Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Publishing while Female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review.. (2017). Hengel, Erin.
In: Cambridge Working Papers in Economics.
RePEc:cam:camdae:1753.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 67

Citations received by this document

Cites: 136

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Journal Authorship by Gender: A Comparison of Economic Education, General Interest, and Fields From 2009 to 2019. (2023). Marshall, Emily ; Oaroark, Brian.
    In: The American Economist.
    RePEc:sae:amerec:v:68:y:2023:i:1:p:100-109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. How women saved agricultural economics. (2022). McCluskey, Jill ; Offutt, Susan.
    In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.
    RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:44:y:2022:i:1:p:4-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Women in Economics: Europe and the World. (2022). Auriol, Emmanuelle ; Wilhelm, Sascha ; Weinberger, Alisa ; Friebel, Guido.
    In: TSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:tse:wpaper:126450.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Diferenciales salariales de género y sus determinantes para el personal académico en propiedad en la Universidad de Costa Rica. (Gender wage differentials and its determinants for tenured academics at. (2022). Blanco, Laura C.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fcr:wpaper:202205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Diferenciales salariales de género y sus determinantes para el personal académico en propiedad en la Universidad de Costa Rica. (Gender wage differentials and its determinants for tenured academics at. (2022). Blanco, Laura C.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fcr:wpaper:202204.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Ungendered writing: Writing styles are unlikely to account for gender differences in funding rates in the natural and technical sciences. (2022). Sainte-Marie, Maxime ; Schneider, Jesper W.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:16:y:2022:i:4:s1751157722000840.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. A study of referencing changes in preprint-publication pairs across multiple fields. (2022). Squazzoni, Flaminio ; Stephen, Dimity ; Akbaritabar, Aliakbar.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:16:y:2022:i:2:s1751157722000104.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The effect of writing style on success in grant applications. (2022). Mom, Charlie ; van den Besselaar, Peter ; Vandenbesselaar, Peter.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:16:y:2022:i:1:s1751157722000098.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. What 5,000 acknowledgements tell us about informal collaboration in financial economics. (2021). Rose, Michael E ; Georg, Co-Pierre.
    In: Kiel Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:ifwkwp:2182.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Innovative ideas and gender inequality. (2021). Koffi, Marlene.
    In: CLEF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:clefwp:35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. A Comparative Analysis of Men and Women’s Hourly Earnings in Poland with Particular Emphasis on the Education Sector. (2021). Olga, Zajkowska ; Marian, Rusek ; Joanna, Landmesser.
    In: Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia.
    RePEc:vrs:foeste:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:18-30:n:7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Women in research in economics in Uruguay. (2021). Moraes, María Inés ; Bucheli, Marisa ; AMARANTE, VERONICA ; Perez, Tatiana.
    In: Documentos de Trabajo (working papers).
    RePEc:ulr:wpaper:dt-01-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Gender and leadership in organizations: Promotions, demotions and angry workers. (2021). Serra, Danila ; Chakraborty, Priyanka.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:txm:wpaper:20210104-001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Promoting inclusive metrics of success and impact to dismantle a discriminatory reward system in science. (2021). Spalding, Ana K ; Fulweiler, Robinson W ; Smith, Nicola S ; Duplouy, Anne ; Silbiger, Nyssa J ; Cote, Isabelle M ; Rivera, Hanny E ; Crosby, Sarah C ; Parker, Laura M ; Bove, Colleen B ; Metaxas, Anna ; Baum, Julia K ; Mangubhai, Sangeeta ; Ainsworth, Tracy ; Bates, Amanda E ; Humanes, Adriana ; Putnam, Hollie M ; Wright, Rachel M ; Hill, Tessa ; Davies, Sarah W ; Weigel, Brooke L ; Hanley, Torrance C ; Traylor-Knowles, Nikki ; Griffin, Alyssa J.
    In: PLOS Biology.
    RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001282.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download

