Talk:Mississippi Highway 9W/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by MathewTownsend in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 18:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- will review. MathewTownsend (talk) 18:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- review
- "The route runs 20.087 mi (32.327 km) from MS 9 north of Bruce, Calhoun County north to MS 7 south of Oxford, Lafayette County." - this is hard to read. Are some commas or semicolons needed?
- "designated onto its current alignment in 1956" - is that the way it's said? or should it be just "to its current alignment"? or some other wording?
- Reworded. Dough4872 00:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
- I've made one edit which you are free to revert.[1]
- on hold for now. MathewTownsend (talk) 18:58, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough4872 00:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
- reply
- "Mississippi Highway 9W (MS 9W) is a state highway located in northern Mississippi. The route runs 20.087 mi (32.327 km) from MS 9 north of Bruce in Calhoun County and heads north to MS 7 south of Oxford in Lafayette County."
- Do you mean MS 9 starts north of Bruce in Calhoun County and then heads north to MS 7 which is south of Oxford in Lafayette County?
- Do you mean that MS 7 is south of Oxford in Lafayette County? Or do you man that MS 7 heads north to MS 7, then south of Oxford in Lafayette?
- Sorry for being confusing. MathewTownsend (talk) 13:36, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
- Reworded to clearly indicate where southern and northern termini are. Dough4872 16:38, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry for being confusing. MathewTownsend (talk) 13:36, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
- ok, it's clearer. MathewTownsend (talk) 17:44, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
- b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
- c. no original research:
- a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
- fair representation without bias:
- fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- no edit wars, etc:
- no edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass
- Pass or Fail:
Thanks for clarifying! MathewTownsend (talk) 17:47, 16 July 2012 (UTC)