User talk:Lugia2453

I'm WritingEnthusiast14 from wikiHow (I'm sure you know about me). I've decided to come over to Wikipedia and start editing here, too. I don't have access to the rollback tool that I'm used to on wikiHow, so I can't figure out how to efficiently patrol and revert pages. Any suggestions? WritingEnthusiast14 (talk) 21:03, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• For now, using Twinkle is the best way of reverting edits. If you want something faster, you can also install the Lupin tool, which assists in fighting vandalism. After you've been on for a few months and shown that you're capable of reverting edits and doing it well, you can request rollback, which also gets you access to the Huggle tool. As for patrolling, you'll want to see the Wikipedia:Patrols page, since there multiple ways of doing patrolling here. Lugia2453 (talk) 14:28, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see. I've already set up Twinkle (I'm liking it, actually). I might try out Lupin sometime soon. Thanks for the help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WritingEnthusiast14 (talk • contribs) 15:06, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When You Get Rollback rights, Id also Recommend Stiki, Which automatically feeds info from CluebotNG edits that possibly could be Vandalism. Happy_Attack_Dog (Throw Me a Bone) 19:36, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just sick of people who revert good edits without giving proper announcement first. I hope you understand — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.81.84.247 (talk) 16:37, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2.85.225.108 has removed content here. I'll let you deal with the user. Kingjeff (talk) 16:50, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

im so sory i dont know how to talk to u i will stop — Preceding unsigned comment added by LOLjaiman78 (talk • contribs)

My edit was ok because there really are 2,500 cockroaches enrolled in the school. Please don't revert my edit if I go there and you don't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francismcgvrn (talk • contribs)

have you used the new wikimedia image viewer? do you like it?

it doesn't seem constructive to me to replace a very good image viewer with a very bad one. so please see to it that this non-constructive change is reverted also.

thanks

67.175.146.68 (talk) 15:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hi I Pandit Sukhdev want to know how can I remove user from my name in Wikipedia page please help me I also sumited all my links to know more about me I am a musician from india and want to load some information about me thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.240.48.194 (talk • contribs)

I was just warning people to not 100% trust this in case they are doing homework so I demand it to be reput up there. Thank you for reading what I have to say. :P — Preceding unsigned comment added by Someone9901 (talk • contribs) 16:19, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you delete information on a coach? That page is about his coaching career. Your deletion is completely subjective. I played for Coach White for four years and he deserves to have his career documented.

Hello Lugia2453. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).[reply]

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey you marked this edit of mine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghulam_Ishaq_Khan_Institute_of_Engineering_Sciences_and_Technology?diff=541056243 as spam, which is incorrect. This section was about notable alumni and it should contain prominent figures who have contributed in any way and have made a name for Institute. Let me know the reason for this otherwise this diff may kindly be acknowledged. Me.hassan91 (talk) 13:43, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have unedited my last amendments on Ja'afar Touqan page, pls see hereunder the explanation of required amendments :

In 1938, when Ja'afar Touqan was born, the state of Israel did not exist and as such, this information stated here by Google is incorrect statement about his place of birth it should be changed to Jerusalem, Palestine.

Appreciate your prompt feedback.

regards

	ABK AWARD
	HEY, I DID IT! Marchella abkcosmetics (talk) 17:12, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lugia, You might recognize this username from wikiHow. I'm Byankno1 (as you could probably tell from the same username).

A few years ago, before I started my wikiHow account. I was really stupid on this site. I seriously gave my complete first, middle initial and last name of myself, my parents, brothers and even grandmother (which I later deleted) on my User page here, along with our occupations at the time. From reading books about Wikipedia and watching edits get cleared off of other pages due to other reasons (so they can't even be seen in the history), I was wondering if both that edit and any edit that could have involved this issue being seen in the preview could be completely removed from the history of my User page here. From reading the forums post on wikiHow where you said that you had more rights than most others, would it be possible for you to help me remove these few edits so they aren't seen by others in the History list? It's been quite too long, and I'm afraid other people will have potentially seen this by now. I've cleared them away, but the diffs still are shown. Please, please, please. If you can't, please pass this request on to others who can, please, please, please. The page that references the removal is shown here and the link that shows the addition is here. There are about 10-12 edits in between these two diffs. Please remove them from the history page, so none of these edits show — Preceding unsigned comment added by Byankno1 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm sorry, but since I'm not an admin here as I am on wikiHow, I can't do so. I'll make a request to an admin momentarily. Thanks for letting me know about this on wikiHow, since I'm more active there. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:31, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  @Byankno1: I've deleted the page. LFaraone 21:57, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm just letting you know lugia that I will monitor Eufaula's notable people, and please stop editing the section. I've undid your edit about 6000000 times. Thanks Olliebum09 (talk) 03:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you do that Lugia? --186.6.192.59 (talk) 17:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Madam C. J. Walker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I was trying to revert the article to its last good revision, per my edit summary, not vandalize it. It looks as though the article went through a heavy amount of vandalism, so I was trying to find a good revision to revert back to. Apparently, the one I reverted to wasn't this - I was trying to change it back to a more appropriate revision before your revert. I understand why you reverted it, but this warning didn't seem necessary, IMO. A level 2 warning is also pretty high for this one-time case. It's better to start with a level 1 warning and work your way up if vandalism by the user persists, as I do. Lugia2453 (talk) 16:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, apologies.... I shouldn't have templated you. I guess you misunderstood what the correct version was. I've now reverted it to an earlier version, before the latest round of vandalism started. Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Brenda and Erik were debating nasal obstruction, and no one else in the world cares about this topic.. I needed to personalize the article to their disagreement. Please see Wikipedia Terms and Conditions re: personalization of articles. Everyone is allowed to personalize 3 articles per 6 months. I will leave the page alone as they have already seen the edit. Thanks for your interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.164.85 (talk) 16:01, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. You recently warned 167.102.87.10 about vandalism. This editor has 2 POV edits @ Denis Tsargush using this address, and, very probably, several others using several 1Vp6 addresses. If you have blocking rights, could you please block this address and the most recent 1Vp6 address. If it persists could you block the other 1Vp6 addresses. The user only seems to use each one time. Clever, persistent, annoying. Thanks and regards. Tapered (talk) 02:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Civil War, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Isthisuseful (talk) 22:29, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Lugia2453, I just clicked onto yr notice that u'd outed an edit of mine about the Metropolitan Railway. The article said that the Metro Railway connected to Euston Station. This is not so, nor has it ever been. I removed this lie; which has been restored.

The London & Birmingham Railway stopped north of Euston Square, the Metropolitan Railway ran beneath the main road to the south of Euston Square, and nor was any tube station built then or now that's near to Euston Station. It is a very major nuisance to passengers travelling from or to the Northwest and continuing from/to the east, the south, or southwest ..... either they must lug their luggage to/from Euston Square Tube Station, or use a taxi, or wander the tunnels of the Underground to find a tube train for them which will connect to the Metropolitan Railway or other tube line that they are searching for. The ease of connexion to the tube from the mainline stations at Farringdon Road, King's Cross/St Pancras, Marylebone, and even Paddington continues to shame the builders of the Metropolitan Railway regarding Euston.... the nearest station of the Metropolitan Railway is Euston Square; which is half a kilometre in the open air.

Of note is that the cut-and-cover build of the Metropolitan Railway neither shifted north of the Euston Road to be beneath or to the north of Euston Square; and that the Metropolian Railway chose to site its nearest station to Euston Station not at their railway's nearest point to Euston Station [a matter of < 100 yards], but > 400 yards away.

It seemed to me, and still does, that this needs to be noticed. Not least to tell present-day travellers of the ghastliness that will greet them as they search in vain for an integrated transport hub locked into the majorest railway terminus in London that connects to Birmingham, Wolverhampton, Coventry, Stoke-on-Trent, Liverpool, Manchester, Chester, Holyhead and the Irish ferries, Preston, Carlisle, Barrow-in-Furness, and Glasgow.

I'd be obliged to u to restore my edited items. Thanx. 82.69.73.5 (talk) 13:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Lugia2453 I think you incorrectly reverted one of my posts. if you think that the information was inaccurate please msg me but i dont think you have a full in depth understanding of what i input as if you did you would not have undone my edit and or if you removed it due to incorrect punctuation please feel free to fix it thanks— Preceding unsigned comment added by I know dbz (talk • contribs)

• It was unsourced and possibly original research. In addition, it contained unencyclopedic statements. For instance, saying that someone had their butt kicked by somebody, as you did in your 3rd paragraph, is not appropriate for a Wikipedia article. Lugia2453 (talk) 16:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to invite everyone to join the WikiProject R&B and Soul Music. We are currently on demand for new members, the project was dying, but with your help we can revive it and make it one of the best WikiProjects. Make me sure that you'll think about this and remember cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards Dfrr (talk) 06:14, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hello, yes i fail to see how my contribution was not constructive, it was not offensive or insightful, and i think you will find the person in question would actually condone it, regards.

Yup, just a pokemon's name and a set of 4 numbers, like mine. :) ―Pikachu2568 ^pika! 11:39, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have messaged me sometime ago . why you are showing speedy deletion on my page ?

what is wrong in Hamlok Galaxy ( We are that What you think ) page ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hgboyregun (talk • contribs) 14:52, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lugia 2453!!!!11! Why u delete my masterpierce title of national treashure??? Nickolas cage really do make million dollors off the constituion! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.104.140.59 (talk) 15:21, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "James Richardson Corporation".The discussion is about the topic James Richardson Corporation. Thank you. AnotherNewAccount (talk) 11:30, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there no Wikipedia for my best friend Brandon?

Hello, Lugia2453. You have new messages at 121.217.39.36's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

who r u — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.206.99.3 (talk) 16:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So, basicly, u are so dull, so day-school stupid that u are unable to cope with even the slightest correction to yr incapacity. doh doh doh. The fact of the matter is, as said at start, that Euston Railway Station is still, as it has ever been, OUT of the interlinkage between railway termini in London: the GC @ GC @ Marylebone, GWR @ Paddington, the LSWR @ Waterloo, the SEC at Charing Cross, the LBCS @ Victoria, the EC @ Farringdon Road, the GE @ Liverpool Street, the GN @ King's Cross. & the Midland @ St Pancras. On the record as Gary Sunbeam, [u know my name, so see me in court] may yr holiday luggage be sold in Mumbai for the next 2200 years. I insult u so that the people may win. The sovereign people and tourists need to KNOW that Euston is an island within the metropolitan space; although it is not a part of it. A kinda Alcatraz.

From the historical viewpoint, Why???? did this happen?..... As said before Was it FREEMASONS?. U do not dare to ask. Whose money separated Euston from everywhere else?. U are American. George Washington was a Freemason. Freemasons opposed freeing slaves. What do U say about slavery?. I look u in the eye when I say this, American.... Where do u stand on freeing Afro-Americans from slavery?. Leave alone freeing the wage-slaves of England from the trek between Euston & Euston Square. As a Jew, I stand with Afro-Americans, and oppose slavery: unto flagellation, unto blindness, unto death. What do u do? ..... in naming wage-slavery?..... pretend that u're on holiday. I curse u personally, 'though I do not know yr name.... these facts must be made known, or I'll get someone to kneecap u. Assume that I don't mean it, and know that the web says that I've only got a 7% chance of being dead in 5 years' time. Am I an extremist?. Was Buddha?. Was Jesus?. Was God?. Was Mohammed?. Surely u can be truthful on railway termini, when praying to any of them?.... but not when being turned into manure by Hitler nor Stalin?. Well, now; let's have a nice cup of tea. And get the sugar-lumps right, like the London termini. If u don't mind too much; pretty please. {that's a thing about us Brits, we understand politeness... we only burned down the White House AFTER war had been declared.} — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.73.5 (talk) 11:10, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Lugia, I took the contents as presented and was only too enthusiastic. The banks rich history and track record speak for itself but all good things come to an end. End of a good era. Thanks for the opportunity to rebut. Jan Wynter/Jhtan Tours/http://jhtan.yolasite.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jan wynter (talk • contribs) 21:05, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GreenFacts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GreenFacts_(2nd_nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jacques de Selliers (talk) 01:00, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Just introducing a familiar 'face' -I'm User:Adelaide from wikiHow. Please do feel free to call me Adelaide when we're communicating on Wikipedia, too! I'm not that active here, much more on wikiHow, so not sure how much you'll 'see' me here. I just come in here to check sometimes, but yeah... I do plan on being (a little, I guess!) more active here. Anyway, just wanted to say hi to a familiar face! I've been here way, way longer than I have on wikiHow, but I'm just now learning some constructive ways to contribute. So you're the Wikipedia expert...! :) -- Do you have any tips for how to start contributing constructively? EmilyREditor (talk) 06:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey there Adelaide! I'm not as active here as I am on wikiHow, but I still come here pretty often. My advice is to read Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia, which explains different ways that you can contribute to Wikipedia. There are also many WikiProjects that you can join, if you have an interest in a particular subject. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:54, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Projects are awesome! I considered joining one back awhile ago but I haven't yet, because I was so inactive, haha! That article on contributing is a great idea too, for ways to contribute. Thanks for the advice! EmilyREditor (talk) 23:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh, and I do plan on coming here more often while still being on wikiHow a lot - that will be nice! EmilyREditor (talk) 23:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry but I have to say bye to Wikipedia. I have too many commitments to contribute here and I personally like the community at wikiHow better, best wishes. EmilyREditor (talk) 20:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree, many thanks for spotting it - I didn't notice the rubbish. An old keyboard, now replaced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.25.135.50 (talk) 17:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lugia2453, I am Qi Wu, a computer science MS student at the University of Minnesota - Twin Cities. Currently, we are working on a project studying the main article and sub article relationship in a purpose of better serving the Wikipedia article structure. It would be appreciated if you could take 4-5 minutes to finish the survey questions. Thanks in advance! We will not collect any of your personally information.

Thank you for your time to participate this survey. Your response is important for us!

https://umn.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_bvm2A1lvzYfJN9H

Here is the link to our Meta:Research page. Feel free to sign up if you want to know the results! https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Main/sub-article_relationship

Wuqi333444 (talk) 01:44, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mann Vasanai (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mann Vasanai (TV series) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 13:28, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lugia2453. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lugia2453! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 19:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "like twenty impossibles". Since you had some involvement with the "like twenty impossibles" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 22:59, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Interior department. Since you had some involvement with the Interior department redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 09:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect "Gwenda Hawkes". The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 26#"Gwenda Hawkes" until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hi , DGG said the article has been restored for editing but i can tsee the link .

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Star Trek 13 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 2#Star Trek 13 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MightyArms (talk) 19:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Foreign Secretaries has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 17 § Foreign Secretaries until a consensus is reached. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 21:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]