NinjaRobotPirate

The Plants vs Zombies sock is back. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 19:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think everything is cleaned up for now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:11, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Isabelle Belato

 

• Ian.thomson
• Modussiccandi

  Interface administrator changes

  Izno

 

  CheckUser changes

  Barkeep49

  Technical news

• Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
• Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

  Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ

The IP vandal you range blocked for vandalizing film budgets, like Meatballs III, has returned and continues to do so. They are currently using 2405:201:8011:C02E:F4E2:310E:54DA:7CA9. NJZombie (talk) 06:19, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, he tends to come in waves of IP addresses. It might take a few more range blocks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Coming to you because of that ban in early April and I don't want to be slapped for edit warring. If you have a few minutes can you take a look a Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates: Revision history, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:53, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Do you remember when I reported this editor back in January and blocked them for six months? The editor is back yet again, making unexplained edits in articles [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 16:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Soft blocked for another six months. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:14, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Similar to the topic above, this IP sock is back in action, editing Barbie (film), Mission Impossible, and reverting on Alien: Romulus. ภץאคгöร 17:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for 3 months, which should help somewhat. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey, NinjaRobotPirate. There is currently a discussion at the Reliable sources Noticeboard with it having to do with the Carrie Keranen article that was recently edited by yourself. Figured you might want a heads up and to have a chance to participate in the discussion. Hope you have a good day, --Super Goku V (talk) 06:23, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ambili123

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2409:40F3:1094:A201:5F1:A577:18D:9819

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Al_Madeena_Cherpulassery

socks keep creating and attacking "madeena" page, it was already deleted, any help Cenderabird (talk) 17:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well, Al Madeena Cherpulassery was recreated by a sock after a deletion discussion, so I deleted it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sevens_Football

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bobanfasil

(same should be done with this copypaste of main article) Cenderabird (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ARoshanyadav7&redlink=1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Imsamrat392

i found exact same pattern of bad grammar across similar sports venue articles, highly possible another sock. Cenderabird (talk) 23:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't know anything about this. I also can't read mobile links on my PC. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sevens Football, please delete. in my recent log too. Cenderabird (talk) 16:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have no idea what you're talking about. If you want an article deleted, tag it. I don't understand your English. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Pppery

  Interface administrator changes

  Pppery

 

  Oversighter changes

  Wugapodes

  CheckUser changes

 

• Courcelles
• GeneralNotability

  Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.

  Arbitration

• Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
• Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
• The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.

  Miscellaneous

• Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
• A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!

Hello. I have a quick question on if I'm editing correctly. I've made edits on The Hitcher, The Hitcher II: I've Been Waiting, The Hitcher, and Mayfair Witches in regards to horror being a genre of those projects. I was wondering if I'm editing incorrectly, because a user had messaged me recently about the former three projects and just today, again, the same user left a message about the latter project. Before I reply to the new message on my talk page, I wanted to know if I'm making incorrect edits. I left multiple sources on The Hitcher page, but the edit was still reverted. I'll leave links to my edits below and my responses so far. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong and any advice would be helpful, because I don't want to upset anyone or make any more bad edits, as I was already told that I shouldn't add things that I think would be helpful to articles. I'm just confused, I suppose, and just want to know how to be better. Thank you for your time. Obi-WanKenobi-2005 (talk) 14:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

First discussion
Second discussion
The Hitcher (1986) history
The Hitcher II: I've Been Waiting (2003) history
The Hitcher (2007) history
Mayfair Witches history

Well, genres should be based on what sources say. I guess I prefer tertiary sources for genres because a review is just one person's opinion. But sourced is better than unsourced, and it doesn't really matter what random Wikipedians think the genre is; this would be original research. Unsourced material also should not be restored unless it has been properly sourced. Genre warriors can be warned with {{uw-genre1}} through {{uw-genre4}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

That's what I had thought as well. I added five sources, not reviews, in this edit and it was changed back and I was told here not to add things to articles that I think would be helpful. I just don't want to keep upsetting people by adding sources, because I want to be helpful. I was continuing to edit other articles as well after that, but I was told here today that I was causing problems and it just made me want to figure it out. Obi-WanKenobi-2005 (talk) 15:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) I didn't look at all the edits (or sources) in question, but just some general advice that strong sources to cite for genre include AFI, BFI, and AllMovie. The Hitcher, for example, is listed as "horror" at this entry. Usually I check all three sites to see if there is a consensus among them, then I roll with that. Worth noting that AllMovie isn't what it used to be (see this discussion), but AFI and BFI are definitely solid. --GoneIn60 (talk) 23:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have used AllMovie among other reliable sources and I'll keep that in mind. I appreciate the help from both of you. I want to edit the pages back, but I am worried about the same user calling me a problem again, or telling me to not edit the page again. I get hesitant to edit now out of fear of doing something wrong. Obi-WanKenobi-2005 (talk) 02:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Are other users allowed to keep removing talk page messages from my talk page? It's happened twice now by the user I mentioned above. Thank you for your time. Obi-WanKenobi-2005 (talk) 22:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

No, people aren't supposed to do that. I guess I should leave a message about that, too. I'll do that in a little while. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

That's what I thought. I appreciate your time. Obi-WanKenobi-2005 (talk) 22:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can I get some help here? User:Warthunder20, a clear sock of Agustin Sepulveda Venegas 2004 Fan is running around making a mess. The smoking guns are requesting Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Agustin_Sepulveda_Venegas_2004_Fan to be speedy deleted (12), recreating Sasquash, as three of Agustin's other socks have, interests of Stephen King's The Lawnmower Man, Bob the Builder, and what started it all, making a non-request at RFPP-D for the recently protected The Fat Controller (protected due to confirmed socking of Agustin's), while not addressing the reason the page was protected. Thanks. Zinnober9 (talk) 02:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think it's all cleaned up. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Looks great, thank you so much for the quick action! Zinnober9 (talk) 02:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Some potential TTF24 IP requests on WP:AFC/R (@Ponyo) -- – macaddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 22:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I did some range blocks, which may help. I don't understand why people keep creating redirects for this sock puppeteer. I guess I'll watchlist them and see if anyone comes around to edit them later. Maybe I can at least use them as honeypots. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:15, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail!-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:01, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 

• Asilvering
• Significa liberdade

 

• Good Olfactory
• Hesperian
• I JethroBT
• TommyBoy
• Woody

  CheckUser changes

 

• Barkeep49
• Izno

 

• Doug Weller
• Spicy

  Guideline and policy news

• Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
• Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.

  Arbitration

• The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
• An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
• Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).

  Miscellaneous

• If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.

Thoughts about this IP? Based upon the nature of and edit summary from their first edit last December, it's the same person on a static IP. They've occasionally been disruptive, but the past couple of weeks they've shown up more frequently, and been more disruptive, than previously. I wondered if a preventative block might be in order, given the apparently static nature of the address, but I know admins are generally very reluctant to block IPs for long. Grandpallama (talk) 18:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well, what exactly is the problem? Some of the edits seem to be removing unsourced content, such as Special:Diff/1242882557 and Special:Diff/1242883490, which remove unsourced claims of urban legends with the rationale that they're folklore, not urban legends. Are there more disruptive edits? To be honest, I have no intention of checking every edit. If it were 10 edits, sure. But not that many. You have to show me the disruptive ones because my random sample didn't find any. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm considering unblocking Keith McKenzie with strict restrictions. See UTRS appeal #94890. I'm the original blocking admin, you subsequently revoked talk page access. I've CU-verified there's been no recent block evasion. If you don't have access to UTRS, I'm happy to state the restrictions I'm proposing here. Let me know if you have questions or concerns. --Yamla (talk) 10:57, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ugh, that was someone who was logging out to perform Nazi-themed vandalism and then posted obvious lies about it? If you think someone like that can be helpful. I just don't think that we're so hard up for users that we need neo-Nazis. If someone volunteered at a food shelter and got caught scrawling swastikas, I don't really think they'd be welcome there any more. For whatever reason, a lot of people treat editing Wikipedia as if it's a basic human right, and it's some kind of cruel and unusual punishment to tell someone to go away. If the press found out that we had a revolving door for neo-Nazis, there'd probably be a big scandal. I look forward to the inevitable New York Daily News headline "Wikipedia secretly written by Neo-Nazis who can't stay banned!!" NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:03, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good point. I'll decline the request. --Yamla (talk) 17:00, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Graveland. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Please pay attention to used sources and their reliability. Controversies can be described in their own section, and should not be stated as fact in the main section, especially when poorly referenced.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sofdunno (talk) 11:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think the sockpuppet who edits in Indian civil services articles, such as All India Services, Central Civil Services, Civil Services of India etc has returned. There were additions in Union Public Service Commission in the last few months from random accounts and IPs. 2409:4073:4EC9:DA06:E8C6:838F:D3D1:30A7 (talk) 14:46, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

