Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Next Article in Journal
Is Omega-3 Fatty Acids Enriched Nutrition Support Safe for Critical Ill Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of a Validated Food Frequency Questionnaire for Self-Defined Vegans in the United States
Previous Article in Journal
Antioxidant Activity in Extracts of 27 Indigenous Taiwanese Vegetables
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vitamin B12-Containing Plant Food Sources for Vegetarians
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 6
Issue 6
10.3390/nu6062131
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Beyond Meatless, the Health Effects of Vegan Diets: Findings from the Adventist Cohorts

by
Lap Tai Le
and
Joan Sabaté
*
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, CA 92350, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2014, 6(6), 2131-2147; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6062131
Submission received: 3 April 2014 / Revised: 17 May 2014 / Accepted: 20 May 2014 / Published: 27 May 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vegan diets and Human health)
Browse Figure
Graphical abstract
"> Graphical abstract
">
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Vegetarians, those who avoid meat, and vegans, additionally avoiding dairy and eggs, represent 5% and 2%, respectively, of the US population. The aim of this review is to assess the effects of vegetarian diets, particularly strict vegetarian diets (i.e., vegans) on health and disease outcomes. We summarized available evidence from three prospective cohorts of Adventists in North America: Adventist Mortality Study, Adventist Health Study, and Adventist Health Study-2. Non-vegetarian diets were compared to vegetarian dietary patterns (i.e., vegan and lacto-ovo-vegetarian) on selected health outcomes. Vegetarian diets confer protection against cardiovascular diseases, cardiometabolic risk factors, some cancers and total mortality. Compared to lacto-ovo-vegetarian diets, vegan diets seem to offer additional protection for obesity, hypertension, type-2 diabetes, and cardiovascular mortality. Males experience greater health benefits than females. Limited prospective data is available on vegetarian diets and body weight change. Large randomized intervention trials on the effects of vegetarian diet patterns on neurological and cognitive functions, obesity, diabetes, and other cardiovascular outcomes are warranted to make meaningful recommendations.

Graphical Abstract">

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

A recent Gallup Poll conducted in July 2012 reported that 5% of the American adult population is vegetarian. Only 2% reported adopting a vegan diet, in that they abstain from meat, fish, dairy, and eggs [1]. The attitudes towards vegetarianism have gained better acceptance; however, the percentage of Americans who consider themselves to be vegetarians is largely unchanged since 2001. For many individuals, the choice for adopting a vegetarian diet stems from various reasons including religious and ethical considerations [2], environmental impacts [3], and health benefits of a plant-based diet [4,5]. About three decades ago, the position statement of American Dietetic Association showed reasonable doubts about the nutritional adequacy and benefits of vegetarian diets [6]. However, the committee has changed its positions on vegetarian dietary recommendations [4,7]. This is the results of much research on vegetarian diets in the past 30 years. The increased number of publications on vegetarian nutrition and major contributions in nutritional epidemiology have contributed to better understanding of the connections between diet and disease [8]. In particular, studies of Adventists have provided compelling evidence that well-balanced vegetarian diets are nutritionally adequate, and associated with lower risk of chronic diseases [4].
Probably, the first thoughtful investigation on vegetarian diets was conducted by Mervyn G. Hardinge as a doctoral dissertation at Harvard in the early 1950s [9,10,11]. His research was initially met with resistance [12], but later became the founding Dean of Loma Linda University School of Public Health. His novel thinking opened up new hypotheses for subsequent research into vegetarian diets. Notably, the prospective epidemiological studies of Adventists, many of whom are vegetarians—vegans, lacto-ovo-vegetarians, semi-vegetarians, pesco-vegetarians; and about half adheres to omnivorous diets similarly to that of the general population [13]. Members of the Seventh-day Adventist religious denomination exhibits a variety of dietary habits, with a strong emphasis on health. Church doctrines recommend vegetarian practices and abstinence from the use of tobacco and alcohol. The range of diets consumed by Adventists is broad and distinct from the typical Western diets. Thus, this presents an ideal opportunity to compare various vegetarian dietary patterns, while controlling for known non-dietary confounders, such as the use of alcohol and tobacco [14].
The aim of this review is to assess the health and disease outcomes of vegetarian diets with regards to chronic diseases. Are the health effects of those who adhere to strict vegetarian (i.e., vegan) and lacto-ovo-vegetarian diets differ from non-vegetarians? Thus, the purpose of this review is to summarize available evidence from the Adventist cohorts of potential health effects for vegan and lacto-ovo-vegetarian diets on disease and mortality; and to discuss the limitations of these diets in order to provide practical dietary recommendations.

