Notice. Imprimer la notice. Advancing phenomenology: essays in honor of lester embree (contributi... more Notice. Imprimer la notice. Advancing phenomenology: essays in honor of lester embree (contributions to pheno menology, Vol. 62). Auteur : NENON T. Prix indicatif 166,16 Ajouter au panier le livre de NENON T. Date de parution : 07-2010 Langue : ANGLAIS 390p. ...
This list introduces the leading researchers and scholars in North America who became widely reco... more This list introduces the leading researchers and scholars in North America who became widely recognized for significant contributions to Edmund Husserl scholarship in the 20th century. As a historical list, it also does not include several outstanding younger scholars who have emerged in the twenty-first century.
This chapter introduces the history of the CARP, the “Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenolo... more This chapter introduces the history of the CARP, the “Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology”.
Introduction.- INITIAL AND CONTINUED RECEPTION.- 1. Jose Ortega y Gasset and Human Rights, J.M. D... more Introduction.- INITIAL AND CONTINUED RECEPTION.- 1. Jose Ortega y Gasset and Human Rights, J.M. Diaz Alvarez.- Reading and Rereading Ideen in Japan, T. Tani.- Edith Stein and Autism, K.M. Haney.- Ludwig Ferdinand Clauss and Racialization, R. Bernasconi.- The Ideen and Neo-Kantianism, A. Staiti.- The Distinctive Structure of the Emotions, A.J. Steinbock.- From Natural Attitude to Life-World, D. Moran.- Husserl on the Human Sciences in Ideen II, T.M. Seebohm.- AFTER WORLD WAR I.- The Spanish Speaking World and Jose Vasconcelos, A. Zirion.- The Ideen and Italy, R.Sacconghi.- Martin Heidegger and the Grounding of Action, T.J. Nenon.- Aron Gurwitsch and the Transcendence of the Physical, W. McKenna.- Ludwig Landgrebe and Marginal Consciousness, D. Marcelle.- Dorion Cairns, Empirical Types, and Field of Consciousness, L. Embree.- Ideen I and Eugen Fink, R. Bruzina.- Emmanuel Levinas and a Soliloquy of Light and Reason, N. de Warren.- Jan Patocka and Built Space, J. Dodd.- The Ideen in the Portuguese Speaking World, P.M.S. Alves.- Alfred Schutz and the Problem of Empathy, M. Barber.- Jean-Paul Sartre and Phenomenological Ontology, M. C. Eshleman.- Simone de Beauvoir and Life, U. Bjork.- Merleau-Ponty and Lifeworldly Naturalism, T. Toadvine.- AFTER WORLD WAR II.- Paul Ricoeur and the Praxis of Phenomenology, N. Depraz.- Post-War German Reception of Ideen I and Reflection, S. Geniusas.- Ideen I Confronting its Critics, R.R.P. Lerner.- Jacques Derrida and the Future, V.W. Cisney.- Gilles Deleuze, and Hearing-Oneself-Speak, L. Lawlor.- Thoughts on the Translation of Husserl's Ideen, Erstes Buch, F. Kersten.- Notes on Contributors.
A proper comprehension of the notion of “foundation” is crucial, among other things, for an under... more A proper comprehension of the notion of “foundation” is crucial, among other things, for an understanding of Husserl’s theory of intersubjectivity, his analyses of the relationship between body and mind, his determination of the relationship between nature and our everyday surroundings (Umwelt), and his theory of meaning and language. For example, with regard to Husserl’s treatment of intersubjectivity, commentators and critics have observed that Husserl’s theory is decisively shaped by the thesis that our experience of “others” as subjects is founded upon our experience of them as physical objects, i.e., by his attempt to anchor intersubjective experience in sense experience; or alternatively, with regard to his theories of mind and language, how his theory is based upon a positing of independent objects such as minds or ideal entities such as meanings without seeing how these are only abstractions from the concreta that are presented to us in experience, i.e., human beings or actual human language. In all of these cases, the way that one interprets the question of what is fundamental and the role that Husserl assigns to this question is decisive for a correct interpretation and evaluation of Husserl’s position on the issues involved.
This essay discusses Husserl’s brief and Seebohm’s much more extensive comments on the grounding ... more This essay discusses Husserl’s brief and Seebohm’s much more extensive comments on the grounding of several disciplines commonly described under the heading of “the humanities” as sciences in his History as a Science and the System of the Sciences. It asks not just what Husserl and Seebohm say about the grounding of these disciplines as empirical sciences, but also whether we can understand what they have to say by applying what they have to say to the actual practice of these disciplines, thereby extending and refining some of the rather general claims they make about the way they should and do proceed as genuine sciences in the sense indicated above. It does not attempt to do this with all of the humanities but with a few paradigmatic examples, all of which, as academic disciplines, typically take texts and the matters these texts are directed to as the objects of their studies. It thereby becomes clear in the summary of Husserl’s and Seebohm’s positions on the grounding of the Geisteswissenschaften (Husserl’s term, not Seebohm’s) why the notion of interpretation is so important, in particular for literary studies and history, but not so much for applied disciplines such as composition studies or foreign language instruction that are part of humanities departments but do not fit the classic model of the Geisteswissenschaften as theoretical, interpretive disciplines.
Notice. Imprimer la notice. Advancing phenomenology: essays in honor of lester embree (contributi... more Notice. Imprimer la notice. Advancing phenomenology: essays in honor of lester embree (contributions to pheno menology, Vol. 62). Auteur : NENON T. Prix indicatif 166,16 Ajouter au panier le livre de NENON T. Date de parution : 07-2010 Langue : ANGLAIS 390p. ...
This list introduces the leading researchers and scholars in North America who became widely reco... more This list introduces the leading researchers and scholars in North America who became widely recognized for significant contributions to Edmund Husserl scholarship in the 20th century. As a historical list, it also does not include several outstanding younger scholars who have emerged in the twenty-first century.
This chapter introduces the history of the CARP, the “Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenolo... more This chapter introduces the history of the CARP, the “Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology”.
Introduction.- INITIAL AND CONTINUED RECEPTION.- 1. Jose Ortega y Gasset and Human Rights, J.M. D... more Introduction.- INITIAL AND CONTINUED RECEPTION.- 1. Jose Ortega y Gasset and Human Rights, J.M. Diaz Alvarez.- Reading and Rereading Ideen in Japan, T. Tani.- Edith Stein and Autism, K.M. Haney.- Ludwig Ferdinand Clauss and Racialization, R. Bernasconi.- The Ideen and Neo-Kantianism, A. Staiti.- The Distinctive Structure of the Emotions, A.J. Steinbock.- From Natural Attitude to Life-World, D. Moran.- Husserl on the Human Sciences in Ideen II, T.M. Seebohm.- AFTER WORLD WAR I.- The Spanish Speaking World and Jose Vasconcelos, A. Zirion.- The Ideen and Italy, R.Sacconghi.- Martin Heidegger and the Grounding of Action, T.J. Nenon.- Aron Gurwitsch and the Transcendence of the Physical, W. McKenna.- Ludwig Landgrebe and Marginal Consciousness, D. Marcelle.- Dorion Cairns, Empirical Types, and Field of Consciousness, L. Embree.- Ideen I and Eugen Fink, R. Bruzina.- Emmanuel Levinas and a Soliloquy of Light and Reason, N. de Warren.- Jan Patocka and Built Space, J. Dodd.- The Ideen in the Portuguese Speaking World, P.M.S. Alves.- Alfred Schutz and the Problem of Empathy, M. Barber.- Jean-Paul Sartre and Phenomenological Ontology, M. C. Eshleman.- Simone de Beauvoir and Life, U. Bjork.- Merleau-Ponty and Lifeworldly Naturalism, T. Toadvine.- AFTER WORLD WAR II.- Paul Ricoeur and the Praxis of Phenomenology, N. Depraz.- Post-War German Reception of Ideen I and Reflection, S. Geniusas.- Ideen I Confronting its Critics, R.R.P. Lerner.- Jacques Derrida and the Future, V.W. Cisney.- Gilles Deleuze, and Hearing-Oneself-Speak, L. Lawlor.- Thoughts on the Translation of Husserl's Ideen, Erstes Buch, F. Kersten.- Notes on Contributors.
A proper comprehension of the notion of “foundation” is crucial, among other things, for an under... more A proper comprehension of the notion of “foundation” is crucial, among other things, for an understanding of Husserl’s theory of intersubjectivity, his analyses of the relationship between body and mind, his determination of the relationship between nature and our everyday surroundings (Umwelt), and his theory of meaning and language. For example, with regard to Husserl’s treatment of intersubjectivity, commentators and critics have observed that Husserl’s theory is decisively shaped by the thesis that our experience of “others” as subjects is founded upon our experience of them as physical objects, i.e., by his attempt to anchor intersubjective experience in sense experience; or alternatively, with regard to his theories of mind and language, how his theory is based upon a positing of independent objects such as minds or ideal entities such as meanings without seeing how these are only abstractions from the concreta that are presented to us in experience, i.e., human beings or actual human language. In all of these cases, the way that one interprets the question of what is fundamental and the role that Husserl assigns to this question is decisive for a correct interpretation and evaluation of Husserl’s position on the issues involved.
This essay discusses Husserl’s brief and Seebohm’s much more extensive comments on the grounding ... more This essay discusses Husserl’s brief and Seebohm’s much more extensive comments on the grounding of several disciplines commonly described under the heading of “the humanities” as sciences in his History as a Science and the System of the Sciences. It asks not just what Husserl and Seebohm say about the grounding of these disciplines as empirical sciences, but also whether we can understand what they have to say by applying what they have to say to the actual practice of these disciplines, thereby extending and refining some of the rather general claims they make about the way they should and do proceed as genuine sciences in the sense indicated above. It does not attempt to do this with all of the humanities but with a few paradigmatic examples, all of which, as academic disciplines, typically take texts and the matters these texts are directed to as the objects of their studies. It thereby becomes clear in the summary of Husserl’s and Seebohm’s positions on the grounding of the Geisteswissenschaften (Husserl’s term, not Seebohm’s) why the notion of interpretation is so important, in particular for literary studies and history, but not so much for applied disciplines such as composition studies or foreign language instruction that are part of humanities departments but do not fit the classic model of the Geisteswissenschaften as theoretical, interpretive disciplines.
Uploads
Papers by Thomas Nenon