Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

New Page Patrol survey

edit
 

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello PAVA11! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with a skoal berry other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

edit

WikiCup 2016 November newsletter: Final results

edit

The final round of the 2016 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2016 WikiCup top three finalists:

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:

  • Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a three-way tie with themselves for two FAs in each of R2, R3, and R5).
  • Good Article – MPJ-DK had 14 GAs promoted in R3.
  • Featured List – England  Calvin999 (submissions) produced 2 FLs in R2
  • Featured Pictures – Adam Cuerden restored 18 images to FP status in R4.
  • Featured Portal – Yakutsk  SSTflyer (submissions) produced the only FPO of the Cup in R2.
  • Featured Topic – Connecticut  Cyclonebiskit (submissions) and Calvin were each responsible for one FT in R3 and R2, respectively.
  • Good Topic – MPJ-DK created a GT with 9 GAs in R5.
  • Did You Know – MPJ-DK put 53 DYKs on the main page in R4.
  • In The News – India  Dharmadhyaksha (submissions) and New York City  Muboshgu (submissions), each with 5 ITN, both in R4.
  • Good Article Review – MPJ-DK completed 61 GARs in R2.

Over the course of the 2016 WikiCup the following content was added to Wikipedia (only reporting on fixed value categories): 17 Featured Articles, 183 Good Articles, 8 Featured Lists, 87 Featured Pictures, 40 In The News, and 321 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2017 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup

edit
WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup
 

Greetings, all!

We would like to announce the start of the 4th GA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing of Good article nominations! Thus far, there have been three GA Cups, which were successful in reaching our goals of significantly reducing the traditionally long queue at GAN, so we're doing it again. Currently, there are over 400 nominations listed. We hope that we can again make an impact this time.

The 4th GA Cup will begin on November 1, 2016. Four rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on February 28, 2017), but this may change based on participant numbers. We may take a break in December for the holidays, depending on the results of a poll of our participants taken shortly after the competition begins. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same, as will the scoring.

Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on November 14, 2016. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now!

If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the judges.

Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. We apologize for the delay in sending out this message until after the competition has started. Thank you to Krishna Chaitanya Velaga for aiding in getting this message out.

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

edit

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Grsz11. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

edit

WikiCup December newsletter: WikiCup 2017

edit

On 1 January 2017, WikiCup 2017 (the 10th Annual WikiCup) will begin. This year we are trying something a little different – monetary prizes.

For the WC2017 the prizes will be as follows (amounts are based in US$ and will be awarded in the form of an online Amazon gift certificate):

  • First place – $200
  • Second & Third place – $50 each
  • Category prizes – $25 per category (which will be limited to FA, FL, FP, GA, and DYK for 2017). Winning a category prize does not require making it to the final round.

Note: Monetary prizes are a one-year experiment for 2017 and may or may not be continued in the future. In order to be eligible to receive any of the prizes above, the competing Wikipedia account must have a valid/active email address.

After two years as a WikiCup judge, Figureskatingfan is stepping down. We thank her for her contributions as a WikiCup judge. We are pleased to announce that our newest judge is two-time WikiCup champion Cwmhiraeth.

The judges for the 2017 WikiCup are Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email).

Signups are open now and will remain open until 5 February 2017. You can sign up here.

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

edit

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Burlington Rangers (talk) Add sources
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  AA Region III (talk) Add sources
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Patrick Henry High School-Glade Spring (talk) Add sources
1,193 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Anal beads (talk) Add sources
1,849 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B  Rosary (talk) Add sources
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  AA Region II (talk) Add sources
28 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Hampton High School (Virginia) (talk) Cleanup
19 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Oscar F. Smith High School (talk) Cleanup
39 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  West Potomac High School (talk) Cleanup
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Pulaski County High School (Virginia) (talk) Expand
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  James River High School (Buchanan, Virginia) (talk) Expand
8 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  James River High School (Chesterfield County, Virginia) (talk) Expand
20 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Green Run High School (talk) Unencyclopaedic
22 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Maggie L. Walker Governor's School for Government and International Studies (talk) Unencyclopaedic
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Academic Competition for Excellence (talk) Unencyclopaedic
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Virginia (talk) Merge
18 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Parque de Atracciones de Madrid (talk) Merge
60 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B  Virginian Railway (talk) Merge
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Len Forkas (talk) Wikify
31 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Hampton Roads Transit (talk) Wikify
83 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Washington-Lee High School (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub  N. Douglas Hunt (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub  Association of Pennsylvania State College and University Faculties (talk) Orphan
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Robert Alai (talk) Orphan
34 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Robert Biedroń (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Western Branch, Virginia (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Gary Lavelle (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Narrows High School (talk) Stub
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Hurley High School (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Bath County High School (Virginia) (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