  15. The pregnancy drop: How teaching evaluations penalize pregnant faculty. (2021). Olabisi, Ronke M.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:8:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-021-00926-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Does Mentoring Increase the Collaboration Networks of Female Economists? An Evaluation of the CeMENT Randomized Trial. (2021). Ginther, Donna.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28727.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The gender gap in citations of articles published in two demographic economics journals. (2021). Yilmazer, Tansel ; Grossbard, Shoshana ; Zhang, Lingrui.
    In: Review of Economics of the Household.
    RePEc:kap:reveho:v:19:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11150-020-09508-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Measuring Research Excellence Amongst Economics Lecturers in the UK. (2021). Sechel, Cristina ; Mumford, Karen A ; McManus, Richard.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp14156.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. What 5,000 acknowledgements tell us about informal collaboration in financial economics. (2021). Rose, Michael ; Georg, Co-Pierre.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:50:y:2021:i:6:s0048733321000408.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Under pressure: How faculty gender and contract uncertainty impact students’ grades. (2021). Sovero, Veronica ; Griffith, Amanda L.
    In: Economics of Education Review.
    RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:83:y:2021:i:c:s0272775721000455.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Gender differences in the academic career of economics in Brazil. (2021). Borges, Bruna ; Narita, Renata ; Montoya, Maria Dolores ; Matsunaga, Liz ; Fabiana, Paula Pereda.
    In: Revista Cuadernos de Economía.
    RePEc:col:000093:020188.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Remote talks: changes to economics seminars during Covid-19. (2021). Biermann, Marcus .
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1759.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Dimensions of Poverty. Measurement, Epistemic Injustices and Social Activism. (2021). Flechtner, Svenja.
    In: Review of Income and Wealth.
    RePEc:bla:revinw:v:67:y:2021:i:2:p:530-544.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Gender Gaps in the Evaluation of Research: Evidence from Submissions to Economics Conferences. (2021). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
    In: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics.
    RePEc:bla:obuest:v:83:y:2021:i:3:p:590-618.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Does Mentoring Increase the Collaboration Networks of Female Economists? An Evaluation of the CeMENT Randomized Trial. (2021). Ginther, Donna ; Na, Rina .
    In: AEA Papers and Proceedings.
    RePEc:aea:apandp:v:111:y:2021:p:80-85.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Explicit and implicit belief-based gender discrimination: A hiring experiment. (2020). Barron, Kai ; Schweighofer-Kodritsch, Sebastian ; Gehrig, Stefan ; Ditlmann, Ruth.
    In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbeoc:spii2020306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Geographical Concentration and Editorial Favoritism within the Field of Laboratory Experimental Economics (RM/19/029-revised-). (2020). Greiff, Matthias ; Cloos, Janis ; Rusch, Hannes.
    In: Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umagsb:2020014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Write better, publish better. (2020). Marino Fages, Diego.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:122:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03332-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Cross-Program Differences in Returns to Education and the Gender Earnings Gap. (2020). Andersen, Steffen ; Shore, Stephen H ; Dastous, Philippe ; Martinez-Correa, Jimmy .
    In: Working papers.
    RePEc:rie:riecdt:48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Linguistic Metrics for Patent Disclosure: Evidence from University Versus Corporate Patents. (2020). Jaffe, Adam ; Dulleck, Uwe ; Vajjala, Sowmya ; Sun, Shupeng ; Kong, Nancy.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27803.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Does Economics Make You Sexist?. (2020). Paserman, M. Daniele ; Pino, Francisco ; Paredes, Valentina A.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27070.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Gender and quality at top economics journals. (2020). Moon, Eunyoung ; Hengel, Erin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:liv:livedp:202001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Gender differences in submission strategies? A survey of early-career economists. (2020). Gravert, Christina ; Sorensen, Katrine Thornfeldt.
    In: CEBI working paper series.
    RePEc:kud:kucebi:2022.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Women in Economics: A UK Perspective. (2020). Sevilla, Almudena ; Gamage, Danula K ; Smith, Sarah.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp13477.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Does Economics Make You Sexist?. (2020). Pino, Francisco J ; Paserman, Daniele M ; Paredes, Valentina.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp13223.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. The Black-White Recognition Gap in Award Nominations. (2020). Ba, Bocar ; Kiss, Andrea ; Rivera, Roman ; Rim, Nayoung.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hka:wpaper:2020-065.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Women in economics: A UK Perspective. (2020). Smith, Sarah ; Sevilla, Almudena.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:15034.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Does Economics Make You Sexist. (2020). Pino, Francisco ; Paserman, M. Daniele ; Paredes, Valentina A.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:14723.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Linguistic Metrics for Patent Disclosure: Evidence from University versus Corporate Patents. (2020). Dulleck, Uwe ; Jaffe, Adam ; Kong, Nancy ; Vajjala, Sowmya ; Sun, Shupeng.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8571.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The Unequal Effects of Covid-19 on Economists Research Productivity. (2020). Giannitsarou, Chryssi ; Hasna, Z ; Faraglia, E ; Amano-Patio, N.
    In: Cambridge Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cam:camdae:2038.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Women in economics: A UK Perspective. (2020). Smith, Sarah ; Sevilla, Almudena ; Gamage, Danula K.
    In: Bristol Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:bri:uobdis:20/725.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Pay and Job Rank among Academic Economists in the UK: Is Gender Relevant?. (2020). Mumford, Karen ; Sechel, Cristina.
    In: British Journal of Industrial Relations.
    RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:58:y:2020:i:1:p:82-113.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. The Gender Pay Gap in Academia: Evidence from the Ohio State University. (2019). Crown, Daniel ; Chen, Joyce J.
    In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:101:y:2019:i:5:p:1337-1352.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Male principal investigators (almost) don’t publish with women in ecology and zoology. (2019). Stynoski, Jennifer L ; Guayasamin, Juan M ; Paez-Vacas, Monica ; Salerno, Patricia E.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0218598.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Networking Frictions in Venture Capital, and the Gender Gap in Entrepreneurship. (2019). Nanda, Ramana ; Howell, Sabrina T.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:26449.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?. (2019). Iriberri, Nagore ; Funk, Patricia ; DellaVigna, Stefano ; Card, David.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25967.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Is Blinded Review Enough? How Gendered Outcomes Arise Even Under Anonymous Evaluation. (2019). Murray, Fiona ; Fuentes-Medel, Yuly ; Kolev, Julian.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25759.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Variation in Women’s Success Across PhD Programs in Economics. (2019). Langan, Andrew ; Boustan, Leah.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25444.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Art and gender: market bias or selection bias?. (2019). Goetzmann, William ; Nozari, Milad ; Cameron, Laurie.
    In: Journal of Cultural Economics.
    RePEc:kap:jculte:v:43:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10824-019-09339-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  51. Gender Gaps in the Evaluation of Research: Evidence from Submissions to Economics Conferences. (2019). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12494.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  52. Pay and Job Rank Amongst Academic Economists in the UK: Is Gender Relevant?. (2019). Sechel, Cristina ; Mumford, Karen.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12397.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  53. Educational gender gaps and economic growth: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. (2019). Zenker, Juliane ; Klasen, Stephan ; Vollmer, Sebastian ; Minasyan, Anna.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:122:y:2019:i:c:p:199-217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  54. Gender stereotypes: The case of MisProfesores.com in Mexico. (2019). Arceo-Gomez, Eva ; Campos-Vazquez, Raymundo M.
    In: Economics of Education Review.
    RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:72:y:2019:i:c:p:55-65.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  55. Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?. (2019). Iriberri, Nagore ; Funk, Patricia ; Dellavigna, Stefano ; Della Vigna, Stefano ; Card, David.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:13789.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  56. Gender gaps in the evaluation of research: evidence from submissions to economics conferences. (2019). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bde:wpaper:1918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  57. How Do Nascent Social Entrepreneurs Respond to Rewards? A Field Experiment on Motivations in a Grant Competition. (2018). le Coq, Chloe ; Huysentruyt, Marieke ; Ganguli, Ina.
    In: UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:ums:papers:2018-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  58. Tweeting Economists: Antisocial in the socials?. (2018). Della Giusta, Marina ; Jaworska, Sylvia ; Vukadinovic-Greetham, Danica.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:89527.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  59. Nevertheless She Persisted? Gender Peer Effects in Doctoral STEM Programs. (2018). Weinberg, Bruce ; Bostwick, Valerie.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25028.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  60. The Gender Gap in Citations: Lessons from Demographic Economics Journals. (2018). Yilmazer, Tansel ; Grossbard, Shoshana ; Zhang, Lingrui.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hka:wpaper:2018-078.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  61. How Do Nascent Social Entrepreneurs Respond to Rewards? A Field Experiment on Motivations in a Grant Competition. (2018). Huysentruyt, Marieke ; le Coq, Chloe ; Ganguli, Ina.
    In: SITE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:hasite:0046.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  62. Viewpoint: Beasts of the field? Ethics in agricultural and applied economics. (2018). Michler, Jeffrey ; Josephson, Anna.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:79:y:2018:i:c:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  63. Easy to read, easy to cite?. (2018). Dowling, Michael ; Zreik, Ousayna ; Hammami, Helmi.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:173:y:2018:i:c:p:100-103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  64. Selective matching: gender gap and network formation in research. (2018). GIVORD, Pauline ; Combes, Stephanie.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:crs:wpaper:2018-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  65. Gender & Collaboration. (2018). Ductor, Lorenzo ; Prummer, A ; Goyal, S.
    In: Cambridge Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cam:camdae:1820.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. — (1994). “Gender Comparisons in Responsiveness to Others’ Evaluations in Achievement Settings”. Psychology of Women Quarterly 18, pp. 221–240.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. — (2003b). “Using New Technology to Assess the Academic Writing Styles of Male and Female Pairs and Individuals”. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 33 (3), pp. 243–261.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. — (2016). “Publishing while Female: Gender Differences in Peer Review Scrutiny”. Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. — (2017). “Recognition for Group Work: Gender Differences in Academia”. American Economic Review 107 (5), pp. 141–145.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. — (2017). “What do Editors Maximize? Evidence from Four Leading Economics Journals ”. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 23282.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Abrevaya, J. and D. S. Hamermesh (2012). “Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (to Each Other)?” Review of Economics and Statistics 94 (1), pp. 202– 207.

  7. Ali, O. et al. (2010). “Automating News Content Analysis: An Application to Gender Bias and Readability”. Workshop on Applications of Pattern Analysis 11, pp. 36–43.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Altonji, J. G. and C. R. Pierret (2001). “Employer Learning and Statistical Discrimination”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (1), pp. 313–350.

  9. Antecol, H., K. Bedard, and J. Stearns (2016). “Equal but Inequitable: Who Benefits from Gender-Neutral Tenure Clock Stopping Policies?” IZA Discussion Paper Series, No. 9904.

  10. Arellano, M. and O. Bover (1995). “Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-components Models”. Journal of Econometrics 68 (1), pp. 29–51.

  11. Arellano, M. and S. Bond (1991). “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations”. Review of Economic Studies 58 (2), p. 277.

  12. Arrow, K. (1973). “The Theory of Discrimination”. In: Discrimination in Labor Markets. Ed. by O. Ashenfelter and A. Rees. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Chap. 1, pp. 16–195.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  13. Artz, B., A. H. Goodall, and A. J. Oswald (2016). “Do Women Ask ?” IZA Discussion Paper Series, No. 10183.

  14. Ashenfelter, O. and A. Krueger (1994). “Estimates of the Economic Return to Schooling from a New Sample of Twins”. American Economic Review 84 (5), pp. 1157–1173.

  15. Azmat, G. and R. Ferrer (2017). “Gender Gaps in Performance: Evidence from Young Lawyers”. Journal of Political Economy 125 (5), pp. 1306–1355.

  16. Babcock, L. and S. Laschever (2003). Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Baker, K. J. (2015). “Should Academic Conferences Have Codes of Conduct?” Chronicle Vitae. https://chroniclevitae.com/news/1182- should- academic- conferences- havecodes -of-conduct. Accessed: 2016-10-04.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Bandiera, O. (2016). The Gender and Ethnicity Earnings Gap at LSE. Tech. rep. September. London School of Economics.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Becker, G. S. (1957). The Economics of Discrimination. 2nd ed. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Begeny, J. C. and D. J. Greene (2014). “Can Readability Formulas Be Used to Successfully Gauge Difficulty of Reading Materials?” Psychology in the Schools 51 (2), pp. 198–215.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Benedetti, T. J. et al. (2004). “The Productivity of Washington State’s Obstetrician–Gynecologist Workforce: Does Gender Make a Difference?” Obstetrics and Gynecology 103 (3), pp. 499– 505.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Benoit, K., K. Munger, and A. Spirling (2017). “Measuring and Explaining Political Sophistication through Textual Complexity”. Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  23. Berk, J. B., C. R. Harvey, and D. Hirshleifer (2017). “How to Write an Effective Referee Report and Improve the Scientific Review Process”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 31 (1), pp. 231–244.

