User talk:MasashiInoue

Welcome!

Hello, MasashiInoue, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! – Allen4names 21:06, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	In recognition of recently having made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia, please accept this barnstar. Thank you for updating and improving football-related content, and for all your contributions to the encyclopedia. Keep up the good work! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 19:07, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think whether to add card info to the scoring summary is an editorial choice. Personally I think it is not necessary and never do it. One problem is consistency: if you add for one match, you have to add for all matches, otherwise the readers may think that no cards are issued for the other matches. So it will put a large amount of burden on the editors, not to mention that sometimes the card info are just not available. I know of some pages that the editors consistently add card info for all matches, in that case I am fine with that. But if the edits mess up the page, then I think you can simply revert because the info is just not commonly given across all pages. Chanheigeorge (talk) 11:53, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Masashilnoue, please leave the card info in 2011–12 Swiss Cup, there is no inconsistency in this articel, card infos are inserted for all matches. Thanks and greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 13:09, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – OFC Third Round. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 02:05, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why you undid my edit? Zambia are in Group C as Defending champions, look the regulations Art 71.1.2. --Stigni (talk) 17:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League group A standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 01:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2012–13 UEFA Champions League group B standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 01:39, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2012 League of Ireland Premier Division table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 17:36, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013–14 UEFA Europa League group stage may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
#If, after applying criteria 1) to 4) to several teams, two teams still have an equal ranking, criteria 1) to 4) are reapplied exclusively to the matches between the two teams in question to determine their to determine their final rankings. If this procedure does not lead to a decision, criteria 6) to 8) apply; |} |} |} |} |} |} |} |} |} |} |} |} |} |}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:21, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013–14 UEFA Europa League group stage may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
#If, after applying criteria 1) to 4) to several teams, two teams still have an equal ranking, criteria 1) to 4) are reapplied exclusively to the matches between the two teams in question to determine their to determine their final rankings. If this procedure does not lead to a decision, criteria 6) to 8) apply; |} |} |} |} |} |} |} |} |} |} |} |} |} |}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:28, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Just wanted to inform you that several times today you have undone other editors edits while making your own edits like here. I do not now what happened and how it could be like this but if there is edit conflict you should not just copy your text, that is disruptive editing. Please watch out for this in the future. QED237 (talk) 22:28, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You say "red cells no longer needed" and then you add the red color? Come on now, make me understand before warning templates start flying. QED237 (talk) 23:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I got the two columns in the edit conflict window mixed up, hence ended up doing the opposite of what I thought. Sorry about that.MasashiInoue (talk) 23:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay no problem, I can understand that. Mistakes can happen and there are many edit conflict during these "events" with many matches ending at the same time. Please, just be more careful next time.QED237 (talk) 23:16, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You keep on undoing other people edits I see (example here). Perhaps you should wait and not edits when there are conflicts. QED237 (talk) 22:25, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mai Aizawa may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Negima! Magister Negi Magi] Happy☆Material ver. 6 - Early Summer Version (Natsumi Murakami)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When updating templates such as Template:2013–14 Premier League table please read the documentation to update the table correctly. Now you moved two switches that should not be moved, they are important to display the correct teams on the club season articles. You should only mnove fb cl team-lines. You must also update the positions in helper template Template:2013–14 Premier League table/p. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 14:48, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MasashiInoue!

I see you contribute a lot on Olympic Games and Olympic Sports related articles.

If you are interested to also discuss about events, you can join us on Totallympics, a discussion forum about Olympic Sports.

Totallympics covers all Olympic Sports (both Summer and Winter) and if you want you can also contribute with results of all events you are interested to follow.

If you want to join us, you can join us on totallympics.com

See you!

Thanks,

MatteoITA --MatteoITA (talk) 18:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to 2013–14 UEFA Europa League knockout phase, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Next time do not revert correct edits without providing an obvious reason Uishaki (talk) 22:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]