User talk:Omnis Scientia

This is Omnis Scientia's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days

Congratulations, Omnis Scientia! The list you nominated, List of Jewish Major League Baseball players, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been asking several editors about improving the article Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, but but since they will do it eventually, I was hoping that since you are capable of making necessary changes when it is most convenient, I ask you in the most humble manner that do you consider expanding the one of the articles sections? The section “Authority, powers and constraints” with sub-headings describing the legislative, executive or the royal prerogative powers of the Prime Minister in the most detailed way? This is a request to add some improvements that I think it needs. Since a new Prime Minster has been elected, I think that the page now needs to be updated with some information. 112.134.244.71 (talk) 04:53, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will look into it. The specific section you have singled out has its own page though so I don't think it needs anything more than a basic overview of the PM's powers. Omnis Scientia (talk) 07:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheila Lochhead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Margaret MacDonald.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First women admitted to degrees at the University of Oxford, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:24, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Delegacy for Women Students has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. TSventon (talk) 13:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See the Earwig report here. TSventon (talk) 14:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TSventon, thank you for bringing it to my attention. It wasn't my intention to do so. I've further slimmed down, rewrote, and added back the info so its in line with copyright rules of Wikipedia. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:02, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for writing the article, by the way. I reran the Earwig report with "Use links in page" here and there are still two passages highlighted in red, one starting "The Delegacy was established" and the other starting "The Delegacy effectively took over". The article needs to be in your own words, Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing is not sufficient. TSventon (talk) 14:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewrote it as best as I could in my own words. Its down to 13% now which is mostly the names of organizations. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Omnis Scientia, and welcome to Women in Red. With your interest in sports and history, you should be a useful member of the project. I realize you have already written informative biographies but you might nevertheless find it useful to look through our Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to D-O-D-G-E-R-S (Oh, Really? No, O'Malley!). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315 Online events: New: | Women in film and stage | Indigenous women Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) | Translation contest 2024 (July, August, September) | Women in Sports (July, August) Announcements from other communities TBD Tip of the month: Check your athlete's notability before researching and creating her bio. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Jane Forbes Clark, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 15:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is especially needed at Jane Forbes Clark. Also, please read WP:OR and WP:BRD, both of which were disregarded in a recent edit to that article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I try to add an edit summary but, sometimes, for quick edits I forget to. Thank you for telling me about the preference, I'll add that. :)

I don't think I added any orignal info though. At least, not on purpose. I added because its mentioned in the cited references, even if briefly. If I'm mistaken then my apologies. Omnis Scientia (talk) 23:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Danny Kaye Dodgers Song 1962.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 185.172.241.184 (talk) 05:07, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Omnis Scientia, I saw that you recently worked on the JDC article. Would you mind looking at my edit request for Jay Ruderman, an Israel and disability rights activist who partnered with the JDC and the Israeli government to support inclusion for people with disabilities in Israel? I would like to add this content to his article, as well as his organization's young activist affiliate lobbying the MLB to change the term "disabled list" to "injured list." Thank you very much! LiatDo (talk) 06:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LiatDo, hello there! How are you? So I went to check your edit request out and, by the looks of it, your edit request has been intacted by another user. See here. Omnis Scientia (talk) 18:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Omnis Scientia, thank you for looking into this! It seems that it was marked as answered by mistake as you'll see that only half of it was answered. For clarity, I crossed out what has been implemented. Thank you! LiatDo (talk) 12:24, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the user who did so did it because, in one case, it doesn't apply to Ruderman specifically which I would agree with. Ultimately, MLB's decision to change to I.L. was a multi-person campaign so you can't give credit to Ruderman for it.

The other one I have implemented into the Activism section. Omnis Scientia (talk) 15:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Omnis Scientia, thank you very much for helping to update the article! LiatDo (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! :) Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Greenberg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:23, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephen Greenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern League.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:50, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Coffey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Coffey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AlexandraAVX (talk) 18:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]