  24. Bertrand, M. and S. Mullainathan (2004). “Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination”. American Economic Review 94 (4), pp. 991–1013.

  25. Bertrand, M., C. Goldin, and L. F. Katz (2010). “Dynamics of the Gender Gap for Young Professionals in the Financial and Corporate Sectors”. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2 (3), pp. 228–255.

  26. Biddle, C. and J. Aker (1996). “How Does the Peer Review Process Influence AANA Journal Article Readability?” AANA Journal 64 (1), pp. 65–68.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  27. Blank, R. M. (1991). “The Effects of Double-blind versus Single-blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from the American Economic Review”. American Economic Review 81 (5), pp. 1041–1067.

  28. Blau, F. D. and L. M. Kahn (2016). “The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations ”. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 21913.

  29. Bloor, K., N. Freemantle, and A. Maynard (2008). “Gender and Variation in Activity Rates of Hospital Consultants”. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 101 (1), pp. 27–33.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Blundell, R. and S. Bond (1998). “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models”. Journal of Econometrics 87 (1), pp. 115–143.

  31. Boring, A. (2017). “Gender Biases in Student Evaluations of Teaching”. Journal of Public Economics 145 (Supplement C), pp. 27–41.

  32. Borsuk, R. M. et al. (2009). “To Name or Not to Name: The Effect of Changing Author Gender on Peer Review”. BioScience 59 (11), pp. 985–989.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  33. Bransch, F. and M. Kvasnicka (2017). “Male Gatekeepers Gender Bias in the Publishing Process?” IZA Discussion Paper Series, No. 11089.

  34. Bright, L. K. (2017). “Decision Theoretic Model of the Productivity Gap”. Erkenntnis 82 (2), pp. 421–442.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Budden, A. E. et al. (2008a). “Double-blind Review Favours Increased Representation of Female Authors”. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23 (1), pp. 4–6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Budden, A. E. et al. (2008b). “Response to Webb et al.: Double-blind Review: Accept with Minor Revisions”. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23 (7), pp. 353–354.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Budden, A. E. et al. (2008c). “Response to Whittaker: Challenges in Testing for Gender Bias”. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23 (9), pp. 480–481.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Canadian Institute for Health Information (2005). Canada’s Health Care Providers. https: //secure.cihi.ca/free_products/HCP_Chartbook05_e.pdf. Accessed: 2017-01-10.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  39. Card, D. and S. DellaVigna (2013). “Nine Facts about Top Journals in Economics”. Journal of Economic Literature 51 (1), pp. 144–161.

  40. Ceci, S. J. et al. (2014). “Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape”. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 15 (3), pp. 75–141.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Chall, J. S. and E. Dale (1995). Readability Revisited: The New Dale-Chall Readability Formula. Brookline Books.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  42. Chari, A. and P. Goldsmith-Pinkham (2017). “Gender Representation in Economics Across Topics and Time: Evidence from the NBER Summer Institute”. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 23953.

  43. Chung, J. and G. S. Monroe (2001). “A Research Note on the Effects of Gender and Task Complexity on an Audit Judgment”. Behavioral Research in Accounting 13 (1), pp. 111– 125.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Clain, S. H. and K. Leppel (2017). “Patterns in Economics Journal Acceptances and Rejections ”. American Economist (forthcoming).

  45. Coate, S. and G. C. Loury (1993). “Will Affirmative-Action Policies Eliminate Negative Stereotypes?” American Economic Review 83 (5), pp. 1220–1240.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Correll, S. and C. Simard (2016). “Research: Vague Feedback Is Holding Women Back”.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Cortés, P. and J. Pan (2016). “Prevalence of Long Hours and Women’s Job Choices: Evidence across Countries and within the U.S.” IZA Discussion Paper Series, No. 10225.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Costa, P. T., A. Terracciano, and R. R. McCrae (2001). “Gender Differences in Personality Traits Across Cultures: Robust and Surprising Findings”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2), pp. 322–331.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  49. Craig, A. and R. Fryer (2017). “Complementary Bias: A Model of Two-Sided Statistical Discrimination”. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 23811.

  50. Dale, E. and J. S. Chall (1948). “A Formula for Predicting Readability”. Educational Research Bulletin 27 (1), pp. 11–20.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. DuBay, W. H. (2004). The Principles of Readability. Costa Mesa, California: Impact Information.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  52. Ellison, G. (2002). “The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process”. Journal of Political Economy 110 (5), pp. 947–993.

  53. Faigley, L. and S. P. Witte (1981). “Analyzing Revision”. College Composition and Communication 32 (4), pp. 400–414.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Family, H., M. Weiss, and J. Sutton (2013). The Effects of Mental Workload on Community Pharmacists’ Ability to Detect Dispensing Errors. Tech. rep. Pharmacy Research UK.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Fang, F. C., J. W. Bennett, and A. Casadevall (2013). “Males Are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct”. mBio 4 (1), pp. 1–3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Feingold, A. (1994). “Gender Differences in Personality: A Meta-analysis”. Psychological Bulletin 116 (3), pp. 429–456.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Firth-Cozens, J. (2008). “Doctors with Difficulties: Why So Few Women?” Postgraduate Medical Journal 84 (992), pp. 318–320.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Foschi, M. (1996). “Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women”. Social Psychology Quarterly 59 (3), pp. 237–254.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Francis, D. J. et al. (2008). “Form Effects on the Estimation of Students’ Oral Reading Fluency Using DIBELS”. Journal of School Psychology 46 (3), pp. 315–342.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  60. Fryer, R. G., D. Pager, and J. L. Spenkuch (2013). “Racial Disparities in Job Finding and Offered Wages”. Journal of Law and Economics 56 (3), pp. 633–689.