A couple sock puppets edit those articles if I remember correctly. It looks like latest puffery was added by Sk7xd. That account has extensive overlap with Vrghs jacob and his sock puppets, but I'm not 100% sure that's a sock puppet. It would be easier if everyone stayed on the same IP range, like during the COVID19 pandemic. I haven't looked at these articles in a little while, so it's hard to remember what all the disruption was about. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

 

I see that you continue to be harassed by the annoying IP. I hope this kitten makes you feel better.

NoobThreePointOh (talk) 00:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well, it's not really harassment. It's just some kid wasting his own time. Then again, I guess I'm used to being the internet's babysitter. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

See Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Gng1999. I blocked them and tagged them as suspected socks of HollywoodHero30. You retagged them as a separate case. Now we have Douglas1998A, whom I'm willing to block based on the following behavioral characteristics in no particular order: username similarity, creates cats of a certain type and populates them; and edits at a rapid clip atypical of a new user. I also noticed some differences: uses the visual editor and edits the page rather than the External link section. Gng1999, unless there is recent login data, is stale, but I thought I'd ask for your CU and non-CU thoughts before blocking. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

It looks like I was pretty confident of that tag, doesn't it? Douglas1998A is on the wrong continent, though. He has a previous account, Sirdougieparrella98, which hasn't edited in almost two years, but that was a while ago. Wrong continent for HollywoodHero30, too. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm not going to behaviorally block with those technical findings. Thanks very much for checking.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 

• Crisco 1492

 

• Babajobu
• Daniel
• Elf
• Jayron32
• Thue
• Wugapodes

  CheckUser changes

  Maxim

  Oversighter changes

  Maxim

  Guideline and policy news

• Following a discussion, the discussion-only period proposal that went for a trial to refine the requests for adminship (RfA) process has been discontinued.
• Following a request for comment, Administrator recall is adopted as a policy.

  Technical news

• Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

  Arbitration

• RoySmith, Barkeep49 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2024 Arbitration Committee Elections. ThadeusOfNazereth and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
• Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections.
• The Arbitration Committee is seeking volunteers for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.

  Miscellaneous

• An unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_FC_Dubai# 93.143.139.150 (talk) 18:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_Neiva#

another personal style isssue...several traces in his infobox club articles also need to be checked 93.143.139.150 (talk) 19:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have no idea what you're asking for. If you think something is wrong with the article, you can always fix it yourself or post on the talk page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

In the 2004 The Punisher movie, Marvel is listed as Marvel Enterprises, not Marvel Entertainment. Stein256 (talk) 23:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia article is citing this page at the AFI Catalog of Feature Films. It's written by film scholars, who probably know more than us about who produced what. Sometimes logos show up on the screen (or the poster), and sometimes they're production companies. Sometimes they aren't. That's why we cite reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:31, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply