Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

EP2845985B1 - Gate securing system - Google Patents

Gate securing system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2845985B1
EP2845985B1 EP13003615.5A EP13003615A EP2845985B1 EP 2845985 B1 EP2845985 B1 EP 2845985B1 EP 13003615 A EP13003615 A EP 13003615A EP 2845985 B1 EP2845985 B1 EP 2845985B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
gate
signal
designed
safety system
edge
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP13003615.5A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2845985A1 (en
Inventor
Jan Giger
Bernd Kagerer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Cedes AG
Fraba AG
Original Assignee
Cedes AG
Fraba AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Cedes AG, Fraba AG filed Critical Cedes AG
Priority to DK13003615.5T priority Critical patent/DK2845985T3/en
Priority to EP13003615.5A priority patent/EP2845985B1/en
Publication of EP2845985A1 publication Critical patent/EP2845985A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2845985B1 publication Critical patent/EP2845985B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06BFIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B9/00Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
    • E06B9/56Operating, guiding or securing devices or arrangements for roll-type closures; Spring drums; Tape drums; Counterweighting arrangements therefor
    • E06B9/80Safety measures against dropping or unauthorised opening; Braking or immobilising devices; Devices for limiting unrolling
    • E06B9/82Safety measures against dropping or unauthorised opening; Braking or immobilising devices; Devices for limiting unrolling automatic
    • E06B9/88Safety measures against dropping or unauthorised opening; Braking or immobilising devices; Devices for limiting unrolling automatic for limiting unrolling
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05FDEVICES FOR MOVING WINGS INTO OPEN OR CLOSED POSITION; CHECKS FOR WINGS; WING FITTINGS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, CONCERNED WITH THE FUNCTIONING OF THE WING
    • E05F15/00Power-operated mechanisms for wings
    • E05F15/40Safety devices, e.g. detection of obstructions or end positions
    • E05F15/42Detection using safety edges
    • E05F15/43Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05FDEVICES FOR MOVING WINGS INTO OPEN OR CLOSED POSITION; CHECKS FOR WINGS; WING FITTINGS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, CONCERNED WITH THE FUNCTIONING OF THE WING
    • E05F15/00Power-operated mechanisms for wings
    • E05F15/40Safety devices, e.g. detection of obstructions or end positions
    • E05F15/42Detection using safety edges
    • E05F15/43Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound
    • E05F2015/434Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound with cameras or optical sensors
    • E05F2015/435Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound with cameras or optical sensors by interruption of the beam
    • E05F2015/436Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound with cameras or optical sensors by interruption of the beam the beam being parallel to the wing edge
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05YINDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES E05D AND E05F, RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, ELECTRIC CONTROL, POWER SUPPLY, POWER SIGNAL OR TRANSMISSION, USER INTERFACES, MOUNTING OR COUPLING, DETAILS, ACCESSORIES, AUXILIARY OPERATIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, APPLICATION THEREOF
    • E05Y2900/00Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05YINDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES E05D AND E05F, RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, ELECTRIC CONTROL, POWER SUPPLY, POWER SIGNAL OR TRANSMISSION, USER INTERFACES, MOUNTING OR COUPLING, DETAILS, ACCESSORIES, AUXILIARY OPERATIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, APPLICATION THEREOF
    • E05Y2900/00Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof
    • E05Y2900/10Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof for buildings or parts thereof
    • E05Y2900/106Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof for buildings or parts thereof for garages
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06BFIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B9/00Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
    • E06B9/56Operating, guiding or securing devices or arrangements for roll-type closures; Spring drums; Tape drums; Counterweighting arrangements therefor
    • E06B9/68Operating devices or mechanisms, e.g. with electric drive
    • E06B2009/6809Control
    • E06B2009/6818Control using sensors
    • E06B2009/6827Control using sensors sensing light
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06BFIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B9/00Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
    • E06B9/56Operating, guiding or securing devices or arrangements for roll-type closures; Spring drums; Tape drums; Counterweighting arrangements therefor
    • E06B9/68Operating devices or mechanisms, e.g. with electric drive
    • E06B2009/6809Control
    • E06B2009/6872Control using counters to determine shutter position

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a Torêtssystem with a light grid arrangement for the detection of objects in the plane of movement of the gate and the gate edge wherein the security system between gate and object.
  • Tornells of the type mentioned are known from the prior art. These usually form a grid of light barriers within the plane of movement of the door and transversely to the direction of movement of the leading gate edge.
  • the photoelectric barriers are formed by a transmitter strip and a receiver strip which are provided opposite each other for mounting on or in the guide of the gate edge, so that the gate interrupts the photoelectric barriers successively when closing.
  • the known Torommessysteme offer a method with which a distinction can be made between the detection of an object or the gate edge.
  • the 2011 filed patent application EP 2 586 959 A1 CEDES AG describes a Torzzissystem in which the pattern detected by the receiver bar is statically compared with predefined patterns in order to be able to immediately distinguish between object and gate edge even after a failure and restart of the Torinerungssystems.
  • the 2011 filed patent application EP 2 506 034 A1 CEDES AG describes a Torellesssystem, in which the light grid is formed of distance sensors and is distinguished on the basis of the detected distance between the object and the door edge.
  • a disadvantage is the aforementioned Torommessystemen with the exception of CEDES EP 2 229 496 B1 and the CEDES EP 2 506 034 A1 in that the tamper-evident system can be manipulated by inserting a narrow object, such as a rod or an arm, below the gate edge in the path of the gate in such a way that it interrupts only the photocell closest to the gate edge.
  • a narrow object such as a rod or an arm
  • the torching system usually recognizes this as a door edge and not as an object. As a result, the object can be damaged and squeezed in particular by the completely closing gate on the ground.
  • the inventive gate securing system serves to protect a gate with a gate edge slidably leading in a plane of movement and in a movement direction against collision with an object and comprises a light grid direction with at least 2 transmitting elements and at least 2 Receiving elements for the formation of light barrier beams in the plane of motion for detecting an object in the plane of movement and the gate edge and further comprises an evaluation device which is adapted to distinguish due to the detection of the light grid device between the object or gate edge and to generate a security signal upon detection of an object and further comprises a position sensor device which is formed separately from the light grid device for detecting a position of the gate and for outputting a position signal which corresponds to a position range of the gate edge, wherein the evaluation device is further adapted to generate a check signal due to the interruption of a particular light barrier beam of the light grid device and wherein there is further provided a control device which is designed to carry out a plausibility check as a function of the position signal and the checking signal gnal and generate a safety signal depending on the plaus
  • the Torzzissystem can have the advantage that when an incorrect distinction of the evaluation that incorrectly assigns the gate edge instead of an object as a cause and therefore incorrectly generates no security signal in an incorrect detection of the light grid device, the Torommessystem still responds safely because now instead of the evaluation, the control device can generate the safety signal.
  • the safety of the door safety system can be increased.
  • the position signal may preferably be a value from a range of values.
  • the check signal may preferably be associated with the position of a light grid steel.
  • the evaluation device can preferably generate an associated characteristic checking signal, which is assigned to the respective positions of the light grating bars, in each case for a plurality of light grid beams when interrupted
  • the evaluation device is adapted to generate due to the interruption of a particular light barrier beam of the light grid device, a verification signal which is associated with the particular Licht-enstrahl characteristically and a position range of the gate edge on the line of the particular Licht-enstrahls or between the particular Licht 2enstrahl and the closed position of the door corresponds and Furthermore, the control device is designed to transmit the safety signal generate when the position signal corresponding position range is outside the position corresponding to the check signal position range
  • the particular light barrier should be interrupted by the gate edge or, if the gate body also breaks the light barrier beams in the plane of movement, by the subsequent gate leaves. Then, the position signal should reflect a position of the gate edge at the particular light barrier beam or between the particular light barrier and the closed position of the door. If this is not the case, then there is an unsafe condition of the gate, so that a safety signal is ore eugt.
  • the door bodies In sectional doors, the door bodies usually have sectional sections of a certain depth, which usually interrupt the light barrier beams. In the case of film doors, the door body usually has a thin film which usually does not interrupt the light barrier beams.
  • the position sensor device preferably comprises a rotary encoder and / or one or more end-zone switches.
  • the efficiency of the Torschssystems can be increased.
  • Rotary encoders can be mounted on the drive shaft of the gate and determine the position of the gate edge by means of the unwinding rotation of the gate.
  • End-of-range switches can act as a cam or curve on the gate edge or the gate body on a switch on the door guide and thus determine the position or a position range of the gate edge.
  • the Torellesssystem further comprises a control device in particular for position-dependent control of the speed of movement of the door and / or in particular for the position-dependent deactivation of a hose edge safety at the gate edge.
  • the position sensor device is designed to pass signals to at least one further control device, in particular for position-dependent control of the speed of movement of the door and / or in particular for the position-dependent deactivation of a hose edge safety device at the gate edge.
  • the position-dependent speed control may allow about a deceleration before the closing position.
  • the Torommessystem can have the advantage that it increases the comfort for the user.
  • the evaluation device is connected to the light grid device by a common carrier, in particular by a common housing.
  • the control device is connected to the drive control of the door or also connected to the light grid device by a common carrier, in particular by a common housing.
  • a common carrier or housing can facilitate assembly and increase ruggedness.
  • the Torellesssystem can facilitate the assembly and / or increase the robustness against wear.
  • the light grid arrangement is formed so that the particular light barrier beam is disposed at a height between 2 cm and 30 cm, in particular between 5 cm and 20 cm, in particular between 10 cm and 15 cm above the ground.
  • a low location of the particular beam of light beam can reduce the risk of crushing.
  • the lowest light beam beam is not selected so that a slowing down of the gate is still possible.
  • the Torellesssystem can reduce the risk of crushing.
  • the position sensor device is designed such that the output of the position signal takes place when detecting the gate about +/- 20 cm, in particular about +/- 10 cm, in particular about +/- 5 cm, in particular about +/- 1 cm, in particular exactly at the position of the gate when the gate edge enters the specific light barrier.
  • the position sensor device is preferably designed so that the output of the position signal takes place during a certain period of time after which the door has reached a specific position.
  • the range tolerant output of the position signal may increase the stability of the plausibility check.
  • the Torschssystem can increase the system stability.
  • the position sensor device is configured to record the position of the gate associated with a position signal by a learning run of the gate, wherein in particular the one or more check signals are used to detect and / or store the position of the gate,
  • the gate can close approximately from top to bottom and when passing and interrupting the or the particular light beam beams, the or the corresponding verification signals are passed to the control device that connects them in their memory with the or simultaneously incoming position signals.
  • the position signals can represent values from a value range that corresponds to the travel path of the gate.
  • the Torellesssystem and / or the evaluation device and / or the control device is adapted to stop the gate when the safety signal generated and / or reverse.
  • the inventive gate comprises a Torschssystem invention of the aforementioned type.
  • the inventive gate can have the advantages of Torschssystems.
  • Fig. 1 shows a gate 1 with a Torellesssystem 2 with a End Schlschalter 3 on which a cam curve 4 acts.
  • the cam operates the end range switch when the gate edge 5 is in an area between the particular light barrier beam 6 and the ground.
  • a light grid device 7 consists of a transmitter strip 8 with transmitters 9 and a receiver strip 10 with receivers 11 assigned in parallel.
  • the light barrier beams 12 are interrupted by the gate, the specific light barrier beam 6 is interrupted by an object and the light barrier beam 13 is not interrupted.
  • the receivers are connected by a connection 14 to the evaluation device 15, which is located in the housing 16 of the light grid device 7.
  • the evaluation device is connected to the motor controller 17 via a connection 18 via which a security signal can be sent.
  • the receiver 19 of the specific light barrier beam 6 is connected to the control device 21 via a connection 20.
  • the end range switch 3 is connected to the control device 21 via a connection 22.
  • the control device 21 is connected to the motor controller 17 and can also transmit this to a safety signal.
  • the motor controller 17 is connected to the motor 23 which drives the door 1 by rolling or rolling over the shaft 24. The motor control stops and reverses the rolling motor in case of a safety signal.
  • the object 25 interrupts the determined light beam beam 6. This leads to the detection by the associated receiver 19 and to the generation of a specific light beam beam associated with the verification signal which is transmitted via the connection 20 to the control device.
  • the End Schlsschalter 3 is not yet switched by the cam curve 4 of the gate. This circuit state of a position of the gate edge 5 even before the specific light barrier beam 6 and is transmitted as a position signal to the control device 21.
  • the control device has the position corresponding to the check signal and the position range corresponding to the position signal stored in the memory. The control device now compares the check signal with the position signal for plausibility as to whether the position range corresponding to the check signal lies within the position range of the position signal.
  • Fig. 2 shows the gate 1 with a Torellesssystem 2 with a rotary encoder 26 which is connected to the control device 21.
  • the rotary encoder detects the rotation of the shaft 24 and transmits the rotation to the control device.
  • the control unit calculates the position of the gate and the gate edge from the rotational values. The position corresponding to the gate edge on the particular beam steel 6 is entered or taught the control device.
  • the other structure and mode of action correspond FIG. 1 ,

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)

Description

Die Erfindung betrifft ein Torsicherungssystem mit einer Lichtgitteranordnung zur Detektion von Objekten in der Bewegungsebene des Tors und der Torkante wobei das Sicherungssystem zwischen Tor und Objekt unterscheidet.The invention relates to a Torsicherungssystem with a light grid arrangement for the detection of objects in the plane of movement of the gate and the gate edge wherein the security system between gate and object.