2. Methods

In order to identify relevant articles, we conducted an independent literature review using PubMed/Medline and EMBASE databases through 28 January, 2014. The following search terms were used: “Adventist vegetarian health” (49 articles); “vegan Adventist health” (46 articles); “Adventist vegetarian cancer” (32 articles); “Adventist health BMI” (28 articles); “Adventist mortality vegetarian” (16 articles); “lacto-ovo-vegetarian Adventist” (11 articles); “Adventist health study dietary pattern” (8 articles); “Adventist vegetarian diabetes” (6 articles); and “dietary patterns Adventist mortality” (3 articles). Additionally, we cross-referenced the articles with the Adventist Health Study database of 348 articles. For the purpose of this study, only relevant articles were included using the following inclusion criteria: (1) large prospective cohort studies of Adventists; (2) reports with clearly defined dietary patterns as exposures; and (3) data of vegetarians compared to non-vegetarians (lacto-ovo-vegetarians and/or vegans) on cardiometabolic factors, cancer-related sites, and/or mortality. Exclusion criteria were: animal studies, case studies with small sample size, studies of Adventists outside of the US and Canada; studies reporting only nutrients, foods, and food groups as dietary exposures; and studies not reporting relevant health outcomes.
After careful review of thirteen articles relevant to the aim of this report, data were abstracted and tabulated according to pre-established criteria, related to the classification of the dietary patterns (Table 1), and characteristics of the study cohorts (Table 2). Eight articles were included in the comparisons between vegetarians and non-vegetarians for cardio-metabolic factors (Table 3), cancer-related sites (Table 4), and mortality (Table 5). Six articles were included in the review for lacto-ovo-vegetarians and vegans compared to non-vegetarians on cardiometabolic factors (Table 6), cancer-related sites (Table 7), and mortality (Table 8). The results extracted from these studies used various parameter estimates including means and standard deviation (SD), odd ratio (OR), relative risk (RR), hazard ratio (HR), and standard mortality ratio (SMR). Most studies reported results using the non-vegetarian group as the reference. In order to unify the results across all studies, reciprocal of the parameter estimates and confidence intervals were calculated with non-vegetarian group as the reference. In this report, we adhered to the commonly used definitions of vegetarian dietary patterns in the Adventist Health Study cohorts, as summarized in Table 1. Results are presented in a tabular format.
Table
Table 1. Classification of dietary patterns *.
Table 1. Classification of dietary patterns *.
Dietary PatternDefinitionBeefPoultry/FishDairy/Eggs
Non-vegetarianEat red meat, poultry, fish, milk, and eggs more than once a week Nutrients 06 02131 i001 Nutrients 06 02131 i002 Nutrients 06 02131 i003
Semi-vegetarianEat red meat, poultry, and fish less than once per week and more than once per month Nutrients 06 02131 i004 Nutrients 06 02131 i005 Nutrients 06 02131 i003
Vegetarian
Pesco-Eat fish, milk, and eggs but no red meat nor poultry Nutrients 06 02131 i006 Nutrients 06 02131 i007 Nutrients 06 02131 i003
Lacto-ovo-Eat eggs, milk, or both but no red meat, fish, nor poultry Nutrients 06 02131 i006 Nutrients 06 02131 i006 Nutrients 06 02131 i003
VeganEat no red meat, fish, poultry, dairy, and eggs Nutrients 06 02131 i006 Nutrients 06 02131 i006 Nutrients 06 02131 i006
* Adapted from Gary E. Fraser [15].
Three separate prospective Adventist cohort studies, whose dietary practice and health outcomes of participants were followed. The first major Seventh-day Adventist prospective cohort study was called the California Adventist Mortality Study (AMS) [14,15,16]. This study was followed-up to disease mortality collected between 1960 and 1976, from 22,940 participants, of which 64.6% were females. The subsequent cohort study of Adventists was the Adventist Health Study-1 (AHS-1) [17], which started in 1976 to 1988 at the end of follow-up. It was designed to assess diet-disease associations and collect fatal and non-fatal incident events from 34,198 participants living in California, ages 25–90 years. The third and on-going prospective cohort study was the Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2) [14]. AHS-2 began in 2002 with the aim to evaluate the role of diets and lifestyle factors that may be involved in cancer-related outcomes. This is a cohort of more than 96,000 participants from US and Canada, ages 30–112 years [14]. Dietary data were measured at baseline using self-administered food frequency questionnaire to assess usual dietary intake, and types of dietary pattern were defined. Cancer cases were identified and matched with state tumor registries. Morality data were obtained from the National Death Index. Table 2 summarizes the basic characteristics of the Adventist cohorts by location, subjects (n), age range (years), years of follow-up (years), outcomes of interest, and study design methodology, as detailed by Butler et al. [14,15,18,19,20].
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of Adventist Mortality Study (AMS), Adventist Health Study-1 (AHS-1), and Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2).
Table 2. Characteristics of Adventist Mortality Study (AMS), Adventist Health Study-1 (AHS-1), and Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2).
SourcesLocationNumber of Subjects (n)Age Range (years)Years of Follow-Up (years)Outcomes of InterestStudy Design
Adventist Mortality Study (AMS) [16]California22,940 64.6% Female35–901960–1976Disease MortalityProspective
Adventist Health Study-1 (AHS-1) [17]California34,198 60.1% Female25–901976–1982 (incidence)
1976–1988 (mortality)		Disease incidence & mortalityProspective
Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2) [14]50 U.S. States & Canada96,194 65.1% Female30–1122002–(ongoing)Disease Incidence & moralityProspective
Adventist Cohorts and Study Participants