  61. Gans, J. S. and G. B. Shepherd (1994). “How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (1), pp. 165–179.

  62. Gilbert, J. R., E. S. Williams, and G. D. Lundberg (1994). “Is There Gender Bias in JAMA’s Peer Review Process?” Journal of the American Medical Association 272 (2), pp. 139–142.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  63. Ginther, D. K. and S. Kahn (2004). “Women in Economics: Moving Up or Falling Off the Academic Career Ladder?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (3), pp. 193–214.

  64. Glover, D., A. Pallais, and W. Pariente (2017). “Discrimination as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: Evidence from French Grocery Stores”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 132 (3), pp. 1219– 1260.

  65. Goldin, C. (2014). “A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter”. American Economic Review 104 (4), pp. 1091–1119.

  66. Goldin, C. and C. Rouse (2000). “Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians”. American Economic Review 90 (4), pp. 715–741.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  67. Goldin, C. and L. F. Katz (2016). “A Most Egalitarian Profession: Pharmacy and the Evolution of a Family-Friendly Occupation”. Journal of Labor Economics 34 (3), pp. 705– 746.

  68. Gordon, M. B. et al. (2009). “Gender Differences in Research Grant Applications for Pediatric Residents”. Pediatrics 124 (2), e355–61.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Grunspan, D. Z. et al. (2016). “Males Under-estimate Academic Performance of Their Female Peers in Undergraduate Biology Classrooms”. PLOS ONE 11 (2), pp. 1–16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  70. Hamermesh, D. S. (1994). “Facts and Myths about Refereeing”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (1), pp. 153–163.

  71. Hartley, J., J. W. Pennebaker, and C. Fox (2003a). “Abstracts, Introductions and Discussions: How Far Do They Differ in Style?” Scientometrics 57 (3), pp. 389–398.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Hartvigsen, M. K. (1981). “A Comparative Study of Quality and Syntactic Maturity between In-class and Out-of-class Writing Samples of Freshmen at Washington State University”. PhD thesis. Washington State University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2014/08/why-women-dont-apply-for-jobsunless -theyre-100-qualified. Accessed: 2017-11-16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/04/research- vague- feedback- isholding -women-back. Accessed: 2016-10-04.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Hatamyar, P. W. and K. M. Simmons (2004). “Are Women More Ethical Lawyers? An Empirical Study”. Florida State University Law Review 31 (4), pp. 785–858.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Hayden, J. D. (2008). “Readability in the British Journal of Surgery”. British Journal of Surgery 95 (1), pp. 119–124.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Heilman, M. E. and M. C. Haynes (2005). “No Credit Where Credit Is Due: Attributional Rationalization of Women’s Success in Male-female Teams”. Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (5), pp. 905–916.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Hengel, E. (2015). “Two Essays on Bankruptcy and One Essay on Gender Differences in Academic Publishing”. PhD thesis. University of Cambridge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Hintze, J. M. and T. J. Christ (2004). “An Examination of Variability as a Function of Passage Variance in CBM Progress Monitoring”. School Psychology Review 33 (2), pp. 204–217.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Ittonen, K., E. Vähämaa, and S. Vähämaa (2013). “Female Auditors and Accruals Quality”. Accounting Horizons 27 (2), pp. 205–228.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Jenkins, S. (2007). “A Woman’s Work Is Never Done? Fund-Raising Perception and Effort among Female State Legislative Candidates”. Political Research Quarterly 60 (2), pp. 230– 239.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Johnson, M. and V. S. Helgeson (2002). “Sex Differences in Response to Evaluative Feedback: A Field Study”. Psychology of Women Quarterly 26 (3), pp. 242–251.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Editorial Board (2015). Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. http://journals.lww.com/jtrauma/Documents/Editorial%20Board%20Reports/ 2015%200909%20AAST%20Ed%20Board%20print%20report.pdf. Accessed: 2016-10-04.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Kimble, J. (1994). “Answering the Critics of Plain Language”. Scribes Journal of Legal Writing 51 (1994-1995), pp. 51–85.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. King, D. W., C. Tenopir, and M. Clarke (2006). “Measuring Total Reading of Journal Articles ”. D-Lib Magazine 12 (10), pp. 1082–9873.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Klos, D. M. (2014). The Status of Women in the U.S. Media 2013. Tech. rep. Women’s Media Center.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  87. Krawczyk, M. and M. Smyk (2016). “Author’s Gender Affects Rating of Academic Articles: Evidence from an Incentivized, Deception-free Laboratory Experiment”. European Economic Review 90, pp. 326–335.

  88. Kroll, B. (1990). “What Does Time Buy? ESL Student Performance on Home versus Class Compositions”. In: Second Language Writing. Ed. by B. Kroll. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Chap. 9, pp. 140–154.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  89. Kugler, A., C. Tinsley, and O. Ukhaneva (2017). “Choice of Majors: Are Women Really Different from Men?” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 23735.

