JP2015075442A - Automatic analyzer - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To solve problems, for example, reinspection of an analysis item, even of the analysis item having high priority, cannot be started until results of initial inspection of all other analysis items are outputted, and, when samples of the item in which reinspection is executed are alternately changed due to end timing of the initial analysis, a sample consumption amount increases.SOLUTION: Priority of reinspection is set for each analysis item, and at timing in which initial measurement results of the analysis items, whose priority of reinspection is all equal, are all outputted, reinspection of the analysis items having equal priority of reinspection, are executed at the same time.

Description

  The present invention relates to an automatic analyzer that automatically analyzes specimens (samples) such as blood and urine.

  Techniques related to the automatic analyzer are disclosed in Patent Document 1 (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 9-21813) and Patent Document 2 (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 63-12964). Patent Document 1 discloses an automatic analyzer that analyzes the analysis item set as the highest priority item among a plurality of analysis items with the highest priority. Patent Document 2 discloses an automatic analyzer that immediately re-analyzes an analysis item in which a data alarm is added to a measurement result.

JP-A-9-21813 JP-A-63-12964

  However, in the case of the automatic analyzer described in Patent Document 1, the first analysis is performed with the highest priority on the analysis item set as the highest priority item, but the re-analysis of the analysis item to be analyzed with the highest priority is performed. The timing is waited until all the results of the initial analysis of other analysis items are output.

  On the other hand, in the case of the automatic analyzer described in Patent Document 2, when a large number of analysis items need to be re-analyzed and when the output timing of each analysis item is different, sample switching frequently occurs, Every time switching is performed, the specimen remaining on the probe is discarded, washed, and a dummy suction of another specimen occurs. Here, the dummy suction of the specimen is an operation of sucking in the probe an amount of specimen more than that necessary for the examination in order to suppress a decrease in the density of the specimen sucked into the probe. Therefore, at the end of the examination, a dummy amount of sample remains in the probe. Therefore, when sample switching frequently occurs, the automatic analyzer described in Patent Document 2 inevitably increases the amount of sample discarded and increases the amount of sample consumed.

  As soon as all measurement results of analysis items having the same re-examination priority are output, the present invention performs the re-examination analysis of these analysis items together, thereby performing automatic re-examination of analysis items with high re-examination priority and sample To provide an automatic analyzer that can achieve a balanced balance of consumption.

  In order to solve the above problems, for example, the configuration described in the claims is adopted. This specification includes a plurality of means for solving the above problems. To give an example, the retest priority is set for each analysis item, and all the initial measurement results of the analysis items having the same retest priority are output. The re-examination analysis of the analysis items having the same re-examination priority is collectively performed at the determined timing. As another example, the re-examination remaining waiting time at which the countdown starts when the initial measurement result of the analysis item is obtained and the re-examination waiting time registered for the analysis item from which the initial measurement result was obtained are shown. In comparison, if the re-examination waiting time of the analysis item for which the first measurement result is newly obtained is smaller than the re-examination remaining waiting time, the re-examination waiting time is updated with the re-examination waiting time. Re-analyze analysis items for which measurement results have been output before reaching zero.

  According to one aspect of the present invention, the retest analysis of the analysis item is performed at the timing when all the first measurement results of the test items having the same retest priority are output (without waiting for the output of the first measurement results of other analysis items). Can be executed in units of re-examination priority. According to another aspect of the present invention, the retest waiting time corresponding to the first measurement results output one after another is compared with the latest retest remaining waiting time, and the retest remaining waiting time is constantly updated to a smaller value. Then, the re-examination analysis of the analysis items output until the remaining re-examination waiting time becomes zero can be executed collectively. As a result, re-examination of analysis items having a high re-examination priority can be started earlier than in the conventional method. In addition, according to the present invention, since the retest analysis is performed collectively for a plurality of analysis items, the number of times of sample switching is reduced, and the consumption of the sample can be suppressed correspondingly. In other words, it is possible to realize in a well-balanced manner the execution of automatic retesting of analysis items with high priority and the suppression of sample consumption. Problems, configurations, and effects other than those described above will become apparent from the following description of embodiments.

The figure which shows the whole structure (Example 1) of an automatic analyzer. The figure which shows the setting screen (Example 1) of the analysis parameter used for the setting of a reexamination priority. The flowchart which shows the process sequence (Example 1) used in order to perform an analysis according to the reexamination priority set through the setting screen. The figure explaining the comparison result of the re-examination timing by a prior art, and the re-examination timing by the technique of Example 1. FIG. The figure explaining the comparison result of the dummy suction by a prior art and the dummy suction by the technique of Example 1. FIG. The figure which shows the whole structure (Example 2) of an automatic analyzer. The figure which shows the setting screen (Example 2) of the analysis parameter used for the setting of a reexamination priority. The flowchart which shows the setting operation of "re-examination waiting time presence / absence" and the setting operation of "re-examination waiting time" performed at the time of the output of a measurement result. The flowchart which shows the process sequence used for reexamination analysis allocation. The figure explaining the reexamination timing in Example 2. FIG. The figure explaining the comparison result of the initial analysis timing by a prior art, and the initial analysis timing by the technique of Example 3. FIG.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. The embodiment of the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described later, and various modifications are possible within the scope of the technical idea.

[Example 1]
[Device configuration]
FIG. 1 shows an example of the overall configuration of a biopsy automatic analyzer (hereinafter referred to as “automatic analyzer”). The automatic analyzer 100 includes an analysis unit 110 that automatically analyzes a sample, and an operation unit 130 that operates the analysis unit 110. The operation unit 130 is a general computer and includes a CPU, a RAM, a ROM, a hard disk device, and the like (not shown). The operation unit 130 includes an input device (keyboard 131 and mouse 132) for an operator to input data, a display device 133 for displaying data and a user interface screen, and a printing device 135 for printing data. And an interface 137 for connecting to the analysis unit 110.

  In addition, the operation unit 130 includes a storage device 136 that stores various types of information such as an analysis allocation waiting table 1361 and a measurement result storage table 1362 described later. The storage device 136 may be constituted by a hard disk device, for example, and may be built in the computer main body 134. The computer main body 134 has a function of updating various information stored in the storage device 136. The computer main body 134 also has a function of transmitting various types of information stored in the storage device 136 to the computer main body 111 of the analysis unit 110.

  The analysis unit 110 is connected to the operation unit 130 via the interface 137. The analysis unit 110 includes a reaction disk 112, and a plurality of reaction vessels 113 are installed on the concentric circle. A reagent disk 114 is disposed around the reaction disk 112, and a plurality of reagent bottles 115 containing various reagents are installed on the concentric circumference thereof. Further, around the reaction disk 112, a sample dispensing probe 116, a stirring device 117, a cleaning device 118, a light source 119, and a multi-wavelength photometer 120 are arranged. A reagent dispensing probe 121 is disposed between the reaction disk 112 and the reagent disk 114.

  A sample disk 122 is installed on the rotation circumference of the sample dispensing probe 116 and next to the reagent disk 114. A plurality of sample containers 123 containing samples are installed on the sample disk 122. All the operations of these mechanisms are controlled by the computer main body 111 via the interface 124. In addition, the analysis unit 110 includes an A / D (Analog to Digital) converter 126 that converts a detection signal of the multi-wavelength photometer 120 into a digital signal, and a specimen barcode reader 125.

  The operator inputs measurement items to the computer main body 134 using the display device 133 on the operation unit 130 side and the keyboard 131 or the mouse 132, and gives an analysis instruction to the analysis unit 110 from the computer main body 134. The analysis instruction is transmitted from the computer main body 134 to the analysis unit 110 via the interfaces 137 and 124. The analysis unit 110 executes the following analysis operation according to the received analysis instruction.

  The analysis unit 110 dispenses the sample in the sample container 123 into the reaction container 113 by the sample dispensing probe 116 in an amount corresponding to the requested number of items. When the analysis unit 110 completes the dispensing for one sample container 123, the analysis unit 110 rotates the sample disk 122 so that the next sample container 123 is directly below the sample dispensing probe 116. The reaction vessel 113 into which the sample has been dispensed rotates as the reaction disk 112 rotates. Meanwhile, the reagent in the reagent bottle 115 is additionally dispensed by the reagent dispensing probe 121 to the sample dispensed in the reaction container 113. Thereafter, the reaction liquid of the sample and the reagent in the reaction vessel 113 is stirred by the stirring device 117, and the absorbance is measured by the light source 119 and the multiwavelength photometer 120. Thereafter, the reaction vessel 113 is cleaned by the cleaning device 118.

  The absorbance signal measured by the multiwavelength photometer 120 is input to the computer main body 111 on the analysis unit 110 side via the A / D converter 126 and the interface 124. The computer main body 111 executes processing corresponding to the type of sample based on an analysis method and an absorbance signal set in advance for each analysis item. For example, when the sample is a standard solution sample, the computer main body 111 calculates calibration curve data from the set concentration data. For example, when the sample is a patient sample and a control sample, the computer main body 111 calculates concentration data from calibration curve data obtained by measuring a standard solution sample. The computer main body 111 records the calculated data as a measurement result, and adds information that symbolizes the type of the sample.

  The analysis unit 110 performs the analysis processing of the specimen mounted on the sample disk 122 by the above procedure. The analysis result is transmitted from the computer main body 111 of the analysis unit 110 to the computer main body 134 of the operation unit 130 through the interfaces 124 and 137. The computer main body 134 on the operation unit 130 side stores the received analysis result in the storage device 136 and outputs it to the display device 133 and the printing device 135. In this way, the computer main body 134 on the operation unit 130 side causes the analysis unit 110 to analyze each sample installed on the sample disk 122. In the present embodiment, the computer main body 134 on the operation unit 130 side determines the analysis order of each sample in the analysis unit 110.

[Analysis parameter setting screen example]
FIG. 2 shows an analysis parameter setting screen 200 used in this embodiment. The setting screen 200 is displayed on the display device 133 through the computer main body 134. The setting screen 200 includes an input field 201 composed of item names and types, and an input field 202 for various conditions (an analysis input field, a calibration input field, a range input field, and other input fields). FIG. 2 shows a state in which the range input field is displayed.

  Since the present embodiment aims to solve the technical problem at the time of automatic reexamination, only the automatic reexamination priority setting column 210 in the range input column will be described. The automatic reexamination priority setting column 210 is provided with an automatic reexamination check box 211. When the check box 211 is checked, it is possible to input the priority of automatic reexamination. In this embodiment, the priority is selected from “Group A” 213, “Group B” 214, “Item” 215, and “Sample” 216.

