Mhmrodrigues

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Duke of Masovia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rawa

Duke of Silesia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kingdom of Poland

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Indian monarchs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Indian monarchs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Pomeranian duchies and dukes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matilda of Brandenburg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 27 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of monarchs of Finland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• III Vasa|Sigismund]] (''Sigismund'') (titled) [[Grand Duke of Finland|Grand Prince of Finland]]) and [[John, Duke of Östergötland|John III]] (''Juhana III'')

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:04, 29 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of High Kings of Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kinkora. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 31 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your edits are being reverted because other editors disagree with them. Stop it and come to the talk page and discuss it. --Nicknack009 (talk) 21:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of High Kings of Ireland. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Not only is your Anglicization of the names of the kings against consensus, but you are very close to WP:3RR. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Counts of Toggenburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Feldkirch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the County of Sargans page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Ukrainian rulers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Ukrainian rulers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of Armenian kings page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

• • Problem fixed, thanks for the warning. Mhmrodrigues (talk) 19:33, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of rulers of Hesse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rotenburg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of rulers of Hesse, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rochefort and Waldeck. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Duchy of Brunswick-Lüneburg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nancy and Dannenberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Duchy of Brunswick-Lüneburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brunswick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rulers of Saxony, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sulzbach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rulers of Saxony, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stolberg and Bernstadt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited County of Nassau, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Königstein and Beilstein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited County of Nassau, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Orange-Nassau, Erbach and Schwarzburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 25 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Counts Palatine of the Rhine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burghausen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Electoral Palatinate into List of Counts Palatine of the Rhine. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:09, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Counts Palatine of the Rhine, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Landsberg and Maximilian I of Bavaria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rulers of Mecklenburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goldberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 23 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Werdenberg (Holy Roman Empire), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fürstenberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Duchy of Gascony, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 12 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited County of Dagsburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 14 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Principality of Nitra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lower Pannonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rulers of Provence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elvira of Castile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Indian monarchs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vishnugupta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Indian monarchs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalyani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Henneberg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Schwarza and Aschach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited County of Werdenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fürstenberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Counts of Montfort, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Feldkirch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Counts of Schauenburg and Holstein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stormarn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:15, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Schwarzburg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Homburg, Blankenburg and Wachsenburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:48, 22 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Triarchy of Negroponte, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Andrea Cornaro and Antonio Giustiniani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Duke of Ferrara and of Modena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rinaldo d'Este.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Family tree of the Malaspina family, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 00:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Family tree of the Malaspina family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family tree of the Malaspina family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 01:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malaspina family, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Varano and Castiglione.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Armenian monarchs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ishkhan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of monarchs of Georgia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Teimuraz II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Dos Pilas into Maya rulers. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 15:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Diannaa: Hi! Thank you for noting this, but how am I supposed to know who edited the part that I've copied? That would take me ages to search in the page's history. If I understood the rule right, then maybe the problem would be solved if I rewrote the text that I copied. It's probably better, right? Thank you for your advice! Greetings, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 17:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

You don't need to specify the individual editor. Linking to a list of all contributors is considered as adequate attribution. The list is available in the article history. Therefore an edit summary that says where it was copied from and to see that page's history is considered adequate attribution. Here is an example of how to do it.— Diannaa (talk) 18:26, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Diannaa: Thank you, but I've already changed the text. Thank you anyway. Greetings, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 18:49, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rulers of Württemberg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brunswick and Altes Schloss.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maya stelae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sacul.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Yaxchilan into Maya stelae. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:16, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Casper (Maya ruler), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tortuguero.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Principality of Lippe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Halle, Neudorf and Baruth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of counts of East Frisia

added links pointing to Blankenheim and Attena

Duchy of Brunswick-Lüneburg

added a link pointing to Bevern

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

County of Isenburg

added links pointing to Offenbach, Erbach and Fürstenberg

Principality of Lippe

added a link pointing to Baruth

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm InvadingInvader. I noticed that you recently removed content from Calakmul without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. InvadingInvader (talk) 21:29, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

@InvadingInvader: Hi! I just moved the content to the page Maya rulers (I redirected it on the main article link). There the list of Calakmul rulers is more complete, and you can access to the rulers of other Maya cities too. You just have to look for the city to see its rulers. It wasn't a mistake, and it's true, I should pay more attention to description of changes. Hope you understand the move! Greetings, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 22:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know; please do try to leave edit summaries though. They really help identify and distinguish reasonable moves or deletions away from vandalism. InvadingInvader (talk) 22:43, 2 August 2022 (UTC) InvadingInvader (talk) 22:43, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

