Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = LEA_1 domain-containing protein

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 5830 KiB  
Article
Insights into Genes Encoding LEA_1 Domain-Containing Proteins in Cyperus esculentus, a Desiccation-Tolerant Tuber Plant
by Yongguo Zhao, Xiaowen Fu and Zhi Zou
Plants 2024, 13(20), 2933; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202933 - 19 Oct 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1033
Abstract
LEA_1 domain-containing proteins constitute a class of late-embryogenesis-abundant proteins that are highly hydrophilic and predominantly accumulate in mature seeds. Though LEA_1 proteins have been proven to be essential for seed desiccation tolerance and longevity, little information is available on their roles in non-seed [...] Read more.
LEA_1 domain-containing proteins constitute a class of late-embryogenesis-abundant proteins that are highly hydrophilic and predominantly accumulate in mature seeds. Though LEA_1 proteins have been proven to be essential for seed desiccation tolerance and longevity, little information is available on their roles in non-seed storage organs. In this study, a first genome-wide characterization of the LEA_1 gene family was conducted in tigernut (Cyperus esculentus L., Cyperaceae), whose underground tubers are desiccation tolerant with a moisture content of less than 6%. Five family members identified in tigernut are comparative to four to six found in seven other Cyperaceae plants, but relatively more than three reported in Arabidopsis. Further comparison of 125 members from 29 plant species supports early divergence of the LEA_1 family into two phylogenetic groups before angiosperm radiation, and gene expansion in tigernut was contributed by whole-genome duplications occurring after the split with the eudicot clade. These two phylogenetic groups could be further divided into six orthogroups in the momocot clade, five of which are present in tigernut and the remaining one is Poaceae specific. Frequent structural variation and expression divergence of paralogs were also observed. Significantly, in contrast to seed-preferential expression of LEA_1 genes in Arabidopsis, rice, and maize, transcriptional profiling and qRT-PCR analysis revealed that CeLEA1 genes have evolved to predominantly express in tubers, exhibiting a seed desiccation-like accumulation during tuber development. Moreover, CeLEA1 transcripts in tubers were shown to be considerably more than that of their orthologs in purple nutsedge, another Cyperaceae plant producing desiccation-sensitive tubers. These results imply species-specific activation and key roles of CeLEA1 genes in the acquisition of desiccation tolerance of tigernut tubers as observed in orthodox seeds. Our findings not only improve the understanding of lineage-specific evolution of the LEA_1 family, but also provide valuable information for further functional analysis and genetic improvement in tigernut. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Molecular Biology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Structural and phylogenetic analyses of <span class="html-italic">LEA_1</span> family genes in <span class="html-italic">C. esculentus</span>. (<b>A</b>) Amino acid composition of CeLEA1 proteins. (<b>B</b>) The unrooted phylogenetic tree resulting from full-length Ce/AtLEA1 proteins with MEGA6 (maximum likelihood method and bootstrap of 1000 replicates), where the distance scale denotes the number of amino acid substitutions per site. The name of each clade is indicated next to the corresponding group. (<b>C</b>) Exon–intron structures, where 0 and 1 indicate intron phases. (<b>D</b>) The distribution of conserved motifs among Ce/AtLEA1 proteins, where different motifs are represented by different color blocks as indicated and the same color block in different proteins indicates a certain motif. (At: <span class="html-italic">A. thaliana</span>; CDS: coding sequence; Ce: <span class="html-italic">C. esculentus</span>; LEA: late embryogenesis abundant).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Species-specific distribution of six orthogroups in 29 representative plant species. The species tree is referred to NCBI Taxonomy (<a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy" target="_blank">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy</a> (accessed on 20 August 2023)) and recent whole-genome duplications or triplications resulting in polyploidy (CoGepedia; <a href="https://genomevolution.org/wiki/index.php/Plant_paleopolyploidy" target="_blank">https://genomevolution.org/wiki/index.php/Plant_paleopolyploidy</a> (accessed on 20 August 2023)) are marked. “?” indicates unknown. (LEA: late embryogenesis abundant.)</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Synteny analysis within and between <span class="html-italic">C. esculentus</span> and representative plant species. (<b>A</b>) Synteny analysis within and between <span class="html-italic">C. esculentus</span>, <span class="html-italic">A. gramineus</span>, <span class="html-italic">A. thaliana</span>, and <span class="html-italic">A. trichopoda</span>. (<b>B</b>) Synteny analysis within and between <span class="html-italic">C. esculentus</span>, <span class="html-italic">C. littledalei</span>, <span class="html-italic">C. scoparia</span>, and <span class="html-italic">R. breviuscula</span>. (<b>C</b>) Synteny analysis within and between <span class="html-italic">C. esculentus</span>, <span class="html-italic">J. effusus</span>, <span class="html-italic">J. ascendens</span>, <span class="html-italic">S. stoloniferum</span>, and <span class="html-italic">A. comosus</span>. (<b>D</b>) Synteny analysis within and between <span class="html-italic">C. esculentus</span>, <span class="html-italic">B. distachyon</span>, <span class="html-italic">O. sativa</span>, and <span class="html-italic">S. italica</span>. <span class="html-italic">LEA_1</span> gene-encoding chromosomes/scaffolds and only syntenic blocks containing <span class="html-italic">LEA_1</span> genes are marked, where red and purple lines for intra- and inter-species, respectively. The scale is in Mb. (Ac: <span class="html-italic">A. comosus</span>; Ag: <span class="html-italic">A. gramineus</span>; At: <span class="html-italic">A. thaliana</span>; Atr: <span class="html-italic">A. trichopoda</span>; Bd: <span class="html-italic">B. distachyon</span>; Ce: <span class="html-italic">C. esculentus</span>; Cl: <span class="html-italic">C. littledalei</span>; Cs: <span class="html-italic">C. scoparia</span>; Ja: <span class="html-italic">J. ascendens</span>; Je: <span class="html-italic">J. effuses</span>; Mb: megabase; Os: <span class="html-italic">O. sativa</span>; Rb: <span class="html-italic">R. breviuscula</span>; Si: <span class="html-italic">S. italic</span>; Ss: <span class="html-italic">S. stoloniferum</span>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Expression profiles of <span class="html-italic">CeLEA1 and CrLEA1</span> genes. (<b>A</b>) Tissue-specific expression profiles of five <span class="html-italic">CeLEA1</span> genes. (<b>B</b>) Expression profiles of <span class="html-italic">CeLEA1-2</span>, <span class="html-italic">-3</span>, and <span class="html-italic">-4</span> at different stages of tuber development. (<b>C</b>) Expression profiles of <span class="html-italic">CeLEA1 and CrLEA1</span> genes at three representative stages of tuber development. The heatmap was generated using the R package implemented with a row-based standardization. Color scale represents FPKM normalized log<sub>2</sub> transformed counts, where blue indicates low expression and red indicates high expression. Bars indicate SD (N = 3) and uppercase letters indicate a difference significance following Duncan’s one-way multiple-range post hoc ANOVA (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01). (Ce: <span class="html-italic">C. esculentus</span>; Cr: <span class="html-italic">C. rotundus</span>; DAI: days after tuber initiation; DAS: days after sowing; FPKM: Fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped.)</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 10953 KiB  
Article
Transcription Factor GmERF105 Negatively Regulates Salt Stress Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana
by Lu Li, Zhen Zhu, Juan Liu, Yu Zhang, Yang Lu, Jinming Zhao, Han Xing and Na Guo
Plants 2023, 12(16), 3007; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12163007 - 21 Aug 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2317
Abstract
The Ethylene Response Factor (ERF) transcription factors form a subfamily of the AP2/ERF family that is instrumental in mediating plant responses to diverse abiotic stressors. Herein, we present the isolation and characterization of the GmERF105 gene from Williams 82 (W82), which is rapidly [...] Read more.
