Wikipedia:Requests for checkusership/BRPever

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful permissions request. Please do not modify it.

• Result: Successful (26/0). Posted to m:SRP. --Ferien (talk) 19:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BRPever (talk · contribs · count)

End date: 06:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello everyone. I am here requesting checkusership since both Operator873 and Peterdownunder said that they would like to step down. Recently, I have had more time to be active and my activity will be constantly increasing as we move to 2025. I used to be a CU at wikidata so I am familiar with the tools, it's uses, and especially about what not to do as a CU. I am also a former steward and have actively used these tools during my time. I am familiar with the privacy policy and have necessary technical knowledge to handle the tools. If help is needed from CUs from other wikis, I am aware of how and whom I should reach. I would like to primarily handle the requests on WP:RFCU and try making things a bit easier to process. Thank you for your consideration.--BRP ^ever 06:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: self-nomination

1. Support. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2. Strong support Unfortunately, I do plan to retire my CheckUsership imminently. I could not think of a better person to step up. Operator873 ^connect 06:21, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
3. strong support your experience makes you an ideal candidate. fr33kman 18:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
4. I support--Tsugaru let's talk! :) 20:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
5. Support Plenty of experience and a great candidate. Aster🪻 ^{talk edits} 20:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
6. Support--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 23:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
7. Support - thetree284 (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
8. Support Lots of experience related to the role, active and trusted. A no brainer --Ferien (talk) 00:21, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
9. Support Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 01:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
10. Support TyphoonAmpil (talk) 05:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
11. Support - Peterdownunder (talk) 21:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
12. Support — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 23:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
13. Strong support - Experienced and trusted admin, I see no red flags here. Easy support. –Davey2010^Talk 13:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
14. Support --M7 (talk) 11:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
15. Strong support I trust BRPever to be a really good CU. Contributor^118,784 Let's talk 15:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
16. Support definitely! Ternera (talk) 15:53, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
17. Support Active admin, definitely Check-User material.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
18. Support, quick enough to vote before it closes. ToadetteEdit (talk) 16:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
19. Strong support BZPN (talk) 09:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
20. Support I trust this user with the tools. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
21. Support --Krd (talk) 14:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
22. Support MathXplore (talk) 14:23, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
23. Support i always supported and trusted you Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 16:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
24. Support no reason not to be happy with this. User is responsible and can be trusted. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
25. Support --Eptalon (talk) 09:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
26. Support – OrangKalideres (talk) 12:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.