Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Definition of Curriculum

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Definition of curriculum

Across literature, numerous definitions of curriculum have been described. This is so because
authors either do not agree with the existing ones or want to add their experiences to the
definition (Porteli, 1987). Numerous curriculum critics have given their opinions on this subject.
There are some which unfortunately “focus only on certain facets of early curriculum thought
while ignoring other” (Hlebowitsh, 1993) while others concentrate only on same characteristics
of curriculum (Toombs and Tierney, 1993). Furthermore, curriculum can be described as broad
or narrow (Oliva, 2008). According to McTighe & Wiggins (2012), a curriculum is a selected
blueprint derived from content and performance standards used for learning. It is the effective
transformation of materials for learning and teaching purpose. “All aspects of the planning,
implementation and evaluations of an educational process, the why, how and how well together
with the teaching-learning process is the curriculum and learning should be experiential,
physical, sensory, eventful, memorable and engage the whole personality of the learner”, Finney
(2002). In other words, a curriculum is a group of specifically chosen lessons used for teaching.
According to Richards (2013), curriculum is “the overall plan or design for a course and how the
content for a course is transformed into a blueprint for teaching and learning which enables the
desired learning outcomes to be achieved”.

Cheng (1994) described curriculum as “a set of activities and content planned at the individual
level, the programme level, or the whole school level to foster teachers’ teaching and students’
learning. To this Nordin (1991) and Marsh and Willis (1998) explain that relevant activities and
content can foster desirable experiences in the students towards the targeted goals. On the other
hand, Selveraj (2010) describes curriculum as “specific subjects or topics within the curriculum
of any learning institution”. Similarly Ramparsad (2001) describe curriculum as “a result of the
interaction of objectively developed plans …created by teachers for the benefit of students, as
well as for the better implementation of the plan. However, the plan is not the blueprint for
student learning rather the strategy for curriculum development”. These are not in the same line
with McTighe and Wiggins.

Purkey and Smith (1998) describe curriculum as three dimensions which are namely:
1. The “intended or planned curriculum”, the one produced by the developers or written
curriculum ( Saylor et al., 1981;Mameyer 2003).
2. The “implemented curriculum”, the one delivered in class,
3. The “attained or realized curriculum”, the one learnt by the students. It is made up of the
experiential and learned curriculum. While the former includes knowledge acquired
through learning experiences, the latter refers to everything the student learns in direct
contact with teaching and the learning process. The former is also referred to as the
hidden curriculum and encloses everything the student learns outside the classroom but
within the school premises.

The Standard Curriculum for Primary Schools (SCPS) also describes curriculum as three
dimensions, namely:

1. “ Written curriculum”, program stating what the teacher should teach,


2. “ Taught curriculum”, depicts the “knowledge acquired, skills developed, and values
inculcated in the student”
3. “Examined curriculum”, describes “knowledge, skills and values which are tested”.
However, these three dimensions are not in line with what Purkey and Smith describe
whereby curriculum is related merely to the different stakeholder unlike an amalgam of
stakeholders and educational event as speculated by the SCPS.

You might also like