IMDb-BEWERTUNG
7,6/10
5514
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Drei verschiedene Geschichten über ein und dieselbe Sache: le plaisir (das Vergnügen).Drei verschiedene Geschichten über ein und dieselbe Sache: le plaisir (das Vergnügen).Drei verschiedene Geschichten über ein und dieselbe Sache: le plaisir (das Vergnügen).
- Für 1 Oscar nominiert
- 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Mila Parély
- Madame Raphaële (segment "La Maison Tellier")
- (as Mila Parely)
Daniel Gélin
- Jean, le peintre (segment "Le Modèle")
- (as Daniel Gelin)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesStanley Kubrick's favorite movie (as of 1957).
- PatzerAs the children parade in during the first communion sequence, half of an actor's mustache falls off. He sticks it back on as the camera pans him out of frame.
- Zitate
Jean's friend: [Last lines] He found love, glory and fortune.
Friend of Jean's friend: Still, it's very sad.
Jean's friend: But, my friend, there's no joy in happiness.
- Alternative VersionenAn American release switches the last two stories, and ends with "La Maison Tellier" instead of "Le Modèle".
- VerbindungenFeatured in De l'origine du XXIe siècle (2000)
Ausgewählte Rezension
It has been rightly claimed that, between 1945 and 1955, Max Ophuls was the greatest director in the world, crafting a string of dense pearls unmatched before or since. Even 'Le Plaisir', supposedly a minor film in his canon would be a staggering masterpiece in anyone else's.
A triptych of Guy de Maupassant stories, it is also about a trio of Gods. The first two are shown to be limited: Maupassant, author, creator, narrator, speaks to us from the darkness, disembodied, all pervasive ('I could be sitting next to you'), responsible for everything we see - in the last story he crashes down to earth, and is responsible for a suicide attempt; and Ophuls' camera, seemingly weightless, able to navigate space with a freedom unavailable to humans - even it is barred from Madame Tellier's Establishment, forced to peek in from outside. It can reveal the bleak reality behind the prostitutes' gaiety, but is has no access, like the men who exploit them, to their souls.
Or does it? The stunning epiphany at the church, is, after all, on one level just a trick of the camera, or a mere figment of the women's imagination. As we would expect, the camerawork, composition, decor, music and acting are breathtaking and ambiguously nostalgic; what is more remarkable is the magic sense of nature, so rare in Ophuls, and, with the exception of the Archers, King Vidor and Lynne Ramsey, so rare in cinema.
A triptych of Guy de Maupassant stories, it is also about a trio of Gods. The first two are shown to be limited: Maupassant, author, creator, narrator, speaks to us from the darkness, disembodied, all pervasive ('I could be sitting next to you'), responsible for everything we see - in the last story he crashes down to earth, and is responsible for a suicide attempt; and Ophuls' camera, seemingly weightless, able to navigate space with a freedom unavailable to humans - even it is barred from Madame Tellier's Establishment, forced to peek in from outside. It can reveal the bleak reality behind the prostitutes' gaiety, but is has no access, like the men who exploit them, to their souls.
Or does it? The stunning epiphany at the church, is, after all, on one level just a trick of the camera, or a mere figment of the women's imagination. As we would expect, the camerawork, composition, decor, music and acting are breathtaking and ambiguously nostalgic; what is more remarkable is the magic sense of nature, so rare in Ophuls, and, with the exception of the Archers, King Vidor and Lynne Ramsey, so rare in cinema.
- the red duchess
- 13. Aug. 2000
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Le Plaisir?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 2.097 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 37 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.33 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen