Un Fausto moderno

Título original: Bedazzled

1967
Approved
1h 43min

CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb

6.7/10

10 k

TU CALIFICACIÓN

Raquel Welch and Dudley Moore in Un Fausto moderno (1967)

Reproducir trailer2:49

1 video

63 fotos

Dark Comedy Supernatural Fantasy Comedy Fantasy Romance

Un desventurado perdedor vende su alma al diablo a cambio de siete deseos, pero tiene problemas para conquistar a la chica de sus sueños.Un desventurado perdedor vende su alma al diablo a cambio de siete deseos, pero tiene problemas para conquistar a la chica de sus sueños.Un desventurado perdedor vende su alma al diablo a cambio de siete deseos, pero tiene problemas para conquistar a la chica de sus sueños.

Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro

CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb

6.7/10

10 k

TU CALIFICACIÓN

Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro

Videos1

Trailer 2:49

Trailer

Fotos63

+ 56

Más como esto

Argumento

Editar

¿Sabías que…?

Editar

Trivia
Although Raquel Welch is featured in most of the promotional material for this movie, she is on-screen for only roughly seven minutes.

Errores
(at around 55 mins) During Dudley Moore's song "Love Me", which he sings in character as Stanley Moon, the woman to the right of the screen seems to say repeatedly "Oh, Dudley" instead of calling him by his character's name, "Stanley".

Citas
George Spiggott: Everything I've ever told you has been a lie. Including that.
Stanley Moon: Including what?
George Spiggott: That everything I've ever told has been a lie. That's not true.
Stanley Moon: I don't know WHAT to believe.
George Spiggott: Not me, Stanley, believe me!

Conexiones
Featured in Film Review: Peter Cook, Dudley Moore & Stanley Donen (1967)

Bandas sonoras
Main Title
(uncredited)
Composed by Dudley Moore
Performed by The Dudley Moore Trio

Opiniones de usuarios109

Opinión

Opinión destacada

Why are people so very, very stupid?

Not even going to discuss the movie at length - it's brilliantly funny; see it. I'll admit I DID have an additional comment or two to make, but then I read these IMDb reviews and sank into depression.

Do the people who "critique" 30, 40, 50-year-old movies by pointing out that "duhh, it's DATED!" imagine they're applying some kind of rigorous critical standard? Why not simply save valuable time, and pixels, by submitting a "review" stating, "This film cannot overcome the handicap of not taking place in 2003. Where are the SUVs? Where are the cell phones? And why wasn't it shot on the street where I live?"

And I'm fairly sure the guy who complained of the "snotty English accents" that ruined his BEDAZZLED viewing experience is the same fellow who lives in the White House and coined "strategery".