Talk:Lake Braddock Secondary School

Should Principal Dave Thomas be listed as an alum? He graduated in 1986, and in the early 1990s he came back as a teacher, became an administrator, and is now principal. 72.83.145.163 (talk) 04:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thomas does not meet WP:N. If he does please cite it, I could not find it. -- Lucas20 (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Doesn't the ludicrous length of the main hall warrant mention? Those sevies and eight-balls had to walk a long way to get to gym class.71.63.86.153 (talk) 01:05, 23 December 2007 (UTC)wouldn't knowReply

Problem is, with renovation the middle school is now next to the cafeteria and the gym. Maybe the hall is worth discussion, but no longer because of the distance middle schoolers have to walk. 71.126.138.251 (talk) 23:28, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Image:Lake Braddock Secondary School logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why do on air staff members from local radio station WJFK keep being deleted? The rationale used by the latest editor is that "being a local dj does not constitute being notable." So being a local celebrity does not make one notable? I don't see how that makes any sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.48.116.135 (talk) 02:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

You ask if being a local celebrity makes a person notable. Basically, no; not just by itself. The article at Wikipedia:Notability (people) outlines the rules for who should and shouldn't be included. This is what it says for entertainers:

Actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and television personalities:

* With significant roles in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions.

* Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.

* Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.

Also, in general:

A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject.

Bret Oliviero, with exactly zero Google results, probably doesn't fit either of these categories. Chris Kinard, as the director of the show, maybe. But you have to prove it; find some reliable sources saying he's notable. If, for example, you found a source saying he has a significant cult following, that would qualify him for notability. FlamingSilmaril (talk) 23:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I just realized I made a spelling mistake in Bret Oliverio's name when searching for him. Upon further consideration, he might be notable too, but you still need reliable sources. Again, sorry about that. FlamingSilmaril (talk) 23:34, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think we should shy away from including the Kory incident in the article, and I feel we should remove the link to the video. 72.66.125.52 (talk) 02:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I was none too comfortable with this either. It should at least be reworded from "national media attention" to something a little less sympathetic towards him (and the video should probably be removed too). Flami/khlkkkngSilmaril (talk) 14:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

"a little less sympathetic towards him"?? are you kidding me. who exactly should it be sympathetic to, the wife or the administration. exactly why should the incident be excluded from the page, the whole point of wikipedia is to provide information, that incident put Lake Braddock on the map for better or worse. and exactly how are people saying that its non-notable??? are either of you fcps admins by any chance? the story had a bigger spot on the front page of the washington post than heath ledger's death! exactly how is that not notable. national media attention is in no way a biased phrase, it carries no connotation. and the least you can do is sign the name correctly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.158.29 (talk) 03:47, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes... it was notable then. But can you find a single mention of it in the past few days? No? Well then there ya go. FCPS admin? Far from it. Queerbubbles | Leave me Some Love 13:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

kl; /;kn/

I have left a message on your talk page regarding your personal attack in your signature. I would suggest changing it. Queerbubbles | Leave me Some Love 21:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Since there is special mention of the musical accomplishments, shouldn't Mirabal's accomplishments be noted as well? The drama program is an award winning one... Queerbubbles | Leave me Some Love 17:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why isn't it mentioned? Well, because nobody's added it yet. If you want to, go ahead. If you see something that should be added, by all means go for it. You seem to know more about this than I do, certainly. FlamingSilmaril (talk) 21:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Added... feel free to throw in anything that I left out or sounds awkward. The page needs some reorganizing, though. Queerbubbles | Leave me Some Love 11:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

It seems as though all mentions of awards and accomplishments were removed from the article over time... which I dont believe is appropriate. Using Plano Senior High School (an FA) as an example, you see that the awards for the various programs are stated. They shouldnt read as a laundry list, sure, but we can figure out a way to work it so that it doesnt sound like bragging. I dont see any reason why these acomplishments shouldn't be in the article. Other pages get to show off their shinies... and so should LB. <fonkl;/t/ color="Indigo">Queerbubbles | Leave me Some Love 13:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Basically, the problem isn't whether the information is present, it's how it is presented. For something a littler closer to home, look at the page for Westfield, which lists all the specific state sports championships that they've earned, with a year and sport for each. A vague statement like "the Orch/kg back a long way. Basically, this page should not read like the "About Us" section of a school's website - it should read like an encyclopedia article. I hope this clears some stuff up; if it doesn't, feel free to ask. FlamingSilmaril (talk) 14:11, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The alumni s,/n,./ection is a bit disorganized -- would it be useful to order them by date of graduation perhaps? Also, a few alumni have /?n.k;/been added without graduation years. This seems like sort of a basic element of an alumni description element? Scratchsamples (talk) 05:07, 9 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lake Braddock Secondary School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.springfieldconnection.com/article.asp?archive=true&article=20945&paper=72&cat=124
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080924164748/http://www.connectionnewspapers.com/article.asp?archive=true&article=82566&paper=61&cat=106 to http://www.connectionnewspapers.com/article.asp?archive=true&article=82566&paper=61&cat=106
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050530074152/http://www.fcps.k12.va.us/LakeBraddockSS/ to http://www.fcps.k12.va.us/LakeBraddockSS/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070310205220/http://members.cox.net/lakebraddockchorus/ to http://members.cox.net/lakebraddockchorus/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:22, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The football section sounds more like a newspaper than an encyclopedia. I am wondering whether this is meant to be how it is written or if it needs to be edited. BWludXM4 (talk) 11:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Is it possible to mention the very recent incident where a student had threatened to bring a gun to school? The principal, Mrs. Kearns, sent an email out to parents about the matter and that a fake gun was brought to school. To add to this, rumors said that a shooting was to happen on Friday (3/17/2023), however no shooting occurred. I can confirm this because I attend school there, however I would like to remain anonymous. Argh thedude! (talk) 19:16, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Argh thedude! - We aren't interested in rumours, unless they can be backed up by Reliable sources, published by Independent sources with a reputation for fact checking - Arjayay (talk) 19:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Would an email sent by the principal count as a reliable source? Argh thedude! (talk) 21:34, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Clearly not, Argh thedude!
1) it would not be published by a Reliable source, we need sources that readers can check up on in future years
2) that is not an Independent source - Furthermore, rumors are considered rather trivial - Arjayay (talk) 21:52, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2024 and 9 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Victoriaalfieri (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Victoriaalfieri (talk) 20:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply