Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Gökçen-Rohlig et al., 2014 - Google Patents

Comparative evaluation of the effects of implant position, impression material, and tray type on implant impression accuracy

Gökçen-Rohlig et al., 2014

View PDF
Document ID
7193742983634258428
Author
Gökçen-Rohlig B
Öngül D
Sancakli E
Sermet B
Publication year
Publication venue
Implant dentistry

External Links

Snippet

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of implant position, impression, and tray material on the accuracy of implant impressions of edentulous arches with multiple implants. Materials and Methods: Four experimental groups were produced; medium-viscosity polyvinyl siloxane …
Continue reading at www.researchgate.net (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0004—Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C19/05—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for determining occlusion
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
    • A61C9/004—Means or methods for taking digitized impressions
    • A61C9/0046—Data acquisition means or methods
    • A61C9/0053—Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
    • A61K6/00—Preparations for dentistry
    • A61K6/10—Compositions for taking dental impressions
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C1/00—Dental machines for boring or cutting; General features of dental machines or apparatus, e.g. hand-piece design
    • A61C1/08—Machine parts specially adapted for dentistry
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C8/00—Means to be fixed to the jaw-bone for consolidating natural teeth or for fixing dental prostheses thereon; Dental implants; Implanting tools
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C5/00—Filling or capping teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Alikhasi et al. Digital implant impression technique accuracy: a systematic review
Vandeweghe et al. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study
Martínez-Rus et al. Accuracy of definitive casts using 4 implant-level impression techniques in a scenario of multi-implant system with different implant angulations and subgingival alignment levels
Gökçen-Rohlig et al. Comparative evaluation of the effects of implant position, impression material, and tray type on implant impression accuracy
Solaberrieta et al. Intraoral digital impressions for virtual occlusal records: section quantity and dimensions
Papaspyridakos et al. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes
Wismeijer et al. Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants
Vojdani et al. Accuracy of different impression materials in parallel and nonparallel implants
Moreno et al. A clinical protocol for intraoral digital impression of screw-retained CAD/CAM framework on multiple implants based on wavefront sampling technology
Geraets et al. Annual bone loss and success rates of dental implants based on radiographic measurements
Iwaki et al. Dimensional accuracy of optical bite registration in single and multiple unit restorations
Rajan et al. Evaluation of marginal fit and internal adaptation of zirconia copings fabricated by two CAD-CAM systems: An: in vitro: study
Paek et al. Comparative analysis of screw loosening with prefabricated abutments and customized CAD/CAM abutments
Pera et al. Analysis of different impression techniques and materials on multiple implants through 3-dimensional laser scanner
Roig et al. In vitro comparison of the accuracy of four intraoral scanners and three conventional impression methods for two neighboring implants
Shankar et al. Accuracy of implant impressions using various impression techniques and impression materials
Molinero-Mourelle et al. Photogrammetric and intraoral digital impression technique for the rehabilitation of multiple unfavorably positioned dental implants: a clinical report
Arora et al. Evaluation of the effect of implant angulations and impression techniques on implant cast accuracy–An in vitro study
Cheng et al. Accuracy of edentulous full‐arch implant impression: an in vitro comparison between conventional impression, intraoral scan with and without splinting, and photogrammetry
Patil et al. A radiographic measurement technique for crest bone changes related to dental implants
Ferreira et al. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions
Moris et al. Influence of Manufacturing Methods of Implant‐Supported Crowns on External and Internal Marginal Fit: A Micro‐CT Analysis
Farronato et al. Verification of the reliability of the three-dimensional virtual presurgical orthodontic diagnostic protocol
Calesini et al. Effect of 2 impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of working implant prosthesis models: An in vitro study
Tafti et al. Comparison of the accuracy of open-tray and snap-on impression techniques of implants with different angulations