Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Pera et al., 2016 - Google Patents

Analysis of different impression techniques and materials on multiple implants through 3-dimensional laser scanner

Pera et al., 2016

Document ID
5976319722059023510
Author
Pera F
Pesce P
Bevilacqua M
Setti P
Menini M
Publication year
Publication venue
Implant dentistry

External Links

Snippet

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 7 different implant impression techniques for full-arch prostheses. Materials and Methods: A master cast simulating an edentulous arch with 4 implants was used. Seven impression techniques were …
Continue reading at journals.lww.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0004—Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
    • A61C9/004—Means or methods for taking digitized impressions
    • A61C9/0046—Data acquisition means or methods
    • A61C9/0053—Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C8/00—Means to be fixed to the jaw-bone for consolidating natural teeth or for fixing dental prostheses thereon; Dental implants; Implanting tools
    • A61C8/0048—Connecting the upper structure to the implant, e.g. bridging bars
    • A61C8/005—Connecting devices for joining an upper structure with an implant member, e.g. spacers
    • A61C8/0069—Connecting devices for joining an upper structure with an implant member, e.g. spacers tapered or conical connection
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C8/00—Means to be fixed to the jaw-bone for consolidating natural teeth or for fixing dental prostheses thereon; Dental implants; Implanting tools
    • A61C8/0087—Means for sterile storage or manipulation of dental implants
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C8/00—Means to be fixed to the jaw-bone for consolidating natural teeth or for fixing dental prostheses thereon; Dental implants; Implanting tools
    • A61C8/0001—Impression means for implants, e.g. impression coping
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C8/00—Means to be fixed to the jaw-bone for consolidating natural teeth or for fixing dental prostheses thereon; Dental implants; Implanting tools
    • A61C2008/0084—Provisional implants or abutments
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
    • A61K6/00—Preparations for dentistry
    • A61K6/10—Compositions for taking dental impressions
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00—Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/185—Acids; Anhydrides, halides or salts thereof, e.g. sulfur acids, imidic, hydrazonic, hydroximic acids
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C5/00—Filling or capping teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C7/00—Orthodontics, i.e. obtaining or maintaining the desired position of teeth, e.g. by straightening, evening, regulating, separating, or by correcting malocclusions
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C1/00—Dental machines for boring or cutting; General features of dental machines or apparatus, e.g. hand-piece design
    • A61C1/08—Machine parts specially adapted for dentistry
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/14—Applications or adaptations for dentistry

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Pera et al. Analysis of different impression techniques and materials on multiple implants through 3-dimensional laser scanner
Menini et al. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure
Vojdani et al. Accuracy of different impression materials in parallel and nonparallel implants
Martínez-Rus et al. Accuracy of definitive casts using 4 implant-level impression techniques in a scenario of multi-implant system with different implant angulations and subgingival alignment levels
Öngül et al. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants
Vandeweghe et al. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study
Sahin et al. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status
Wismeijer et al. Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants
Kurtulmus-Yilmaz et al. Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants
Stimmelmayr et al. Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw
Gherlone et al. Digital impressions for fabrication of definitive “all-on-four” restorations
Moreno et al. A clinical protocol for intraoral digital impression of screw-retained CAD/CAM framework on multiple implants based on wavefront sampling technology
Ebadian et al. Effect of different impression materials and techniques on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts
Al Amri et al. Crestal bone loss around adjacent dental implants restored with splinted and nonsplinted fixed restorations: a systematic literature review
Machado et al. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants
Roig et al. In vitro comparison of the accuracy of four intraoral scanners and three conventional impression methods for two neighboring implants
Assunção et al. Prosthetic transfer impression accuracy evaluation for osseointegrated implants
Alikhasi et al. The effect of implant angulation on the transfer accuracy of external‐connection implants
Ehsani et al. Comparative evaluation of impression accuracy of tilted and straight implants in All-on-Four technique
Pujari et al. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study
Stimmelmayr et al. Implant impression techniques for the edentulous jaw: a summary of three studies
Haghi et al. Effect of technique and impression material on the vertical misfit of a screw-retained, three-unit implant bridge: An: in vitro: study
Gökçen-Rohlig et al. Comparative evaluation of the effects of implant position, impression material, and tray type on implant impression accuracy
Farronato et al. Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation
Arora et al. Evaluation of the effect of implant angulations and impression techniques on implant cast accuracy–An in vitro study