When moving or copying content from one Wikipedia article to another, you are required by the terms of our license to state in your edit summary where you got the material. Please see WP:copying within Wikipedia for more information. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying/moving content within Wikipedia in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 15:16, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maya stelae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corozal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello- Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

• Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
  • The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
• Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 00:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please stop hopping to random Wikipedia articles and adding governors, viceroys, and/or regents everywhere you go. I do understand the significance, however your edits have taken up ridiculously large amounts of room. Please discuss with other users BEFORE making such drastic edits, but if you feel very strongly, at least use the plainlist tool to collapse your absurdly long lists of people ({{List collapsed|title=See list|). Unlimitedlead (talk) 01:17, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maya stelae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ojo de Agua.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eight Deer Jaguar Claw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cholula.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Adelasia of Torres

added a link pointing to Ardara

Barisone III of Torres

added a link pointing to Ardara

Gonario II of Torres

added a link pointing to Clairvaux

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Imperial County of Reuss

added links pointing to Asch, Schönberg, Waldenburg, Ebersdorf and Baruth

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Principality of Waldeck and Pyrmont, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dean.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why don't u use the sandbox? Gazozlu (talk) 13:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Gazozlu:! Sorry, I forgot that there was already a page named County of Leiningen and changed my mind. Mhmrodrigues (talk) 14:31, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

You can copy paste the existing article into your sandbox and edit it there without disruptions whenever u want and then paste it back into the main article in one big edit when you are mostly done. Might be handy for what you are trying to do. Gazozlu (talk) 14:34, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Gazozlu:! Thank you for the useful advice! Greetings, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. Gazozlu (talk) 19:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

County of Leiningen

added links pointing to Falkenstein, Palatinate, Worms, Fürstenau and Hohenfels

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited County of Oettingen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rohrbach and Orth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

If somebody wants to know who the count of Cerdanya was in any given year, they should be able to find that in the county of Cerdanya article. And in a simple list. Why would you force them to scroll through a colour-coded table that mixes everything up? It makes no sense. Srnec (talk) 20:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi! @Srnec: Sorry, you can revert. I just hope you're not saying that my table is useless, because I lost a great amount of time doing it right. I just think that, with the list in the Cerdanya page, it kind of makes the Catalan counties' synthesis table unnecessary. Hope you understand my point of view. Greetings, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 20:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

OK. Don't worry, I won't mess with the table. Srnec (talk) 22:27, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

We were editing Duke of Silesia at the same time. I abandoned my edit so as not to mess up your work. Please be aware that under the requirements of HTML5, the old markup bgcolor=xxx should be replaced with style="background:xxx"; in this markup the quotation marks and the pound sign (#) before hexadecimal colors are not optional. Also, the old markup align=xxx should be replaced with style="text-align:xxx"; in this markup the quotes are not optional. Also, when both alignment and color are listed, they have to be merged into one style, e.g. style="text-align:center; background:red" This happened only once in this particular article, but you may have removed that item. Anyway, I spent a long time fixing all of these items and had to abandon it, so I leave it to you now. Anomalocaris (talk) 00:20, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Anomalocaris:! Sorry! I forgot to put the edit notification above... Unfortunately I have always edited the way I do and I'm not well aware of these new rules. I'll abandon the page now. If you want, you can do the edition again. Note: if it is a long edition, I advise you to put this sign below, to avoid edit conflicts (as I should have done)

This user talk page or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this user talk page has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use. This page was last edited by Mhmrodrigues (talk | contribs) 16 seconds ago. (Update timer)

Greetings, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 00:27, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Just before I was going to save, I did a Show changes and from that I saw it had already been saved, and I didn't want to stomp on the changes you had already saved. Go ahead and do what you want to do. It would be great to use the HTML5-compliant markup, which the article already does to a significant extent anyway. I'll come back in a few days and clean up again if needed. —Anomalocaris (talk) 05:16, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Anomalocaris: Hi! Thank you for your understanding! If you insist, I'll check again. In fact I was thinking in adding more content. Don't worry, when I finish I'll tell you here. Greetings, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 17:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have already fixed the table cell alignment and color markup. It should not be difficult to follow the pattern. Kindly change markup like bgcolor=#aba to style="background:#aba". —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