The Ethylene Response Factor (ERF) transcription factors form a subfamily of the AP2/ERF family that is instrumental in mediating plant responses to diverse abiotic stressors. Herein, we present the isolation and characterization of the GmERF105 gene from Williams 82 (W82), which is rapidly induced by salt, drought, and abscisic acid (ABA) treatments in soybean. The GmERF105 protein contains an AP2 domain and localizes to the nucleus. GmERF105 was selectively bound to GCC-box by gel migration experiments. Under salt stress, overexpression of GmERF105 in Arabidopsis significantly reduced seed germination rate, fresh weight, and antioxidant enzyme activity; meanwhile, sodium ion content, malonic dialdehyde (MDA) content, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels were markedly elevated compared to the wild type. It was further found that the transcription levels of CSD1 and CDS2 of two SOD genes were reduced in OE lines. Furthermore, the GmERF105 transgenic plants displayed suppressed expression of stress response marker genes, including KIN1, LEA14, NCED3, RD29A, and COR15A/B, under salt treatment. Our findings suggest that GmERF105 can act as a negative regulator in plant salt tolerance pathways by affecting ROS scavenging systems and the transcription of stress response marker genes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Adaptive Mechanisms of Plants to Biotic or Abiotic Stresses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>GmERF105 protein sequence and phylogenetic tree analysis. (<b>a</b>) Protein structure of the GmERF105; (<b>b</b>) The sequence alignments generated by DNAMAN software. The red box indicates the AP2 DNA-binding domain. The amphipathic α-helix and three β-sheets are labeled above the corresponding sequence. The YRG and RAYD elements are represented by the blue bar below the alignment; (<b>c</b>) Phylogenetic relationships between GmERF105 and other ERFs from various species. The phylogenetic tree was generated by the neighbor-joining method using MEGA 6.0. GmERF105 is indicated by the red triangles. The protein sequences of the selected ERF genes were obtained from Phytozome or Genebank; the Accession Numbers are as follows: GsERF7 (GLYMA_07G044300), JERF3 (AAQ91334.1), GmERF75 (GLYMA_10G016500), OsERF106MZ (OSNPB_080537900), StERF3 (XP_006365342.1), AtERF105 (AT5G51190), GmERF105 (GLYMA_20G070000), AtERF4 (AT3G15210), OsERF922 (Os01g0752500), AtERF98 (AT3G23230), TaERF87 (XP_044360011.1), AtERF1 (AT3G23240), and MdERF4 (XP_008364034.2), IDS1 (OSNPB_030818800).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Expression of <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> in soybean tissues under different abiotic stress treatments. (<b>a</b>) the expression levels of <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> in different soybean tissues were detected. When the first trifoliate leaves are fully unfolded, the roots, stems, and leaves are selected as samples. (<b>b</b>–<b>f</b>) patterns of <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> expression under the different treatments of abiotic stresses; (<b>b</b>) 150 mM NaCl; (<b>c</b>) dehydration; (<b>d</b>) 50 mM NaHCO<sub>3</sub>; (<b>e</b>) 100 µm ABA; (<b>f</b>) 50 µm ACC. Roots were collected at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after different treatments, respectively. The values are the means ± SDs (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). The asterisks show significant differences between the control and salt treatments according to Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test: * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>GmERF105 is a nuclear protein. Nuclear localization of the GmERF105 protein in leaf epidermal cells of <span class="html-italic">Nicotiana benthamiana</span>. Nicotiana leaves transiently expressing GFP alone (<b>upper</b>) and GmERF105-GFP (<b>bottom</b>) proteins were observed with a confocal microscope (Olympus FluoView FV1000, Tokyo, Japan).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Characterization of the DNA binding affinity of the recombinant GmERF105 protein. (<b>a</b>) western about the recombinant GmERF105 protein. (<b>b</b>) sequence of the oligonucleotides used in the DNA binding studies. (<b>c</b>) gel retardation assay showing sequence-specific binding of the recombinant GmERF105 protein. The black band indicates the position of a protein–DNA complex after the incubation of 6 ‘FAM-labeled DNA probes and the GmERF105 protein. The bottom part is the free probe. Hot probe, a probe labeled with 6 ‘FAM. Cold probe, is the same as the labeled probe, but it is not labeled, as a competitor. Mutant Probe: unlabeled DNA probe containing the mutated motif.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Overexpression of <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> repressed the germination rates of Arabidopsis under salt stress. Seed germination under the treatment of salt. The photo was taken on the fourth day. Error bars represent ± SD. The observation values were the averages of three repetitions (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). Three independent biological experiments were carried out to investigate the seed germination of WT and <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> transgenic lines under salt stress. WT, wild type; OX4, 7, 10: <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> Arabidopsis transgenic lines of T3 generations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p><span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> decreased the resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana to salt stress. (<b>a</b>) the phenotypes of WT and <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> transgenic lines under normal and salt stress. (<b>b</b>) the determination of fresh weight (aboveground). (<b>c</b>) the determination of Na<sup>+</sup> contents. The wild-type controls and <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> transgenic line plants were grown in pots for two weeks and then irrigated with a solution of 150 mM NaCl for 16 days. WT, wild type; OX4, 7, 10: <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> Arabidopsis transgenic lines of T3 generations. The data are mean values ± SDs (** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test). All the experiments included three biological replications.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Analysis of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, MDA, and antioxidant enzyme activity of WT and <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span>-overexpressing plants. (<b>a</b>) H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> contents of WT and <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> OE lines after 150 mM NaCl treatment. (<b>b</b>) MDA contents of WT and <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> OE lines after 150 mM NaCl treatment. (<b>c</b>) SOD activity of WT and <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> OE lines after 150 mM NaCl treatment. (<b>d</b>) CAT activity of WT and <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> OE lines after 150 mM NaCl treatment. After 16 days of salt treatment, the leaves were selected as samples. The data are mean values ± SDs (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test). All the experiments included three biological replications.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Transcription levels of SOD isoforms and CAT isoforms in WT and <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> overexpressing plants. The wild-type controls and <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> transgenic lines plants were grown in pots for two weeks and then irrigated with a solution of 150 mM NaCl for 16 days. Samples were taken from the aboveground part of the Arabidopsis plant. The transcription levels of each gene were analyzed by qRT-PCR using <span class="html-italic">actin</span>2 as the reference gene. The data are mean values ± SDs (** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test). All the experiments included three biological replications.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Expression levels of stress-related genes in WT and GmERF105 overexpressing plants. The transcription levels of <span class="html-italic">KIN1</span>, <span class="html-italic">LEA14</span>, <span class="html-italic">NCED3</span>, <span class="html-italic">RD29A</span>, <span class="html-italic">COR15A</span>, and <span class="html-italic">COR15B</span> were analyzed by qRT-PCR using <span class="html-italic">actin2</span> as the reference gene. The data are mean values ± SDs (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test). All the experiments included three biological replications.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The molecular mechanism model for the regulation of plant salt stress by <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span>. When plants are under salt stress conditions, the transcription level of <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> increases. <span class="html-italic">GmERF105</span> inhibits ROS scavenging capacity and reduces the transcription of stress-related genes in plants, resulting in an increased sensitivity of plants to salt stress.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2470 KiB  
Article
Drought Stress Priming Improved the Drought Tolerance of Soybean
by Mariz Sintaha, Chun-Kuen Man, Wai-Shing Yung, Shaowei Duan, Man-Wah Li and Hon-Ming Lam
Plants 2022, 11(21), 2954; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212954 - 2 Nov 2022
Cited by 26 | Viewed by 4764
Abstract
The capability of a plant to protect itself from stress-related damages is termed “adaptability” and the phenomenon of showing better performance in subsequent stress is termed “stress memory”. While drought is one of the most serious disasters to result from climate change, the [...] Read more.
The capability of a plant to protect itself from stress-related damages is termed “adaptability” and the phenomenon of showing better performance in subsequent stress is termed “stress memory”. While drought is one of the most serious disasters to result from climate change, the current understanding of drought stress priming in soybean is still inadequate for effective crop improvement. To fill this gap, in this study, the drought memory response was evaluated in cultivated soybean (Glycine max). To determine if a priming stress prior to a drought stress would be beneficial to the survival of soybean, plants were divided into three treatment groups: the unprimed group receiving one cycle of stress (1S), the primed group receiving two cycles of stress (2S), and the unstressed control group not subjected to any stress (US). When compared with the unprimed plants, priming led to a reduction of drought stress index (DSI) by 3, resulting in more than 14% increase in surviving leaves, more than 13% increase in leaf water content, slight increase in shoot water content and a slower rate of loss of water from the detached leaves. Primed plants had less than 60% the transpiration rate and stomatal conductance compared to the unprimed plants, accompanied by a slight drop in photosynthesis rate, and about a 30% increase in water usage efficiency (WUE). Priming also increased the root-to-shoot ratio, potentially improving water uptake. Selected genes encoding late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins and MYB, NAC and PP2C domain-containing transcription factors were shown to be highly induced in primed plants compared to the unprimed group. In conclusion, priming significantly improved the drought stress response in soybean during recurrent drought, partially through the maintenance of water status and stronger expression of stress related genes. In sum, we have identified key physiological parameters for soybean which may be used as indicators for future genetic study to identify the genetic element controlling the drought stress priming. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Phenotypes of the drought-sensitive soybean C08 plants after drought treatment. (<b>a</b>) Left: plants after 2 cycles of drought treatment (2S: 7 days without irrigation until the first sign of wilting, followed by 5 days of recovery and then 10 days without irrigation). Right: plants receiving only 1 cycle of drought treatment (1S: 10 days without irrigation with no priming). (<b>b</b>) Phenotype of unstressed plants (US) well irrigated throughout the experiment. (<b>c</b>) The 2S plants laid out individually on a flat surface. (<b>d</b>) The 1S plants laid out individually on a flat surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Performance of primed (2S) and unprimed (1S) soybean C08 plants under drought treatment compared to the untreated control (US). (<b>a</b>) Drought stress index, n = 28–30 plants. (<b>b</b>) Percentage of surviving leaves, n = 20–30 plants. (<b>c</b>) Relative water content, n = 19–29 plants. (<b>d</b>) Shoot water retention, n = 26–30 plants. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare between the mean values of each treatment following one-way ANOVA. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences between groups at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. Each experiment was performed twice (First and Second Experiment), with similar results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Rates of fresh weight loss over an hour from a detached leaflet of the top trifoliate leaves of primed (2S), unprimed (1S) and unstressed control (US) soybean C08 plants relative to the initial fresh weight immediately after detachment. n = 12 plants. Error bars indicate standard deviation. The experiment was performed twice (Experiments 1 and 2), with similar results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Changes in the photosynthesis-related parameters of primed (2S) and unprimed (1S) soybean C08 plants under drought treatment compared to the unstressed control (US). (<b>a</b>) Rate of transpiration, n = 12 plants. (<b>b</b>) Stomatal conductance, n = 12 plants. (<b>c</b>) Rate of photosynthesis, n = 12 plants. (<b>d</b>) Water usage efficiency, n = 12 plants. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare between the mean values of each treatment following one-way ANOVA. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences between groups at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Box-and-whisker plots of the chlorophyll contents of primed (2S) and unprimed (1S) soybean C08 plants under drought treatment compared to the unstressed control (US). The whiskers represent the maximum and minimum values in the sample. Wilcoxon rank-sum test following one-way ANOVA was used to compare between the mean values of each treatment. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. n = 19–30.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The relative expression levels of selected genes in primed (2S) and unprimed (1S) soybean C08 plants under drought treatment and the unstressed control (US) were analyzed by RT-qPCR. (<b>a</b>) Expression of Glyma.06G248900, (<b>b</b>) Glyma.05G234600, (<b>c</b>) Glyma.14G195200, and (<b>d</b>) Glyma.19G147200 was calculated by 2<sup>−ΔΔCT</sup> method. The data are presented as the mean of three technical replicates ± SD. Tukey’s honest significance test was used to compare between the mean values of each treatment following one-way ANOVA. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences between groups at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. <span class="html-italic">act11</span> and <span class="html-italic">elf1b</span> were used as the reference genes. The scale on the left <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis refers to the data from the first experiments and that on the right <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis refers to those from the second experiment.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 12735 KiB  
Article
Sugarcane ScDREB2B-1 Confers Drought Stress Tolerance in Transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana by Regulating the ABA Signal, ROS Level and Stress-Related Gene Expression
by Yufeng Chen, Zhu Li, Tingting Sun, Dongjiao Wang, Zhoutao Wang, Chang Zhang, Youxiong Que, Jinlong Guo, Liping Xu and Yachun Su
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(17), 9557; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179557 - 23 Aug 2022
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 2653
Abstract
The dehydration-responsive element-binding protein (DREB) is a subgroup member of the AP2/ERF family and actively participates in the response of plants to abiotic stress. Although DREB genes have been studied in a variety of plant species, there are few reports of DREB genes [...] Read more.
The dehydration-responsive element-binding protein (DREB) is a subgroup member of the AP2/ERF family and actively participates in the response of plants to abiotic stress. Although DREB genes have been studied in a variety of plant species, there are few reports of DREB genes in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). In this study, a novel full-length cDNA sequence of the ScDREB2B-1 gene was cloned from the Saccharum hybrid ROC22, whose encoding protein contained only one AP2-conserved domain and was clustered into the DREB (A-2) subgroup. The diverse promoter elements in the ScDREB2B-1 gene and the accumulated transcripts of its homologous gene (SsAP2/ERF-107) in S. spontaneum under drought stress suggest that the ScDREB2B-1 gene may play a role in drought response. In addition, reverse transcription quantitative PCR analysis showed that the expression level of the ScDREB2B-1 gene was upregulated in the root and leaf of ROC22 under polyethylene glycol, sodium chloride and abscisic acid (ABA) treatments. The yeast two-hybrid experiment demonstrated that ScDREB2B-1 had transcriptional self-activation activity. Compared with wild-type plants, the overexpression of the ScDREB2B-1 gene improved the drought tolerance of the transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana by activating the ABA pathway to enhance the expression of the ABA-responsive gene (NbNCED) and ABA content, regulate the intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) level (enhance the transcripts of ROS synthase-related gene NbRbohB and the activities of catalase, peroxidase and superoxide dismutase) and increase the relative water content, proline content and expression level of osmotic stress-related genes (NbERD and NbLEA). Collectively, our data indicate that ScDREB2B-1 is a stress-inducible and ABA-responsive transcription factor gene that responds to drought stress by regulating ABA signaling, ROS levels and stress-related gene expression. This study contributes to a better understanding of the biological function of ScDREB2B-1, which could serve as a foundation for future resistance breeding in sugarcane. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crop Stress Biology and Molecular Breeding)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Amino acid sequence alignment of the ScDREB2B-1 protein and its four homologous proteins. Red box: YRG conserved element; black box: RAYD conserved element; blue box: the 14th valine (V14) and 19th glutamic acid (E19) residues in the AP2 conservative domain. SsAP2/ERF-107: <span class="html-italic">Saccharum spontaneum</span> DREB protein; SoDREB: <span class="html-italic">S. officinarum</span> DREB protein; SbDREB: <span class="html-italic">Sorghum bicolor</span> DREB protein; ZmDREB: <span class="html-italic">Zea mays</span> DREB protein. The yellow background showed identical residues; the green background and the blue background were blocks of similar residues; the red background depicted the weakly similar residues; the white background represented non-similar residues.