  The analysis item for which “Group A” 213 is selected is the timing at which all the initial analysis results of the analysis items for which “Group A” is selected from among the other analysis items for which “Group A” is requested to be analyzed are output. The re-analysis is performed automatically.

  The analysis item for which “Group B” 214 is selected is the timing at which all the initial analysis results of the analysis items for which “Group B” is selected from among the other analysis items for which “Group B” is requested to be analyzed are output. The re-analysis is performed automatically.

  For the analysis item for which “item” 215 is selected, after the measurement result of the initial analysis is output, the re-examination analysis is automatically executed immediately for each item when the re-examination analysis is necessary.

  For the analysis item for which “sample” 216 is selected, re-analysis is automatically executed after the measurement results of the first analysis of all analysis items for which “analysis is requested” for “same sample” are output.

[Processing Procedure in Example 1]
FIG. 3 shows a flowchart of a processing procedure executed after the measurement result of the first analysis is output. The processing procedure is executed according to a program installed in the computer main body 134 on the operation unit 130 side. The same processing may be executed by the computer main body 111 on the analysis unit 110 side.

(Step S311)
When the measurement result of the first analysis is output, the computer main body 134 stores the measurement result in the measurement result storage table 1362.

(Step S312)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether or not the re-examination priority of the output measurement result is “group A”. If the reexamination priority is “group A”, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S313. On the other hand, if the retest priority is not “group A”, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S316.

(Step S313)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether or not the measurement results of all analysis items for which “group A” is selected for the same sample have been output based on the output of the current measurement results. If the measurement results of all analysis items for which “group A” is selected have been output, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S314. On the other hand, when analysis items for which measurement results have not been output remain among analysis items for which “Group A” has been selected (when all of the analysis items have not been output), the computer main unit 134 waits for output of another measurement result. Return to.

(Step S314)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether there is an item to be subjected to the re-analysis. If there is an analysis item that needs re-analysis, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S315. On the other hand, if there is no analysis item that needs re-analysis, the computer main unit 134 returns to a state of waiting for output of another measurement result.

(Step S315)
In this step, the computer main body 134 stores “measurement request information for each sample” in the analysis allocation waiting table 1361. Here, “sample-specific measurement request information” is information in units of samples including information such as analysis items necessary for performing analysis. Furthermore, the analysis allocation waiting table 1361 is a table in which information on a sample unit that needs to be analyzed is stored for each sample type. Sample types include “Calibration”, “Emergency sample (retest analysis)”, “Emergency sample (initial analysis)”, “Control”, “General sample (retest analysis)”, “General sample (initial analysis)” ”And the like, and the analysis is performed in order from the sample type with the highest priority. When performing the analysis, the “sample-specific measurement request information” of the sample type with the highest priority is sequentially extracted from the analysis allocation waiting table 1361 and analyzed. Thereafter, the computer main body 134 returns to a state of waiting for output of another measurement result.

(Step S316)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether or not the re-examination priority of the output measurement result is “group B”. If the reexamination priority is “group B”, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S317. On the other hand, if the reexamination priority is not “group B”, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S320.

(Step S317)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether or not the measurement results of all the analysis items for which “Group B” is selected for the same sample have been output based on the output of the current measurement results. If the measurement results of all the analysis items for which “Group B” has been selected have been output, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S318. On the other hand, when the analysis items with the output of the measurement result remain in the analysis items for which “Group B” is selected (when all of the output items have not been output), the computer main body 134 waits for the output of another measurement result. Return to.

(Step S318)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether there is an item for which re-examination analysis is performed. If there is an analysis item that needs re-analysis, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S319. On the other hand, if there is no analysis item that needs re-analysis, the computer main unit 134 returns to a state of waiting for output of another measurement result.

(Step S319)
In this step, the computer main body 134 stores “measurement request information for each sample” in the analysis allocation waiting table 1361. Thereafter, the computer main body 134 returns to a state of waiting for output of another measurement result.

(Step S320)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether or not the re-examination priority of the output measurement result is “item”. If the reexamination priority is “item”, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S321. On the other hand, if the reexamination priority is not “item”, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S323.

(Step S321)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether a retest analysis is necessary. When the re-analysis is necessary, the computer main body 134 proceeds to step S322. On the other hand, when the re-analysis is not necessary, the computer main body 134 returns to a state of waiting for the output of another measurement result.

(Step S322)
In this step, the computer main body 134 stores “measurement request information for each sample” in the analysis allocation waiting table 1361. Thereafter, the computer main body 134 returns to a state of waiting for output of another measurement result.

(Step S323)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether or not the re-examination priority of the output measurement result is “sample”. If the retest priority is “sample”, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S324. On the other hand, when the retest priority is not “sample”, the computer main body 134 returns to a state of waiting for output of another measurement result.

(Step S324)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether or not all the measurement results of the analysis items requested to be analyzed for the same sample are output based on the current measurement result. When the measurement results are output for all the analysis items, the computer main body 134 proceeds to step S325. On the other hand, when the measurement results are not output for all the analysis items, the computer main body 134 returns to a state of waiting for the output of another measurement result.

(Step S325)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether there is a retest analysis item. If there is a retest analysis item, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S326. On the other hand, when there is no retest analysis item, the computer main body 134 returns to a state of waiting for output of another measurement result.

(Step S326)
In this step, the computer main body 134 stores “measurement request information for each sample” in the analysis allocation waiting table 1361. Thereafter, the computer main body 134 returns to a state of waiting for output of another measurement result.

