EP2845985B1 - Gate securing system - Google Patents
Gate securing system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2845985B1 EP2845985B1 EP13003615.5A EP13003615A EP2845985B1 EP 2845985 B1 EP2845985 B1 EP 2845985B1 EP 13003615 A EP13003615 A EP 13003615A EP 2845985 B1 EP2845985 B1 EP 2845985B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- gate
- signal
- designed
- safety system
- edge
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 claims description 34
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000009849 deactivation Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims 3
- 230000001012 protector Effects 0.000 claims 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 101150087426 Gnal gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010408 film Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E06—DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
- E06B—FIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
- E06B9/00—Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
- E06B9/56—Operating, guiding or securing devices or arrangements for roll-type closures; Spring drums; Tape drums; Counterweighting arrangements therefor
- E06B9/80—Safety measures against dropping or unauthorised opening; Braking or immobilising devices; Devices for limiting unrolling
- E06B9/82—Safety measures against dropping or unauthorised opening; Braking or immobilising devices; Devices for limiting unrolling automatic
- E06B9/88—Safety measures against dropping or unauthorised opening; Braking or immobilising devices; Devices for limiting unrolling automatic for limiting unrolling
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05F—DEVICES FOR MOVING WINGS INTO OPEN OR CLOSED POSITION; CHECKS FOR WINGS; WING FITTINGS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, CONCERNED WITH THE FUNCTIONING OF THE WING
- E05F15/00—Power-operated mechanisms for wings
- E05F15/40—Safety devices, e.g. detection of obstructions or end positions
- E05F15/42—Detection using safety edges
- E05F15/43—Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05F—DEVICES FOR MOVING WINGS INTO OPEN OR CLOSED POSITION; CHECKS FOR WINGS; WING FITTINGS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, CONCERNED WITH THE FUNCTIONING OF THE WING
- E05F15/00—Power-operated mechanisms for wings
- E05F15/40—Safety devices, e.g. detection of obstructions or end positions
- E05F15/42—Detection using safety edges
- E05F15/43—Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound
- E05F2015/434—Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound with cameras or optical sensors
- E05F2015/435—Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound with cameras or optical sensors by interruption of the beam
- E05F2015/436—Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound with cameras or optical sensors by interruption of the beam the beam being parallel to the wing edge
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05Y—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES E05D AND E05F, RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, ELECTRIC CONTROL, POWER SUPPLY, POWER SIGNAL OR TRANSMISSION, USER INTERFACES, MOUNTING OR COUPLING, DETAILS, ACCESSORIES, AUXILIARY OPERATIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, APPLICATION THEREOF
- E05Y2900/00—Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05Y—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES E05D AND E05F, RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, ELECTRIC CONTROL, POWER SUPPLY, POWER SIGNAL OR TRANSMISSION, USER INTERFACES, MOUNTING OR COUPLING, DETAILS, ACCESSORIES, AUXILIARY OPERATIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, APPLICATION THEREOF
- E05Y2900/00—Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof
- E05Y2900/10—Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof for buildings or parts thereof
- E05Y2900/106—Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof for buildings or parts thereof for garages
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E06—DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
- E06B—FIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
- E06B9/00—Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
- E06B9/56—Operating, guiding or securing devices or arrangements for roll-type closures; Spring drums; Tape drums; Counterweighting arrangements therefor
- E06B9/68—Operating devices or mechanisms, e.g. with electric drive
- E06B2009/6809—Control
- E06B2009/6818—Control using sensors
- E06B2009/6827—Control using sensors sensing light
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E06—DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
- E06B—FIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
- E06B9/00—Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
- E06B9/56—Operating, guiding or securing devices or arrangements for roll-type closures; Spring drums; Tape drums; Counterweighting arrangements therefor
- E06B9/68—Operating devices or mechanisms, e.g. with electric drive
- E06B2009/6809—Control
- E06B2009/6872—Control using counters to determine shutter position
Definitions
- the invention relates to a Torêtssystem with a light grid arrangement for the detection of objects in the plane of movement of the gate and the gate edge wherein the security system between gate and object.
- Tornells of the type mentioned are known from the prior art. These usually form a grid of light barriers within the plane of movement of the door and transversely to the direction of movement of the leading gate edge.
- the photoelectric barriers are formed by a transmitter strip and a receiver strip which are provided opposite each other for mounting on or in the guide of the gate edge, so that the gate interrupts the photoelectric barriers successively when closing.
- the known Torommessysteme offer a method with which a distinction can be made between the detection of an object or the gate edge.
- the 2011 filed patent application EP 2 586 959 A1 CEDES AG describes a Torzzissystem in which the pattern detected by the receiver bar is statically compared with predefined patterns in order to be able to immediately distinguish between object and gate edge even after a failure and restart of the Torinerungssystems.
- the 2011 filed patent application EP 2 506 034 A1 CEDES AG describes a Torellesssystem, in which the light grid is formed of distance sensors and is distinguished on the basis of the detected distance between the object and the door edge.
- a disadvantage is the aforementioned Torommessystemen with the exception of CEDES EP 2 229 496 B1 and the CEDES EP 2 506 034 A1 in that the tamper-evident system can be manipulated by inserting a narrow object, such as a rod or an arm, below the gate edge in the path of the gate in such a way that it interrupts only the photocell closest to the gate edge.
- a narrow object such as a rod or an arm
- the torching system usually recognizes this as a door edge and not as an object. As a result, the object can be damaged and squeezed in particular by the completely closing gate on the ground.
- the inventive gate securing system serves to protect a gate with a gate edge slidably leading in a plane of movement and in a movement direction against collision with an object and comprises a light grid direction with at least 2 transmitting elements and at least 2 Receiving elements for the formation of light barrier beams in the plane of motion for detecting an object in the plane of movement and the gate edge and further comprises an evaluation device which is adapted to distinguish due to the detection of the light grid device between the object or gate edge and to generate a security signal upon detection of an object and further comprises a position sensor device which is formed separately from the light grid device for detecting a position of the gate and for outputting a position signal which corresponds to a position range of the gate edge, wherein the evaluation device is further adapted to generate a check signal due to the interruption of a particular light barrier beam of the light grid device and wherein there is further provided a control device which is designed to carry out a plausibility check as a function of the position signal and the checking signal gnal and generate a safety signal depending on the plaus
- the Torzzissystem can have the advantage that when an incorrect distinction of the evaluation that incorrectly assigns the gate edge instead of an object as a cause and therefore incorrectly generates no security signal in an incorrect detection of the light grid device, the Torommessystem still responds safely because now instead of the evaluation, the control device can generate the safety signal.
- the safety of the door safety system can be increased.
- the position signal may preferably be a value from a range of values.
- the check signal may preferably be associated with the position of a light grid steel.
- the evaluation device can preferably generate an associated characteristic checking signal, which is assigned to the respective positions of the light grating bars, in each case for a plurality of light grid beams when interrupted
- the evaluation device is adapted to generate due to the interruption of a particular light barrier beam of the light grid device, a verification signal which is associated with the particular Licht-enstrahl characteristically and a position range of the gate edge on the line of the particular Licht-enstrahls or between the particular Licht 2enstrahl and the closed position of the door corresponds and Furthermore, the control device is designed to transmit the safety signal generate when the position signal corresponding position range is outside the position corresponding to the check signal position range
- the particular light barrier should be interrupted by the gate edge or, if the gate body also breaks the light barrier beams in the plane of movement, by the subsequent gate leaves. Then, the position signal should reflect a position of the gate edge at the particular light barrier beam or between the particular light barrier and the closed position of the door. If this is not the case, then there is an unsafe condition of the gate, so that a safety signal is ore eugt.
- the door bodies In sectional doors, the door bodies usually have sectional sections of a certain depth, which usually interrupt the light barrier beams. In the case of film doors, the door body usually has a thin film which usually does not interrupt the light barrier beams.
- the position sensor device preferably comprises a rotary encoder and / or one or more end-zone switches.
- the efficiency of the Torschssystems can be increased.
- Rotary encoders can be mounted on the drive shaft of the gate and determine the position of the gate edge by means of the unwinding rotation of the gate.
- End-of-range switches can act as a cam or curve on the gate edge or the gate body on a switch on the door guide and thus determine the position or a position range of the gate edge.
- the Torellesssystem further comprises a control device in particular for position-dependent control of the speed of movement of the door and / or in particular for the position-dependent deactivation of a hose edge safety at the gate edge.
- the position sensor device is designed to pass signals to at least one further control device, in particular for position-dependent control of the speed of movement of the door and / or in particular for the position-dependent deactivation of a hose edge safety device at the gate edge.
- the position-dependent speed control may allow about a deceleration before the closing position.
- the Torommessystem can have the advantage that it increases the comfort for the user.
- the evaluation device is connected to the light grid device by a common carrier, in particular by a common housing.
- the control device is connected to the drive control of the door or also connected to the light grid device by a common carrier, in particular by a common housing.
- a common carrier or housing can facilitate assembly and increase ruggedness.
- the Torellesssystem can facilitate the assembly and / or increase the robustness against wear.
- the light grid arrangement is formed so that the particular light barrier beam is disposed at a height between 2 cm and 30 cm, in particular between 5 cm and 20 cm, in particular between 10 cm and 15 cm above the ground.
- a low location of the particular beam of light beam can reduce the risk of crushing.
- the lowest light beam beam is not selected so that a slowing down of the gate is still possible.
- the Torellesssystem can reduce the risk of crushing.
- the position sensor device is designed such that the output of the position signal takes place when detecting the gate about +/- 20 cm, in particular about +/- 10 cm, in particular about +/- 5 cm, in particular about +/- 1 cm, in particular exactly at the position of the gate when the gate edge enters the specific light barrier.
- the position sensor device is preferably designed so that the output of the position signal takes place during a certain period of time after which the door has reached a specific position.
- the range tolerant output of the position signal may increase the stability of the plausibility check.
- the Torschssystem can increase the system stability.
- the position sensor device is configured to record the position of the gate associated with a position signal by a learning run of the gate, wherein in particular the one or more check signals are used to detect and / or store the position of the gate,
- the gate can close approximately from top to bottom and when passing and interrupting the or the particular light beam beams, the or the corresponding verification signals are passed to the control device that connects them in their memory with the or simultaneously incoming position signals.
- the position signals can represent values from a value range that corresponds to the travel path of the gate.
- the Torellesssystem and / or the evaluation device and / or the control device is adapted to stop the gate when the safety signal generated and / or reverse.
- the inventive gate comprises a Torschssystem invention of the aforementioned type.
- the inventive gate can have the advantages of Torschssystems.
- Fig. 1 shows a gate 1 with a Torellesssystem 2 with a End Schlschalter 3 on which a cam curve 4 acts.
- the cam operates the end range switch when the gate edge 5 is in an area between the particular light barrier beam 6 and the ground.
- a light grid device 7 consists of a transmitter strip 8 with transmitters 9 and a receiver strip 10 with receivers 11 assigned in parallel.
- the light barrier beams 12 are interrupted by the gate, the specific light barrier beam 6 is interrupted by an object and the light barrier beam 13 is not interrupted.
- the receivers are connected by a connection 14 to the evaluation device 15, which is located in the housing 16 of the light grid device 7.
- the evaluation device is connected to the motor controller 17 via a connection 18 via which a security signal can be sent.
- the receiver 19 of the specific light barrier beam 6 is connected to the control device 21 via a connection 20.
- the end range switch 3 is connected to the control device 21 via a connection 22.
- the control device 21 is connected to the motor controller 17 and can also transmit this to a safety signal.
- the motor controller 17 is connected to the motor 23 which drives the door 1 by rolling or rolling over the shaft 24. The motor control stops and reverses the rolling motor in case of a safety signal.
- the object 25 interrupts the determined light beam beam 6. This leads to the detection by the associated receiver 19 and to the generation of a specific light beam beam associated with the verification signal which is transmitted via the connection 20 to the control device.
- the End Schlsschalter 3 is not yet switched by the cam curve 4 of the gate. This circuit state of a position of the gate edge 5 even before the specific light barrier beam 6 and is transmitted as a position signal to the control device 21.
- the control device has the position corresponding to the check signal and the position range corresponding to the position signal stored in the memory. The control device now compares the check signal with the position signal for plausibility as to whether the position range corresponding to the check signal lies within the position range of the position signal.
- Fig. 2 shows the gate 1 with a Torellesssystem 2 with a rotary encoder 26 which is connected to the control device 21.
- the rotary encoder detects the rotation of the shaft 24 and transmits the rotation to the control device.
- the control unit calculates the position of the gate and the gate edge from the rotational values. The position corresponding to the gate edge on the particular beam steel 6 is entered or taught the control device.
- the other structure and mode of action correspond FIG. 1 ,
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein Torsicherungssystem mit einer Lichtgitteranordnung zur Detektion von Objekten in der Bewegungsebene des Tors und der Torkante wobei das Sicherungssystem zwischen Tor und Objekt unterscheidet.The invention relates to a Torsicherungssystem with a light grid arrangement for the detection of objects in the plane of movement of the gate and the gate edge wherein the security system between gate and object.
Aus dem Stand der Technik sind Torsicherungssysteme der genannten Art bekannt. Diese bilden üblicherweise ein Gitter aus Lichtschranken innerhalb der Bewegungsebene des Tors und quer zur Bewegungsrichtung der vorlaufenden Torkante aus. Im Allgemeinen werden die Lichtschranken durch eine Senderleiste und eine Empfängerleiste gebildet welche gegenüberliegend jeweils zur Montage an oder in der Führung der Torkante vorgesehen sind, sodass das Tor beim Schliessen die Lichtschranken nacheinander unterbricht. Dazu bieten die bekannten Torsicherungssysteme ein Verfahren an, mit dem zwischen der Detektion eines Objekts oder der Torkante unterschieden werden kann.Torsicherungsysteme of the type mentioned are known from the prior art. These usually form a grid of light barriers within the plane of movement of the door and transversely to the direction of movement of the leading gate edge. In general, the photoelectric barriers are formed by a transmitter strip and a receiver strip which are provided opposite each other for mounting on or in the guide of the gate edge, so that the gate interrupts the photoelectric barriers successively when closing. For this purpose, the known Torsicherungssysteme offer a method with which a distinction can be made between the detection of an object or the gate edge.
Das 1998 angemeldete Patent
Das 2006 angemeldete Patent
Das 2009 angemeldete Patent
Die 2011 angemeldete Patentanmeldung
Die 2011 angemeldete Patentanmeldung
Nachteilig ist den genannten Torsicherungssystemen mit Ausnahme der CEDES
Es ist Aufgabe der Erfindung ein verbessertes Torsicherungssystem bereit zu stellen.It is an object of the invention to provide an improved Torsicherungssystem ready.
Diese Aufgabe wird, ausgehend von Torsicherungssystemen der eingangs genannten Art, durch ein Torsicherungssystem nach Anspruch 1 und ein Tor nach Anspruch 10 gelöst. Vorteilhafte Ausgestaltungen sind in den weiteren abhängigen Ansprüchen angegeben.This object is achieved on the basis of Torsicherungssystems of the type mentioned by a Torsicherungssystem according to claim 1 and a door according to
Das erfindungsgemässe Torsicherungssystem dient zur Absicherung eines Tors mit einer in einer Bewegungsebene und in einer Bewegungsrichtung verschiebbar vorlaufenden Torkante gegen Kollision mit einem Objekt und umfasst eine Lichtgittereimichtung mit mindestens 2 Sendeelementen und mit mindestens 2 Empfangselementen zur Ausbildung von Lichtschrankenstrahlen in der Bewegungsebene zur Detektion eines Objekts in der Bewegungsebene und der Torkante und umfasst des Weiteren eine Auswerteeinrichtung, die dazu ausgebildet ist aufgrund der Detektion der Lichtgittereinrichtung zwischen Objekt oder Torkante zu unterscheiden und bei Detektion eines Objekts ein Sicherheitssignal zu erzeugen und umfasst des Weiteren eine Positionssensoreinrichtung die getrennt von der Lichtgittereinrichtung ausgebildet ist zur Detektion einer Position des Tors und zur Ausgabe eines Positionssignals das einem Positionsbereich der Torkante entspricht wobei die Auswerteeinrichtung weiterhin dazu ausgebildet ist, aufgrund der Unterbrechung eines bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahls der Lichtgittereinrichtung ein Überprüfungssignal zu erzeugen und wobei des Weiteren eine Kontrolleinrichtung vorhanden ist, die dazu ausgebildet ist, eine Plausibilitätsprüfung in Abhängigkeit von Positionssignal und Überprüfungssignal durchzuführen und in Abhängigkeit von der Plausibilitätsprüfung ein Sicherheitssignal zu erzeugen.The inventive gate securing system serves to protect a gate with a gate edge slidably leading in a plane of movement and in a movement direction against collision with an object and comprises a light grid direction with at least 2 transmitting elements and at least 2 Receiving elements for the formation of light barrier beams in the plane of motion for detecting an object in the plane of movement and the gate edge and further comprises an evaluation device which is adapted to distinguish due to the detection of the light grid device between the object or gate edge and to generate a security signal upon detection of an object and further comprises a position sensor device which is formed separately from the light grid device for detecting a position of the gate and for outputting a position signal which corresponds to a position range of the gate edge, wherein the evaluation device is further adapted to generate a check signal due to the interruption of a particular light barrier beam of the light grid device and wherein there is further provided a control device which is designed to carry out a plausibility check as a function of the position signal and the checking signal gnal and generate a safety signal depending on the plausibility check.
Das Torsicherungssystem kann den Vorteil haben, dass bei einer unkorrekten Unterscheidung der Auswerteeinrichtung, die einer Detektion der Lichtgittereinrichtung unkorrekter Weise die Torkante anstatt ein Objekt als Ursache zuordnet und daher unkorrekt kein Sicherheitssignal erzeugt, das Torsicherungssystem dennoch sicher reagiert, da nun anstatt der Auswerteeinrichtung die Kontrolleinrichtung das Sicherheitssignal erzeugen kann. Die Sicherheit des Torsicherheitssystems kann erhöht werden.The Torsicherungssystem can have the advantage that when an incorrect distinction of the evaluation that incorrectly assigns the gate edge instead of an object as a cause and therefore incorrectly generates no security signal in an incorrect detection of the light grid device, the Torsicherungssystem still responds safely because now instead of the evaluation, the control device can generate the safety signal. The safety of the door safety system can be increased.
Das Positionssignal kann vorzugsweise ein Wert aus einem Wertebereich sein. Das Überprüfungssignal kann vorzugsweise der Position eines Lichtgitterstahls zugeordnet sein. Die Auswerteeinrichtung kann vorzugsweise mehreren Lichtgitterstrahlen bei Unterbrechung jeweils ein zugeordnetes charakteristisches Überprüfungssignal erzeugen, das den jeweiligen Positionen der Lichtgitterstahlen zugeordnet istThe position signal may preferably be a value from a range of values. The check signal may preferably be associated with the position of a light grid steel. The evaluation device can preferably generate an associated characteristic checking signal, which is assigned to the respective positions of the light grating bars, in each case for a plurality of light grid beams when interrupted
Vorzugsweise ist die Auswerteeinrichtung dazu ausgebildet, aufgrund der Unterbrechung eines bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahls der Lichtgittereinrichtung ein Überprüfungssignal zu erzeugen das dem bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahl charakteristisch zugeordnet ist und einem Positionsbereich der Torkante an der Linie des bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahls oder zwischen dem bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahl und der geschlossen Stellung des Tors entspricht und/oder des Weiteren die Kontrolleinrichtung dazu ausgebildet, das Sicherheitssignal zu erzeugen wenn der dem Positionssignal entsprechende Positionsbereich ausserhalb des dem Überprüfungssignal entsprechenden Positionsbereich liegtPreferably, the evaluation device is adapted to generate due to the interruption of a particular light barrier beam of the light grid device, a verification signal which is associated with the particular Lichtschrankenstrahl characteristically and a position range of the gate edge on the line of the particular Lichtschrankenstrahls or between the particular Lichtschrankenstrahl and the closed position of the door corresponds and Furthermore, the control device is designed to transmit the safety signal generate when the position signal corresponding position range is outside the position corresponding to the check signal position range
Wenn das Überprüfungssignal erzeugt ist, sollte die bestimmte Lichtschranke von der Torkante oder, falls der Torkörper ebenfalls die Lichtschrankenstrahlen in der Bewegungsebene unterbrechen von den nachfolgenden Torblättem unterbrochen sein. Dann sollte das Positionssignal eine Position der Torkante an dem bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahl oder zwischen der bestimmten Lichtschranke und der geschlossen Stellung des Tors wiedergeben. Ist dem nicht so, so liegt ein unsicherer Zustand des Tors vor, sodass ein Sicherheitssignal erz eugt wird.When the verification signal is generated, the particular light barrier should be interrupted by the gate edge or, if the gate body also breaks the light barrier beams in the plane of movement, by the subsequent gate leaves. Then, the position signal should reflect a position of the gate edge at the particular light barrier beam or between the particular light barrier and the closed position of the door. If this is not the case, then there is an unsafe condition of the gate, so that a safety signal is ore eugt.
Bei Sektionaltoren weisen der Torkörper üblicherweise Sektionalabschnitte von gewisser Tiefe auf, die die Lichtschrankenstrahlen üblicherweise unterbrechen. Bei Folientoren weist der Torkörper üblicherweise eine dünne Folie auf, die die Lichtschrankenstrahlen üblicherweise nicht unterbrechen.In sectional doors, the door bodies usually have sectional sections of a certain depth, which usually interrupt the light barrier beams. In the case of film doors, the door body usually has a thin film which usually does not interrupt the light barrier beams.
Vorzugsweise umfasst die Positionssensoreinrichtung einen Drehgeber und/oder einen oder mehrere Endbereichsschalter.The position sensor device preferably comprises a rotary encoder and / or one or more end-zone switches.
Dies kann den Vorteil haben, dass die Positionssensoreinrichtung mehrfach Verwendung findet. Die Wirtschaftlichkeit des Torsicherungssystems kann erhöht werden.This can have the advantage that the position sensor device is used repeatedly. The efficiency of the Torsicherungssystems can be increased.
Drehgeber können an der Antriebswelle des Tors angebracht sein und über die Abrolldrehung des Tores die Position der Torkante bestimmen.Rotary encoders can be mounted on the drive shaft of the gate and determine the position of the gate edge by means of the unwinding rotation of the gate.
Endbereichsschalter können als Nocke oder Kurve auf der Torkante oder dem Torkörper an einen Schalter an der Torführung angreifen und so die Position oder einen Positionsbereich der Torkante bestimmen.End-of-range switches can act as a cam or curve on the gate edge or the gate body on a switch on the door guide and thus determine the position or a position range of the gate edge.
Vorzugsweise umfasst das Torsicherungssystem eine weitere Steuereinrichtung insbesondere zur positionsabhängigen Steuerung der Geschwindigkeit der Bewegung des Tors und/oder insbesondere zur positionsabhängigen Deaktivierung einer Schlauchkantensicherung an der Torkante. Vorzugsweise ist die Positionssensoreinrichtung dazu ausgebildet Signale an mindestens eine weitere Steuereinrichtung weiterzugeben insbesondere zur positionsabhängigen Steuerung der Geschwindigkeit der Bewegung des Tors und/oder insbesondere zur positionsabhängigen Deaktivierung einer Schlauchkantensicherung an der Torkante.Preferably, the Torsicherungssystem further comprises a control device in particular for position-dependent control of the speed of movement of the door and / or in particular for the position-dependent deactivation of a hose edge safety at the gate edge. Preferably, the position sensor device is designed to pass signals to at least one further control device, in particular for position-dependent control of the speed of movement of the door and / or in particular for the position-dependent deactivation of a hose edge safety device at the gate edge.
Die positionsabhängige Geschwindigkeitssteuerung kann etwa ein Abbremsen vor der Schliessposition ermöglichen. Das Torsicherungssystem kann den Vorteil haben, dass es den Komfort für den Nutzer erhöht.The position-dependent speed control may allow about a deceleration before the closing position. The Torsicherungssystem can have the advantage that it increases the comfort for the user.
Vorzugsweise ist die Auswerteeinrichtung mit der Lichtgittereinrichtung durch einem gemeinsamen Träger verbunden ist, insbesondere von einem gemeinsamen Gehäuse umfasst. Vorzugsweise ist die Kontrolleinrichtung mit der Antriebssteuerung des Tors oder ebenfalls mit der Lichtgittereinrichtung durch einem gemeinsamen Träger verbunden, insbesondere von einem gemeinsamen Gehäuse umfasst.Preferably, the evaluation device is connected to the light grid device by a common carrier, in particular by a common housing. Preferably, the control device is connected to the drive control of the door or also connected to the light grid device by a common carrier, in particular by a common housing.
Ein gemeinsamer Träger oder Gehäuse kann die Montage erleichtern und die Robustheit erhöhen. Das Torsicherungssystem kann die Montage erleichtern und/oder die Robustheit gegen Verschleiss erhöhen.A common carrier or housing can facilitate assembly and increase ruggedness. The Torsicherungssystem can facilitate the assembly and / or increase the robustness against wear.
Vorzugsweise die Lichtgitteranordnung so ausgebildet, dass der bestimmte Lichtschrankenstrahl in einer Höhe zwischen 2 cm und 30 cm, insbesondere zwischen 5 cm und 20 cm, insbesondere zwischen 10 cm und 15 cm über dem Boden angeordnet ist.Preferably, the light grid arrangement is formed so that the particular light barrier beam is disposed at a height between 2 cm and 30 cm, in particular between 5 cm and 20 cm, in particular between 10 cm and 15 cm above the ground.
Eine niedrige Anordnung des bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahls kann die Gefahr eines Einquetschens vermindern. Vorzugsweise wird nicht der unterste Lichtschrankenstrahl gewählt, damit ein Abbremsen des Tor noch sinnvoll möglich ist. Das Torsicherungssystem kann die Gefahr des Einquetschens verringern.A low location of the particular beam of light beam can reduce the risk of crushing. Preferably, the lowest light beam beam is not selected so that a slowing down of the gate is still possible. The Torsicherungssystem can reduce the risk of crushing.
Vorzugsweise ist die Positionssensoreinrichtung so ausgebildet, dass die Ausgabe des Positionssignals erfolgt bei der Detektion des Tores etwa +/-20 cm, insbesondere etwa +/-10 cm, insbesondere etwa +/-5 cm, insbesondere etwa +/-1 cm, insbesondere genau um die Position des Tores bei Eintritt der Torkante in die bestimmte Lichtschranke. Vorzugsweise ist die Positionssensoreinrichtung so ausgebildet, dass die Ausgabe des Positionssignals während einer bestimmten Zeitdauer erfolgt nach der das Tor eine bestimmte Position erreicht hat.Preferably, the position sensor device is designed such that the output of the position signal takes place when detecting the gate about +/- 20 cm, in particular about +/- 10 cm, in particular about +/- 5 cm, in particular about +/- 1 cm, in particular exactly at the position of the gate when the gate edge enters the specific light barrier. The position sensor device is preferably designed so that the output of the position signal takes place during a certain period of time after which the door has reached a specific position.
Die Bereichstolerante Ausgabe des Positionssignals kann die Stabilität der Plausibilitätsprüfung erhöhen. Das Torsicherungssystem kann die Systemstabilität erhöhen.The range tolerant output of the position signal may increase the stability of the plausibility check. The Torsicherungssystem can increase the system stability.
Vorzugsweise ist die Positionssensoreinrichtung dazu ausgebildet, die einem Positionssignal zugeordnete Position des Tor durch eine Lernfahrt des Tores aufzunehmen, wobei insbesondere das oder die Überprüfungssignale zur Erkennung und/oder Speicherung der Position des Tors herangezogen werden,Preferably, the position sensor device is configured to record the position of the gate associated with a position signal by a learning run of the gate, wherein in particular the one or more check signals are used to detect and / or store the position of the gate,
Dabei kann das Tor sich etwa von oben nach unten schliessen wobei beim Überfahren und Unterbrechen des oder der bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahlen, das oder die entsprechenden Überprüfungssignale an die Kontrolleinrichtung weitergegeben werden, die diese in ihrem Speicher mit dem oder den zeitgleich eingehenden Positionssignalen verbindet. Die Positionssignale können Werte aus einem Wertebereich darstellen, der dem Fahrweg des Tors entspricht.In this case, the gate can close approximately from top to bottom and when passing and interrupting the or the particular light beam beams, the or the corresponding verification signals are passed to the control device that connects them in their memory with the or simultaneously incoming position signals. The position signals can represent values from a value range that corresponds to the travel path of the gate.
Dies kann den Aufwand bei der Inbetriebnahme verringern.This can reduce the effort during commissioning.
Vorzugsweise ist das Torsicherungssystem und/oder die Auswerteeinrichtung und/oder die Kontrolleinrichtung dazu ausgebildet, das Tor bei erzeugtem Sicherheitssignal zu stoppen und/oder zu reversieren.Preferably, the Torsicherungssystem and / or the evaluation device and / or the control device is adapted to stop the gate when the safety signal generated and / or reverse.
Das erfindungsgemässe Tor umfasst ein erfindungsgemässes Torsicherungssystem der vorgenannten Art.The inventive gate comprises a Torsicherungssystem invention of the aforementioned type.
Das erfindungsgemässe Tor kann die Vorteile des Torsicherungssystems aufweisen.The inventive gate can have the advantages of Torsicherungssystems.
Weitere Merkmale der Erfindung sind in den Zeichnungen angegeben.Further features of the invention are indicated in the drawings.
Die jeweils genannten Vorteile können sich auch für Merkmalskombinationen realisieren in deren Zusammenhang sie nicht genannt sind.The advantages mentioned in each case can also be realized for combinations of features in the context of which they are not mentioned.
Ausführungsbeispiele der Erfindung sind in den Zeichnungen dargestellt und werden im Folgenden näher erläutert. Gleiche Bezugszeichen in den einzelnen Figuren bezeichnen dabei einander entsprechende Elemente. Es zeigen
- Fig. 1
- ein Tor mit Torsicherungssystem und Endbereichsschalter und
- Fig. 2
- ein Tor mit Torsicherungssystem und Drehgeber.
- Fig. 1
- a gate with Torsicherungssystem and Endbereichsschalter and
- Fig. 2
- a gate with Torsicherungssystem and rotary encoder.
Das Objekt 25 unterbricht den bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahl 6. Dies führt zur Detektion durch den zugeordneten Empfänger 19 und zur Erzeugung eines dem bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahl zugeordneten Überprüfungssignals das über die Verbindung 20 an die Kontrolleinrichtung übermittelt wird. Der Endbereichsschalter 3 ist noch nicht durch die Nockenkurve 4 des Tors geschalten. Dieser Schaltungszustand einer Position der Torkante 5 noch vor dem bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahl 6 und wird als Positionssignal an die Kontrolleinrichtung 21 übermittelt. Der Kontrolleinrichtung ist die dem Überprüfungssignal entsprechende Position sowie der dem Positionssignal entsprechende Positionsbereich im Speicher hinterlegt. Die Kontrolleinrichtung vergleicht nun das Überprüfungssignal mit dem Positionssignal auf Plausibilität ob der dem Überprüfungssignal entsprechende Positionsbereich innerhalb des Positionsbereichs des Positionssignals liegt. Im vorliegenden Fall ist dies nicht der Fall, da das Objekt 25 und nicht die Torkante den bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahl 6 unterbricht. Weil der dem Positionssignal entsprechende Positionsbereich ausserhalb des dem Überprüfungssignal entsprechenden Positionsbereich liegt erzeugt die Kontrolleinrichtung 21 ein Sicherheitssignal das der Motorsteuerung 17 übermittelt wird, welche den Motor 23 und das Tor 1 stoppt und reversiertThe
Claims (10)
- Gate safety system- for securing a gate with a gate edge, displaceably leading along a movement level and in a movement direction, against collision with an object, comprising- a light grid means- with at least 2 transmission elements and with at least 2 receiver elements- for forming light barrier beams along the movement level- for detecting an object at movement level and the gate edge;- an evaluation means, designed for- based on the detection of the light grid means- differentiating between object or gate edge- and for generating a safety signal when an object is detected;- a position sensor meanscharacterised in that- designed separately from the light grid means- for detecting a position of the gate, and- for issuing a position signal- that equals a position area of the gate edge,- the evaluation means is further designed for- generating a verification signal based on the interruption of a specific light barrier beam of the light grid means, and- in that a control means is provided and designed for- carrying out a plausibility test depending on the position signal and verification signal- and for generating a safety signal depending on the plausibility test.
- Gate safety system according to claim 1, characterised in that- the evaluation means is designed for- generating a monitoring signal based on the interruption of a specific light barrier beam of the light grid means, the same characteristically allocated to the specific light barrier beam and equalling a position area of the gate edge on the line of the specific light barrier beam, or between the specific light barrier beam and the closed position of the gate
and/or in that- the control means is designed for- generating the safety signal- when the position area equalling the position signal lies outside of the position area equalling the monitoring signal. - Gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims, characterised in that- the position sensor means- comprises a rotary encoder and/or- one or more end area switches.
- Gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims, characterised in that- the gate safety system comprises a further controller,- in particular for the position dependent control of the speed of the movement of the gate and/or- in particular for the position dependent deactivation of a hose edge protector at the gate edge and/or- in that the position sensor means is designed for- transmitting signals to at least one further controller,- in particular for the position dependent control of the speed of the movement of the gate and/or- in particular for the position dependent deactivation of a hose edge protector at the gate edge.
- Gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims,
characterised in that- the evaluation means- is connected with the light grid means by a common support, in particular enclosed by a common housing and/or- in that the controller- is connected with the drive controller of the gate by a common support, in particular enclosed by a common housing, or- is also connected with the light grid means by a common support, in particular enclosed by a common housing. - Gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims,
characterised in that- the light grid arrangement is designed in such a way that- the specific light barrier beam is located at a height of between 2 cm and 30 cm, in particular between 5 cm and 20 cm, in particular between 10 cm and 15 cm above the ground. - Gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims,
characterised in that- the position sensor means is designed in such a way that- the issue of the position signal occurs upon detection of the gate at approximately +/-20 cm, in particular approximately +/- 10 cm, in particular approximately +/- 5 cm, in particular approximately +/- 1 cm, in particular exactly at the position of the gate when the gate edge enters the specific light barrier and/or in that- the issue of the position signal occurs during a specific time period, after which the gate has reached a specific position. - Gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims,
characterised in that- the position sensor means is designed in such a way that- the position of the gate allocated to a position signal is recorded by a learning movement of the gate,- whereby the monitoring signal(s) in particular is/are used for detecting and/or storing the position of the gate. - Gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims,
characterised in that- the gate safety system, and/or the evaluation means and/or the controller are designed for- stopping and/or reversing the gate when the safety signal is generated. - Gate with a gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DK13003615.5T DK2845985T3 (en) | 2013-07-18 | 2013-07-18 | Port Security System |
EP13003615.5A EP2845985B1 (en) | 2013-07-18 | 2013-07-18 | Gate securing system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP13003615.5A EP2845985B1 (en) | 2013-07-18 | 2013-07-18 | Gate securing system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2845985A1 EP2845985A1 (en) | 2015-03-11 |
EP2845985B1 true EP2845985B1 (en) | 2015-11-18 |
Family
ID=48875463
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP13003615.5A Active EP2845985B1 (en) | 2013-07-18 | 2013-07-18 | Gate securing system |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2845985B1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK2845985T3 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3530869B1 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2020-04-15 | Cedes AG | Light grid with distance information and use thereof |
FR3101911B1 (en) * | 2019-10-09 | 2021-10-01 | Sofineco Soc Pour Letude Et Le Financement Dentreprises Industrielles Et Commerciales | Virtual safety edge for handling door |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE19739543A1 (en) | 1997-09-09 | 1999-03-11 | Efaflex Inzeniring D O O Ljubl | Safety device for motorized gates |
DE102005003794A1 (en) | 2005-01-26 | 2006-08-03 | Cedes Ag | Gate, e.g. rolling gate, protecting device, has light barriers between which distance transfers another light barrier in measuring state if gate is in path between another two of barriers and before gate reaches former barrier |
DE102008023294B4 (en) | 2008-01-16 | 2010-02-04 | Cedes Ag | Securing system for securing a moving, guided movement element against unwanted collisions |
DE102010017398B3 (en) * | 2010-06-16 | 2011-12-01 | Feig Electronic Gmbh | Method for operating gate i.e. rolling gate in building, involves releasing signals during interruption of light lines of danger area and protection area, respectively, and releasing different action by gate controller based on signals |
DK2506034T3 (en) | 2011-04-01 | 2013-09-02 | Cedes Ag | Sensor device, safety device, door and movement control method |
EP2586959B2 (en) | 2011-10-28 | 2016-09-14 | Cedes AG | Safety device, closing device and evaluation unit |
-
2013
- 2013-07-18 EP EP13003615.5A patent/EP2845985B1/en active Active
- 2013-07-18 DK DK13003615.5T patent/DK2845985T3/en active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2845985A1 (en) | 2015-03-11 |
DK2845985T3 (en) | 2016-02-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2586959B2 (en) | Safety device, closing device and evaluation unit | |
EP2506034B1 (en) | Sensor device, safety device, door and method for controlling its movement | |
DE3618692C2 (en) | ||
EP1089030B1 (en) | Device and method for monitoring a protection zone | |
EP2574718B1 (en) | Safety system for safeguarding a moving, guided motion element against unwanted collisions | |
EP1841942B1 (en) | Device for protecting a driven moving element | |
EP2404859B1 (en) | Monitoring device for securing a driven element | |
DE4201971A1 (en) | DARKENING DEVICE | |
DE19739544A1 (en) | Safety device for motor-driven systems | |
EP1972751A2 (en) | Monitoring system for a motorised door | |
WO2016116178A1 (en) | Method for controlling a gate assembly, such a gate assembly, and safety device therefor | |
DE102008044990A1 (en) | Method for controlling or monitoring drivable wing, particularly in form of rotating wing, sliding door wing, wing of folding door and window, involves projecting predetermined space element or opening wing in monitoring and releasing area | |
EP3584400A1 (en) | Safety door and method for operating a safety door | |
DE102006008513A1 (en) | Sensor-monitoring device for motor driven wing of automatic door, has evaluation circuit provided for control and/or evaluation of detection signal, and sensors with overlapping area with reference to monitoring area | |
EP2306063B1 (en) | Security sensor | |
DE102007033766A1 (en) | light Curtain | |
DE10228930B4 (en) | Sensor device for an automatic revolving door system | |
DE102014111694A1 (en) | Apparatus for monitoring machine motion and method for monitoring machine motion | |
EP2845985B1 (en) | Gate securing system | |
EP2799384A1 (en) | Motor-driven door with a safety device | |
EP3660251A1 (en) | Protective device, especially industrial gate | |
DE102013212518A1 (en) | Automatic window or door system | |
EP3074583B1 (en) | Method for operating an industrial door with a force detection device | |
DE60201287T2 (en) | Motorized roller shutter with device for switching off a motor drive when an obstacle is detected | |
EP2634358B1 (en) | Intelligent obstacle detection |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130808 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: E06B 9/88 20060101ALI20150608BHEP Ipc: E06B 9/68 20060101AFI20150608BHEP |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: CEDES AG Owner name: FRABA AG |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20150715 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 761680 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20151215 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502013001467 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 Effective date: 20160222 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20160218 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160318 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160218 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160318 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160219 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: KELLER AND PARTNER PATENTANWAELTE AG, CH |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502013001467 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20160819 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160801 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20170331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160718 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160718 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20170718 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170718 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20130718 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151118 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 761680 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180718 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180718 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PFA Owner name: CEDES AG, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: CEDES AG, DE |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230519 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20230801 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240719 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20240722 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20240801 Year of fee payment: 12 |