Geographical Information System (Gis) For Water Resources Management
Geographical Information System (Gis) For Water Resources Management
Geographical Information System (Gis) For Water Resources Management
Abstract
Water resources projects are inherited with overlapping and at times conflicting objectives. These projects are often of varied sizes
ranging from major projects with command areas of millions of hectares to very small projects implemented at the local level. Thus,
in all these projects there is seldom proper coordination which is essential for ensuring collective sustainability.
Integrated watershed development and management is the accepted answer but in turn requires a comprehensive framework that can
enable planning process involving all the stakeholders at different levels and scales is compulsory. Such a unified hydrological
framework is essential to evaluate the cause and effect of all the proposed actions within the drainage basins.
The present paper describes a hydrological framework developed in the form of a Hydrologic Information System (HIS) which is
intended to meet the specific information needs of the various line departments of a typical State connected with water related aspects.
The HIS consist of a hydrologic information database coupled with tools for collating primary and secondary data and tools for
analyzing and visualizing the data and information. The HIS also incorporates hydrological model base for indirect assessment of
various entities of water balance in space and time. The framework would be maintained and updated to reflect fully the most
accurate ground truth data and the infrastructure requirements for planning and management.
Keywords: Hydrological Information System (HIS); WebGIS; Data Model; Web Mapping Services
-----------------------------------------------------------------------***-------------------------------------------------------------------
__________________________________________________________________________________________
IC-RICE Conference Issue | Nov-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 417
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
2. MAJOR ELEMENTS OF THE FRAMEWORK Drainage Line and Area Dataset consist of Basin,Catchment,
Sub-Catchment, Watershed and drainage line. Administrative
The steps taken in the development of framework for water Dataset consist of feature class like State, District, Tehsil, and
resource information system include: 1.Geodatabase Design Village. Landuse and Soil dataset contains Landuse and Soil
and Implementation 2. Generationof indirect information feature class.
through simulation3. Dissemination of information through
GIS server Other non-spatial data like Demography, Livestock data are
collected from village and aggregated up to district level.
The common framework for water resources planning and Irrigated Area, Agriculture Area, Crop, Fertilizer, and
management requires creation of base layers at different scales Pesticide data are collected at the district level.
so as to cater to the relevant problems at the respective scales.
However, it is imperative that all these scales should merge
3. GIS SERVER
through the GIS environment for aggregation and integration
to be possible. It is intended to provide this framework at the In different line departments it is a real challenge to minimize
State level and with implementation at various departments redundancy while ensuring that the right data is accessible in a
connected with water resources. The major elements of the timely and efficient manner. With hundreds of remote offices
framework include as show in the figure 1 and thousands of internal and external GIS users at different
levels of expertise and needs, it is important to overcome
multiple barriers while designing enterprise GIS [9].
__________________________________________________________________________________________
IC-RICE Conference Issue | Nov-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 418
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
feature class are overlaid over village boundary. By using on which watershed the scheme is operating and the
identify button on the Irrigation scheme location, along with beneficiary village with population. Similarly many such
the attribute data of this feature class, it possible to obtain the applications can be demonstrated using this frame work
attribute data of all the feature class below it. This helps the .
user to get the detail information about the irrigation scheme,
hydrologic response units(HRUs). SWAT simulates surface datasets. A good comparison was found between the baseline
and subsurface processes, accounting for snow fall and snow scenario (BL) results and observed dataset (IMD) results. This
melt, vadose zone processes (i.e., infiltration, evaporation, investigation would provide a good basis for selecting
plant uptake, lateral flows and percolation into aquifer). appropriate adaptation strategies to cater to the climate change
Runoff volume is calculated using the Curve Number method. impacts.
Sediment yield from each sub-basin is generated using the
Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) [13]. The SWAT model version 2.1.3 is run on the desktop system,
model updates the C factor of the MUSLE on a daily basis using the ArcGIS interface and the model results of Subbasin;
using information from the crop growth module. The routing Reach for monthly and daily time step was imported to
phase controls the movement of water using the variable Hydrological Information System (HIS) Geodatabase.
storage method or the Muskingum method[3],[4].
7. WEB BASE GIS INTERFACE FOR ANALYSIS
6. CASE STUDY
OF MODEL RESULTS
Indus River in north India is selected for the present study.