3. Results

For more than 96,000 participants from AHS-2 cohort, 48% were non-vegetarians, 6% were semi-vegetarians, 10% were pesco-vegetarians, 28% were lacto-ovo-vegetarians, and 8% were vegans at baseline. Table 3 presents cardiometabolic risk factors comparing vegetarian and non-vegetarian Adventists. For BMI, vegetarians were approximately 2–4 points lower than non-vegetarians. After adjusted for relevant confounders, vegetarians had 55% lower odds of developing hypertension. The odds of developing type-2 diabetes was 25% to 49% lower for vegetarians compared to non-vegetarians in different cohorts. The odds of developing metabolic syndrome (MetS) for vegetarians were about half compared to non-vegetarians.
Table
Table 3. Cardiometabolic factors among vegetarian and non-vegetarian Adventists.
Table 3. Cardiometabolic factors among vegetarian and non-vegetarian Adventists.
Cardiometabolic FactorPerson at-RiskNo. of EventsParameter EstimatesNon-VegetarianVegetarianCohort(s) & References
Mean or OR (95% CI)
BMI [a],*
  Men
  Women		34,192-Mean, kg/m226.2 (26.1, 26.4)
25.9 (25.8, 26.0)		24.3 (24.1, 24.4)
23.7 (23.6, 23.9)		AHS-1 [21]
BMI [a],* 773-Mean, kg/m229.6 (29.0, 30.3)25.9 (25.2, 26.6)AHS-2 [22]
Hypertension [b],‡
  Men
  Women		34,192-OR1 [referent]0.45 (0.40, 0.51)
0.45 (0.41, 0.49)		AHS-1 [21]
Diabetes [b], ‡
  Men
  Women		34,192-OR1 [referent]0.51 (0.40, 0.64)
0.52 (0.44, 0.64)		AHS-1 [21]
Diabetes Mellitus [c],♠8401543OR1 [referent]0.75 (0.57, 0.97)AMS & AHS-1 [23]
Metabolic Syndrome [d],†773-OR1 [referent]0.44 (0.30, 0.64)AHS-2 [22]
Non-vegetarian is used as the referent group for comparison. OR = odd ratio; [a] Adjusted for age and diet status, * p = 0.0001; [b] Adjusted for age. Significantly different from non-vegetarians. ‡ p = 0.0001; [c] Multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, and BMI; ♠ p < 0.005; [d] Logistic regression analysis adjusted for sex, ethnicity, smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, and dietary energy intake; † p < 0.001.
Table 4 presents results comparing risks of all-cancer and cancer-specific sites between vegetarian and non-vegetarian Adventists. Vegetarians experienced a modest, 8% risk reduction for overall-cancer. For cancer-specific sites, vegetarians had approximately half the risk of developing colon cancer. Also, vegetarians had 23% risk reduction for cancer of the gastrointestinal tract. Vegetarians experienced a 35% risk reduction for prostate cancer compared to non-vegetarians. Similarly, vegetarians tended to have lower risk for cancer of the respiratory tract and overall-cancer. No significant differences between the diet groups were found for other site-specific cancers including lung, breast, and uterine.
Table
Table 4. All-cancer and cancer-specific sites among vegetarian and non-vegetarian Adventists.
Table 4. All-cancer and cancer-specific sites among vegetarian and non-vegetarian Adventists.
Cancer SitesPerson at-RiskNo. of EventsParameter EstimatesNon-vegetarianVegetarianCohort(s) & References
RR or HR (95% CI)
Colon [a],* 34,198107RR1 [referent]0.55 (0.35, 0.81)AHS-1 [21]
Colon [b],†34,198166RR1 [referent]0.39 (0.19, 0.83)AHS-1 [24]
Gastrointestinal Tract [c],♠69,120495HR1 [referent]0.77 (0.63, 0.93)AHS-2 [20]
Lung [h]34,19845RR1 [referent]0.86 (0.42, 1.79)AHS-1 [21]
Respiratory Tract [c]69,120170HR1 [referent]0.75 (0.54, 1.04)AHS-2 [20]
Urinary Tract [c]69,120194HR1 [referent]1.21 (0.89, 1.65)AHS-2 [20]
All-male Cancer [d]24,446553HR1 [referent]0.94 (0.42, 2.07)
Prostate [a]34,198127RR1 [referent]0.65 (0.44, 0.95)AHS-1 [21]
All-female Cancer [e]44,674801HR1 [referent]0.97 (0.84, 1.13)AHS-2 [20]
Breast [a]34,198128RR1 [referent]0.80 (0.56, 1.15)AHS-1 [21]
Uterine [a]34,1981.16RR1 [referent]0.85 (0.58, 1.23)
Overall-Cancer [f],‡69,1202939HR1 [referent]0.92 (0.85, 1.00)AHS-2 [20]
  Males [g]24,4461235HR1 [referent]0.92 (0.81, 1.03)
  Females [f]44,6741704HR1 [referent]0.93 (0.84, 1.03)
All-female cancer includes female breast, vulva, vagina, cervix uteri, corpus uteri, endometrial, uterus, and ovary. Cancer of the gastrointestinal tract includes esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, liver and bile ducts, gallbladder, biliary tract, and pancreas. All-male cancer includes prostate, penis, and testis. Cancer of the respiratory tract and intra-thoracic organs include nasal cavity, middle ear, larynx, trachea, bronchus, lung, heart, mediastinum, and pleura. Cancer of the urinary tract includes renal pelvis, ureter, kidney, and bladder. RR = relative risk; HR = hazard ratio. [a] Adjusted for age and sex; * p = 0.0032; [b] Adjusted for age, sex, and parental history of colon cancer; and relative to vegetarians with legume intake of <1 time/week; † p = 0.03; [c] Multivariate HR model adjusted for age, family history of cancer, education, smoking, alcohol, and BMI; ♠ p < 0.05; [d] Multivariate HR model adjusted for age, family history of cancer, education, smoking, and alcohol. Applicable only for male-specific cancer; [e] Multivariate HR model adjusted by race, family history of cancer, education, smoking, alcohol, age at menarche, pregnancies, breastfeeding, oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy, menopause status, and BMI; [f] HR adjusted by race, family history of cancer, BMI, education, smoking, alcohol, age at menarche, pregnancies, breastfeeding, oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy, and menopause status; ‡ p = 0.05; [g] HR adjusted by race, family history of cancer, BMI, education, smoking, and alcohol; [h] Adjusted for age, sex, and for past and present smoking.
Table 5 presents all-cause and cause-specific mortality comparing vegetarians to non-vegetarians. In all three cohorts, vegetarians experienced a 10% to 20% decreased in all-cause mortality. Similarly, vegetarians had 26% to 68% lower risks of mortality from ischemic heart disease, cardiovascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease. Vegetarians experienced a 48% risk reduction in mortality from breast cancer, and modest risks reduction from other-cause total mortality. No significant risks reduction in cause-specific mortality were found among vegetarians, particularly for cancers of the stomach, colorectal, lung, and prostate.
Table 6 presents cardiometabolic-related factors comparing vegan and lacto-ovo-vegetarian Adventists to the non-vegetarian counterparts. Lacto-ovo-vegetarians and vegans had respectively, 3 and 5 points lower BMI than non-vegetarians. For hypertension, lacto-ovo-vegetarians experienced 55% lower risks; whereas, vegans had 75% risks reduction when compared to non-vegetarians. Similarly, lacto-ovo-vegetarian and vegan were associated with lower risks of type-2 diabetes. The risks reduction of diabetes for lacto-ovo-vegetarians varied between 38% and 61%; and 47% to 78% for vegans. When stratified by ethnicity, the relative risks reduction for diabetes was greater in blacks than non-blacks when compared with their non-vegetarian counterparts. For all cardiometabolic-related outcomes, vegans had lower risk than lacto-ovo-vegetarians compared to non-vegetarians.
Table 7 presents all-cancer and site-specific cancers for vegan and lacto-ovo-vegetarian Adventists compared to non-vegetarians. Overall, vegans experienced modest risks reduction (14%) for all-cancer, but not significant for lacto-ovo-vegetarians. When stratified by gender, no significant differences were observed in the hazard ratio for all-cancer in vegans. Conversely, lacto-ovo-vegetarians conferred 24% risks reduction for cancer of the gastrointestinal tract, but not significant for vegans. Vegans experienced 73% higher risk for urinary tract cancer compared to non-vegetarians. Neither vegans nor lacto-ovo-vegetarians had significant risks reduction for cancer of the respiratory tract.
Table
Table 5. All-cause and cause-specific mortality among vegetarian and non-vegetarian Adventists.
Table 5. All-cause and cause-specific mortality among vegetarian and non-vegetarian Adventists.
Cause-Specific MortalityPerson at-RiskNo. of EventsParameter EstimatesNon-Vegetarian Vegetarian Cohort(s) & References
SMR, RR, or HR (95% CI)
All-cause [a],*24,5381635SMR1 [referent]0.83 (0.76, 0.92)AMS[25]
All-cause [a],* 28,9523564SMR1 [referent]0.80 (0.74, 0.87)AHS-1
All-cause [b],‡73,3082560HR1 [referent]0.88 (0.80, 0.97)AHS-2[19]
  Males [b],‡25,1051031HR1 [referent]0.82 (0.72, 0.94)
