Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Mars (TV Series 2016–2018) Poster

(2016–2018)

User Reviews

Review this title
317 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Top grade for the science. Failing grade for the forced, moronic drama.
garrett-533 January 2017
I was really looking forward to this series. Like "Red Planet" and "Mission To Mars" but without the fictional hooey. Like "The Martian" but in grander scale, with many scientists doing their thing, not just one. Bah; I was quite wrong.

Apparently, in the year 2033, we've completely run out of scientists, and instead sent a bunch of backstabbing, whiny hipsters to Mars. If they had any formal training in science, they forgot it all. They certainly don't mention anything scientific in their dialogue with each other. They do not even appear to be doing any scientific work once they arrive - just bickering over their mission, and passive-aggressively hiding useful information from each other, causing bonehead accidents.

What can you do, when you see great frontiers being explored, and cool hardware brought to bear, and you want to smile and enjoy it ... but the people doing it are always upset, depressed, or appallingly unobservant?

Three episodes in, and I quit, because I realized I was actually _dreading_ the next episode, not anticipating it. I was just waiting for them to have their next unnecessary argument or make their next totally avoidable mistake.

How could man's next great frontier be so ... joyless??
239 out of 320 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Science Future
drjgardner15 November 2016
The new mini-series MARS is not like most science fiction films or TV entries. Instead it is more like "science future" rather than science fiction – an extension of existing knowledge and techniques to the near future. More specifically, the authors envision what it would be like to travel to Mars in 2033. Because it is "science future" and not science fiction, most of what we're watching seems familiar.

Each episode looks like a documentary made in 2033 about the pioneers of the Mars movement. So we see interviews of people like Elon Musk and they talk about the Space X program. Then it switches to real time and we see the trials and tribulations of the first people to land on Mars.

As clever as the science future element is, there is a fictional story here as well, concerned with troubles that happen on the approach to Mars and the landing and the subsequent attempt to colonize the planet. This part of the series is lacking, not merely in character development, but also in action. It is slow going, but probably not unlike what it would be if you were there.

Among the most interesting elements are the decisions that have to be made about the program and comparisons between this future project and major exploratory projects of the past.

This series is definitely worth watching.
114 out of 169 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mars watch it for the education or the story
jrneptune23 November 2016
I like the comment where someone said this isn't science fiction but science future. It does take relevant clips and interviews from the past and present which provide educational information and sometimes opinions.

Will we go to Mars? Hell yes. Do we need to? No. Should we? Hell yes. Think how much the world benefited by the challenge we faced by going to the moon and how much technology was developed from doing so.

Going to Mars is just a first step and there is so much to learn from taking on the challenge. We may very well learn to solve some of the present or future problems that we will be facing here on earth by looking for solutions to living on Mars.

Now my comments on the story side of the show.

I am a fan of Elon Musk but why do I get the feeling like this is a one big commercial for the SpaceX program? I have to agree with some comments in that the story line is weak in that much of the planning and contingency planning that would normally be done is not represented in the show. So far with two episodes I have given up on questioning why things are happening as they do and just accept it at face value for the entertainment aspect.

The budget for the show may be limited but National Geographic is providing some great links for the show as well from http://natgeotv.com/mars which includes cast information and interviews, recaps, online viewing, and the Before Mars episode to get folks engaged with the actors.
85 out of 128 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Totally loved Mars episode 1 - VISIONARY & INSPIRING
coralie-3975414 November 2016
WOW WOW WOW, watched the first episode of "Mars" and totally loved it. It's mind blowing to even start to think that in my lifetime (I am 36), I could be witnessing something as HUGE as the first mission to the Red Planet. I mean : WOW ! I totally disagree with the previous comment. The mix of fiction and documentary works really well. Sure this is not your average Netflix series, but hey it's Nat Geo, so it had to have a strong documentary foothold. No ? It gives credibility to the whole thing. I am now going to follow carefully Space X. What they are doing is just incredibly visionary. Can't wait for episode 2. Strongly recommend.
112 out of 201 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Relevant & Retro ... Both at the Same Time
CameronMacKenzie15 November 2016
Was interested to see what Grazer & Howard helped create with this very noble, albeit relatively inexpensive mini-series narrative docudrama, perhaps, created to encourage a renewed interest in what used to be a very successful, highly-supported and admired, if not revered, space program made popular by NASA.