  90. Lavy, V. and E. Sand (2015). “On The Origins of Gender Human Capital Gaps: Short and Long Term Consequences of Teachers’ Stereotypical Biases”. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 20909.

  91. Lee, C. J. (2016). “Revisiting Current Causes of Women’s Underrepresentation in Science”. In: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Ed. by M. Brownstein and J. Saul. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chap. 2.5, pp. 265–283.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Lehavy, R., F. Li, and K. Merkley (2011). “The Effect of Annual Report Readability on Analyst Following and the Properties of Their Earnings Forecasts”. Accounting Review 86 (3), pp. 1087–1115.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  93. Liang, F. M. (1983). “Word Hy-phen-a-tion by Com-put-er”. PhD thesis. Stanford University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Long, L. N. and W. F. Christensen (2011). “Does the Readability of Your Brief Affect Your Chance of Winning an Appeal?” Journal of Appellate Practice and Process 12 (1), pp. 1–14.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  95. Loughran, T. and B. McDonald (2014). “Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures”.

  96. McFadden, K. L. (1996). “Comparing Pilot-error Accident Rates of Male and Female Airline Pilots”. Omega 24 (4), pp. 443–450.

  97. Mohr, T. S. (2014). “Why Women Don’t Apply for Jobs Unless They’re 100% Qualified”.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  98. Moss-Racusin, C. A. et al. (2012). “Science Faculty’s Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (41), pp. 16474–16479.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  99. Neumark, D., R. J. Bank, and K. D. Van Nort (1996). “Sex Discrimination in Restaurant Hiring: An Audit Study”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (3), pp. 915–941.

  100. Niederle, M. and L. Vesterlund (2010). “Explaining the Gender Gap in Math Test Scores: The Role of Competition”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (2), pp. 129–144.

  101. Niskanen, J. et al. (2011). “Auditor Gender and Corporate Earnings Management Behavior in Private Finnish Firms”. Managerial Auditing Journal 26 (9), pp. 778–793.

  102. O’Donnell, E. and E. N. Johnson (2001). “The Effects of Auditor Gender and Task Complexity on Information Processing Efficiency”. International Journal of Auditing 5 (2), pp. 91–105.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  103. Paludi, M. A. and W. D. Bauer (1983). “Goldberg Revisited: What’s in an Author’s Name”. Sex Roles 9 (3), pp. 387–390.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  104. Parsons, C. A. et al. (2011). “Strike Three: Discrimination, Incentives, and Evaluation”.

  105. Payne, B. K. and D. Dabney (1997). “Prescription Fraud: Characteristics, Consequences, and Influences”. Journal of Drug Issues 27 (4), pp. 807–820.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  106. Pertold-Gebicka, B., F. Pertold, and N. D. Gupta (2016). “Employment Adjustments around Childbirth”. IZA Discussion Paper Series, No. 9685.

  107. Phelps, E. S. (1972). “The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism”. American Economic Review 62 (4), pp. 659–661.

  108. Powell-Smith, K. A. and K. L. Bradley-Klug (2001). “Another Look at the “C” in CBM: Does It Really Matter if Curriculum-based Measurement Reading Probes Are Curriculumbased ?” Psychology in the Schools 38 (4), pp. 299–312.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  109. Reuben, E., P. Sapienza, and L. Zingales (2014). “How Stereotypes Impair Women’s Careers in Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (12), pp. 4403–4408.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  110. Roberts, T.-A. and S. Nolen-Hoeksema (1989). “Sex Differences in Reactions to Evaluative Feedback”. Sex Roles 21 (11-12), pp. 725–747.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  111. Roter, D. L. and J. A. Hall (2004). “Physician Gender and Patient-centered Communication: A Critical Review of Empirical Research”. Annual Review of Public Health 25 (May), pp. 497–519.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  112. Salter, S. P. et al. (2012). “Broker Beauty and Boon: A Study of Physical Attractiveness and Its Effect on Real Estate Brokers’ Income and Productivity”. Applied Financial Economics 22 (February), pp. 811–825.

  113. Sarsons, H. (2016). “Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work”. Mimeo.

  114. Schafheutle, E. I., E. M. Seston, and K. Hassell (2011). “Factors Influencing Pharmacist Performance: A Review of the Peer-Reviewed Literature”. Health Policy 102 (2–3), pp. 178–192.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  115. Schmidt, B. (2015). “Gender Bias Exists in Professor Evaluations”. New York Times. http: //www .nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/12/16 /is- it- fair- to- rate- professorsonline /gender-bias-exists-in-professor-evaluations. Accessed: 2016-10-04.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  116. Seagraves, P. and P. Gallimore (2013). “The Gender Gap in Real Estate Sales: Negotiation Skill or Agent Selection?” Real Estate Economics 41 (3), pp. 600–631.

  117. Sheltzer, J. M. and J. C. Smith (2014). “Elite Male Faculty in the Life Sciences Employ Fewer Women”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (28), pp. 10107– 10112.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  118. Sirico, L. J. (2007). “Readability Studies: How Technocentrism Can Compromise Research and Legal Determinations”. Quinnipiac Law Review 26 (1), pp. 147–172.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  119. Stallard, C. K. (1974). “An Analysis of the Writing Behavior of Good Student Writers”. Research in the Teaching of English 8 (2), pp. 206–218.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  120. Szeinbach, S. et al. (2007). “Dispensing Errors in Community Pharmacy: Perceived Influence of Sociotechnical Factors”. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19 (4), pp. 203–209.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  121. Torgler, B. and M. Piatti (2013). A Century of American Economic Review. New York, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  122. Tsugawa, Y. et al. (2016). “Comparison of Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates for Medicare Patients Treated by Male vs. Female Physicians”. JAMA Internal Medicine 02138, pp. 1–8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  123. Turnbull, G. K. and J. Dombrow (2007). “Individual Agents, Firms, and the Real Estate Brokerage Process”. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 35 (1), pp. 57–76.

  124. Vail, G. J. and L. G. Ekman (1986). “Pilot-error Accidents: Male vs. Female”. Applied Ergonomics 17 (4), pp. 297–303.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  125. Van Rooyen, S. et al. (1999). “Effect of Open Peer Review on Quality of Reviews and on Reviewers ’ Recommendations: A Randomised Trial”. British Medical Journal 318 (7175), pp. 23–27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  126. Van Rooyen, S., T. Delamothe, and S. J. W. Evans (2010). “Effect on Peer Review of Telling Reviewers that Their Signed Reviews Might Be Posted on the Web: Randomised Controlled Trial”. British Medical Journal 341 (c5729).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  127. Voyer, D. and S. D. Voyer (2014). “Gender Differences in Scholastic Achievement: A MetaAnalysis ”. Psychological Bulletin 140 (4), pp. 1174–1204.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  128. Walsh, E. et al. (2000). “Open Peer Review: A Randomised Controlled Trial”. British Journal of Psychiatry 176 (1), pp. 47–51.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  129. Walton, R. O. and P. M. Politano (2016). “Characteristics of General Aviation Accidents Involving Male and Female Pilots”. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors 6 (1), pp. 39–44.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  130. Webb, T. J., B. O’Hara, and R. P. Freckleton (2008). “Does Double-blind Review Favor Female Authors?” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6 (7), pp. 351–353.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  131. Weisberg, Y. J., C. G. De Young, and J. B. Hirsh (2011). “Gender Differences in Personality Across the Ten Aspects of the Big Five”. Frontiers in Psychology 2 (1-11).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  132. Weisshaar, K. (2017). “Publish and Perish? An Assessment of Gender Gaps in Promotion to Tenure in Academia”. Social Forces (November), pp. 1–31.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  133. Whittaker, R. J. (2008). “Journal Review and Gender Equality: A Critical Comment on Budden et al.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23 (9), pp. 478–479.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  134. Williams, J. C., K. W. Phillips, and E. V. Hall (2015). Double Jeopardy? Gender Bias against Women of Color in Science. Tech. rep. University of California, Hastings College of the Law.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  135. Wu, A. H. (2017). “Gender Stereotyping in Academia: Evidence from Economics Job Market Rumors Forum”. Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  136. Xie, Y. and K. A. Shauman (2005). Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes. Cambridge, Massachussets: Harvard University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Male Gatekeepers: Gender Bias in the Publishing Process?. (2022). Kvasnicka, Michael ; Bransch, Felix.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:202:y:2022:i:c:p:714-732.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Innovative ideas and gender inequality. (2021). Koffi, Marlene.
    In: CLEF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:zbw:clefwp:35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Women in research in economics in Uruguay. (2021). Moraes, María Inés ; Bucheli, Marisa ; AMARANTE, VERONICA ; Perez, Tatiana.
    In: Documentos de Trabajo (working papers).
    RePEc:ulr:wpaper:dt-01-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Women in Research in Economics in Uruguay. (2021). AMARANTE, VERONICA ; Perez, Tatiana ; Moraes, Ines ; Bucheli, Marisa.
    In: Documentos de Trabajo (working papers).
    RePEc:ude:wpaper:0221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Scapegoating in evaluation decisions. (2021). Zussman, Asaf.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:186:y:2021:i:c:p:152-163.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Gender differences in the academic career of economics in Brazil. (2021). Borges, Bruna ; Narita, Renata ; Montoya, Maria Dolores ; Matsunaga, Liz ; Fabiana, Paula Pereda.
    In: Revista Cuadernos de Economía.
    RePEc:col:000093:020188.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Women in Research in Economics in Uruguay. (2021). Perez, Tatiana ; Moraes, Maria Ines ; Bucheli, Marisa ; Amarante, Veronica.
    In: Revista Cuadernos de Economía.
    RePEc:col:000093:020186.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Gender Gaps in the Evaluation of Research: Evidence from Submissions to Economics Conferences. (2021). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
    In: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics.
    RePEc:bla:obuest:v:83:y:2021:i:3:p:590-618.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Are women less persistent? Evidence from submissions to a nationwide meeting of Economics. (2020). Matsunaga, Diaz ; Pereda, Paula.
    In: Working Papers, Department of Economics.
    RePEc:spa:wpaper:2020wpecon19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?. (2019). Iriberri, Nagore ; Funk, Patricia ; DellaVigna, Stefano ; Card, David.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25967.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Variation in Women’s Success Across PhD Programs in Economics. (2019). Langan, Andrew ; Boustan, Leah.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25444.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Gender Gaps in the Evaluation of Research: Evidence from Submissions to Economics Conferences. (2019). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12494.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?. (2019). Iriberri, Nagore ; Funk, Patricia ; Dellavigna, Stefano ; Della Vigna, Stefano ; Card, David.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:13789.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Gender gaps in the evaluation of research: evidence from submissions to economics conferences. (2019). Sanz, Carlos ; Hospido, Laura.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bde:wpaper:1918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Gender Quotas in Hiring Committees: a Boon or a Bane for Women?. (2018). Deschamps, Pierre.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/7bucmgmilh9ul9ogmiku5legh5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Gender Quotas in Hiring Committees: a Boon or a Bane for Women?. (2018). Deschamps, Pierre.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03393117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Gender Quotas in Hiring Committees: a Boon or a Bane for Women?. (2018). Deschamps, Pierre.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03393117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations. (2018). Zölitz, Ulf ; Sauermann, Jan ; Zolitz, Ulf ; Mengel, Friederike.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Gender bias in teaching evaluations. (2017). Zölitz, Ulf ; Sauermann, Jan ; Mengel, Friederike ; Zolitz, Ulf Zoelitz.
