User talk:69.121.181.163

Welcome! Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, ool-4579b5a3.dyn.optonline.net (69.121.181.163), is part of a pool of dynamically allocated addresses and is registered to Optimum Online. It may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register). Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports can be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 69.121.181.163, has made edits to Adrian Toomes that do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

• Help contents – the main help page.
• Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 07:46, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Vulture (Marvel Comics) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:43, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Roderick Kingsley, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 06:16, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Hobgoblin (comics), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 17:15, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. It appears that you tried to give Alternative versions of the Green Goblin a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 21:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, 69.121.181.163. You have new messages at Bellezzasolo's talk page.
Message added 21:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 21:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have reverted your edit to the Miles Morales article. Citations go after the material that they support, not before them, per WP:PAIC. The Collider article indeed supports the passage that indicates that Miles got his powers in the Marvel's Spider-Man episode "Ultimate Spider-Man", which means that citations needs to go before that passage. You also provided no rationale for removing the word "episode," or for changing the phrase "second season" to "season two". When removing or changing material, or making contentious edits, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 14:46, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Nick Fury Jr., did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JamesHSmith6789 (talk) 01:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Mr.Sarcastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jasper Sitwell have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Tom Cavanagh. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation of this behaviour may result in loss of editing privileges. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 06:34, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bolivar Trask, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Alexcalamaro (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Henry Peter Gyrich, you may be blocked from editing. Amkgp (talk) 03:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. Describing your edits as "minor changes" while you remove whole paragraphs is both misleading and unhelpful. RandomCanadian (talk | contribs) 04:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at List of Marvel Comics characters: L, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. KMagz04 (talk) 02:56, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm JellyMan9001. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mary Jane Watson without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. JellyMan9001 (talk) 05:10, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Alternative versions of the Green Goblin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. TheImaCow (talk) 16:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Queen (character), you may be blocked from editing. You changed the redirect from a link to a disambiguation page to another target, without regard for the fact that readers searching for Queen (character) may be looking for a different page. The right thing to do would have been to add the Marvel comics character to the disambiguation page. I am giving you a Level 3 warning because I see many other user warnings on your talk page. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 12:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Jason Macendale—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hobgoblin (comics). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rob Paulsen, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 15:56, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at List of Marvel Comics characters: S. 11Fox11 (talk) 20:29, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I noticed that in this edit to Gene Dogs, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 02:16, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Marvel Comics characters: M. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Geordie (talk) 19:13, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at William Salyers. Ed talk! 13:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  only (talk) 15:36, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