Certainly, the American public is not so adrenaline-addicted that it isn't capable of appreciating a normally- or slow-paced televised program such as MARS or RECTIFY. Episode 1 of any new series, mini- or otherwise, always has the challenge of putting enough story out there in an interesting, if not new, fashion, in order to attract a broad audience to tuning in to view an Episode 2.

I, personally, am not so spoiled that the presence of A-List Actors, overactive CGI or overly-creative sets-props-camera work (a la Abrams' new STAR TREK franchise) are necessary to keep me interested in a good story. After all, an actor's entire reason-to-be is simply to tell "a story".

I enjoyed the time-travel roller-coaster, as well as the real-fiction mash-up. That change-up was as interesting as the space fiction was evenly-paced. Diversity is important in all sorts of venues and mediums; most certainly in our electronic and digital viewing options.

A change-of-pace from 2016-styled television, where mystery and supernatural now run amok, denying viewers good, simple stories about boring and real Reality and Science.

Thanks National Geographic!
71 out of 124 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
You should watch it indeed. Educative? Yes. Thrilling? May be not good enough ! Yet !
SaDa_KaLo22 November 2016
This new series has definitely caught the attention of millions of people, I believe. As a National Geographic Series, it's obvious that the series is scientifically accurate. And the adventure part is really intriguing. Everyone will enjoy these parts. The Mars environment, the astronauts looks really awesome. I would give it 8.0 based on that.

Wait, there's more to it. The series has the decades-long history behind Mars Exploration. Who, where, how, why - all things are there. The documentary lovers like me will definitely appreciate this part for sure.

Overall, I would suggest everyone to try the show. It really does showed the struggles of the astronauts/ relevant people in these explorations.

Thanks to National Geographic.

However, I think sometimes, they are showing too much history. Most of the times, it's okay. But, I do not really understand why you have to go into history, when a dramatic "tension" moment is building up. It really change the mode of the audience. After all, it's a adventure/sci-fi drama, right? not a history documentary?

All in all, although I loved the history part here, my overall rating would not go beyond 7.0, for bad timing of the history parts.

Good luck :)
49 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Absolutely loved it!
wildernessfamily-3792214 February 2019
One of the best TV series I have seen. Couldn't stop watching it! Only bad part is having to wait till Spring 2018 for the season 2.
17 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Amazing and inspiring
Toni250316 November 2016
So don't go into this show expecting a Hollywood-style drama series.

The focus here are not character development or some plot twists, it's about something humanity has dreamed forever and bringing this in a realistic and at the same time entertaining way to the screen.

The documentation parts also really fit the fictional mission and are mostly on point and not too long. Many emotional goosebump-moments, at least for me.

Don't watch it if you don't care about space or deep questions and are only looking for easy entertainment, for everyone else this show is a 10/10
81 out of 130 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Writers and the DNC
richmo-8876829 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I started watching this series with an early tinge of excitement ( because of the subject matter) and also a bit of trepidation because of the diversity of the cast and soon saw the only white male being killed off early in the second episode much like Hillary's crew of Wasserman Schultz, Elizabeth Warren, and Donna Brasille surreptitiously killed of the only white male survivor in the Demo primary. Obviously these writers ( women I believe) set out to construct a form of reality that is truly questionable and with an emphasis to promote and enable female heroes. So and if that story line is the most important factor ( ignoring the actual history of space exploration )then I am done with this poorly scripted and erroneously depicted series. With all the special effects available the producers chose to ignore them and allow the banality. Boo hoo
32 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
People need to face the truth
andreaswae27 November 2019
I think it was a very good series, albeit a little slow. As for the "preachyness", if you're going to make a realistic series about Mars colonisation, climate change and corporate greed are topics that are unavoidable. Climate change is not "left wing", it's just a fact. In fact, far too many movies and TV shows tip-toe around the issue, so it's refreshing someone actually having the balls to address the issue. And the politicised science usually are the one trying to disprove man-made climate change, not the other way around. The only thing that bugged me about the show, was the use of lights inside the helmets, which would impair their vision because of all the reflection. But it seems the norm for most Hollywood movies, so I guess it's forgivable. But all in all a good watch, unless you're too sensitive about the reality of climate change.
25 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Season 1 Good, Season 2 Overly Preachy
Vrian Sinth25 March 2019
I have enjoyed this hypothetical drama of the exploration of Mars. Season one was very enjoyable. At the time I gave it an 8 out of 10. I was very excited for season two, only to find that the amount of preachiness was significantly amped up. I can't get past the preachy aspect of season two, so I have dropped my review down to a 6 out of 10. Hopefully season 3 goes back to the glory of season 1.
44 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Drama is excellent, science too
afortiorama6 December 2019
I really like the drama. Also the documentary part exploring all the sociological implications as well as the technology and the science needed to create settlements on Mars.
16 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not too bad -
ewaf5814 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Yes getting to Mars will be tough. My 1970 Peter Fairley's Space album says we'll be there by 1985 - we'll looks like we've missed that window.