Aus dem Stand der Technik sind Torsicherungssysteme der genannten Art bekannt. Diese bilden üblicherweise ein Gitter aus Lichtschranken innerhalb der Bewegungsebene des Tors und quer zur Bewegungsrichtung der vorlaufenden Torkante aus. Im Allgemeinen werden die Lichtschranken durch eine Senderleiste und eine Empfängerleiste gebildet welche gegenüberliegend jeweils zur Montage an oder in der Führung der Torkante vorgesehen sind, sodass das Tor beim Schliessen die Lichtschranken nacheinander unterbricht. Dazu bieten die bekannten Torsicherungssysteme ein Verfahren an, mit dem zwischen der Detektion eines Objekts oder der Torkante unterschieden werden kann.Torsicherungsysteme of the type mentioned are known from the prior art. These usually form a grid of light barriers within the plane of movement of the door and transversely to the direction of movement of the leading gate edge. In general, the photoelectric barriers are formed by a transmitter strip and a receiver strip which are provided opposite each other for mounting on or in the guide of the gate edge, so that the gate interrupts the photoelectric barriers successively when closing. For this purpose, the known Torsicherungssysteme offer a method with which a distinction can be made between the detection of an object or the gate edge.

Das 1998 angemeldete Patent EP 0 902 157 B1 der EFAFLEX Transport und Lagertechnik GmbH beschreibt ein Torsicherungssystem, bei dem den Lichtschranken sequenziell in Bewegungsrichtung drei unterschiedliche Zustände dynamisch in Abhängigkeit von den zuvor zugeordneten Zuständen zugeordnet werden wobei die nächste vor der Torkante liegende Lichtschranke stets deaktiviert ist.The patent filed in 1998 EP 0 902 157 B1 EFAFLEX Transport und Lagertechnik GmbH describes a gate protection system in which the light barriers are assigned three different states sequentially in the direction of movement dynamically as a function of the previously assigned states, whereby the next light barrier located in front of the gate edge is always deactivated.

Das 2006 angemeldete Patent EP 1 841 942 B1 der CEDES AG beschreibt ein Torsicherungssystem, bei dem die nächste von der Torkante zu überfahrende Lichtschranke in Abhängigkeit von der Fahrzeit der Torkante zwischen den Lichtschranken kurzzeitig vor dem Überfahren der Torkante deaktiviert wird, um eine längere Sensitivität für die Objekterkennung zu gewährleisten.The patent filed in 2006 EP 1 841 942 B1 CEDES AG describes a Torsicherungssystem in which the next of the gate edge to be traveled light barrier is deactivated as a function of the travel time of the gate edge between the light barriers shortly before crossing the gate edge, in order to ensure a longer sensitivity for the object detection.

Das 2009 angemeldete Patent EP 2 229 496 B1 der CEDES AG beschreibt ein Torsicherungssystem, bei dem die Empfängerleiste zusätzliche Sendeelemente umfasst, die zusammen mit den Empfangselementen der Empfängerleiste und über einen an der Torkante vorhandenen Reflektor die Lage der Torkante detektieren, um eine Manipulation des Torsicherungssystems sicher auszuschliessen.The patent pending in 2009 EP 2 229 496 B1 CEDES AG describes a Torsicherungssystem in which the receiver bar includes additional transmitting elements, which detect together with the receiving elements of the receiver strip and a reflector provided on the gate edge, the position of the gate edge, in order to safely exclude a manipulation of the Torsicherungssystems.

Die 2011 angemeldete Patentanmeldung EP 2 586 959 A1 der CEDES AG beschreibt ein Torsicherungssystem, bei dem das von der Empfängerleiste detektierte Muster statisch mit vordefinierten Mustern verglichen wird, um auch nach einem Ausfall und Wiederanfahren des Torsicherungssystems sofort zwischen Objekt und Torkante unterscheiden zu können.The 2011 filed patent application EP 2 586 959 A1 CEDES AG describes a Torsicherungssystem in which the pattern detected by the receiver bar is statically compared with predefined patterns in order to be able to immediately distinguish between object and gate edge even after a failure and restart of the Torsicherungungssystems.

Die 2011 angemeldete Patentanmeldung EP 2 506 034 A1 der CEDES AG beschreibt ein Torsicherungssystem, bei dem das Lichtgitter aus Entfernungssensoren gebildet ist und aufgrund der detektierten Entfernung zwischen Objekt und Torkante unterschieden wird.The 2011 filed patent application EP 2 506 034 A1 CEDES AG describes a Torsicherungssystem, in which the light grid is formed of distance sensors and is distinguished on the basis of the detected distance between the object and the door edge.

Nachteilig ist den genannten Torsicherungssystemen mit Ausnahme der CEDES EP 2 229 496 B1 und der CEDES EP 2 506 034 A1 , dass das Torsicherungssystem dadurch manipuliert werden kann, dass ein schmales Objekt, etwa eine Stange oder ein Arm, unterhalb der Torkante so in den Weg des Tores eingebracht wird, dass es nur die der Torkante nächstliegende noch zu überfahrende Lichtschranke unterbricht. Diese Torsicherungssysteme unterscheiden zwischen Torkante und Objekt im Wesentlichen dadurch, dass die von der Torkante bereits unterbrochenen Lichtschranken ebenso wie die der Torkante nächstliegende noch nicht unterbrochene Lichtschranke nicht oder nicht ununterbrochen zur Objektdetektion genutzt wird. Wird dabei das Objekt von der Torkante weg nach unten geführt oder von der Torkante nach unten gedrückt, so erkennt das Torsicherungssystem dieses üblicherweise als Torkante und nicht als Objekt. Dadurch kann das Objekt beschädigt werden und insbesondere vom vollständig schliessenden Tor am Boden gequetscht werden.A disadvantage is the aforementioned Torsicherungssystemen with the exception of CEDES EP 2 229 496 B1 and the CEDES EP 2 506 034 A1 in that the tamper-evident system can be manipulated by inserting a narrow object, such as a rod or an arm, below the gate edge in the path of the gate in such a way that it interrupts only the photocell closest to the gate edge. These Torsicherungssysteme distinguish between gate edge and object essentially by the fact that the light barriers already interrupted by the gate edge as well as the nearest not yet interrupted gate of the gate edge is not or not continuously used for object detection. If the object is guided downwards from the edge of the door or pushed downwards by the edge of the door, the torching system usually recognizes this as a door edge and not as an object. As a result, the object can be damaged and squeezed in particular by the completely closing gate on the ground.

Es ist Aufgabe der Erfindung ein verbessertes Torsicherungssystem bereit zu stellen.It is an object of the invention to provide an improved Torsicherungssystem ready.

Diese Aufgabe wird, ausgehend von Torsicherungssystemen der eingangs genannten Art, durch ein Torsicherungssystem nach Anspruch 1 und ein Tor nach Anspruch 10 gelöst. Vorteilhafte Ausgestaltungen sind in den weiteren abhängigen Ansprüchen angegeben.This object is achieved on the basis of Torsicherungssystems of the type mentioned by a Torsicherungssystem according to claim 1 and a door according to claim 10. Advantageous embodiments are specified in the further dependent claims.

Das erfindungsgemässe Torsicherungssystem dient zur Absicherung eines Tors mit einer in einer Bewegungsebene und in einer Bewegungsrichtung verschiebbar vorlaufenden Torkante gegen Kollision mit einem Objekt und umfasst eine Lichtgittereimichtung mit mindestens 2 Sendeelementen und mit mindestens 2 Empfangselementen zur Ausbildung von Lichtschrankenstrahlen in der Bewegungsebene zur Detektion eines Objekts in der Bewegungsebene und der Torkante und umfasst des Weiteren eine Auswerteeinrichtung, die dazu ausgebildet ist aufgrund der Detektion der Lichtgittereinrichtung zwischen Objekt oder Torkante zu unterscheiden und bei Detektion eines Objekts ein Sicherheitssignal zu erzeugen und umfasst des Weiteren eine Positionssensoreinrichtung die getrennt von der Lichtgittereinrichtung ausgebildet ist zur Detektion einer Position des Tors und zur Ausgabe eines Positionssignals das einem Positionsbereich der Torkante entspricht wobei die Auswerteeinrichtung weiterhin dazu ausgebildet ist, aufgrund der Unterbrechung eines bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahls der Lichtgittereinrichtung ein Überprüfungssignal zu erzeugen und wobei des Weiteren eine Kontrolleinrichtung vorhanden ist, die dazu ausgebildet ist, eine Plausibilitätsprüfung in Abhängigkeit von Positionssignal und Überprüfungssignal durchzuführen und in Abhängigkeit von der Plausibilitätsprüfung ein Sicherheitssignal zu erzeugen.The inventive gate securing system serves to protect a gate with a gate edge slidably leading in a plane of movement and in a movement direction against collision with an object and comprises a light grid direction with at least 2 transmitting elements and at least 2 Receiving elements for the formation of light barrier beams in the plane of motion for detecting an object in the plane of movement and the gate edge and further comprises an evaluation device which is adapted to distinguish due to the detection of the light grid device between the object or gate edge and to generate a security signal upon detection of an object and further comprises a position sensor device which is formed separately from the light grid device for detecting a position of the gate and for outputting a position signal which corresponds to a position range of the gate edge, wherein the evaluation device is further adapted to generate a check signal due to the interruption of a particular light barrier beam of the light grid device and wherein there is further provided a control device which is designed to carry out a plausibility check as a function of the position signal and the checking signal gnal and generate a safety signal depending on the plausibility check.

Das Torsicherungssystem kann den Vorteil haben, dass bei einer unkorrekten Unterscheidung der Auswerteeinrichtung, die einer Detektion der Lichtgittereinrichtung unkorrekter Weise die Torkante anstatt ein Objekt als Ursache zuordnet und daher unkorrekt kein Sicherheitssignal erzeugt, das Torsicherungssystem dennoch sicher reagiert, da nun anstatt der Auswerteeinrichtung die Kontrolleinrichtung das Sicherheitssignal erzeugen kann. Die Sicherheit des Torsicherheitssystems kann erhöht werden.The Torsicherungssystem can have the advantage that when an incorrect distinction of the evaluation that incorrectly assigns the gate edge instead of an object as a cause and therefore incorrectly generates no security signal in an incorrect detection of the light grid device, the Torsicherungssystem still responds safely because now instead of the evaluation, the control device can generate the safety signal. The safety of the door safety system can be increased.

Das Positionssignal kann vorzugsweise ein Wert aus einem Wertebereich sein. Das Überprüfungssignal kann vorzugsweise der Position eines Lichtgitterstahls zugeordnet sein. Die Auswerteeinrichtung kann vorzugsweise mehreren Lichtgitterstrahlen bei Unterbrechung jeweils ein zugeordnetes charakteristisches Überprüfungssignal erzeugen, das den jeweiligen Positionen der Lichtgitterstahlen zugeordnet istThe position signal may preferably be a value from a range of values. The check signal may preferably be associated with the position of a light grid steel. The evaluation device can preferably generate an associated characteristic checking signal, which is assigned to the respective positions of the light grating bars, in each case for a plurality of light grid beams when interrupted

Vorzugsweise ist die Auswerteeinrichtung dazu ausgebildet, aufgrund der Unterbrechung eines bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahls der Lichtgittereinrichtung ein Überprüfungssignal zu erzeugen das dem bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahl charakteristisch zugeordnet ist und einem Positionsbereich der Torkante an der Linie des bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahls oder zwischen dem bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahl und der geschlossen Stellung des Tors entspricht und/oder des Weiteren die Kontrolleinrichtung dazu ausgebildet, das Sicherheitssignal zu erzeugen wenn der dem Positionssignal entsprechende Positionsbereich ausserhalb des dem Überprüfungssignal entsprechenden Positionsbereich liegtPreferably, the evaluation device is adapted to generate due to the interruption of a particular light barrier beam of the light grid device, a verification signal which is associated with the particular Lichtschrankenstrahl characteristically and a position range of the gate edge on the line of the particular Lichtschrankenstrahls or between the particular Lichtschrankenstrahl and the closed position of the door corresponds and Furthermore, the control device is designed to transmit the safety signal generate when the position signal corresponding position range is outside the position corresponding to the check signal position range

