User talk:OGBC1992

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Lee Thompson Ska Orchestra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lee Thompson Ska Orchestra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Egghead06 (talk) 11:28, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Jimmy Dickinson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South East England (European Parliament constituency), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Larry Sanders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hugh Paddick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guy Henry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Liam Hughes (footballer, born 2001) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. Too soon.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Vitezslav Jaros, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Babalola, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Death in Paradise.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OGBC1992. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Liam Hughes (footballer, born 2001), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Trevor Peacock, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 15:10, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Santa Monica High School, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 03:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laura Baldwin (sailor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weymouth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jordan Henderson, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:55, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This feels like a very threatening message for something as innocuous as not including a citation. --OGBC1992 (talk) 09:46, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it feel threatening? Mattythewhite (talk) 23:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because you’re literally threatening me with being blocked from editing for a mere oversight, rather than any deliberate malice. No good faith assumed. Suggest you be more careful of your tone in future. OGBC1992 (talk) 10:50, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding new content to a player's honours section without a source isn't a "mere oversight", and looking at your talk page there is clearly a pattern emerging. My message wasn't a threat, it was fair warning that if such editing continues it could result in a block. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Loyiso Gola. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MOS:POSTNOM is clear Post-nominal letters should either be separated from the name by a comma and each set divided by a comma, or no commas should be used at all. If a baronetcy or peerage is held, then commas should always be used for consistency's sake, as the former are separated from the name by a comma. It also says: This template needs the Stop deleting commas if they are already there, it isn't wrong to have them. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 16:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where this manual provides options, consistency should be maintained within an article unless there is a good reason to do otherwise. The Arbitration Committee has ruled that editors should not change an article from one guideline-defined style to another without a substantial reason unrelated to mere choice of style, and that revert-warring over optional styles is unacceptable.[m] If discussion cannot determine which style to use in an article, defer to the style used by the first major contributor. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 16:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. OGBC1992 (talk) 17:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you seem to be in the minority here, can I suggest that you add your opinion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Community Shield runners-up. Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 17:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't aware that was there - ta. Will add my tuppence worth. OGBC1992 (talk) 19:05, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Descendants of George V, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 12:54, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That entire section is unsourced, so I suggest you remove the whole thing, rather than focussing on one particular amendment. OGBC1992 (talk) 15:49, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The section isn't wrong. Your addition was. You've made up a nonsense false statistic and stuck in the article. You will be blocked if you continue to insert garbage that you have invented yourself. DrKay (talk) 17:51, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't a single citation in the entire Statistics section of that article. By all means add some, but at the moment there aren't any. That's objective fact. And by 'making up a nonsense false statistic', I presume you mean 'can count', as the most cursory glance at the table directly above the Statistics section reveals that George V has several great-great-great-grandchildren who are listed. Being able to count to 21 isn't really the same thing as inventing garbage, is it? OGBC1992 (talk) 18:10, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is why you keep getting warnings. You are not listening to them. You are not reading edit summaries. There are way more than 21. I told you this explicitly but you are not listening. The others are not listed. Stop acting up. Pay attention. Do as you are told--provide sources; do not make things up. DrKay (talk) 18:26, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is also explicit on the talk page: Talk:Descendants of George V#Removal of Mary's descendants, which of course you haven't bothered to check or read. DrKay (talk) 18:28, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have not edited it since your latest reversion, if it hadn’t escaped your notice. Perhaps you could have assumed good faith in the first instance, it might have saved a lot of time and prevented you looking quite so hysterical.

I shan’t edit again; good luck with your personal project, which it seems very much to be. I notice that the section of the ‘Talk’ page you linked to featured no other contribution or consensus. I presumed one might require at least some cursory agreement to proceed with such a change but that’s by the by.

Also, your entire Statistics section seems unsourced. Maybe add some citations to improve the article? Have a nice evening doc. OGBC1992 (talk) 18:48, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing requires no permission, particularly when the suggested edit has received no opposition in two weeks and the performed edit has not received any opposition ever.

It's not my section. If you want to remove it, go ahead. DrKay (talk) 19:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate this WikiProject. Sharouser (talk) 11:20, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, only Lords use the post-non PC to show they are privy councillors because they automatically have the title The Right Honourable (below the rank of marquess; Marquess = Most Hon, Duke = His/Her Grace) and need the PC post-nom to differentiate non-PC from PC lords. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 19:58, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Holding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your change to add the Order of St John to Harry Crerar has no visible effect because the Canadian Template:Post-nominals/CAN does not list them. According to the latest, the use of postnominals for the Order of St John is not authorised in Canada. [1] However I am not sure if this was the case in the Second World War period. Suggest you take it up at Template talk:Post-nominals Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:18, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2022 Political Honours. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2022 Special Honours & 2022 Prime Minister's Resignation Honours. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2022 Special Honours & 2022 Prime Minister's Resignation Honours. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 05:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Gilbratarian memoirists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OGBC1992. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vítězslav Jaroš, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mohammad Anwar Elahee have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. GiantSnowman 13:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Footballer chivalry honours. GiantSnowman 13:57, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you still edit warring despite the discussion which I have invited you to and which you have already commented at?! Please self-revert (as I have done) and restore the old, stable version pending consensus. GiantSnowman 14:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OGBC1992. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Vítězslav Jaroš".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:39, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just a note for your last edit, the medals/awards have since been renamed, and although the award list does give the old names for the awards, the category sections should list the new name.^[1] Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 11:03, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this - although the Government press release, issued after the release you reference here, specifically refers to these individuals receiving the QGM, not the KGM. Therefore I think there is very good reason to list them as such in the article. OGBC1992 (talk) 11:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi OGBC1992! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Yohann Gène that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Paulpat99 (talk) 08:44, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting my work. OK but it said that Nadine Dorries and the other one will not stand at the next election even though they had already resigned. So please before reverting someone's work just maybe modify it if it need it not be rude and tell other editors they are wrong. Jord656 (talk) 12:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jord, didn't mean to be rude and sorry you've taken it that way. I reverted because it is a section specifically for those MPs who have announced they won't contest the next General Election. Both Dorries and Adams were counted in this category until they both resigned prematurely, which is slightly different to the circumstances regarding Boris Johnson as he'd not given any indication of stepping down. The section probably reflected this fine beforehand, which is why I did a straight revert, rather than modify your work to take it back to where it was anyway.

Take care - cheers. OGBC1992 (talk) 13:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that we only include domestic league games in the infobox - so no Cup or Continental matches etc. Please also ensure that when you update the stats you also update the date, using ~~~~~. If you have any questions please ask. GiantSnowman 17:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers GS - I did only include domestic appearances in the infobox, didn't I? Thanks for the reminder about updating the date too though. OGBC1992 (talk) 06:53, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Foote Wood, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Foote Wood (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gilbert Inglefield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GBE.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think that Steve Baker, Craig Williams and Graham Brady were not appointed to the Privy Council on 20 October 2023. Just as Craig Whittaker, Marcus Jones, Kelly Tolhurst and Maria Eagle were not appointed on 22 February 2023. You should wait until next Privy Council meeting. Mike Rohsopht (talk) 14:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Tranmere loans were separate spells, so please do not 'total' them. GiantSnowman 18:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 19 § Category:Zoos by year of disestablishment on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jeppe Tverskov. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GiantSnowman 10:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please revert this edit per Wikipedia:BRD. There is simply no reason for that claim to require multiple citations; it doesn't matter that other articles use both. Launchballer 15:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People with acquired Sammarinese citizenship has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Errollyn Wallen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 100 Women.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion on the article Category:2020s debut plays but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:20, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Jean Ballantyne has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 New Zealand Licence is not a compatible license. -- Diannaa (talk) 14:51, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello OGBC1992. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:OGBC1992. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=OGBC1992|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. I noticed you have inserted various adaptations by London Children's Ballet into various works. The upcoming ones are especially concerning. Do you have any personal/professional relationship with the Ballet? Graywalls (talk) 14:47, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Graywalls; no, I have no relationship with this company, professional, personal or otherwise. I simply realised - in the course of my regula reading - that their productions are not listed amongst the various Adaptations sections and sought to correct that, albeit yes, in quite a block. I hope that is acceptable. OGBC1992 (talk) 14:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. Promotional editing has unfortunately become a common thing, so, I had to check. Graywalls (talk) 15:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood; with regards to The Secret Garden, it is a previous production anyway so definitely not promotional, and with regards to Ballet Shoes, the content relating to the upcoming production was not added by me (although I feel that announcement of a stage adaptation at the Royal National Theatre is worthy of inclusion all the same.) I will endeavour to find some secondary sources to back these edits up. Thanks. OGBC1992 (talk) 15:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Graywalls I see that despite our establishing this was not promotional you have chosen to revert a whole suite of edits en masse; if you checked the source you would see that these were not adverts but pages from an archive of past productions, of equal encyclopaedic value to other adaptations listed, and should not therefore be deleted as advertorial. Kindly reinstate.

If you feel a non-primary source is necessary (for the given citations count as primary sources, rather than adverts), then tag them as such, rather than just deleting. OGBC1992 (talk) 18:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not appropriate to introduce contents in the way you did. See WP:BURDEN and WP:DUE. Graywalls (talk) 18:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's interesting how you change your argument every time you're challenged but I can't be bothered to argue it anymore. I plan on restoring the table of previous productions to the main LCB article as I think it is of genuine encyclopaedic value, in the same way that filmographies and discographies are to the articles for actors and musicians. OGBC1992 (talk) 19:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My initial concern was that you may have been doing so in connection with the organization. However, just because you're not doing so on their behalf doesn't make such addition ok. Please see WP:NOTADIRECTORY and WP:NOTAWEBHOST. Encyclopedia articles are not a place to host a list of products/releases/etc of a company. By the time you got to the Ballet's page, you'll note that page was severely contaminated by PR spam accounts LondonChildrensBallet1994, LCBallet and Londonchildrensb. Graywalls (talk) 19:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi OGBC1992. Thank you for your work on Carling Academy Leeds. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

"Carling" isn't mentioned in the target page.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Dotrice family indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Peggy Jay family indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sullivan family (soccer) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Prior-Palmer family indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]