Production wise it obviously suffers from a smallish budget - the monitors in ground control just look like standard home television sets mounted together while for some reason cameras - both for TV and journalists - have bucked current trends and got bigger.

So far - unless there's going to be flashbacks - none of the long journey to Mars was shown except the landing (interior shots only).

Interesting drama has been added as the - rather big - spaceship has landed over 70 kilometres from its intended target - a preconstructed base.

I will be following the series because even if the sections set in 2033 prove not to work that well then there's always the real interviews with scientists - authors and entrepreneurs from the present day giving their views. At the very least it's holding my interest because if we don't get there by the 2030's I might not be around to see the momentous landing.

I hope we do make it.
52 out of 85 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Good idea, bad execution.
badoli9 December 2017
Oh dear, where do i start? While i was really excited for the premise of a mars colony series, this isn't what i was hoping for.

At first the documentary-style segments give it an authentic feel. Yet after a while it really interferes with the pacing of the story. Whenever the situation gets dramatic, there is a cut to Elon Musk or Neil Degrasse Tyson blue-balling us with another scientific explanation. They should have stopped this after the first episode, as it really comes across as filler after that.

What i also couldn't take was the huge character discrepancy between the real life astronaut and his fictional counterparts. While Scott Kelly is a warm and controlled guy, who takes the one-year- separation from his family in a laid-back "it's my job"-attitude, the protagonists of the series seem to get emotional at the slightest mishaps. Add to that the fact they act more like teenagers than professionals with decades of experience.

And finally this seems like the worst space voyage in human history. A blind and hesitant ground control, hardly any reserves, moronic hiring philosophy... If any real mars trip would be happening like this, they would fire the management and drop the whole project.
160 out of 214 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Documentary or Drama series? Who Cares?
lennybuttz13 November 2016
I thought this was horrible. I love The National Geographic Channel, they have some amazing programs. This is not one of them. To be fair, I have only seen the premier episode but from slugging through that I am not 1 bit interested in watching another episode.

They tried a new concept of mixing present day education of space travels past, present and possible with a fictional drama of an actual mission to Mars. The show bounces back and forth from documentary or classroom to fiction moving from past present to future, it's very disjointed. I think I would quite enjoy the documentary part on it's own. I would not enjoy the fictional drama on it's own because it's just plain bad. If you want to see a fictional mission to Mars there are several good Hollywood movies that cover this subject and they do a much better job, watch one of those instead.

The dramatic part of the show is incredibly slow moving, things move along so slowly I had trouble keeping my eyes open, it made me want to take a nap. The filming of the dramatic section was weird, the camera was too close to the actors, I suppose the director thought that would impart a feeling of claustrophobia and cramped spaces, I could have gotten the same idea if the camera had been pulled back. Being so close to everything kind of creates a dizzying effect and made me even more uncomfortable watching.

I was so excited to see this series so when I actually saw it and how bad it was it was extra disappointed. I felt like the Drama part was very unrealistic, it seemed like they got a lot of things wrong, I never felt like the actors were actually on Mars, it looked and felt like they were in a desert in Arizona or some such place.
62 out of 145 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Emotional & Joyfulness
Alienmoon5 January 2019
With the Emotion and Sad surprises within this episode, brifly felt my spirit soar around Mars it-self, for a Few Instances and felt myself smashing into the Martian Dust.

If you love this type of Documovie, then go make a Brew, Sit back, Relax and Bing eatch the Two Seasons. It's a little slow after the first episode, though it does reel you in.

I came across a comment, someone whom I have to believe typed before thinking, Has they said,..." Would be better without all the Political BS" ?

To the comenter, Sadly, We Humans are still at a point where Bureaucrats and Political BS goven ever part of,... Not just your life, but everylife you've known.

They will go on to do so as long as we don't Evolve our Hearts and Minds, in otherwords, Sir.

We are all still children and will go on as such,... Until we put aisde our DDifferances and Start to work together as one.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Different. Awesome.
dpoland-7658917 December 2018
Never mind the "reviews" insinuating politicization. It is a show that basically shows how, if colonization was feasible (which is the premise not a promise), Earth issues and conflicts of profit, law, regulation, politics etc will follow us there.

A great mix of science (and I actually have a PhD in the natural sciences) and story that unlocks the imagination and forces thought on how we lack perspective on our own current planet.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mixed Feelings
kmhammer-6647921 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Watched through Season 2, Episode 3:

There is a lot to like about the production values and overall story in this series, but it suffers from several really bad scientific gaffs. The worst of these is in the episode where an exterior door is opened by a delusional member of the crew resulting in the violent venting the atmosphere out of one wing of the colony habitat, destroying the wing and killing several people. Even if such an idiotic design existed (there was no airlock), the pressure inside the wing would have made it impossible for the door to be opened by a simple lever. Other gaffs include the ultimately fatal injury of a crew member who, after months in zero G tries to climb up into the spaceships control room against a 5 G force when the only sane thing to do would have been to go to the lower end of the ship and ride out the landing. The individual falls, suffers a ruptured spleen and cardiac tamponade yet manages to walk nearly 50 miles in this state. Both are medical emergencies requiring immediate surgery. Another individual dies in transit to Mars due to a meningioma (a non-cancerous tumor that even today can be easily treated and rarely leads to death). Lastly, a pipeline is built on the planets surface to transfer water from one colony to another over a great distance. As the surface temperature of Mars drops way below the freezing point of water at night, the pipeline would be destroyed on the first night by expansion of the water as it turned to ice.

Apart from that, there is a fair amount of PC spread throughout both the fictional and documentary elements of the program. The fictional part portrays one group, run by a corporation, much like the military is portrayed in many anti-war pictures. The documentary portion is actually more even handed.

Follow up on completing season 2:

Sorry to say that the last three episodes of season 2 jumped the science shark on two major points. First, in episode 4, "Contagion," the lack of a proper biohazard containment system when dealing with unknown organisms is laughable. Further, the rapidity in which the organism infects and kills is off the charts (it makes an ebola infection seem like slow motion). The rapidity in which an antibiotic cures those infected, despite severe lung damage, is highly improbable. In the final episode, the sudden loss of power to the mining colony leads to an absurdly rapid loss of breathable oxygen. Contrast this with the first season where the scientific colony lasts for months with inadequate power due to a protracted dust storm. Lastly, something I did not mention earlier: the biggest issue facing the scientific colony in the first season was needing to get underground to avoid radiation exposure. This issue nearly resulted in failure of the colony. Meanwhile, the commercial colony is situated entirely above ground. Very inconsistent to say the least.

The PC goes over the top in these last three episodes. The "Earth" portion of the program becomes an almost continuous attack on industry and mankind in general. Scientists are all altruistic (never mind that many of them work in industry - the dark side must have taken them over). The fictional portion also makes the corporation out to be revolting, but is not as extreme. And some of the scientific colony members do recognize there culpability regarding spread of the contagion.

Consider these caveats as to whether you want to spend time on this series when you are looking for some down time The overall production values and SFX are good, much of the science is accurate but there are some rather frustrating issues you will need to overlook.
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Entertaining And Educational Story Of Exploration
atlasmb23 November 2016
"Mars" is an interesting blend of drama and documentary, featuring commentary by many who currently work on the SpaceX project. A cynic might write the whole series off as a commercial for Elon Musk, but it's a compelling story. In fact, linking the fiction to fundamental facts about human existence and possible extinction gave me a feeling of dread.

That is not to say that all viewers will feel the same way. Some will probably feel exhilaration about the adventure to Mars. But the entire project is explained as necessary to eventual human survival.

In the first two episodes, the voyagers are exposed to the hazards and exertions of take-off, space travel (209 days) and landing. They encounter exigencies and failures. The acting is fine, but I haven't felt that much was demanded of them so far. Especially since they wear helmets much of the time.

"The Martian" was an enjoyable drama about the journey to Mars and its colonization. "Mars" is a similar story, but it's augmented by the technical comments of scientists, Musk, and his team. Anyone who wants to understand the real-world considerations of planning such a mission will probably appreciate these interjections. Others may find them distracting.

The show raises a good question: Is there a sort of "Peter Principle" of Exploration at work, where man will always try to explore one step beyond what he is capable of?
10 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Started strong but getting weaker
jeff-cossey20 November 2018
I loved the premise of the show in season 1 but now it seems to be a pulpit for activist. The story is getting more political and left-wing fringed then it is enjoying.
58 out of 103 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Perhaps
gnile28 November 2018
It has some entertaining points and some feel good points but you have to get through a hell of a lot of liberal/message bs and you are not going to see any American flags. You anti-American liberals will absolutely love it.
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great idea, but why add the implausible dramatic events
serendigity25 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I enjoyed Mars, mainly because I like space exploration and the tech involved. The mixing of documentary footage, interviews of real people and then hopping forward in time to the fictional mission worked quite well. What I didn't like were the implausible series of disasters besetting the crew.

During the Apollo era every activity to be undertaken either in the spacecraft or on the surface in EVA suits was meticulously planned and rehearsed hundreds of times. How likely would it be for a situation to arise on Mars where they would bungle sorting out their power supply, and have that happen right when the worst dust storm in history occurs... Like they would not have seen the weather system developing in time to bring forward the power cable work, or have extra people out there for such a mission critical EVA?

And the lack of dual airlocks in the plant laboratory for dramatic license when the plant guy goes bananas... Not to mention that no one noticed he was that far over the edge until too late.

A real shame they did not focus on the science on Mars and the real issues, rather than trying to make it into a TV movie.
17 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Hands down ... flat out awesome!
BillAMurray31 December 2016
I cannot believe how well done this mini-series was. I desperately hope there will be more episodes; a continuation of the series; or whatever it ends up as. I would love to see this go on until we actually get there. The work that goes into this must have been monumental. Also, the "2016" documentary parts with Robert Zubrin (and others like Elon Musk, etc) adds a great deal of credibility to this work. I cannot help but feel the wonder and amazement the astronauts will feel when we first go and this series is just like looking into the future. So, if you want an early glimpse on what it will be like going to Mars (from both the astronauts as well as those of us left on earth) - you will get your fix here! And, I really think one day history will look back and call this momentum we all have towards going to mars, the "Zubrin Effect". Watch it - you will love it!
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting Series; One-Sided Science
jfbuckley-7258812 December 2019
The series itself is interesting, but the scientific interludes are very one sided and biased. A bit of moderation would have made this a much better series overall.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A lot of good science but also a a lot of bad.
dp197428 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I gave up on the first season because of a lot of science and the "we are humans therefore we must do very stupid things" attitude.

This continued in the second season.

First off there was the blatant disregard for human life when Lukrum arrives and debris from their landing capsule almost kills two people in suits on the surface as well as taking out an installation.

Their scientific excuse: They could not know where it would land. Wrong: they know exactly in what area it would land. Maybe not down to the last meters but they will know the area the debris will impact. We can do this for planes that breakup in the air on earth and make a predictable area of where to search for debris.

Second off. The CME. Solar storms do not travel with the speed of light. There are hours of warning before the storm arrives in case of a carrington event. On Earth. That warning time is about 24 hours and is essential to put satellites and more into safe mode so that they do not get damaged even in small solar storms.

Third. The fact that they cannot navigate the Martian landscape without GPS (supposedly knocked out by CME) is unbelievable. Astronauts on Mars would have made sure to have a backup plan. Navigating by the stars seem to be an easy one for a computer.

4th. The rover just have to little power and to little air for a vehicle of its size. I event think the astronaut only brought 1 tank of oxygen for her suit but i cannot remember that clearly now.

5th. If a persons body temprature is 29 degrees: They would be passed out in deep coma.Here from wikipedia that seems to be credible

31 °C (87.8 °F) - Comatose, very rarely conscious. No or slight reflexes. Very shallow breathing and slow heart rate. Possibility of serious heart rhythm problems. 28 °C (82.4 °F) - Severe heart rhythm disturbances are likely and breathing may stop at any time. Patient may appear to be dead.

Instead she is breathing heavily and talking and very conscious about Lukrum not f... up her samples. all that at 29 degrees body temperature.

I gave up again.

It is some pretty basic stuff they dont display correct.
59 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed