Baxter Excerpt Chapter1
Baxter Excerpt Chapter1
Baxter Excerpt Chapter1
The Gospels are real books. They were not written in the heat of the
moment, as at least some of the letters were. There is a sense in which
we may say that the Gospels 'grew'. They were developed over a
number of years to meet the preaching and teaching needs of the
Church. Probably there were several editions of all of them, before the
final editions which have come down to us. We could compare them
with this book, which began as teaching notes. The teaching notes were
revised, and some of them revised again. Then, because of a need, a
I
WHY THE GOSPELS WERE WRITTEN
book was planned. A first draft was written, then a second draft. The
one book was divided into two books, and finally they have been
published. Once that has happened there is no more need for the
teaching notes, or for the earlier drafts of a book, and they can be
thrown away. Writing a book is entirely different from writing a letter.
A CHANGING SITUAT?ON
The first Christians had no need of written accounts of Jesus's life. They
had known Him. They had seen Him die, and then had experienced His
risen presence. The people who heard the first disciples preach and were
baptized also had no need of such accounts. They heard about Jesus
from those who had known Him. The apostles were with them all the
time, and they provided a living contact with Jesus. All of those very
early Christians were waiting impatiently for Jesus to return and judge
the world. So they were busy proclaiming the gospel to others before
His expected coming. They had no time to spend writing down what He
had said and done.
As the years went by, however, the situation gradually changed.
1. THE RAPID SPREAD OF THE CHURCH
As the good news about Jesus spread beyond Palestine into the towns
and villages of the Roman Empire, it was no longer possible for every
new Christian to be taught by one of the Twelve. Many Christians
never even saw an apostle. If their teacher had himself been taught by
an apostle, that was something to be proud of. A new generation of
Christian preachers and teachers began to grow up who had never met
an apostle. They needed to be provided with good reliable information
about Jesus's life, death and teaching.
2. THE SECOND COMING DID NOT HAPPEN
As we saw in Volume 1, the parousia did not happen as soon as Jesus's
followers had expected (Vol. 1, pp. 123, 125). When Christians realized
that Jesus's teaching about His return could be interpreted in other
ways, they began to make longer-term plans for life on this earth.
3. THE DEATH OF THE APOSTLES
Some of the Apostles had died fairly soon after the death of Jesus
Himself. James the son of Zebedee had been put to death by Herod
Agrippa (Acts 12.2; see also Vol. ?, ch. 2), and only a miracle had
prevented Peter from being executed at the same time (Acts 12.3-l l).
We have very little information about the death of the apostles.
According to the tradition of the Church Peter and Paul both died as
martyrs in Rome, probably when Nero was emperor (see Vol. l , ch. 8).
Some probably died natural deaths, from illness or old age, others died
2
THE NEED FOR THE WRITTEN GOSPEL
as martyrs. Certainly the apostles were not going to be with the Church
for ever to keep a check on the stories that were told about Jesus.
This changing situation meant that as time went by Christians began to
have more need of information that was written down.
THE NEEDS OF PREACHERS AND TEACHERS
When the apostles themselves proclaimed the good news about Jesus
they had all the information they needed, since they had been eye-
witnesses of the events which they proclaimed. However, even among
the first converts there were people who had never seen Jesus. They
could only tell the stories which they had heard. Possibly Christians
collected and wrote down information about Jesus at a very early date.
No one knows exactly what they wrote, or how early they wrote it.
However some of the following may have been written down within
twenty years of Jesus's crucifixion.
1. Collections of Old Testament quotations which the Christians
thought pointed to Jesus. Some biblical scholars call such texts 'proof
texts', because they vvere beMeved to 'prove' who Jesus was, e.g. 'Thou
wilt not abandon my soul to Hades, Nor let thy Holy One see
corruption' (Ps. 16.10 as quoted in Acts 2.27). Peter quoted this verse
from the Psalms to 'prove' the resurrection of Jesus. The first two
chapters of Matthew's Gospel contain a great many proof texts.
2. An account of Jesus's suffering and death. The proclamation of
Jesus's death and resurrection was the central feature of the kerygma
(see Vol. 1, pp. 60, 61). Preachers were telling what God had done, and
they needed to know about the main events.
