Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Male principal investigators (almost) don’t publish with women in ecology and zoology. (2019). Stynoski, Jennifer L ; Guayasamin, Juan M ; Paez-Vacas, Monica ; Salerno, Patricia E.
In: PLOS ONE.
RePEc:plo:pone00:0218598.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 3

Citations received by this document

Cites: 52

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Temporal trends in academic performance and career duration of principal investigators in ecology and evolutionary biology in Taiwan. (2023). Sun, Syuan-Jyun ; Lin, Wei-Jiun ; Hsu, Gen-Chang.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04710-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Collaborations in communication: Authorship credit allocation via a weighted fractional count procedure. (2021). Arth, Zachary W ; Griffin, Darrin J ; Bolkan, San ; Hart, Sage ; Bordbar, Fareed ; Laningham, Andrew J ; Pike, Mackenzie P ; Gilbreath, James N ; Britt, Brian C ; Hakim, Samuel D.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-021-03927-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Unconscious Gender Bias in Academia: Scarcity of Empirical Evidence. (2020). Skov, Torsten .
    In: Societies.
    RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:31-:d:338741.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Ballen CJ, Salehi A, Cotner S. Exams disadvantage women in introductory biology. PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0186419. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186419 PMID: 29049334
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Beasley MA, Fischer MJ. Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors. Soc Psychol Educ. 2012; 15:427–448.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Ben-Zeev AB, Paluy Y, Milless KL, Goldstein EJ, Wallace L, Márquez-Magaña L, et al. ’Speaking truth’ protects underrepresented minorities’ intellectual performance and safety in STEM. Educ Sci. 2017; 7:65. Male lead ecologists publish with few women PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218598 June 19, 2019 13 / 55. Ballen CJ, Wieman C, Salehi S, Searle JB, Zamudio KR. Enhancing diversity in undergraduate science: Self-efficacy drives performance gains with active learning. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017; 16:ar56. https:// doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-12-0344 PMID: 29054921
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Bonham KS, Stefan MI. Women are underrepresented in computational biology: An analysis of the scholarly literature in biology, computer science, and computational biology. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017; 13:e1005134. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005134 PMID: 29023441 Male lead ecologists publish with few women PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218598 June 19, 2019 11 / 6. Damschen EI, Resenfeld KM, Wyer M, Murphy-Medley D, Wentworth TR, Haddad NM. Visibility matters: Increasing knowledge of women’s contributions to ecology. Front Ecol Environ. 2005; 3:212–219.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Budden AE, Tregenza T, Aarssen LW, Koricheva J, Leimu R, Lortie CJ. Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends Ecol Evol.2008; 23:4–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tree.2007.07.008 PMID: 17963996
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Campbell LG, Mehtani S, Dozier ME, Rinehart J. Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e79147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079147 PMID: 24205372
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Ceci SJ, Ginther DK, Kahn S, Williams WM. Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014; 15:75–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614541236 PMID:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Cheryan S, Plaut VC, Davies PG, Steele CM. Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. J Pers Soc Psychol.2009; 97:1045–1060. https://doi.org/10. 1037/a0016239 PMID: 19968418
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Clancy KBH, Nelson RG, Rutherford JN, Hinde K. Survey of academic field experiences (SAFE): Trainees report harassment and assault. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e102172. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0102172 PMID: 25028932

  10. Costas R, Bordons M. Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications ? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective. Scientometrics 2011; 88:145–161. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-011-0368-z PMID: 21765565 Male lead ecologists publish with few women PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218598 June 19, 2019 12 / 31. Duch J, Zeng XHT, Sales-Pardo M, RAdicchi F, Otis S, Woodruff TK, Amaral LAN. The possible role of resource requirements and academic career-choice risk on gender differences in publication rate and impact. PLoS ONE 2012; 7:12:e51332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051332 PMID: 23251502

