Chris Mattei Threat
Chris Mattei Threat
Chris Mattei Threat
V. : AT WATERBURY
____________________________________________________________________________
V. : AT WATERBURY
_____________________________________________________________________________
V. : AT WATERBURY
On June 14, 2019 (this past Friday), defendant Alex Jones broadcast two segments of The
Alex Jones Show identifying Attorney Chris Mattei by name and showing a picture of him,
falsely claiming that Attorney Mattei tried to frame Jones by planting child pornography in
discovery materials produced by Jones, distorting what actually occurred in the discovery
process in this case, and threatening Attorney Mattei and the Koskoff firm. This Court has an
obligation to protect the attorneys, parties, and the judicial process. Sacher v. United States, 343
U.S. 1, 14 (1952) (reaffirming the Court’s obligation to “protect the processes of orderly trial,
1
which is the supreme object of the lawyer’s calling”); Potts v. Postal Trucking Co., 2018 WL
794550, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 2018) (collecting cases where courts exercised inherent powers
to sanction lawyers or parties for threats). Here, threats against counsel have been made on air to
a very large audience. The plaintiffs therefore request that the Court review the video in advance
of tomorrow’s hearing. Plaintiffs intend to move to seek specific relief on an expedited basis, but
this is an issue that the Court should be fully aware of at the earliest possible moment.
We estimate review of these segments of the show will take approximately thirty
the case begins at 2:12. At approximately 2:19 is the first mention of the child pornography
issue. At 2:30, the discussion intensifies and shortly afterward Jones names Attorney Mattei.
These segments concern the fact that the Jones Defendants produced numerous images of
As the Court will recall, the Jones Defendants failed to produce email metadata, a
necessary part of these documents, in their original production. The plaintiffs requested that the
Jones Defendants be ordered to do so. In the April 30 hearing, counsel for the Jones Defendants
agreed to make that production. The Jones Defendants produced metadata on May 21. They
1
In these segments, Jones also says that he is manipulating the Jones Defendants’ Google
Analytics data to generate reports to defend this case – even though he has withheld that same
data for months (and is continuing to do so) and his proxies have claimed to have only the most
rudimentary understanding of how to use the data.
2
produced a massive volume of documents, indicating that many were non-responsive, but they
said that they did not have time to cull the non-responsive documents.
The plaintiffs’ Electronically Stored Information (ESI) consultants began loading files
into a document review database in an effort to make them reviewable by counsel as quickly as
possible. During that process, the consultants identified an image that appeared to be child
pornography. They immediately contacted counsel, who immediately contacted the FBI. The FBI
directed counsel to give control of the entire document production to the FBI, which was done.
The FBI advised counsel that its review located numerous additional illegal images, which had
apparently been sent to Infowars email addresses. When the FBI indicated it had completed its
review, plaintiffs’ counsel advised Attorney Pattis of the matter and arranged a joint telephone
It is worth noting that if the Jones Defendants had engaged in even minimal due
diligence and actually reviewed the materials before production, they would have found the
images themselves. Because the Jones Defendants did not do that, they transmitted images to the
plaintiffs that if they were knowingly possessed is a serious federal crime. The Jones Defendants
put plaintiffs’ counsel and ESI consultants in the appalling position of discovering the first
image. Plaintiffs’ ESI consultants then acted exactly as they were compelled to under federal law
once they discovered the contraband images; so did plaintiffs’ counsel. But this appears not to
Rather than summarize the content of the video, we simply ask the Court to watch it.
3
You think when you call up, “Oh we’ll protect you. We found the child porn.” 2 I
like women with big giant tits and big asses. I don’t like kids like you goddamn
rapists. Eff-heads. In fact, delete this: You fucks are going to get it. You fucking
child molesters. I’ll fucking get you in the end. You fucks. No, we’re done right
there. You know what, I should have deleted it on radio. Probably still went out. I
don’t care. You’re trying to set me up with child porn, I’ll get your ass. One million
dollars, you little gang members. One million dollars to put your head on a pike.
One million dollars, bitch. 3 I’m going to get your ass, you understand me now?
You’re not going to ever defeat Texas, you sacks of shit, so you get ready for that.
At 2:37:20, Jones names Attorney Mattei, pounds on a picture of his face, and threatens him:
And then now magically they want metadata out of hundreds of thousands of emails they
got, and they know just where to go. What a nice group of Democrats. How surprising.
What nice people. Chris Mattei. Chris Mattei. Let’s zoom in on Chris Mattei. Oh, nice
little—[pounds picture of Attorney Mattei’s face with fist]—Chris Mattei. What a good
American. What a good boy. You think you’ll put on me, what—[under his breath] I’m
gonna kill . . . [growls]. Anyway, I’m done! Total war! You want it, you got it! I’m not
into kids like your Democratic party, you cocksuckers! So get ready!
At the Tuesday hearing, the plaintiffs will request an expedited briefing schedule
concerning what orders must issue in connection with Mr. Jones’ on-air statements and Attorney
Pattis’ participation in this broadcast. In addition, the plaintiffs may seek interim relief, to span
2
This statement apparently refers to (and distorts) the call that Attorney Mattei made to Attorney
Pattis to inform Attorney Pattis that child pornography had been discovered in the Jones
Defendants’ production.
3
At various points throughout the segment, Jones refers to Attorney Mattei as “bitch.” He also
refers to Attorney Mattei as “pimp,” “white-shoe boy,” and “white-shoe boy jerkoff.”
4
THE PLAINTIFFS
By /s/302902
WILLIAM M. BLOSS
ALINOR C. STERLING
MATTHEW S. BLUMENTHAL
KOSKOFF KOSKOFF & BIEDER
350 FAIRFIELD AVENUE
BRIDGEPORT, CT 06604
asterling@koskoff.com
mblumenthal@koskoff.com
Telephone: (203) 336-4421
Fax: (203) 368-3244
JURIS #32250
5
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been emailed and/or mailed, this day,
postage prepaid, to all counsel and pro se appearances as follows:
For Alex Emric Jones, Infowars, LLC, Free Speech Systems, LLC, Infowars Health, LLC and
Prison Planet TV, LLC:
Norman Pattis, Esq.
Pattis & Smith LLC
383 Orange Street, 1st Floor
New Haven, CT 06511
dpeat@pattisandsmith.com
P: 203-393-3017
F: 203-393-9745
/s/302902
WILLIAM BLOSS
ALINOR C. STERLING
MATTHEW S. BLUMENTHAL