User talk:ST47/Archive26

My Talk Page

My Contributions

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ST47.

Typo found. "an company" -> "a company". --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:35, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You added this website to the local spam blacklist for "blogspam". However, looking at their website (which I found while looking for sources for an article), it does not seem spammy or malicious. Can you explain? wizzito | say hello! 18:05, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wizzito: It is a blog, it was spammed by a user claiming to be the blog's owner to many pages. It was blacklisted to prevent this behavior from continuing using sockpuppets. ST47 (talk) 20:48, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing they've found another proxy. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Please can you unblock this user Choco Skit? We are undergoing a tutorial under the Igbo Wikimedians User Group and he was blocked while trying to log into the dashboard. Thank you Olugold (talk) 10:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just a courtesy note that I've unblocked 38.17.44.0/22 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) as it appears to have been reallocated to a residential ISP -- TNT (talk • she/her) 00:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).

Guideline and policy news

• A RfC is open to change the wording of revision deletion criterion 1 to remove the sentence relating to non-infringing contributions.
• A RfC is open to discuss prohibiting draftification of articles over 90 days old.

Technical news

• The deployment of the reply tool as an opt-out feature, as announced in last month's newsletter, has been delayed to 7 March. Feedback and comments are being welcomed at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project. (T296645)
• Special:Nuke will now allow the selection of standard deletion reasons to be used when mass-deleting pages. This was a Community Wishlist Survey request from 2022. (T25020)
• The ability to undelete the talk page when undeleting a page using Special:Undelete or the API will be added soon. This change was requested in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey. (T295389)

Arbitration

• Several unused discretionary sanctions and article probation remedies have been rescinded. This follows the community feedback from the 2021 Discretionary Sanctions review.

Miscellaneous

• The 2022 appointees for the Ombuds commission are Érico, Faendalimas, Galahad, Infinite0694, Mykola7, Olugold, Udehb and Zabe as regular members and Ameisenigel and JJMC89 as advisory members.
• Following the 2022 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AntiCompositeNumber, BRPever, Hasley, TheresNoTime, and Vermont.
• The 2022 Community Wishlist Survey results have been published alongside the ranking of prioritized proposals.

---

Hi! I learnt that I have to approach you for the recreation of the blp article of Bhumika Gurung. Her article was deleted with the stated reason of lack of notability WP:N which is not correct as the actress has done several lead roles. She was the lead with titular role in Nimki Mukhiya & Nimki Vidhayak and also negative lead Mann Kee Awaaz Pratigya 2. Apart from these lead roles she has also done prominent roles in films. She is verified across all social media platforms as a notable actress. So, I request the article be restored to draft space so that I can make suitable edits to it, to make it suitable for mainspace. Can you please help me with it because you were the administrator who WP:SALTed the page?Commonedits (talk) 07:03, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Commonedits: There is no deleted history at [1]. If you want to use an existing revision as the basis for a draft, you can follow WP:RUU and provide a link to the revision in your edit summary, and then continue working within draft space. ST47 (talk) 16:39, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ST47: Ok thank you. Can you explain how exactly I should go about to provide a link in the edit summary? Commonedits (talk) 05:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You blocked this user a while back as a sock of Bodiadub. Since that user has been globally blocked, I declined Alex's unblock request on the grounds that it is not for us patrolling admins to lift the blocks of globally blocked sockmasters, and it was apparently based on checkuser data anyway.

He has emailed me and insisted he has nothing to do with Bodiadub, that he is willing to provide proof of his real identity as a Miami-area journalists. I don't see anything in their edit histories that overlap. Is there something I can't see that shows up in the checkuser data? Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: His appeal is currently with ArbCom. It appears to be a case of account sharing with a globally banned user. ST47 (talk) 15:42, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to let you know that 192.80.184.0/22 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) and 192.80.188.0/23 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) no longer belong to a webhost... it's part of the range 192.80.184.0/21 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) which is registered to "COASTAL TELCO SERVICES", which is a home ISP in Maine. wizzito | say hello! 23:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly it was handed over to Coastal Telco just 2 days after you made your latest 3yr block... weird. wizzito | say hello! 23:39, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wizzito: Thanks for the info, I've unblocked them. How do you know the date it was transferred? Are you basing that on the update date in whois? ST47 (talk) 00:43, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah wizzito | say hello! 03:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. 45.83.4.0/22 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) belongs to Freedom Internet now, same rationale as the unblock of 45.80.168.0/22 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)). wizzito | say hello! 05:45, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Editnotice SCW CR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, would it be possible to make the block for 82.221.0.0/16 more specific?