The model set-up and runs were performed using SWAT The web based Interface starts by the request of the URL
hydrological model. The GIS interface of this model http://gisserver.civil.iitd.ac.in/natcom. This interface was
ArcSWAT provides an excellent platform for data developed for viewing the model results of the respective Sub-
management and result analysis. In the present study, two Catchment. Figure 4 shows the user view of Indus basin. The
futuristic climate scenarios A2 and B2, and one baseline user can zoom in further to view the catchment, sub-catchment
scenario BL has been used to address the uncertainty issues. and to the watershed level. The standardization of this
Regional scale datasets used for model set-up were: land-use drainage area was done by giving the unique identification
from global land cover fraction, soil from FAO and terrain number at different levels. These unique identification number
model from SRTM.Primarily the water yield and along with sub-catchment name where used as reference for
evapotranspiration component of water balance were modeled further analysis. Figure 5 shows the Web Mapping services of
for each of the sub-catchment. The modeled flow at the sub- sub-catchment with unique identification number as their
catchment outlets were also evaluated for the various labels.
scenarios. To induce a level of confidence in the generated
results, the basin was modeled using Indian Meteorological
Department (IMD) gridded precipitation and temperature
__________________________________________________________________________________________
IC-RICE Conference Issue | Nov-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 420
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
Fig.5 User view of Sub-Catchment with unique identification number as their labels
Figure 6 shows the web based interface to analysis the model based interface is also designed with this concern. SWAT
results. With this web based interface the user is given the model gives many outputs parameters but only few parameters
option of analysis the Catchment or Sub-Catchment or like Water Balance components, Flow, Water Quality
Watershed by selecting it respectively, by selecting the radio parameters like Nitrite, Nitrate, Ammonium, Organic
button side to it confirms the respective selection. The user is Nitrogen, Organic Phosphorus, Mineral Phosphorus, CBOD
also given the option to select the analysis of the SWAT and Dissolved Oxygen, are given as option to user for
model results with the different data set like India analysis. The user is also given the option for the selecting the
Meteorological Department (IMD) for the period of 1971 to time during for the analysis. The selected parameters can be
2005. HadRM3 baseline Scenario (BL) for the period 1961 to viewed through graphs or tables. This web based interface
1990, HadRM3 GHG Scenario A2 & B2 for the period 2071 provides a robust frame platform for the assessing the status of
to 2100. It is important to assess the behaviour of the drainage water resources.
area with and without man made intervention, so the web
__________________________________________________________________________________________
IC-RICE Conference Issue | Nov-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 421
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
CONCLUSIONS
The development of a Geospatial Web Portal is proposed as
the best solution to Hydrological Information and Data
Management. The Web Portal built around a hydrological data
model synthesizes data from diverse sources describing the
water resource, provides visualization tools and link to
externally modeled results. This Geospatial Web Portal would
provide a robust platform for the planning, execution and
monitoring of status of water resources.
REFERENCES
[1]. M.B. Abbott andA.W.Minns (1998), “Computational
hydraulics” (2nd Ed.), AshgatePress,Aldershot, 557p.
[2]. J.G.Arnold R.Srinivasan, R.S.Muttiah, J.R.Williams 1998.
Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment- Part 1:
Model development. Journal of the American Water
Resources Association 34(1),73-89.
[3]. V.T. Chow,D.R. Maidment,L.W.Mays (1988). Applied
Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New Delhi4. J.A.York
Cunge(1969). On the subject of a flood propagation method
(Muskingum Method). Journal of Hydraulics Research 7(2),
205-230.
[4]. J.A.Cunge(1969). On the subject of a flood propagation
method (Muskingum Method).Journal of Hydraulics Research
7(2), 205-230.
[5]. W.G.Gray, ,A.Leijnse, R.L.Kollar. C.A. Blain (1993),
“Mathematical tools for changing spatial scales in the analysis
of physical system.” CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL,232p.
[6]. D.R. Maidment(2002) Arc Hydro: GIS for Water
Resources, ESRI Press, Redlands, Calif 203 pp.[7]. Mehdi
Mashud Khan, Angela Kneece, IshwariSivagnanam, Jared
John Shoultz(2009).
http://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/0507/dhec.html (accessed
January 17, 2013)
[8]. R.J. Naiman and R.E. Bilby (1998), (ed.) “River Ecology
and Ma nagement”, Springer, New York, 705p.
[9]. G.F.Pinder(2002), “Groundwater Modeling using
geographical information systems”, Wiley, New York, 231pp.
[10[. Spotsylvania County Government (2008). “Spotsylvania
County Enterprise-Wide Applications”
https://www.spotsylvania.va.us/emplibrary/Enterprise-
ide_Solutions.pdf (accessed May 22,2013)
[11]. D.A.Quattrochi and M.F. Goodchild (1997), “Scale and
remote sensing in GIS”, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FI.
[12]. J.P.WilsonandJ.C.Gallant (2000), “Terrain analysis,
principles and applications” Wiley, New York, 479p.
[13]. J.R.Williams(1995). The EPIC model. In: Singh,
V.P.(Ed.), Computer Models of watershed Hydrology. Water
Resources Publication, Colorado, USA, pp.909-1000
__________________________________________________________________________________________
IC-RICE Conference Issue | Nov-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 422