User talk:Thebestofall007

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Thebestofall007. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Electriccatfish2 (talk) 23:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had to buy you a beer for that photo on your user page! It made my day. Even though I am an old Army guy, I raise my glass! Hooah! Traveler7 (talk) 04:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Thebestofall007 (talk) 05:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sam Oropeza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Oropeza until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --IShadowed 03:37, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Good job with AmeriCleaningGreen.com and the AIV report. I should probably also point out to you that you don't need to tell someone that you are reporting them to AIV. You must notify them, however, by SPI, ANI, and UAA reports. Thank You! Electriccatfish2 (talk) 23:49, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Refractor card, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chrome (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for reporting this editor to the Administrator intervention against vandalism noticeboard.

I declined to block him for now. His contributions to date have been junk but we normally give new editors a bit more in the way of warnings and guidance before we block them. He'd gotten some templates about article deletions but only one true warning, after which he's added nothing more. I'm not sure he had evil intentions -- maybe just a misunderstanding of what we accept and what we don't accept. I left him a note explaining this a bit more.

Thanks for flagging this problem. Hopefully we can bring him along and get him to make more useful contributions. Time will tell as to his motivations here.
--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:37, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir/Madam:

I very much appreciate your diligence in protecting the Wikipedia community from copyright violations, vandalism, and other licentious acts. It is comforting to know that individuals like yourself seek to promote the highest standards of integrity and morality. As a relatively new member to our community, I would respectfully request your assistance in helping me to publish this article on Eric Schlager in a format that would be acceptable to you and in accordance with Wikipedia's legally enforceable doctrines. I would very much appreciate you sending me the information for the deleted page so that I may revise such data to be in accordance with stated policy and procedure.

To address some of your stated concerns: (i) Nearly all of the published article was fact-based and included no opinions. While you note that certain material was cited to the Urban Land Institute website, in fact, if you closely analyze the citations, you will see that most of this information was previously published as generally available biographical data on the Bulfinch Companies website. (ii) Mr. Eric Schlager meets the generally accepted qualifications of being a notable entity as a result of the size of his company, civic leadership positions, mentions in national publications, etc...

I am willing to work with you to ensure the completeness and professionalism of this encyclopedic entry. In the future, I will run all pages by you before publication so that we may be able to avoid any unnecessary hindrances to future publication.

Thank you very much for your assistance.

Very Kind Regards.

Response to previous Conflict of Interest Post dated Aug. 3 on my Talk: You allege a conflict of interest. The person writing this page is neither Eric Schlager, a family member, friend, etc. This is an arms-length party writing an encyclopedic article about Eric Schlager. Please restore this page. Thank you for your concerns, but they are unfounded and not based in valid evidence — Preceding unsigned comment added by EDS250 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

EWikist^Talk 02:43, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hi I have seen that you have tagged on "Insysd" Insysd is important because it is new generation entrepreneur company , normally all the company article display in wiki is are big and renowned companies, but no one is knowing that how the company suffer in the early stage of the company. as Insysd slowly making it self as a brand and a name but how this company moving form it's initial stage to second stage is very important. I have observed how this company struggled and trying hard to from the very beginning though this company having bunch of intelligent employees. so it is always good to see how a small company is growing and spreading in the market. IT's Strategic domain high performance consulting services is growing very fast and the brand is start holding its own space in this domain. So people are interested to know how this segment working and its style of work. Their success and failure. so i feel tag on Insysd should be removed. and allow to keep this article in wiki. thanks. I would love to get your valuable suggestions as I am new writer in wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debasishsinha (talk • contribs) 05:37, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help and guidance. New user..go figure. Hey, can you tell me how notoriety is measured at wikipedia? Patrick Miller Booth (talk) 03:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just wanted to say that I appreciate the welcome.

I also appreciate the fact that when I made a page that wasn't worthy of Wikipedia you requested speedy deletion. I've gotta get better as a user and writer on Wikipedia, so a two-word article was a bad idea.

