Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Empirical research on ethical preferences: how popular is prioritarianism?. (2021). Tarroux, Benoît ; Schokkaert, Erik.
In: Working Papers.
RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03110312.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 99

References cited by this document

Cocites: 32

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abasolo, I. and Tsuchiya, A. (2004). “Exploring social welfare functions and violations of monotonicity: an example from inequalities in health.” Journal of Health Economics, 23: 313-329.

  2. Aguiar, F., Becker, A. and Miller, L. (2013). “Whose impartiality? An experimental study of veiled stakeholders, involved spectators and detached observers.” Economics and Philosophy, 29: 155-174.

  3. Akbas, M., Ariely, D. and Yuksel, S. (2019). “When is inequality fair? An experiment on the effect of procedural justice and agency.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 161: 114-127.

  4. Alesina, A. and Angeletos, G.-M. (2005). “Fairness and redistribution.” American Economic Review, 95: 960-980.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Alesina, A. and Giuliano, P. (2011). “Preferences for redistribution.” In Benhabib, J., Bisin, A. and Jackson, M., eds., Handbook of Social Economics, Vol. 1A. New York: Elsevier, pp. 93-131.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Alesina, A., Stantcheva, S. and Teso, E. (2018). “Intergenerational mobility and support for redistribution. ” American Economic Review, 108: 521-554.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. Almas, I., Cappelen, A. W. and Tungodden, B. (2020). “Cutthroat capitalism versus cuddly socialism: Are Americans more meritocratic and efficiency-seeking than Scandinavians?” Journal of Political Economy, forthcoming.

  8. Almas, I., Cappelen, A. W., Sorensen, E., and Tungodden, B. (2010). “Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance.” Science, 328: 1176-1178.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Amiel, Y. and Cowell, F. (1994). “Monotonicity, dominance and the Pareto principle.” Economics Letters, 45: 447-450.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Amiel, Y. and Cowell, F. (1999). Thinking about inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  11. Amiel, Y., Cowell, F. and Gaertner, W. (2009). “To be or not to be involved: a questionnaire-experimental view on Harsanyi’s utilitarian ethics.” Social Choice and Welfare, 32: 253-274.

  12. Amiel, Y., Cowell, F. and Gaertner, W. (2012). “Distributional orderings: an approach with seven flavours.” Theory and Decision, 73: 381-399.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Amiel, Y., Creedy, J. and Hurn, D. (1999). “Attitudes towards inequality.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101: 83-96.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Andreoni, J. and Miller, J. (2002). “Giving according to garp: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism.” Econometrica, 70: 737-753.

  15. Andreoni, J., Aydin, D., Barton, B., Bernheim, B. D., and Naecker, J. (2020). “When fair isn’t fair: Understanding choice reversals involving social preferences.” Journal of Political Economy, 128: 1673-1711.

  16. Balafoutas, L., Kocher, M. G., Putterman, L. and Sutter, M. (2013). “Equality, equity and incentives: an experiment.” European Economic Review, 60: 32-51.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Ballano, C. and Ruiz-Castillo, J. (1993). “Searching by questionnaire for the meaning of income inequality. ” Revista Espanola de Economia, 10: 233-259.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  18. Becker, A. and Miller, L. M. (2009). “Promoting justice by treating people unequally: an experimental study.” Experimental Economics, 12: 437-449.

  19. Beckman, S. R., Formby, J. P., Smith, W. J. and Zheng, B. (2002). “Envy, malice and pareto efficiency: an experimental examination.” Social Choice and Welfare, 19: 349-367.

  20. Benabou, R. and Ok, E. (2001). “Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: the POUM hypothesis. ” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116: 447-487.

  21. Benabou, R. and Tirole, J. (2006). “Belief in a just world and redistributive politics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121: 699-746.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Bernasconi, M. (2002). “How should income be divided? Questionnaire evidence from the theory of “impartial preferences”. Journal of Economics Supplement, 9: 163-195.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  23. Bleichrodt, H., Rohde, K. and Van Ourti, T. (2012). “An experimental test of the concentration index.” Journal of Health Economics, 31: 86-98.

  24. Bosmans, K. and Schokkaert, E. (2004). “Social welfare, the veil of ignorance and purely individual risk: an empirical examination.” Research on Economic Inequality, 11: 85-114.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Cappelen, A. W., Hole, A. D., Sorensen, E. and Tungodden, B. (2007). “The pluralism of fairness ideals: an experimental approach.” American Economic Review, 97: 818-827.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Cappelen, A. W., Konow, J., Sorensen, E. and Tungodden, B. (2013). “Just luck: An experimental study of risk-taking and fairness.” American Economic Review, 103: 1398-1413.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Cappelen, A. W., Sorensen, E. and Tungodden, B. (2010). “Responsibility for what? Fairness and individual responsibility.” European Economic Review, 54: 429-441.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Carlsson, F., Daruvala, D. and Johansson-Stenman, O. (2005). “Are people inequality averse or just risk averse?” Economica, 72: 375-396.

  29. Cettolin, E. and Riedl, A. (2016). “Justice under uncertainty.” Management Science, 63: 3739-3759.

  30. Charité, J., Fisman, R., and Kuziemko, I. (2015). “Reference points and redistributive preferences: Experimental evidence.” NBER Working Paper No. 21009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Charness, G. and Rabin, M. (2002). “Understanding social preferences with simple tests.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117: 817-869.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Clark, A. and D’Ambrosio, C. (2015). “Attitudes to income inequality: experimental and survey evidence.

  33. Cookson, R., Ali, S., Tsuchiya, A. and Asaria, M. (2018). “E-learning and health inequality aversion: a questionnaire experiment.” Health Economics, 27: 754-1771.

  34. Cooper, D. and Kagel, J. H. (2015). “Other-regarding preferences: A selective survey of experimental results.” In Kagel, J. H. and Roth, A. E., eds., Handbook of experimental economics, Vol. 2. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 217-89.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Costa-Font, J. and Cowell, F. (2019). “Incorporating inequality aversion in health-care priority setting.” Social Justice Research, 32: 172-185.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Cruces, G., Perez-Truglia, R. and Tetaz, M. (2013). “Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: evidence from a survey experiment.”Journal of Public Economics, 98: 100112.

  37. Dickinson, D. L. and Tiefenthaler, J. (2002). “What Is Fair? Experimental Evidence.” Southern Economic Journal, 69: 414-428.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Dolan, P. and Tsuchiya, A. (2011). “Determining the parameters in a social welfare function using stated preference data: an application to health.” Applied Economics, 43: 2241-2250.

  39. Durante, R., Putterman, L., and van der Weele, J. (2014). “Preferences for redistribution and perception of fairness: an experimental study.” Journal of the European Economic Association, 12: 1059-1086.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Edlin, R., Tsuchiya, A. and Dolan, P. (2012). “Public preferences for responsibility versus public preferences for reducing inequalities.” Health Economics, 21: 1416-1426.

  41. Engelmann, D. and Strobel, M. (2004). “Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments.” American Economic Review, 94: 857-869.

  42. Fehr, E., Naef, M., and Schmidt, K. M. (2006). “Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: comment.” American Economic Review, 96: 1912-1917.

  43. Fisman, R., Kariv, S., and Markovits, D. (2007). “Individual preferences for giving.” American Economic Review, 97: 1858-1876.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Fleurbaey, M. and Maniquet, F. (2011). A theory of fairness and social welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  45. Fleurbaey, M. and Maniquet, F. (2018). “Optimal income taxation theory and principles of fairness.” Journal of Economic Literature, 56: 1029-1079.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Fong, C. (2001). “Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics, 82: 225-246.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Frignani, N. and Ponti, G. (2012). “Risk versus social preferences under the veil of ignorance.” Economics Letters, 116: 143-146.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Frohlich, N. and Oppenheimer, J. A. (1990). “Choosing justice in experimental democracies with production. ” American Political Science Review, 84: 461-477.

  49. Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J. A., and Eavey, C. L. (1987a). “Choices of principles of distributive justice in experimental groups.” American Journal of Political Science, 31: 606-636.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J. A., and Eavey, C. L. (1987b). “Laboratory results on Rawls’s distributive justice.” British Journal of Political Science, 17: 1-21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Gaertner, W. and Schokkaert, E. (2012). Empirical social choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Giuliano, P. and Spilimbergo, A. (2014). “Growing up in a recession.” Review of Economic Studies, 81: 787-817.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  53. Glejser, H., Gevers, L., Lambot, P. and Morales, J. (1977). “An econometric study of the variables determining inequality aversion among students.” European Economic Review, 10: 173-188.

