Leinfelder et al., 1995 - Google Patents
Occlusion and restorative materials.Leinfelder et al., 1995
- Document ID
- 11048445760780863055
- Author
- Leinfelder K
- Yarnell G
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Dental Clinics of North America
External Links
Snippet
Undoubtedly, the materials used in conjunction with restorative dentistry have been changing over the years. Although restorative systems before the early 1960s have changed only moderately, the last two to three decades have witnessed some fairly dramatic …
- 239000000463 material 0 title abstract description 8
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Attin et al. | Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. | |
| Ostlund et al. | Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation. | |
| Roeters et al. | Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results. | |
| Hickel et al. | A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars. | |
| Patel et al. | Fractures of posterior teeth: a review and analysis of associated factors. | |
| Coca et al. | Long-term experience with telescopically retained overdentures (double crown technique). | |
| Sangwan et al. | An in vitro Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of endodontically treated Teeth with Different Restorative Materials. | |
| Akkayan et al. | Resistance to fracture of crowned teeth restored with different post systems. | |
| Soares et al. | Marginal adaptation of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems. | |
| Suzuki et al. | Wear resistance of resin cements. | |
| Leinfelder et al. | Occlusion and restorative materials. | |
| McLaren et al. | Considerations in the use of polymer and fiber-based indirect restorative materials. | |
| Koczarski | Utilization of ceromer inlays/onlays for replacement of amalgam restorations. | |
| Bassiouny et al. | Permanent incisors traumatized through predecessors: sequelae and possible management. | |
| Folkesson et al. | Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars. | |
| Erverdi et al. | Cephalometric evaluation of Haas and hyrax rapid maxillary appliances in the treatment of the skeletal maxillary transverse deficiency. | |
| Lundin et al. | Class II composite resin restorations: a three-year clinical study of six different posterior composites. | |
| Roulet et al. | Criteria for substituting amalgam with composite resins. | |
| Prestipino et al. | Clinical and laboratory considerations in the use of a new all-ceramic restorative system. | |
| Estafan et al. | A new approach to restorative dentistry: fabricating ceramic restorations using CEREC CAD/CAM. | |
| Donly et al. | Glass inserts. A new dimension in restorative dentistry. | |
| Tuncelli et al. | Comparison of load transfer by angulated, standard and inclined implant abutments. | |
| Van Dijken | A six year follow-up of three dental alloy restorations with different copper contents. | |
| Kordass et al. | Occlusion of artificial teeth in partial dentures in the" chewing center"--first exploratory population-based evaluations. | |
| Sepet et al. | Artificially formed caries-like lesions around Class II glass ionomer restorations in primary molars. |