Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

create a website
How perceptions of autonomy relate to beliefs about inequality and fairness. (2021). Peters, Ellen ; Mellers, Barbara ; Freundt, Jana ; Bicchieri, Cristina ; Aldama, Abraham.
In: PLOS ONE.
RePEc:plo:pone00:0244387.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 4

Citations received by this document

Cites: 49

References cited by this document

Cocites: 30

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Intrinsic Preferences for Autonomy. (2023). Kopp, Leander ; Herz, Holger ; Freundt, Jana.
    In: FSES Working Papers.
    RePEc:fri:fribow:fribow00530.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Intrinsic Preferences for Autonomy. (2023). Kopp, Leander ; Herz, Holger ; Freundt, Jana.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10342.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Sacrifice: An experiment on the political economy of extreme intergroup punishment. (2022). Kass, Malcolm ; Fatas, Enrique ; Eckel, Catherine C.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:90:y:2022:i:c:s0167487022000058.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Akbaş M., Ariely D. and Yuksel S., "When is inequality fair? An experiment on the effect of procedural justice and agency," J Econ Behav Organ, vol. 161, pp. 114–127., 2019.

  2. Alesina A. and La Ferrara E., "Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities," J Public Econ, vol. 89, no. 5–6, pp. 897–931, 2005.

  3. Alesina A. and Rodrik D., "Distributive politics and economic growth," Q J Econ, vol. 89, no. 5–6, pp. 465–490, 1994.

  4. Alesina A., Di Tella R. and MacCulloch R., "Happiness and inequality: Are Europeans and Americans different?," J Public Econ, vol. 88, no. 9–10, pp. 2009–2042, 2004.

  5. Alesina A., Stantcheva S. and Teso E., "Intergenerational Mobility and preferences for redistribution," Am Econ Rev, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 521–554, 2018.

  6. Bandura A., "Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales.," in Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, vol. 5, Pajares F. and Urdan T., Eds., Information Age Publishing, 2006, pp. 307–337.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Bandura A., "Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning," Educational Psychologist, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 117–148, 1993.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bartels L., "Homer gets a tax cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind," Perspectives on Politics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 15–31, 2005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Benabou R. and Tirole J., "Belief in a just world and redistributive politics," Q J Econ, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 699–746, 2006. PLOS ONE Perceptions of autonomy, inequality, and fairness PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244387 January 13, 2021 16 /

  10. Betz N. E. and Klein K. L., "Relationships among measures of career self-efficacy, generalized self-efficacy, and global self-esteem," J Career Assess, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 285–298., 1996.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Brock J. M., Lange A. and Ozbay E. Y., "Dictating the risk: Experimental evidence on giving in risky environments, " Am Econ Rev, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 415–437, 2013.

  12. Bullock J. G., Gerber A. S., Hill S. J. and Huber G., "Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics," Quart J Polit Sci, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 519–578, 2015.

  13. Cappelen A. W., Hole A. D., Sørensen E. Ø. and Tungodden B., "The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach," Am Econ Rev, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 818–827, 2007.

  14. Cappelen A. W., Konow J., Sørensen E. Ø. and Tungodden B., "Just luck: An experimental study of risk-taking and fairness," Am Econ Rev, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 1398–1413., 2013.

  15. Cappelen A. W., Sørensen E. Ø. and Tungodden B., "Responsibility for what? Fairness and individual responsibility," Eur Econ Rev, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 429–441, 2010.

  16. Cheng S, Wen F. “Americans overestimate the intergenerational persistence in income ranks.” P NATL ACAD SCI USA, 2019 Jul 9; 116(28):13909–14. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814688116 PMID:

  17. Crescioni A. W., Baumeister R. F., Ainsworth S. E., Ent M. and Lambert N. M., "Subjective correlates and consequences of belief in free will.," Philos Psychol, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 41–63, 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Cruces G., Perez-Truglia R. and Tetaz M., "Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment.," J Public Econ, vol. 98, pp. 100–112, 2013.

  19. Deci E. and Ryan R., "The support of autonomy and the control of behavior," J Pers Soc Psychol, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1024–1037, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.53.6.1024 PMID: 3320334
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Deci E. L. and Ryan R. M., "Basic Psychological Needs Scales," 2006. [Online]. Available: m http:// www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Deci E. L. and Ryan R. M., "Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts," in Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 85–107.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Deci E. L. and Ryan R. M., "The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality," J Res Pers, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 109–134, 1985.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Freundt J. and Lange A., "On the determinants of giving under risk," J Econ Behav Organ, vol. 142, pp. 24–31, 2017.

  24. Gimpelson V. and Treisman D., "Misperceiving inequality," Economics & Politics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 27– 54, 2018.

  25. Hussey A. and Jetter M., "Long term trends in fair and unfair inequality in the United States," Appl Econ, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 1147–1163, 2017.

  26. Kahan D. M., Peters E., Dawson E., C. and Slovic P, "Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government, " Behav Public Policy, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–86, 2017.

  27. Kahan D.M., “Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: An experimental study,” Judgm Decis Mak, vol. 8, no.4, pp 407–424, 2013.

  28. Kochhar R. “The American middle class is stable in size, but losing ground financially to upper-income families,” Pew Research Center. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/09/06/ the-american-middle-class-is-stable-in-size-but-losing-ground-financially-to-upper-income-families/ [Accessed November 19, 2020].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Krawczyk M. and Le Lec F., Give me a chance!’An experiment in social decision under risk," Exp Econ, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 500–511, 2010.

  30. Kunda Z., "The Case for Motivated Reasoning," Psychol Bull, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 480–498, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 PMID: 2270237
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Kuziemko I., Norton M. I., Saez E. and Stantcheva S., "How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments," Am Econ Rev, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 1478–1508, 2015.

  32. Lipkus I., "The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale," Pers Individ Dif, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1171–1178, 1991.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Luszczynska A., Scholz U. and Schwarzer R., "The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies," J Psychol, vol. 139, no. 5, pp. 439–457, 2005. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457 PMID: 16285214 PLOS ONE Perceptions of autonomy, inequality, and fairness PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244387 January 13, 2021 15 / 45. Schwarzer R. and Jerusalem M., "Generalized self-efficacy scale," in Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs, vol. 12, Windsor, England, NFER-Nelson, 1995, pp. 35–
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Marks G. and Miller N. "Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review," Psychol Bull, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 72–90, 1987.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Mercier B., Wiwad D., Piff P. K., Aknin L., Robinson A. R. and Shariff A., "Does Belief in Free Will Increase Support for Economic Inequality?," PsyArXiv, no. https://psyarxiv.com/k45ud/, 2018.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Napier J. L. and Jost J. T., "Why are conservatives happier than liberals?," Psychol Sci, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 565–572, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02124.x PMID: 18578846
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Paulhus D. L. and Carey J. M., "The FAD–Plus: Measuring lay beliefs regarding free will and related constructs," J Pers Assess, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 96–104., 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010. 528483 PMID: 21184335
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Peters E., "Beyond comprehension: The role of numeracy in judgments and decisions," Curr Dir Psychol Sci, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Piff P. K., Wiwad D., Robinson R., Aknin L. B., Mercier B. and Shariff A., "Shifting attributions for poverty motivates opposition to inequality and enhances egalitarianism," Nat Hum Behav, 2020. https://doi.org/

  40. Piketty T. and Saez E., "Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998," Q J Econ, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 1–41, 2003.

  41. Piketty T., Saez E. and Zucman G., "Distributional national accounts: methods and estimates for the United States.," Q J Econ, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 553–609, 2017.

  42. Rivenbark J, Arseneault L, Caspi A, Danese A, Fisher HL, Moffitt TE, et al. “Adolescents’ perceptions of family social status correlate with health and life chances: A twin difference longitudinal cohort study.” P NATL ACAD SCI USA. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820845116 PMID: 31907315
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Ross L., Greene D. and House P., "The ‘false consensus effect’: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes," J Exp Soc Psychol, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 279–301, 1977.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Roth C. and Wohlfart J., "Experienced inequality and preferences for redistribution," J Public Econ, vol. 67, pp. 251–262, 2018. PLOS ONE Perceptions of autonomy, inequality, and fairness PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244387 January 13, 2021 14 / 18. Jerit J. and Zhao Y., "Political Misinformation," Annu Rev Polit Sci, vol. 23, pp. 77–94, 2020.

  45. Rothbaum J. and Edwards A. “U.S. Median Household Income was $63,179 in 2018, Not Significantly Different from 2017,” United States Census Bureau. Available from: https://www.census.gov/library/ stories/2019/09/us-median-household-income-not-significantly-different-from-2017.html [Accessed November 30, 2020].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Sands M. L., "Exposure to inequality affects support for redistribution," P Natl Acad Sci USA, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 663–668, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1615010113 PMID: 28069960
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Savani K. and Rattan A., "A choice mind-set increases the acceptance and maintenance of wealth inequality," Psychol Sci, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 796–804, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434540 PMID: 22700330
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Trump K.-S., "Income inequality influences perceptions of legitimate income differences," Br J Polit Sci, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 929–952, 2018.