  11. Downing RA, Crosby FJ, Blake-Beard S. The perceived importance of developmental relationships on women undergraduates’ pursuit of science. Psychol Women Q. 2005; 29:419–426.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Drury BJ, Siy JO, Cheryan S. When do female role models benefit women? The importance of differentiating retention in STEM. Psychological Inquiry. 2011; 22:265–269.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Duffy MA. Last and corresponding authorship practices in ecology. Ecol Evol. 2017; 7:8876–8887. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3435 PMID: 29152184
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Espin J, Palmas S, Carrasco-Rueda F, Riemer K, Allen PE, Berkebile N, et al. A persistent lack of international representation on editorial boards in environmental biology. PLoS Biol. 2017; 15:e2002760. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002760 PMID: 29232375
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Evans TM, Bira L, Gastelum JB, Weiss TL, Vanderford NL. Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education. Nat Biotechnol. 2018; 36:282–284. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4089 PMID: 29509732 Male lead ecologists publish with few women PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218598 June 19, 2019 14 /
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Farr CM, Bombaci SP, Gallo T, Manan AM, Riedl HL, Stinson LT, et al. Addressing the gender gap in distinguished speakers and professional ecology conferences. BioScience. 2017; 67:464–468.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Fox CW, Paine CET. Citations increase with manuscript length, author number, and references cited in ecology journals. Ecology and Evolution 2016; 6:7717–7726. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2505 PMID:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Fox CW, Ritchey JP, Paine CET. Patterns of authorship in ecology and evolution: First, last, and corresponding authorship vary with gender and geography. Ecology and Evolution 2018; https://doi.org/10. 1002/ece3.4584
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Grogan KE. How the entire scientific community can confront gender bias in the workplace. Nature Ecology and Evolution 26 Nov 2018; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0747-4
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Grunspan DZ, Eddy SL, Brownell SE, Wiggins BL, Crowe AJ, Goodreau SM. Males underestimate academic performance of their female peers in undergraduate biology classrooms. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0148405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148405 PMID: 26863320
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Guzmán-Valenzuela C. Global trends and their impact on Latin America: The role of the state and the private sector in the provision of higher education. Centre for Global Higher Education. 2016; 4. Available from: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/sites/default/files/breaking_news_files/globaltrends -and-their-impact-on-latin-america.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Handley IM, Brown ER, Moss-Racusin CA, Smith JL. Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112:13201–13206.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  23. Hengel E. Publishing while female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. Cambridge Working Paper Economics.2017; 1753:1–76. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.17548

  24. Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Jones R, Perumalswami CR, Ubel P, Stewart A. Sexual harassment and discrimination experiences of academic medical faculty. J Am Med Assoc.2016; 315:2120–2121.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  25. Kaplan K. Self-doubt plagues female astronomers. Nature. 2010; 463:574.

  26. Krook ML, Zetterberg P. Gender Quotas and Women’s Representation: New Directions in Research. Oxon, UK: Routledge; 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Lariviere V, Desrochers N, Macaluso B, Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A, Sugimoto CR. Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science 2016; 46: 3:417–435. https://doi. org/10.1177/0306312716650046 PMID: 28948891
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Lariviere V, Ni C, Gingras Y, Cronin B, Sugimoto CR. Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature 2013; 504:211–213. PMID: 24350369