ALL THIS BECAUSE Truman Marsh WAS SWITCHED TO Ultron AND THEN TWO WORDS FOR A MINOR COMIC BOOK CHARACTER. I WILL NEVER DONATE MONEY TO WIKIPEDIA BECAUSE OF YOU CARITURES WITH NO F@*$ING LIVES AND I KNOW I'M NOT THE ONLY ONE THAT SEES IT THIS WAY. ALSO HOW THE F@#$ AM I SUPPOSE TO COMPLAIN WHEN I CAN'T EDIT ANY OTHER PAGE? 69.121.181.163 13:40, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Nnadigoodluck. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of Marvel Comics characters: T—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 01:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Melmann. I noticed that in this edit to List of Marvel Comics characters: S, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Melmann 22:00, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of Marvel Comics characters: S, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Melmann 22:24, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anne Weying, you may be blocked from editing. Cairo2k18 (talk) 02:31, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop going in and drastically changing the same Wikipedia pages like Tarantula and Chameleon with no regard for consistency. I don't appreciate having to go in and fix your mistakes. Please understand that I am not targeting you specifically in any way. I am simply trying my best to keep Wikipedia free of trivial details and bad grammar, among other things. I acknowledge that I also return to certain Wikipedia pages that I previously edited to make changes and that you have made constructive edits. However, several of your so-called "minor changes" are strongly leaning towards vandalism in certain cases. For example, there's no consistency in how you word Chameleon disguising himself as Maria Corazon and using the Tarantula battle suit. Every time you edit information pertaining to them, no two edits of yours ever look the same. Given your history for vandalism despite your constructive edits, as well as bad grammar and use of trivial details in your most recent edits, I'm not sure what to think. If anything, please be more careful of your grammar as well as WP:TRIVIA, WP:FANCRUFT, and WP:CONCISE. Blazewing16 (talk) 00:04, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is getting ridiculous. On top of having far too much trivial/unnecessary material, your edits are getting long-winded, which violates WP:CONCISE. Why did you change "...to help his foster father, the Red Skull" to "to help the Red Skull, who is his foster father"? The former is fine as is. The latter is unnecessarily long. That's like turning "Abe helped his friend Bob" into "This person, Abe, helped Bob, who happens to be his bestest friend in the world". Wikipedia is about having the information explained as concisely as possible. Not with using all the words to fulfill some imaginary word count. Not to mention, you're now involved an edit war to maintain Maria Corazon's (currently) non-existent status as the 2017 Spider-Man series' incarnation of Tarantula, which is also dipping into original research, which basically means making changes solely based on your own theories and beliefs of how something works as opposed to proper, reputable sources. If she does become Tarantula or there's a source confirming she is supposed to be the Tarantula released later on, that's fine. Just provide that source when you add the information. But right now, you're assuming she is the series' definitive version of Tarantula. And don't even get me started on why "Minor changes" and "Major changes" are still not sufficient explanations to explain your changes. If you hate Wikipedia so much, why do you continue using it? Just please read WP:CONCISE, WP:TRIVIA, WP:FANCRUFT, and WP:OR. Blazewing16 (talk) 06:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Frozen. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Shogun Warriors (comics)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 00:43, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Chameleon (Marvel Comics). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 23:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, 69.121.181.163. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spider Queen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:37, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Tom Cavanagh. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Also, don't use blatantly misleading edit summaries. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:15, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Aikku Jokinen—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 03:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 16:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Spider Society. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to inform you that "Good detailed edits. Please leave as is." is not a good edit summary. This is a misleading edit summary, meaning people might undo them because you made bad edits and lied to the Wikipedia community. Also, you can't ask people to leave it as is because people will go in and change it anyway. You can't stop them from doing that, especially if they have a legitimate change that needs to be made or an addition that needs to be added. I've noticed you've made some good edits lately, but your grammar and edit summaries still need work. Blazewing16 (talk) 03:04, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. you can't say "Good detailed edits". In this case, "good" is subjective. Just because you say they are good doesn't mean they are. This kind of edit summary also sounds like a misleading edit summary. Blazewing16 (talk) 00:44, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing wrong with calling Peter Parker the original Spider-Man and Miles Morales the second Spider-Man because that is literally what they are. Please stop what you did to Jefferson Davis' page because you will confuse other Wikipedia readers. Again, I concede that you have made good edits. However, I'm having trouble believing you have your fellow editors and readers in mind since you only seem to be out for yourself from what I've seen. Blazewing16 (talk) 01:04, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you insist on adding badly sourced and/or unsourced material, such as Phil Urich's supposed appearance in Marvel's Spider-Man? That sounds like it's your personal opinion. Plus, episode refs do NOT count. Yes, they are prevalent, but that doesn't mean you can use them all the time. Also, you cannot make additions with a "citation request" either. Editors will remove it because there is no proper sourcing. Without proper sourcing, you cannot back up anything add. Blazewing16 (talk) 02:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JPxG. I noticed that in this edit to Scarlet Spider, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. jp×g 05:57, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Suonii180. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ultron without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Suonii180 (talk) 17:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to , you will be blocked from editing. Nightscream (talk) 23:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop deleting content from the Detroit Steel article without a valid rationale, as you did a second time with this edit. The article is not about Doug Johnson, it's about Detroit Steel (as indicated by the article's title), and Sasha Hammer was indeed one of it's wielders, as the passages in question make clear. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 15:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What proof do you have that the Into the Spider-Verse Scorpion is Maximus Gargan other than they're both Hispanic? That sounds incredibly racist of you to just assume that. What, is the MCU Mac Gargan based on Maximus because he's Hispanic too? 2600:1700:BD70:9E70:CD6C:C84D:B5B9:DE04 (talk) 00:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What other iteration of Scorpion is Latino besides Maximus "Mac" Gargan?

69.121.181.163 (talk) 23:52, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 69.121.181.163. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Red Beetle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Mhawk10 (talk) 00:57, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Smallangryplanet. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to David Langford have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Smallangryplanet (talk) 23:43, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please create the link David Langford (comics) or David Langford (character) in order to appear constructive.

69.121.181.163 (talk) 23:50, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Langford. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:01, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Anti-Venom, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. MaxnaCarta (talk) 02:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]