Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

US3853059A - Configured blast fragmentation warhead - Google Patents

Configured blast fragmentation warhead Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3853059A
US3853059A US00105739A US10573971A US3853059A US 3853059 A US3853059 A US 3853059A US 00105739 A US00105739 A US 00105739A US 10573971 A US10573971 A US 10573971A US 3853059 A US3853059 A US 3853059A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
warhead
layers
fragmentation
initiation
fragment
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US00105739A
Inventor
R Moe
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
US Department of Navy
Original Assignee
US Department of Navy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by US Department of Navy filed Critical US Department of Navy
Priority to US00105739A priority Critical patent/US3853059A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3853059A publication Critical patent/US3853059A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H11/00—Defence installations; Defence devices
    • F41H11/02—Anti-aircraft or anti-guided missile or anti-torpedo defence installations or systems
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
    • F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
    • F42B12/20—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type
    • F42B12/201—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type characterised by target class
    • F42B12/205—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type characterised by target class for attacking aerial targets
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
    • F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
    • F42B12/20—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type
    • F42B12/22—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type with fragmentation-hull construction
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S102/00—Ammunition and explosives
    • Y10S102/701—Charge wave forming

Definitions

  • Prior fragmentation warheads have generally been initiated from a single, axially located, detonator. Such prior warheads were suitable, for example, in antipersonnel devices or the like where a pattern of widely scattered fragments was desirable.
  • An air to ground missile warhead has been developed having a fragmentation pattern directed in accordance with a predetermined charge to metal ratio and designed for use against ground installations.
  • One such warhead is described in assignees US. Pat. No. 3,498,224, issued Mar. 3, 1970. In air-to-air devices, however, it has been found that a more concentrated beam of fragments gives a much greater possibility of structural damage to the target.
  • a configured blast fragmentation (CBF) warhead and a method which causes the fragments to focus into an isotropic annular disk upon multipoint double end initiation or in a forward or aft conical disk when initiated on either end respectively.
  • a shift of the fragment beam spray can be obtained by selective initiation of either end of the warhead, thus increasing the lethal interval of the warhead along the missile trajectory.
  • selective initiation may be accomplished with the aid of available missle intelligence through a simple logic switching network.
  • The'basic warhead initiation scheme is double ended
  • simultaneous, multipoint initiation This causes the fragments to focus into an isotropic annular disk with the width of the disk being approximately equal to the original length of the warhead.
  • the successful use of this concept involves optimizing the energy content of the warhead/fragment systent.
  • the basic philosophy is to optimize the initial available explosive energy (on an MV basis, for example) and effect the most efficient transfer of this energy into high velocity fragments.
  • FIG. 1 is a graphic illustration of the basic concept of the invention
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective view partly in section showing a first embodiment of a warhead according to the invention
  • FIG. 3a is a longitudinal cross sectional view of a sec- 0nd embodiment
  • FIG. 1 of the drawing it may be seen that when a warhead manufactured according to the present invention is initiated at the after end, a forwardly directed conical fragment pattern is achieved as shown at (A). A similar directional fragment pattern is directed aft when the warhead is initiated at the forward end as shown at (C).
  • the fragment beam tends to converge on a peripheral line that is at a radius from the warhead corresponding to the design radius for the particular configuration used.
  • Many missiles, at present have available information in the guidance circuitry which is sufficient to provide controls to selectively initiate detonation in an optimum mode based on some combination of missile and target attitude, proximity, etc.
  • the warhead 10, shown in FIG. 2, is encased in a shroud 12 and filled with a high explosive 14.
  • shroud 12 Just inside of shroud 12 is a full length fragmentation layer 16 having a second fragment layer 18 fore and aft.
  • a conventional safe and arm device 29 fills about half of the central cavity 20 and carries a booster 22 in most applications.
  • Detonators 24 are placed in a plurality of locations spaced around the end plates 30, 30' and are connected to the booster 22 by means of detonation trains 26.
  • the two end pieces 32, 32 are made integral with the shroud l2 and are configured to connect to other portions of a missile shroud by being provided with grooves or threads 28, 28 and necessary holes 33. Both fragment layers are scored on the inner surface in a grid pattern as shown at 19.
  • the warhead 100 shown in FIG. 3a is similar in most respects to the warhead 10 of FIG. 2.
  • the fragment layer 116 is tapered from the center toward each end with a void space between the fragment layer 116 and shroud 112.
  • Items in FIGS. 3a and 3b which are the same or similar to comparable items in FIG. 2 are designated by the same number increased by 100.
  • the shroud in FIG. 3a is 112
  • the'explosive material 114, etc. and the FIG. 4 device uses the same numbers in the 200 series.
  • the warhead 200 in the FIG. 4 version has the void space between the outer fragment layer 216 and shroud 212 filled with an inert material 204 which contributes to the warheads bullet resistance, shock resistance, heat resistance, etc.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates still another configuration of the fragment layers, similar to that in FIG. 4 but with the layers 316, 318 being straight.
  • FIGS. 6 and 7 illustrate how the booster or firing device is attached to the safe and arm device 29.
  • the booster devices vary in configuration depending on the desired firing pattern.
  • the booster shown in cross section in FIG. 8 will fire in a peripheral manner to ignite all of the detonation trains 26 (or 126, 226) simultaneously, thus causing multipoint double end initiation of the main explosive charge.
  • An optimum utilization of the CBF warhead concept should utilize a fragment size and shape which produces the maximum target response.
  • the optimum convergent fragment beam would converge on a peripheral line that is at a radius from the warhead corresponding to the maximum catastrophic kill radius of the warhead design.
  • the CBF designs tested thus far exhibit the largest catastrophic kill radius for a given weight limited warhead system.
  • a shift of the fragment beam spray (and a deemphasis of the fragment focusssing effect) can be obtained by selective initiation of either end of the warhead. This is useful in increasing the warheads lethal interval along the missile trajectory but requires the availability of certain missile intelligence and a simple logic switching and selectable initiation network.
  • the CBF fragment lead angle can be altered by tapering the fragment wall to cause the fragments to converge on a peripheral line other than the focus point or line that would be produced by a cylindrical fragment wall. This also reduces the fragment velocity gradient and concentrates the fragmentation effects on a high velocity target.
  • the ABF warhead configuration that is considered most promising is a cylindrical warhead utilizing double end, simultaneous initiation of multipoint boosters.
  • the multi-walled, tapered cylindrical mild steel fragmenting case utilizes an inner surface grid system which controls the fragment size and shape. This fragment size and shape efficiently couples with the aerial targets, within the threat spectrum, to produce a high percentage of catastrophic structural kills.
  • the explosive material is selected on a maximum energy basis with consideration given to bullet impact and open flame cook-off sensitivity.
  • detonation initiation means centrally located in said warhead a plurality of detonation boosters spaced around each end of said warhead; and detonation transfer means connecting said intiation menas and said booster means;
  • the warhead may be selectively detonated at a plurality of points at either end or both ends or detonated centrally.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

A warhead for a guided missile or the like is provided with selectively operable multiple initiation devices, encased in a contoured fragmentation casing designed to optimize the initial available explosive energy to effect the most efficient transfer of energy into high velocity fragments. A shift of the fragment beam spray can be obtained by selective initiation of either end of the warhead or simultaneous initiation at both ends.

Description

ilited States Eatent Moe Dec. 10, 197
[54] CONFIGURED BLAST FRAGMENTATION 3,136,251 6/1964 Witow 102/67 WARHEAD 3,447,463 6/1969 Lavine 4 l02/67 3,490,374 1/1970 Nooker i. 102/67 [75] Inventor: Richard G. Moe, China Lake, Calif. [73] Assignee: The United States of America as Primary Examiner Pendegrass represented b the secretary f the Attorney, Agent, or FirmR. S. Sciascia; Roy Miller; Navy, Washington, DC. Gerald Baker [22] Filed: Jan. 11, 1971 [57] ABSTRACT [21] Appl 105739 A warhead for a guided missile or the like is provided with selectively operable multiple initiation devices, 52 US. (:1. 102/67, IOZ/DIG. 2 encased in a contoured fragmentation casing designed [51] Int. Cl. F42!) 13/48 to Optimize the iniiial available explosive energy to [58] Field of Search... 102/64, 67 fect the most efficiem transfer of energy into high locity fragments. A shift of the fragment beam spray 5 References Cited can be obtained by selective initiation of either end of UNITED STATES PATENTS Steinmetz 102/64 the warhead or simultaneous initiation at both ends.
8 Claims, 9 Drawing Figures I A. WARHEAD INITIATION AT AFT END mamm 3.853.059
FBGJ.
C. WARHEAD INITIATION AT FORWARD END B. WARHEAD -|NIT|ATION AT BOTH ENDS (SIMULTANEOUSLY) INVENTOR.
RICHARD G. IVIOE BY ROY MILLER ATTOR NEY.
GERALD BAKER AGENT.
SHEET 2 OF 3 NM? MMP PATENIEU B53 1 M CONFIGURED BLAST FRAGMENTATION WARHEAD BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Prior fragmentation warheads have generally been initiated from a single, axially located, detonator. Such prior warheads were suitable, for example, in antipersonnel devices or the like where a pattern of widely scattered fragments was desirable. An air to ground missile warhead has been developed having a fragmentation pattern directed in accordance with a predetermined charge to metal ratio and designed for use against ground installations. One such warhead is described in assignees US. Pat. No. 3,498,224, issued Mar. 3, 1970. In air-to-air devices, however, it has been found that a more concentrated beam of fragments gives a much greater possibility of structural damage to the target.
According to the present invention, a configured blast fragmentation (CBF) warhead and a method is provided which causes the fragments to focus into an isotropic annular disk upon multipoint double end initiation or in a forward or aft conical disk when initiated on either end respectively. A shift of the fragment beam spray can be obtained by selective initiation of either end of the warhead, thus increasing the lethal interval of the warhead along the missile trajectory. In modern missiles, selective initiation may be accomplished with the aid of available missle intelligence through a simple logic switching network.
The'basic warhead initiation scheme is double ended,
, simultaneous, multipoint initiation. This causes the fragments to focus into an isotropic annular disk with the width of the disk being approximately equal to the original length of the warhead.
The successful use of this concept involves optimizing the energy content of the warhead/fragment systent. The basic philosophy is to optimize the initial available explosive energy (on an MV basis, for example) and effect the most efficient transfer of this energy into high velocity fragments.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a graphic illustration of the basic concept of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a perspective view partly in section showing a first embodiment of a warhead according to the invention;
FIG. 3a is a longitudinal cross sectional view of a sec- 0nd embodiment;
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION In FIG. 1 of the drawing it may be seen that when a warhead manufactured according to the present invention is initiated at the after end, a forwardly directed conical fragment pattern is achieved as shown at (A). A similar directional fragment pattern is directed aft when the warhead is initiated at the forward end as shown at (C). When the warhead is initiated at both ends simultaneously, the fragment beam tends to converge on a peripheral line that is at a radius from the warhead corresponding to the design radius for the particular configuration used. Many missiles, at present, have available information in the guidance circuitry which is sufficient to provide controls to selectively initiate detonation in an optimum mode based on some combination of missile and target attitude, proximity, etc.
The warhead 10, shown in FIG. 2, is encased in a shroud 12 and filled with a high explosive 14. Just inside of shroud 12 is a full length fragmentation layer 16 having a second fragment layer 18 fore and aft. A conventional safe and arm device 29 fills about half of the central cavity 20 and carries a booster 22 in most applications. Detonators 24 are placed in a plurality of locations spaced around the end plates 30, 30' and are connected to the booster 22 by means of detonation trains 26. The two end pieces 32, 32 are made integral with the shroud l2 and are configured to connect to other portions of a missile shroud by being provided with grooves or threads 28, 28 and necessary holes 33. Both fragment layers are scored on the inner surface in a grid pattern as shown at 19.
The warhead 100 shown in FIG. 3a is similar in most respects to the warhead 10 of FIG. 2. The fragment layer 116, however, is tapered from the center toward each end with a void space between the fragment layer 116 and shroud 112. Items in FIGS. 3a and 3b which are the same or similar to comparable items in FIG. 2 are designated by the same number increased by 100. Thus the shroud in FIG. 3a is 112, the'explosive material 114, etc., and the FIG. 4 device uses the same numbers in the 200 series.
The warhead 200 in the FIG. 4 version has the void space between the outer fragment layer 216 and shroud 212 filled with an inert material 204 which contributes to the warheads bullet resistance, shock resistance, heat resistance, etc.
FIG. 5 illustrates still another configuration of the fragment layers, similar to that in FIG. 4 but with the layers 316, 318 being straight.
FIGS. 6 and 7 illustrate how the booster or firing device is attached to the safe and arm device 29. The booster devices vary in configuration depending on the desired firing pattern. The booster shown in cross section in FIG. 8 will fire in a peripheral manner to ignite all of the detonation trains 26 (or 126, 226) simultaneously, thus causing multipoint double end initiation of the main explosive charge.
An optimum utilization of the CBF warhead concept should utilize a fragment size and shape which produces the maximum target response. The optimum convergent fragment beam would converge on a peripheral line that is at a radius from the warhead corresponding to the maximum catastrophic kill radius of the warhead design. The CBF designs tested thus far exhibit the largest catastrophic kill radius for a given weight limited warhead system.
A shift of the fragment beam spray (and a deemphasis of the fragment focusssing effect) can be obtained by selective initiation of either end of the warhead. This is useful in increasing the warheads lethal interval along the missile trajectory but requires the availability of certain missile intelligence and a simple logic switching and selectable initiation network.
Further, the CBF fragment lead angle can be altered by tapering the fragment wall to cause the fragments to converge on a peripheral line other than the focus point or line that would be produced by a cylindrical fragment wall. This also reduces the fragment velocity gradient and concentrates the fragmentation effects on a high velocity target.
Particular fragmentation warheads which optimize the initial total energy content of the fragments and concentrate this energy along a plane perpendicular to the warheads longitudinal axis have demonstrated superior lethality against aerial targets. The output of the Annular Blast Fragmentation (ABF) warhead mechanism is concentrated in a planar disk. The disk thickness is approximately the distance between planes perpendicular to the warhead longitudinal axis at each end bulkhead of the warhead. This localized energy on an aerial target results in a relatively large number of catastrophic structural kills as compared to other conventional warheads. The high velocity of the fragments alleviates the fuzing equation compromise that is required over a wide range of air target encounter conditions. Future application to surface targets is likely.
The ABF warhead configuration that is considered most promising is a cylindrical warhead utilizing double end, simultaneous initiation of multipoint boosters. The multi-walled, tapered cylindrical mild steel fragmenting case utilizes an inner surface grid system which controls the fragment size and shape. This fragment size and shape efficiently couples with the aerial targets, within the threat spectrum, to produce a high percentage of catastrophic structural kills. The explosive material is selected on a maximum energy basis with consideration given to bullet impact and open flame cook-off sensitivity.
What is claimed is:
1. A substantially cylindrical warhead having a fragmentation casing;
detonation initiation means centrally located in said warhead a plurality of detonation boosters spaced around each end of said warhead; and detonation transfer means connecting said intiation menas and said booster means;
whereby the warhead may be selectively detonated at a plurality of points at either end or both ends or detonated centrally.
2. A warhead according to claim 1 wherein said casing comprises a plurality of fragmentation layers.
3. A warhead according to claim 2 wherein said fragmentation layers taper from a maximum central diameter to a minimum diameter at the ends leaving a frustoconical torroidal space at each end between the outermost of said layers and said shroud.
4. A warhead according to claim 3 wherein said space is filled with an inert material.
5. A warhead according to claim 3 wherein said space is filled with an inert solid material.
6. A warhead according to claim 2 wherein said lay ers include a full length outer layer and one or more shorter inner layers.
7. A warhead according to claim 5 wherein said layers consist of one full length outer layer and one shorter, centrally located inner layer.
8. A warhead according to claim 5 wherein said layers consist of one full length outer layer and a shorter inner layer located at each end.

Claims (8)

1. A substantially cylindrical warhead having a fragmentation casing; detonation initiation means centrally located in said warhead a plurality of detonation boosters spaced around each end of said warhead; and detonation transfer means connecting said intiation menas and said booster means; whereby the warhead may be selectively detonated at a plurality of points at either end or both ends or detonated centrally.
2. A warhead according to claim 1 wherein said casing comprises a plurality of fragmentation layers.
3. A warhead according to claim 2 wherein said fragmentation layers taper from a maximum central diameter to a minimum diameter at the ends leaving a frusto-conical torroidal space at each end between the outermost of said layers and said shroud.
4. A warhead according to claim 3 wherein said space is filled with an inert material.
5. A warhead according to claim 3 wherein said space is filled with an inert solid material.
6. A warhead according to claim 2 wherein said layers include a full length outer layer and one or more shorter inner layers.
7. A warhead according to claim 5 wherein said layers consist of one full length outer layer and one shorter, centrally located inner layer.
8. A warhead according to claim 5 wherein said layers consist of one full length outer layer and a shorter inner layer located at each end.
US00105739A 1971-01-11 1971-01-11 Configured blast fragmentation warhead Expired - Lifetime US3853059A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US00105739A US3853059A (en) 1971-01-11 1971-01-11 Configured blast fragmentation warhead

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US00105739A US3853059A (en) 1971-01-11 1971-01-11 Configured blast fragmentation warhead

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3853059A true US3853059A (en) 1974-12-10

Family

ID=22307522

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US00105739A Expired - Lifetime US3853059A (en) 1971-01-11 1971-01-11 Configured blast fragmentation warhead

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3853059A (en)

Cited By (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3977327A (en) * 1973-06-25 1976-08-31 United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Controlled fragmentation warhead
US4075541A (en) * 1972-12-15 1978-02-21 Keishin Matsumoto Direct current motor control device for use in battery automobiles
US4145972A (en) * 1976-12-17 1979-03-27 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Dual-mode warhead initiation system
US4282814A (en) * 1974-12-20 1981-08-11 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Dual-end warhead initiation system
US4459915A (en) * 1982-10-18 1984-07-17 General Dynamics Corporation/Convair Div. Combined rocket motor warhead
FR2550857A1 (en) * 1983-08-16 1985-02-22 Matra EXPLOSIVE MILITARY LOAD
US4655139A (en) * 1984-09-28 1987-04-07 The Boeing Company Selectable deployment mode fragment warhead
US4658727A (en) * 1984-09-28 1987-04-21 The Boeing Company Selectable initiation-point fragment warhead
US4662281A (en) * 1984-09-28 1987-05-05 The Boeing Company Low velocity disc pattern fragment warhead
US4664035A (en) * 1982-03-01 1987-05-12 Science Applications International Corp. Missile warheads
US4823701A (en) * 1984-09-28 1989-04-25 The Boeing Company Multi-point warhead initiation system
US5313887A (en) * 1990-05-23 1994-05-24 J.E.M. Smoke Machine Company Pyrotechnic device
US5509357A (en) * 1995-03-03 1996-04-23 Northrop Grumman Corporation Dual operating mode warhead
WO1997016696A1 (en) * 1995-11-02 1997-05-09 Hollandse Signaalapparaten B.V. Fragmentable projectile, weapon system and method for destroying a target
US5668346A (en) * 1995-05-08 1997-09-16 Diehl Gmbh & Co. Submunition
FR2775770A1 (en) * 1998-03-06 1999-09-10 Commissariat Energie Atomique Explosive mine clearance munition
WO2001073370A1 (en) * 2000-03-25 2001-10-04 TDW Gesellschaft für verteidigungstechnische Wirksysteme mbH Explosive charge for a warhead
DE10213691A1 (en) * 2002-03-27 2003-11-13 Diehl Munitionssysteme Gmbh Method of protecting an object
US20050241521A1 (en) * 2004-03-18 2005-11-03 Giat Industries Device enabling the ignition of two explosive charges and warhead implementing such an ignition device
FR2896577A1 (en) * 2006-01-24 2007-07-27 Giat Ind Sa Primer for multi-mode explosive charge has fixed priming plate with explosive-filled channels linking peripheral relays to priming point
EP1971818A1 (en) * 2006-01-13 2008-09-24 BAE Systems Bofors AB Method of initiating external explosive charges and explosive-charged action elements for these
US7743707B1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2010-06-29 Lockheed Martin Corporation Fragmentation warhead with selectable radius of effects
US20100263566A1 (en) * 2006-12-20 2010-10-21 Ruhlman James D Reduced Collateral Damage Bomb (RCDB) Including Fuse System with Shaped Charges and a System and Method of Making Same
US7891297B1 (en) * 2005-10-14 2011-02-22 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Adaptable smart warhead and method for use
US8464639B2 (en) * 2007-07-30 2013-06-18 Blake K. THOMAS Shaped charge fuse booster system for dial lethality in reduced collateral damage bombs (RCDB)
US9303966B1 (en) * 2015-01-29 2016-04-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Symmetical initiation distributor for use in explosive detonation trains with an offset orientation
WO2017120684A1 (en) 2016-01-15 2017-07-20 Saab Bofors Dynamics Switzerland Ltd Warhead
US10690464B2 (en) 2017-04-28 2020-06-23 Vista Outdoor Operations Llc Cartridge with combined effects projectile
US10982942B1 (en) * 2018-09-18 2021-04-20 Corvid Technologies LLC Munitions and methods for operating same

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1276434A (en) * 1917-10-09 1918-08-20 Joseph A Steinmetz Grenade.
US3136251A (en) * 1963-01-18 1964-06-09 Morris I Witow Electrically controlled directional warhead
US3447463A (en) * 1967-05-01 1969-06-03 Arthur Alfred Lavine Dual ignition explosive arrangement
US3490374A (en) * 1956-06-07 1970-01-20 Us Navy Continuous rod warhead

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1276434A (en) * 1917-10-09 1918-08-20 Joseph A Steinmetz Grenade.
US3490374A (en) * 1956-06-07 1970-01-20 Us Navy Continuous rod warhead
US3136251A (en) * 1963-01-18 1964-06-09 Morris I Witow Electrically controlled directional warhead
US3447463A (en) * 1967-05-01 1969-06-03 Arthur Alfred Lavine Dual ignition explosive arrangement

Cited By (43)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4075541A (en) * 1972-12-15 1978-02-21 Keishin Matsumoto Direct current motor control device for use in battery automobiles
US3977327A (en) * 1973-06-25 1976-08-31 United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Controlled fragmentation warhead
US4282814A (en) * 1974-12-20 1981-08-11 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Dual-end warhead initiation system
US4145972A (en) * 1976-12-17 1979-03-27 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Dual-mode warhead initiation system
US4664035A (en) * 1982-03-01 1987-05-12 Science Applications International Corp. Missile warheads
US4459915A (en) * 1982-10-18 1984-07-17 General Dynamics Corporation/Convair Div. Combined rocket motor warhead
FR2550857A1 (en) * 1983-08-16 1985-02-22 Matra EXPLOSIVE MILITARY LOAD
EP0138640A1 (en) * 1983-08-16 1985-04-24 Matra Explosive charge for military use
US4655139A (en) * 1984-09-28 1987-04-07 The Boeing Company Selectable deployment mode fragment warhead
US4658727A (en) * 1984-09-28 1987-04-21 The Boeing Company Selectable initiation-point fragment warhead
US4662281A (en) * 1984-09-28 1987-05-05 The Boeing Company Low velocity disc pattern fragment warhead
US4823701A (en) * 1984-09-28 1989-04-25 The Boeing Company Multi-point warhead initiation system
US5375523A (en) * 1990-05-23 1994-12-27 J.E.M. Smoke Machine Company, Ltd. Pyrotechnic device
US5313887A (en) * 1990-05-23 1994-05-24 J.E.M. Smoke Machine Company Pyrotechnic device
US5509357A (en) * 1995-03-03 1996-04-23 Northrop Grumman Corporation Dual operating mode warhead
WO1996027775A1 (en) * 1995-03-03 1996-09-12 Northrop Grumman Corporation Dual operating mode warhead
US5668346A (en) * 1995-05-08 1997-09-16 Diehl Gmbh & Co. Submunition
WO1997016696A1 (en) * 1995-11-02 1997-05-09 Hollandse Signaalapparaten B.V. Fragmentable projectile, weapon system and method for destroying a target
NL1001556C2 (en) * 1995-11-02 1997-05-13 Hollandse Signaalapparaten Bv Fragmentable projectile, weapon system and working method.
FR2775770A1 (en) * 1998-03-06 1999-09-10 Commissariat Energie Atomique Explosive mine clearance munition
WO2001073370A1 (en) * 2000-03-25 2001-10-04 TDW Gesellschaft für verteidigungstechnische Wirksysteme mbH Explosive charge for a warhead
DE10213691B4 (en) * 2002-03-27 2004-11-25 Diehl Munitionssysteme Gmbh & Co. Kg Method of protecting an object
DE10213691A1 (en) * 2002-03-27 2003-11-13 Diehl Munitionssysteme Gmbh Method of protecting an object
US20050241521A1 (en) * 2004-03-18 2005-11-03 Giat Industries Device enabling the ignition of two explosive charges and warhead implementing such an ignition device
US8661982B2 (en) 2005-10-14 2014-03-04 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Adaptable smart warhead and method for use
US7891297B1 (en) * 2005-10-14 2011-02-22 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Adaptable smart warhead and method for use
US8365671B2 (en) 2005-10-14 2013-02-05 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Adaptable smart warhead charge and method for use
EP1971818A1 (en) * 2006-01-13 2008-09-24 BAE Systems Bofors AB Method of initiating external explosive charges and explosive-charged action elements for these
EP1971818A4 (en) * 2006-01-13 2012-01-04 Bae Systems Bofors Ab Method of initiating external explosive charges and explosive-charged action elements for these
FR2896577A1 (en) * 2006-01-24 2007-07-27 Giat Ind Sa Primer for multi-mode explosive charge has fixed priming plate with explosive-filled channels linking peripheral relays to priming point
US20100263566A1 (en) * 2006-12-20 2010-10-21 Ruhlman James D Reduced Collateral Damage Bomb (RCDB) Including Fuse System with Shaped Charges and a System and Method of Making Same
US8191479B2 (en) 2006-12-20 2012-06-05 Ruhlman James D Reduced collateral damage bomb (RCDB) including fuse system with shaped charges and a system and method of making same
US7743707B1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2010-06-29 Lockheed Martin Corporation Fragmentation warhead with selectable radius of effects
US8464639B2 (en) * 2007-07-30 2013-06-18 Blake K. THOMAS Shaped charge fuse booster system for dial lethality in reduced collateral damage bombs (RCDB)
US9303966B1 (en) * 2015-01-29 2016-04-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Symmetical initiation distributor for use in explosive detonation trains with an offset orientation
WO2017120684A1 (en) 2016-01-15 2017-07-20 Saab Bofors Dynamics Switzerland Ltd Warhead
US20190033047A1 (en) * 2016-01-15 2019-01-31 Saab Bofors Dynamics Switzerland Ltd. Warhead
US10612899B2 (en) * 2016-01-15 2020-04-07 Saab Bofors Dynamics Switzerland Ltd. Warhead
US10690464B2 (en) 2017-04-28 2020-06-23 Vista Outdoor Operations Llc Cartridge with combined effects projectile
US11226182B2 (en) 2017-04-28 2022-01-18 Vista Outdoor Operations Llc Cartridge with combined effects projectile
US10982942B1 (en) * 2018-09-18 2021-04-20 Corvid Technologies LLC Munitions and methods for operating same
US11359901B1 (en) * 2018-09-18 2022-06-14 Corvid Technologies LLC Munitions and methods for operating same
US11598621B1 (en) 2018-09-18 2023-03-07 Corvid Technologies LLC Munitions and methods for operating same

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3853059A (en) Configured blast fragmentation warhead
US3949674A (en) Operation of fragment core warhead
CN111928738B (en) Composite warhead device with adjustable damage power for killing broken armor
US4106410A (en) Layered fragmentation device
US3757694A (en) Fragment core warhead
US3565009A (en) Aimed quadrant warhead
US3960085A (en) Variable geometry warhead
US5182418A (en) Aimable warhead
US5509357A (en) Dual operating mode warhead
US3726223A (en) Adaptive warhead
JP4295224B2 (en) Kinetic energy rod warhead with implosive glaze for isotropic launch of penetrators
US3796159A (en) Explosive fisheye lens warhead
US4334474A (en) Warhead initiation system
US3714897A (en) Directed warhead
US3677183A (en) Pre-shaped fragmentation device
US6510797B1 (en) Segmented kinetic energy explosively formed penetrator assembly
US6308634B1 (en) Precursor-follow through explosively formed penetrator assembly
US3703865A (en) Electronically controlled aimed blast warhead
US4878432A (en) Multistage kinetic energy penetrator
US3179052A (en) Drag collar for varying the range of rockets
US4579059A (en) Tubular projectile having an explosive material therein
JP4234717B2 (en) Kinetic energy rod warhead for isotropic launch of projectile
US3675577A (en) Rod warhead
US3490374A (en) Continuous rod warhead
US2972950A (en) Rod type explosive warhead