3. Stories about the miracles of Jesus. The miracles fulfilled the
promises of the Old Testament, and pointed to Jesus as the Messiah.
4. Collections of the sayings of Jesus, to be used in teaching new
Christians.
account'. We might deduce from this that he did not consider those
early compilations to be 'orderly'. Luke himself was not an eyewitness,
so he had to depend on other people for his information. He probably
used some of the accounts which other people had compiled.
We have no way of knowing how many accounts Luke knew. One of
them may have been made by Mark. Luke and Mark were both with
Paul when he was in prison (Philemon 23). Nor have we any way of
knowing how many drafts of his Gospel Luke may have made before
the final one that we have in the New Testament. Luke and the other
Church leaders who collected and wrote down stories about Jesus did
not think they were writing 'Scripture'. They were simply providing
tools for the men and women who would preach and teach in the
future. If Luke obtained some new information, or thought of a
different way of presenting his material, he could revise what he had
written. In some of the Gospels there are clues to what an earlier
edition may have been like, but generally speaking we cannot tell how
many stages the Gospels passed through. All we have are the finished
products, and they may have reached their present shape over many
years. Other people may have edited the Gospels besides the original
authors. As in the case of the New Testament letters, possible editorial
additions to the Gospels are called 'redactions' (see Vol. 1, p. 88).
s
i. r
r
r
a 1
?r
l l
j
J
J
'The Church leaders who rccorded the t
P
Church leader or today expounding a
Bible lesson in a local Church in Britain,
or Mothersa Union members in Southern
l
Sudan, who have travelled many miles
through areas tom by guerilla fighting to
preach and pray with fellow-members in
isolated viliages.
L
)j J y sr
=--i
l Y
<71'
f l
nl
r
ji
L!'. Ww
J
s
WHY THE GOSPELS WERE WRITTEN
clearly: 'that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God,
and that believing you may have life in his name' (John 20.31).
THE GOSPELS AS THEOLOGICAL BOOKS
The Gospels are about God, and what God has done. They are 'orderly
accounts', but they are orderly theological accounts, written for theolo-
gical purposes. We may understand this more clearly if we notice what
the writers did not intend their books to be.
(a) The Gospels are not detailed biographical accounts of JeSuS'S
life. If we go to the biography section of a library, and choose a book
about Mahatma Gandhi, for example, we expect to read about his
home and his childhood, what he looked like, the friends he made as he
was growing up, and the various influences that affected his life and
character. When we read the Gospels we find very little information of
this sort. The Gospel writers were not interested in such information.
Only Matthew and Luke tell about any of the events surrounding
Jesus's birth. Luke alone records a single incident from Jesus's child-
hood. The Gospel writers tell us nothing about the greater part of His
life. 'JVe discover almost by chance that Jesus had 'brothers and sisters',
and that He had worked as a carpenter.
(b) Gospels are not books written by professional historians. The
Gospels are full of historical events, but Luke was the only Gospel
writer who was really interested in the details of history. He gave a
rough date for Jesus's birth, and a more precise date for His baptism
(Luke 2.1-2; 3.1-2). Yet even Luke was more interested in theology
than in history.
When God's Son was born as a human being, He entered human
history, and so the Gospels and the creeds contain many historical
facts. When we say 'crucified under Pontius Pilate', it is a way of saying
that the crucifixion was a real event in history. Since Jesus lived in
Palestine in the first century AD, we can find the names of people like
Herod and Tiberius Caesar in the Gospels (see Vol. 1, ch. 2). As the
Gospel writers worked to carry out their main purpose, they were
bound to include historical facts. But their main purpose was always to
show that God was in Jesus Christ, so that people would believe in Him
and become His followers. It was not the Gospel writers' main concern
to tell historical details, or to tell the events of Jesus's life in the order in
which they happened.
THE EVANGELISTS
modern evangelists are different from each other, all having their own
individual approach, so the writers of the four Gospels were all
different. They told the same good news, and wrote about the same
Jesus, but each one of them wrote from his own point of view, and had
in his mind the particular needs of the people for whom he was writing.
STUDY SUGGESTIONS