ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,8/10
1,6 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA Princess is determined to restore her homeland's throne to its rightful heir, a young Prince with whom she falls in love.A Princess is determined to restore her homeland's throne to its rightful heir, a young Prince with whom she falls in love.A Princess is determined to restore her homeland's throne to its rightful heir, a young Prince with whom she falls in love.
- Prix
- 4 nominations au total
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- Citations
The Princess: I'm losing track of my own plot. I'm suppose to be eloping with two different fiancees and having two secret marriages.
- ConnexionsReferences Frankenstein (1931)
- Bandes originalesOverture from the Opera DON GIOVANNI
By Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (as W.A.Mozart)
Orchestra: The City of Prague Philharmonic Orchestra (as The City of Prague Philharmonic)
Conducted by Jason Osborn
Commentaire en vedette
This is a very light period piece, in the spirit of plays like a midsummer night's dream, based on a 17th century farce.
Don't expect the type of comedy that will make you laugh out loud, it's more the atmosphere of things not to be taken too seriously, particularly the princess having to pass as a young man. In the spirit of the movie and of older plays it's all perfectly normal and acceptable, because these kind of stories sacrifice believability in favor of good fun. And though flawed, the film is much better than the hugely overrated Shakespeare in Love.
What I did have a problem with, was the horrible jump-cut editing. In a lot of scenes there were useless, unnecessary cuts because the camera did not even switch views, it looked extremely unnatural. Did someone spill coffee on some of the tape so they had to leave some out? Now the acting is what saves the film, I was especially delighted with Mira Sorvino and Ben Kingsley who both skillfully display grotesque but pleasant, sympathetic personalities. It was fun to see Mira in a men's outfit with boyish mannerisms tho still maintaining a feminine look. Also, the backdrops (of the 18th century-design garden and house) are gorgeous, real eyecandy.
I bought this film for quite some money because I was very curious about it and have become fan of Sorvino. I would have rented it, would it have been available, but had to find it somewhere on amazon. But even though it wasn't entirely worth the money, I had a reasonably good time. If you want to see Mira's best, go watch Wisegirls, but this one is worth a watch as well! Enjoy.
I give it 7 out of 10
Don't expect the type of comedy that will make you laugh out loud, it's more the atmosphere of things not to be taken too seriously, particularly the princess having to pass as a young man. In the spirit of the movie and of older plays it's all perfectly normal and acceptable, because these kind of stories sacrifice believability in favor of good fun. And though flawed, the film is much better than the hugely overrated Shakespeare in Love.
What I did have a problem with, was the horrible jump-cut editing. In a lot of scenes there were useless, unnecessary cuts because the camera did not even switch views, it looked extremely unnatural. Did someone spill coffee on some of the tape so they had to leave some out? Now the acting is what saves the film, I was especially delighted with Mira Sorvino and Ben Kingsley who both skillfully display grotesque but pleasant, sympathetic personalities. It was fun to see Mira in a men's outfit with boyish mannerisms tho still maintaining a feminine look. Also, the backdrops (of the 18th century-design garden and house) are gorgeous, real eyecandy.
I bought this film for quite some money because I was very curious about it and have become fan of Sorvino. I would have rented it, would it have been available, but had to find it somewhere on amazon. But even though it wasn't entirely worth the money, I had a reasonably good time. If you want to see Mira's best, go watch Wisegirls, but this one is worth a watch as well! Enjoy.
I give it 7 out of 10
- FlorisV
- 3 févr. 2004
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Triumph of Love?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Bir çılgın âşık
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 5 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 447 267 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 60 507 $ US
- 21 avr. 2002
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 501 442 $ US
- Durée1 heure 52 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was The Triumph of Love (2001) officially released in India in English?
Répondre