  Females [b]48,2031529HR1 [referent]0.93 (0.82, 1.05)
Ischemic Heart Disease [a],*24,538598SMR1 [referent]0.74 (0.63, 0.88)AMS[25]
  Males [c],♠819533RR1 [referent]0.32 (0.13, 0.89)AMS[26]
  Females [d]14,888211RR1 [referent]0.83 (0.37, 2.63)
Ischemic Heart Disease [a],*28,952921SMR1 [referent]0.62 (0.53, 0.73)AHS-1[25]
Ischemic heart disease [b]73,308372HR1 [referent]0.81 (0.64, 1.02)AHS-2[19]
Cardiovascular Disease [b]73,308987HR1 [referent]0.87 (0.75, 1.01)
  Males [b],‡25,105390HR1 [referent]0.71 (0.57, 0.90)
  Females [b]48,203597HR1 [referent]0.99 (0.83, 1.18)
Cerebrovascular Disease [a],*24,538182SMR1 [referent]0.65 (0.48, 0.87)AMS[25]
Cerebrovascular Disease [a]28,952317SMR1 [referent]0.93 (0.73, 1.19)AHS-1
All-cancer [b]73,308706HR1 [referent]0.92 (0.78, 1.08)AHS-2[19]
Stomach [a]24,53830SMR1 [referent]0.64 (0.30, 1.36)AMS[25]
Stomach [a]28,95226SMR1 [referent]1.58 (0.68, 3.70)AHS-1
Colorectal [a]24,53841SMR1 [referent]1.37 (0.73, 2.56)AMS
Colorectal [a]28,952104SMR1 [referent]1.01 (0.66, 1.56)AHS-1
Lung [a]24,5386SMR1 [referent]0.59 (0.10, 3.28)AMS
Lung [a]28,95296SMR1 [referent]0.69 (0.37, 1.27)AHS-1
Breast [a]24,53826SMR1 [referent]0.65 (0.28, 1.52)AMS
Breast [a],*28,95264SMR1 [referent]0.52 (0.27, 0.97)AHS-1
Prostate [a]24,53815SMR1 [referent]1.41 (0.49, 4.04)AMS
Prostate [a]28,95266SMR1 [referent]0.79 (0.44, 1.41)AHS-1
Other-cause [a]24,538737SMR1 [referent]0.96 (0.83, 1.11)AMS
Other-cause [a],*28,9521970SMR1 [referent]0.88 (0.79, 0.97)AHS-1
Other-cause [b]73,308867HR1 [referent]0.85 (0.73-0.99)AHS-2[19]
Non-vegetarian is the referent group. RR = relative risk; SMR = standard mortality ratio; HR = hazard ratio; [a] Adjusted for age, sex, and smoking status; death rate ratio (SMR); * p < 0.05, statistically significant; [b] Adjusted by age (i.e., attained age as time variable), race (black, nonblack), smoking, exercise, personal income, educational level, marital status, alcohol, region, and sleep. Also adjusted by sex, menopause, and hormone therapy. Other-cause includes non-CVD and non-cancer; ‡ p < 0.05; [c] Adjusted for age and current dietary habits, 1960 to 1965; for males ages 35–64; RR = SMR in non-vegetarians/SMR in vegetarians; ♠ p = 0.0084; [d] Adjusted for age and current dietary habits, 1960 to 1965; for females ages 35–74.
Table
Table 6. Cardiometabolic-related factors among vegan and lacto-ovo-vegetarian Adventists.
Table 6. Cardiometabolic-related factors among vegan and lacto-ovo-vegetarian Adventists.
Cardio-Metabolic FactorsPerson at-RiskNo. of EventsParameter EstimatesLacto-ovo-VegetarianVeganCohort(s) & References
Mean, RR, or OR (95% CI)
Body mass index [a],*89,224-Mean25.5 (25.4, 25.5)23.1 (23.0, 23.2)AHS-2 [27]
Body mass index [c],‡60,903-Mean ± SD25.7 ± 5.123.6 ± 4.4AHS-2 [16]
Hypertension [a],*89,224-RR0.45 (0.44, 0.47)0.25 (0.22, 0.28)AHS-2 [27]
Hypertension [b],†500-OR0.86 (0.51, 1.45)0.53 (0.25, 1.11)AHS-2 [18]
Diabetes [a],*89,224-RR0.39 (0.36, 0.42)0.22 (0.18, 0.28)AHS-2 [27]
Type-2 Diabetes [c],‡60,9033394OR0.54 (0.49, 0.60)0.51 (0.40, 0.66)AHS-2 [16]
Diabetes Mellitus [d],♠41,387616OR0.62 (0.50, 0.76)0.38 (0.24, 0.62)AHS-2 [28]
Non-blacks [d],♠34,215-OR0.68 (0.54, 0.86)0.43 (0.25, 0.74)
Blacks [d],♠7172-OR0.47 (0.27, 0.83)0.30 (0.11, 0.84)
Non-vegetarian is the referent group. RR = relative risk; OR = odd ratio; [a] Adjusted for age, sex, and race. Body mass index (BMI) for non-vegetarians [reference] was 28.26 (28.22, 28.30); * p = 0.0001; [b] Adjusted for age, gender and BMI. Hypertension defined as average systolic blood pressure >139 mmHg or average diastolic blood pressure >89 mmHg or taking antihypertensive medications; † p = 0.0001; [c] Adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, education, income, physical activity, television watching, sleep habits, alcohol use, and BMI. Body mass index (BMI) for non-vegetarians referent group was 28.8 ± 6.3; ‡ p = 0.0001; [d] Adjusted for age, gender, BMI, lifestyle, sleep habits, physical activity, alcohol use, ethnicity, income, and education. Type-1 diabetes were excluded; ♠ p < 0.05, statistically significant.
Table
Table 7. All-cancer and site-specific cancers among vegan and lacto-ovo-vegetarian Adventists.
Table 7. All-cancer and site-specific cancers among vegan and lacto-ovo-vegetarian Adventists.
Cancer-Specific SitesPerson at-RiskNo. of EventsParameter EstimatesLacto-ovo-VegetarianVeganCohort(s) & References
HR (95% CI)
All-Cancer [a],*69,1201068HR0.95 (0.86, 1.04)0.86 (0.73, 1.00)AHS-2 [20]
  Males [b]24,446457HR0.92 (0.80, 1.06)0.81 (0.64, 1.02)
  Females [a]44,674611HR0.96 (0.85, 1.08)0.91 (0.75, 1.11)
Gastrointestinal [c],‡69,120166HR0.76 (0.61, 0.94)0.80 (0.55, 1.17)
Respiratory Tract [c]69,12054HR0.85 (0.61, 1.30)0.59 (0.28, 1.23)
Urinary Tract [c]69,12080HR1.13 (0.79, 1.61)1.73 (1.05, 2.84)
All-male cancer [d]24,446205HR0.95 (0.66, 1.25)0.81 (0.57, 1.17)
All-female cancer [c]44,674284HR1.04 (0.87, 1.25)0.71 (0.50, 1.01)
All-female cancer includes female breast, vulva, vagina, cervix uteri, corpus uteri, endometrial, uterus, and ovary. Cancer of the gastrointestinal tract includes esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, liver and bile ducts, gallbladder, biliary tract, and pancreas. All-male cancer includes prostate, penis, and testis. Cancer of the respiratory tract and intra-thoracic organs include nasal cavity, middle ear, larynx, trachea, bronchus, lung, heart, mediastinum, and pleura. Cancer of the urinary tract includes renal pelvis, ureter, kidney, and bladder; Non-vegetarian is the referent group. HR = hazard ratio; [a] HR adjusted by race, family history of cancer, BMI, education, smoking, alcohol, age at menarche, pregnancies, breastfeeding, oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy, and menopause status; * p = 0.03; [b] HR adjusted by race, family history of cancer, BMI, education, smoking, and alcohol; [c] Multivariate HR model adjusted by race, family history of cancer, education, smoking, alcohol, age at menarche, pregnancies, breastfeeding, oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy, menopause status, and BMI; ‡ p = 0.001; [d] Multivariate HR model adjusted for age, family history of cancer, education, smoking, alcohol, and BMI.
Table 8 presents results for all-cause and cause-specific mortality comparing lacto-ovo-vegetarian and vegan Adventists to non-vegetarians. Lacto-ovo-vegetarians experienced a 9% risks reduction for all-cause total mortality. Vegan had 14% lower risks of all-cause mortality in males. Lacto-ovo-vegetarian and vegan males experienced a 23% and 42% risks reduction in CVD mortality, respectively. Vegan males also had a 55% risk reduction for ischemic heart disease. Overall, the risks reduction in all-cause and specific-cause mortality were greater in males than females.
Table
Table 8. All-cause and cause-specific mortality among lacto-ovo-vegetarians and vegan Adventists.
Table 8. All-cause and cause-specific mortality among lacto-ovo-vegetarians and vegan Adventists.
Cause-Specific MortalityPerson at-RiskNo. of EventsParameter EstimatesLacto-ovo-VegetarianVeganCohort(s) & References
HR (95% CI)
All-cause mortality [a],[b],‡73,3082560HR0.91 (0.82, 1.00)0.85 (0.73, 1.01)AHS-2 [19]
  Males [a],*25,1051031HR0.86 (0.74, 1.01)0.72 (0.56, 0.92)
  Females [c]48,2031529HR0.94 (0.83, 1.07)0.97 (0.78, 1.20)
All-Cancer [a],[b]73,308706HR0.90 (0.75, 1.09)0.92 (0.68, 1.24)
  Males [a]25,105273HR1.01 (0.75, 1.37)0.81 (0.48, 1.36)
  Females48,203433HR0.85 (0.67, 1.09)0.99 (0.69, 1.44)
Ischemic Heart Disease [a],[b]73,308372HR0.82 (0.62, 1.06)0.90 (0.60, 1.33)
  Males [a],*25,105159HR0.76 (0.52, 1.12)0.45 (0.21, 0.94)
  Females [c]48,203203HR0.85 (0.59, 1.22)1.39 (0.87, 2.24)
Cardiovascular Disease [a], [b]73,308987HR0.90 (0.76, 1.06)0.91 (0.71, 1.16)
  Males [a],*25,105390HR0.77 (0.59, 0.99)0.58 (0.38, 0.89)
  Females [c]48,203597HR0.99 (0.81, 1.22)1.18 (0.88, 1.60)
Other-cause [a],[b],‡73,308867HR0.91 (0.77–1.07)0.74 (0.56–0.99)
  Males [a]25,105368HR0.89 (0.69–1.15)0.81 (0.53–1.22)
  Females [c]48,203499HR0.93 (0.75–1.17)0.70 (0.47–1.05)
Non-vegetarian is the referent group. HR = hazard ratio; [a] Adjusted by age (i.e., attained age as time variable), race, smoking, exercise, personal income, educational level, marital status, alcohol, region, and. Other-cause includes non-CVD and non-cancer; * p < 0.05;[b] Also adjusted by sex, menopause, and hormone therapy; ‡ p < 0.05; [c] Also adjusted by menopause and hormone therapy.

