Talk:Mississippi Highway 9W/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 18:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• will review. MathewTownsend (talk) 18:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

review

• "The route runs 20.087 mi (32.327 km) from MS 9 north of Bruce, Calhoun County north to MS 7 south of Oxford, Lafayette County." - this is hard to read. Are some commas or semicolons needed?

• Fixed. Dough4872 00:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• "designated onto its current alignment in 1956" - is that the way it's said? or should it be just "to its current alignment"? or some other wording?

• Reworded. Dough4872 00:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I've made one edit which you are free to revert.[1]
• on hold for now. MathewTownsend (talk) 18:58, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough4872 00:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

reply

• "Mississippi Highway 9W (MS 9W) is a state highway located in northern Mississippi. The route runs 20.087 mi (32.327 km) from MS 9 north of Bruce in Calhoun County and heads north to MS 7 south of Oxford in Lafayette County."

• Do you mean MS 9 starts north of Bruce in Calhoun County and then heads north to MS 7 which is south of Oxford in Lafayette County?
• Do you mean that MS 7 is south of Oxford in Lafayette County? Or do you man that MS 7 heads north to MS 7, then south of Oxford in Lafayette?

Sorry for being confusing. MathewTownsend (talk) 13:36, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reworded to clearly indicate where southern and northern termini are. Dough4872 16:38, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• ok, it's clearer. MathewTownsend (talk) 17:44, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:

   b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:

   b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:

   c. no original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.

   fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   no edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Pass

Thanks for clarifying! MathewTownsend (talk) 17:47, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]