User talk:Petergriffin9901/Archive 33
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Petergriffin9901. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 |
Reference Errors on 9 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Tokyo Dome page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
I know you are a huge Mariah Carey fan, but can you just be impersonal and stop adding false information to her tour page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KMO2014 (talk • contribs) 13:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
The date of the publication was "May 17, 2003", at that time, the tour didn't even hit the road. "$16 million" was totally not realiable. By the way, "$16 million" was not even reported by Billboard Boxscore or Pollstar, just by an article that no one would notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KMO2014 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Guess who's going to see Mariah in Vegas...
ME!! — ₳aron 11:11, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- Which day? Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Calvin999:@SNUGGUMS: That's awesome! What date? I'm excited to see her tackle her old classics. With Caesars' reputation, I'm sure the production is going to be great! Also, Mariah seems to be moving back to Sony/Epic with LA Leid which is huge. New years and projects ahead. I feel like without Nick she'll be all work and snatching weaves :) PS. You guys making a tour page?--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 03:14, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- See Number Ones (Mariah Carey residency). I so far haven't been very involved with its article, though that could change later on. Of course you say things are better without sir Cannon :P. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:27, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'm honestly disappointed in both of them. After her injury in July 13', it all went downhill career wise, gained weight and marriage issues :/ She said on Ellen that she started TECS with bronchitis, which makes sense considering how poorly she sounded during the early shows, getting progressively better. The 6 sold out Beacon shows were great. Looks like the Vegas tickets are selling well as well and well get a good set-list. PS. SNUGGS. Why is that residency not part of any of her tour articles of chronology/botton chart boxes etc?--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 07:58, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- See Number Ones (Mariah Carey residency). I so far haven't been very involved with its article, though that could change later on. Of course you say things are better without sir Cannon :P. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:27, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Calvin999:@SNUGGUMS: That's awesome! What date? I'm excited to see her tackle her old classics. With Caesars' reputation, I'm sure the production is going to be great! Also, Mariah seems to be moving back to Sony/Epic with LA Leid which is huge. New years and projects ahead. I feel like without Nick she'll be all work and snatching weaves :) PS. You guys making a tour page?--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 03:14, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
I'm going 22nd July, in Vegas for 5 days. I'm going only to see her lol — ₳aron 09:02, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Do tell if you meet her, Calvin999! Petergriffin9901, if you mean TECS's article, it is listed in chronology. However, Template:Mariah Carey has (erroneously) been fully protected since this past October, preventing anyone from adding it to there :/. IndianBio has asked for that to be reduced. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:04, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- As much as I'd like to and get M&G tickets, when I did it for Rihanna is was a huge rip-off and totally not worth it at all. And the ones for Mariah are too over-priced. So I won't do it for anyone, because you don't know what kind of experience you will get or how you will be treated. — ₳aron 15:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- I saw Mimi for her AA Tour in 2010 and was about 10 feet from her for like 2 hours filming her Christmas Day Parade :) Was so surreal to see the queen in person lol. I generally do not go to concerts. They are super expensive and I don't like most artists enough ;)--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 05:10, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- As much as I'd like to and get M&G tickets, when I did it for Rihanna is was a huge rip-off and totally not worth it at all. And the ones for Mariah are too over-priced. So I won't do it for anyone, because you don't know what kind of experience you will get or how you will be treated. — ₳aron 15:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Sugar (Maroon 5 song)". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! –Chase (talk / contribs) 23:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mariah Carey Feat Rick Ross & Meek Mill - Triumphant (Get ‘Em).ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Mariah Carey Feat Rick Ross & Meek Mill - Triumphant (Get ‘Em).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:46, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mariah Carey - Can't Live if Living is Without You.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Mariah Carey - Can't Live if Living is Without You.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
File:TTRnew2.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TTRnew2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 08:41, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Belated
Happy belated 24th birthday! Sorry I missed this by a day, but hope you enjoyed it this year :). Regards, Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Didn't Mean To Turn You On (Mariah Carey song - sample).ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Didn't Mean To Turn You On (Mariah Carey song - sample).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lead The Way (Mariah Carey song - sample).ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Lead The Way (Mariah Carey song - sample).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:AAtour.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:AAtour.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Mariah Carey Butterfly image.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mariah Carey Butterfly image.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 09:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Mariah-carey-the-roof.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mariah-carey-the-roof.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 09:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:101-Mariah Carey-betcha gon know.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:101-Mariah Carey-betcha gon know.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited All I Want for Christmas Is You, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Mayor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mariah Carey - Migrate.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Mariah Carey - Migrate.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:00, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mariah Carey - I Stay in Love.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Mariah Carey - I Stay in Love.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:00, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Whitney Houston discography
Hi - I don't feel semi-protection is indicated here, so I put pending changes on it for one year. I see you are not a pending changes reviewer; if you would like me to give you that user right, ping me back and I'll do it. Regardless, remember that with pending changes you will see disruptive edits while you are logged in, but those who are not logged in – the vast, vast majority of page views – will not. Thanks. :-) Katietalk 03:26, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- @KrakatoaKatie: Thanks for your reply Katie. I've been editing for seven years, yet with my absences lately and devotion to mainly work/article improvement consuming most of my contributions, I've really lost a lot of my know-how on policy, rights etc. I'm honestly not 100% sure what you proposed, but if it means I'll have a better way of monitoring said article against IP edits then I would truly appreciate it. Feel free to educate me a tad on some of the specifics won't you :) Cheers.--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 03:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
pending changes reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Katietalk 15:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- If you have questions after reading the policies and guidelines and working a bit with the PC pages, let me know. You'll catch on quickly. As I said, you (and all logged-in editors) will see all the disruptive edits, so it may appear that pending changes isn't working. However, anonymous/IP viewers will only see the last accepted revision; all you have to do is revert it with a brief explanation, as you have been doing already. Katietalk 15:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
I see you haven't been around very much these days. This post is to let you know that your name has been added to the page linked above due to inactivity. Please remember to remove yourself from the list if you return. Take care, Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:45, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
August 2016
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 11:09, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
- Blocking admin note - These are the relevant edits: addition of content, challenge of content, reinstatement of challenged content without consensus. This is the applicable page restriction, that appears upon clicking edit: Template:Editnotices/Page/Hillary Clinton. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 11:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Blocking admin note - The block may be lifted by any administrator on one condition: Petergriffin9901 must agree to self-revert, and must affirm that they will not violate Arbitration sanctions again. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 11:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)