User talk:Lugia2453/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Lugia2453. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Sandy Hook NJ has been erased and correct information has been entered. Facebook users are directed towards Sandy Hook, NJ, when the correct information is Sandy Hook, CT— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thrash4u (talk • contribs)

• @Thrash4U, you surely must realize that there is a disambiguation link at the top of the page to show that the Sandy Hook shooting is a different article. In addition, Facebook redirects are not, anywhere in Wikipedia policy, a reason to completely change a page.155blue (talk) 02:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Then how about you explain to me how to change it with a correct redirect, since there is absolutely no way to do it? The shooting has absolutely NOTHING to do with the subject, and is not even relevant to the situation. Lets try to stay on topic and not detract from the conversation at hand.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thrash4u (talk • contribs)

• The disambiguation page has a link to Sandy Hook, Connecticut. The Sandy Hook page has a link to said disambiguation page. What, for example, would happen if we tried to use your idea with Washington Township? Just because it is most relevant to your area does not mean it is relevant to the entire world (as with the many Washington Townships). Sandy Hook, NJ is the most well-known Sandy Hook out there and thus, the article Sandy Hook is about Sandy Hook, NJ. This is also why it is not about Sandy Hook, CT.155blue (talk) 02:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

I disagree with you greatly on the relevance and "well known" city of Sandy Hook CT, Unless you have lived under a rock for the past 7 months, Sandy Hook, CT is the epicenter of historical significance around the entire GLOBE. It is entirely relevant in this day and age, and is undeniably 600% more well known than a city in New Jersey. No offence to people who live in Sandy Hook, New Jersey, but when people think of Sandy Hook, they automatically think of Sandy Hook Connecticut.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thrash4u (talk • contribs)

• Let's not be biased toward more recent events as per WP:RECENT. Sandy Hook, NJ has been known for many years all across the Eastern Seaboard. Besides being the northernmost point on the Jersey Shore, it also has a rich history that spans countless years. This history far surpasses the ten-year test (WP:10YT). This, like the Amish school shooting, may not be as remembered as the legacy of a long-standing series of military bases and a beach. Also, you went against consensus to change a page's entire contents. The School Shooting has its own page, as does the village within Newtown. The changing of the entire page's contents rapidly and drastically is against Wikipedia policy and, though made in good faith, could be considered edit warring. 155blue(talk) 13:46, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Biased? Again I completely disagree, and you sir are wrong. COMPLETELY wrong in your opinions which are self based. Try looking outside your own world and personal bubble. Maybe reading a newspaper or two on a regular basis. I am not going to argue any longer with you, as obviously your misinformation, and you OWN BIAS has completely enveloped your thinking process. Have a good day, pal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thrash4u (talk • contribs) 22:44, 10 July 2013 (UTC) 

Look this is really important, to me sir this is my best friends band, and i love them to death they are very important becuase they go against all odds to become a great band , and they are really good. You understand how hard it is to make a band, let alone become good or noticed. Please understand me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Riptherev5454 (talk • contribs)

I find that the comments I made on the Cheez-it page were of good mind and I don't in tend to vandalize it. Please take this into consideration.

Sincerely, Nolifeguy21— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nolifeguy21 (talk • contribs)

so typing the word square on a censors page = level 2 warning...? pathetic —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.131.219.47 (talk) 21:40, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

I received a message from this user claiming to undo some really offensive statements I allegedly made on Tom Cotton's Wikipedia page. I just want to be clear that I did no such thing, and the comments attributed to me are disgustingly offensive. No further discussion on the matter is necessary, I just want to make it clear that I did not make those statements and/or changes and I do not adopt their mean-spiritedness. — Preceding unsignedcomment added by 64.134.197.209 (talk) 19:43, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello there, I tagged the rest of the articles that User:napoleon of france created under CSD A1. (as you might have seen) Redalert2fan (talk) 21:13, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for contacting me. I did not mean to vandalize. I am new to twitter and it is confusing. I didn't know how to say he was no longer a minor league player since he made his major league debut. The blank page was a mistake. I am sorry. I just want to keep baseball states updated. Not change anyone's work. CRussG (talk) 03:32, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey, I just signed up for a user name. Could you delete my entries all together? I am at work and don't want someone to have my IP address? JHayden822 (talk) 21:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Jennifer

• Unfortunately, I can't do this because I'm not an administrator, so I can't delete entries altogether. Your entries are always kept in the history of the articles you edited unless they are deleted through revision deletion, which only administrators can do. You'll want to ask an administrator to do this for you. You can see the list of administrators at Wikipedia:List of administrators. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

I understand your concerns Lugia2453 with regards to the edit however, with all due respect, I am an ex-pupil of the school and am in a position to post reliable and factually correct information, also you have named yourself after a pokemon, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by90.215.95.62 (talk) 21:53, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

I know that you are concerned about the edits that I made to the episode pokemon, I choose you!. id didn't how to put the dash over the e.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.222.214.117 (talk • contribs)

Surely I can post my own opinion (backed up by events) on elisabeth sladens page? I'm sick of reading what a saint she ws when in reality she was a horrible cunt. 92.3.235.156 (talk) 19:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

^ (Non-administrator comment) hmm.. I think he has done things other than vandalism, but that's just my opinion. Ginsuloft (talk) 20:28, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

I've informed the blocking admin he's made a mistake. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:34, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

I blocked you by mistake, instead of another editor. Then there was considerable delay in posting a correction because of endless "The Wikipedia database is temporarily in read-only mode" messages when I tried to edit. Apologies.JamesBWatson (talk) 20:51, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Actually, I'm not sure that it was my mistake. It seems that it may have been a software bug, because I was just now brought to editing your talk page when I certainly clicked on "edit" on another user's talk page, so I guess that was what happened with the block too. Also, as far as I know I had not seen or done anything to do with your account when the block took place, so it is difficult to see how i could have mistakenly blocked it. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:59, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Not sure what to do here, I'm new to talk pages. I was reading the wiki page on my hometown of Terrace. BC, Canada, and noticed someone had used a photograph of mine on the page! I was stoked!! Alas, there was no mention of credit and whoever posted it said the photo was shot over two years later than it actually was. I merely corrected the date the photo was taken and listed my photography portfolio domain as a credit to the photo. Why was it removed? I didn't even know my work was on the page, let alone mislabeled and uncredited. I deserve to correct the false information.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.232.226.223 (talk • contribs)

• Oh, I thought it was a spam link, which explains why I reverted it. Still, credit for the image is in the file description page of the file, which you can see by clicking on the image, and doesn't need to be credited on the page itself. Also, two things:

1) Sign your messages on discussion pages such as this one with four tildes (~).
2) New messages on my talk page should go to the bottom of the page. Lugia2453 (talk) 19:42, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

COOL BEANS! Thanks for the explination! 216.232.226.223 (talk) 22:15, 20 July 2013 (UTC)www.chasehamilton.ca

Thanks for your work on the edit war that had started. User got my talk page with the disruptive editing page as well.TRL (talk) 19:00, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

They weren't the creator of the page :) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 21:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

• I know. I caught that mistake pretty quickly and reverted it. Since the user is advertising a website of the same name on the article, I've reported him/her. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:14, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

I think Streambox's page looks fine. I dont understand why it was reported. — Precedingunsigned comment added by Abcdeliana (talk •contribs) 22:39, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

• It was reported for not being notable, and that fact that the user created it to promote the company (note how the username is of the company). I admit the warning I gave you shouldn't have happened, but the article should still be deleted for the reasons I talked about. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:43, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

why do u delete my article????? i have many research into this topic so i am sure this fact to be true??? it is very rude to delete my hard workings bich — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.248.139 (talk) 21:50, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

SORRY I AM ON PCP SORRY ALSO WATCH MY NEW MOVIE BIX NOOD AND KAZZOIR NUTZZZ N VEJANGS AND AND AND MY EDIT ON BARD COLLEGE WAS DONE BY DEAD DADDY| REST IN PEICE — Preceding unsigned comment added by71.255.184.240 (talk) 21:30, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

I saw you edited my comments on Indiana.

I think a lot of people are going to this website to look up basic information on the location of Indiana and it is not beneficial for them to have to scroll through tons of information to find it. Please don't delete my addition to the page. It makes it easy for those who are simply looking for basic information about the location of Indiana.

And by the way, why shouldn't be know about exciting places to visit in Indiana. I am from Indiana and I would like to share key places I enjoyed while I was there.

Thank you.

-Nathan — Preceding unsigned comment added by98.224.39.88 (talk) 20:08, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your help to get my additions to Indiana on the page. I'm not sure who this guy is who is saying I'm vandalizing, but I hope you know that is not my purpose. Indiana is my home state and I have much to add about it on the page. I am just trying to learn the proper way to add additional information. I am not attempting to be annoying or vandalizing anything. I hope you understand.

-Nathan

		The Userpage Shield
		Thank you for the revert. Brambleclawx 20:11, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

You recently deleted and then restored the addition of an external link to Septic tank. Your first instinct to delete was, I believe, absolutely correct - it is just another commercial link for a local supplier and emptying service in Canada. Nothing more. Regards  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   21:58, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for helping destroy Mark Zito! You're a real team player friend!

TheRealZito (talk) 22:41, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Sry about the comment on AGT Season 8. My little sister typed it when I walked away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by98.118.245.196 (talk) 23:54, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Are you his protector? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.124.200 (talk) 21:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

The stuff I put the last time was an actual real edit, and it should not have been deleted. If you'd bother to check to see, you'd find that the stuff I wrote was true. — Precedingunsigned comment added by 24.222.184.48 (talk) 22:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Belated, but thanks for revert on page "Michael Eric Dyson" on 09Jul2013. Brownwn (talk) 17:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	The only editor who can revert vandals faster than you is Cluebot, and even Cluebot has to work to keep up with you! Howicus (talk) 21:27, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry about the recent changes to it's a small world. I thought that only I could view the changes. But in my defense, the ride IS pretty creepy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.208.197.218 (talk) 22:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, the truth is that I am no new in this, because I actually write in Spanish. You can see it on my user page on Spanish Wikipedia (http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:AdriTM). What I wanted was to translate the article into English of "The Mother" of HIMYM. So if I made a mistake, next time I'll go more carefully. Thanks for your help. — Precedingunsigned comment added by AdriTM (talk •contribs) 11:35, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

It's not "disruptive", it's classic and awesome. You're welcome. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.186.227.72 (talk) 20:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I've declined your speedy deletion request for this AfC because the original text seems to be in the public domain. Anyhow, the current "article" can't be used for Wikipedia. Regards, De728631 (talk) 23:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Page deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added byCz56w3 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

The population of Jacksonville Florida in 2010 was not 500000000000 Tattoodwaitress (talk) 23:34, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi my edits are accurate, I agree scum wasntnsuitabe so was editing this myself when you undid my edit. Scott has not signed for leeds and its only the 19 th today not 20th as wiki claims. Check Leeds united website or Manchester unites as there is no confirmation

He may sign tomorrow and then the page can change to show he plays for Leeds united but he doesnt today — Preceding unsigned comment added by109.157.160.241 (talk) 21:42, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Lugia,

I have made some changes to the article I submitted like making it more impersonal and adding a couple of the sources. Please tell me if I need to do anything else. My intention is to mostly have a history of this military unit in Wiki but also some current stuff. There is very little on the web at the moment.

Yours Oaks 79.141.32.98 (talk) 13:03, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I'm not sure where the removal of the references and other material started. However the WP:OVERLINKs andWP:INFOBOXFLAG edits were the goal. Thanks for adding the edit summary to draw my attention to that huge error on my part.Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

And please don't shoot me a bunch of links. That's the response I got this morning. NOWHERE is it intuitive to resubmit a piece after making requested changes. Please just tell me how to resubmit. Thanks. Montpine (talk) 00:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsignedcomment added by Montpine (talk • contribs) 00:27, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Lugia2453, I have added some references as you requested. I'm actually making this article on behalf of Troy and he provided the information in the article. Thanks and I hope to hear from you soon. — Precedingunsigned comment added by Joelrichters (talk •contribs) 11:58, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Wasn't my page good enough, please i wanna want to add Manigam to wikipedia. it is good picnic spot, please tell if there is some mistake, i will work on that. thanks
  Rather Junaid.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rather Junaid (talk • contribs) 05:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 

I deleted Bryan Cranston being involved with Man of Steel 2 because it has not been confirmed that he has been cast but just rumour going around. Warner Brothers and Bryan Cranston have not confirmed these rumours — Precedingunsigned comment added by Harrypottr66 (talk •contribs) 02:36, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

hello, indeed i apologize about my done editing in [[Homo erectus]. Try to delete but it was impossible. Ryght now i´m with some friends and we were just playing. I apologize again, have a nice week. Thank you! — Precedingunsigned comment added by 201.103.121.156 (talk) 02:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

"(Undid revision 570732091 by 50.80.50.111 (talk) it's not encyclopedic to say that it's due to bad editors" But it's the truth; as the editors are preventing it. — Precedingunsigned comment added by 50.80.50.111 (talk) 22:28, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry you didn't dig my edit on Alexi Murdoch. I thought it would be useful to put an ironic statement in the entry since he actually sounds EXACTLY like Nick Drake. (At least the one song they were just streaming on Pandora) — Preceding unsigned comment added by24.14.37.195 (talk) 23:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

You might want to take a look at this article again and fix the citations. Thanks. GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:18, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments on Voorhies, Iowa, and moving it to production Wikipedia. I'll continue to edit and grow as an editor. -bill Billschrier (talk) 23:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Where do you live? I live in Seattle (USA). --みんな空の下 (トーク) 21:12, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

• New York City. I've lived there my whole life. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Lugia,

Aside from a brief description about our company, can I include some selected projects as well as the media coverage?

Ronald Lu & Partners (RLP) is a multi-disciplinary architecture and interior design firm, founded in Hong Kong in 1976 by Dr. Ronald Lu. RLP has over 550 staff, with offices in Hong Kong, Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen.

Selected projects:

• Xiqu Centre, West Kowloon Cultural District, Hong Kong
• ZCB, Zero Carbon Building, Hong Kong [first zero carbon building in Hong Kong]
• Academic 3, City University of Hong Kong
• Siu Sai Wan Complex, Hong Kong
• Maggie's Cancer Caring Centre Hong Kong [in collaboration with Gehry Partners]

References :

• RLP is at the Forefront of Green Design - PRC July 2013 http://www.rlphk.com/eng/news-media/news/29/220/rlp-is-at-the-forefront-of-green-design-prc-jul-2013.html
• Success built on teamwork - The Standard June 2013 http://www.rlphk.com/eng/news-media/news/29/218/success-built-on-teamwork-the-standard-jun-2013.html
• Xiqu Centre - PRC December 2012 http://www.rlphk.com/eng/news-media/news/29/189/xiqu-centre-prc-dec-2012.html

