Wireless
Propag. Lett., vol. 12, pp. 1380–1383, 2013.
[16] D. Ramaccia et al., “Exploiting intrinsic dispersion of metamaterials for
Fig. 11. Normalized H-plane radiation patterns. designing broadband aperture antennas: Theory and experimental verifi-
cation,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 1141–1146,
Mar. 2016.
[17] X. X. Li, B. J. Lu, L. Sang, Y. M. Zhang, and G. Q. Lv, “Radiation
IV. CONCLUSION enhanced Vivaldi antenna with shaped dielectric cover,” Microw. Opt.
Technol. Lett., vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 1975–1983, 2017.
High-permittivity meta-slabs are used to realize a high gain, [18] Z. Szabo, G. H. Park, R. Hedge, and E. P. Lil, “A unique extraction of
directed beam, and stable radiation patterns AVA in the fre- metamaterial parameters based on Kramers–Kronig relationship,” IEEE
quency bandwidth of 3.68–43.5 GHz (11.8:1). The meta-slabs Trans. Microw. Theory, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 2646–2653, Oct. 2010.