Covey et al., 1989 - Google Patents
Marginal ridge strength of restored teeth with modified Class II cavity preparations.Covey et al., 1989
- Document ID
- 16328352716943800525
- Author
- Covey D
- Schulein T
- Kohout F
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)
External Links
Snippet
This study compared marginal ridge fracture resistance in two groups of teeth restored with modified Class II cavity preparations, with control groups. The results indicated that the composite resin and dental amalgam restored teeth fractured at compressive loads that …
- 238000002360 preparation method 0 title abstract description 5
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Van Dijken | All-ceramic restorations: classification and clinical evaluations. | |
| Ostlund et al. | Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation. | |
| McLAREN | Luminescent veneers. | |
| Roeters et al. | Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results. | |
| Lutz et al. | Resin composites in the post-amalgam age. | |
| Wendt Jr | Microleakage and cusp fracture resistance of heat-treated composite resin inlays. | |
| Lüscher et al. | Microleakage and marginal adaptation of composite resin restorations. | |
| Covey et al. | Marginal ridge strength of restored teeth with modified Class II cavity preparations. | |
| Paul et al. | Post and core reconstruction for fixed prosthodontic restoration. | |
| Reinhardt et al. | Effect of Gluma desensitization on dentin bond strength. | |
| Spasser | Repair and restoration of a fractured, pulpally involved anterior tooth: report of case. | |
| Wilkie et al. | Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years. | |
| Gibson et al. | A clinical evaluation of occlusal composite and amalgam restorations: one-and two-year results. | |
| Widström et al. | Selection of restorative materials in dental treatment of children and adults in public and private dental care in Finland. | |
| Matis et al. | How finishing affects glass ionomers. Results of a five-year evaluation. | |
| Larson | Techniques for achieving realistic color distribution in large composite resin restorations. | |
| Noack et al. | Tooth-colored inlays. | |
| Kreulen et al. | Two-year results with box-only resin composite restorations. | |
| Liebenberg | SONICSYS approx: an innovative addition to the restorative continuum. | |
| Leinfelder et al. | Occlusion and restorative materials. | |
| Pashley | Dentin bonding agents. | |
| Summitt et al. | Effect of grooves on resistance/retention form of Class 2 approximal slot amalgam restorations. | |
| Van Dijken | A six year follow-up of three dental alloy restorations with different copper contents. | |
| Donly et al. | Glass inserts. A new dimension in restorative dentistry. | |
| Brackett | The etiology and treatment of cervical erosion. |