[Comparative example]
FIG. 4 shows the retest timing according to the prior art and the retest timing according to the technique of the first embodiment. The upper part of FIG. 4 shows the retest timing when the technique described in Patent Document 1 is applied. The lower part of FIG. 4 shows the retest timing when the technique of the first embodiment (the processing procedure shown in FIG. 3) is applied.

  In FIG. 4, a case will be described in which TS_A, TS_B, TS_C, TS_D, TS_E, and TS_F are priority items, and TS_G and TS_H are not priority items. Note that the priority order is TS_A> TS_B> TS_C> TS_D> TS_E> TS_F, and the reaction times are all the same. In addition, we will verify cases where data alarms that require re-analysis are added for all items.

  In the prior art, first, according to the priority order, the initial analysis of TS_A, TS_B, TS_C, TS_D, TS_E, and TS_F that are priority items is performed, and then the initial analysis of TS_G and TS_H that are not priority items is performed. The re-examination analysis of the prior art is executed after timing 401 when all the measurement results of the initial analysis are output and scheduling for the re-examination analysis is completed. In this case, re-examination analysis of each item is executed in the same order as in the first analysis. As shown in the upper part of FIG. 4, there is a waiting time until the re-analysis of the priority item TS_A is started.

  On the other hand, in this embodiment, four types of settings can be set as the retest priority. In this embodiment, the item TS_A has a re-examination priority of “item”, the items TS_B, TS_C, and TS_D have a re-examination priority of “group A”, the items TS_E and TS_F have a re-examination priority of “group B”, and others. In this case, “sample” is designated as the retest priority of the item.

  Also in this implementation, the initial analysis is performed in the same order as in the prior art. However, the automatic reexamination of the item TS_A is scheduled and executed immediately after the measurement result of the initial analysis is output (timing 402). This is because the re-examination priority of the item TS_A is designated as “item” 215. That is, at the stage where the necessity of the retest analysis is confirmed in step S321, the retest analysis is scheduled immediately, and the retest analysis is executed without waiting for the completion of the initial analysis for all other items.

  The re-examination priority of items TS_B, TS_C, and TS_D are all designated as “Group A” 213. Therefore, the automatic re-examination of the items TS_B, TS_C, and TS_D is scheduled and executed when the measurement results of the first analysis are output for all of the items TS_B, TS_C, and TS_D specified in the “group A” 213 (timing) 403). That is, when the measurement result of the item TS_D is obtained, step S313 is affirmative and the process proceeds to step S314. In this case, because the items registered in Group A are enabled for re-analysis, the re-analysis is scheduled immediately, and the re-analysis is performed without waiting for the completion of the initial analysis for all other items. The

  The re-examination priorities of the items TS_E and TS_F are both designated as “Group B” 214. Therefore, the automatic re-examination of the items TS_E and TS_F is scheduled and executed when the measurement results of the first analysis are output for all of the items TS_E and TS_F designated in the “group B” 214 (timing 404). That is, when the measurement result of the item TS_F is obtained, step S317 becomes a positive result, and the process proceeds to step S318. In this case, the items registered in Group B are enabled for re-analysis, so the re-analysis is scheduled immediately and the re-analysis is performed without waiting for the completion of the initial analysis for all other items. The

  The retest priority of items TS_G and TS_H are both designated as “sample” 216. Therefore, the automatic re-examination of the items TS_G and TS_H is scheduled and executed when the measurement results of the initial analysis are output for all the items TS_G and TS_H designated in the “sample” 216 (timing 405). That is, when the measurement result of the item TS_H is obtained, step S324 becomes a positive result and the process proceeds to step S325. In this case, the items registered in the sample are set to have re-analysis, so the re-analysis is scheduled immediately and the re-analysis is performed without waiting for the completion of the initial analysis for all other items. .

  Here, regarding the result output timing of the re-analysis analysis of the item TS_A which is the highest priority item, the result output timing 406 when the conventional technique is applied and the result output timing 408 when the technique of the present embodiment is applied are compared. It can be seen that the retest result can be obtained earlier when the technique of this embodiment is applied.

  In addition, with respect to the result output timing of the item TS_D, which is the final output item among the items TS_B, TS_C, and TS_D analyzed as the “group A” 213, the result output timing 407 when the conventional technology is applied and the technology of the present embodiment. When compared with the result output timing 409 when applied, it can be seen that the retest result can be obtained earlier when the technique of the present embodiment is applied. In this embodiment, two types of “groups” for performing the re-examination analysis collectively are shown, but any number of “groups” may be used if necessary.

  FIG. 5 shows a conventional technique for immediately re-analyzing an analysis item to which a data alarm described in Patent Document 2 is added, and a case where automatic re-inspection is performed in units of priorities specified in advance as in the technique of this embodiment. The difference in the amount of dummy suction is shown. In FIG. 5, the left side shows the prior art, and the right side shows the present embodiment.

  Fig. 5 requests 8 analysis items (TS_A, TS_B, TS_C, TS_D, TS_E, TS_F, TS_G, TS_H) for 2 specimens, adds a data alarm to all measurement results, and executes automatic retest It is assumed that The reaction time for each analysis item is 10 minutes for TS_A, 9 minutes for TS_B, 8 minutes for TS_C, 7 minutes for TS_D, 6 minutes for TS_E, 5 minutes for TS_F, 4 minutes for TS_G, and 3 minutes for TS_H. is there. In addition, the analysis is performed in order from the analysis item with the longer reaction time. The specimen aspirating operation is performed every 10 seconds.

  First, the case where the prior art is applied will be described. In this case, for the first sample, the samples are aspirated in the order of TS_A, TS_B, TS_C, TS_D, TS_E, TS_F, TS_G, and TS_H as the first analysis. The dummy suction of the sample 1 is executed at the time of sample suction for TS_A located at the head of the analysis schedule. Following the analysis on the sample 1, the initial analysis on the second sample is executed. Similarly to the first sample, the second sample is aspirated in the order of TS_A, TS_B, TS_C, TS_D, TS_E, TS_F, TS_G, and TS_H. The dummy suction of the sample 2 is executed at the time of sample suction for TS_A located at the head of the analysis schedule.

  Thereafter, the measurement result of each analysis item is output, and the retest analysis of each analysis item is scheduled and executed. However, in the case of FIG. 5, since the measurement results of the first sample and the second sample are output alternately, in the case of the prior art, the retest analysis is performed on the analysis item of the first sample. And re-analysis of the analysis item of the second sample are alternately performed. That is, it is necessary to discharge the specimen remaining in the probe after the analysis is completed and to clean the probe each time. As a result, in the case of the prior art, dummy aspiration is performed every time re-examination is performed on each analysis item, and the sample remaining on the probe is discarded after the re-examination is completed.

  On the other hand, in the case of the processing procedure in the present embodiment, the retest analysis is scheduled based on the retest priority. In the case of FIG. 5, the re-examination priority of TS_A and TS_B is “item”, the re-examination priority of TS_C and TS_D is “group A”, and the re-examination priority of TS_E and TS_F is “group B”. Assume that the retest priority of other analysis items is “sample”.

In the case of the example as well, the sample aspiration during the initial analysis is the same as in the prior art. Therefore, also in the embodiment, the dummy suction is executed only in the case of TS_A that is the head of the analysis schedule of the first sample and the second sample.

  Next, the operation at the time of re-analysis for the embodiment will be described. In the embodiment, the re-examination priority of TS_A and TS_B is “item”. Therefore, the TS_A and TS_B re-examination schedule is the order of TS_A of the first sample, TS_A of the second sample, TS_B of the first sample, and TS_B of the second sample. In this case, since the sample changes every time, dummy suction is executed every time the re-analysis is performed.

  Subsequently, the output result of the first analysis of the first specimen TS_C, the output result of the first analysis of the second specimen, the output result of the first analysis of the first specimen TS_D, and the first analysis of the second specimen In this embodiment, since the retest priority of TS_C of the first sample is “group A”, the output result of the initial analysis for TS_D of the same sample is obtained. At this point, TS_C and TS_D retests for the first specimen are scheduled. For this reason, the dummy suction of the first specimen is executed only at the time of TS_C suction. Retesting of TS_C and TS_D for the second sample is performed in the same manner, and dummy suction of the first sample is performed only during TS_C suction. As a result, the number of dummy suctions is halved.

  Subsequently, for TS_E and TS_F whose re-examination priority is set to “group B”, re-examination of TS_E and TS_F is scheduled when the output result of the initial analysis of TS_F is obtained. As a result, dummy aspiration is performed only when the first specimen is aspirated for TS_E. The re-examination operation of TS_E and TS_F for the second specimen is the same.

  Next, for TS_G and TS_H whose retest priority is set to “sample”, retesting of TS_G and TS_H is scheduled when the output result of the initial analysis of TS_H is obtained. As a result, dummy aspiration is executed only when the first specimen is aspirated for TS_G. The TS_G and TS_H retest operations for the second sample are the same.

[Summary]
As described above, using the automatic analyzer according to the present embodiment, when all the initial measurement results of the inspection items having the same priority are output (without waiting for the end of the initial measurement results of other inspection items), Since the re-inspection analysis of the inspection item is automatically executed, the re-inspection analysis of the analysis item having a high priority can be preferentially executed. In addition, when the automatic analyzer according to the present embodiment is used, the number of times of dummy aspiration is reduced because the number of sample changes is less than that in the prior art, and the amount of sample consumed is reduced accordingly. For this reason, it is possible to achieve a good balance between the execution of automatic re-examination of analysis items with high priority and the suppression of sample consumption.

[Example 2]
[Device configuration]
FIG. 6 shows an apparatus configuration of an automatic analyzer 600 according to the present embodiment. In FIG. 6, parts corresponding to those in FIG. The difference between the apparatus configuration of the present embodiment and the apparatus configuration described in Embodiment 1 (FIG. 1) is that the retest work table 601 is stored in the storage device 136.

[Analysis parameter setting screen example]
FIG. 7 shows an analysis parameter setting screen 700 used in this embodiment. In FIG. 7, parts corresponding to those in FIG. The difference is the priority setting field 710 of the various conditions input field 202. The automatic reexamination priority setting field 710 is also provided with an automatic reexamination check box 711. When the check box 711 is checked, it is possible to input the priority of automatic reexamination. In this embodiment, the priority is selected from “high” 713, “medium” 714, “low” 715, and “none” 716.

  When an analysis item for which “high” 713 is selected needs to be reexamined after outputting the measurement result of the initial analysis, the reexamination analysis is immediately executed for each item.

  The analysis item for which “medium” 714 is selected waits for another result to be output for one minute after the output of the measurement result of the initial analysis, and the re-examination analysis is performed on the items output during that time.

  The analysis item for which “low” 715 is selected waits for another result to be output for 3 minutes after the output of the measurement result of the initial analysis, and the re-examination analysis is performed on the items output during that time. The waiting time described here may differ depending on the automatic analyzer, or may be variably set by the user.

  For the analysis item for which “None” 716 is selected, the retest analysis is executed after the measurement results of the first analysis of all the analysis items requested to be analyzed for the same sample are output.

[Processing Procedure in Example 2]
FIG. 8 shows a flowchart of a processing procedure executed after the measurement result of the first analysis is output. The processing procedure is executed according to a program installed in the computer main body 134 on the operation unit 130 side. The same processing may be executed by the computer main body 111 on the analysis unit 110 side.

(Step S811)
When the measurement result of the first analysis is output, the computer main body 134 stores the measurement result in the measurement result storage table 1362.

(Step S812)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether it is necessary to re-examine the output measurement result. If reexamination is necessary, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S813. On the other hand, if re-examination is not necessary, the computer main body 134 returns to a state of waiting for output of another measurement result.

(Step S813)
In this step, the computer main body 134 stores the reexamination items in the reexamination work table 601. The reexamination work table 601 is a work table for temporarily storing items that require reexamination analysis in units of samples.

(Step S814)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether or not the re-examination priority of the output measurement result is the “high” item. If the item is “high”, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S815. On the other hand, if the item is not “high”, the computer main unit proceeds to step S816.

(Step S815)
In this step, the computer main body 134 sets “exist” to “re-examination waiting time presence / absence”, and sets 0 seconds to “re-examination waiting time”. Here, “re-examination waiting time presence / absence” is information indicating whether or not “re-examination waiting time” has been set. “Retest waiting time” is “wait time until retesting” set for each sample. The “retest remaining waiting time” is subtracted as time elapses, and the retest analysis of the measurement results output until the waiting time reaches zero seconds is collectively performed.

  Note that the “retest waiting time” differs depending on the retest priority. In this embodiment, when the retest priority is “high”, the “retest waiting time” is 0 seconds and “medium” is set. In the item, “retest waiting time” is set to 1 minute, and in the “low” item, “retest waiting time” is set to 3 minutes. “The retest waiting time always gives priority to a short time. For example, it is assumed that the measurement result of the item whose retest priority is“ low ”is output and“ retest remaining waiting time ”is set to 3 minutes. When 30 seconds have elapsed from the setting, the “retest remaining waiting time” is 2 minutes 30 seconds. After that, when the measurement result for the item with “retest priority” set to “medium” is output, the waiting time to be set for the item with “retest priority” set to “medium” and the current “retest remaining wait time” Is compared with 2 minutes and 30 seconds set to "." In this case, the “retest remaining waiting time” is updated to one minute with the shorter time. As described above, the “retest remaining waiting time” is always updated to a shorter time, and the retest timing can be matched with the retest timing of the item having a higher priority.

(Step S816)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether or not the re-examination priority of the output measurement result is the “medium” item. If the item is “medium”, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S817. On the other hand, if the item is not “medium”, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S821.

(Step S817)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether or not “existence of re-examination waiting time” is “present”. In the case of “None”, the computer main body 134 proceeds to Step S819. On the other hand, if “Yes”, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S818.

(Step S818)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether the “retest remaining waiting time” is longer than one minute. When the “retest remaining waiting time” is longer than 1 minute, the computer main body 134 proceeds to step S820. On the other hand, if the “retest remaining waiting time” is shorter than 1 minute, the computer main body 134 proceeds to step S824.

(Step S819)
In this step, the computer main body 134 sets “present” to “re-examination waiting time presence / absence”, and proceeds to the next step S820.

(Step S820)
In this step, the computer main body 134 sets 1 minute to the “retest remaining waiting time”, and then proceeds to step S824.

(Step S821)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether or not the re-examination priority of the output measurement result is the “low” item. If the item is “low”, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S822. On the other hand, if the item is not “low”, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S824.

(Step S822)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether or not “existence of re-examination waiting time” is “present”. In the case of “none”, the computer main body 134 proceeds to step S823. If “present”, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S824.

(Step S823)
In this step, the computer main body 134 sets “exist” to “re-examination waiting time presence / absence” and sets “re-examination waiting time” to 3 minutes.

(Step S824)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether or not the measurement results of all items have been output. If the measurement results for all items have been output, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S825. On the other hand, when the measurement results of all items are not output, the computer main body 134 returns to a state of waiting for the output of another measurement result.

(Step S825)
In this step, the computer main unit 134 sets “exist” to “re-examination waiting time presence / absence” and sets “seconds for remaining re-examination” to 0 second.

  FIG. 9 shows the re-analysis analysis allocation process. In the case of the present embodiment, the re-analysis analysis assignment process is executed at regular intervals.

(Step S911)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether or not “existence of re-examination waiting time” is “present”. If “Yes”, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to Step 912. On the other hand, if it is “none”, the computer main body 134 returns to a state of waiting for the next execution timing.

(Step S912)
In this step, the computer main body 134 subtracts the elapsed time from the “retest waiting time”.

(Step S913)
In this step, the computer main body 134 determines whether or not the “retest waiting time” is 0 second. If it is 0 seconds, the computer main unit 134 proceeds to step S914. On the other hand, if it is not 0 seconds, the computer main body 134 returns to a state of waiting for the next execution timing.

(Step S914)
In this step, the computer main body 134 sets the retest item registered in the retest work table 601 to “measurement request information for each sample”.

(Step S915)
In this step, the computer main body 134 stores “sample measurement request information” in the analysis allocation waiting table 1361.

[Retest timing]
FIG. 10 shows the retest timing in the second embodiment. Note that the re-examination priority of TS_A, TS_B, TS_E, TS_F, TS_G, and TS_H are all “low” items, and the re-examination priority of TS_C and TS_D are all “medium” items. The output order of the measurement results of each item is TS_A, TS_B, TS_C, TS_D, TS_E, TS_F, TS_G, TS_H, and the output interval of the measurement results of each item is every 30 seconds. In addition, the case where a data alarm requiring re-examination is added to all items will be verified.

  First, when the measurement result of TS_A is output, the computer main body 134 confirms that the re-examination priority of TS_A is an item of “low”. At this time, the computer main body 134 sets “3 minutes” 1001 to the “retest remaining waiting time”. This “re-examination remaining waiting time” decreases as time elapses, and the re-examination analysis is collectively performed on the measurement results output before the timing of “0 seconds”. Therefore, the re-examination analysis is performed collectively on the measurement results output up to timing 1002.

  In this example, the measurement result of TS_B is output 30 seconds after the measurement result of TS_A is output. When the TS_B measurement result is output, the timer for managing the “retest remaining waiting time” is “2 minutes 30 seconds”. In this example, since the re-examination priority of TS_B is the “low” item (that is, the re-examination waiting time is 3 minutes), the “re-examination waiting time” remains “2 minutes 30 seconds”.

  When 30 seconds have passed, the measurement result of TS_C is output. At this time, the “retest remaining waiting time” is “2 minutes”, but the retest priority of TS_C is the “medium” item. For this reason, “1 minute” 1003 is set in the “retest remaining waiting time”. Until this time, the items output up to timing 1002 were subject to re-analysis, but the “re-examination waiting time” was updated to “1 minute”, so the items output up to timing 1004 It will be subject to re-examination analysis.

  When 30 seconds have passed, the measurement result of TS_D is output. The re-examination priority of TS_D is the “medium” item, but “re-examination remaining waiting time” has already been updated to “30 seconds”, so “re-examination remaining waiting time” remains “30 seconds”.

  When 30 seconds elapses, the “retest remaining waiting time” becomes “0 seconds”, so re-analysis for the items 1005 (TS_A, TS_B, TS_C, TS_D) for which the measurement results have been output up to this point is collectively performed. To do.

  For the items TS_E, TS_F, TS_G, and TS_H that are output thereafter, the re-analysis analysis is performed on the measurement results that are output until the “re-examination waiting time” set according to the same rule becomes “0 seconds”. Run.

[Summary]
As described above, when the automatic analyzer according to the present embodiment is used, it is possible to wait for the output of measurement results of a plurality of items within a predetermined time, and to re-analyze the plurality of items preferentially. By re-analyzing a plurality of items together, it is possible to reduce the number of dummy aspirations of the sample, reduce the consumption of the sample, and re-examine the re-examination items with high priority.

[Example 3]
Subsequently, a preferred embodiment 3 in combination with the above-described embodiment will be described. Note that the apparatus configuration of the automatic analyzer according to the present embodiment may be any of the first and second embodiments described above. However, the automatic analyzer according to the present embodiment is equipped with a function for setting the analysis order so that the initial analysis is continuously performed on items belonging to the same group in the reexamination priority.

[Analysis order of initial analysis]
FIG. 11 shows a comparison result of how the retest timing changes when the conventional technique is applied to the determination of the analysis order of the first analysis and when the technique is applied to the present embodiment. The upper part of FIG. 11 corresponds to the case where the conventional technique is applied, and the lower part corresponds to the case where the technique of the present embodiment is applied.

  When the conventional technique is applied, the initial analysis is performed from items with long reaction times so that the timing at which all measurement results are output is the shortest time for all analysis items requested for each sample. Here, the reaction time of each analysis item is 10 minutes for TS_A, 9 minutes for TS_B, 8 minutes for TS_C, 7 minutes for TS_D, 6 minutes for TS_E, and 5 minutes for TS_F. The analysis order of the initial analysis is TS_A, TS_B, TS_C, TS_D, TS_E, and TS_F in the order of longer reaction time.

  On the other hand, in the case of this embodiment, when the re-examination priority of TS_D and TS_F is “Group A” and all other items are “Sample”, the analysis order of the initial analysis is first set to “Re-examination priority”. The analysis ranks of TS_D and TS_F for which “Group A” is set are high, and the analysis ranks of other analysis items are low.

  Here, regarding the output timing of the measurement result of TS_D, when the timing 1101 when the technology of the present embodiment is applied is compared with the timing 1101 when the technology of the conventional technology is applied, the direction when the technology of the present embodiment is applied is compared. Similarly, the measurement result is output earlier, and the output result of the TS_F measurement result is output earlier when the inventive technique is applied. For this reason, the re-examination analysis can be started earlier in the present embodiment than in the prior art.

[Summary]
As described above, when the automatic analyzer according to the present embodiment is used, the initial analysis of the analysis item having a high retest priority is executed earlier than the conventional technique, so the retest analysis is performed on the analysis item having a high retest priority. The timing can be advanced.

[Other examples]
The present invention is not limited to the configuration of the embodiment described above, and includes various modifications. For example, in order to explain the present invention in an easy-to-understand manner, some of the above-described embodiments are described in detail for some embodiments, and it is not necessary to include all the configurations described. Moreover, it is possible to replace a part of a certain form example with the structure of another form example, and it is also possible to add the structure of another form example to the structure of a certain form example. It is also possible to add another configuration to the configuration of each embodiment, replace a partial configuration of each embodiment with another configuration, or delete a partial configuration of each embodiment.

  Moreover, you may implement | achieve some or all of each structure, a function, a process part, a process means, etc. which were mentioned above as an integrated circuit or other hardware, for example. Each of the above-described configurations, functions, and the like may be realized by a processor interpreting and executing a program that realizes each function. That is, each configuration may be realized by software. In this case, information such as programs, tables, and files for realizing each function can be stored in a memory, a hard disk, a storage device such as an SSD (Solid State Drive), or a storage medium such as an IC card, an SD card, or a DVD. .

  Control lines and information lines indicate what is considered necessary for the description, and do not represent all control lines and information lines necessary for the product. In practice, it can be considered that almost all components are connected to each other.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 100 ... Automatic analyzer 136 ... Memory | storage device 1361 ... Analysis allocation waiting table 1362 ... Measurement result storage table 200 ... Analysis parameter setting screen 210 ... Automatic reexamination priority setting column 211 ... Automatic reexamination check box 213 ... Automatic reexamination priority Radio button 214 ... Automatic reexamination priority radio button 215 ... Automatic reexamination priority radio button 216 ... Automatic reexamination priority radio button 600 ... Automatic analysis device 601 ... Reexamination work table 700 ... Analysis parameter setting screen 710 ... Automatic Re-examination priority setting field 711 ... Automatic re-examination check box 713 ... Automatic re-examination priority radio button 714 ... Automatic re-examination priority radio button 715 ... Automatic re-examination priority radio button 716 ... Automatic re-examination priority radio button

Claims (7)

A sample disk holding a plurality of sample containers into which a sample has been injected, a reaction disk holding a plurality of reaction containers, a reagent disk holding a plurality of reagent containers into which a reagent has been injected, and a sample in the sample container A sample dispensing mechanism for dispensing into the reaction container; and a reagent dispensing mechanism for dispensing the reagent in the reagent container into the reaction container; and an analysis unit that performs qualitative or quantitative analysis of the sample;
A first storage device for storing a table storing measurement results of the analysis unit;
A second storage device for storing information on the necessity of re-examination analysis set for each inspection item, and information on re-examination priority referenced at the time of automatic re-examination scheduling;
The control unit controls the initial analysis of the sample by the analysis unit, and controls the re-examination analysis for an item to which an alarm is attached to the result of the initial analysis. A control unit that schedules the re-examination analysis for the analysis items having the same re-examination priority at a timing when all the measurement results are output. The automatic analyzer according to claim 1,
The control unit has a function of displaying a user interface screen including a first interface that accepts the necessity of the re-examination analysis and a second interface that accepts the re-examination priority. . The automatic analyzer according to claim 2,
The second interface for accepting designation of the retest priority includes an item for designating a group for designating a set of analysis items for performing the retest analysis collectively from the same sample, and an analysis for performing the retest analysis collectively. An automatic analyzer characterized by including an item for designating a sample requiring only the same sample as an item. The automatic analyzer according to claim 1,
The control unit schedules an initial analysis with respect to analysis items of the same sample for which the same retest priority is set in descending order of priority among the retest priorities. A sample disk holding a plurality of sample containers into which a sample has been injected, a reaction disk holding a plurality of reaction containers, a reagent disk holding a plurality of reagent containers into which a reagent has been injected, and a sample in the sample container A sample dispensing mechanism for dispensing into the reaction container; and a reagent dispensing mechanism for dispensing the reagent in the reagent container into the reaction container; and an analysis unit that performs qualitative or quantitative analysis of the sample;
A first storage device for storing a table storing measurement results of the analysis unit;
A second storage device for storing information on the necessity of re-examination analysis set for each inspection item, and information on re-examination priority referenced at the time of automatic re-examination scheduling;
The control unit controls the initial analysis of the sample by the analysis unit, and controls the re-analysis of the item to which an alarm is attached to the result of the initial analysis, and outputs the analysis result for each analysis item Each time, the re-examination waiting time of the re-examination priority set for the analysis item is read and compared with the remaining re-examination waiting time, and when the re-examination waiting time is shorter than the remaining re-examination waiting time, The waiting time value is updated to the retest waiting time value. If the retest waiting time is longer than the remaining retest waiting time, the remaining retest waiting time is not updated, and the remaining retest waiting time becomes zero. Control unit that schedules the re-analysis of the analysis items for which the measurement results are output until the remaining re-examination waiting time becomes zero at the same time Automatic analyzer with. The automatic analyzer according to claim 5,
The control unit has a function of displaying a user interface screen including a first interface that accepts the necessity of the re-examination analysis and a second interface that accepts the re-examination priority. . The automatic analyzer according to claim 6,
The second interface that accepts the designation of the retest priority includes a designation item for setting the retest waiting time longer as the retest priority rank is lower, and the retest waiting time as the retest priority rank is higher. An automatic analyzer characterized by including designated items to be set short.

Images