User talk:Rje

This user may have left Wikipedia. Rje has not edited Wikipedia since September 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

user

talk

watched

user links

Welcome to my talk page. If you have any comments, questions, queries, insults etc. please feel free to add them to the bottom of the page and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.

• Archive 1 - October 2004/February 2005
• Archive 2 - March/April 2005
• Archive 3 - May/July 2005
• Archive 4 - August/October 2005
• Archive 5 - November 2005/June 2006
• Archive 6 - July 2006/August 2007
• Archive 7 - August 2007/October 2009
• Current - October 2009 to present

"There are two claims that have been added to the article in the past week, neither of which are verified nor attributed to any source. I have attempted to tag these appropriately, but it keeps being removed in place of weasel words. Repeated reversion of an article between two editors is known as an edit war, and is never allowed under any circumstances. When two editors are warring, as would be the case if the reverting were to continue, then consensus should be sought on its talk page. Failure to resolve difference through this medium will result in third party intervention.

The two claims in question are: [edit] Reference to 'Boston'

The rugby league club were granted the East Stand, which they renamed 'The Boston Stand' in tribute to the Welsh winger Billy Boston, although Wigan Athletic fans jokingly claim the name derives from Boston United whose failure to achieve promotion to the Football League in 1978 led to the inclusion of the Wigan club.

A source has been linked to the claim which confirms Wigan Athletic did indeed take Boston United FC's place in the Football League. This was never in question. What I questioned was whether Wigan Athletic fans really do jokingly refer to 'Boston' in this way. A simple Google search produces not so much as a newspaper article or a blog to support this statement. GW(talk) 22:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

I'd say if it's not sourced, get rid of it per WP:V. It's not particularly encyclopedic anyway. Nev1 (talk) 22:47, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

I agree. I am unconvinced that this is really encyclopedic anyway, obviously something such as this would have to be sourced if it were to remain. Surely if the fans made a big deal of this there would be some mention of it somewhere. Rje (talk) 13:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Harry Lyon (fans choice)

As Wigan Athletic had spent many years in the lower leagues it was recognised that most of the players were not known at national level and as the fans' choice, Harry Lyon, had already been honoured at the site of their former home, Springfield Park, the ground's main West Stand was renamed 'The Springfield Stand', in recognition of the club's original base.

Firstly, recognised by whom? Wikipedia demands that all claims be linked to reliable sources. To claim that something has been recognised without actually saying who it has been recognised by implies authority and thus violates this guideline.

Secondly, no source has been linked to the claim that Wigan Athletic fans were given a poll to decide on their player, or that Harry Lyon was voted, or that he was overlooked in favour of Springfield Park because he has already been honoured. Again, a simple Google search produces no results to confirm any of these claims and inferences. GW(talk) 22:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

You're right about having a source for the claim of recognition. It would seem odd to me that the club would go against the wishes of the fans on something like this and for there to be no mention of it in a reliable source. The fact that the Springfield Stand is named after the old stadium should remain, but the rest should go if there isn't a source for it. Rje (talk) 13:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)"

Rje, with all due respect, I don't think you have any link to Wigan or the sporting clubs therin and therefore do not understand the mentality of supporters of both clubs. Think fans of Liverpool and Manchester United: they are not the best of friends. Although from different sports, you have the same situation in Wigan with Wigan Athletic and Wigan Warriors with the supporters of one team undermining the other at every opportunity. You will never be rid of an edit war. Ginger Warrior by his username is a supporter of Wigan Warriors and will no doubt call to question anything that views Wigan Athletic in a more favourable light, gives them more Wikispace than the rugby club or indeed pokes fun. Please bear this in mind. I refer to his comment as proof of this: 'A source has been linked to the claim which confirms Wigan Athletic did indeed take Boston United FC's place in the Football League. This was never in question. What I questioned was whether Wigan Athletic fans really do jokingly refer to 'Boston' in this way. A simple Google search produces not so much as a newspaper article or a blog to support this statement. GW(talk) 22:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)' You could flip the point between opposing fans forever and a day, but this will be seen as a detrimental comment by the rugby fraternity while being made frequently by football fans verbally and on messageboards. Do some research rather than relying on the limitations of Google.