Once again, thanks. Is there a way I can vote for you to be an administrator?

Kievaughn (talk) 19:41, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. When I place an entry in request for adminship you can vote for me there. Thebestofall007 (talk) 20:45, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the current/template. I was looking for instructions on how to put one up as I had never done a current event before other than 'deaths'. Much appreciated. Thanks. Koplimek (talk) 16:27, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. Thebestofall007 (talk) 16:30, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Hi and thank you for your comments at my editor review. I saw that I welcomed you and I'm quite shocked that you're new here considering your vast knowledge of our policies. Your NPP and UAA work is beyond amazing and I'm very proud of you! Keep up the stupendous work! Electric Catfish 00:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

i noticed you edited a Mixed Martial Arts page in August, but you haven't listed yourself as a Participant on the Wikiproject for Mixed Martial Arts pages. I've decided to try to drum up interest to get more people involved!

Kevlar (talk) 01:26, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I saw you PRODed Gwapo, but I googled it and found nothing even remotely close to this term, so I've tagged it as a hoax. Feel free to revert me, though. Best, Electric Catfish 00:40, 16 September 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Hey Thebestofall007. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:56, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A good wikipedian! I like messing around and seeing how long it take to be fixed!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakoplant (talk • contribs) 23:59, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply] 

I've already corrected about 100+ edits that were nothing but back to back vandalism already in a space of about 30 minutes. I'm not blaming you though. Thebestofall007 (talk) 00:07, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KazLabz (talk) Respond on my TALKPAGE! I'm not an ADMINISTRATOR! 01:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Bronze STiki Barnstar of Merit
		Congratulations, Thebestofall007! You're receiving this barnstar of merit because you recently crossed the 5,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (talk) 15:31, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Thebestofall, I declined your recent report to AIV, the one about the Hurricane sassy people. The guy you had reported had only made one edit, and hadn't been warned at all, so it's not really fair to block him. No worries, though! The page has been deleted and create-protected, so their shenanigans are stopped for that page at least. In the future, it might be better to report this kind of thing at Requests for page protection instead. For times like this when it's a bunch of people hitting only one page, it can be better to semi-protect the page so that they can't keep vandalizing it, rather than trying to go through and report/block each one. Anyways, thanks! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 04:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I dealt with a similar situation like this earlier where about 30 ips and 2-3 accounts created a nonsense article that was aimed at attacking an entity. I reported to checkuser/spi the main offenders and the result was where all who participated in the fiasco got blocked. here is the archive. Anyway, thank you for pointers on how to deal with these situations. I do at times get overwhelmed when a lot of ip's gang up and I see where you are going here. Thebestofall007 (talk) 05:28, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir, Hi from N.Srinivasan in India Srirangam99. First of all a beer from me to you because I thought it was very lonely for me, a relative newbie in Wikipedia. I am not at all perfect, I'm in fact quite clumsy, but I don't lose heart because with the books and material I have for adding to articles, I have been very honest and nothing else.

First of all, thank you for intervening in the Veera Ballala II article and stopping vandalism in that article. There is another problem. By the way that user has also created trouble in the Satyasraya article.

In the Karnataka article, I was startled (you too will find this in case you are familiar with the history of India and its various provinces) to find that since its initial stages, some prejudiced minds did not even consider inclusion of what I call 'irrefutable historical facts' those attested by historians about occupation of territories and areas in the central, southern and south eastern parts of what is the Indian state of (modern) Karnataka by the Cholas from the Tamil country. It is this fact that south and south eastern Karnataka was controlled by Cholas for around 200 years almostcontinuously, which I sought to include but user Pied hornbill has been reverting my contributions without any discussion. You can see his talk page as well as the Karnataka talk page where I have appealed to him not to revert contributions without discussion. Prior to that on the talk pages of the article and the user I have also quoted extracts from books supporting my contention, but the same are being ignored. Can you kindly help out?? Srirangam99 (talk) 16:19, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, thanks for the timely intervention. Initially I thought the user Pied hornbill was an admin and as you might have seen in the talk page of Karnataka I posted excerpts from a book having an ISBN in support of my additions to the article. The same were reported more than once by this user and my repeated messages to him for having a discussion rather than deleting my additions without a discussion proved futile.

BTW, three dynasties in South India as originated from the state of Tamil Nadu (for your info) have a very old history. Of these, the Chola Dynasty and the Pandyas have a history going back to the BC era. The Pandyas about whom limited material is available are supposed to be oldest dynasty with their history being pegged back to 500 BC. Both Cholas and the Pandyas find mention in the rock edicts of the great conqueror and later peaceful monarch Ashoka as independent kingdoms outside the boundaries of his vast kingdom. Without elaborating, let me conclude that you will find these portions of history very interesting, should you decide to dig into those pages. I hope now both Pied hornbill and the anonymous user 69.112.23.166 will cease their activities. Many thanks once again. Srirangam99 (talk) 04:09, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sir, there is once again vandalism by user 69.112.23.166 in the Satyasraya article. He is reverting my edits without any discussion. This is for your information. Srirangam99 (talk) 14:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir, earlier there was vandalism in two articles viz. Veera Ballala II and Satyasraya which was set right because a user with just an I.P. address was interfering. Side by side as I pointed out to you earlier also, Karnataka was another article in which a user by the name Pied Hornbill was constantly reverting my edits. This article was semi-protected for a month. Now after the semi-protection date got over, the same user has again reverted my edits based on not one but two books. Can you pls. help?? Thanks in advance.Srirangam99 (talk) 10:47, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is a place you can report users who edit war called WP:ANEW, where you can report Pied Hornbill. I tried reporting Pied Hornbill at WP:AIV and the administrators referred me to WP:ANEW. You might try reporting Pied there. Also, if you suspect user:Pied Hornbill to be a sockpuppet of 69.112.23.166 (which would be possible if Pied was editing while logged out), you can report it to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations. Thebestofall007 (talk) 00:52, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, National Buildings Construction Corporation Limited, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.govjobboard.com/government-jobs/recruitment-of-additional-general-manager-junior-engineer-in-national-building-construction-corporation-limited-3/. As a copyright violation, National Buildings Construction Corporation Limited appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. National Buildings Construction Corporation Limited has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:National Buildings Construction Corporation Limited and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:National Buildings Construction Corporation Limited with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:National Buildings Construction Corporation Limited.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Singh.amandeep.nbcc (talk) 11:12, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This content should not be deleted as this content belongs to NBCC Ltd. http://nbccindia.gov.in/nbccindia/public/jsp_pub/thecompany.jsp. and we hold the copyrights to all this information--Singh.amandeep.nbcc (talk) 11:12, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday we had a row. One day after, I want to say this.

I was verbally rough, which was useful nor correct. Had I kept silent, it would be good all the same. The explanation for my writings I can mention is, that the speed of the actions (bot actions, speedy tag) caused unrest over here, right while I was cleaning things up. Actually I was writing an edit while the tag was placed (causing edit conflict). I can say that my edits were sincere, but that timings caused a problem.

I want to conclude that to me you are a serious editor and admin. Our row was a spike only. -DePiep (talk) 22:26, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. And no, no beer. Just remember the word "serious" I wrote. I could & shuld have added "sincere". -DePiep (talk) 23:26, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My deepest apologies, I accidentally blocked you and immediately reversed myself! I'm so sorry about that! Dreadstar ☥ 03:58, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, I didn't even know I was blocked. That's ok, we all make mistakes, including myself.

