Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

EP2845985B1 - Système de sécurisation de porte - Google Patents

Système de sécurisation de porte Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2845985B1
EP2845985B1 EP13003615.5A EP13003615A EP2845985B1 EP 2845985 B1 EP2845985 B1 EP 2845985B1 EP 13003615 A EP13003615 A EP 13003615A EP 2845985 B1 EP2845985 B1 EP 2845985B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
gate
signal
designed
safety system
edge
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP13003615.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2845985A1 (fr
Inventor
Jan Giger
Bernd Kagerer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Cedes AG
Fraba AG
Original Assignee
Cedes AG
Fraba AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Cedes AG, Fraba AG filed Critical Cedes AG
Priority to DK13003615.5T priority Critical patent/DK2845985T3/en
Priority to EP13003615.5A priority patent/EP2845985B1/fr
Publication of EP2845985A1 publication Critical patent/EP2845985A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2845985B1 publication Critical patent/EP2845985B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06—DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06B—FIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B9/00—Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
    • E06B9/56—Operating, guiding or securing devices or arrangements for roll-type closures; Spring drums; Tape drums; Counterweighting arrangements therefor
    • E06B9/80—Safety measures against dropping or unauthorised opening; Braking or immobilising devices; Devices for limiting unrolling
    • E06B9/82—Safety measures against dropping or unauthorised opening; Braking or immobilising devices; Devices for limiting unrolling automatic
    • E06B9/88—Safety measures against dropping or unauthorised opening; Braking or immobilising devices; Devices for limiting unrolling automatic for limiting unrolling
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05F—DEVICES FOR MOVING WINGS INTO OPEN OR CLOSED POSITION; CHECKS FOR WINGS; WING FITTINGS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, CONCERNED WITH THE FUNCTIONING OF THE WING
    • E05F15/00—Power-operated mechanisms for wings
    • E05F15/40—Safety devices, e.g. detection of obstructions or end positions
    • E05F15/42—Detection using safety edges
    • E05F15/43—Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05F—DEVICES FOR MOVING WINGS INTO OPEN OR CLOSED POSITION; CHECKS FOR WINGS; WING FITTINGS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, CONCERNED WITH THE FUNCTIONING OF THE WING
    • E05F15/00—Power-operated mechanisms for wings
    • E05F15/40—Safety devices, e.g. detection of obstructions or end positions
    • E05F15/42—Detection using safety edges
    • E05F15/43—Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound
    • E05F2015/434—Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound with cameras or optical sensors
    • E05F2015/435—Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound with cameras or optical sensors by interruption of the beam
    • E05F2015/436—Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound with cameras or optical sensors by interruption of the beam the beam being parallel to the wing edge
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05Y—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES E05D AND E05F, RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, ELECTRIC CONTROL, POWER SUPPLY, POWER SIGNAL OR TRANSMISSION, USER INTERFACES, MOUNTING OR COUPLING, DETAILS, ACCESSORIES, AUXILIARY OPERATIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, APPLICATION THEREOF
    • E05Y2900/00—Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05Y—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES E05D AND E05F, RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, ELECTRIC CONTROL, POWER SUPPLY, POWER SIGNAL OR TRANSMISSION, USER INTERFACES, MOUNTING OR COUPLING, DETAILS, ACCESSORIES, AUXILIARY OPERATIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, APPLICATION THEREOF
    • E05Y2900/00—Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof
    • E05Y2900/10—Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof for buildings or parts thereof
    • E05Y2900/106—Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof for buildings or parts thereof for garages
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06—DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06B—FIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B9/00—Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
    • E06B9/56—Operating, guiding or securing devices or arrangements for roll-type closures; Spring drums; Tape drums; Counterweighting arrangements therefor
    • E06B9/68—Operating devices or mechanisms, e.g. with electric drive
    • E06B2009/6809—Control
    • E06B2009/6818—Control using sensors
    • E06B2009/6827—Control using sensors sensing light
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06—DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06B—FIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B9/00—Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
    • E06B9/56—Operating, guiding or securing devices or arrangements for roll-type closures; Spring drums; Tape drums; Counterweighting arrangements therefor
    • E06B9/68—Operating devices or mechanisms, e.g. with electric drive
    • E06B2009/6809—Control
    • E06B2009/6872—Control using counters to determine shutter position

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a Torêtssystem with a light grid arrangement for the detection of objects in the plane of movement of the gate and the gate edge wherein the security system between gate and object.
  • Tornells of the type mentioned are known from the prior art. These usually form a grid of light barriers within the plane of movement of the door and transversely to the direction of movement of the leading gate edge.
  • the photoelectric barriers are formed by a transmitter strip and a receiver strip which are provided opposite each other for mounting on or in the guide of the gate edge, so that the gate interrupts the photoelectric barriers successively when closing.
  • the known Torommessysteme offer a method with which a distinction can be made between the detection of an object or the gate edge.
  • the 2011 filed patent application EP 2 586 959 A1 CEDES AG describes a Torzzissystem in which the pattern detected by the receiver bar is statically compared with predefined patterns in order to be able to immediately distinguish between object and gate edge even after a failure and restart of the Torinerungssystems.
  • the 2011 filed patent application EP 2 506 034 A1 CEDES AG describes a Torellesssystem, in which the light grid is formed of distance sensors and is distinguished on the basis of the detected distance between the object and the door edge.
  • a disadvantage is the aforementioned Torommessystemen with the exception of CEDES EP 2 229 496 B1 and the CEDES EP 2 506 034 A1 in that the tamper-evident system can be manipulated by inserting a narrow object, such as a rod or an arm, below the gate edge in the path of the gate in such a way that it interrupts only the photocell closest to the gate edge.
  • a narrow object such as a rod or an arm
  • the torching system usually recognizes this as a door edge and not as an object. As a result, the object can be damaged and squeezed in particular by the completely closing gate on the ground.
  • the inventive gate securing system serves to protect a gate with a gate edge slidably leading in a plane of movement and in a movement direction against collision with an object and comprises a light grid direction with at least 2 transmitting elements and at least 2 Receiving elements for the formation of light barrier beams in the plane of motion for detecting an object in the plane of movement and the gate edge and further comprises an evaluation device which is adapted to distinguish due to the detection of the light grid device between the object or gate edge and to generate a security signal upon detection of an object and further comprises a position sensor device which is formed separately from the light grid device for detecting a position of the gate and for outputting a position signal which corresponds to a position range of the gate edge, wherein the evaluation device is further adapted to generate a check signal due to the interruption of a particular light barrier beam of the light grid device and wherein there is further provided a control device which is designed to carry out a plausibility check as a function of the position signal and the checking signal gnal and generate a safety signal depending on the plaus
  • the Torzzissystem can have the advantage that when an incorrect distinction of the evaluation that incorrectly assigns the gate edge instead of an object as a cause and therefore incorrectly generates no security signal in an incorrect detection of the light grid device, the Torommessystem still responds safely because now instead of the evaluation, the control device can generate the safety signal.
  • the safety of the door safety system can be increased.
  • the position signal may preferably be a value from a range of values.
  • the check signal may preferably be associated with the position of a light grid steel.
  • the evaluation device can preferably generate an associated characteristic checking signal, which is assigned to the respective positions of the light grating bars, in each case for a plurality of light grid beams when interrupted
  • the evaluation device is adapted to generate due to the interruption of a particular light barrier beam of the light grid device, a verification signal which is associated with the particular Licht-enstrahl characteristically and a position range of the gate edge on the line of the particular Licht-enstrahls or between the particular Licht 2enstrahl and the closed position of the door corresponds and Furthermore, the control device is designed to transmit the safety signal generate when the position signal corresponding position range is outside the position corresponding to the check signal position range
  • the particular light barrier should be interrupted by the gate edge or, if the gate body also breaks the light barrier beams in the plane of movement, by the subsequent gate leaves. Then, the position signal should reflect a position of the gate edge at the particular light barrier beam or between the particular light barrier and the closed position of the door. If this is not the case, then there is an unsafe condition of the gate, so that a safety signal is ore eugt.
  • the door bodies In sectional doors, the door bodies usually have sectional sections of a certain depth, which usually interrupt the light barrier beams. In the case of film doors, the door body usually has a thin film which usually does not interrupt the light barrier beams.
  • the position sensor device preferably comprises a rotary encoder and / or one or more end-zone switches.
  • the efficiency of the Torschssystems can be increased.
  • Rotary encoders can be mounted on the drive shaft of the gate and determine the position of the gate edge by means of the unwinding rotation of the gate.
  • End-of-range switches can act as a cam or curve on the gate edge or the gate body on a switch on the door guide and thus determine the position or a position range of the gate edge.
  • the Torellesssystem further comprises a control device in particular for position-dependent control of the speed of movement of the door and / or in particular for the position-dependent deactivation of a hose edge safety at the gate edge.
  • the position sensor device is designed to pass signals to at least one further control device, in particular for position-dependent control of the speed of movement of the door and / or in particular for the position-dependent deactivation of a hose edge safety device at the gate edge.
  • the position-dependent speed control may allow about a deceleration before the closing position.
  • the Torommessystem can have the advantage that it increases the comfort for the user.
  • the evaluation device is connected to the light grid device by a common carrier, in particular by a common housing.
  • the control device is connected to the drive control of the door or also connected to the light grid device by a common carrier, in particular by a common housing.
  • a common carrier or housing can facilitate assembly and increase ruggedness.
  • the Torellesssystem can facilitate the assembly and / or increase the robustness against wear.
  • the light grid arrangement is formed so that the particular light barrier beam is disposed at a height between 2 cm and 30 cm, in particular between 5 cm and 20 cm, in particular between 10 cm and 15 cm above the ground.
  • a low location of the particular beam of light beam can reduce the risk of crushing.
  • the lowest light beam beam is not selected so that a slowing down of the gate is still possible.
  • the Torellesssystem can reduce the risk of crushing.
  • the position sensor device is designed such that the output of the position signal takes place when detecting the gate about +/- 20 cm, in particular about +/- 10 cm, in particular about +/- 5 cm, in particular about +/- 1 cm, in particular exactly at the position of the gate when the gate edge enters the specific light barrier.
  • the position sensor device is preferably designed so that the output of the position signal takes place during a certain period of time after which the door has reached a specific position.
  • the range tolerant output of the position signal may increase the stability of the plausibility check.
  • the Torschssystem can increase the system stability.
  • the position sensor device is configured to record the position of the gate associated with a position signal by a learning run of the gate, wherein in particular the one or more check signals are used to detect and / or store the position of the gate,
  • the gate can close approximately from top to bottom and when passing and interrupting the or the particular light beam beams, the or the corresponding verification signals are passed to the control device that connects them in their memory with the or simultaneously incoming position signals.
  • the position signals can represent values from a value range that corresponds to the travel path of the gate.
  • the Torellesssystem and / or the evaluation device and / or the control device is adapted to stop the gate when the safety signal generated and / or reverse.
  • the inventive gate comprises a Torschssystem invention of the aforementioned type.
  • the inventive gate can have the advantages of Torschssystems.
  • Fig. 1 shows a gate 1 with a Torellesssystem 2 with a End Schlschalter 3 on which a cam curve 4 acts.
  • the cam operates the end range switch when the gate edge 5 is in an area between the particular light barrier beam 6 and the ground.
  • a light grid device 7 consists of a transmitter strip 8 with transmitters 9 and a receiver strip 10 with receivers 11 assigned in parallel.
  • the light barrier beams 12 are interrupted by the gate, the specific light barrier beam 6 is interrupted by an object and the light barrier beam 13 is not interrupted.
  • the receivers are connected by a connection 14 to the evaluation device 15, which is located in the housing 16 of the light grid device 7.
  • the evaluation device is connected to the motor controller 17 via a connection 18 via which a security signal can be sent.
  • the receiver 19 of the specific light barrier beam 6 is connected to the control device 21 via a connection 20.
  • the end range switch 3 is connected to the control device 21 via a connection 22.
  • the control device 21 is connected to the motor controller 17 and can also transmit this to a safety signal.
  • the motor controller 17 is connected to the motor 23 which drives the door 1 by rolling or rolling over the shaft 24. The motor control stops and reverses the rolling motor in case of a safety signal.
  • the object 25 interrupts the determined light beam beam 6. This leads to the detection by the associated receiver 19 and to the generation of a specific light beam beam associated with the verification signal which is transmitted via the connection 20 to the control device.
  • the End Schlsschalter 3 is not yet switched by the cam curve 4 of the gate. This circuit state of a position of the gate edge 5 even before the specific light barrier beam 6 and is transmitted as a position signal to the control device 21.
  • the control device has the position corresponding to the check signal and the position range corresponding to the position signal stored in the memory. The control device now compares the check signal with the position signal for plausibility as to whether the position range corresponding to the check signal lies within the position range of the position signal.
  • Fig. 2 shows the gate 1 with a Torellesssystem 2 with a rotary encoder 26 which is connected to the control device 21.
  • the rotary encoder detects the rotation of the shaft 24 and transmits the rotation to the control device.
  • the control unit calculates the position of the gate and the gate edge from the rotational values. The position corresponding to the gate edge on the particular beam steel 6 is entered or taught the control device.
  • the other structure and mode of action correspond FIG. 1 ,

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)

Claims (10)

  1. Système de sécurisation de portail
    - destiné à sécuriser un portail contre une collision avec un objet, le portail comprenant un rebord de portail antérieur mobile dans un plan de mouvement et dans une direction de mouvement, comportant
    - un dispositif à grille lumineuse
    - pourvu d'au moins 2 éléments émetteurs et d'au moins 2 éléments récepteurs
    - destiné à la formation de faisceaux d'une barrière lumineuse dans le plan de mouvement
    - destiné à la détection d'un objet dans le plan de mouvement et au niveau du rebord de portail ;
    - un dispositif d'évaluation conçu pour,
    - sur la base de la détection du dispositif à grille lumineuse,
    - faire la distinction entre un objet et le rebord du portail
    - et, lorsqu'un objet est détecté, pour produire un signal de sécurité ;
    - un dispositif de capteurs de position
    - qui est conçu séparément du dispositif à grille lumineuse
    - pour détecter une position du portail et
    - pour délivrer un signal de position
    - qui correspond à une zone de position du rebord du portail,
    caractérisé en ce que
    - le dispositif d'évaluation est conçu en outre
    - pour produire un signal de vérification sur la base de l'interruption d'un certain faisceau de barrière lumineuse du dispositif à grille lumineuse et
    - un dispositif de contrôle est présent et conçu pour
    - mettre en oeuvre un contrôle de plausibilité en fonction du signal de position et du signal de vérification
    - et pour produire un signal de sécurité en fonction du contrôle de plausibilité.
  2. Système de sécurisation de portail selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que
    - le dispositif d'évaluation est conçu
    - pour produire un signal de vérification sur la base de l'interruption d'un certain faisceau de barrière lumineuse du dispositif à grille lumineuse, lequel signal de vérification est associé de manière caractéristique au certain faisceau de barrière lumineuse et correspond à une zone de position du rebord du portail sur la ligne du certain faisceau de barrière lumineuse ou entre le certain faisceau de barrière lumineuse et la position fermée du portail, et/ou en ce que
    - le dispositif de contrôle est conçu
    - pour produire le signal de sécurité
    - lorsque la zone de position correspondant au signal de position se situe à l'extérieur de la zone de position correspondant au signal de vérification.
  3. Système de sécurisation de portail selon l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    - le dispositif de capteur de position
    - comprend un résolveur et/ou
    - un ou plusieurs commutateurs de zone d'extrémité.
  4. Système de sécurisation de portail selon l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    - le système de sécurisation de portail comprend un autre dispositif de commande
    - en particulier pour commander la vitesse de déplacement du portail en fonction de la position, et/ou
    - en particulier pour désactiver une sécurisation de rebord tubulaire placée sur le rebord du portail, en fonction de la position, et/ou
    - le dispositif de capteur de position est conçu
    - pour transmettre des signaux à au moins un autre dispositif de commande
    - en particulier pour commander la vitesse de déplacement du portail, en fonction de la position, et/ou
    - en particulier pour désactiver une sécurisation de rebord tubulaire sur le rebord du portail, en fonction de la position.
  5. Système de sécurisation de portail selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes
    caractérisé en ce que
    - le dispositif d'évaluation
    - est relié au dispositif à grille lumineuse par un support commun, et est en particulier entouré par un boîtier commun, et/ou
    - le dispositif de contrôle
    - est relié à la commande d'entraînement du portail par un support commun, et est en particulier entouré par un boîtier commun ou
    - est également relié au dispositif à grille lumineuse par un support commun, et est en particulier entouré par un boîtier commun.
  6. Système de sécurisation de portail selon l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    - le dispositif à grille lumineuse est conçu de sorte que
    - le certain faisceau de barrière lumineuse est disposé à une hauteur comprise entre 2 cm et 30 cm au-dessus du sol, en particulier entre 5 cm et 20 cm, en particulier entre 10 cm et 15 cm.
  7. Système de sécurisation de portail selon l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    - le dispositif de capteur de position est conçu de sorte que
    - le signal de position est émis lorsque le portail est détectée à environ ± 20 cm de la position du portail lorsque le rebord du portail pénètre dans la certaine barrière lumineuse, en particulier à environ ± 10 cm, en particulier à environ ± 5 cm, en particulier à environ ± 1 cm, en particulier précisément dans la position du portail lorsque le rebord du portail pénètre dans la certaine barrière lumineuse, et/ou en ce que
    - le signal de position est émis pendant une certaine durée après que le portail a atteint une certaine position.
  8. Système de sécurisation de portail selon l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    - le dispositif de capteur de position est conçu
    - pour enregistrer la position du portail associée à un signal de position à l'aide d'une course d'apprentissage du portail,
    - en particulier le signal ou les signaux de vérification étant utilisés pour détecter et/ou mettre en mémoire la position du portail.
  9. Système de sécurisation de portail selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    - le système de sécurisation de portail et/ou le dispositif d'évaluation et/ou le dispositif de contrôle sont conçus
    - pour arrêter le portail et/ou pour renverser la marche de celui-ci lorsque le signal de sécurité est produit.
  10. Portail comprenant un système de sécurisation de portail selon l'une des revendications précédentes
EP13003615.5A 2013-07-18 2013-07-18 Système de sécurisation de porte Active EP2845985B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DK13003615.5T DK2845985T3 (en) 2013-07-18 2013-07-18 Port Security System
EP13003615.5A EP2845985B1 (fr) 2013-07-18 2013-07-18 Système de sécurisation de porte

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP13003615.5A EP2845985B1 (fr) 2013-07-18 2013-07-18 Système de sécurisation de porte

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2845985A1 EP2845985A1 (fr) 2015-03-11
EP2845985B1 true EP2845985B1 (fr) 2015-11-18

Family

ID=48875463

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13003615.5A Active EP2845985B1 (fr) 2013-07-18 2013-07-18 Système de sécurisation de porte

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2845985B1 (fr)
DK (1) DK2845985T3 (fr)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3530869B1 (fr) 2018-02-27 2020-04-15 Cedes AG Barriere lumineuse comportant des informations de distance et son utilisation
FR3101911B1 (fr) * 2019-10-09 2021-10-01 Sofineco Soc Pour Letude Et Le Financement Dentreprises Industrielles Et Commerciales Barre palpeuse virtuelle pour porte de manutention

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19739543A1 (de) 1997-09-09 1999-03-11 Efaflex Inzeniring D O O Ljubl Sicherheitseinrichtung für motorisch angetriebene Tore
DE102005003794A1 (de) 2005-01-26 2006-08-03 Cedes Ag Vorrichtung zur Absicherung eines angetriebenen Bewegungselements
DE102008023294B4 (de) 2008-01-16 2010-02-04 Cedes Ag Sicherungssystem zur Absicherung eines sich bewegenden, geführten Bewegungselements gegen ungewollte Kollisionen
DE102010017398B3 (de) * 2010-06-16 2011-12-01 Feig Electronic Gmbh Verfahren zum Betrieb eines Tores sowie Vorrichtung zum Betrieb eines Tores
DK2506034T3 (da) 2011-04-01 2013-09-02 Cedes Ag Sensorindretning, sikkerhedsindretning, dør og fremgangsmåde til kontrol af bevægelsen
EP2586959B2 (fr) 2011-10-28 2016-09-14 Cedes AG Dispositif de sécurisation, dispositif de fermeture et unité d'évaluation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2845985A1 (fr) 2015-03-11
DK2845985T3 (en) 2016-02-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2586959B2 (fr) Dispositif de sécurisation, dispositif de fermeture et unité d'évaluation
EP2506034B1 (fr) Dispositif de capteur, dispositif de sécurité, porte et procédé de contrôle du mouvement
DE3618692C2 (fr)
EP1089030B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de contrôle d'une zone de protection
EP2574718B1 (fr) Système de sécurité pour la sécurisation d'un élément mobile guidé, en déplacement, contre des collisions involontaires
EP1841942B1 (fr) Dispositif pour sécuriser un élément mobile entraîné
EP2404859B1 (fr) Dispositif de surveillance pour sécuriser un élément entraîné
DE4201971A1 (de) Verdunkelungsvorrichtung
DE19739544A1 (de) Sicherheitseinrichtung für motorisch angetriebene Systeme
EP1972751A2 (fr) Dispositif de surveillance pour une porte motorisée
WO2016116178A1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'un système de porte ainsi que système de porte et dispositif de sécurité correspondant
DE102008044990A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ansteuerung und/oder Überwachung eines motorisch angetriebenen Flügels während der Öffnungsphase
EP3584400A1 (fr) Porte de protection et procédé de fonctionnement d'une porte de protection
DE102006008513A1 (de) Sensor-Überwachungseinrichtung
EP2306063B1 (fr) Capteur de sécurité
DE102007033766A1 (de) Lichtgitter
DE10228930B4 (de) Sensorvorrichtung für eine automatische Drehtüranlage
DE102014111694A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Überwachung einer Maschinenbewegung und Verfahren zum Überwachen einer Maschinenbewegung
EP2845985B1 (fr) Système de sécurisation de porte
EP2799384A1 (fr) Porte motorisée dotée d'un dispositif de sécurité
EP3660251A1 (fr) Dispositif de protection, en particulier portail industriel
DE102013212518A1 (de) Automatische Fenster- oder Türanlage
EP3074583B1 (fr) Procédé d'entrainement de porte industrielle avec dispositif de détection de force
DE60201287T2 (de) Motorisierter Rolladen mit Vorrichtung zum Abschalten eines Motorantriebes bei Erkennung eines Hindernisses
EP2634358B1 (fr) Détection d'obstacles intelligente

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130808

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: E06B 9/88 20060101ALI20150608BHEP

Ipc: E06B 9/68 20060101AFI20150608BHEP

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: CEDES AG

Owner name: FRABA AG

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150715

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 761680

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20151215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502013001467

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

Effective date: 20160222

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20160218

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160318

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160218

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160318

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160219

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: KELLER AND PARTNER PATENTANWAELTE AG, CH

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502013001467

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160819

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160801

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20170331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160718

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20170718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20130718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 761680

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180718

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PFA

Owner name: CEDES AG, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: CEDES AG, DE

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230519

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20230801

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240719

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20240722

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20240801

Year of fee payment: 12