PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
4,7/10
4,6 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
El intrépido pistolero Lucky Luke recibe la orden del presidente de llevar la paz a Daisy Town.El intrépido pistolero Lucky Luke recibe la orden del presidente de llevar la paz a Daisy Town.El intrépido pistolero Lucky Luke recibe la orden del presidente de llevar la paz a Daisy Town.
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesJohn Wayne is credited in the end credits of this movie for not being in this movie.
- PifiasThe credit for "Saloon Girls" is misspelled as "Saloon Gilrs".
- Citas
[Luke has a smoke, but sees the fourth wall he throws away the cigarette]
Lucky Luke: Hi! My name is Lucky Luke! I quit smoking in 1983. I feel much better now.
- Créditos adicionalesThere is a scene in the closing credits: Lucky Luke smokes a cigarette, but upon being noticed he gets rid of it. In a parody of an anti-smoking commercial, Luke says he quit smoking in 1983 and feels better for it.
- ConexionesFollows Los Dalton contra Lucky Luke (2004)
- Banda sonoraRadio Saloon
Performed by Dider Buthiau
Reseña destacada
I'm a Lucky Luke fan, I live in Bulgaria and I've seen and read as much as I could get my hands on here. I adore the cartoons, they are entertaining and stick to the style of the comics. I like the Terence Hill TV series - even that they really look quite different from the comic book character designs, they are entertaining in their own way, and watching Terence Hill is always a delight.
When I got to know that a new Lucky Luke film is in the making I got very excited, and when I saw the trailers I thought it looks great and it's going to be lots of fun and a comic book brought to life.
Well, that was partially true. This film is really great from a visual point of view - camera-work, costumes, sets, makeup... The production design stays as close to the comics as possible. There's an apparent care for detail and the film is an eye candy for sure. It's done on a budget, and it looks great on screen.
But the script... That's where the problem is, and that's what ruins the whole experience. I was excited when I got to know that so many characters will appear in the movie - except for Lucky Luke and Jolie Jumper we have also Pat Poker, Jessie James, Billy The Kid, Calamity Jane... But there is no coherent storyline or straight storytelling. The film is constantly swinging between the goofy comedy, the spaghetti western parody and the personal drama of Luke, presented as an orphan who witnessed the murder of his parents as a kid. There are some obscure scenes which seem to me like just randomly thrown around the script. The film couldn't make me involved, I didn't really care what's happening on screen, and after like 50 minutes I found myself bored and almost forcing myself to see the rest. Nevertheless, there were a couple of funny and cool scenes here and there, I especially love the sequence where Lucky Luke appears for the first time in the beginning of the film.
I feel cheated, because it could have been really an amazing movie, with such a great look, if only they paid more attention to the story itself.
When I got to know that a new Lucky Luke film is in the making I got very excited, and when I saw the trailers I thought it looks great and it's going to be lots of fun and a comic book brought to life.
Well, that was partially true. This film is really great from a visual point of view - camera-work, costumes, sets, makeup... The production design stays as close to the comics as possible. There's an apparent care for detail and the film is an eye candy for sure. It's done on a budget, and it looks great on screen.
But the script... That's where the problem is, and that's what ruins the whole experience. I was excited when I got to know that so many characters will appear in the movie - except for Lucky Luke and Jolie Jumper we have also Pat Poker, Jessie James, Billy The Kid, Calamity Jane... But there is no coherent storyline or straight storytelling. The film is constantly swinging between the goofy comedy, the spaghetti western parody and the personal drama of Luke, presented as an orphan who witnessed the murder of his parents as a kid. There are some obscure scenes which seem to me like just randomly thrown around the script. The film couldn't make me involved, I didn't really care what's happening on screen, and after like 50 minutes I found myself bored and almost forcing myself to see the rest. Nevertheless, there were a couple of funny and cool scenes here and there, I especially love the sequence where Lucky Luke appears for the first time in the beginning of the film.
I feel cheated, because it could have been really an amazing movie, with such a great look, if only they paid more attention to the story itself.
- beastwarsfan
- 12 mar 2010
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Lucky Luke?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Thần Súng Lucky Luke
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 27.000.000 € (estimación)
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 17.854.472 US$
- Duración1 hora 43 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Lucky Luke (2009) officially released in India in English?
Responde