edit

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
54 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Bethel High School (Virginia) (talk) Add sources
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  AAA Western Valley District (talk) Add sources
8 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Lee High School (Lee County, Virginia) (talk) Add sources
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Bull Run District (talk) Add sources
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  I. C. Norcom High School (talk) Add sources
30 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Osbourn High School (talk) Add sources
22 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  L. C. Bird High School (talk) Cleanup
28 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Phoebus High School (talk) Cleanup
14 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Turner Ashby High School (talk) Cleanup
40 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start  Warwick High School (Newport News) (talk) Expand
47 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Chantilly High School (talk) Expand
350 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA  Al-Mourabitoun (militant group) (talk) Expand
29 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Missouri State High School Activities Association (talk) Unencyclopaedic
15 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Heritage High School (Leesburg, Virginia) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Hanover High School (Mechanicsville, Virginia) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Sjaak Rijke (talk) Merge
165 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C  Celtic harp (talk) Merge
1,570 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B  Medical cannabis (talk) Merge
90 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Gardener of Eden (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start  William Gordon Mathews (talk) Wikify
473 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B  Army of Northern Virginia (talk) Wikify
12 Quality: High, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: GA  The Grammy Museum Mississippi (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Timeline of Libyan insurgency (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Mundellsville, Virginia (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  AA Highlands District (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Eastern View High School (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub  WXL60 (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Chilhowie High School (talk) Stub
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Catlett, Virginia (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Twin Springs High School (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:40, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

List of other South Park residents listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of other South Park residents. Since you had some involvement with the List of other South Park residents redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 06:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

edit

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  National District (VHSL) (talk) Add sources
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Cedar Run District (talk) Add sources
26 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  John Randolph Tucker High School (talk) Add sources
14 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Varina High School (talk) Add sources
66 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C  Overlanding (talk) Add sources
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Stuarts Draft High School (talk) Add sources
890 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B  Lynchburg, Virginia (talk) Cleanup
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Commonwealth Governor's School (talk) Cleanup
32 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B  Southern West Virginia (talk) Cleanup
9 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Warren County High School (Virginia) (talk) Expand
34 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  State Bar of Texas (talk) Expand
25 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Scouting in Virginia (talk) Expand
32 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Gar-Field Senior High School (talk) Unencyclopaedic
34 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA  Fairfax Connector (talk) Unencyclopaedic
11 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Newport News High School (talk) Unencyclopaedic
54 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  York River (Virginia) (talk) Merge
1,175 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B  Islamic terrorism (talk) Merge
807 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B  Swimming pool (talk) Merge
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Holston High School (talk) Wikify
14 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C  Curtsy App and Blog (talk) Wikify
41 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub  Danger & Eggs (talk) Wikify
80 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Mendota Trail (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  May 2015 Garissa ambush (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Potomac Crossing (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Castlewood High School (talk) Stub
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  National Route 13 (Morocco) (talk) Stub
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Culpeper County High School (talk) Stub
20 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Courtland High School (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Clintwood High School (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  I-n-Azaoua (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

edit

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter

edit

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:

  • Scotland  Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
  • European Union  Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
  • Japan  1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
  • South Australia  Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
18 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Christiansburg High School (talk) Add sources
15 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Churchland High School (talk) Add sources
20 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Manchester High School (Virginia) (talk) Add sources
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Kecoughtan High School (talk) Add sources
24 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Blacksburg High School (talk) Add sources
31 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Mills E. Godwin High School (talk) Add sources
11 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Jamestown High School (Virginia) (talk) Cleanup
171 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania (talk) Cleanup
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Wilson Memorial High School (talk) Cleanup
217 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Minnesota State High School League (talk) Expand
11 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B  Big Beaver Falls Area School District (talk) Expand
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Monticello Freeway (talk) Expand
20 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C  Knowledge Bowl (talk) Unencyclopaedic
2,053 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA  Richmond, Virginia (talk) Unencyclopaedic
26 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  R. Gerald Turner (talk) Unencyclopaedic
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  2011 Timbuktu kidnapping (talk) Merge
89 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Athletic director (talk) Merge
9 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA  Building the Virginian Railway (talk) Merge
44 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub  Little Big Awesome (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Parkview Cross Country Course (talk) Wikify
151 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA  Ansar Dine (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub  Chincoteague Bay Field Station (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Heartwood – The Southwest Virginia Artisan Gateway (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Joel Dolinski (talk) Orphan
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Kings Park, Virginia (talk) Stub
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Hopewell High School (Virginia) (talk) Stub
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Grundy Senior High School (talk) Stub
15 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Thomas Jefferson High School (Richmond, Virginia) (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Twin Valley High School (Virginia) (talk) Stub
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  John S. Battle High School (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:25, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
46 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Stone Bridge High School (talk) Add sources
20 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B  Dulles District (talk) Add sources
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Southampton High School (Courtland, Virginia) (talk) Add sources
21 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Salem High School (Salem, Virginia) (talk) Add sources
255 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (talk) Add sources
97 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  George C. Marshall High School (talk) Add sources
89 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Lake Braddock Secondary School (talk) Cleanup
257 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B  Doonesbury (talk) Cleanup
25 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Chaambi Operations (talk) Cleanup
179 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Ansar al-Sharia (Yemen) (talk) Expand
38 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Greensburg (TV series) (talk) Expand
59 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Georgia High School Association (talk) Expand
27 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Archbishop John Carroll High School (talk) Unencyclopaedic
149 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA  Fairfax County Public Schools (talk) Unencyclopaedic
28 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Strath Haven High School (talk) Unencyclopaedic
346 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C  Sigma Phi Epsilon (talk) Merge
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  2013 FFSA season (talk) Merge
27 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Portsmouth (instrumental) (talk) Merge
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Mutea Iringo (talk) Wikify
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub  SEC Rewind (talk) Wikify
904 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA  College basketball (talk) Wikify
20 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub  PASSHE Study Abroad (talk) Orphan
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub  Ann Minnick (talk) Orphan
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Andrew Tatarsky (talk) Orphan
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Peninsula Pilots (minor league team) (talk) Stub
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  New Kent High School (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  West Point High School (Virginia) (talk) Stub
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Seth Grove Stadium (talk) Stub
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Prince George High School (talk) Stub
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Ziz Gorges (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:44, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2017 WikiCup newsletter

edit

The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:

  • Scotland  Cas Liber, led the field with five featured articles, four on birds and one on astronomy, and a total score of 2049, half of which came from bonus points.
  • Japan  1989 was in second place with 826 points, 466 of which were bonus points. 1989 has claimed points mostly relating to anime and Japanese-related articles.
  • South Australia  Peacemaker67 took third place with two FAs, one GA and seven GARs, mostly on naval vessels or military personnel, scoring 543 points.
  • Other contestants who scored over 400 points were Freikorp, Carbrera, and Czar. Of course all these points are now wiped out and the 32 remaining contestants start again from zero in round 3.

Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.

So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

edit

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

edit

WikiCup 2017 July newsletter

edit

The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

edit

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

edit

WikiCup 2017 September newsletter

edit

Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

edit

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

edit

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

edit

WikiCup 2017 November newsletter: Final results

edit

The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:

  • Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a two-way tie with themselves for an astonishing five FAs in R2 and R4).
  • Good Article – Adityavagarwal had 14 GAs promoted in R5.
  • Featured List – Canada  Bloom6132 (submissions) and Japan  1989 (submissions) both produced 2 FLs in R2
  • Featured Pictures – Cascadia  SounderBruce (submissions) improved an image to FP status in R5, the only FP this year.
  • Featured Topic – Denmark  MPJ-DK (submissions) has the only FT of the Cup in R3.
  • Good Topic – Four different editors created a GT in R2, R3 and R4.
  • Did You Know – Adityavagarwal had 22 DYKs on the main page in R5.
  • In The News – India  MBlaze Lightning (submissions) had 14 ITN on the main page in R2.
  • Good Article Review – India  Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (submissions) completed 31 GARs in R1.

Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.

Regarding the prize vouchers - @Adityavagarwal, Vanamonde93, Casliber, Bloom6132, 1989, and SounderBruce: please send Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2018

edit

So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

edit

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, PAVA11. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,455 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Elijah Muhammad (talk) Add sources
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Patrick Henry High School-Glade Spring (talk) Add sources
28 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Loudoun Valley High School (talk) Add sources
63 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Wilbert Tucker Woodson High School (talk) Add sources
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Burlington Rangers (talk) Add sources
11 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  James River High School (Chesterfield County, Virginia) (talk) Add sources
2,727 Quality: High, Assessed class: GA, Predicted class: GA  Kelly Kelly (talk) Cleanup
39 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Hampton High School (Virginia) (talk) Cleanup
38 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Oscar F. Smith High School (talk) Cleanup
14 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Pulaski County High School (Virginia) (talk) Expand
80 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Southwest Virginia (talk) Expand
52 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  U.S. Route 460 in Virginia (talk) Expand
21 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Green Run High School (talk) Unencyclopaedic
32 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B  Maggie L. Walker Governor's School for Government and International Studies (talk) Unencyclopaedic
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Academic Competition for Excellence (talk) Unencyclopaedic
818 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Knight of Cups (film) (talk) Merge
14 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B  Central Valley School District (Pennsylvania) (talk) Merge
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C  That Roundhouse (talk) Merge
20 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B  Hampton Roads Transit (talk) Wikify
64 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Washington-Lee High School (talk) Wikify
79 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B  Intercollegiate sports team champions (talk) Wikify
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Robert Alai (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Association of Pennsylvania State College and University Faculties (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub  N. Douglas Hunt (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Western Branch, Virginia (talk) Stub
126 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Vadim Shipachyov (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Bath County High School (Virginia) (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Narrows High School (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Lloyd C. Bird (talk) Stub
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Wilcox County High School (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:33, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kyle Rank (ice hockey, born 1982) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyle Rank (ice hockey, born 1982) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Rank (ice hockey, born 1982) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 17:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

edit

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Bull Run District (talk) Add sources
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Blue Ridge District (talk) Add sources
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  John I. Burton High School (talk) Add sources
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Lee High School (Lee County, Virginia) (talk) Add sources
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Carroll County High School (Virginia) (talk) Add sources
756 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Mobile phone tracking (talk) Add sources
9 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Turner Ashby High School (talk) Cleanup
24 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Missouri State High School Activities Association (talk) Cleanup
45 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  South Lakes High School (talk) Cleanup
48 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Chantilly High School (talk) Expand
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start  Warwick High School (Virginia) (talk) Expand
49 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA  Al-Mourabitoun (militant group) (talk) Expand
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Hanover High School (Mechanicsville, Virginia) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
39 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C  Virginia Port Authority (talk) Unencyclopaedic
37 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Colonial Parkway (talk) Unencyclopaedic
47 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  J. E. B. Stuart High School (talk) Merge
282 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B  Major League Baseball All-Star Game (talk) Merge
89 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Thinning (talk) Merge
60 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Gardener of Eden (talk) Wikify
54 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  The Stinky & Dirty Show (talk) Wikify
62 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C  Virginian Railway (talk) Wikify
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Timeline of Libyan insurgency (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Mundellsville, Virginia (talk) Orphan
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Al-Khawaneej (talk) Orphan
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Colonial Heights High School (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Chilhowie High School (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub  WXL60 (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Auburn High School (Virginia) (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Twin Springs High School (talk) Stub
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Gary Lavelle (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:33, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

edit

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  AAA Western Valley District (talk) Add sources
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C  National District (VHSL) (talk) Add sources
21 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Varina High School (talk) Add sources
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Holston High School (talk) Add sources
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Richlands High School (Richlands, Virginia) (talk) Add sources
25 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Osbourn High School (talk) Add sources
42 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  West Potomac High School (talk) Cleanup
33 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Centreville High School (Fairfax County, Virginia) (talk) Cleanup
33 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Falls Church High School (talk) Cleanup
28 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Robert E. Lee High School (Fairfax County, Virginia) (talk) Expand
20 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Ansar al-Sham (talk) Expand
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Warren County High School (Virginia) (talk) Expand
33 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA  Fairfax Connector (talk) Unencyclopaedic
33 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Gar-Field Senior High School (talk) Unencyclopaedic
70 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Henry W. Grady High School (talk) Unencyclopaedic
50 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Al-Qaeda in Bosnia and Herzegovina (talk) Merge
522 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C  Apsis (talk) Merge
44 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C  Handball (school) (talk) Merge
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Abacab tour (talk) Wikify
206 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Islamic extremism (talk) Wikify
480 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B  Artificial turf (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Curtsy App and Blog (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  May 2015 Garissa ambush (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Alès Film Festival (talk) Orphan
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Hurley High School (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Castlewood High School (talk) Stub
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Stuarts Draft High School (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  AA Highlands District (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Clintwood High School (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Jonesville High School (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

edit

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

edit

WikiCup 2018 March newsletter

edit

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.

Our top scorers in round 1 were:

  • United States  Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
  • Germany  FrB.TG , a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
  • India  Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.
  • United States  Ceranthor, India  Numerounovedant, Minnesota  Carbrera, Netherlands  Farang Rak Tham and Romania  Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

edit

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

edit

WikiCup 2018 May newsletter

edit

The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:

  • Scotland  Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
  • Republic of Texas  Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
  • India  Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
  • Cascadia (independence movement)  SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
  • United States  Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
  • San Francisco  Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
  • South Carolina  Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs

So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

edit

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

edit

WikiCup 2018 July newsletter

edit

The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • South Carolina  Courcelles, a first time contestant, with 1756 points, a tally built largely on 27 GAs related to the Olympics
  • Scotland  Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three GAs on natural history and astronomy topics
  • Cascadia (independence movement)  SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with a variety of submissions related to transport in the state of Washington

Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk), Vanamonde (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

edit

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

edit

WikiCup 2018 September newsletter

edit

The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:

  • South Carolina  Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
  • Hel, Poland  Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
  • Scotland  Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
  • Other contestants who qualified for the final round were Marshall Islands  Nova Crystallis, Republic of Texas  Iazyges, Cascadia (independence movement)  SounderBruce, Wales  Kosack and United States  Ceranthor.

During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
20 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Blacksburg High School (talk) Add sources
738 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C  Black triangle (UFO) (talk) Add sources
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Parry McCluer High School (talk) Add sources
25 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Cosby High School (talk) Add sources
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Floyd County High School (talk) Add sources
19 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  I. C. Norcom High School (talk) Add sources
40 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA  West Virginia High School Football State Championships and playoff history (talk) Cleanup
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Wilson Memorial High School (talk) Cleanup
198 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C  Herndon, Virginia (talk) Cleanup
53 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B  Minnesota State High School League (talk) Expand
7 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  U.S. Route 19 in Virginia (talk) Expand
61 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C  U.S. Route 29 in Virginia (talk) Expand
19 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C  Knowledge Bowl (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,799 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA  Richmond, Virginia (talk) Unencyclopaedic
107 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Jonathan Alter (talk) Unencyclopaedic
788 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B  University of South Carolina (talk) Merge
414 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C  Web television (talk) Merge
1,765 Quality: High, Assessed class: GA, Predicted class: GA  Alaska Airlines (talk) Merge
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Midland Trail High School (talk) Wikify
1,155 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B  Mohammed VI of Morocco (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start  William Gordon Mathews (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  StreamWatch (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub  Chincoteague Bay Field Station (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  46th AWGIE Awards (talk) Orphan
78 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  NIPRNet (talk) Stub
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Roanoke County Public Schools (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Grundy Senior High School (talk) Stub
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Twin Valley High School (Virginia) (talk) Stub
35 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C  Austrian Anschluss referendum, 1938 (talk) Stub
98 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Cumberland Mountains (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:37, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

edit

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
77 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  National Unity Party (Canada) (talk) Add sources
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Dulles District (talk) Add sources
11 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Spotswood High School (Virginia) (talk) Add sources
20 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Salem High School (Salem, Virginia) (talk) Add sources
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Kecoughtan High School (talk) Add sources
23 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Lord Botetourt High School (talk) Add sources
539 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B  Hampton Roads (talk) Cleanup
74 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Lake Braddock Secondary School (talk) Cleanup
179 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA  Chantilly, Virginia (talk) Cleanup
141 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA  Fairfax County Public Schools (talk) Expand
33 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Richmond Public Schools (talk) Expand
8 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Big Beaver Falls Area School District (talk) Expand
349 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B  Pakistan–United States relations (talk) Unencyclopaedic
863 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Michael Mann (talk) Unencyclopaedic
37 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Riduan Isamuddin (talk) Unencyclopaedic
30 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Prime Ministerial Limousine (talk) Merge
359 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Red Bull Arena (Leipzig) (talk) Merge
92 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Ribbon of Saint George (talk) Merge
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Mutea Iringo (talk) Wikify
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub  SEC Rewind (talk) Wikify
92 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Ansar Dine (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Adam Banton (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Alfred Amadu Conteh (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Amina Belouizdad (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Peninsula Pilots (minor league team) (talk) Stub
33 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Northern Virginia Majestics (talk) Stub
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  John S. Battle High School (talk) Stub
29 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Western Shore of Maryland (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub  Prince George High School (talk) Stub
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Churchland High School (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:44, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

edit

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Pulaski County High School (Virginia) (talk) Add sources
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Academic Competition for Excellence (talk) Add sources
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Commonwealth District (VHSL) (talk) Add sources
20 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C  Loudoun Valley High School (talk) Add sources
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Northwestern District (talk) Add sources
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Patrick Henry High School-Glade Spring (talk) Add sources
27 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Hampton High School (Virginia) (talk) Cleanup
50 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B  Maggie L. Walker Governor's School for Government and International Studies (talk) Cleanup
45 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Oscar F. Smith High School (talk) Cleanup
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  James River High School (Chesterfield County, Virginia) (talk) Expand
80 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B  Southwest Virginia (talk) Expand
123 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Georgia High School Association (talk) Expand
25 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Green Run High School (talk) Unencyclopaedic
10 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Pocket Athletic Conference (talk) Unencyclopaedic
9 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Newport News High School (talk) Unencyclopaedic
548 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  University of Dhaka (talk) Merge
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub  Interactive accommodation process (talk) Merge
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Rectangular mask short-time Fourier transform (talk) Merge
73 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Washington-Lee High School (talk) Wikify
27 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C  Hampton Roads Transit (talk) Wikify
95 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B  Intercollegiate sports team champions (talk) Wikify
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Robert Alai (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub  N. Douglas Hunt (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start  Association of Pennsylvania State College and University Faculties (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Western Branch, Virginia (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C  Lloyd C. Bird (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start  Washington and Lee High School (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  La Pine Senior High School (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  Narrows High School (talk) Stub
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start  The Trail of the Lonesome Pine (1916 film) (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2018 November newsletter

edit

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is South Carolina  Courcelles (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:

  1. South Carolina  Courcelles (submissions)
  2. Wales  Kosack (submissions)
  3. Hel, Poland  Kees08 (submissions)
  4.   SounderBruce (submissions)
  5. Scotland  Cas Liber (submissions)
  6. Marshall Islands  Nova Crystallis (submissions)
  7. Republic of Texas  Iazyges (submissions)
  8. United States  Ceranthor (submissions)


All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants:

Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email) and Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email).

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, PAVA11. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

edit

Orphaned non-free image File:Joseph Serge Miot.jpg

edit
⚠ 

Thanks for uploading File:Joseph Serge Miot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

edit

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!

edit

Hello and Happy New Year!

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

edit

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

edit

WikiCup 2019 March newsletter

edit

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • United States  L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
  •   Adam Cuerden, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
  • Denmark  MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
  • United States  Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
  •   Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
  • Ohio  Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

edit

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

edit

WikiCup 2019 May newsletter

edit

The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:

  • Scotland  Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
  • Wales  Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.
  •   Adam Cuerden (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
  • Kingdom of Prussia  Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.

Other notable performances were put in by Chicago  Barkeep49 with six GAs, United States  Ceranthor, England  Lee Vilenski, and Saskatchewan  Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and Denmark  MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.

So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

edit

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

edit

WikiCup 2019 July newsletter

edit

The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • Norfolk Island  Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
  • South Carolina  Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
  • Cascadia (independence movement)  SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
  • United States  Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics

Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

edit

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

edit

WikiCup 2019 September newsletter

edit

The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

edit

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

edit

WikiCup 2019 November newsletter

edit

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly  Adam Cuerden (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 91 featured pictures, including 32 in the final round. Our finalists this year were:

  1. Better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly  Adam Cuerden (submissions) with 964 points
  2. England  Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 899 points
  3. Norfolk Island  Casliber (submissions) with 817 points
  4. Wales  Kosack (submissions) with 691 points
  5. Washington (state)  SounderBruce (submissions) with 388 points
  6. Antarctica  Enwebb (submissions) with 146 points
  7. United States  Usernameunique (submissions) with 145 points
  8. Indonesia  HaEr48 (submissions) with 74 points

All those who reached the final will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

We have opened a scoring discussion on whether the rules and scoring need adjustment. Please have your say. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2020 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth 14:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

edit

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

edit

Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup!

edit

Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

edit

WikiCup 2020 March newsletter

edit

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 57 contestants qualifying. We have abolished the groups this year, so to qualify for Round 3 you will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • New York (state)  Epicgenius, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with a featured article, five good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 895 points.
  • England  Gog the Mild came next with 464 points, from a featured article, two good articles and a number of reviews, the main theme being naval warfare.
  • United States  Raymie was in third place with 419 points, garnered from one good article and an impressive 34 DYKs on radio and TV stations in the United States.
  • Somerset  Harrias came next at 414, with a featured article and three good articles, an English civil war battle specialist.
  • Pirate flag  CaptainEek was in fifth place with 405 points, mostly garnered from bringing Cactus wren to featured article status.
  • The top ten contestants at the end of Round 1 all scored over 200 points; they also included United States  L293D, Venezuela  Kingsif, Antarctica  Enwebb, England  Lee Vilenski and Nepal  CAPTAIN MEDUSA. Seven of the top ten contestants in Round 1 are new to the WikiCup.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. In Round 1 there were four featured articles, one featured list and two featured pictures, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. Between them, contestants completed 127 good article reviews, nearly a hundred more than the 43 good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Contestants also claimed for 40 featured article / featured list reviews, and most even remembered to mention their WikiCup participation in their reviews (a requirement).

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

edit

WikiCup newsletter correction

edit

There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter; United States  L293D should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead, United States  Dunkleosteus77 should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

edit

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

edit

WikiCup 2020 May newsletter

edit

The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

  • New York (state)  Epicgenius, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points
  • England  Gog the Mild, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
  • Botswana  The Rambling Man, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews
  • Somerset  Harrias, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews
  • England  Lee Vilenski with 869 points, Gondor  Hog Farm with 801, Venezuela  Kingsif with 719, Cascadia (independence movement)  SounderBruce with 710, United States  Dunkleosteus77 with 608 and Mexico  MX with 515.

The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

edit

WikiCup 2020 July newsletter

edit

The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • New York (state)  Epicgenius, with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points
  • Botswana  The Rambling Man , with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs
  • England  Gog the Mild, a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.

Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally, Denmark  MPJ-DK added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Britannia

edit

I've warned SethRuebens for personal attacks, since they're going down the rabbithole of "since you oppose my edits, you must be working for them ..." Acroterion (talk) 16:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ah yes, that classic. PAVA11 (talk) 17:19, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
You think if we stop responding to him (until he comes up with an actual ref), he might get bored talking with himself? Schazjmd (talk) 18:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
No, but I'm giving it a shot. XD PAVA11 (talk) 18:42, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
I will too. Schazjmd (talk) 19:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Likewise. Thanks for warning them, Acroterion. Rabbit-hole indeed... Tvcameraop (talk) 19:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi guys/gals, can you provide links to the personal attacks you're referring to? The last thing I want to do is offend people here and I genuinely believe I've acted within the boundaries of respect the site demands. Many thanks and apologies if you're offended. SRSethRuebens (talk) 22:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2020 September newsletter

edit

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

  • Free Hong Kong  Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
  • Indonesia HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
  • England  Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.

Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2020 November newsletter

edit

The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is England  Lee Vilenski (submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by England  Gog the Mild (submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. Botswana  The Rambling Man (submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with New York (state)  Epicgenius (submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.

The other finalists were Gondor  Hog Farm (submissions), Indonesia  HaEr48 (submissions), Somerset  Harrias (submissions) and Free Hong Kong  Bloom6132 (submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!

edit

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2021 March newsletter

edit

Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • New York (state)  Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
  • Republic of Venice  Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
  • Scotland  ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
  • Rwanda  Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
  •   Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
  • Botswana  The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
  •   Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
  •   Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
  • United States  Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
  • England  Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2021 May newsletter

edit

The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in Round 2 were:

  • Botswana  The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
  • New York (state)  Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
  • Republic of Venice  Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
  •   Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
  • England  Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
  • England  Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
  •   Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
  •   Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.

Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2021 July newsletter

edit

The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:

  • Botswana  The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
  • New York (state)  Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
  • Republic of Venice  Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
  • England  Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
  •   Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
  • Zulu (International Code of Signals)  BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.

In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter

edit

The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, Botswana  The Rambling Man and New York (state)  Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Republic of Venice  Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are   Gog the Mild, England  Lee Vilenski, Zulu (International Code of Signals)  BennyOnTheLoose, Rwanda  Amakuru and   Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. George Floyd mural  Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2021 November newsletter

edit

The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is Botswana  The Rambling Man (submissions), who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:

  1. Botswana  The Rambling Man (submissions) with 5072 points
  2. England  Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 3276 points
  3. Rwanda  Amakuru (submissions) with 3197 points
  4. New York (state)  Epicgenius (submissions) with 1611 points
  5.   Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1571 points
  6. Zulu (International Code of Signals)  BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 1420 points
  7.   Hog Farm (submissions) with 1043 points
  8. Republic of Venice  Bloom6132 (submissions) with 528 points

All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

edit

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

edit

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

edit

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • New York (state)  Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
  • Christmas Island  AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
  • Kingdom of Scotland  Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
  • Philadelphia  GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
  • United Nations  Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
  •   SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
  • United Nations  Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

edit

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • New York (state)  Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
  • Christmas Island  AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
  • Kingdom of Scotland  Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
  • Philadelphia  GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
  • United Nations  Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
  •   SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
  • United Nations  Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2022 May newsletter

edit

The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

  1. New York (state)  Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
  2. Christmas Island  AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
  3. Kingdom of Scotland  Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
  4.   Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
  5.   Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
  6. United States  Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
  7. England  Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

edit
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives.
Click here to opt out of any future messages.

(t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2022 July newsletter

edit

The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • Zulu (International Code of Signals)  BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.
  • Kingdom of Scotland  Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
  •   Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.

Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2022 September newsletter

edit

WikiCup 2022 September newsletter

edit

The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2022 November newsletter

edit

The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is

  • England  Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by
  • Kingdom of Scotland  Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was
  • Zulu (International Code of Signals)  BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by
  • New York City  Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were
  •   Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations,
  • United Nations  Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
  • Chicago  PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
  • Toronto  Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.

During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.

  • England  Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round.
  • United Nations  Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
  •   Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition.
  • Toronto  Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4.
  • New York (state)  Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1.
  •   SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1.
  • England  Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5.
  •   Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall.
  •   Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall.
  • Kingdom of Scotland  Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!

edit

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

You have been removed from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send due to inactivity

edit

Hi PAVA11! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 2 years.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Bill Hahn

edit

Information icon  Hello, PAVA11. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bill Hahn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Bill Hahn

edit
 

Hello, PAVA11. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bill Hahn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:13, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hershey Entertainment and Resorts Company

edit

 Template:Hershey Entertainment and Resorts Company has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merger of Template:WikiProject Barack Obama

edit

 Template:WikiProject Barack Obama has been nominated for merging with Template:WikiProject United States. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 15:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply