User talk:BrothaTimothy

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following: Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page. Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end. Please specify a descriptive subject or headline for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed. Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply. ⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grammy nominations for Janet Jackson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grammy nominations for Janet Jackson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 15:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey BrothaTimothy, check this IMDb site out!

• Sexual Healing at IMDb

Best, --Discographer (talk) 20:44, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you mean about not including it in the aricle, kind of like when we included Blondie: The Florence Ballard Story in her article, and no movie on that ever did get made! Also, both of these films had original casted leads who both dropped out. Best, --Discographer (talk) 20:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Best, --Discographer (talk) 00:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The information I gave for the album was correct, otherwise I wouldn't have put it. He did have seven number ones for that album. Five in the US, two in other countries. If you want to find out for yourself, check out MJ's singles charts to find out for yourself.Stco23 (talk) 18:00, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I checked to see why you changed it. I guess it's fine. The reason for that was I changed it from six to seven because somebody put six and that person could have done it because he/she saw a number one for one of the songs in another country and decided to change it as a result.Stco23 (talk) 18:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Moonglows.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:The Moonglows.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hammersoft (talk) 15:09, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know whether you've seen this thread- WP:RD/E#Enotris Johnson (+ Little Richard). Anything you can add? Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No I haven't. Quite interesting. I'll put in my two cents, thanks. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 14:46, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Holidays!
	Hi, BrothaTimothy! Have a happy and safe season, and a blessed new year! Holiday cheers, --Discographer (talk) 00:28, 25 December 2013 (UTC) [reply]

My name is Marg...Please contact me by email. I am new to wiki...want to do an article. Would like for YOU to mentor me. And also wish to communicate with you re your article on Harris Womack (I was a VERY close "friend" of his who loved him dearly). My email: poekneegurl@aol.com At your convenience and discretion...I leave the timing in your hands and really wish for your serious consideration in regards to mentoring/training me. Warmest regards, Marg March 9th 2014 "99.167.80.8 (talk) 14:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)"[reply]

You mean when it comes to how to make a Wikipedia article or editing? Sure. I'll send you a message. No prob. Cool you were friends with Harry Womack. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 16:10, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BrothaTimothy I am not in a hurry and I know you have life outside of here. But when you can manage as far as mentoring me - let me know and I will jump at the opportunity. I will check back here every other day to see if you are able. If you will, will you give me a few dates where you may be available to communicate or when you have the time email me: poekneegurl@aol.com. I am trying to do an article on another friend of mine who is also a bass player, is still alive and I want to honor him. Atleast start on the article so others who are knowledgeable will also post. Hope you are well. Thank you for your time.

poekneegurl (Poekneegurl (talk) 11:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Poekneegurl (talk) 11:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sure will, just message me here and I'll tell you how. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 19:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey BrothaTimothy, I agree. The other day, WikiProject The Supremes was tagged as being "inactive". I thought, "that's okay, why not just have a Motown WikiProject which would cover not just only one artist, but all of them!" This way, the Motown WP will have an ongoing lifespan since it could also deal with not only its artists (The Supremes, Four Tops, Vandellas, Miracles, Marvin Gaye, etc.), but also its record labels (Motown, Gordy, Tamla, etc.), families (Gordy, Gaye, Jackson, DeBarge, etc.), and other things of that sort (writers, producers, backups, production, companies, etc.) which are all connected to each other under the Motown umbrella. We could dissolve the Supremes WikiProject if we must, and "merge" it into WP Motown, and anything else out there that might be Motown related, and not just focus on individuals, but the entire Motown genre itself! We could have all of that under one wiki-project! The Motown WikiProject sounds like a great idea! Is that ambitious or what! Best, --Discographer (talk) 20:20, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pooooollllleeeeeezzzz .LOL

Poekneegurl Poekneegurl (talk) 03:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Ben (album) article, which you have edited in the past, has failed a good article reassessment. Please see Talk:Ben (album)/GA2 for concerns raised. The review is on hold for an initial seven days. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 18:15, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	you have a good way of expressing opinion Ahmedunbreakabletato (talk) 15:48, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Lixxx235 (talk) 05:36, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know about edit summaries and I should've added one to my recent edit. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 06:32, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This relates to first creation, not subsequent recordings. No song gets two years of creation. See the category for more details. Thanks. --Richhoncho (talk) 15:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to coordinate discussion on criteria for inclusion, on the article talk page. You may like to contribute. Thanks. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:11, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for taking care of this. I was trying to fix the Russian entry by following the pattern of the others in the list. It didn't work. I didn't put it in originally, just noticed it while reading the article.--FeanorStar7 10:16, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

No problem. Russia's chart operates differently on here than other countries, it seems. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 14:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just making sure that you know that I have nothing to discuss ... as all I did was revert my accidental rollback click ... that you re-reverted, adding the chart back, the you reverted your revert of the rev ... well, yeah ... Steel1943 (talk) 02:27, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BrothaTimothy. You have new messages at Steel1943's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time.

Steel1943 (talk) 15:56, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hi I was interested in changing the intro of Michael Jackson invincible to,,,,,,,,,,"was his final album",, then on the next sentence put "it was his 10th studio album", however I have run into some opposition,,,,,,--65.8.187.36 (talk) 09:40, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If it says "final album in his lifetime" (meaning his final album released while alive), I'll leave it on there. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 17:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PointersEnergy2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Shake It Off (Taylor Swift song) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Shake It Off (Taylor Swift song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:12, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Holidays!
	Hi, BrothaTimothy! Have a happy and safe season, and a blessed new year! Holiday cheers, --Discographer (talk) 18:11, 24 December 2014 (UTC) [reply]

all producer must be playing keyboards ,michael was playing all of them and the violin comes from "You Rock My World" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmedunbreakabletato (talk • contribs) 15:24, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	thanks a lot (y) Ahmedunbreakabletato (talk) 17:59, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

first of all it's nice talking to you . it's not darkchild playing the keyboards on the track it was michael plus michael never had used any virtual instrument in his tracks michael was producing music played in real ones he didin't produce electronic beat,and he was the music producer of his tracks the other producers credited with him was playing and selecting instruments with him and if you could remember all in your name michael was playing keyboards and drums and the rest of the instruments without the guitar was played by Barry Gibb . thanks a lot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmedunbreakabletato (talk • contribs) 18:00, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article I'm Crazy 'Bout My Baby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability for this b-side, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 09:01, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey dude! I saw you added Aretha Franklin to the list of musical child prodigies. You stated that she played organ, do you have a source for that? Do you know if she's ever recorded playing on the organ? I'm fascinated by the Hammond organ, and Billy Preston — whose name you added to the list, too! — is a hero of mine. :-) Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.213.140.122 (talk) 18:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's mentioned in a few Aretha-related biographies. You could check her book, Aretha: From These Roots, I think it's mentioned that she played organ. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 20:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer, will definitely check out the book! 94.213.140.122 (talk) 21:33, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear BrothaTimothy,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I forgot I spent that long as a Wikipedia editor lol BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 18:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Esther Gordy Edwards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 217IP (talk) 00:55, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Esther Gordy Edwards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esther Gordy Edwards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 217IP (talk) 15:51, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great work! But, can't we avoid statements like "..reached the pinnacle of pop stardom..."? See WP:PEACOCK. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:00, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm doing a cleansing in the references, and there's one without complete description (without title and author first name) and I couldn't find the book. The reference is:

• (Gates 2004, pp. 344)

From my search I guess a possible candidate is:

• Gates, Henry Louis (29 April 2004). African American Lives. Oxford University Press. p. 334. ISBN 978-0-195-16024-6.

The article history says that you inserted that reference. Do you have the title/author/year (or ISBN)?

I'll keep watching your User talk (please forgive anything wrong I did because I'm new to wikipedia).

