User reviews

Rather too much good solid Shaw has been lost in screenwriter Anatole de Grunwald's attempt to turn a solid and surprisingly funny play about the moral dilemma faced by a man (John Robinson, bearing a striking resemblance to Maurice Evans) over whether to save the life of a brilliant artist who is also a wastrel or a good man who offers far less to posterity into a La Boheme-tinged love triangle between top billed Leslie Caron, Dirk Bogarde (both fine and passionate, as always) and Robinson.

Fortunately, the screen comes alive when the quartet of Shaw's doctors are on stage debating morality and science, most especially in the persons of old Shauvian hands like Robert Morley (Andrew Undershaft in the 1941 Pascal film of MAJOR BARBARA) and Felix Aylmer (Cauchon in the 1957 Otto Preminger film and 1966 Caedmon recording of SAINT JOAN). Alistair Sim as a surgery-happy practitioner also carries his share of the comic load, with Robinson (the real lead of the film) bringing up the slightly stuffy rear.

Director Anthony Asquith , who helmed the great 1938 film of PYGMALION which won Shaw his Oscar as best screenwriter, never allows the action to drag, brings out the best of Shaw's life lessons ("those who marry happily will marry again") even when Grunwald nearly buries them in stock romantic fumbling and uses the period setting as well as he did in his still definitive 1952 film of Wilde's IMPORTANCE OF BEING EARNEST.

This ...DILEMMA may not be a great film, but given the first rate cast and handsome production, it's well worth discovering - and lovers of Shaw shouldn't think of missing it.

George Bernard Shaw's play, "The Doctor's Dilemma" is adapted here by Anatole de Grunwald and directed by Anthony Asquith. Asquith has a formidable cast: Leslie Caron, Dirk Bogarde, Alistair Sim, Robert Morley, Felix Aylmer, John Robinson, and Michael Gwynn. Caron plays Mrs. Dubedat, whose artist husband Louis (Bogarde) is dying of tuberculosis. She approaches a doctor, Sir Ridgeon (Robinson) who has a cure for TB but can only treat so many patients. He's very attracted to the lovely Mrs. Dubedat and says that he must meet her husband to see if he's worth saving. Meanwhile, he finds out that a friend of his (Gwynn) is suffering from the same disease.

Mrs. Dubedat worships her husband and is blind to his faults, which are many. He hits people up for money that he has no intention of returning, he steals a cigarette case from one of the doctors, and he's a bigamist. The doctors are shocked to learn all of this. On the other hand, he's a great artist. What to do? At the time this play was written, it was somewhat topical, as there was a doctor who thought he had a cure for TB but didn't. Shaw, in his way, pokes holes at the doctors represented here - the surgeon (Morley) who thinks that there's an operation for every condition; the quack (Sim) who blames everything on blood poisoning. A third doctor (Aylmer) is more thoughtful, taking nothing for granted. Shaw was somewhat of a metaphysician, and apparently didn't believe in doctors. He believed that the human system could heal itself.

But though this has its comic moments - Dubedat's completely unapologetic attitude about his bigamy, borrowing, and stealing - it does raise questions about the iconic status some people achieve when they die young, and whether, in fact, they're not better off doing so. And what makes a person worth living? His good deeds or his great art? Bogarde is great as usual as the handsome, womanizing rogue, and he and Caron make a beautiful couple. If Caron was trying to prove she was more than a dancer with this film, she certainly did so, in a sympathetic performance. But for a woman without much money, she sure had some beautiful Cecil Beaton costumes. As the film is in color, they're even more eye-popping. The doctors Sim, Morley, and Robinsonare wonderful.

"The Doctor's Dilemma" is talky, especially in the beginning, but stick with it. It's not the best adaptation of Shaw for the screen that you'll ever see, but the performances make it worth it, and it's a thought-provoking movie.

An interesting but not particularly engaging George Bernard Shaw satirical play is given a serviceable cinematic treatment from director Asquith - who clearly had fared much better with PYGMALION (1938) - but, nonetheless, the film is buoyed by a good cast (Leslie Caron, Dirk Bogarde, Alastair Sim. Robert Morley, Felix Aylmer, Michael Gwynne, Alec McCowen) and production values (cinematographer Robert Krasker, composer Joseph Kosma, costumer Cecil Beaton, production designer Paul Sheriff). As it happens, some performers acquit themselves better than others: Bogarde is fun as an impoverished but Machiavellian painter dying of tuberculosis and Sim and Morley are their usual pompous selves as two renowned "quacks" competing to treat him so to earn favors from his lovely wife (an unfortunately out-of-her-league Caron).