  29. Ley TJ, Hamilton BH. The gender gap in NIH applications. Science 2008; 322:1472–1474. https://doi. org/10.1126/science.1165878 PMID: 19056961
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Lockwood P. Someone like me can be successful: Do college students need same-gender role models ? Psychol Women Q. 2006; 30:36–46.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Lubienski ST, Miller EK, Saclarides ES. Sex differences in doctoral student publication rates. Educ Res. 2017; 47:76–81.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. MacNell L, Driscoll A, Hunt AN. What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innov High Educ. 2014; 40:291–303.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Manlove KR, Belou RM. Authors and editors assort on gender and geography in high-rank ecological publications. PLoS ONE 2018; 13:2:e0192481. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192481 PMID:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Martin LJ. Where are the women in ecology? Front Ecol Environ. 2012; 10:177–178.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Martinez ED, Botos J, Dohoney KM, Geiman TM, Kolla SS, Olivera A, et al. Falling off the academic bandwagon: Women are more likely to quit at the postdoc to principal investigator transition. EMBO Rep. 2007; 8:977–981. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7401110 PMID: 17972894
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. McGuire KL, Primack RB, Losos EC. Dramatic improvements and persistent challenges for women ecologists. BioScience. 2012; 62:189–196.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Monroe K, Ozyurt S, Wrigley T, Alexander A. Gender equality in academia: Bad news from the trenches, and some possible solutions. Perspectives on Politics. 2008; 6:215–233.2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Monroe K. Tougher standards for female scholars? The psychology behind them and policies to eliminate them. International Studies Perspectives. 2013; 14:476–484.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109:16474–16479.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Pell AN. Fixing the leaky pipeline: Women scientists in academia. J Anim Sci. 1996; 74:2843–2848. https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.74112843x PMID: 8923199
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2015. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Rossiter MW. The Mathew Matilda effect in science. Soc Stud Sci. 1993; 23:325–341.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Seymour E, Hunter AB, Laursen SL, DeAntoni T. Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Sci Educ.2004; 88:493–534.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Sidhu R, Rajashekhar P, Lavin VL, Parry J, Attwood J, Holdcroft A, Sanders DS. The gender imbalance in academic medicine: A study of female authorship in the United Kingdom. J R Soc Med. 2009; 102:337–342. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2009.080378 PMID: 19679736
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Spencer SJ, Steele CM, Quinn DM. Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1999; 35:4–28.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Steele CM. A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Am Psychol. 1997; 52:613–629. PMID: 9174398
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  47. Sugimoto CR, Ni C, Lariviere V. On the relationship between gender disparities in scholarly communication and country-level development indicators. Science and Public Policy 2015; 42:6:789–810.

  48. Tscharntke T, Hochberg ME, Rand TA, Resh VH, Krauss J. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biol. 2007; 5:e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio. 0050018 PMID: 17227141

  49. Valentova JV, Otta E, Silva ML, McElligott AG. Underrepresentation of women in the senior levels of Brazilian science. PeerJ. 2017; 5:e4000 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4000 PMID: 29302384
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Weeden KA, Thébaud S, Gelbgiser D. Degrees of difference: Gender segregation of US doctorates by field and program prestige. Sociol Sci.2017; 4:123–150.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  51. West JD, Jacquet J, King MM, Correll SJ, Bergstrom CT. The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e66212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066212 PMID: 23894278