Wenn das Überprüfungssignal erzeugt ist, sollte die bestimmte Lichtschranke von der Torkante oder, falls der Torkörper ebenfalls die Lichtschrankenstrahlen in der Bewegungsebene unterbrechen von den nachfolgenden Torblättem unterbrochen sein. Dann sollte das Positionssignal eine Position der Torkante an dem bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahl oder zwischen der bestimmten Lichtschranke und der geschlossen Stellung des Tors wiedergeben. Ist dem nicht so, so liegt ein unsicherer Zustand des Tors vor, sodass ein Sicherheitssignal erz eugt wird.When the verification signal is generated, the particular light barrier should be interrupted by the gate edge or, if the gate body also breaks the light barrier beams in the plane of movement, by the subsequent gate leaves. Then, the position signal should reflect a position of the gate edge at the particular light barrier beam or between the particular light barrier and the closed position of the door. If this is not the case, then there is an unsafe condition of the gate, so that a safety signal is ore eugt.

Bei Sektionaltoren weisen der Torkörper üblicherweise Sektionalabschnitte von gewisser Tiefe auf, die die Lichtschrankenstrahlen üblicherweise unterbrechen. Bei Folientoren weist der Torkörper üblicherweise eine dünne Folie auf, die die Lichtschrankenstrahlen üblicherweise nicht unterbrechen.In sectional doors, the door bodies usually have sectional sections of a certain depth, which usually interrupt the light barrier beams. In the case of film doors, the door body usually has a thin film which usually does not interrupt the light barrier beams.

Vorzugsweise umfasst die Positionssensoreinrichtung einen Drehgeber und/oder einen oder mehrere Endbereichsschalter.The position sensor device preferably comprises a rotary encoder and / or one or more end-zone switches.

Dies kann den Vorteil haben, dass die Positionssensoreinrichtung mehrfach Verwendung findet. Die Wirtschaftlichkeit des Torsicherungssystems kann erhöht werden.This can have the advantage that the position sensor device is used repeatedly. The efficiency of the Torsicherungssystems can be increased.

Drehgeber können an der Antriebswelle des Tors angebracht sein und über die Abrolldrehung des Tores die Position der Torkante bestimmen.Rotary encoders can be mounted on the drive shaft of the gate and determine the position of the gate edge by means of the unwinding rotation of the gate.

Endbereichsschalter können als Nocke oder Kurve auf der Torkante oder dem Torkörper an einen Schalter an der Torführung angreifen und so die Position oder einen Positionsbereich der Torkante bestimmen.End-of-range switches can act as a cam or curve on the gate edge or the gate body on a switch on the door guide and thus determine the position or a position range of the gate edge.

Vorzugsweise umfasst das Torsicherungssystem eine weitere Steuereinrichtung insbesondere zur positionsabhängigen Steuerung der Geschwindigkeit der Bewegung des Tors und/oder insbesondere zur positionsabhängigen Deaktivierung einer Schlauchkantensicherung an der Torkante. Vorzugsweise ist die Positionssensoreinrichtung dazu ausgebildet Signale an mindestens eine weitere Steuereinrichtung weiterzugeben insbesondere zur positionsabhängigen Steuerung der Geschwindigkeit der Bewegung des Tors und/oder insbesondere zur positionsabhängigen Deaktivierung einer Schlauchkantensicherung an der Torkante.Preferably, the Torsicherungssystem further comprises a control device in particular for position-dependent control of the speed of movement of the door and / or in particular for the position-dependent deactivation of a hose edge safety at the gate edge. Preferably, the position sensor device is designed to pass signals to at least one further control device, in particular for position-dependent control of the speed of movement of the door and / or in particular for the position-dependent deactivation of a hose edge safety device at the gate edge.

Die positionsabhängige Geschwindigkeitssteuerung kann etwa ein Abbremsen vor der Schliessposition ermöglichen. Das Torsicherungssystem kann den Vorteil haben, dass es den Komfort für den Nutzer erhöht.The position-dependent speed control may allow about a deceleration before the closing position. The Torsicherungssystem can have the advantage that it increases the comfort for the user.

Vorzugsweise ist die Auswerteeinrichtung mit der Lichtgittereinrichtung durch einem gemeinsamen Träger verbunden ist, insbesondere von einem gemeinsamen Gehäuse umfasst. Vorzugsweise ist die Kontrolleinrichtung mit der Antriebssteuerung des Tors oder ebenfalls mit der Lichtgittereinrichtung durch einem gemeinsamen Träger verbunden, insbesondere von einem gemeinsamen Gehäuse umfasst.Preferably, the evaluation device is connected to the light grid device by a common carrier, in particular by a common housing. Preferably, the control device is connected to the drive control of the door or also connected to the light grid device by a common carrier, in particular by a common housing.

Ein gemeinsamer Träger oder Gehäuse kann die Montage erleichtern und die Robustheit erhöhen. Das Torsicherungssystem kann die Montage erleichtern und/oder die Robustheit gegen Verschleiss erhöhen.A common carrier or housing can facilitate assembly and increase ruggedness. The Torsicherungssystem can facilitate the assembly and / or increase the robustness against wear.

Vorzugsweise die Lichtgitteranordnung so ausgebildet, dass der bestimmte Lichtschrankenstrahl in einer Höhe zwischen 2 cm und 30 cm, insbesondere zwischen 5 cm und 20 cm, insbesondere zwischen 10 cm und 15 cm über dem Boden angeordnet ist.Preferably, the light grid arrangement is formed so that the particular light barrier beam is disposed at a height between 2 cm and 30 cm, in particular between 5 cm and 20 cm, in particular between 10 cm and 15 cm above the ground.

Eine niedrige Anordnung des bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahls kann die Gefahr eines Einquetschens vermindern. Vorzugsweise wird nicht der unterste Lichtschrankenstrahl gewählt, damit ein Abbremsen des Tor noch sinnvoll möglich ist. Das Torsicherungssystem kann die Gefahr des Einquetschens verringern.A low location of the particular beam of light beam can reduce the risk of crushing. Preferably, the lowest light beam beam is not selected so that a slowing down of the gate is still possible. The Torsicherungssystem can reduce the risk of crushing.

Vorzugsweise ist die Positionssensoreinrichtung so ausgebildet, dass die Ausgabe des Positionssignals erfolgt bei der Detektion des Tores etwa +/-20 cm, insbesondere etwa +/-10 cm, insbesondere etwa +/-5 cm, insbesondere etwa +/-1 cm, insbesondere genau um die Position des Tores bei Eintritt der Torkante in die bestimmte Lichtschranke. Vorzugsweise ist die Positionssensoreinrichtung so ausgebildet, dass die Ausgabe des Positionssignals während einer bestimmten Zeitdauer erfolgt nach der das Tor eine bestimmte Position erreicht hat.Preferably, the position sensor device is designed such that the output of the position signal takes place when detecting the gate about +/- 20 cm, in particular about +/- 10 cm, in particular about +/- 5 cm, in particular about +/- 1 cm, in particular exactly at the position of the gate when the gate edge enters the specific light barrier. The position sensor device is preferably designed so that the output of the position signal takes place during a certain period of time after which the door has reached a specific position.

Die Bereichstolerante Ausgabe des Positionssignals kann die Stabilität der Plausibilitätsprüfung erhöhen. Das Torsicherungssystem kann die Systemstabilität erhöhen.The range tolerant output of the position signal may increase the stability of the plausibility check. The Torsicherungssystem can increase the system stability.

Vorzugsweise ist die Positionssensoreinrichtung dazu ausgebildet, die einem Positionssignal zugeordnete Position des Tor durch eine Lernfahrt des Tores aufzunehmen, wobei insbesondere das oder die Überprüfungssignale zur Erkennung und/oder Speicherung der Position des Tors herangezogen werden,Preferably, the position sensor device is configured to record the position of the gate associated with a position signal by a learning run of the gate, wherein in particular the one or more check signals are used to detect and / or store the position of the gate,

Dabei kann das Tor sich etwa von oben nach unten schliessen wobei beim Überfahren und Unterbrechen des oder der bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahlen, das oder die entsprechenden Überprüfungssignale an die Kontrolleinrichtung weitergegeben werden, die diese in ihrem Speicher mit dem oder den zeitgleich eingehenden Positionssignalen verbindet. Die Positionssignale können Werte aus einem Wertebereich darstellen, der dem Fahrweg des Tors entspricht.In this case, the gate can close approximately from top to bottom and when passing and interrupting the or the particular light beam beams, the or the corresponding verification signals are passed to the control device that connects them in their memory with the or simultaneously incoming position signals. The position signals can represent values from a value range that corresponds to the travel path of the gate.

Dies kann den Aufwand bei der Inbetriebnahme verringern.This can reduce the effort during commissioning.

Vorzugsweise ist das Torsicherungssystem und/oder die Auswerteeinrichtung und/oder die Kontrolleinrichtung dazu ausgebildet, das Tor bei erzeugtem Sicherheitssignal zu stoppen und/oder zu reversieren.Preferably, the Torsicherungssystem and / or the evaluation device and / or the control device is adapted to stop the gate when the safety signal generated and / or reverse.

Das erfindungsgemässe Tor umfasst ein erfindungsgemässes Torsicherungssystem der vorgenannten Art.The inventive gate comprises a Torsicherungssystem invention of the aforementioned type.

Das erfindungsgemässe Tor kann die Vorteile des Torsicherungssystems aufweisen.The inventive gate can have the advantages of Torsicherungssystems.

Weitere Merkmale der Erfindung sind in den Zeichnungen angegeben.Further features of the invention are indicated in the drawings.

Die jeweils genannten Vorteile können sich auch für Merkmalskombinationen realisieren in deren Zusammenhang sie nicht genannt sind.The advantages mentioned in each case can also be realized for combinations of features in the context of which they are not mentioned.

Überblick über die Zeichnungen:Overview of the drawings:

Ausführungsbeispiele der Erfindung sind in den Zeichnungen dargestellt und werden im Folgenden näher erläutert. Gleiche Bezugszeichen in den einzelnen Figuren bezeichnen dabei einander entsprechende Elemente. Es zeigen

Fig. 1
ein Tor mit Torsicherungssystem und Endbereichsschalter und
Fig. 2
ein Tor mit Torsicherungssystem und Drehgeber.
Embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the drawings and are explained in more detail below. The same reference numerals in the individual figures designate corresponding elements. Show it
Fig. 1
a gate with Torsicherungssystem and Endbereichsschalter and
Fig. 2
a gate with Torsicherungssystem and rotary encoder.

Detaillierte Beschreibung der Zeichnungen:Detailed description of the drawings:

Fig. 1 zeigt ein Tor 1 mit einem Torsicherungssystem 2 mit einem Endbereichsschalter 3 auf den eine Nockenkurve 4 wirkt. Der Nocken betätigt den Endbereichsschalter wenn die Torkante 5 in einem Bereich zwischen dem bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahl 6 und dem Boden ist. Eine Lichtgittervorrichtung 7 besteht aus einer Senderleiste 8 mit Sendern 9 und mit einer Empfängerleiste 10 mit parallel zugeordneten Empfängern 11. Die Lichtschrankenstrahlen 12 sind durch das Tor unterbrochen, der bestimmte Lichtschrankenstrahl 6 ist durch ein Objekt unterbrochen und der Lichtschrankenstrahl 13 ist nicht unterbrochen. Die Empfänger sind mit einer Verbindung 14 mit der Auswerteeinrichtung 15 verbunden die sich im Gehäuse 16 der Lichtgittereinrichtung 7 befindet. Die Auswerteeinrichtung ist mit der Motorsteuerung 17 über eine Verbindung 18 verbunden über welche ein Sicherheitssignal gesendet werden kann. Der Empfänger 19 des bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahls 6 ist über eine Verbindung 20 mit der Kontrolleinrichtung 21 verbunden. Der Endbereichsschalter 3 ist über eine Verbindung 22 mit der Kontrolleinrichtung 21 verbunden. Die Kontrolleinrichtung 21 ist mit der Motorsteuerung 17 verbunden und kann dieser ebenfalls ein Sicherheitssignal übermitteln. Die Motorsteuerung 17 ist mit dem Motor 23 verbunden welcher das Tor 1 durch Aufrollen oder Abrollen über die Welle 24 antreibt. Die Motorsteuerung stoppt und reversiert den abrollenden Motor im Falle eines Sicherheitssignals. Fig. 1 shows a gate 1 with a Torsicherungssystem 2 with a Endbereichsschalter 3 on which a cam curve 4 acts. The cam operates the end range switch when the gate edge 5 is in an area between the particular light barrier beam 6 and the ground. A light grid device 7 consists of a transmitter strip 8 with transmitters 9 and a receiver strip 10 with receivers 11 assigned in parallel. The light barrier beams 12 are interrupted by the gate, the specific light barrier beam 6 is interrupted by an object and the light barrier beam 13 is not interrupted. The receivers are connected by a connection 14 to the evaluation device 15, which is located in the housing 16 of the light grid device 7. The evaluation device is connected to the motor controller 17 via a connection 18 via which a security signal can be sent. The receiver 19 of the specific light barrier beam 6 is connected to the control device 21 via a connection 20. The end range switch 3 is connected to the control device 21 via a connection 22. The control device 21 is connected to the motor controller 17 and can also transmit this to a safety signal. The motor controller 17 is connected to the motor 23 which drives the door 1 by rolling or rolling over the shaft 24. The motor control stops and reverses the rolling motor in case of a safety signal.

Das Objekt 25 unterbricht den bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahl 6. Dies führt zur Detektion durch den zugeordneten Empfänger 19 und zur Erzeugung eines dem bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahl zugeordneten Überprüfungssignals das über die Verbindung 20 an die Kontrolleinrichtung übermittelt wird. Der Endbereichsschalter 3 ist noch nicht durch die Nockenkurve 4 des Tors geschalten. Dieser Schaltungszustand einer Position der Torkante 5 noch vor dem bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahl 6 und wird als Positionssignal an die Kontrolleinrichtung 21 übermittelt. Der Kontrolleinrichtung ist die dem Überprüfungssignal entsprechende Position sowie der dem Positionssignal entsprechende Positionsbereich im Speicher hinterlegt. Die Kontrolleinrichtung vergleicht nun das Überprüfungssignal mit dem Positionssignal auf Plausibilität ob der dem Überprüfungssignal entsprechende Positionsbereich innerhalb des Positionsbereichs des Positionssignals liegt. Im vorliegenden Fall ist dies nicht der Fall, da das Objekt 25 und nicht die Torkante den bestimmten Lichtschrankenstrahl 6 unterbricht. Weil der dem Positionssignal entsprechende Positionsbereich ausserhalb des dem Überprüfungssignal entsprechenden Positionsbereich liegt erzeugt die Kontrolleinrichtung 21 ein Sicherheitssignal das der Motorsteuerung 17 übermittelt wird, welche den Motor 23 und das Tor 1 stoppt und reversiertThe object 25 interrupts the determined light beam beam 6. This leads to the detection by the associated receiver 19 and to the generation of a specific light beam beam associated with the verification signal which is transmitted via the connection 20 to the control device. The Endbereichsschalter 3 is not yet switched by the cam curve 4 of the gate. This circuit state of a position of the gate edge 5 even before the specific light barrier beam 6 and is transmitted as a position signal to the control device 21. The control device has the position corresponding to the check signal and the position range corresponding to the position signal stored in the memory. The control device now compares the check signal with the position signal for plausibility as to whether the position range corresponding to the check signal lies within the position range of the position signal. In the present case, this is not the case, since the object 25 and not the gate edge interrupts the particular light barrier beam 6. Because the position range corresponding to the position signal is outside the position corresponding to the check signal position range the control device 21 generates a safety signal which is transmitted to the motor control 17, which stops and reverses the motor 23 and the gate 1

Fig. 2 zeigt das Tor 1 mit einem Torsicherungssystem 2 mit einem Drehgeber 26 der mit der der Kontrolleinrichtung 21 verbunden ist. Der Drehgeber detektiert die Drehung der Welle 24 und übermittelt die Drehung an die Kontrolleinrichtung. Die Kontrolleinrichtung errechnet aus den Drehwerten die Position des Tors und der Torkante. Die Position die der Torkante am bestimmten Lichtstrahlenstahl 6 entspricht wird der Kontrolleinrichtung eingegeben oder eingelernt. Der sonstige Aufbau und Wirkungsweise entsprechen Figur 1. Fig. 2 shows the gate 1 with a Torsicherungssystem 2 with a rotary encoder 26 which is connected to the control device 21. The rotary encoder detects the rotation of the shaft 24 and transmits the rotation to the control device. The control unit calculates the position of the gate and the gate edge from the rotational values. The position corresponding to the gate edge on the particular beam steel 6 is entered or taught the control device. The other structure and mode of action correspond FIG. 1 ,

Claims (10)

  1. Gate safety system
    - for securing a gate with a gate edge, displaceably leading along a movement level and in a movement direction, against collision with an object, comprising
    - a light grid means
    - with at least 2 transmission elements and with at least 2 receiver elements
    - for forming light barrier beams along the movement level
    - for detecting an object at movement level and the gate edge;
    - an evaluation means, designed for
    - based on the detection of the light grid means
    - differentiating between object or gate edge
    - and for generating a safety signal when an object is detected;
    - a position sensor means
    - designed separately from the light grid means
    - for detecting a position of the gate, and
    - for issuing a position signal
    - that equals a position area of the gate edge,
    characterised in that
    - the evaluation means is further designed for
    - generating a verification signal based on the interruption of a specific light barrier beam of the light grid means, and
    - in that a control means is provided and designed for
    - carrying out a plausibility test depending on the position signal and verification signal
    - and for generating a safety signal depending on the plausibility test.
  2. Gate safety system according to claim 1, characterised in that
    - the evaluation means is designed for
    - generating a monitoring signal based on the interruption of a specific light barrier beam of the light grid means, the same characteristically allocated to the specific light barrier beam and equalling a position area of the gate edge on the line of the specific light barrier beam, or between the specific light barrier beam and the closed position of the gate
    and/or in that
    - the control means is designed for
    - generating the safety signal
    - when the position area equalling the position signal lies outside of the position area equalling the monitoring signal.
  3. Gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims, characterised in that
    - the position sensor means
    - comprises a rotary encoder and/or
    - one or more end area switches.
  4. Gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims, characterised in that
    - the gate safety system comprises a further controller,
    - in particular for the position dependent control of the speed of the movement of the gate and/or
    - in particular for the position dependent deactivation of a hose edge protector at the gate edge and/or
    - in that the position sensor means is designed for
    - transmitting signals to at least one further controller,
    - in particular for the position dependent control of the speed of the movement of the gate and/or
    - in particular for the position dependent deactivation of a hose edge protector at the gate edge.
  5. Gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims,
    characterised in that
    - the evaluation means
    - is connected with the light grid means by a common support, in particular enclosed by a common housing and/or
    - in that the controller
    - is connected with the drive controller of the gate by a common support, in particular enclosed by a common housing, or
    - is also connected with the light grid means by a common support, in particular enclosed by a common housing.
  6. Gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims,
    characterised in that
    - the light grid arrangement is designed in such a way that
    - the specific light barrier beam is located at a height of between 2 cm and 30 cm, in particular between 5 cm and 20 cm, in particular between 10 cm and 15 cm above the ground.
  7. Gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims,
    characterised in that
    - the position sensor means is designed in such a way that
    - the issue of the position signal occurs upon detection of the gate at approximately +/-20 cm, in particular approximately +/- 10 cm, in particular approximately +/- 5 cm, in particular approximately +/- 1 cm, in particular exactly at the position of the gate when the gate edge enters the specific light barrier and/or in that
    - the issue of the position signal occurs during a specific time period, after which the gate has reached a specific position.
  8. Gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims,
    characterised in that
    - the position sensor means is designed in such a way that
    - the position of the gate allocated to a position signal is recorded by a learning movement of the gate,
    - whereby the monitoring signal(s) in particular is/are used for detecting and/or storing the position of the gate.
  9. Gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims,
    characterised in that
    - the gate safety system, and/or the evaluation means and/or the controller are designed for
    - stopping and/or reversing the gate when the safety signal is generated.
  10. Gate with a gate safety system according to one of the above mentioned claims.
EP13003615.5A 2013-07-18 2013-07-18 Gate securing system Active EP2845985B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DK13003615.5T DK2845985T3 (en) 2013-07-18 2013-07-18 Port Security System
EP13003615.5A EP2845985B1 (en) 2013-07-18 2013-07-18 Gate securing system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP13003615.5A EP2845985B1 (en) 2013-07-18 2013-07-18 Gate securing system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2845985A1 EP2845985A1 (en) 2015-03-11
EP2845985B1 true EP2845985B1 (en) 2015-11-18

Family

ID=48875463

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13003615.5A Active EP2845985B1 (en) 2013-07-18 2013-07-18 Gate securing system

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2845985B1 (en)
DK (1) DK2845985T3 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3530869B1 (en) 2018-02-27 2020-04-15 Cedes AG Light grid with distance information and use thereof
FR3101911B1 (en) * 2019-10-09 2021-10-01 Sofineco Soc Pour Letude Et Le Financement Dentreprises Industrielles Et Commerciales Virtual safety edge for handling door

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19739543A1 (en) 1997-09-09 1999-03-11 Efaflex Inzeniring D O O Ljubl Safety device for motorized gates
DE102005003794A1 (en) 2005-01-26 2006-08-03 Cedes Ag Gate, e.g. rolling gate, protecting device, has light barriers between which distance transfers another light barrier in measuring state if gate is in path between another two of barriers and before gate reaches former barrier
DE102008023294B4 (en) 2008-01-16 2010-02-04 Cedes Ag Securing system for securing a moving, guided movement element against unwanted collisions
DE102010017398B3 (en) * 2010-06-16 2011-12-01 Feig Electronic Gmbh Method for operating gate i.e. rolling gate in building, involves releasing signals during interruption of light lines of danger area and protection area, respectively, and releasing different action by gate controller based on signals
DK2506034T3 (en) 2011-04-01 2013-09-02 Cedes Ag Sensor device, safety device, door and movement control method
EP2586959B2 (en) 2011-10-28 2016-09-14 Cedes AG Safety device, closing device and evaluation unit

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2845985A1 (en) 2015-03-11
DK2845985T3 (en) 2016-02-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2586959B2 (en) Safety device, closing device and evaluation unit
EP2506034B1 (en) Sensor device, safety device, door and method for controlling its movement
DE3618692C2 (en)
EP1089030B1 (en) Device and method for monitoring a protection zone
EP2574718B1 (en) Safety system for safeguarding a moving, guided motion element against unwanted collisions
EP1841942B1 (en) Device for protecting a driven moving element
EP2404859B1 (en) Monitoring device for securing a driven element
DE4201971A1 (en) DARKENING DEVICE
DE19739544A1 (en) Safety device for motor-driven systems
EP1972751A2 (en) Monitoring system for a motorised door
WO2016116178A1 (en) Method for controlling a gate assembly, such a gate assembly, and safety device therefor
DE102008044990A1 (en) Method for controlling or monitoring drivable wing, particularly in form of rotating wing, sliding door wing, wing of folding door and window, involves projecting predetermined space element or opening wing in monitoring and releasing area
EP3584400A1 (en) Safety door and method for operating a safety door
DE102006008513A1 (en) Sensor-monitoring device for motor driven wing of automatic door, has evaluation circuit provided for control and/or evaluation of detection signal, and sensors with overlapping area with reference to monitoring area
EP2306063B1 (en) Security sensor
DE102007033766A1 (en) light Curtain
DE10228930B4 (en) Sensor device for an automatic revolving door system
DE102014111694A1 (en) Apparatus for monitoring machine motion and method for monitoring machine motion
EP2845985B1 (en) Gate securing system
EP2799384A1 (en) Motor-driven door with a safety device
EP3660251A1 (en) Protective device, especially industrial gate
DE102013212518A1 (en) Automatic window or door system
EP3074583B1 (en) Method for operating an industrial door with a force detection device
DE60201287T2 (en) Motorized roller shutter with device for switching off a motor drive when an obstacle is detected
EP2634358B1 (en) Intelligent obstacle detection

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130808

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: E06B 9/88 20060101ALI20150608BHEP

Ipc: E06B 9/68 20060101AFI20150608BHEP

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: CEDES AG

Owner name: FRABA AG

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150715

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 761680

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20151215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502013001467

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

Effective date: 20160222

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20160218

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160318

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160218

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160318

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160219

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: KELLER AND PARTNER PATENTANWAELTE AG, CH

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502013001467

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160819

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160801

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20170331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160718

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20170718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20130718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151118

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 761680

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180718

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PFA

Owner name: CEDES AG, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: CEDES AG, DE

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230519

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20230801

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240719

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20240722

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20240801

Year of fee payment: 12