The comment 'It would seem odd to me that the club would go against the wishes of the fans' is laughable as the owner of Wigan Athletic makes all the decisions, the fans don't get a say and never have had one. This is the official statement from the club: [1] which reads like there had been numerous discussions which is complete rubbish. Mr Whelan had the campaign brought to his attention by local journalist, Paul Kendrick (Wigan Observer) and made the decision to rename days later. Also the Latics representative Mike Taylor was unknown to the majority of Wigan Athletic fans. This is where the renaming campaign began and this is a fact!: [2]. The fans wanted The Springfield Park Stand only to be given The Springfield Stand. If you follow the link, click the 'Springfield Park Stand' link at the top right of the page where you can follow the campaign in its entirity. Unfortunately most of Springfied Park's history was in the time before the internet so nearly all the references are on fansites such as the Springfield Park Memorial. This has been researched over a period of 15 years through newspaper articles and the few publications available by a number of people and is the nearest thing you will find to a history of the ground. I hope this clears up the situation —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.25.77 (talk) 13:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have misunderstood me. I do not consider the specific banter between rival fans to be especially noteworthy. Unless such exchanges are picked up by a wider audience, I do not think they are worth noting in an article. I honestly do not consider message boards to be a reliable source.

You quoted me out of context on the second point. I did not question the fact that the stand was named after Springfield Park, merely that it would be odd for there to be no record of a poll of supporters. All information on Wikipedia should be backed by verifiable, reliable sources. This is the primary concern of both myself and Ginger Warrior on this point. Rje (talk) 12:27, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You commented in the last Article for deletion discussion. This article is up for deletion again.

You are welcome to comment about the discussion for deletion. Ikip 19:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rje, is there any site where you can get pictures of a person without having to ask permission, or if not how do you ask permission? I'm asking this because I saw that you were the one that gave various league players a picture. P.S. What site do you use? Josh the newcastle fan (talk) 14:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article was tagged as an unreferenced BLP. I'm working my way through the unreferenced BLPs in the Children's Literature Project, referencing those I can and PRODing those which don't meet Wikipedia's criteria (with discussion within the project). Peter Härtling appears to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria but my knowledge of the German language and German literature is not sufficient to be able to deal with getting this article referenced properly. I've added one reference (to the author's website) but this is really not enough. I'm mentioning it to you in case you feel like helping. --Plad2 (talk) 21:49, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just seen your work on this. Thank you very much!--Plad2 (talk) 23:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks very good. I've requested a reassessment from the Children's Literature Portal.--Plad2 (talk) 07:31, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I agree. An article that consists of nothing but an infobox is a complete waste and should be deleted. Unfortunately, consensus is not on the side of logic and reason in this particular case. I took a beating at my second RFA for this nom [3], even though an admin did end up deleting it. I'm not going to restore it or anything, I just thought you should be aware that such a deletion is not actually supported by the policy as currently worded, since context was established by said infobox. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On February 23, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Manuel Pinho, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wtf? why you delet Andrejs Sinicins all rights is save and real. To these player ie more ling in website. If you don`t now thet people why you delet. First of all you need search in internet to his name and surname and see all is right. 09:41, 23 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Z1nz1n1z1n (talk • contribs)

There was an AfD discussion about that article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrejs Siņicins. The consensus then was that the article did not meet Wikipedia's policy on notability. I deleted the recreation of the article as it contravened Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion G4, which allows for the speedy deletion of any article that is a recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion. This has nothing to do with whether Andrejs Siņicins is a real person, but whether he is considered notable by the definition outlined in Wikipedia's policies. Let me know if you have any questions. Best wishes, Rje (talk) 00:10, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your addition to the coaches section. It's difficult to find info about the third team! Raul17 (talk) 00:48, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thanks for your answer.

In fact, the building is offically known as One World Trade Center, 1 World Trade Center is it´s adress. Other buildings have an "One" as well at the beginning: for example One Prudential Plaza, One Liberty Plaza and much others. The buildings known as One World Trade Center by it´s developer (owner), the Port Authority: [4], the architect: [5] in the media: [6] & [7] and by secondary sources: [8] and here is listed, that 1 World Trade Center is only the adress. I think that should be enough. Regards, Jerchel (talk) 14:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I copyed the message on the talk page. At German Wikipedia I wrote the same on the talk page but no one replied. There was no discussion. After a few weeks I wrote that I will move the page in the next days. And I did. Until today nobody disagreed. Jerchel (talk) 16:38, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please request to move on the page "requested moves" with copying my message. I do not know how this works, because we do not have a such page in German Wikipedia. Jerchel (talk) 17:34, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your help. How long does it take until it is decided? I don´t know how this works, because we do not have such a page. Jerchel (talk) 18:18, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know what will happen now? A week is now passed. I think we should move the article now. Jerchel (talk) 14:06, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I notice that you recently deleted this talk page connected to the article Dennis Willis under speedy deletion criteria G7, "Author Requests Deletion". However, G7 says:

...if requested in good faith and provided that the only substantial content to the page and to the associated talk page was added by its author.

I would interpret this to mean that the "only substantial content" criteria is to be judged by the contributions to both the article and the talk page. In this case, while User:DJWJR may well have been the only contributor to the article's talk page, that's not the case of the article itself, where myself and one other editor also contributed.

Considering this, I wonder if you would think about undoing the deletion. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for taking the time to explain the deletion - I understand, and, under the circumstances you describe, your action was entirely justified. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:16, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just for you information, he/she almost likely a sock of banned user., 23prootie (talk · contribs) just here to cause some trouble as usual. Account already hardblocked for being a VOA. Elockid ^(Talk·_Contribs) 21:13, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dude, you're the man! Krymson (talk) 02:41, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this deletion, I forgot to do so.

Seivolia (talk) 10:23, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rje has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and therefore, I've officially declared today as Rje's day! For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian, enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Rje! Peace, Rlevse 00:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply] A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, the reason for the CSD is that the article does not explain what it is other than it is a competition - a competition for what ? - will leave it a few days see what the creator adds. Codf1977 (talk) 15:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks The distinction between speedy, prod, and AfD confuses me sometimes. Thanks again. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:46, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SOmetimes I don't know which to pick ~Darth Starbo 13:32, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was not a typo and just because it was a stub doesn't mean you can just go ahead and delete it!!! - Winner 42 (talk) 16:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article I deleted was not a stub, it was a redirect to Denise (given name). The redirect was an orphan and anyone searching for DeNyse would automatically end up at the variant spelling Denyse, which would be more appropriate, it therefore seemed to me that the redirect was redundant. Your stub had been replaced by the time I deleted it, presumably instead of PRODing it. I can restore your version of the article, but you would have to provide sources that show why it is worthy of inclusion, otherwise it will be listed for deletion. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information - we don't need articles about every surname in the world, especially where we don't have any articles relating to people with that surname. Let me know what you want to do. Best wishes, Rje (talk) 17:27, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I just added new info to CADIVI articleAbe41 (talk) 22:22, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, why would they want to delete Abdullah Al-Dosari (singer), why, please remove the mass of Articles for deletion, if allowed, thank you Goodbye my friend .--Black Man 89 (talk) 11:10, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you help me out with this one. I put the history on my talk page. I would be grateful for some advice. Manchesterfire (talk) 01:15, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rje I think you are right to highlight this but my point was that this is not just the same article again. In February he was called as a witness to give evidence to a House of Commons select committee which is a pretty big deal. He holds senior office as the leader of a sub national authority as well as being a key leader in the main citywide government of a major metropolitan city. Can you look at this again please? (Manchesterfire (talk) 00:52, 1 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

An article you previously deleted has been restarted - with a perhaps deliberate mis-spelling at 2010 Motorsport Calendary. You may wish to weigh in at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Motorsport Calendary‎. --Falcadore (talk) 02:41, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm new. I didn't consider the Altoona Community Theatre a group, corporation, etc., but thanks for correcting me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrStrangelove64 (talk • contribs) 16:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the article's deletion was completely right. I didn't really think about it at the time, but it was too vague. If I decide to recreate the article in the future, I'll study its significance first. Thanks for fixing it. (: —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrStrangelove64 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 16:14, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

23:59, 1 August 2010 Rje (talk | contribs) deleted "Nuclear Microprobe" ‎ (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://icnmta.atomki.hu/)

Dear Rje,

I'm sorry for the Unambiguous copyright infringement, but I've created http://icnmta.atomki.hu/ too. I'm a member of the international copmmittee of the ICNMTA conference series. ICNMTA - International Conference on Nuclear Microprobe Technology and Applications, the 12th of the series was organized in Leipzig, Germany, and just finished a few days ago. The International Committee has decided to create wiki pages for the Nuclear Microprobe, which is a unique intstrument, you can see a list of such microprobes at e.g. <http://icnmta.atomki.hu/microprobefac.html>, and the list of all conferences here: <http://www.icnmta2010.de/?node=19>.

