TheMasterofAllHitmans
Welcome!
editHi TheMasterofAllHitmans! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
Hello, I'm Epicgenius. I noticed that you made a comment on the page N (New York City Subway service) that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Epicgenius (talk) 13:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Epicgenius, tell Kew Gardens 613 to stop acting like he knows everything for no real reason then. My reverts are fine. I’ve seen the other articles as well so he has no excuses. TheMasterofAllHitmans (talk) 13:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- I am sorry for not bringing it to the talk page first, and was not trying to act like I know everything. Given that you have been uncivil to me before in edit summaries, I did not assume good faith, and did not want a wholesale removal of the content. It does make sense to have it in a note, and we should do it for other articles. I am open to changes on articles, and have gotten used to changes I didn't initially agree with, such as WP:NC-NYCS. In the spirit of Yom Kippur, I will apologize for not providing a more detailed edit summary explaining the removal and not bringing it to the talk page before reverting it for the second time. Let's work together to improve the quality of transit articles on Wikipedia. Thanks. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 13:09, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Edit summaries
editKnock it off with the personal attacks.-- Ponyobons mots 22:08, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
November 2023
edit Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of Tom and Jerry Tales episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 19:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Multiple changes over the past months or years should be made to the New York City Subway articles
editEpicgenius and Kew Gardens 613, we should remove all mentioning of the Q train at the articles of BMT Fourth Avenue Line express stations and the BMT Sea Beach Line stations. As of December 17, 2023, limited N trains during rush hours operate to/from 96th Street-2nd Avenue. Any thoughts? TheMasterofAllHitmans (talk) 14:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Epicgenius and Kew Gardens 613, I noticed every single Queens Boulevard and 6th Avenue station articles say that the M runs on weekdays till 11 p.m., which isn't true. According to the current timetable, the M to/from Forest Hills-71st Avenue ends early around 9-ish, where service is cut back to Essex Street until 11-ish. Can we please change it to simply "weekdays only" like with the B and W? Thoughts? TheMasterofAllHitmans (talk) 19:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- That sounds good to me. In any case, we do not outline the exact times a service stops running for any other time periods aside from weekday-only services. Epicgenius (talk) 19:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Epicgenius and Kew Gardens 613, I don't know how to edit the infobox on any of the station articles featuring the M to change it to say "weekdays only". Can you please show me how? Also, another thing I want to bring up is can we please remove all mentioning of the <F>? It's just simply two trains a day anyways. It should only be briefly mentioned in the notes and lede section of the article. Otherwise, it's just simply one single F service altogether. Thoughts? TheMasterofAllHitmans (talk) 20:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- For the M, you have to edit all {{NYCS ...}} templates where the M train is mentioned, e.g. {{NYCS Queens}}. I'm actually going to do this right now.For the F, that one might be more controversial and should probably be discussed somewhere like WT:NYCPT. Although it is true that there's only only two <F> trips in each direction per day, they still are signed separately from the rest of the route, similar to the <6> and <7>. – Epicgenius (talk) 22:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Epicgenius, thank you so much. I appreciate all of this. I will learn how to properly edit the template myself. As for the F, I'll definitely bring it up there so that I can see what everyone else says. TheMasterofAllHitmans (talk) 02:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- For the M, you have to edit all {{NYCS ...}} templates where the M train is mentioned, e.g. {{NYCS Queens}}. I'm actually going to do this right now.For the F, that one might be more controversial and should probably be discussed somewhere like WT:NYCPT. Although it is true that there's only only two <F> trips in each direction per day, they still are signed separately from the rest of the route, similar to the <6> and <7>. – Epicgenius (talk) 22:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Epicgenius and Kew Gardens 613, I don't know how to edit the infobox on any of the station articles featuring the M to change it to say "weekdays only". Can you please show me how? Also, another thing I want to bring up is can we please remove all mentioning of the <F>? It's just simply two trains a day anyways. It should only be briefly mentioned in the notes and lede section of the article. Otherwise, it's just simply one single F service altogether. Thoughts? TheMasterofAllHitmans (talk) 20:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- That sounds good to me. In any case, we do not outline the exact times a service stops running for any other time periods aside from weekday-only services. Epicgenius (talk) 19:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
"Adventure Time"
editHey, I just wanted to reach out about AT edits. The only reason I reverted was because we don't have a source saying the show is "one of the most successful original series on Cartoon Network". Now, I wouldn't' be surprised if there is one out there, but the onus is on us, the editors, to find that source before we add it in there. Do you have any thoughts about where a source like this might be found? If we can track it down, we can assuredly include that line. But right now, I fear it veers a bit too close to original research. (And for the record, I'm a huge AT fan, and I agree that it probably is one of the network's biggest hits. That said, I don't want to slant the article unfairly and be too flattering.)--Gen. Quon[Talk] 22:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)