RLPhongkong (talk) 06:15, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Lugia2453, I've nominated Under the Lights at the Big House and Under the Lights II, both of which youe moved into the mainspace from Articles for Creation, for discussion. Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 03:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Is Huggle working for you yet? It's still down for me. ///EuroCarGT 02:38, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

• It's working for me now. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi police state lover. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.154.126.18 (talk) 20:32, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

I was just trying to be funny, why you got to spoil the fun — Precedingunsigned comment added by Dempo1398 (talk •contribs) 21:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Lugia, Could you kindly check I have correctly added citations forhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Against_Nature Bookchitchat (talk) 13:46, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, there's a discussion atWikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation#Category:AfC_submissions_by_date.2F11_September_2013 about the big batch of redirects you created yesterday. —rybec23:35, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

The information that was deleted (09/13/13) was done so because it is inaccurate. Please remove it from the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by12.106.186.6 (talk) 13:05, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for looking out for me. WadeSimMiser (talk) 21:38, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I was hoping that maybe you could help me with my Wikipedia page. I've been struggling with it for a long time now and I don't really know how else to improve it. Any suggestions that you have would be greatly appreciated. It's a sandboxed page but you had reviewed it in the past. Let me know what needs to be done if you can't see it right now. Sorry, I'm still really new to Wikipedia and don't always know what to do.

Cheers mate,

Tungsten (Tungstenlightbulb (talk) 15:31, 16 September 2013 (UTC))

Please go back to WP:AFC/R. I was requesting the creation of a redirect for this character, which has zero width. 2001:18E8:2:1020:34BE:9914:31CB:EBF9 (talk) 15:39, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done Thanks for letting me know about that. I've created a redirect for it. Lugia2453 (talk) 15:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome, and thank you. 2001:18E8:2:1020:34BE:9914:31CB:EBF9 (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

You have no authority to change any edits to the NASCAR rules section. Unless you can verify the information stop posting it as fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.40.47.24 (talk • contribs)

Isn't that ironic? Your edits can't be verified either. ZappaOMati 21:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Too bad I just verified it through NASCAR.com. So again, until you can prove what you post - stop changing mine, which IS Sourced!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Theahamay (talk • contribs)

No you didn't. You just put a link to the NASCAR home page. Also, the rules can be read if you possess a copy of the rule book.ZappaOMati 22:49, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

HELLO WIKIPEDIA USER

THIS MESSAGE IS MEANT TO INFORM YOU THAT YOU HAVE BEEN SENDING WARNINGS TO RANDOM USERS

BE NOTIFIED THAT THIS HAS TO STOP OR YOU WILL BE REMOVED FROM WIKIPEDIA

MESSAGE (452627.3847) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.238.148.204 (talk) 22:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Except the warnings are to users who vandalize Wikipedia, and you appear to be one of them. ZappaOMati 22:49, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

You do have a point buddy — Preceding unsignedcomment added by 72.238.148.204 (talk) 03:07, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry about that, my cousin, keenan did that on purpose, don't confuse me with keenan, i think you thought it was me because me and keenan were using the same ip address, sorry about that again.

Thanks, hug0905 — Preceding unsigned comment added by68.112.68.126 (talk) 10:45, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

YOUR WELCOME "DUDE" LOL — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.238.148.204 (talk) 03:08, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

This are private information about a private company. We do not allow you to keep this page with some inexact information . We have the right to delete the page go Aurelia Finance. If you don't agree with us it can go further than just this message. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by109.175.164.66 (talk) 21:44, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Mr 109.175.164.66 -- are you threatening legal action?--Epeefleche (talk) 22:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

You added an alert for Baby Face (toy) to User talk:MEL BIRNKRANT, today, but the file is already gone. What was up with that? If you can restore and allow me to look at it, a number of us are trying to help him contribute (He has probably one of the best collection of old toys that I've ever heard of.)Naraht (talk) 20:45, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

• I'm not an administrator, so I can't help you with this because I can't restore articles. If you want the article to be restored, you should make a request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:52, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks, I got it restored by the admin who did the actual deletion. Turned out to be much more chaotic than expected. The editor in question has a huge old toy collection with a well organized web site about it (and was a Professional Toy Designer). It's been an *interesting* ride helping him. :)Naraht (talk) 21:30, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Equifax is not a constructive organisation, wikipedia seems to be heading that way also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by86.145.51.19 (talk) 21:01, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

It seems to me sensible based on my experience to warn people about disingenuous and what I (albeit not a lawyer) would describe as fraudulent practice of an organisation like Equifax through sites such as wikipedia. I have less than zero interest in initiating any case though the dishonest court systems in England or America, but did think wikipedia could be a productive avenue. Obviously I was misinformed by the mass media. What a surprise! — Precedingunsigned comment added by 86.145.51.19 (talk) 21:12, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

have a nice day. and I am fine with the deletion of the article concerns of the Iphone 5S. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk)FockeWulf FW 190FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) —Precedingundated comment added 17:27, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

I tried to semi-protect his recent targets earlier today. Let me know if you see him hitting any that I missed. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:17, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you; I was at work and just saw what happened this afternoon having to deal with this. I apologize if this all gave you any trouble; the racial taunts and abuse is a new and ugly angle that just came in this weekend. Nate •(chatter) 03:41, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