  52. Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science. 2010; 330:686–688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 1193147 PMID: 20929725
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Authorship regulations in performance-based funding systems and publication behaviour – A case study of German medical faculties. (2024). van den Besselaar, Peter ; Aman, Valeria.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:18:y:2024:i:2:s1751157724000130.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Gender disparities in accounting academia: analysis from the lens of publications. (2023). Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria ; Rivera-Ordoez, Juan-Camilo ; Uribe-Bohorquez, Maria-Victoria.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04718-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Author contributions and allocation of authorship credit: testing the validity of different counting methods in the field of chemical biology. (2023). Sundling, Par.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04680-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Exploring the clinical translation intensity of papers published by the world’s top scientists in basic medicine. (2023). Liu, Chunli ; Zang, Dongyu.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04634-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Authorship order as an indicator of similarity between article discourse and author citation identity in informetrics. (2023). Cabrini, Maria Claudia ; Hilario, Carla Mara ; Wolfram, Dietmar ; Martinez-Avila, Daniel.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:10:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04791-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Bias against parents in science hits women harder. (2023). Mello-Carpes, Pamela B ; Zandona, Eugenia ; Reichert, Fernanda ; Soletti, Rossana C ; Machado, Arthur V ; Staniscuaski, Fernanda ; Oliveira, Leticia ; Infanger, Camila.
    In: Palgrave Communications.
    RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01722-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Attracting and retaining women in forest entomology and forest pathology. (2023). Darr, Molly N ; Ganley, Rebecca J ; Marzano, Mariella ; Klapwijk, Maartje J ; Brockerhoff, Eckehard G ; Hartshorn, Jessica A.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:154:y:2023:i:c:s138993412300117x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Scientific Contribution List Categories Investigation: a comparison between three mainstream medical journals. (2022). Storopoli, Jose Eduardo ; Souza, Edson Melo ; Luz, Wonder Alexandre.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04315-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Author placement in Computer Science: a study based on the careers of ACM Fellows. (2022). Costa, Antonio ; Fernandes, Joo M ; Cortez, Paulo.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04035-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Studying the characteristics of scientific communities using individual-level bibliometrics: the case of Big Data research. (2021). Costas, Rodrigo ; Lyu, Xiaozan.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:8:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04034-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Ten simple rules for productive lab meetings. (2021). Morelli, Toni Lyn ; Hallworth, Michael T ; Drake, Joseph ; Balantic, Cathleen ; Devarajan, Kadambari ; Golden, Nigel.
    In: PLOS Computational Biology.
    RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008953.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Precarious employment and self-reported experiences of unwanted sexual attention and sexual harassment at work. An analysis of the European Working Conditions Survey. (2020). Dragano, Nico ; Iavicoli, Sergio ; Barbaranelli, Claudio ; Ritz-Timme, Stefanie ; Chirumbolo, Antonio ; Probst, Tahira M ; di Tecco, Cristina ; Wahrendorf, Morten ; Reuter, Marvin.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0233683.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Sexual harassment in academe is underreported, especially by students in the life and physical sciences. (2020). Baek, Clare ; Aguilar, Stephen J.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0230312.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Knowledge recency to the birth of Nobel Prize-winning articles: Gender, career stage, and country. (2020). Hu, Zhigang ; Ding, Ying ; Hou, Haiyan ; Liang, Guoqiang.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:14:y:2020:i:3:s1751157719301804.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Predicting the research performance of early career scientists. (2019). Lee, Danielle H.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:121:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03232-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Male principal investigators (almost) don’t publish with women in ecology and zoology. (2019). Stynoski, Jennifer L ; Guayasamin, Juan M ; Paez-Vacas, Monica ; Salerno, Patricia E.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0218598.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Unpaid work and access to science professions. (2019). Leighton, Margaret ; Bond, Alexander L ; Holford, Angus J.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0217032.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. “Antarctica just has this hero factor…”: Gendered barriers to Australian Antarctic research and remote fieldwork. (2019). Bax, Narissa ; Lea, Mary-Anne ; King, Matt ; Shaw, Justine ; Nash, Meredith.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0209983.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Measuring dissatisfaction with coauthorship: An empirical approach based on the researchers’ perception. (2019). Gomez-Ferri, Javier ; Llopis-Goig, Ramon ; Gonzalez-Alcaide, Gregorio.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:13:y:2019:i:4:s1751157719301336.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Researchers’ risk-smoothing publication strategies: Is productivity the enemy of impact?. (2018). Fukumoto, Eriko ; Kolesnikov, Sergey ; Bozeman, Barry.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:116:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2793-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Inequality and collaboration patterns in Canadian nanotechnology: implications for pro-poor and gender-inclusive policy. (2018). Harsh, Matthew ; Ghiasi, Gita ; Schiffauerova, Andrea.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:115:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2701-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Family and the field: Expectations of a field-based research career affect researcher family planning decisions. (2018). Stein, Max J ; Howells, Michaela E ; Lynn, Christopher D.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0203500.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Chilly Climates, Balancing Acts, and Shifting Pathways: What Happens to Women in STEM Doctoral Programs. (2018). Rivers, Melissa ; Bernstein, Bianca L ; Cabay, Marilyn ; Fabert, Natalie.
    In: Social Sciences.
    RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:23-:d:129593.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. The relationship between the author byline and contribution lists: a comparison of three general medical journals. (2017). Wang, Feifei ; Yang, Siluo ; Wolfram, Dietmar.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:110:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2239-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Men ask more questions than women at a scientific conference. (2017). Johnston, Alison ; Sutherland, William J ; Hinsley, Amy.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0185534.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Ten Simple Rules on How to Organize a Scientific Retreat. (2017). Guigo, Roderic ; Garrido, Romina ; Ponomarenko, Julia.
    In: PLOS Computational Biology.
    RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005344.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Predicting the age of researchers using bibliometric data. (2017). Nane, Gabriela F ; Costas, Rodrigo ; Lariviere, Vincent.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:11:y:2017:i:3:p:713-729.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Researchers’ career transitions over the life cycle. (2016). Kondo, Ayako ; Kawaguchi, Daiji ; Saito, Keiji.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:109:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2131-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Importance and susceptibility of scientific productivity indicators: two sides of the same coin. (2016). Oliveira, Alexandre Rodrigues ; Mello, Carlos Fernando .
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:109:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2047-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Research trend of metal–organic frameworks: a bibliometric analysis. (2016). Wang, Chong-Chen ; Ho, Yuh-Shan.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:109:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-016-1986-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Researchers Career Transitions over the Life Cycle. (2016). Kondo, Ayako ; Kawaguchi, Daiji ; Saito, Keiji .
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp10080.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Drafting an Effective Ethical Code of Conduct for Professional Societies: A Practical Guide. (2016). Hardy, Margaret C.
    In: Administrative Sciences.
    RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:6:y:2016:i:4:p:16-:d:83607.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. A bibliometric analysis of research papers related to the Mekong River. (2015). Chen, Yongxia ; Sui, Xiaoyun ; Lu, Zhi.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:105:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1683-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. The research activity of the current faculty of the Greek chemical engineering departments: a bibliometric study in national and international context. (2015). Kazakis, Nikolaos A.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:103:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1523-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Medical theses and derivative articles: dissemination of contents and publication patterns. (2015). Stuart, David ; Echeverria, Mercedes ; Blanke, Tobias.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1442-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity. (2015). Lariviere, Vincent ; Costas, Rodrigo ; Fanelli, Daniele.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0127556.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Unravelling the performance of individual scholars: Use of Canonical Biplot analysis to explore the performance of scientists by academic rank and scientific field. (2015). Diaz-Faes, Adrian A ; Bordons, Maria ; Galindo, Purificacion M ; Costas, Rodrigo.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:9:y:2015:i:4:p:722-733.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Gender differences in scientific performance: A bibliometric matching analysis of Danish health sciences Graduates. (2015). Frandsen, Tove Faber ; Ousager, Jakob ; Brixen, Kim ; Wallin, Johan A ; Jacobsen, Rasmus Hojbjerg .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:9:y:2015:i:4:p:1007-1017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Scientific group leaders’ authorship preferences: an empirical investigation. (2014). Liu, Xuanzhen ; Fang, Hui.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:98:y:2014:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1083-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Evaluating the research performance of the Greek medical schools using bibliometrics. (2014). Diamantidis, Anastasios D ; Kazakis, Nikolaos A ; Lazarides, Miltos K ; Fragidis, Leonidas L.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:98:y:2014:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1049-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Classic articles on social work field in Social Science Citation Index: a bibliometric analysis. (2014). Ho, Yuh-Shan.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:98:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-013-1014-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Determinants of success for biomedical researchers: a perception-based study in a health science research environment. (2014). Lopez-Navarro, Irene ; Antonio-Garcia, Teresa M ; Rey-Rocha, Jesus.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:101:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1376-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Bibliometric evaluation of the research performance of the Greek civil engineering departments in National and European context. (2014). Kazakis, Nikolaos A.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:101:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1326-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. A network-based approach to coauthorship credit allocation. (2014). Kim, Jinseok ; Diesner, Jana.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:101:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1253-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Perceptions of author order versus contribution among researchers with different professional ranks and the potential of harmonic counts for encouraging ethical co-authorship practices. (2013). Xiaoli, Tang ; Jian, DU.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:96:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0905-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. The top-cited research works in the Science Citation Index Expanded. (2013). Ho, Yuh-Shan.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:94:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0837-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Alphabetization and the skewing of first authorship towards last names early in the alphabet. (2013). Levitt, Jonathan M. ; Thelwall, Mike.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:7:y:2013:i:3:p:575-582.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980–2011. (2013). Fu, Hui-Zhen ; Ho, Yuh-Shan .
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:7:y:2013:i:1:p:210-222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing. (2012). Waltman, Ludo.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:6:y:2012:i:4:p:700-711.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-13 14:50:29 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.