  49. Weinstein N., Przybylski A. K., & Ryan R. M. “The index of autonomous functioning: Development of a scale of human autonomy.” J Res Pers, 2012, 46(4), 397–413.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Fairness and limited information: Are people Bayesian meritocrats?. (2024). Tungodden, Bertil ; Cappelen, Alexander ; de Haan, Thomas.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:233:y:2024:i:c:s0047272724000331.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Automation anxiety, fairness perceptions, and redistribution: Past experiences condition the response to future job loss. (2024). Matakos, Konstantinos ; Jeffrey, Karen.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:221:y:2024:i:c:p:174-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Inequality shapes the propagation of unethical behaviours: Cheating responses to tax evasion along the income distribution. (2024). Windsteiger, Lisa.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:220:y:2024:i:c:p:135-181.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Non-Meritocrats or Conformist Meritocrats? A Redistribution Experiment in China and France. (2023). Mo, Zhexun ; Huang, Yuchen ; Belguise, Margot.
    In: The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS).
    RePEc:wrk:warwec:1476.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. When merit breeds luck (or not): an experimental study on distributive justice. (2023). Maggian, Valeria ; Longo, Enrico ; Bernasconi, Michele.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ven:wpaper:2023:02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Selfish in payments, selfish in opportunities to obtain the payment. (2023). Castillo, Giselli.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:udc:wpaper:wp544.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Preferences for redistribution in Latin America. (2023). Ibaez, Ana Maria ; Busso, Matias ; Quigua, Juliana ; Messina, Julian.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:120687.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Technological Change, Task Complexity, and Preferences for Redistribution. (2023). Weber, Nina ; Limberg, Julian ; Hope, David.
    In: ifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ifowps:_398.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Do Personal Beliefs and Values Affect an Individual’s “Fraud Tolerance”? Evidence from the World Values Survey. (2022). Mintchik, Natalia ; Knechel, Robert W.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:177:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-020-04704-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Meritocracy as a WEIRD Phenomenon: Fairness Reasoning and Redistributive Preferences across the World. (2022). Mo, Zhexun ; Huang, Yuchen.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-04129246.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Meritocracy as a WEIRD Phenomenon: Fairness Reasoning and Redistributive Preferences across the World. (2022). Mo, Zhexun ; Huang, Yuchen.
    In: World Inequality Lab Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wilwps:halshs-04129246.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Unequal opportunities, social groups, and redistribution: Evidence from Germany. (2022). Kleinlercher, Daniel ; Kirchler, Michael ; Huber, Jurgen ; Schwaiger, Rene ; Weitzel, Utz.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:100:y:2022:i:c:s2214804322000854.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Shallow Meritocracy. (2022). Andre, Peter.
    In: CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2022_318v3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. How perceptions of autonomy relate to beliefs about inequality and fairness. (2021). Peters, Ellen ; Mellers, Barbara ; Freundt, Jana ; Bicchieri, Cristina ; Aldama, Abraham.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0244387.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. When the rich do (not) trust the (newly) rich: Experimental evidence on the effects of positive random shocks in the trust game. (2021). Bejarano, Hernan ; Gillet, Joris ; Rodriguezlara, Ismael.
    In: OSF Preprints.
    RePEc:osf:osfxxx:wmejt.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Risky choices and solidarity: disentangling different behavioural channels. (2021). Wunsch, Conny ; Strobl, Renate.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:24:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10683-020-09694-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. How economic success shapes redistribution: The role of self-serving beliefs, in-group bias and justice principles. (2021). Vergnaud, Jean-Christophe ; de Gardelle, Vincent ; Huber-Yahi, Hlne ; Hainguerlot, Marine ; Dorin, Camille.
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:16:y:2021:i:4:p:932-949.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Empirical research on ethical preferences: how popular is prioritarianism?. (2021). Tarroux, Benoît ; Schokkaert, Erik.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03110312.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Trust and trustworthiness after negative random shocks. (2021). Rodriguez-Lara, Ismael ; Gillet, Joris ; Bejarano, Hernan.
    In: ThE Papers.
    RePEc:gra:wpaper:21/06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Trust and trustworthiness after negative random shocks. (2021). Rodriguez-Lara, Ismael ; Gillet, Joris ; Bejarano, Hernan.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:86:y:2021:i:c:s0167487021000556.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Automation and the future of work: How rhetoric shapes the response in policy preferences. (2021). Jeffrey, Karen.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:192:y:2021:i:c:p:417-433.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Losing sense of fairness: How information about a level playing field reduces selfish behavior. (2021). Persson, Emil ; Tinghog, Gustav ; Davidai, Shai ; Hansson, Kajsa.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:190:y:2021:i:c:p:66-75.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Equal opportunities for all? How income redistribution promotes support for economic inclusion. (2021). Tyran, Jean-Robert ; Reindl, Ilona.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:190:y:2021:i:c:p:390-407.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Shallow Meritocracy: An Experiment on Fairness Views. (2021). Andre, Peter.
    In: ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series.
    RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The impact of gender and ethnic discrimination on redistribution and productivity. (2020). Gunther, Isabel.
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc20:224633.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Unequal Opportunities, Social Groups, and Redistribution. (2020). Weitzel, Utz ; Kleinlercher, Daniel ; Kirchler, Michael ; Huber, Jurgen ; Schwaiger, Rene.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2020-26.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. AGENDA CONTROL AND RECIPROCITY IN SEQUENTIAL VOTING DECISIONS. (2020). Schudy, Simeon ; Fischbacher, Urs.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:58:y:2020:i:4:p:1813-1829.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. PROCEDURAL UNFAIR WAGE DIFFERENTIALS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR. (2020). Rau, Holger A ; Grosch, Kerstin.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:58:y:2020:i:4:p:1689-1706.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-08 02:05:18 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.