Colocation hosting is isolated to AS50613 or 82.221.96.0/19 and 82.221.128.0/19.

UTRS appeal #53149

Gunnar Guðvarðarson (My Talk Page) 16:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC is open proposing a change to the minimum activity requirements for administrators.

Technical news

• Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the deletelogentry and deletedhistory rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928)
• When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)

Arbitration

• Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures § Opening of proceedings has been updated to reflect current practice following a motion.
• A arbitration case regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing has been closed.
• A arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been opened.

Miscellaneous

• Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines has closed, and the results were that 56.98% of voters supported the guidelines. The results of this vote mean the Wikimedia Foundation Board will now review the guidelines.

---

My IP address is 105.112.208.185. I've never connected to a VPN. Currently I'm working on some series of articles on the Igbo Wikipedia, Wikimedia Incubator and WikiData. I've received frequent IP Address Block from Tks4Fish and I humbly solicit for these frequent blocks to be stopped completely. Thank you. Timzy D'Great (talk) 08:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

208.87.232.0/21 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is at a branch of Brooklyn Public Library. May you please unblock it? Trillfendi (talk) 17:27, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It belongs to SurfControl, which is a webhost. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...which is apparently used by a branch of a library (seems likely, no?). Trillfendi: if you or anyone you know is affected by this block, feel free to request block exemption (and you can ask me directly, email or talk page). -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I commented in an archived discussion about an IP block, could you please have a look? Thanks. Adam Harangozó (NIHR WiR) (talk) 08:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Harangozó (NIHR WiR): Not sure how best to resolve this. It sounds like it is correctly blocking IP space used by a datacenter type of provider, but that provider is offering a VPN service that you (and others) use?

WP:ACC is always a solid way to request that an account be created for you, if you know of anyone who does not have the ability to access Wikipedia using their normal residential ISP's connection. ST47 (talk) 02:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG and C.Fred: This morning I read a slew of hilarious articles about a Florida activist who is asking that wonderful state to ban copies of the Bible from its schools, per the precedent it has otherwise been setting with math books et al. They say he has also done similar things in the past. So I decided to write a Wikipedia article about him, only to find from looking at the Chaz Stevens red link that we apparently had one before, that was deleted, not once, but twice, once speedy, once AFD. Or I guess it could have been a completely separate Chaz Stevens? Would one of you three kind gentlemen administrators - two of whom deleted it, and one of whom nominated it for deletion - be so good as to restore the two versions we had to my userspace, so I can see if they were actually about that persona, and if they had anything worth keeping? They might not, of course, since the AFD said the last one was very promotional, in which case I would write one de novo but at least I could use them for inspiration, see if they mentioned incidents or had references I might otherwise miss, etc. I have successfully done the same sorts of things before, both rescuing articles after deletion - Miss and Mister Supranational; Summer Rayne Oakes; Tina Machado - and political humor Cthulhu for President. Thank you kindly. --GRuban (talk) 13:05, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GRuban: It's a plausible enough subject that I've restored to Draft:Chaz Stevens. —C.Fred (talk) 17:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! That thing is huge! Jesus Christ! (Or, rather, given the subject ... Beelzeebub!) It's got 75 freaking references, most from highly reliable sources! How the ... (see previous) ... did it get deleted and not cleaned up?!? Honestly, I was expecting something three paragraphs long with only the guy's own blog as sources. I'm afraid now, because just from a casual look, I'd be perfectly fine producing something half that length, and would expect it to pass AFD with flying colors. I mean, I guess I will add the recent mentions, and clean up some of the promotional language, but that will be far less than what is already there. It seems to have been judged by a far too strict standard. --GRuban (talk) 17:37, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see now. It was mostly written by User:Ubiquitouslarry for money. That's why it was judged to a strict standard, and that explains the promotional language. OK. Just a formal announcement, I've never met the subject, corresponded with him, or even heard of him before reading this morning's news like https://www.npr.org/2022/04/26/1094740651/florida-man-asks-schools-to-ban-the-bible-following-the-states-efforts-to-remove and https://www.huffpost.com/entry/chaz-stevens-bible-ban_n_6268e98ee4b0ea625c0e2b58. So hopefully when I clean it up it will be judged to merely ordinary standards. --GRuban (talk) 17:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, C.Fred! ST47 (talk) 02:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By far the most severe problem on Wikipedia today, and well even ever has or possibly could happen, is that User:ST47/non-cu sock blocks has a redlink to User:ST47/non-cu sock blocks/header. DMacks (talk) 17:51, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, it's been a while since I've even looked at some of those reports! That one is nice though, since it's a good way to find users who maybe deserve a CU check for sleepers and who probably didn't get one. ST47 (talk) 02:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

It was reported on IRC that your tool (whois-referral.toolforge.org) was not responding. I got one of the WMCS admins to look and they've restarted it. Could you please take a look if you get a chance and see why?

Thanks, ~ RhinosF1_(Chat) / ^(Contribs) 15:38, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I have found that his bot blocked so many IP addresses due to open proxies in one day! Why the heck it was be that there!?! 2405:9800:BA20:AB7A:75EE:A289:9805:9A19 (talk) 08:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, a change has been made to the administrators inactivity policy. Under the new policy, if an administrator has not made at least 100 edits over a period of 5 years they may be desysopped for inactivity.
• Following a discussion on the bureaucrat's noticeboard, a change has been made to the bureaucrats inactivity policy.

Technical news

• The ability to undelete the associated talk page when undeleting a page has been added. This was the 11th wish of the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey.
• A public status system for WMF wikis has been created. It is located at https://www.wikimediastatus.net/ and is hosted separately to WMF wikis so in the case of an outage it will remain viewable.

Arbitration

• Remedy 2 of the St Christopher case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to place a ban on single-purpose accounts who were disruptively editing on the article St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine or related pages from those pages.

---

Your bot blocked them as a proxy. They say they've closed port 1723, which might have been the reason for that. Is it possible to check again? Daniel Case (talk) 06:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).

Guideline and policy news

• Several areas of improvement collated from community member votes have been identified in the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines. The areas of improvement have been sent back for review and you are invited to provide input on these areas.

Technical news

• Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
• The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.

Arbitration

• Remedy 2 of the Rachel Marsden case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to delete or reduce to a stub, together with their talk pages, articles related to Rachel Marsden when they violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.
• An arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been closed.

---

Accidentally sometimes i use vpn for works. I am not aware vpn restrictions in wikipedia. So, Your bot made my ip 103.122.251.167 several times. I email the authority about this. they said it is fine. But again and again my ip has been blocked. Please solve this issue. Jubair Sayeed Linas (talk) 21:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ST47,

Just wondering what rational your ProxyBot uses to determine if an IP should be hard or soft blocked? The only reason I'm asking is I've seen a few ACC requests that are hardblocked from STPB that potentially could be softened, mainly mobile networks that are probably CGNAT, this being an example. Can STPB be changed to keep these as softs - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:13, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

103.237.36.227 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), previously blocked by ST47ProxyBot, is back and making unhelpful edits. I'm not sure whether the bot accepts tip-offs or will work out whether this is an undesirable proxy for itself. Certes (talk) 19:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi--I don't quite understand the block log, with all the short blocks, so to speak. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 01:31, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Same with 70.80.99.68, 72.140.17.121, 184.148.235.219, and all have been vandalizing. Drmies (talk) 01:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user, Special:Contributions/136.57.191.25, just told me to stop making pointless edit summaries. My edits are not pointless. So could you please tell him to stop sending me messages about that? AdamDeanHall (talk) 13:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).

Technical news

• user_global_editcount is a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (T130439)

Arbitration

• An arbitration case regarding conduct in deletion-related editing has been opened.

Miscellaneous

• The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.

---

https://whois-referral.toolforge.org is currently returning a 504 Gateway Time-out error — this has happened a few times over the last few weeks. The last time this happened, I poked someone to restart it and that resolved the issue. The logs they provided last time are below, should they help.

tools.whois-referral@tools-sgebastion-10:~$ kubectl logs pod/whois-referral-8b7bfd9b5-psg8s
open("/usr/lib/uwsgi/plugins/python_plugin.so"): No such file or directory [core/utils.c line 3724]
!!! UNABLE to load uWSGI plugin: /usr/lib/uwsgi/plugins/python_plugin.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory !!!

If you're around, would you mind restarting the pod? — TNT (talk • she/her) 10:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction, the above log entries are apparently expected — the error this time was:

Thu Jul 14 10:28:43 2022 - *** uWSGI listen queue of socket ":8000" (fd: 4) full !!! (101/100) ***

It has been restarted — TNT (talk • she/her) 10:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ST47. The user who filed this UTRS mentions one of your rangeblocks. However I didn't see any reason to look further into his concern, or to modify the block. I ran a check which indicated he wasn't even using the range he complained about. Details are in the UTRS. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred and DGG: A couple of months ago I asked that you (plural) restore Chaz Stevens to userspace so I could work on it, which C.Fred did. I'm mostly ready to push it live, but if any of you have any specific issues I'd love to address them first. Or you may be amused to just read the thing. Personally, even though I tried to stick to the facts, I think parts (such as the story of the Pompano Beach Church of Satan) are hilarious - but then I wrote it, and have been accused of having a strange sense of humor. --GRuban (talk) 20:54, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That silence sounds like consensus. Live. --GRuban (talk) 17:55, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yes it's ok for mainspace, but I think it's dtill disproportionately heavy in anecdotes and overdetailed. By the way, silence implies consent doesn't work this quickly for me, I often take a week or two to reply, because I sometimes want to think first. DGG ( talk ) 19:03, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Your bot blocked my IP address for three days twice, even though I was editing from home and have never used a proxy before. I requested unblocking, asked on Discord and IRC twice, and, when that didn't work, submitted a UTRS appeal, and, when that didn't work, I followed what the answer said and emailed stewards, to which I am waiting for a reply. What should I do so that this doesn't happen again? Thanks, — VORTEX³⁴²⁷ (Talk!) 07:48, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).

Administrator changes

Valereee

Anthony Appleyard (deceased) • Capitalistroadster • Samsara

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
• An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.

Technical news

• The Wikimania 2022 Hackathon will take place virtually from 11 August to 14 August.
• Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)

Arbitration

• The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.

Miscellaneous

• You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
• Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
• Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold ⇧ Shift between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.

---

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
• An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.

Technical news

• The impact report on the effects of disabling IP editing on the Persian (Farsi) Wikipedia has been released.
• The WMF is looking into making a Private Incident Reporting System (PIRS) system to improve the reporting of harmful incidents through easier and safer reporting. You can leave comments on the talk page by answering the questions provided. Users who have faced harmful situations are also invited to join a PIRS interview to share the experience. To sign up please email Madalina Ana.

Arbitration

• An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
• The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.

Miscellaneous

• The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
• Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.

---

Hello hello. I hope this message finds you well.

The Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election ends soon, please vote. At least one of the candidates is worthy of support. --MZMcBride (talk) 14:54, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend. Was wondering if you can investigate the issue in the title. There's a thread about it at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#WHOIS not working. Thank you. –Novem Linguae (talk) 09:59, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restarted, same issue as previously mentioned — hope you're okay ST47, and your inactivity is due to positive real-life events would you consider adding me as a maintainer to https://toolsadmin.wikimedia.org/tools/id/whois-referral? — TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 21:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheresNoTime: I have no idea why it keeps crashing - toolforge's web service running system is very confusing. Normally one would expect a service to be restarted if it crashes, and logs to be emitted somewhere. I will try to add you as comaintainer. ST47 (talk) 00:09, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheresNoTime: I found your username and added you to the tool's list of maintainers. ST47 (talk) 00:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ST47 - hope you're doing well — TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 19:54, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is first time happening to me; why my IP 196.189.243.78 is blocked - I am not still understanding the actual reason why that happened. I use this IP address while editing, when I am very frustrated. And to mean, I never used the IP address for (savage) or that kind of vandalisms Wikipedia do not appreciates them. And yes, I cannot deny made mistakes but can you clearily tell me why that happened why the blocked happened so that I can really fix myself after reading what you will reply to me Simple Jack, the character (talk) 19:06, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While Claro Honduras nows mainly assigns me (and I guess a whole lot other people) IPv6 addresses, many IPs in its IPv4 block (which it still occasionally assigns) have been recurrently hit by claims of P2P proxy use, which I can guarantee you I don't use, and at least no seemingly suspect edits were seen in edit histories. An example of such histories is the one on Special:Contributions/181.115.61.24, all done personally by me. Either your API is faulty and not clearing its cache of previous proxy users or it's hitting a whole bunch of addresses in a range due to the actions of one malicious individual. You have to remember static addresses are not the norm in a whole of territories, and thus these bad implementations hurt Wikipedia's diversity of editors. 2803:4600:1116:12E7:49D8:1CE:E2D2:6B78 (talk) 04:01, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you block me from editing Objectivescholar (talk) 07:39, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