4. Discussion

The published studies of North American Adventists paint a consistent picture across all three study cohorts, associating vegetarian diets with lower body mass index [21,22,29], coronary heart disease [19,30], hypertension [18,21], type 2 diabetes [15,21,23,28], and metabolic syndrome [29]. Similarly, vegetarians have lower risks for colon, gastrointestinal tract, prostate and overall cancer. Among males, vegetarian diets seem to be protective against all-cause mortality and CVD mortality. Results for some diseases such as breast cancer mortality are not always consistent within the earlier Adventist cohorts [26,31,32,33,34]. The lower risk among vegetarians of several high prevalent chronic diseases results in a greater life-expectancy compared to non-vegetarians. Although, Adventist males tend to live 7.3 years and females 4.4 years longer than their gender counterparts in the general Californian population [15,35], within the same cohort, vegetarians had more modest 1.5 to 2.4 years longer life-expectancy than non-vegetarian Adventists [35]. This suggests that other non-dietary factors of the Adventist lifestyles may also contribute to their longevity.
The other major vegetarian cohort is the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Oxford) study where 65,429 participants were recruited from the United Kingdom, many of whom are vegetarians [36]. Similar to Adventist vegetarians, British vegetarians enjoy lower rate of cardiovascular disease and risk factors compared to their non-vegetarians British counterparts [37]. In the EPIC-Oxford cohort study [38,39,40], the total incidence of all cancers was lower among vegetarians than meat eaters; however, colorectal cancer rates were greater than the non-vegetarians [38]. Another study reported no difference in total mortality between British vegetarians compared with other health-conscious participants [41]. A pooled analysis has shown reductions only for IHD mortality [25]. A possible explanation for the discrepancy between British vegetarians and US Adventist vegetarians may be related to differences in diets other than the absence of meat [27]. Vegetarians and vegans from the Adventist cohorts consume more fiber and vitamin C than those of the EPIC-Oxford [29,36]. It has been previously noted that the lack of consistent findings from British vegetarians deserves further attention [27,42], since other non-dietary lifestyle factors may also differ between the two vegetarian cohorts.
Beyond meatless, there is a need to evaluate the health effects of different types of vegetarian diets. How does the health status of lacto-ovo-vegetarians and vegans differ from non-vegetarians? In the Adventist cohorts, both lacto-ovo-vegetarians and vegans have reduced risk for hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and obesity; however, vegans experienced greater risks reduction for those diseases. Similarly, both lacto-ovo-vegetarian males and vegan male have lower mortality from cardiovascular disease compared to non-vegetarians, but risk reduction is greater among vegans. In contrast, both lacto-ovo-vegetarian and vegan females do not seem to have a lower risk of mortality from cardiovascular diseases. Not so clear patterns are observed for cancer outcomes. While lacto-ovo-vegetarians have lower risk of cancer of the gastrointestinal tract, vegans experience a higher risk for cancer of the urinary tract. For other-cancer sites, the risk is slightly but not significantly lower for both lacto-ovo-vegetarians and vegans compared to non-vegetarians. Subsequent reports with longer follow-up time and more cancer cases will help clarify the role of specific vegetarian diets with cancer outcomes.
Several proposed mechanisms may explain the lower risks for some diseases exhibited by vegans compared to lacto-ovo-vegetarians. It is well established that obesity is a major risk factor for CVD [43,44,45,46] and cancer [47,48,49,50,51]. Significantly lower mean BMI observed in vegans may be an important factor for reducing risks from heart disease and CVD mortality [36]. Nutrient profiles of the vegetarian dietary patterns may explain cardiovascular risks reduction [29]. Dietary fibers, folate, antioxidants, and phytochemicals rich in fruits and vegetables [52,53], whole grains, soy, and nuts [54,55,56] are associated with low level of serum cholesterol [57], lower trans/saturated fat, lower incidence of diabetes [58], CVD [59], and specific cancers [60], and lower mortality incidence from stroke and IHD [61]. Other published studies of vegetarians also found that vegans are thinner [62], have lower LDL and total cholesterol [63] than lacto-ovo-vegetarians, among whites and African Americans [64]. Similarly, among Latin Americans, vegans have lower plasma lipids than lacto-ovo-vegetarians and omnivores [65]. Vinagre et al. [66] showed that vegan diets improved metabolic pathways of cholesterol remnant removal from circulation.
Vegans may have a greater challenge in meeting the nutritional adequacy for vitamin B12, protein, and calcium compared to lacto-ovo-vegetarians and meat-eaters. Thus, the potential adverse effects of vegan diets deserve consideration. In the EPIC-Oxford study [67], vegans had 30% higher fracture rates than meat-eaters. However, when adjusted for calcium intake, vegans no longer had higher fracture rate. Other studies found similar results [68]. In a review, Dunham et al. reported higher rates of vitamin B12 deficiency among vegans compared with other vegetarians [69]. Vitamin B12 deficiency may increase CVD risk factors [70], and is associated for a wide range of neurological disorders [71]. In addition, for those following a vegan diet, optimizing intakes of n-3 fatty acids is highly recommended [72,73,74]. Nevertheless, vegans can avoid nutritional inadequacy with appropriate food choices [4,7,72].