If you want to dislike Dirk Bogarde, watch The Doctor's Dilemma. You could also watch any number of his movies, but perhaps this is the one that started it all. He plays his character so despicably - and while arguable, that was the point of the story, had the role been acted by James Mason, you would have both hated and liked him. The doctor and the audience would have had a dilemma!

In the story, Michael Gwynn is a celebrated doctor who has the resources to cure a certain number of men from tuberculosis (this is a period piece, despite Leslie Caron's strange hairdo). When a beautiful, pleading woman (Leslie) comes to him and begs him to save her husband's life (Dirk), he tells her he doesn't have enough room in his treatment program. How can he, in good conscience, kill one of the men already signed up just to save Dirk's life? Is he really more worthy of living than any of the others? She argues that because he is a talented artist, he is more worthy. When Michael and his associates, Alistair Sim and Robert Morley, spend some time with Dirk to get to know him, there are lots of unpleasant discoveries... I didn't really enjoy this movie. I couldn't stand Dirk, and George Bernard Shaw's script could have used a good edit while translating it from stage to screen. One fun thing, though: if you're wondering why Leslie was always wearing blousy dresses, it's because she was extremely pregnant during filming! In the final few scenes, even her loosest dress and coat couldn't hide her baby bump.

Dr Maurice Evans must choose between treating a good, simple country doctor or a painter and scoundrel whose wife seems appealing. The Dr.'s colleagues are hilarious, and there's a beautiful scene in a greenhouse for which Anthony Asquith and Cecil Beaton should be praised.

It's the turn of the 20th century in England in this film based on George Bernard Shaw's 1906 play of the same title. While I read some of Shaw in literature classes, I didn't read "The Doctor's Dilemma." So, how much different the screenplay may be from the stage play, I can't say. In spite of a tremendous cast of the day and a top director, with all the elaborate trappings by MGM for a brilliant production in color, this film flopped in Britain and the U. S. And the reason seems obvious.

The film is billed as a comedy and drama, and the latter doesn't work with the former in this film. Had Shaw and/or the screen writers stuck to one theme throughout - satire of the medical profession, this could have been a very good and funny movie. Indeed, the doctors provide most of the humor. But there is far too little of it, especially for the likes of Alastair Sim and Robert Morley. Instead, though, the plot gives much time and attention to the roles played by the leads, Dirk Bogarde and Leslie Caron. And, while Bogarde had proved his talent for comedy, the character he plays here, Louis Dubedat, is not at all funny. And, but for the presence of Caron's physical beauty, she adds nothing to the comedy herself. Her role is a piece of the plot that is also exploited for humor - but it's so weak as to be negligible.

One suspects that the film fairly closely follows Shaw's play, with his obvious disdain for conventional morality in the portrayal of the young leading roles. But that's precisely what does this film in. It was a gamble, going for the glamorous leading people at the time, who obviously wouldn't be playing minor roles to the older actors. But in that gamble, MGM missed an opportunity to have a very good smashing comedy and satire about doctors, and the medical profession in England. It just meant focusing much more on that and much less on the social mores.

No one could miss the points by Bogarde's Dubedat - his scorn of the conventional culture and moral standards. But where is the clever dialog there, and where are the funny lines? And how funny is it that he was a bigamist? And that Caron's character didn't seem to care about that? Or that this otherwise talented painter was a thief and cad? It really paints her as quite strange, if not an out and out floozie. Again, this plot tries to deal with two big ticket themes, but does itself in because of that. The result was a very colorful-looking product with much wasted talent, in an errant screenplay that assured it of flopping with the public.

The bottom line for me -- with the likes of Alastair Sim, Robert Morley, and others of this cast in a supposed comedy and satire, is lots of laughs, chuckles and smiles. But for a few lines by the doctors - mostly in the beginning, this film was void of humor. Here are the best of the small number of good lines.

Sir Patrick Cullen, in the opening voice over of himself walking on Harley Street, "Harley Street - the home of the medical profession... Here they all are - the good and the bad. And the surgeons are the worst. They've found out that a man's body is full of bits and scraps of old organs he's no use for. You can cut half a dozen of 'em out directly and he wouldn't be the worse, except for the illness and the guineas it cost him."