Feelthhis (talk) 15:02, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's the one. I thought I put it in though lol BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 22:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you get the chance, do you think you could take a look at recent edits at Tina Turner, which I've reverted? As well as being unnecessary in my view, they were poorly written and poorly sourced. I've asked the editor concerned to make the case for their edits on the talk page, but there's no sign of that happening yet. I'd appreciate a second opinion from you, if they keep persevering. Regards, Ghmyrtle (talk) 23:31, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why tina turner has no legacy IN WIKI? Diana Ross to have a legacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana_Ross but tina turner no why ? — — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calearm99 (talk • contribs) 02:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're gonna have to go to Tina's talk page to discuss that. I'm sure it has been discussed before but you have the right to address that there. But I do think there is a reason WHY it's not included because of the way you wrote it was not part of how Wikipedia does things with articles, your edits read more like fan pages. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 18:26, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think you will write about the Legacy on Tina pls. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calearm99 (talk • contribs) 11:18, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Holidays!
	Hi, BrothaTimothy! Have a happy and safe season, and a blessed new year! Holiday cheers, --Discographer (talk) 00:41, 24 December 2015 (UTC) [reply]

The article Funk Me has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 13:55, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Life is for Learning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article All the Way Round has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 08:55, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Diana-everyday.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nowhere-to-run.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to replace this image with this US side label. Shall I have this image deleted? --George Ho (talk) 18:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Go ahead. I don't mind. :) BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 17:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article When I'm Alone I Cry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/When I'm Alone I Cry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444 (talk) 20:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, When you created Gordy family page, one of the entry refers to Booker T. Washington store. Would you know what that would mean? I don't see any references on Booker T. Washington page related to him starting a store business or something. May be adding more details may enhance this page.

Chirag (talk) 19:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Isleystwistshout.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BrothaTimothy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Holidays!
	Hi, BrothaTimothy! Have a happy and safe season, and a blessed new year! Holiday cheers, --Discographer (talk) 00:01, 24 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marvin-Gaye Tammi-Terrell.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:49, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

i have opened a dispute resolution page to try to resolve this with you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Marsha_P._JohnsonRebismusic (talk) 02:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comments to you in talk on the Johnson page, thankyou Rebismusic (talk) 07:43, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BrothaTimothy. You have new messages at Talk:Marsha_P._Johnson.
Message added 08:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Slazenger (Contact Me) 08:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you join me to create a wikipedia page on Cultural impact of Michael Jackson? Akhiljaxxn (talk) 13:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC) Hey its been so long that u promised to cntribute to this page .hope u will do it before it got deleted. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 17:07, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh man, I totally forgot about it. I'll try to see what I can do. Are they threatening to delete it anytime soon? BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 19:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes one user trying hard to get its deleted.can i u please mail me ur email or fb? Akhiljaxxn (talk) 01:07, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I'm here. But it would be funny if I'm the only one doing anything since it don't seem like a lot of people are discussing it on the talk page? Also I doubt one person wanting to delete it will make Wikipedia automatically do that? BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 03:32, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nah but can u fix the typos grammer and remove the so called fancruft from it please?. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 11:13, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do that later. That article definitely needs a makeover though. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 17:54, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well hope u will do before it too late.i'm really sorry if i'm bothering u.i think u r the only user stil active who participated in mj wiki porject. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 01:10, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nah it's alright. I'll try to do something about it this weekend or something. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 01:42, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• BrothaTimothy, While I am absurdly worried about Akhiljaxxn's competence, I am sure that you can find the problems with this article that its existence is very difficult to justify. It had been copy pasted without prior consensus on the main articles (Michael Jackson, They Don't Care About Us), violating WP:CFORK.

Sources are problematic too, they are nothing more than hysteria over his death (8 years ago), we had same hysteria over the death of Chuck Berry this year. And none of those sources do anything more than cite a few names that are already listed with number of sources on List of artists influenced by Michael Jackson. Only thing we can do now is wait for at least 1 month before redirecting it to the main article (Michael Jackson#Legacy and influence) if there has been no consensus to move content from concerning articles. Excelse (talk) 07:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh OK, yeah I see what you mean... but maybe the article can be totally rewritten without it being read like a fan blog? BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 22:39, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Marvin Gaye & Tammi Terrell2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Decorative use of a non-free screenshot in Marvin Gaye#Initial success. There's nothing specific about this 1967 appearance with Tammi Terrell anywhere in the article and the screenshot itself is not the subject of any sourced critical commentary, so the context required by WP:NFCC#8 for the file's non-free use is lacking. If the performance deserved to be mentioned, then it content about it can be added with a citation to a reliable source, but there's nothing really specific in the article about this screenshot which requires the reader actually see it to understand any related article content.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:23, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BrothaTimothy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I replaced File:Isleyshoutsong.gif with File:Shout by The Isley Brothers US vinyl.jpg. Feel free to remove the tag and reinsert the GIF version if you object. If you do not object to the deletion of GIF version, then please feel free to add {{db-g7}}, which speeds up the deletion, if you wish. George Ho (talk) 12:08, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Isleyshoutsong.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Diana-swept.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I missed that one - thanks! Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:46, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Janet Jackson singles has been nominated for merging with Template:Janet Jackson. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:24, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BrothaTimothy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edit to this article, however, I've reverted it as no reason is given for this change, nor references/citations provided to show this is the correct version.

Although I'd assume it's unlikely that this is an example of intentional misinformation vandalism, we do have to err on the side of caution with edits like this. Thank you for your understanding. Ubcule (talk) 12:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I forgot what I edit, unless it was its chart position. That's the only thing I remember editing. Lol BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 16:51, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have been cleaning up the citations on Ike & Tina Turner, and have become aware of your involvement in that article, and that you turned it from a redirect into an article. Indeed, the bulk of the article has been written by you. Well done. Good work. You deserve this:

		The Rock music Barnstar
		For awesome work on creating and developing Ike & Tina Turner. SilkTork (talk) 09:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep on editing - Wikipedia needs people like you. SilkTork (talk) 09:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate it and thank you for cleaning up the citations as well. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 18:11, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to Michael Jackson.
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Please don't make edits like you made at List of awards and nominations received by Michael Jackson. Combine your small edits into one edit and always add a concise, appropriate, edit summary. --qedk (t 愛 c) 20:35, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will. Thanks. I'll do it more carefully next time. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 21:45, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Supremesymphony.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Floy-joy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:High-energy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ScherrieSusaye.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Supreme-japan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Supremes-4tops-dynamite-lp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Supremes-webb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Supsvol3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:52, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Magnificent 7 (Four tops album) coverart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:54, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anger (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anger (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lennart97 (talk) 17:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of cover versions of Donna Summer songs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks non-notable; lists of all songs by an artist that have ever been covered are generally not encyclopedic. Has been in CAT:NN since 2016.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm _Talk 19:39, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ricky Owens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricky Owens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 19:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that in Template:The Supremes, several of the Supremes' albums are classified as "Other albums" instead of "Studio albums": A Bit of Liverpool, The Supremes Sing Country, Western and Pop, We Remember Sam Cooke, Merry Christmas, The Supremes Sing Rodgers & Hart, and Diana Ross & the Supremes Sing and Perform "Funny Girl". This has been the case, apparently, ever since those albums were added to the template in this edit in 2008, so I'm not going to change it on my own without finding out why. Why are these albums not classified as studio albums, just because they are focused on particular styles or songwriters? They were recorded in the studio. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:55, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PointersExcited.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Songs in memory of Marvin Gaye has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho (talk) 13:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of awards and nominations received by Whitney Houston, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:25, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of awards and nominations received by Whitney Houston, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:25, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The introduction on Whitney Houston page was already well written. We do not need to change it Phạm Huy Thông (talk) 09:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I understand that. I respect it. It is. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 18:44, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add the Billboard Adult R&B chart if the song appeared on the Hot Hip Hop/R&B Single chart, as per WP:USCHARTS. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 23:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page I Will Always Love You, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marvin Gaye promotional photo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:09, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am not super familiar with the topic, but I have worked with the What's Going On (album) page for a bit and think it is very well done with no noticeable issues (to me at least :P) Have you considered making a good article nomination for it? detria^skies 16:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have thought of nominating it to the good article group for a while but I didn't know if there was anyone that would vouch for it lol :) BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 17:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well I am glad to have inspired you! I just thought it was odd the very first album on WP:ALBUM's goal of getting the Rolling Stone 500 list all to GA/FA wasn't any of these yet.

Although to be fair, there is probably a crazy number of articles on this site that can be at least GA with just a little work. detria^skies 15:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

True. I always felt the articles related to the album and its singles needed an overhaul for a long while. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 19:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]