Just curious, what were you trying to do? Maybe I can learn a little something here so I can become an administrator someday. Thebestofall007 (talk) 04:03, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Argh, I was trying to block and clean up the vandalism from the user you reported, User talk:Waybuloo, and I accidentally (for the first time ever...well, except for the time I accidentally blocked myself!) blocked you instead....! Good luck in becoming an admin, if you ever need advice, I'll be happy to share what I know...especially about accidental blockages... :) Thanks for taking it in good spirit, call it a badge of honor... and let me know if you ever need assistance with anything! Dreadstar ☥ 04:09, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Purple Barnstar
		I hereby award you this Purple Heart Barnstar for wounds suffered from friendly fire during Anti-Vandalism patrol! Dreadstar ☥ 04:12, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Pilot's name as spoken by characters on the show is 47Niner. My edits are not incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.57.144 (talk) 01:16, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see I'd already warned him? Did he recreate the page or something? Hell In A Bucket (talk) 06:46, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• No, I didn't see it. I removed the warning. Thebestofall007 (talk) 07:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh Ok just was curious done that a few times myself. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 07:13, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DAS GEDICHT, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages German and Luxemburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Sin City Deciples, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, MrX

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sidney Wolinsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page House of Cards (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You updated the speedy deletion tag on 5 paragraph essay, changing the reason to: "Wikipedia is not a place for publication of original thought. As per WP:NOTESSAY". Please remember that the criteria for speedy deletion are fairly narrowly defined, and this rationale is not one of them. It is a reason to propose deletion, but no for speedy deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:54, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked that user indef for their clearly disruptive, non-BLP compliant edits (most of which I have had to oversight as well). However, ironically enough, the name of the account itself wasn't a problem ... I didn't find any mention of such a concern in the edits. Daniel Case (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Lgcsmasamiya. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Article on jessie, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 02:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice your 2 January 2014, request for speedy deletion of the Josh Earl article that I created. I'm not sure of the procedure as I have never had anything like this happen to me. I thought I should let you know that I have made significant changes to the article and added more independent supporting references. I did also provide comments via the 'contest deletion' button. I hope it is now OK and would appreciate your advice/consideration. Cheers.Melbourne3163 (talk) 00:33, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	A Tesla Roadster for you!
	Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 00:55, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I love editing wikipedia. Thebestofall007 (talk) 18:22, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:LJN. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Scarlettail (talk) 16:40, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LJN&diff=605317725&oldid=604928714. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Ocaasi ^{t | c} 16:43, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So sorry about that! It won't happen again! This account normally doesn't vandalise, but other people in my household share my laptop, and I didn't log out when they did this. Take this as a "little brother or sister" defense if you must, but this is now the last time anyone but me uses it, that's for sure! Please forgive me for this. Thebestofall007 (talk) 16:46, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thebestofall007. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nattyq1180/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Obviously a test page, it's a sandbox. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 07:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please ignore me, it's late and I'm a tired amphibian who didn't realize that it was indeed a G2 given it was in mainspace. Carry on §FreeRangeFrog^croak 07:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thebestofall007, I have proposed for deletion the article Infinity Blade 3 glitches and suggestions, before noticing that you already did it a few hours ago. I'm sorry for the mistake. Please, excuse me if this causes any confusion or trouble. LowLevel73^(talk) 17:24, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--That's OK. Thebestofall007 (talk) 00:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. Please be sure to do the required checks before tagging articles. This will ensure that the right kind of deletetion and deletion critera are being applied. See currently Non plagiaristic which you recently PRODed. For more information please see WP:NPP and WP:DELETION. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:13, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm OccultZone. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Andorivaban, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blood mama. Since you had some involvement with the Blood mama redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 19:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC) Not surprised. Just created it as a gag to show my wife. Understandable that it's not significant. Ericrost (talk) 00:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With this ever dramatic world and WikiDrama, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 06:01, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Haji Chak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjab Province. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of games notable for negative reception. Since you had some involvement with the List of games notable for negative reception redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thebestofall007,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]