These are weapons designed to kill lots of people very quickly. This is a factual statement that should be included in the summary. Why do you report this as vandalism??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chemistguy27 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello Lugia2453 - The contents of "Vishnupriya" is completely erroneous. It does not make any sense. If you review the material, you will see for yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added byMasalateaaddict (talk • contribs) 21:54, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Have you read the content on Vishnupriya? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masalateaaddict (talk •contribs) 22:21, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

You know user 78.142.110.252 is refusing to heed warnings. Admins are taking a long time to block the ip. Seems there having fun at watching you revert that IPs vandalism. DDreth[talk to me] 22:49, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Here!

Bacca123 (talk) 14:33, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello Lugia2453 May I ask why you reverted the information I uploaded for the retractable awning search term to the prior version? All the information I have provided is factual in nature and will help the public when searching for info. on awnings and retractable awnings I would like to add even more information to help those researching online. All I want to do is help and you are not allowing me to do so :( I have 27 years experience Retractableawningsdotcom — Preceding unsigned comment added byRetractableawningsdotcom (talk •contribs) 20:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Lugia, I understand your actions, no offense taken, thanks for the note. Live Long n Prosper in Health n Happiness, Glenn Ryerson — Precedingunsigned comment added by 75.97.193.27 (talk) 03:42, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

what — Preceding unsigned comment added by72.27.138.75 (talk) 22:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

I checked in my social studies textbook and you forgot to put things that a house supplies for us, like providing us storage for bathrooms, goods, water, heat, etc. WHAT'S YOUR PROBLEM! I WAS ONLY TRYING TO HELP!!!!! You kindof hurt my feelings back there... but, this is a public computer, so maybe someone else changed it... sorry for whoever that was... but can you just dd that to the article "HOUSE"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.251.42.252 (talk) 22:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

I proved my point, i'm glad you deleted my post. I was actually going in to do it myself...after of course taking a print screen. Universities shouldn't be using Wikipedia in class because anyone can add to it and anyone can take it away. It's not a scholarly source and i lost respect for my professor and the university for allowing him to use that as a source. Ridiculous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by71.22.14.7 (talk) 22:42, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Luigi: Re: swastikas in Salzwedel, here is the link from the German Spiegel news web site: ^[1] -- James — Preceding unsigned comment added by75.51.169.125 (talk) 22:58, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

My article on Kyam Livingston was rejected because it allegedly speaks about a single incident. There were three demonstrations in addition to her death mentioned in the article, and two incidents similar to hers are referenced in the article. I also note that there are Wikipedia articles about the deaths of Kimani Gray, Sean Bell, Amadou Diallo, Trayvon Martin, Anthony Baez, Briana Ojeda, etc. Although it may not be a story of national attention (yet), it is widely known in the NYC tri-state area and it had more credible citations in it than a couple of the other stories mentioned above which were accepted. Please explain why these articles were acceptable and notable while Kyam's story was not. I am genuinely interested in knowing how to improve the article, as I feel this is a story that needs to be preserved.

Thank you. S /DayannM — Preceding unsigned comment added by24.90.191.45 (talk) 22:29, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I apologize for inadvertently undoing your useful additions/edits as I was trying to remove another person's vandalism. For some reason this text was showing when I got on the page: "Topher is the selfie master and all women bow down to him and his selfies. won best combover 13 years running" yet I was not able to remove it in the edit view, so I tried reverting to a previous version. Anyway, it's fixed now and that's what matters. Cheers, Justin — Preceding unsigned comment added by199.212.95.28 (talk) 00:04, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

I believe my comments on the french and Indian War was spot on accurate. My comment was in no way incorrect, or racist. Ok it was a little racist and i apoligize. If you would take out the racism in my comment i bieleve you could repost my comment. Immediantly! — Preceding unsigned comment added by96.2.4.126 (talk) 00:20, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

im sorry but i wanted to impress someone and i got carried away — Precedingunsigned comment added by Kspraggins (talk •contribs) 20:53, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Naw is cool dawg, sry. Thought that were them facts.You'ne (talk) 19:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

I left the True Cross evangelical a deep and meaningful message that might get through. Amandajm (talk) 06:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

For your work against vandalism on Huggle today. Keep up the good work!Oddbodz (talk) 20:35, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

The review from Think progress is biased and does not belong on the page. Think progress is a biased far left wing site, the book written about the murder is 100% accurate with no agenda, as the author is gay himself. Rosemberg's review is biased, not credible and she did not even read the book. If you put it back, I will take it away, and do it over and over and over and over and over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by67.86.237.61 (talk) 21:01, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Threats to engage in edit warring are often met with the suspension of editing privileges.--Mr Fink (talk) 21:41, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I just wanted to say that I wanted to change the photo in Barbie (film series)...and also, I believe it's time to change the Page into Barbie Entertainment since this is the term that Mattel used in Barbie movies. And, I'm the one who actually started and created this page in 2008...so thanks...pls understand...