  54. Güth, W. and Kliemt, H. (2010). “What ethics can learn from experimental economics - if anything.” European Journal of Political Economy, 26: 302-310.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Harrison, E. and Seidl, C. (1994). “Acceptance of distributional axioms: experimental findings.” In Eichhorn, W., ed., Models and measurement of welfare and inequality. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 67-99.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Harsanyi, J. (1953). “Cardinal utility in welfare economics and the theory of risk-taking.” Journal of Political Economy, 61: 434-435.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Harsanyi, J. (1955). “Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics and interpersonal comparisons of utility.” Journal of Political Economy, 63: 309-321.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Hausman, D. (2015). Valuing health: well-being, freedom, and suffering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Herne, K. and Suojanen, M. (2004). “The role of information in choices over income distributions.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48: 173-193.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Heufer, J., Shachat, J., and Xu, Y. (2018). “Measuring tastes for equity and aggregate wealth behind the veil of ignorance.” Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI 2018-087/I.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Hong, H., Ding, J., and Yao, Y. (2015). “Individual social welfare preferences: an experimental study.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57: 89-97.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  62. Isaksson, A.-S. and Lindskog, A. (2009). “Preferences for redistribution - a country comparison of fairness judgements.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 72: 884-902.

  63. Jancewicz, B. (2016). “Income inequalities: axioms of income inequality measures and people’s perceptions. ” Decyzje, 5: 21-42.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Johansson-Stenman, O., Carlsson, F. and Daruvala, D. (2002). “Measuring future grandparents’ preferences for equality and relative standing.” Economic Journal, 112: 363-383.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Konow, J. (2000). “Fair shares: Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions.” American Economic Review, 90: 1072-1091.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Konow, J. (2001). “Fair and square: the four sides of distributive justice.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46: 137-164.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  67. Konow, J. (2003). “Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories.” Journal of Economic Literature, 41: 1188-1239.

  68. Kuhn, A. (2013). “Inequality Perceptions, Distributional Norms, and Redistributive Preferences in East and West Germany.” German Economic Review, 14: 483-499.

  69. Kuziemko, I., Norton, M., Saez, E. and Stantcheva, S. (2015). “How elastic are preferences for redistribution ? Evidence from randomized survey experiments.” American Economic Review, 105: 1478-1508.

  70. Lal, A., Mohebi, M., Sweeney, R., Moodie, M., Peeters, A. and Carter, R. (2019). “Equity weights for socioeconomic position: two methods - survey of stated preferences and epidemiological data.” Value in Health, 22: 247-253.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Leibler, J., Zwack, L. and Levy, J. (2009). “Agreement with inequality axioms and perceptions of inequality among environmental justice and risk assessment professionals.” Health, Risk & Society, 11: 5569.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Luce, R. and Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions. New York: Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Luttmer, E. and Singhal, M. (2011). “Culture, context, and the taste for redistribution.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3: 157-179.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. McClelland, G. and Rohrbaugh, J. (1978).“Who accepts the Pareto axiom? The role of utility and equity in arbitration decisions.” Behavioral Science, 23: 446-456.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Miller, D. (1992). “Distributive justice: what the people think.” Ethics, 102: 555-593.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Mollerstrom, J., Reme, B.-A., and Sorensen, E. (2015). “Luck, choice and responsibility. An experimental study of fairness views.” Journal of Public Economics, 131: 33-40.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  77. Muller, D. and Renes, S. (2020). “Fairness views and political preferences: evidence from a large and heterogeneous sample.” Social Choice and Welfare, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-020-01289-5.

  78. Nord, E. (1995). “The person-trade-off approach to valuing health care programs.” Medical Decision Making 15: 201-208.

  79. Ottersen, T., Maestad, O. and Norheim, O. (2014). “Lifetime QALY prioritarianism in priority setting: quantification of the inherent trade-off.” Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Pinto-Prades, J.-L. and Abellán-Perpiñán (2005). “Measuring the health of populations: the veil of ignorance approach.” Health Economics,14: 69-82.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  81. Pirttilä, J. and Uusitalo, R. (2010). “A ‘leaky bucket’ in the real world: estimating inequality aversion using survey data.” Economica, 77: 60-76.

  82. Rawls, J. (1958). “Justice as fairness.” Philosophical Review, 67: 164-194.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  84. Robson, M., Asaria, M., Cookson, R., Tsuchiya, A. and Ali, S. (2017). “Eliciting the level of health inequality aversion in England.” Health Economics, 26: 1328-1334.

  85. Roemer, J. (1996). Theories of distributive justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  86. Rohde, I. M. and Rohde, K. I. (2015). “Managing social risks - tradeoffs between risks and inequalities.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 51: 103-124.

  87. Saez, E. and Stantcheva, S. (2013). “Generalized social marginal welfare weights for optimal tax theory.” NBER: Working Paper 18835.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Schildberg-Hörisch, H. (2010). “Is the veil of ignorance only a concept about risk? An experiment.” Journal of Public Economics, 94: 1062-1066.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Schokkaert, E. and Truyts, T. (2017). “Preferences for redistribution and social structure.” Social Choice and Welfare, 49: 545-576.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Sen, A. (2009).The idea of justice. London: Allen Lane.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  91. Tarroux, B. (2015). “Comparing two-dimensional distributions: a questionnaire-experimental approach.” Social Choice and Welfare, 44: 87-108.

  92. Tarroux, B. (2019). “The value of tax progressivity: evidence from survey experiments.” Journal of Public Economics 179: Article 104068.

  93. Traub, S., Seidl, C., and Schmidt, U. (2009). “An experimental study on individual choice, social welfare, and social preferences.” European Economic Review, 53: 385-400.

  94. Traub, S., Seidl, C., Schmidt, U., and Levati, M. V. (2005). “Friedman, Harsanyi, Rawls, Boulding -or somebody else? An experimental investigation of distributive justice.” Social Choice and Welfare, 24: 283-309.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  95. Weinzierl, M. (2014). “The promise of positive optimal taxation: normative diversity and a role of equal sacrifice.” Journal of Public Economics, 118: 128-142.

  96. Weinzierl, M. (2017). “A welfarist role for nonwelfarist rules: an example with envy.” Harvard Business School: Working Paper 17-021.

  97. Weinzierl, M. (2017). “Popular acceptance of inequality due to innate brute luck and support for classical benefit-based taxation.” Journal of Public Economics, 155: 54-63.