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Phylogenetic tree analysis of ScDREB2B-1 protein in sugarcane and typical DREB (A-1-A-6) proteins in other plant species. The red font was the ScDREB2B-1 protein. Os, Zm, Sb, Ss, Lc, Vu, At and Hv represented <span class="html-italic">Oryza sativa</span>, <span class="html-italic">Zea mays</span>, <span class="html-italic">Sorghum bicolor</span>, <span class="html-italic">Saccharum spontaneum</span>, <span class="html-italic">Leymus chinensis</span>, <span class="html-italic">Vigna unguiculata</span>, <span class="html-italic">Arabidopsis thaliana</span> and <span class="html-italic">Hordeum vulgare</span>, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Expression of the <span class="html-italic">ScDREB2B-1</span> gene in sugarcane hybrid ROC22 under sodium chloride (NaCl), polyethylene glycol (PEG) 8000 and abscisic acid (ABA) treatments by RT-qPCR analysis. Quantitative data were normalized by the expression level of double references of <span class="html-italic">CAC</span> (clathrin adaptor complex) and <span class="html-italic">CUL</span> (cullin) genes. All expression data points were means ± standard error (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). Significant differences were found between different letter substitutes on the column calculated by Duncan’s new multiple range test (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Promoter elements analysis of the <span class="html-italic">ScDREB2B-1</span> gene and expression profiles of the <span class="html-italic">Saccharum spontaneum</span> SsAP2/ERF gene family under drought stress. (<b>A</b>) Promoter elements analysis between <span class="html-italic">ScDREB2B-1</span> and its homologous gene <span class="html-italic">SsAP2/ERF-107</span> in <span class="html-italic">S. spontaneum</span>. Green and blue fonts represented hormone responsive elements and environmental stress-related elements, respectively. (<b>B</b>) Expression profiles of <span class="html-italic">S. spontaneum</span> SsAP2/ERF gene family under drought stress. The red font was <span class="html-italic">SsAP2/ERF-107</span>, which was a member of the ERF subfamily and a homologous gene of <span class="html-italic">ScDREB2B-1</span>. The expression heat map of <span class="html-italic">SsAP2/ERF</span> was constructed by TBtools with the transcript level transformed by log<sub>2</sub> (FPKM + 1). FPKM mean fragments per kb per million.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The transcriptional self-activation activity of ScDREB2B-1 protein in yeast. SDO: media without tryptophan; SDO/X: media without tryptophan but containing Trp/X-α-Gal dye; SDO/X/A: media without tryptophan but with Trp/X-α-Gal dye and aureobasidin A. pGBKT7-53+pGADT7-T: positive control; pGBKT7: negative control; pGBKT7-<span class="html-italic">ScDREB2B-1</span>: yeast transformant with pGBKT7-<span class="html-italic">ScDREB2B-1</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Phenotypes of transgenic <span class="html-italic">Nicotiana benthamiana</span> plants overexpressed sugarcane <span class="html-italic">ScDREB2B-1</span> under drought stress for 2 d. WT: wild-type <span class="html-italic">N. benthamiana</span>. OE1 and OE2: different transgenic <span class="html-italic">N. benthamiana</span> lines overexpressed <span class="html-italic">ScDREB2B-1</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Contents of chlorophyll, relative water and proline in transgenic <span class="html-italic">Nicotiana benthamiana</span> plants overexpressed the <span class="html-italic">ScDREB2B-1</span> gene under drought stress for 2 d. (<b>A</b>) Chlorophyll content. (<b>B</b>) Relative water content. (<b>C</b>) Proline content. WT: wild-type <span class="html-italic">N. benthamiana</span>. OE1 and OE2: different transgenic <span class="html-italic">N. benthamiana</span> lines overexpressed <span class="html-italic">ScDREB2B-1</span>. All data points were means ± standard error (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). Significant differences were found between different letter substitutes on the column calculated by Duncan’s new multiple range test (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Determination of abscisic acid (ABA) content and expression of its response gene <span class="html-italic">NbNCED</span> in transgenic <span class="html-italic">Nicotiana benthamiana</span> plants overexpressed the <span class="html-italic">ScDREB2B-1</span> gene under drought stress for 2 d. (<b>A</b>) ABA content. (<b>B</b>) Relative expression level of ABA responsive gene <span class="html-italic">NbNCED</span>. WT: wild-type <span class="html-italic">N. benthamiana</span>. OE1 and OE2: different transgenic <span class="html-italic">N. benthamiana</span> lines overexpressed <span class="html-italic">ScDREB2B-1</span>. All data points were means ± standard error (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). Significant differences were found between different letter substitutes on the column calculated by Duncan’s new multiple range test (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Determination of physiological index and expression level of stress-related genes in transgenic <span class="html-italic">Nicotiana benthamiana</span> plants overexpressed the <span class="html-italic">ScDREB2B-1</span> gene under drought stress for 2 d. (<b>A</b>) Activities of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). (<b>B</b>) Relative expression level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) synthase-related genes <span class="html-italic">NbRbohA</span> and <span class="html-italic">NbRbohB</span>. (<b>C</b>) Relative expression level of osmotic stress-related genes <span class="html-italic">NbERD</span> and <span class="html-italic">NbLEA</span>. WT: wild-type <span class="html-italic">N. benthamiana</span>. OE1 and OE2: different transgenic <span class="html-italic">N. benthamiana</span> lines overexpressed <span class="html-italic">ScDREB2B-1</span>. All data points were means ± standard error (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). Significant differences were found between different letter substitutes on the column calculated by Duncan’s new multiple range test (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Proposed working model for the sugarcane <span class="html-italic">ScDREB2B-1</span> overexpression-mediated regulation of <span class="html-italic">Nicotiana benthamiana</span> under drought stress. <span class="html-italic">NbNCED</span>: nine-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene; ABA: abscisic acid; <span class="html-italic">NbERD</span>: early responsive to dehydration gene; <span class="html-italic">NbLEA</span>: late-embryogenesis-abundant protein; <span class="html-italic">NbRbohB</span>: respiratory burst oxidase homolog protein B; CAT: catalase; POD: peroxidase; SOD: superoxide dismutase; ROS: reactive oxygen species. The up arrow indicated that the detected physiological and biochemical indexes and gene expression level in the transgenic plants were higher than that in the wild-type plants under drought stress.</p>
Full article ">
33 pages, 40409 KiB  
Article
In Silico Characterisation of the Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) Protein Families and Their Role in Desiccation Tolerance in Ramonda serbica Panc
by Ana Pantelić, Strahinja Stevanović, Sonja Milić Komić, Nataša Kilibarda and Marija Vidović
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(7), 3547; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073547 - 24 Mar 2022
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3494
Abstract
Ramonda serbica Panc. is an ancient resurrection plant able to survive a long desiccation period and recover metabolic functions upon watering. The accumulation of protective late embryogenesis abundant proteins (LEAPs) is a desiccation tolerance hallmark. To propose their role in R. serbica desiccation [...] Read more.
Ramonda serbica Panc. is an ancient resurrection plant able to survive a long desiccation period and recover metabolic functions upon watering. The accumulation of protective late embryogenesis abundant proteins (LEAPs) is a desiccation tolerance hallmark. To propose their role in R. serbica desiccation tolerance, we structurally characterised LEAPs and evaluated LEA gene expression levels in hydrated and desiccated leaves. By integrating de novo transcriptomics and homologues LEAP domains, 318 R. serbica LEAPs were identified and classified according to their conserved motifs and phylogeny. The in silico analysis revealed that hydrophilic LEA4 proteins exhibited an exceptionally high tendency to form amphipathic α-helices. The most abundant, atypical LEA2 group contained more hydrophobic proteins predicted to fold into the defined globular domains. Within the desiccation-upregulated LEA genes, the majority encoded highly disordered DEH1, LEA1, LEA4.2, and LEA4.3 proteins, while the greatest portion of downregulated genes encoded LEA2.3 and LEA2.5 proteins. While dehydrins might chelate metals and bind DNA under water deficit, other intrinsically disordered LEAPs might participate in forming intracellular proteinaceous condensates or adopt amphipathic α-helical conformation, enabling them to stabilise desiccation-sensitive proteins and membranes. This comprehensive LEAPs structural characterisation is essential to understanding their function and regulation during desiccation aiming at crop drought tolerance improvement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Macromolecules)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Percentage of selected amino acids and Gly versus GRAVY index plot in <italic>R. serbica</italic> LEA protein family members. The distribution of hydrophilins is highlighted in grey in the Gly/GRAVY plot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>MEME motifs and motif logos of representative LEAPs of each <italic>R. serbica</italic> LEA protein family group and subgroup. The numbers in the parentheses present the RsLEAP code (see <xref ref-type="app" rid="app1-ijms-23-03547">Supplementary Tables S2 and S3</xref>). The consensus and logo sequences of each motif are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="ijms-23-03547-t003">Table 3</xref>. The numbers at the end of each protein sequence present a percentage of LEAPs with the same motif pattern in the respective LEA protein family group. The bar represents 100 aa.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Average distribution of the predicted secondary structure of each <italic>R. serbica</italic> LEA protein family group and subgroup members according to the five secondary structure prediction algorithms: PsiPred, Sopma, FELLS, Phyre2, and JPred4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Modelling of the α-helix structure within detected MEME motifs in R. serbica LEA protein family members. Helical projections of α-helices were generated using the HeliQuest webserver [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47-ijms-23-03547">47</xref>]. αH; predicted α-helix percentages obtained by FELLS. Each wheel was obtained with an 11-amino acid window. The arrow shows the helical hydrophobic moment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Three-dimensional models of the representative LEAPs of each <italic>R. serbica</italic> LEA protein family group. Detected MEME motifs are denoted in blue. The RsLEA code for each protein is given. Orange: transmembrane α-helix, TMH.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Repartition of the <italic>R. serbica</italic> LEAP-predicted subcellular distribution in each family (sub)group. Results are given in percentages. Chl, chloroplast; mito, mitochondrion; nucl, nucleus; pero, peroxisomes; cysk, cytoskeleton; cyto, cytosol; ext, extracellular space; golg, Golgi apparatus, E.R. endoplasmic reticulum; plas, plastids.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 1714 KiB  
Article
Modular Assembly of Ordered Hydrophilic Proteins Improve Salinity Tolerance in Escherichia coli
by Leizhou Guo, Mingming Zhao, Yin Tang, Jiahui Han, Yuan Gui, Jiaming Ge, Shijie Jiang, Qilin Dai, Wei Zhang, Min Lin, Zhengfu Zhou and Jin Wang
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(9), 4482; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094482 - 25 Apr 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2828
Abstract
Most late embryogenesis abundant group 3 (G3LEA) proteins are highly hydrophilic and disordered, which can be transformed into ordered α-helices to play an important role in responding to diverse stresses in numerous organisms. Unlike most G3LEA proteins, DosH derived from Dinococcus radiodurans is [...] Read more.
Most late embryogenesis abundant group 3 (G3LEA) proteins are highly hydrophilic and disordered, which can be transformed into ordered α-helices to play an important role in responding to diverse stresses in numerous organisms. Unlike most G3LEA proteins, DosH derived from Dinococcus radiodurans is a naturally ordered G3LEA protein, and previous studies have found that the N-terminal domain (position 1–103) of DosH protein is the key region for its folding into an ordered secondary structure. Synthetic biology provides the possibility for artificial assembling ordered G3LEA proteins or their analogues. In this report, we used the N-terminal domain of DosH protein as module A (named DS) and the hydrophilic domains (DrHD, BnHD, CeHD, and YlHD) of G3LEA protein from different sources as module B, and artificially assembled four non-natural hydrophilic proteins, named DS + DrHD, DS + BnHD, DS + CeHD, and DS + YlHD, respectively. Circular dichroism showed that the four hydrophile proteins were highly ordered proteins, in which the α-helix contents were DS + DrHD (56.1%), DS + BnHD (53.7%), DS + CeHD (49.1%), and DS + YLHD (64.6%), respectively. Phenotypic analysis showed that the survival rate of recombinant Escherichia coli containing ordered hydrophilic protein was more than 10% after 4 h treatment with 1.5 M NaCl, which was much higher than that of the control group. Meanwhile, in vivo enzyme activity results showed that they had higher activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase, lactate dehydrogenase and less malondialdehyde production. Based on these results, the N-terminal domain of DosH protein can be applied in synthetic biology due to the fact that it can change the order of hydrophilic domains, thus increasing stress resistance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Informatics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>CD analysis of hydrophilic proteins. (<b>A</b>) The secondary structure of four non-natural hydrophilic proteins (<b>B</b>) and hydrophilic domain proteins in phosphate buffer. Percentages of a random coil (white), beta-Turn (dark grey), parallel (grey), antiparallel (light grey), and α-helix (red) are deduced from CD spectra using the CDNN program.