James^x12345 20:55, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Your RfA looks as if it should be clear cut. You;re a decent editor who has the wit to see when mistakes have been made, to learn from them and to correct them. It interests me how the oppose people write long essays and the support people simply support.

I have found that the status of not being an admin is far more useful than actually having the mop and bucket. I see and understand that you would like to be an admin, and there is a strong probability that you will become one, this time, next time or some time. But the elevation process is pretty tough. Fiddle Faddle 18:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

James^x12345 21:35, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for help in improving article. Luckydhaliwal (talk) 23:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Pls tell how to make Bot generated title. I want for Asif Azim. Luckydhaliwal (talk) 09:46, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

I made sme changes, now that I understand what was wanted! please look it over for me==== — Preceding unsigned comment added by69.120.174.120 (talk) 17:51, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for reviewing the article we submitted at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Trackit.

I'm at a loss as to how to proceed, we added a reference to something relevant we had done with a client, however it did not specifically mentioned Trackit, therefore it was declined. Now, after removing that reference it has been declined due to references?

This issue we have is that companies are looking for us and finding an alternative company with the same namehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrackIT_Solutions, and because of the impact of Wikipedia on the web it's causing confusion.

We are extremely well known in our field, yet because we don't have random site references the article is being rejected?

Any help you can offer would be great.

Thanks

Mjpfx (talk) 08:18, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Yesterday you rejected an article I've been trying to get posted for Richardson Electronics for several weeks (I'm freelancing for them). I've received proper approval from their legal department to use content from their website to build this article. The most common reason for the rejection has been a lack of notable sources. Unfortunately, the company's website is all I really have to go on to build this page. I think it is very similar to the page of NEC Display Solutions (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEC_Display_Solutions), which also does not cite any sources, so I'm not sure why mine continues to be rejected. Should I submit it as a "stub" like NEC did? If so, how do you recommend I go about doing that?

Yesterday you rejected an article I've been trying to get posted for Richardson Electronics for several weeks (I'm freelancing for them). I've received proper approval from their legal department to use content from their website to build this article. The most common reason for the rejection has been a lack of notable sources. Unfortunately, the company's website is all I really have to go on to build this page. I think it is very similar to the page of NEC Display Solutions (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEC_Display_Solutions), which also does not cite any sources, so I'm not sure why mine continues to be rejected. Should I submit it as a "stub" like NEC did? If so, how do you recommend I go about doing that? Kmb3333 (talk) 16:17, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

I would like to re-submit this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Groovestreet#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Cedar_Hill_Church_and_Cemetaries_.28October_29.29

Thank You, Scott Taylor — Preceding unsigned comment added byGroovestreet (talk • contribs) 18:59, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Lugia2453

Thanks again for your comments. I'm still struggling to understand what our next steps should be.

You state benefit to Wikipedia, however currently Wikipedia is not benefiting by distinguishing between the two companies? It allows the submission of one company, which I note has no other references other than their own product set, and not ours, therefore you're dictating who people should and shouldn't know about? Can we contest that the other article is on there as according the rules I keep being directed too, they size up about the same as us?

We are a 4 year old company working globally who work in a technology space which is particularly secretive and private about what tools it uses. Therefore, we don't really walk about what we do other than to clients. This does not make us less notable, simply because we have no references on other websites?

Fundamentally, people want to know who we are and mistaking us for another company who are on Wikipedia. I would rather not have to make the article, but because the other is there we are having to as people (rightly or wrongly) use Wikipedia as a primary source of information and currently it is misleading.

Thanks again for your help with this, I'm not trying to be argumentative, but I really fail to see why wikipedia doesn't benefit from acknowledging our company whereas is happy to acknowledge one of the same name?

Mjpfx (talk) 12:34, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I received a message on my talkpage coming from the artist V V Brown (that what it said, at least). It said that she was frustrated that there was supposedly incorrect information on the page. I think this is the editor that suddenly blanked a section that we both had to undo. I'm not sure if I believe her, but can you tell me what you think? Thanks. The Triple M (talk) 20:04, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

• I'm not quite sure here either. It would be hard to confirm this through just the IP address. I had reverted the edit because it removed a sourced section without explanation. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:07, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
• She was making constructive edits previously. Perhaps she could have done it to cover up the deletion? That could be the case.The Triple M (talk) 20:11, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

--Jeffrd10 (talk) 20:01, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Hey hows it going? I am a university student and Ive carried out a bit of research on;

"Future Planning for elderly carers with a child with learning disabilities".

I am new to Wikipedia and have been looking through various articles on wikipedia relating to Learning disabilities. I thought the article I would like to publish on Wikipedia would be best suited to being a redirect from the Learning disability page. You have stated you thought it would be better as a new article. What you you recommend on helping to do this?

I thought my article would have more chance of being published as a redirect from the Learning Disability page as more people would read it as a redirect. Ive a notable article wrote with good references from different books and research groups. I feel it will be a very worthy article to get published on Wikipedia. Would you recommend when creating a new article a title called 'Future Planning' or the longer title that I have outlined above?

Any help will be very much appreciated as im new to Wikipedia and this is my first article.

Uniulstgrad (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2013 (UTC) Ian

Hey Hows it going? I still think that a redirect would be best suited to this article as it is closely linked to Learning Disability. Ive taken your advice and have came up with 2 titles now which I could use ;

"Learning Disability Future Care" or "Planning Future Care For Adults With A Learning Disability"

I would like your expertise to ensure my article overcomes this first hurdle of getting accepted as a redirect. Your help would be greatly appreciated.

Uniulstgrad (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC) Ian

Hi Lugia, there is a bureaucrat discussion ongoing noe about your RfA. JianhuiMobile ^talk 15:19, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

...including a bureaucrat suggestion that your Rfa be "redone" from scratch. Jusdafax 03:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

• Lugia2453, thank you for offering to serve the community in a greater capacity as administrator. I've reviewedyour RFA and thebureaucrat discussion and regret to inform you that there is not sufficient consensus at this time to grant the administrative tools. I would urge you not to be dissuaded by this outcome, but to take into account the concerns noted and submit a new request at a future time. Best regards, –xeno^talk 16:53, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Lugia. Just thought I'll stop by and give you a quiet commendation note on the calm and nuanced way in which you have carried yourself through the past few days. Irrespective of whether your RfA passes (to which I shall applaud) or doesn't (to which I shall offer you my nom-statement in case you stand again), this is my small note of support to your deportment. Ask me for any assistance you might wish in the future. Best regards. Wifione ^Message 04:19, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

I would like to second what Wifione said. I imagine this has been stressful, and I hope that it will be resolved in a positive manner. And Adoil Descended (talk) 13:08, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Who are you? And what gives you the idea that you should restore grammatical mistakes when someone who knows better has taken the time to correct them? Who is your supervisor? — Precedingunsigned comment added by 71.226.133.46 (talk) 06:55, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

• Here. Regards. Wifione ^Message 16:42, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

I don't know how you feel about your RFA being closed with no consensus, but I think you can take that there is a lot of support for you at some point in the near future. After a little diversity in editing and a few more months of tenure there will be people queuing to nominate you again. It's annoying it didn't happen this time, but I wouldn't be too disappointed.James^x12345 17:23, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Pile on sympathies from me. It could have gone either way. Don't get too discouraged. I encourage you to explore WP:3O, if it's something you are interested in. It's a good way to get exposed to the kind of everyday content disputes that many RfA voters want to see how you handle. You don't even need to offer third opinions at first, take it slow and get familiar with the sort of content disputes that happen every day here. Many of them seem silly or petty, but to the people involved, they are highly important, always remember that. Gigs (talk) 16:25, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Hey Hows it going?

I was just wondering if you have had time to look at my 2 redirects? I put 2 redirects in on the 4th and they havnt had an answer whether they have been accepted or declined as yet. I noticed a few redirects created after my requests have been answered, these were on the 5th, so i was wondering when I would find out the answer to mine?

I also edited my first 'Talk' message with you asking for further information but there hasn't been a response to this either. I have put this below so you can see it. Im new to wikipedia and I am not 100% sure how this all works. Im not sure whether I had to create a new 'talk' message to ask you a question or could simply edit the way I have done the previous message.

Your help is very much appreciated and I await your response.

Uniulstgrad (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2013 (UTC) Ian

Hey Hows it going? I still think that a redirect would be best suited to this article as it is closely linked to Learning Disability. Ive taken your advice and have came up with 2 titles now which I could use ;

"Learning Disability Future Care" or "Planning Future Care For Adults With A Learning Disability"

I would like your expertise to ensure my article overcomes this first hurdle of getting accepted as a redirect. Your help would be greatly appreciated.

Uniulstgrad (talk) 11:02, 6 November 2013 (UTC) Ian

After some thought, I ended up declining your two redirect suggestions. They just don't seem like common search terms that many people would use. See the sections for your redirects in Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects for more information as to why I declined them. Lugia2453 (talk) 16:25, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Hey Lugia2453

Just another note; we have 2 suggested titles for our redirect but of which you have declined and have asked for sources. I have enclosed the sources below and the 2 title I have in mind are the 2 used in the redirects;

1 Learning Disability Future Care 2 Planning Future Care for adults With A Learning Disability

Please confirm which one will accept as a redirect now that I have listed my notable sources. My article I feel is best suited to being a redirect rather than a new article

Regards Ian

Thank you for your reply and your advice. I have taken your advice about providing some reliable sources. This topic has been researched at University lecturer level and academically via sage publications and other academic publishers. This topic has become an important issue in the learning disability field.

As requested, please see a list of reliable sources here below.

1) Taggart L, Truesdale-Kennedy M, Ryan A, McConkey R.(2012) Journal of intellectual disabilities: examining the support needs of aging family carers in developing future plans for a relative with an intellectual disability.

2) Heller T, Caldwell J and Factor A (2005) Supporting Aging Caregivers and Adults with Developmental Disabilities and Future Planning. Rehabilitation Research and Training Centre on Aging with a Developmental Disability

3) The Housing Timebomb. www.mencap.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/housing%20timebomb.pdf

4) www.mencap.org.uk/what-we-do/wills-and-trusts/guide-wills-and-trusts

I have copied some of our message history and redirect request history here below for your convenience.

Now that I have provided the reliable sources, can you please confirm that I can now proceed with my redirect?

Thanking you once again for your time. Ian

Redirect request: Planning Future Care For Adults With A Learning Disability [hide] This request has been declined. Please do not modify it.

Target of redirect: Learning Disability

Reason: Too add value to an existing article. I have searched the existing article and other Wikipedia entries and cannot find any information on Future Planning for Elderly Carers of people with a Learning disability

Source (if applicable): http://jid.sagepub.com/content/16/3/217 Journal Of Intellectual Disabilities (2012) "Examining the support needs of ageing family carers in developing future plans for a relative with an intellectual disability"

Uniulstgrad (talk) 20:25, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

   Symbol declined.svg Declined. The title you suggested seems like an unlikely search term. Could you provide reliable sources showing that it is a common term? Lugia2453 (talk) 16:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 

Uniulstgrad (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2013 (UTC) Ian

Hey Hows it going? I still think that a redirect would be best suited to this article as it is closely linked to Learning Disability. Ive taken your advice and have came up with 2 titles now which I could use ;

"Learning Disability Future Care" or "Planning Future Care For Adults With A Learning Disability"

I would like your expertise to ensure my article overcomes this first hurdle of getting accepted as a redirect. Your help would be greatly appreciated.

Uniulstgrad (talk) 11:02, 6 November 2013 (UTC) Ian

   After some thought, I ended up declining your two redirect suggestions. They just don't seem like common search terms that many people would use. See the sections for your redirects in Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects for more information as to why I declined them. Lugia2453 (talk) 16:25, 6 November 2013 (UTC) 

Uniulstgrad (talk) 17:21, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Ian

Lugia, remember that thing that you denying that redirect to the NYC Marathon page using TCS New York City Marathon. Let me tell you. What you said is not true. I am purely asking to make a redirect, NOT A NEW PAGE. Can you really please try to allow users to direct them to the NYC Marathon's wiki page is they type "TCS New York City Marathon". Again, I'm not requesting you to putTCS New York City Marathon as a redirect to the New York City Marathon. It's still the same Marathon, but with a different name when it comes to it's sponsorship. Please reply if you can. 20chances(Talk) 6:21 PM, November 6, 2013 (UTC)

• I know that you weren't trying to create a new page, and that wasn't what I intended to say. What I was saying was that what you were asking for was not a redirect request, but what appeared to be a general statement about the new name. That, to me, appeared to be something that was intended for the article's talk page rather than a page to request new redirects. Besides, the title of the redirect you were requesting and the title of the target were the same, so that's why I declined it. If your redirect title had been "TCS New York City Marathon", I would have accepted your request, and I mentioned that in my decline reason. For the record, I've now created "TCS New York City Marathon" as a redirect. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:11, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stuart O'Keeffe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Talk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Good Afternoon Lugia

I have submitted another redirect for our article and have enclosed this information below. I have sent you a couple of messages and am awaiting a reply regarding my article. I nhave enclosed the relevant sources you asked for, along with a bit more information on the reason for our article.

Please can you reply at your earliest available opportunity;

(Copy of the Redirect Request) Target of redirect: Learning Disability

Reason: To add value to the existing article. I have searched the existing article and other Wikipedia entries and cannot find any information on the future care for people with a learning disablity. Due to the unique nature of topic, future planning/care for adults with a learning disability, it is important that it is linked to the main 'learning disability' page. The consequences of not doing so will mean few people will not know what to search for, to source such information. There has been limited research on this matter to date as such 'planning' was not required ie people with a learning disability did not out live their parents. Demographics are different today, hence, the need to educate people (elderly carers) about 'future planning' to avoid a crisis situation.

This is the reason as to why our article would be best suited to being a redirect.

Source (if applicable): http://jid.sagepub.com/content/16/3/217 Journal Of Intellectual Disablities (2012): "Examing the support needs of ageing family carers in developing future plans for a relative with an intellectual disability".

Reliable sources used; 1) Taggart L, Truesdale-Kennedy M, Ryan A, McConkey R.(2012) Journal of intellectual disabilities: examining the support needs of aging family carers in developing future plans for a relative with an intellectual disability. 2) Heller T, Caldwell J and Factor A (2005) Supporting Aging Caregivers and Adults with Developmental Disabilities and Future Planning. Rehabilitation Research and Training Centre on Aging with a Developmental Disability 3) The Housing Timebomb. www.mencap.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/housing%20timebomb.pdf 4) www.mencap.org.uk/what-we-do/wills-and-trusts/guide-wills-and-trusts 5) Journal from Sage (acadmeic publisher)

Uniulstgrad (talk) 12:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC) Ian

The redirect is wrong because Podblanc is web site whereas Keith Luke is a neonazi in jail. What I can do is creating an article for Keith Luke instead.--Charrua85 (talk) 22:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Lugia2453. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6