So, I meant to just create a page for the nuclear microprobe with the starter one paragraph (that you were right, I've copied from my previous page), but then ask a lot of people to join me improving it. We actually have a quite long table of content in mind, so this will be a good page, I believe.

I also added a minor correction to the existing "microprobe" wiki entry, especially because experts were invited since 2005 to improve the page... Since I'm an active scientist in the field, I suppose I would be an eligible person to do this.

So, I'll re-paste the paragraph now, and send a circular to all my colleagues in the field. This time please don't delete my page.

Many thanks.

Istvan Rajta

(Irajta) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irajta (talk • contribs) 19:07, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Rje,

Thank for your advice. Since the ATOMKI page with a similar content was old, I decided to remove it, and use this text only on Wikipedia. Thus a copyright problem doesn't exist anymore.

Thanks.

Irajta —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irajta (talk • contribs) 19:21, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rje, looks like you removed the page I just authored about my company, BlooSee. I don't get it. No explanation was given about why that article didn't meet A7 requirements. It clearly explained the relevance of the company, what it does, how it enables Web users to geolocate information about the oceans. Wikipedia allows the pages for companies, including similar ones to BlooSee, like: CloudMade. We're a boot-strapped start-up trying to sprout a shoot in this world and to be shot down by wikipedia, that's supposed to be all about letting people share and receive knowledge freely, without the intermediation of a stogy publisher, really hurts. If there is something specific that was objectionable, I would be happy to change it. The article clearly said why BlooSee is significant and why its relevant to its users and how it operates, same as do other articles about companies. Please take a second look at the last version of the article and kindly restore it. I am myself a wikipedia contributor since 2004 and a friend of Jimmy Wales from back then. I have unfortunately been locked out of my old user profile "vlado" and had to create a new one to write about BlooSee, but you can see my past contributions going back to 2004 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Vlado. I can receive a reply at VladoD. Here's my LinkedIn profile to show I'm a real person, not some spam: www.linkedin.com/in/vladod —Preceding unsigned comment added by VladoD (talk • contribs) 11:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rje, I reposted a revised article for BlooSee, but it got deleted again, though this time it looks to be moved to User:VladoD/BlooSee. User:Timneu22 deleted the article this time. I've asked for an explanation, but the deletion is happening so quickly that it seems no human in bothering to even read it. Can you help me get this through? I followed your directions and added links to external news references and followed the structure and content of other similar companies, CloudMade which is an online mapping company and Facebook, since BlooSee is mapping+social media. I've been up all night in my time zone here in California writing and rewriting this and reaching the end of my fuse. VladoD (talk) 14:09, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I saved an edit right as you were cleaning up the page move vandalism, could you zap the talk page again for Talk:Brendan Cook Social Club Triona (talk) 09:20, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you recently deleted my page DesecrationCrew, which was a page that i really needed. it was nominated for speedy deletion uner A7 (no indication of importance). i am a member of the group the article was about and i made the article to help us. i made it rather quickly, so i didnt put much information in the article, but i had the full intention of coming back and writing much more on the topic. could you please do what is in your power to let me have that page back and next time, i think it would be much betterif you warned someone before deleting a page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Personhiyastuff (talk • contribs) 06:12, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for cropping those pictures of the Lyon players at the Emirates Cup and adding them to their pages. However, it seems the user at Flickr who took the pictures misidentified Jean-Alain Boumsong and the picture you posted to his page is, in fact, Harry Novillo. Just letting you know so you can make the proper correction. Good job and, again, thanks for cropping and posting them. Joao10Siamun (talk) 19:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it's me again. I was wondering if you could crop this picture here of the players on the far right, the first being Aly Cissokho and the second player being Maxime Gonalons. Thanks. — Joao10Siamun (talk) 10:05, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. File:Aly Cissokho.jpg looks great. Have been really wanting to expand his article for awhile now and wanted a picture to make it more readable. As you said, File:Maxime Gonalons.jpg doesn't look that great, but it will probably will have to do for the time being. Thanks for the help. — Joao10Siamun (talk) 15:14, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My recent attempt to create pages Anya Selecki / Anya Saleky was done as a test to see how Wiki Pedia works.

I am Anya Selecki and in 1975-76, I played JaJa Gibson in Number 96 using the stage name Anya Saleky . At this time, I also appeared in the Paul Hogan’s and many other TV Shows.

Anya Saleky is referred to under Number 96 and the Paul Hogan Shows, but it links to a non existing page.

I have been writing a CV to create a page to provide more details on me (Anya Selecki/ stage name Saleky). Please let me know what would be the most appropriate way to do so in Wikipedia

Regards, Anya Selecki —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anya selecki (talk • contribs) 22:42, 9 August 2010 (UTC) 184.32.66.219 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:51, 9 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]

You deleted this page about this band a while ago. I'm not sure what constitutes a sufficient standard of notability but they are an up and coming band who have performed on several major festivals. I'd be glad to find some references to back that up if that would get the page back up. Wppds (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:13, 13 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:46, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there RJE, VASCO from Portugal here,

about my changes at Fernando Martínez Perales and Francisco Liaño, they were for the best - as your article creation indeed - and i'll explain now:

1 - I don't think that after the division in which a club plays has been determined in storyline, "LA LIGA" or "LIGUE 1" should be written again, etc, just write "finished third", not "finish third in La Liga".

2 - After a big part of storyline has been devoted to one particular club, no need to write "left DEPORTIVO with x official appearances", just "left the club..." or "left...".

3 - No need, in my humble opinion, to put full stops constantly and then write "He did this or that" again. Allow for some "freedom" with the commas, please.

4 - I think that stuff like BDFUTBOL.com belongs as external link not reference, as it is a mere site with stats.

Nothing more for the moment, whistle if you have any doubts, best wishes to you to and keep up the good work (and sorry for any incovenience) - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey thanks for the message, RJ, here's my (a bit late, only saw it now though) reply, "bit-by-bit" according to your text:

1 - Some folks might not know what "back" is, but EVERYBODY must surely know what "defender", and it's more often than not (although "back" is undoubtedly preferred) used in English language;

2 and 3 - I really do not understand where have i failed, but i'll try to rewrite the intro;

4 - Why is it not "elegant"? Because i omitted the word "team" and wrote just "local Levante UD", which is a team, thus making it implicit?

5 - I really think that both your way and mine are perfectly OK (i assure you that "helping X team promote" is 100% correct), but no worries, i'll write yours;

6 - OK, i'll write "he" all over the place, although i fail to see why, your grammatical explanation "won the prize" :);

7 - OK, we'll lose the 1/2 stuff;

8 and 9 - I'll rewrite those bits better. Cheers and keep up the good work - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 14:03, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nanny mcphee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:26, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Freedomland.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:48, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I went to add a template to the article and saw "A page with this title has previously been deleted." I took the liberty of recreating the page by adding the templates. I hope that's okay. Thanks! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

	The Mistagged BLP Cleanup Barnstar
	This barnstar does not cite any references or sources.[1][2][3] For your work with mistagged BLPs, thank you! The list is now empty with your help. Gigs (talk) 05:41, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Like mike.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:45, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Death at a funeral.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Year of the yao.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:44, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hoodwinked.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 15:51, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 12:30, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 12:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nanny mcphee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Last Mimzy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:29, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Herbiefl poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Steamboy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Cryptic 04:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Scooby doo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:High tension poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mr and mrs smith poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:I Want Candy (2007 film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:03, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rje, Greetings to you. I have removed the source of your article sources have pointed to either error page or no found - see here [9], [10], [11] and [12]. Kindly help to recite. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:15, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Daniel Sirera has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Vermont (talk) 09:42, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Date movie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Juwanna mann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Melinda and melinda poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Nanny mcphee.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mr. Magorium.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:After the Wedding.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:35, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		Congratulations!
		The Anne Rice Award honors editors who have improved Wikipedia's coverage of women writers by creating a biography of a woman writer who, like Anne Rice, used a pen name, nom de plume, literary initials, or pseudonym on the title page or by-line of her works in place of her real name. On behalf of WP:WPWW, thank you for creating the biography on Julia Nyberg, who wrote as Euphrosyne. --Rosiestep (talk) 21:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mr. Magorium.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Worlds fastest indian.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the edit that Chris Evans is married to Alba Baptista. We were Married on 8/29/2023. I am his wife. The entire world knows that. My identity is not being hidden. We are not pretending I'm a Hispanic women for my protection or anyone's reputation. We are happily, openly married. This edit is not factual.

Add my name as his wife. Nyleamah Tinnell Kinsey-Evans. You have my permission.

Kindest Regards Nyleamah Evans Nyleamahevans (talk) 15:05, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]