Strengths and Limitations

The strength of this review is its focus on only prospective studies of vegetarian Adventists. The Adventist population places high emphasis on health and exhibits diverse dietary habits [14], with relatively low percentage of alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking. Thus, this reduces possible confounding due to non-dietary factors, and results in greater statistical power. In addition, the consistent and refined operational definitions of dietary patterns offer an advantage in measuring the relationship between vegetarian diets and disease/mortality outcomes.
Since this review is limited to the Adventist cohorts, the findings may not be fully generalizable to other vegetarians with different lifestyles. The studies in our review did not directly compare vegans with lacto-ovo-vegetarians, thus it may not provide adequate interpretation of the magnitude of differences in effect size between these two dietary patterns. The observed health benefits of vegetarians may be partially related to other lifestyle factors due to residual confounding. Dietary patterns may change over time, which has not been accounted for in the analysis. These studies, like any others using the food frequency questionnaires, include unavoidable measurement errors in the assessment of food consumptions. However, in the Adventist population, we have reported good validity for the foods used in defining the different types of vegetarian diets [75]. Non-vegetarian Adventists, used as a reference in all reported comparisons, consume much less meat than the general population [35,76]. Thus, the relatively low intake of meat by this reference group in this cohort may result in smaller observed effects. Relative small sample size within the vegan groups may limit our conclusions.
The research on the health effects of vegan diets and chronic diseases have mostly derived from observational studies of Adventist and Oxford vegetarians cohorts. These studies have mainly focused on cardiovascular disease and cancer outcomes. Further research is needed in the prospective investigation of obesity, diabetes, cognition, and other neurological disorders. Given the consistency of results from prospective epidemiological studies on vegetarian diets and cardiovascular disease, large randomized dietary intervention trials on vegan and lacto-ovo-vegetarian patterns are warranted to duplicate the findings and further investigate the health effects of these diets.

5. Conclusions

In summary, vegetarians have consistently shown to have lower risks for cardiometabolic outcomes and some cancers across all three prospective cohorts of Adventists. Beyond meatless diets, further avoidance of eggs and dairy products may offer a mild additional benefit. Compared to lacto-ovo-vegetarian diets, vegan diets seem to provide some added protection against obesity, hypertension, type-2 diabetes; and cardiovascular mortality. In general, the protective effects of vegetarian diets are stronger in men than in women. At present, there are limited prospective data on vegetarian dietary patterns and body weight change, obesity and neurological disorders. Large dietary intervention trials on the effects of vegetarian diets on obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular outcomes are warranted to make meaningful recommendations for nutritional planning, assessment, and counseling.

Acknowledgments

All authors have primary responsibility for the final content and read and approved the final manuscript. The work was funded in part by NIH/NCI grant, NIH R01-CA094594. Special acknowledgement to Gina Siapco for her editorial comments in a previous version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. In U.S., 5% Consider Themselves Vegetarians. Available online: http://www.gallup.com/poll/156215/consider-themselves-vegetarians.aspx (accessed on 15 November 2013).
  2. Krey, S.H. Alternate dietary lifestyles. Primary Care 1982, 9, 595–603. [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlsson-Kanyama, A.; Gonzalez, A.D. Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 1704s–1709s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Craig, W.J.; Mangels, A.R. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Vegetarian diets. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2009, 109, 1266–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fox, N.; Ward, K. Health, ethics and environment: A qualitative study of vegetarian motivations. Appetite 2008, 50, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Anonymous. Position Paper on the vegetarian approach to eating. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1980, 77, 61–69. [Google Scholar]
  7. Havala, S.; Dwyer, J. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Vegetarian diets. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1993, 93, 1317–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sabate, J.; Duk, A.; Lee, C.L. Publication trends of vegetarian nutrition articles in biomedical literature, 1966–1995. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999, 70, 601s–607s. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hardinge, M.G.; Stare, F.J. Nutritional studies of vegetarians. II. Dietary and serum levels of cholesterol. J. Clin. Nutr. 1954, 2, 83–88. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hardinge, M.G.; Stare, F.J. Nutritional studies of vegetarians. I. Nutritional, physical, and laboratory studies. J. Clin. Nutr. 1954, 2, 73–82. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hardinge, M.G.; Crooks, H.; Stare, F.J. Nutritional studies of vegetarians. IV. Dietary fatty acids and serum cholesterol levels. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1962, 10, 516–524. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hardinge, M.G.; Johnston, P.K. Recognition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999, 70, 431s–432s. [Google Scholar]
  13. Binkley, J.; Jensen, G.L. Diet, Life Expectancy, and Chronic Disease: Studies of Seventh-day Adventists and Other Vegetarians, by Gary E Fraser, 2003, 392 pages, hardcover, $59.95. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 525–526. [Google Scholar]
  14. Butler, T.L.; Fraser, G.E.; Beeson, W.L.; Knutsen, S.F.; Herring, R.P.; Chan, J.; Sabate, J.; Montgomery, S.; Haddad, E.; Preston-Martin, S.; et al. Cohort profile: The Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2). Int. J. Epidemiol. 2008, 37, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tonstad, S.; Butler, T.; Yan, R.; Fraser, G.E. Type of vegetarian diet, body weight, and prevalence of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009, 32, 791–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Phillips, R.L.; Kuzma, J.W. Rationale and methods for an epidemiologic study of cancer among Seventh-Day Adventists. Natl. Cancer Instit. Monogr. 1977, 47, 107–112. [Google Scholar]
  17. Beeson, W.L.; Mills, P.K.; Phillips, R.L.; Andress, M.; Fraser, G.E. Chronic disease among Seventh-day Adventists, a low-risk group. Rationale, methodology, and description of the population. Cancer 1989, 64, 570–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pettersen, B.J.; Anousheh, R.; Fan, J.; Jaceldo-Siegl, K.; Fraser, G.E. Vegetarian diets and blood pressure among white subjects: Results from the Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2). Public Health Nutr. 2012, 15, 1909–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Orlich, M.J.; Singh, P.N.; Sabate, J.; Jaceldo-Siegl, K.; Fan, J.; Knutsen, S.; Beeson, W.L.; Fraser, G.E. Vegetarian dietary patterns and mortality in Adventist Health Study 2. JAMA Intern. Med. 2013, 173, 1230–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tantamango-Bartley, Y.; Jaceldo-Siegl, K.; Fan, J.; Fraser, G. Vegetarian diets and the incidence of cancer in a low-risk population. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2013, 22, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fraser, G.E. Associations between diet and cancer, ischemic heart disease, and all-cause mortality in non-Hispanic white California Seventh-day Adventists. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999, 70, 532s–538s. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rizzo, N.S.; Sabate, J.; Jaceldo-Siegl, K.; Fraser, G.E. Vegetarian dietary patterns are associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome: The adventist health study 2. Diabetes Care 2011, 34, 1225–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vang, A.; Singh, P.N.; Lee, J.W.; Haddad, E.H.; Brinegar, C.H. Meats, processed meats, obesity, weight gain and occurrence of diabetes among adults: Findings from Adventist Health Studies. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2008, 52, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Singh, P.N.; Fraser, G.E. Dietary risk factors for colon cancer in a low-risk population. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998, 148, 761–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Key, T.J.; Fraser, G.E.; Thorogood, M.; Appleby, P.N.; Beral, V.; Reeves, G.; Burr, M.L.; Chang-Claude, J.; Frentzel-Beyme, R.; Kuzma, J.W.; et al. Mortality in vegetarians and nonvegetarians: Detailed findings from a collaborative analysis of 5 prospective studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999, 70, 516s–524s. [Google Scholar]
  26. Phillips, R.L.; Lemon, F.R.; Beeson, W.L.; Kuzma, J.W. Coronary heart disease mortality among Seventh-Day Adventists with differing dietary habits: A preliminary report. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1978, 31, S191–s198. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fraser, G.E. Vegetarian diets: What do we know of their effects on common chronic diseases? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 1607s–1612s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tonstad, S.; Stewart, K.; Oda, K.; Batech, M.; Herring, R.P.; Fraser, G.E. Vegetarian diets and incidence of diabetes in the Adventist Health Study-2. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2013, 23, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rizzo, N.S.; Jaceldo-Siegl, K.; Sabate, J.; Fraser, G.E. Nutrient profiles of vegetarian and nonvegetarian dietary patterns. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2013, 113, 1610–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Key, T.J.; Davey, G.K.; Appleby, P.N. Health benefits of a vegetarian diet. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1999, 58, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lemon, F.R.; Walden, R.T.; Woods, R.W. Cancer of the lung and mouth in seventh-day adventists. Preliminary report on a population study. Cancer 1964, 17, 486–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wynder, E.L.; Lemon, F.R. Cancer, coronary artery disease and smoking: A preliminary report on differences in incidence between Seventh-day Adventists and others. Calif. Med. 1958, 89, 267–272. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wynder, E.L.; Lemon, F.R.; Bross, I.J. Cancer and coronary artery disease among Seventh-Day Adventists. Cancer 1959, 12, 1016–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Phillips, R.L. Role of life-style and dietary habits in risk of cancer among seventh-day adventists. Cancer Res. 1975, 35, 3513–3522. [Google Scholar]
  35. Fraser, G.E.; Shavlik, D.J. Ten years of life: Is it a matter of choice? Arch. Intern. Med. 2001, 161, 1645–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Davey, G.K.; Spencer, E.A.; Appleby, P.N.; Allen, N.E.; Knox, K.H.; Key, T.J. EPIC-Oxford: Lifestyle characteristics and nutrient intakes in a cohort of 33,883 meat-eaters and 31,546 non meat-eaters in the UK. Public Health Nutr. 2003, 6, 259–269. [Google Scholar]
  37. Crowe, F.L.; Appleby, P.N.; Travis, R.C.; Key, T.J. Risk of hospitalization or death from ischemic heart disease among British vegetarians and nonvegetarians: Results from the EPIC-Oxford cohort study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 97, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Key, T.J.; Appleby, P.N.; Spencer, E.A.; Travis, R.C.; Roddam, A.W.; Allen, N.E. Cancer incidence in vegetarians: Results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Oxford). Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 1620s–1626s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Appleby, P.N.; Thorogood, M.; Mann, J.I.; Key, T.J. The Oxford Vegetarian Study: An overview. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999, 70, 525s–531s. [Google Scholar]
  40. Vergnaud, A.C.; Norat, T.; Romaguera, D.; Mouw, T.; May, A.M.; Travier, N.; Luan, J.; Wareham, N.; Slimani, N.; Rinaldi, S.; et al. Meat consumption and prospective weight change in participants of the EPIC-PANACEA study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 92, 398–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Key, T.J.; Appleby, P.N.; Davey, G.K.; Allen, N.E.; Spencer, E.A.; Travis, R.C. Mortality in British vegetarians: Review and preliminary results from EPIC-Oxford. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 78, 533s–538s. [Google Scholar]
  42. Key, T.J.; Appleby, P.N.; Spencer, E.A.; Travis, R.C.; Roddam, A.W.; Allen, N.E. Mortality in British vegetarians: Results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Oxford). Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 1613s–1619s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lavie, C.J.; Milani, R.V.; Ventura, H.O. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: Risk factor, paradox, and impact of weight loss. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 53, 1925–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. De Schutter, A.; Lavie, C.J.; Patel, D.A.; Milani, R.V. Obesity paradox and the heart: Which indicator of obesity best describes this complex relationship? Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metabol. Care 2013, 16, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lavie, C.J.; McAuley, P.A.; Church, T.S.; Milani, R.V.; Blair, S.N. Obesity and cardiovascular diseases-implications regarding fitness, fatness and severity in the obesity paradox. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 63, 1345–1354. [Google Scholar]
  46. Alpert, M.A.; Lavie, C.J.; Agrawal, H.; Aggarwal, K.B.; Kumar, S.A. Obesity and heart failure: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Transl. Res. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Reeves, G.K.; Pirie, K.; Beral, V.; Green, J.; Spencer, E.; Bull, D. Cancer incidence and mortality in relation to body mass index in the Million Women Study: Cohort study. BMJ 2007, 335, 1134. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bonn, S.E.; Wiklund, F.; Sjolander, A.; Szulkin, R.; Stattin, P.; Holmberg, E.; Gronberg, H.; Balter, K. Body mass index and weight change in men with prostate cancer: Progression and mortality. Cancer Causes Control 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Revillion, F.; Charlier, M.; Lhotellier, V.; Hornez, L.; Giard, S.; Baranzelli, M.C.; Djiane, J.; Peyrat, J.P. Messenger RNA expression of leptin and leptin receptors and their prognostic value in 322 human primary breast cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 2088–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Soliman, P.T.; Wu, D.; Tortolero-Luna, G.; Schmeler, K.M.; Slomovitz, B.M.; Bray, M.S.; Gershenson, D.M.; Lu, K.H. Association between adiponectin, insulin resistance, and endometrial cancer. Cancer 2006, 106, 2376–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Van Kruijsdijk, R.C.; van der Wall, E.; Visseren, F.L. Obesity and cancer: The role of dysfunctional adipose tissue. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2009, 18, 2569–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Haddad, E.H.; Berk, L.S.; Kettering, J.D.; Hubbard, R.W.; Peters, W.R. Dietary intake and biochemical, hematologic, and immune status of vegans compared with nonvegetarians. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999, 70, 586s–593s. [Google Scholar]
  53. Larsson, C.L.; Johansson, G.K. Young Swedish vegans have different sources of nutrients than young omnivores. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2005, 105, 1438–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sabate, J.; Wien, M. Nuts, blood lipids and cardiovascular disease. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 19, 131–136. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sabate, J.; Oda, K.; Ros, E. Nut consumption and blood lipid levels: A pooled analysis of 25 intervention trials. Arch. Intern. Med. 2010, 170, 821–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ros, E.; Tapsell, L.C.; Sabate, J. Nuts and berries for heart health. Curr. Atheroscl. Rep. 2010, 12, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Djousse, L.; Arnett, D.K.; Coon, H.; Province, M.A.; Moore, L.L.; Ellison, R.C. Fruit and vegetable consumption and LDL cholesterol: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 213–217. [Google Scholar]
  58. Jenkins, D.J.; Kendall, C.W.; Augustin, L.S.; Mitchell, S.; Sahye-Pudaruth, S.; Blanco Mejia, S.; Chiavaroli, L.; Mirrahimi, A.; Ireland, C.; Bashyam, B.; et al. Effect of legumes as part of a low glycemic index diet on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled trial. Arch. Intern. Med. 2012, 172, 1653–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Threapleton, D.E.; Greenwood, D.C.; Evans, C.E.; Cleghorn, C.L.; Nykjaer, C.; Woodhead, C.; Cade, J.E.; Gale, C.P.; Burley, V.J. Dietary fibre intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2013, 347, f6879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fu, Z.; Shrubsole, M.J.; Smalley, W.E.; Ness, R.M.; Zheng, W. Associations between dietary fiber and colorectal polyp risk differ by polyp type and smoking status. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 592–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Boeing, H.; Bechthold, A.; Bub, A.; Ellinger, S.; Haller, D.; Kroke, A.; Leschik-Bonnet, E.; Muller, M.J.; Oberritter, H.; Schulze, M.; et al. Critical review: Vegetables and fruit in the prevention of chronic diseases. Eur. J. Nutr. 2012, 51, 637–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Spencer, E.A.; Appleby, P.N.; Davey, G.K.; Key, T.J. Diet and body mass index in 38000 EPIC-Oxford meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metabol. Disord. 2003, 27, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jenkins, D.J.; Wong, J.M.; Kendall, C.W.; Esfahani, A.; Ng, V.W.; Leong, T.C.; Faulkner, D.A.; Vidgen, E.; Paul, G.; Mukherjea, R. Effect of a 6-month vegan low-carbohydrate (“Eco-Atkins”) diet on cardiovascular risk factors and body weight in hyperlipidaemic adults: A randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2014, 4, e003505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Toohey, M.L.; Harris, M.A.; DeWitt, W.; Foster, G.; Schmidt, W.D.; Melby, C.L. Cardiovascular disease risk factors are lower in African-American vegans compared to lacto-ovo-vegetarians. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 1998, 17, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. De Biase, S.G.; Fernandes, S.F.; Gianini, R.J.; Duarte, J.L. Vegetarian diet and cholesterol and triglycerides levels. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2007, 88, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Vinagre, J.C.; Vinagre, C.G.; Pozzi, F.S.; Slywitch, E.; Maranhao, R.C. Metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and transfer of lipids to high-density lipoproteins (HDL) in vegan and omnivore subjects. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2013, 23, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Appleby, P.; Roddam, A.; Allen, N.; Key, T. Comparative fracture risk in vegetarians and nonvegetarians in EPIC-Oxford. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 61, 1400–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. McLean, R.R.; Jacques, P.F.; Selhub, J.; Fredman, L.; Tucker, K.L.; Samelson, E.J.; Kiel, D.P.; Cupples, L.A.; Hannan, M.T. Plasma B vitamins, homocysteine, and their relation with bone loss and hip fracture in elderly men and women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 93, 2206–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Dunham, L.; Kollar, L.M. Vegetarian eating for children and adolescents. J. Pediatr. Health Care 2006, 20, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. McNulty, H.; Pentieva, K.; Hoey, L.; Ward, M. Homocysteine, B-vitamins and CVD. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2008, 67, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Institute of Medicine Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Iitakes and its Panel on Folate, Other B Vitamins Choline. In Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate, Vitamin B12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline; National Academies Press (US) National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
  72. Craig, W.J. Nutrition concerns and health effects of vegetarian diets. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2010, 25, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rosell, M.S.; Lloyd-Wright, Z.; Appleby, P.N.; Sanders, T.A.; Allen, N.E.; Key, T.J. Long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in plasma in British meat-eating, vegetarian, and vegan men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 82, 327–334. [Google Scholar]
  74. Leitzmann, C. Vegetarian diets: What are the advantages? Forum Nutr. 2005, 57, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jaceldo-Siegl, K.; Fan, J.; Sabate, J.; Knutsen, S.F.; Haddad, E.; Beeson, W.L.; Herring, R.P.; Butler, T.L.; Bennett, H.; Fraser, G.E. Race-specific validation of food intake obtained from a comprehensive FFQ: The Adventist Health Study-2. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 14, 1988–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Singh, P.N.; Sabate, J.; Fraser, G.E. Does low meat consumption increase life expectancy in humans? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 78, 526s–532s. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Le, L.T.; Sabaté, J. Beyond Meatless, the Health Effects of Vegan Diets: Findings from the Adventist Cohorts. Nutrients 2014, 6, 2131-2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6062131

AMA Style

Le LT, Sabaté J. Beyond Meatless, the Health Effects of Vegan Diets: Findings from the Adventist Cohorts. Nutrients. 2014; 6(6):2131-2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6062131

Chicago/Turabian Style

Le, Lap Tai, and Joan Sabaté. 2014. "Beyond Meatless, the Health Effects of Vegan Diets: Findings from the Adventist Cohorts" Nutrients 6, no. 6: 2131-2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6062131

APA Style

Le, L. T., & Sabaté, J. (2014). Beyond Meatless, the Health Effects of Vegan Diets: Findings from the Adventist Cohorts. Nutrients, 6(6), 2131-2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6062131

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop