CSR Assignment PDF
CSR Assignment PDF
CSR Assignment PDF
TATA, ITC
It is most essential that above all the mentioned activities that a company reports as
contribution to the society , proper check of implementation is taken care of regarding the
working, policies, product, etc. of the company. The major drawbacks of this company which
violates the rule of CSR are:
Nestle believes that water is the lifeline for the people of the society and yet Nestlé’s
water workers were denied the right to water.
Nestle’s response to crisis situation by instant closure of factories and mass
redundancies which can also be seen as illegal mass dismissals.
Restricting trade union rights through fake supervisors.
Discrimination through unfair wages.
The company is believed to be falsely claiming “global policy” as the reason for not
negotiating with the unions.
It has been exploiting developing countries for many years by lying about global policy
on shift patterns.
Excessive working hours in violation of the law.
Interfering in trade union elections.
Coercing workers to stop the registration of a union.
Refusing the basic right to negotiate wages.
Banning the basic right to freedom of assembly.
Nestle is now a serial offender when it comes to violating international conventions and
guidelines.
Also the most recent case of MAGGI in India has violated the role of CSR to the society
by compromising with the health of its customers.
Tata Steel is the second biggest steel manufacturer in Europe and has its main
steelmaking plants in the UK and Holland. It supplies steel and associated services to
major businesses, such as real estate constructors, vehicle manufacturer and packaging.
The European processes are a subsidiary of Tata Steel Group, one of the world’s top ten
steel manufacturers. There are 80 thousand employees working in this system. There
are certain laws which the group has to follow. To avoid this, it has put the systems in
place to meet into the international standards for environmental management such as
ISO14001. But it has not yet come into the effect.
Also it is not working with full transparency as it has been seen that TCS has allegedly
stolen the health software from an American company, Epic Systems, for which
Wisconsin federal has charged $940 million penalty( in April 2016).
The unethical case has been reported, in which the land of Singur farmers is being
overtaken by TATA group for its installation of new Nano factory plant. This led to large
amount of dislocation to local people. Upon discussion it was suggested to shift to
Gujarat.
Indica, the TATA product is also under the conflict of creating pollution as well as a
weird noise pollution as mentioned in the case study.
The main product of the ITC is tobacco. ITC refers to Imperial Tobacco Company of India
Limited. It is fascinating that a business that is now so involved in branding continues to
use its original name, despite the deleterious relationship of tobacco with poor health
and untimely death.
For the financial sustainability of FMCG the group is still dependent on its tobacco
revenues. Tobacco based products (Cigarettes) production covers around 47% of the
total turnover of the company and contributes 80% to the profit of the company. Thus it
can be said that that ITC is subsidizing other FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) from
the money earning from the tobacco product which is unethical.
ITC can be seen as using the CSR as an advertisement for the selling of its goods. The
consumer buys its product classmate because companies say that on every purchase
company will contribute a specific amount for welfare. It is actually impacting the mind
of the buyer and even if the buyer has an option which is cheaper than the classmate
than also he is buying the classmate. The question arises here whether the company is
paying for the welfare or the customer.