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Survival phenotype plate assay of <span class="html-italic">E. coli</span> recombinant strains under high salt condition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Total antioxidant capacity analysis. (<b>A</b>) Analysis of total antioxidant capacity of recombinant strains BL21-DS + DrHD and BL21-DrHD. (<b>B</b>) Analysis of total antioxidant capacity of recombinant strains BL21-DS + BnHD and BL21-BnHD. (<b>C</b>) Analysis of total antioxidant capacity of recombinant strains BL21-DS + CeHD and BL21-CeHD. (<b>D</b>) Analysis of total antioxidant capacity of recombinant strains BL21-DS + YlHD and BL21-YlHD. The symbols ‘ns’, ‘*’, ‘**’ and ‘***’, respectively, represent ‘no significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05)’, ‘a significant difference (0.01 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05)’, ‘an extremely significant difference (0.001 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01)’, and ‘the most significant difference (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001)’.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Superoxide dismutase activity analysis. (<b>A</b>) Analysis of superoxide dismutase activity of recombinant strains BL21-DS + DrHD and BL21-DrHD. (<b>B</b>) Analysis of superoxide dismutase activity of recombinant strains BL21-DS + BnHD and BL21-BnHD. (<b>C</b>) Analysis of superoxide dismutase activity of recombinant strains BL21-DS + CeHD and BL21-CeHD. (<b>D</b>) Analysis of superoxide dismutase activity of recombinant strains BL21-DS + YlHD and BL21-YlHD. The symbols ‘ns’, ‘**’ and ‘***’, respectively, represent ‘no significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05)’, ‘a significant difference (0.01 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05)’, ‘an extremely significant difference (0.001 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01)’, and ‘the most significant difference (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001)’.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Lactate dehydrogenase activity analysis. (<b>A</b>) Analysis of lactate dehydrogenase activity of recombinant strains BL21-DS + DrHD and BL21-DrHD. (<b>B</b>) Analysis of lactate dehydrogenase activity of recombinant strains BL21-DS + BnHD and BL21-BnHD. (<b>C</b>) Analysis of lactate dehydrogenase activity of recombinant strains BL21-DS + CeHD and BL21-CeHD. (<b>D</b>) Analysis of lactate dehydrogenase activity of recombinant strains BL21-DS + YlHD and BL21-YlHD. The symbols ‘ns’ and ‘***’, respectively, represent ‘no significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05)’, ‘a significant difference (0.01 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05)’, ‘an extremely significant difference (0.001 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01)’, and ‘the most significant difference (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001)’.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Analysis of MDA production. (<b>A</b>) Analysis of MDA production of recombinant strains BL21-DS + DrHD and BL21-DrHD. (<b>B</b>) Analysis of MDA production of recombinant strains BL21-DS + BnHD and BL21-BnHD. (<b>C</b>) Analysis of MDA production of recombinant strains BL21-DS + CeHD and BL21-CeHD. (<b>D</b>) Analysis of MDA production of recombinant strains BL21-DS + YlHD and BL21-YlHD. The symbols ‘ns’, ‘*’, ‘**’ and ‘***’, respectively, represent ‘no significantly different (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05)’, ‘a significant difference (0.01 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05)’, ‘an extremely significant difference (0.001 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01)’, and ‘the most significant difference (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001)’.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 3544 KiB  
Article
Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of OsbZIP09 Target Genes in Rice Reveal Its Mechanism of Controlling Seed Germination
by Cheng-Chao Zhu, Chu-Xin Wang, Chen-Ya Lu, Jin-Dong Wang, Yu Zhou, Min Xiong, Chang-Quan Zhang, Qiao-Quan Liu and Qian-Feng Li
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(4), 1661; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041661 - 7 Feb 2021
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 4212
Abstract
Seed dormancy and germination are key events in plant development and are critical for crop production, and defects in seed germination or the inappropriate release of seed dormancy cause substantial losses in crop yields. Rice is the staple food for more than half [...] Read more.
Seed dormancy and germination are key events in plant development and are critical for crop production, and defects in seed germination or the inappropriate release of seed dormancy cause substantial losses in crop yields. Rice is the staple food for more than half of the world’s population, and preharvest sprouting (PHS) is one of the most severe problems in rice production, due to a low level of seed dormancy, especially under warm and damp conditions. Therefore, PHS leads to yield loss and a decrease in rice quality and vitality. We reveal that mutation of OsbZIP09 inhibited rice PHS. Analysis of the expression of OsbZIP09 and its encoded protein sequence and structure indicated that OsbZIP09 is a typical bZIP transcription factor that contains conserved bZIP domains, and its expression is induced by ABA. Moreover, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and DNA affinity purification sequencing (DAP-seq) analyses were performed and 52 key direct targets of OsbZIP09 were identified, including OsLOX2 and Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) family genes, which are involved in controlling seed germination. Most of these key targets showed consistent changes in expression in response to abscisic acid (ABA) treatment and OsbZIP09 mutation. The data characterize a number of key target genes that are directly regulated by OsbZIP09 and contribute to revealing the molecular mechanism that underlies how OsbZIP09 controls rice seed germination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomic Studies of Plant-Environment Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Knock-out of <span class="html-italic">OsbZIP09</span> inhibits rice pre-harvest sprouting (PHS). Phenotype (<b>A</b>) and germination rate (<b>B</b>) of mature rice panicles after 6 d imbibition in water. Scale bar, 2 cm. (<b>C</b>) Time-course analysis of seed germination under normal conditions. (<b>D</b>) Morphology of germinated seeds 96 h after imbibition (HAI). Scale bar, 0.5 cm. (<b>E</b>) Shoot length of germinated seeds 96 and 120 HAI. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 (<span class="html-italic">t</span>-test); NS: not significant.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Analysis of the phylogenetic relationships, protein sequence, and structure of bZIP09, and the expression pattern of <span class="html-italic">bZIP09</span>. (<b>A</b>) Phylogenetic tree of bZIP09 from different plant species. (<b>B</b>) Amino-acid sequence alignment of eight bZIP09 homologous proteins. Different homology levels were highlighted in different colors. Navy blue, 100%; pink, between 75% and 100%; light blue, between 50% and 75%. (<b>C</b>) Conserved amino-acids in the bZIP09 C terminal region. (<b>D</b>) Protein secondary structure analysis of the C terminal region of bZIP09. The conserved domain includes a continuous α-helical structure. (<b>E</b>) Analysis of the abscisic acid (ABA)-related <span class="html-italic">cis</span>-elements in the <span class="html-italic">OsbZIP09</span> promoter. (<b>F</b>) Expression of <span class="html-italic">OsbZIP09</span> in the wild-type (WT) in response to ABA (5 μM) treatment. ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01. <span class="html-italic">ACTIN</span> served as the internal reference gene for normalization. Values were obtained from three independent experiments. Data are shown as means ± SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>RNA-seq analyses of <span class="html-italic">osbzip09-</span>2 and ABA-treated wild-type rice. (<b>A</b>) Venn diagrams showing the overlap between genes up- or downregulated by ABA and in <span class="html-italic">osbzip09-</span>2. ABA up—ABA-upregulated genes; ABA down—ABA-downregulated genes; <span class="html-italic">osbzip09</span> up—upregulated genes in <span class="html-italic">osbzip09-</span>2; <span class="html-italic">osbzip09</span> down—downregulated genes in <span class="html-italic">osbzip09-</span>2. (<b>B</b>) Distribution of the top 10 biological process gene ontology (GO) terms for the common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of ABA treatment and <span class="html-italic">osbzip09-</span>2. (<b>C</b>) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways that were enriched among the common DEGs of ABA treatment and <span class="html-italic">OsbZIP09</span> mutation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>DAP-seq (DNA affinity purification sequencing) analysis of rice OsbZIP09. (<b>A</b>) Distribution of OsbZIP09-binding sites along the twelve chromosomes of rice. (<b>B</b>) Distribution of OsbZIP09-binding sites in genic and intergenic regions. (<b>C</b>) Biological process categorization of OsbZIP09-regulated target genes using gene ontology (GO) analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Identification and analysis of OsbZIP09 direct target genes responsive to ABA. (<b>A</b>) Venn diagrams showing the overlapping genes between the RNA-seq and DAP-seq data. (<b>B</b>) Hierarchical clustering analysis of the 52 common target genes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Validation of RNA-seq data for the representative common targets by qRT-PCR. (<b>A</b>) qRT-PCR for selected eight representative common targets. (<b>B</b>) Correlation of gene expression between qRT-PCR and RNA-seq data. Fold-change values were log<sub>2</sub> transformed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>OsbZIP09 controls seed germination by suppressing the expression of <span class="html-italic">Late Embryogenesis Abundant</span> (<span class="html-italic">LEA</span>) family genes and enhancing the expression of <span class="html-italic">OsLOX2</span>. (<b>A</b>) OsbZIP09-binding motif analysis in the promoter of <span class="html-italic">LEA25</span> and <span class="html-italic">LOX2</span>, respectively. (<b>B</b>) Schematic depiction of the reporter and effector constructs used in the dual-luciferase reporter assay. (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) OsbZIP09 suppresses the promoter activity of <span class="html-italic">LEA25</span> but activates the promoter activity of <span class="html-italic">LOX2</span>. Data are shown as means ± SD (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5). Statistically significant differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 are indicated by different letters.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 54937 KiB  
Article
Mining Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) Family Genes in Cleistogenes songorica, a Xerophyte Perennial Desert Plant
by Blaise Pascal Muvunyi, Qi Yan, Fan Wu, Xueyang Min, Zhuan Zhuan Yan, Gisele Kanzana, Yanrong Wang and Jiyu Zhang
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(11), 3430; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113430 - 1 Nov 2018
Cited by 33 | Viewed by 5354
Abstract
Plant growth and development depends on its ability to maintain optimal cellular homeostasis during abiotic and biotic stresses. Cleistogenes songorica, a xerophyte desert plant, is known to have novel drought stress adaptation strategies and contains rich pools of stress tolerance genes. Proteins [...] Read more.
Plant growth and development depends on its ability to maintain optimal cellular homeostasis during abiotic and biotic stresses. Cleistogenes songorica, a xerophyte desert plant, is known to have novel drought stress adaptation strategies and contains rich pools of stress tolerance genes. Proteins encoded by Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) family genes promote cellular activities by functioning as disordered molecules, or by limiting collisions between enzymes during stresses. To date, functions of the LEA family genes have been heavily investigated in many plant species except perennial monocotyledonous species. In this study, 44 putative LEA genes were identified in the C. songorica genome and were grouped into eight subfamilies, based on their conserved protein domains and domain organizations. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that C. songorica Dehydrin and LEA_2 subfamily proteins shared high sequence homology with stress responsive Dehydrin proteins from Arabidopsis. Additionally, promoter regions of CsLEA_2 or CsDehydrin subfamily genes were rich in G-box, drought responsive (MBS), and/or Abscisic acid responsive (ABRE) cis-regulatory elements. In addition, gene expression analyses indicated that genes from these two subfamilies were highly responsive to heat stress and ABA treatment, in both leaves and roots. In summary, the results from this study provided a comprehensive view of C. songorica LEA genes and the potential applications of these genes for the improvement of crop tolerance to abiotic stresses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Genomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Phylogenetic analysis of <span class="html-italic">C. songorica</span> LEA proteins. Full-length amino acid sequences of the 44 CsLEA proteins were analyzed using the unrooted method in the ClustalW software.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Motif structure and exon–intron organizations of the 44 CsLEA genes. The 18 motifs discovered in this study are shown on these <span class="html-italic">CsLEA</span> genes (<b>left</b>). The blue boxes represent exons and the blue lines represent introns (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Multiple sequence alignment using <span class="html-italic">C. songorica</span> and Arabidopsis Dehydrin protein sequences. The identified Y segment, K segment and S segment are indicated by different colors. Y segment = red, K segment = green and S segment = purple.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Locations of the 44 <span class="html-italic">CsLEA</span> genes on 15 chromosomes of <span class="html-italic">C. songorica</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Hierarchical clustering of <span class="html-italic">CsLEA</span> gene expression profiles in root and shoot tissues after 24 h heat or ABA treatment. The log transformed values for the relative expressions of <span class="html-italic">CsLEA</span> genes were used for the hierarchical clustering analysis. The blue scale means low transcript expression and the red scale means high transcript expression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Hierarchical clustering of <span class="html-italic">CsLEA</span> gene expression profiles in root and shoot tissues after 24 h heat or ABA treatment. The log transformed values for the relative expressions of <span class="html-italic">CsLEA</span> genes were used for the hierarchical clustering analysis. The blue scale means low transcript expression and the red scale means high transcript expression.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop