| Because the original was successful, so they tried to milk the title. |
glasssmoon said: They're literal sequels (and a prequel), not spinoffs. No. Sequels to WHAT? They're anything but that. |
| Everything old and good must be ruined. |
| i doubt it but i really miss the og characters 😞 the sequels/spinoffs just don't hit the same without them |
Reply to glasssmoon
cloud3299 said:
No. Sequels to WHAT?
They're anything but that.
glasssmoon said:
They're literal sequels (and a prequel), not spinoffs.
They're literal sequels (and a prequel), not spinoffs.
No. Sequels to WHAT?
They're anything but that.
Go on with the delusional copium, but they are indeed sequels lmfao.
| @glasssmoon Depressional more than delusional, Progressive was an hot garbage of a joke. Anyway, there aren't sequels indeed for how bad are written. |
I mean sure, but they're sequels (and prequel) only based on technicalities with certain characters. You say this as if they aren't essentially seperate works and can't be very easily viewed as such (besides Alternative and Shoegaze). And I'm not even in the camp of "sequels bad grr." |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Furi Kuri Episode 6 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )babykeiji - Mar 7, 2008 |
296 |
by detarameMAL
»»
Feb 28, 8:49 AM |
|
Poll: » Furi Kuri Episode 5 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )aero - Sep 22, 2008 |
123 |
by detarameMAL
»»
Feb 26, 4:50 AM |
|
Poll: » Furi Kuri Episode 4 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )aero - Sep 22, 2008 |
134 |
by detarameMAL
»»
Feb 25, 4:54 AM |
|
Poll: » Furi Kuri Episode 3 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )aero - Sep 21, 2008 |
141 |
by detarameMAL
»»
Feb 24, 2:24 AM |
|
Poll: » Furi Kuri Episode 2 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )Piroko - Apr 28, 2008 |
158 |
by detarameMAL
»»
Feb 23, 8:59 AM |