My house IP address lies within a range blocked by you some time age due web hosts present (185.223.0.0/16).

The problem is, I do have a home media server exposed through http(s), as such other admin recommended I contact you. There are no tor exit nodes nor proxies running on my network.

I there anything I could do to be able to use my home network to edit wikipedia?

Thanks Oneardicento (talk) 18:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ST47 for a couple of months I have been having a problem with a Bot operated by you ST47ProxyBot, it continues to block me continuously for no reason caused by me, I do not use Proxy or VPN,Peer-to-peer of any kind, this does not allow me to edit foe weeks and continues blocking by mistake without me changing my IP address, it's frustrating when I have not issued any apparent reason for such blocking. I don't understand why your Bot block me from editing. Evanex (talk) 04:31, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Evanex: It appears that several IP addresses that you have recently used are indeed also acting as P2P proxies. I was about to give you IP block exemption, but it seems you already have it. ST47 (talk) 15:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, consensus was found that if the rationale for a block depends on information that is not available to all administrators, that information should be sent to the Arbitration Committee, a checkuser or an oversighter for action (as applicable, per ArbCom's recent updated guidance) instead of the administrator making the block.
• Following an RfC, consensus has been found that, in the context of politics and science, the reliability of FoxNews.com is unclear and that additional considerations apply to its use.
• Community comment on the revised Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines is requested until 8 October.

Technical news

• The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

Arbitration

• Remedy 8.1 of the Muhammad images case will be rescinded 1 November following a motion.
• A modification to the deletion RfC remedy in the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been made to reaffirm the independence of the RfC and allow the moderators to split the RfC in two.
• The second phase of the 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review closes 3 October.

Miscellaneous

• An administrator's account was recently compromised. Administrators are encouraged to check that their passwords are secure, and reminded that ArbCom reserves the right to not restore adminship in cases of poor account security. You can also use two-factor authentication (2FA) to provide an extra level of security.
• Self-nominations for the electoral commission for the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections open 2 October and close 8 October.
• You are invited to comment on candidates in the 2022 CUOS appointments process.
• An RfC is open to discuss whether to make Vector 2022 the default skin on desktop.
• Tech tip: You can do a fuzzy search of all deleted page titles at Special:Undelete.

---

ST47, in the slew of IPs that I blocked there were two proxies that you had placed blocks on earlier. If you have a moment, would you have a look at the others, and see if they need (longer) proxy blocks? Ranges would be even better... Thanks, Drmies (talk) 12:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you see if 178.170.8.57 needs to be blocked again? It's being abused by a blocked editor. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 14:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).

Guideline and policy news

• The article creation at scale RfC opened on 3 October and will be open until at least 2 November.
• An RfC is open to discuss having open requests for adminship automatically placed on hold after the seven-day period has elapsed, pending closure or other action by a bureaucrat.

Arbitration

• Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 13 November 2022 until 22 November 2022 to stand in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections.
• The arbitration case request titled Athaenara has been resolved by motion.
• The arbitration case Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block has entered the proposed decision stage.
• AmandaNP, Mz7 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2022 Arbitration Committee Elections. Xaosflux and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.

Miscellaneous

• The 2022 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of two new CheckUsers.
• You can add yourself to the centralised page listing time zones of administrators.
• Tech tip: Wikimarkup in a block summary is parsed in the notice that the blockee sees. You can use templates with custom options to specify situations like {{rangeblock|create=yes}} or {{uw-ublock|contains profanity}}.

---