Unit 2 Philosophy of Hinduism: 2.0 Objectives
Unit 2 Philosophy of Hinduism: 2.0 Objectives
Unit 2 Philosophy of Hinduism: 2.0 Objectives
2.0 OBJECTIVES
An ancient saying depicts a person, unaware of the golden treasure lying
underground, walking up and down the floor several times, and brooding over
his wretched state of living. Being Indians, much more as students of philosophy,
we are to be aware of this treasure of our land. The present unit on the
philosophy of Hinduism initiates the students to the precious nature of this
treasure, and motivates them to unearth the hidden riches of the religious, spiritual,
and philosophical heritage of Hinduism.
2.1 INTRODUCTION
India is the birth place of many religions and religious sects. The word ‘Hindu’
is not of Hindu origin. It is not found in any standard Sanskrit dictionary. The
Persians used to refer to the people who lived on the other side of the Indus
(Sindu) river, as Hindu. Hinduism is more of an umbrella, sheltering many different
religious traditions which originated in very ancient times and in various parts
of the subcontinent. Some Hindu thinkers suggest that the Vedas provide the
bond that holds the Hindus together.
The seers of the Vedic period possessed a peculiar awareness of sin and guilt.
There are three basic insights, like three seeds, which later may be developed
into complete theories. Firstly, there is a series of words indicating an external
cause for all sorts of violence, harming, hurting, and afflicting. Here the cause
of evil comes from the outside; it encroaches upon us and hinders the happy
and smooth development of our being. The evil is transcendent. Secondly, another
set of words seem to denote an internal source; these words speak of anxiety,
narrowness, lack of expansion, and a feeling of imprisonment within oneself.
Here the cause is within and seems to be inherent in our own nature. We cannot
blame others but only ourselves. We would like to be different and yet we
are not. Evil here is immanent. Thirdly, a set of words, most of them compounds,
seems to suggest that evil springs from maladjustment and malfunctioning of a
system that otherwise is far from being bad. These words postulate a kind of
factual ambivalence in almost any human value, which can turn out to be either
negative and mischievous, or positive and beneficial. Evil here depends on the
direction that events and values take, and on the use we or others make of
the data. The Vedas employ a term for grace, which implies pure and simple
forgiveness. The gods are requested to forgive man’s real sins and also his
constitutional shortcomings. Man is never worthy of grace from the divine.
Mrdika, though occurring only nine times in the Rg veda, denotes the grace
that elevates man and wipes away all his stains. We have here a forgiveness
that comes, unpredictably and undeservedly, from the divine.
26
Savarkar, V. D. Hindutva: Who is a Hindu? Bombay: Veer Savarkar Philosophy of Hinduism
Prakashan, 1989.
Swami Tattvavidananda Saraswati, Essentials of Hinduism. Secunderabad:
Brahma vidya Kuteer, 2003.
Swami Tejomayananda, Hindu Culture: An Introduction. Mumbai: Central
Chinmaya Mission Trust, 2004.
Swamini Pramananda Saraswati, Vedic Dharma and Culture. Coimbatore:
Surti Seva Trust, 2004.
27