  98. Yaari, M. and Bar-Hillel, M. (1984). “On dividing justly.” Social Choice and Welfare, 1: 1-24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  99. Yamamura, E. (2015). “Effects of siblings and birth order on income redistribution preferences: evidence based on Japanese General Social Survey.” Social Indicators Research, 121: 589-606.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Aversion to Health Inequality - Pure, Income-Related and Income-Caused. (2023). van Ourti, Tom ; Odonnell, Owen ; Robson, Matthew.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20230019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Empirical research on ethical preferences: how popular is prioritarianism?. (2021). Tarroux, Benoît ; Schokkaert, Erik.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03110312.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Empirical research on ethical preferences: how popular is prioritarianism?. (2021). Schokkaert, Erik ; Tarroux, Benoit.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gat:wpaper:2104.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Does the UK-publics aversion to inequalities in health differ by group-labelling and health-gain type? A choice-experiment. (2021). Holmes, John ; Tsuchiya, Aki ; McNamara, Simon.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:269:y:2021:i:c:s0277953620307929.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. How averse are the UK general public to inequalities in health between socioeconomic groups? A systematic review. (2020). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Stevely, Abigail K ; Holmes, John ; McNamara, Simon.
    In: The European Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:21:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10198-019-01126-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Violations of dominance in decision-making. (2019). Bauer, Thomas ; Kourouxous, Thomas.
    In: Business Research.
    RePEc:spr:busres:v:12:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40685-019-0093-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Equal access for equal need: Eliciting public preferences for access to health treatment by employment status. (2019). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Powell, Philip A ; Gibbs, Naomi.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:222:y:2019:i:c:p:246-255.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. E‐learning and health inequality aversion: A questionnaire experiment. (2018). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Asaria, Miqdad ; Ali, Shehzad ; Cookson, Richard.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:27:y:2018:i:11:p:1754-1771.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Weighting Health Outcomes by Socioeconomic Position Using Stated Preferences. (2018). Peeters, Anna ; Moodie, Marjory ; Siahpush, Mohammad ; Lal, Anita ; Carter, Robert.
    In: PharmacoEconomics - Open.
    RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:2:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s41669-017-0036-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The views of the general public on prioritising vaccination programmes against childhood diseases: A qualitative study. (2018). Christensen, Hannah ; Carroll, Fran E ; Trotter, Caroline L ; Al-Janabi, Hareth ; Lasseter, Gemma.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0197374.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. E‐learning and health inequality aversion: a questionnaire experiment. (2018). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Asaria, Miqdad ; Ali, Shehzad ; Cookson, Richard.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:89393.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Consensus income distribution. (2017). Stark, Oded ; Jakubek, Marcin ; Falniowski, Fryderyk.
    In: University of Tuebingen Working Papers in Economics and Finance.
    RePEc:zbw:tuewef:96.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Eliciting the level of health inequality aversion in England. (2017). Asaria, Miqdad ; Ali, Shehzad ; Tsuchiya, Aki ; Cookson, Richard ; Robson, Matthew.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:101254.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Consensus Income Distribution. (2017). Addison, Tony ; Jakubek, Marcin ; Falniowski, Fryderyk ; Stark, Oded ; Tarp, Finn ; Pirttila, Yukka.
    In: Review of Income and Wealth.
    RePEc:bla:revinw:v:63:y:2017:i:4:p:899-911.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Consensus income distribution. (2016). Stark, Oded ; Jakubek, Marcin ; Falniowski, Fryderyk.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:ags:ubzefd:250120.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Attributes and weights in health care priority setting: A systematic review of what counts and to what extent. (2015). Lancsar, Emily ; Gu, Yuanyuan ; Ghijben, Peter ; Donaldson, Cam ; Rg, James .
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:146:y:2015:i:c:p:41-52.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Estimating sign-dependent societal preferences for quality of life. (2015). l'Haridon, Olivier ; Brouwer, Werner ; Attema, Arthur ; Pinto, Jose Luis ; Lharidon, Olivier.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:43:y:2015:i:c:p:229-243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Estimating sign-dependent societal preferences for quality of life. (2014). pinto-prades, jose-luis ; l'Haridon, Olivier ; Brouwer, Werner ; Attema, Arthur.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:58262.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. A Person Trade-Off Study to Estimate Age-Related Weights for Health Gains in Economic Evaluation. (2013). Petrou, Stavros ; Baker, Rachel ; Kandala, Ngianga-Bakwin ; Robinson, Angela.
    In: PharmacoEconomics.
    RePEc:spr:pharme:v:31:y:2013:i:10:p:893-907.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Inequality and Risk Aversion in Health and Income: An Empirical Analysis Using Hypothetical Scenarios with Losses. (2013). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Abasolo, Ignacio.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:shf:wpaper:2013005.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Egalitarianism and Altruism in Health: To What Extent Are They Related?. (2013). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Abasolo, Ignacio.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:shf:wpaper:2013003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Is more health always better for society? Exploring public preferences that violate monotonicity. (2013). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Abasolo, Ignacio.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:74:y:2013:i:4:p:539-563.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Distributional Judgements in the Context of Economic Evaluation. (2012). Tsuchiya, Aki.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:14021_38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. A universal preference for equality in health? Reasons to reconsider properties of applied social welfare functions. (2012). Mæstad, Ottar ; Norheim, Ole Frithjof ; Mastad, Ottar .
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:75:y:2012:i:10:p:1836-1843.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Equality of what in health? Distinguishing between outcome egalitarianism and gain egalitarianism. (2009). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Dolan, Paul.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:18:y:2009:i:2:p:147-159.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Aversion to geographic inequality and geographic variation in preferences in the context of healthcare. (2009). Quintal, Carlota.
    In: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy.
    RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:7:y:2009:i:2:p:121-136.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Understanding preference for egalitarian policies in health: are age and sex determinants?. (2008). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Abasolo, Ignacio.
    In: Applied Economics.
    RePEc:taf:applec:v:40:y:2008:i:19:p:2451-2461.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Policy options for a public long-term care system in Spain: a microsimulation model. (2008). Marin, David Casado ; Casadomarin, David .
    In: Hacienda Pública Española.
    RePEc:hpe:journl:y:2008:v:186:i:3:p:61-90.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Health inequality and non-monotonicity of the health related social welfare function: A rejoinder. (2007). Dutta, Indranil.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:26:y:2007:i:2:p:426-429.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Exploring social welfare functions and violation of monotonicity: an example from inequalities in health--a reply to Jan Abel Olsen. (2004). Tsuchiya, Aki ; Abasolo, Ignacio.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:23:y:2004:i:2:p:333-334.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-30 07:53:11 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.