    In: ROA Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umaror:2017007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Promotions and Earnings – Gender or Merit? Evidence from Longitudinal Personnel Data. (2017). Pehkonen, Jaakko ; Jokinen, Juho.
    In: Journal of Labor Research.
    RePEc:spr:jlabre:v:38:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s12122-017-9254-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Gender quotas or girls networks? Towards an understanding of recruitment in the research profession in Italy. (2017). Cicognani, Simona ; Checchi, Daniele ; Kulic, Nevena .
    In: Working Paper series.
    RePEc:rim:rimwps:17-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Male Gatekeepers Gender Bias in the Publishing Process?. (2017). Kvasnicka, Michael ; Bransch, Felix.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11089.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations. (2017). Zölitz, Ulf ; Sauermann, Jan ; Mengel, Friederike ; Zolitz, Ulf.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11000.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Tourism’s lost leaders: Analysing gender and performance. (2017). Pritchard, Annette ; Morgan, Nigel.
    In: Annals of Tourism Research.
    RePEc:eee:anture:v:63:y:2017:i:c:p:34-47.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Publishing while Female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review.. (2017). Hengel, Erin.
    In: Cambridge Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cam:camdae:1753.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?. (2017). Zinovyeva, Natalia ; Sylos-Labini, Mauro ; Bagues, Manuel.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:107:y:2017:i:4:p:1207-38.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Field Experiments on Discrimination. (2016). Duflo, Esther ; Bertrand, Marianne.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:22014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime. (2016). Do, Quoc-Anh ; Tran, Anh ; Nguyen, Kieu-Trang.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Field Experiments on Discrimination. (2016). Bertrand, Marianne ; Duflo, Esther.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11123.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime. (2016). Do, Quoc-Anh ; Tran, Anh N ; Nguyen, Kieu-Trang.
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1409.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Age, Cohort and Co-Authorship. (2015). Hamermesh, Daniel.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:20938.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?. (2015). Zinovyeva, Natalia ; Sylos-Labini, Mauro ; Bagues, Manuel.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp9199.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Age, Cohort and Co-Authorship. (2015). Hamermesh, Daniel.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp8828.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Endophilia or Exophobia: Beyond Discrimination. (2015). Salamanca, Nicolas ; Hamermesh, Daniel ; Feld, Jan.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0593.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Gender quotas or girls networks? Towards an understanding of recruitment in the research profession in Italy. (2015). Cicognani, Simona ; Checchi, Daniele ; Kulic, Nevena .
    In: FBK-IRVAPP Working Papers.
    RePEc:fbk:wpaper:2015-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Gender quotas or girls’ networks? Towards an understanding of recruitment in the research profession in Italy. (2015). Cicognani, Simona ; Checchi, Daniele ; Kulic, N.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bol:bodewp:wp1047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Do gender quotas pass the test ? Evidence from academic evaluations in Italy. (2014). Zinovyeva, Natalia ; Sylos-Labini, Mauro ; Bagues, Manuel.
    In: LEM Papers Series.
    RePEc:ssa:lemwps:2014/14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Endophilia or exophobia: beyond discrimination. (2013). Salamanca, Nicolas ; Hamermesh, Daniel ; Feld, Jan ; Feld J. F., ; Salamanca Acosta N., ; Hamermesh D., .
    In: ROA Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umaror:2013008.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Endophilia or exophobia: beyond discrimination. (2013). Salamanca, Nicolas ; Hamermesh, Daniel ; Feld, Jan ; Feld J. F., ; Salamanca Acosta N., ; Hamermesh D., .
    In: Research Memorandum.
    RePEc:unm:umagsb:2013026.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime. (2013). Do, Quoc-Anh ; Tran, Anh N. ; Nguyen, Kieu-Trang.
    In: Sciences Po publications.
    RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6ggbvnr6munghes9ocpp7f52o.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime. (2013). Tran, Anh N. ; Do, Quoc-Anh ; Nguyen, Kieu-Trang.
    In: Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/6ggbvnr6munghes9ocpp7f52o.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Endophilia or Exophobia: Beyond Discrimination. (2013). Salamanca, Nicolas ; Hamermesh, Daniel ; Feld, Jan.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19471.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Endophilia or Exophobia: Beyond Discrimination. (2013). Salamanca, Nicolas ; Hamermesh, Daniel ; Feld, Jan.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp7380.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime. (2013). Tran, Anh ; Nguyen, Kieu-Trang ; Do, Quoc-Anh.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03460977.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. How well do urban growth boundaries contain development? Results for Oregon using a difference-in-difference estimator. (2013). Plantinga, Andrew J. ; Dempsey, Judith A..
    In: Regional Science and Urban Economics.
    RePEc:eee:regeco:v:43:y:2013:i:6:p:996-1007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Gender complementarities in the labor market. (2013). Pellizzari, Michele ; Paccagnella, Marco ; De Giorgi, Giacomo ; DeGiorgi, Giacomo .
    In: Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers).
    RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_183_13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-25 20:47:46 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.