Sir Patrick Cullen, voice over when looking at a maid cleaning a doctor's fence sign, "I know him. He used to snip off the ends of uvulas for 50 guineas."

Sir Colenso Ridgeon, "Oh, Dr. Blenkinsop, I can't bear it The most tragic thing in the world is a sick doctor."

Sir Ralph Bloomfield-Bonington, "Oh, I say, you have got your knife into him, haven't you?" Cutler Walpole, "I wish I had. Yes, I'd make a better man of you."

Cutler Walpole, "Oh, I sent you a paper the other day, about a thing I invented - a new saw, for shoulder blades." Sir Patrick Cullen, "Yes, I got it. It's a good saw. Very useful. Handy, useful." Walpole, "Yes, I knew you'd see its points." Sir Patrick, "I remember that saw 65 years ago." Walpole, "What?" Sir Patrick, "It was called a cabinet maker's jimmy, then."

Cutler Walpole, "95% of the human race suffer from chronic blood poisoning and die of it. Simple as A, B, C."

Cutler Walpole, "I was so upset, I, I forgot to take the sponges out." Chuckling, "There I was, stitching her up, and one of the nurses..."

For heaven's sake - sparkling and witty actors interpreting brilliant Shavian dialogue with exquisite timing, exploring with the greatest imaginable finesse a huge ethical issue which is as timely now as it was then ....I have not seen or read the unedited play so I cannot indulge in comparisons, but it would seem to me that this was a very professional and refined adaptation of a very funny and wise work, which should stimulate the viewer to explore not only Shaw's original, but also all his other brilliant and fearless sashays...and for that matter why not Oscar Wilde, George Gissing, the whole exquisite corpus of the British fin de siecle....why not accept such a film as a great gift, an invitation to broaden one's literary horizons and become aware of a wonderful, lost world of refinement that will never come again? Down with the philistines!!

I love this film. Alistair Sim and Robert Morley are marvelous as they advocate the various and absurd treatments they'd used on their patient.

But I'm appalled that this film isn't available for home viewing, especially when you consider how many crummy films have been released on tape or DVD.

Could it be that Shaw's estate has refused to release the distribution rights for home viewing? If so, then someone out there -- perhaps the Criterion Collection -- can convince the copyright holder to relent.

"Dilemma" may not be the best adaptation of a Shaw play (I think top honors go to "Pygmalion"), but it catches the play's flavor. The dialog is sharp and witty, and Dirk Bogarde gives another fine performance as the ailing man.

This would be a fine addition to any collection.

Not much about the film itself - just a few wacky observations . . .

A very astute version of Shaw's classic play - director Anthony Asquith, allows the characters to revel in the pathos that The Doctor spills over each scene.

Although Dirk Bogarde has his comedy smirk on, his performance is utterly commanding.

A nice little quote is *when you're as old as I am it doesn't matter how old a man is when he dies* :) In the latter scenes, the high jinks continue with (poor) old Dirk in shot in the background.

The colouring of the film is quite brutal - but lends a hand to the mystery of the plot - IMHO.

A nifty film for a lazy Sunday afternoon.

It's rare to come upon such clever and witty dialogue and such an admirable rogue. While this film turns the medical profession onto its hat (not a difficult trick) it does it in a delightful way that captivates and entertains. The twists and turns of the various attitudes is a pleasure to behold. Sure, Caron is a crappy actress who is way over her head among these great actors, but her stilted acting does suit her role. In any case, her acting is overshadowed by the brilliant play and the wonderful performances around her. This is a movie that must be listened to. It wasn't until I devoted my entire attention to it that I really began to appreciate it.

I had just seen it for the first time, and was afraid my friend who has...um..certain resources...would forget to--um--make it available to me. But he did, he did.

I found all the acting, including Caron's. more than satisfactory. Morley and Aylmer are especially funny as two of the doctors ("stimulate the phagocites!" "Bah! A blackguard is a blackguard!") Boqarde is at his most delightful and easy as a gifted but COMPLETELY amoral artist. Oddly, his innocent wife knows all about it in a way. He only has two weaknesses, she says: money and women. Jane Austen says love and money are all there is, so I guess...that about covers it.

Yes, the technicolor is a bit brutal...

"Remember the burning bush?"