House of Ascania

added a link pointing to Frederiksborg

Principality of Anhalt

added a link pointing to Frederiksborg

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mixtec, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chila and Tataltepec.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hohenlohe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fürstenau and Neuenstein.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hohenlohe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Altenberg and Kirchberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited County of Nassau, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Reichelsheim, Burbach and Johannetta of Sayn-Wittgenstein.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of rulers of Belarus, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of rulers of Belarus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited County of Nassau, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Beilstein, Diez and Herborn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of leaders of Ukraine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pereyaslavl.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of leaders of Ukraine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gorodets.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello Mhmrodrigues, I noticed that you added "Adalbert II the Devout" to the list of rulers of Austria (in this edit). He has no article, and I wasn't able to find any other information about him. Based on my information, I doubt he existed. Can you tell me where you found out about him, or where to find anything on him? Kornatice (talk) 02:58, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Kornatice:! Thank you for you question. Have you tried to access his Commons page I've created as well? There you'll see at the side the wikis which have information on him. You may need to translate (as I did). From there you can also go to his Wikidata page/element, that I give you here as well. You can also search for him in the Medieval Lands site, which has citations for documentation. Adalbert the Devout is an elder son of Leopold III, which died a year after his father (in 1137), and that's why I think he might have been overlooked in traditional lists. I saw that some sources say that he has been excluded from succession but they don't present justifications for that. What if such exclusion was invented by later sources to justify the traditional succession from Leopold III to Leopold IV? I don't know as well. If he is confirmed as margrave, he would be one of the shortest reigns in Austria. If you have any more questions please let me know! Have a nice weekend! Greetings, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 12:24, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prince of Polotsk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Salm (state), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ravenstein, Palatinate and House of Holland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Salm (state)

added links pointing to Wiener, Erbach, Anholt and Nancy

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Gonzaga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revere.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aleramici, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Incisa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Schwarzburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frankenhausen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Principality of Fürstenberg

added links pointing to Wartenberg, Trimberg, Baar and Haslach

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited County of Isenburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Offenbach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

County of Isenburg

added a link pointing to Herschbach

County of Leiningen

added a link pointing to Worms

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Imperial County of Reuss, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lobenstein, Karlsbad and Andělská Hora.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Counts of Schauenburg and Holstein

added links pointing to Borken and Brühl

List of Pomeranian duchies and dukes

added a link pointing to Barth

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Principality of Waldeck and Pyrmont, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waldeck.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Ascania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coswig.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Ascania, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Oldenburg and Pless.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rulers of Mecklenburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bukow.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Mhmrodrigues. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:House of Arnstein, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Henneberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henneberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Henneberg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stolberg, Osterburg and Schwarza.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Lippe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deutz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Malaspina family. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Unexplained re-insertion of such content is disruptive. Drmies (talk) 15:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, @Ohnoitsjamie: @Drmies:! I would like to know the reasons why my edits are disruptive. In the Hohenlohe page, my point is to add a list of the rulers of the place. Is it because it needs more sources? The table is too confusing? There are too many colours? I wouldn't want to trash out my work, but I would want to repurpose it. How can I do it, if I am not aware of what is wrong, specifically, with my work? Thank you in advance! Greetings, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 19:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

All of the above. Foremost, Wikipedia requires reliable sources for all material; nothing in that table seems to be supported by any citations. Additionally, our manual of style, specifically sections on MOS:COLOR, dictate that color should not be "the only method used to communicate important information." It's not clear at all what purpose the wide variety of colors in that table serve. Wikipedia is not free webhosting for geneaology. Wikipedia is not free webhosting for genealogy pursuits. There are plenty of other places on the Internet for building your own geneaology pages, but Wikipedia is not one of them. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, @Ohnoitsjamie:! Thank you for your response and kindness.

a) I understand that I insert few sources, and I'll try to correct that. However, I do not know a lot of sources, and I recognise that. I also hope that, as a collaborative site as Wikipedia is, other fellow Wikipedians will fill holes on other sources I don't have access.

b) As I already told to @Drmies:, the tables I insert are not genealogies. Are you saying that because of the fact that I insert "Son of x and y"? That's just a way to establish the relationship of the ruler with a previous one (Note that List of English monarchs have the exact same info on the monarchs in its tables I have on mine). It's widely known that estate management is familial. In Germany the estates were usually divided by various sons, situation that created different branches. That's what the colours are for; to distinguish branches. In my (humble) opinion, it's also interesting, for example, to see who are the mother and wife of the ruler, to have an immediate idea to which other neighbouring lands was the ruler connected to, by blood and marriage. That's probably why you see the table as a genealogy but note that usually a genealogy present all the children of a couple, and that's not what happens here: the tables present only the children that actually had some fraction of the land, because the focus in on the land (s) ruled by a family. The idea of the table is to present the rulers, ordered chronologically by date of accession, in succession on the different parts of the land. In the first table I usually present an idea of how the estates were partitioned and how they evolved in time; the second one is for the rulers of each of these parts.

c) I do not use just colour to differentiate; note that some minor divisions of the territory don't have a different colour; I insert the specific part under the column Ruling part. For example, in the Hohenlohe case, Wernsberg and Schelkingen were minor divisions under the Uffenheim part of Hohenlohe, and they had not different colours in the table.

d) In the Malaspina case, I recognise that this method backfired, because the number of rulers is very high, but let's not compare it with the Hohenlohe family, who are certainly more simple and, I believe, better sourced; I was thinking that in the Malaspina page, the table could be broken in smaller family lines, given the abnormally high number of branches. Maybe this could help to a better understanding of the different branches?

Given all of this, would you think that the lack of citations is actually my main problem? Beside adding sources, what advice can you give me on what to add/take from "my" tables? Would you advise, for example, relying more on the info in the "Ruling part" and less on colour, I mean, use one colour to a broader group of branches, to use less colours?

I don't know if you just want to get rid of these tables, but please understand my point of view: even if it is not conveniently sourced, the tables I made took a lot of effort, and seeing them in the pages is, for me as it would be for any other editor, proof that my work is valid and valuable for the community. So, I would like to improve the tables, and make them worthy of the pages they are in.

Sorry for the long text, and hope to get feedback from you. Thank you in advance for your understanding! Greetings, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 00:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I can't speak for User:Ohnoitsjamie, obviously, though I agree with their earlier comments. This kind of information needs rigorous sourcing, but even then the question is whether there is encyclopedic relevance here, or whether we're listing nobles just because they were nobles. As I said earlier, you can say these are tables and not genealogies, but a genealogy listing only the direct heirs or whatever is still a genealogy. Some of these people may be notable in their own right, but many are not. Listing names is one thing, but these huge (and they are huge) colored tables are, IMO, just completely undue. And in the one article there were the logos, with or without blossoms, and then you go on to say that wives and mothers are important too and should be included, and we need notes on the land holdings and whatnot, and before you know it there's 265,170 bytes of material, much of which is in there twice, since after the removal there are still dozens and dozens and dozens of names, many of which redlinked, and many of them also listed in various genealogies and other sectioned-off lists of names. And with COLOR I'm also pointing at the many colors that are not likely to be visible to those with vision impairments, besides the problems that OhnoitsJamie noted, and that's before we try to figure out how this words on a mobile device.

I think you may have to live with the fact that this level of detail (presented in this way) just isn't what we do here, and I'm actually tempted to also prune all the genealogical material (and lists) that follow the Dante paragraph, since so much of that material is also unverified and of questionable relevance. Why would these individuals be important to list? Drmies (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, @Drmies:, thank you for your response!

• If the concept of genealogy is, as you say "a list of direct heirs of whatever", I will assume that you consider any list of rulers (kings of Sweden, tsars of Russia), as a genealogy, which I honestly disagree.
• Your problems that you continue to list seem to stem from my edits at Malaspina family (excessive use of color, use of the coat of arms in the table, excessively long tables). I recognise that I was already advised to not use such strong colours, which I'm trying to improve in later years (in Malaspina family I couldn't, sorry, and you were in the right, there). I think you'll agree that in the Hohenlohe table the colours weren't that strong, right? It's because I'm making an effort to lighten the colours of tables, to, as you say, improve visibility.
• I understand that we don't agree in how I present the information in "my" tables, but I don't understand how the Hohenlohe table is related to the Malaspina one; they are two different tables. The Hohenlohe didn't have all of those problems you listed. If you ask me, it was a considerably shorter table, with fewer names, with not so many colours. If you consider that the main problem in the Hohenlohe page is, then, the lack of sources, I come to ask you to restore the table there and I'll see which sources I can insert in the table. If not, please explain the problem with the Hohenlohe table.
• Also, I've noticed you deleted the table in Hohenlohe, but didn't present any alternative solution to present a list of the rulers there. If you don't agree with the restoration of the Hohenlohe table, nor think the sources are enough to make this table better, I would suggest we work together to find a solution that pleases both of us. You already know what and how I think, but I'm open to your suggestions: how can we preserve the maximum quantity of information, without losing quality, in your point of view? Thank you in advance for your kindness and understanding! Greetings, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 13:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply