Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States/Archive 11

This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:WikiProject United States. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

→

Archive 15

Do we have an article on foreign-born American presidential candidates that qualify for president? It would be a good overview to work from, and should cover eligibility requirements and why the candidates are eligible. This would include John McCain (born Panama), Cruz (born Canada), and anyone else I can't think of for the moment. And there's the statements that Barry Goldwater (born Arizona Territory) wasn't American enough as he wasn't born in a state. -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 06:04, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

The issue is covered at Natural-born-citizen clause, which already has sections for everyone you've raised. postdlf (talk) 18:09, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

John McCain wasn't born in Panama. He was born in the Panama Canal Zone, which was considered sovereign territory of the United States, although not a state. This is a minor distinction, but makes him similar to Goldwater. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

The Panama Canal Zone is part of Panama now, and as of the time he ran for president, so not like Goldwater, since Arizona is still part of the US. It would be like that situation on the TV show "The West Wing" where a bit of a state was given to Canada when the border was redrawn, and questions about the citizenship of the staffer who was born in territory no longer part of the US. -- 67.70.32.20 (talk) 06:27, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Well, not really. United States Federal Law 8 U.S. Code § 1401 - Nationals and citizens of United States at birth, says they were all natural-born United States citizens at birth. The child inherits the citizenship of any parent who is a United States citizenship. Birthright citizenship in the United States. Ted Cruz's mother was born in Delaware, Goldwater's mother was born in the United States. McCain was born on a naval base to United States citizens. — Maile (talk) 13:43, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

The naming of the article Coat of arms of George Washington is under discussion, see talk:Coat of arms of George Washington -- 67.70.32.20 (talk) 04:59, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

I'd like to alert members of the project that one user has taken it upon himself to remove most children from infoboxes on every U.S. President -- see this for example. I would like members of the project to know because such wholesale changes should be discussed first, at least in my opinion. Calidum T|C 05:22, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Infobox MOS states that the "Children" field should contain number of children rather than the names of children, unless the children are notable (for our purposes in the infobox, this means having a Wikipedia article). It reads: "Only if independently notable themselves or particularly relevant. Number of children (e.g. three or 3), or list of names if notable...For privacy reasons, consider omitting the names of children of living persons, unless notable." The guideline regarding inclusion of children's names is found here. Someone with 2 children but only one child notable would read: "2, including Joe Blow" (with Joe Blow's name in piping that redirects to the article on them). Being the child of a president does not make that child notable (see WP:NOTINHERITED for more). The names of the non-notable children taken out of the infobox should remain in the article body, of course. This is not a "wholesale change", just a change to put the fields of the associated article infoboxes more into compliance. Every edit summary for these changes contained a clear explanation referencing the Infobox MOS. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:23, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

• Talk:German declaration of war against the United States (1941)#STRONGLY disagree with point that declaration not in Germany's self interest and
• Talk:German declaration of war against the United States (1941)#Hitler had no choice.
• The article itself could use some attention as well. BMK (talk) 16:41, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:United States#RfC: Do you agree with the following a) lead sentence and accompanying note for the United States article, and, b) for the info box area.

The proposal is generated by a Request for Mediation, summarized and linked at Talk:United States#Mediation update Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/United States. Please contribute to the request for comment. Thanks. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 19:14, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

We have a recently-created article on The New American - a publication of the John Birch Society - which might benefit from scrutiny from experienced contributors. The article seems to be lacking in any suggestion that the views of such a fringe organisation might be seen as controversial, and appears more than a little promotional in my opinion. I note that it was created by a new contributor with no other significant editing history. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:46, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

My first post. The 1969 draft was a conscription, so "all-volunteer" as it says below, seems incorrect:

Origins and consequences[edit] In the late 1960s, President Nixon established a commission to recommend the best ways to raise military manpower, to keep the draft or to institute a volunteer army. After much debate within the Nixon administration and Congress, it was decided that an all-volunteer force was affordable, feasible, and would enhance the nation’s security

Steve Henshaw D Steve Henshaw D (talk) 12:42, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

If I find an article that's part of a related WikiProject, such as WikiProject California, should I also add the banner of this wikiproject to that article's talk page? I'm not sure what your policy is. Compassionate727 (talk) 20:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

It should be fine logically, but there's been a big brouhaha here about scope and how WPUSA infringes on more local level wikiprojects, so it might cause a storm in a teapot -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 07:57, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Americans for Prosperity#Request for comment: .2444M of .24140M raised by Americans for Prosperity in 2012 election cycle from Koch-related funds. Please contribute to the request for comment. Thanks. Hugh (talk) 17:19, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Please help with this request for comment. This is an update to the request for comment and a plea for wider participation. The RfC question asks for community feedback on a one-sentence addition to the funding section of a US political advocacy group, Americans for Prosperity. The main source for the proposed addition is a pair of reports in The Washington Post, supported by FactCheck.org and the National Journal. The proposed content summarizes a key finding of investigative journalism. The discussion of the RfC centers on the due weight of investigative journalism into the sources of funding of a US political advocacy group that is generally not legally required to disclose their funders to the Internal Revenue Service or the Federal Election Commission. Attention from uninvolved editors with some experience with the proper application of WP:DUE is respectfully requested. Generous excerpts from the sources are provided in the statement of the RfC question for your convenience. Thank you in advance for your time and attention. Hugh (talk) 15:45, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

This request for comment will most likely close Thursday 6 August 2015. This is an update and a request for wider participation. Issues in the appropriate application of our due weight content policy remain in the discussion. Your comments are needed. Please help with this important request for comment. Thank you in advance for your time and attention. Hugh (talk) 15:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm the public relations specialist for the King County Library System in western Washington State. One of our staffers pointed out that the Wiki page for the lirary system is outdated, and I've been assigned to the task.

I have edited and updated the copy, updated and/or changed the links to current information, and swapped the links on each community library to direct users to the libraries, rather than the communities.

I'm aware of the need for neutrality, and have done my best to be completely objective in the information provided, but I offer the information for review by a neutral third party.

The update--with new photograph of a new library--is in a Word file. I have not posted or edited anything on Wikipedia yet, and am reluctant to update/edit the article directly without some oversight.

How do I proceed?

Many thanks,

Marsha Iverson

(employed as PR Specialist for King County Library System, also active in many other areas.) marsha.iverson4@gmail.com (MIverson124 (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC))

Responded on MIverson124's talk page. Cheers Gmcbjames (talk) 05:59, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello. I would like to invite you to WikiConference USA. This community gathering will be Friday-Sunday 9-11 October (with Columbus Day being Monday the 12th) in Washington DC at the National Archives and Records Administration.

Persons interested in participating may present a submission, request one of about 25 travel scholarships, or plan to attend. Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:51, 5 August 2015 (UTC) Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:46, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello all! I was curious if anyone else thought it might be a good idea to make a (nonbinding) guideline on how individual US state WikiProjects should organize themselves. Some of the individual state WikiProjects don't look so good and have little content, but a few I think are really good. The front page of the WikiProjects for Hawaii, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, Texas, California, Arkansas are all pretty nice, I think, and might be used as examples. Georgia, Texas, and Massachusetts all have a nice organizational bar at the top. I'm sure with discussion some other additions could be added to a guideline, but I was just curious if anyone thought this was a good and realistic idea first before making a huge guideline. (And nonbinding is the most important part for me, if the community does agree to a guideline for the US State WikiProjects.) JonathanHopeThisIsUnique (talk) 20:39, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

That's a huge can of worms. There were gigantic arguments about WPUSA "taking over" and dictating to state wikiprojects, last time anything was tried. (like adding switches to indicate state projects in the banner, or merging inactive state projects into WPUSA as taskforces) -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 07:28, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for replying! That's exactly why I wanted to stress that this would only be a guideline, not mandatory. It would just be some ideas to help any State wikiproject that wants some suggestions or to help those that want standardization. JonathanHopeThisIsUnique (talk) 03:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

You should propose it at each state project you wish to do this to, first, and get their assent before asking to add it to this project. As I said, it was a huge can of worms last time, just adding mention of their projects onto WPUSA's banner. If they assent this time, then each project, individually should give permission, or we may run into the same can of worms. So ask the state projects first, then come back here for each project that says yes, and we can discuss each individually. I would say you'd need atleast 1-month of discussions at each state wikiproject, before coming back here, because last time they complained about being to quick on the trigger as well. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 03:49, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for replying again! :) I thought it would be easier for them to come here, but if it's more likely going to work without any issues, then I have no problem doing that. Also, sorry for not replying sooner; I forgot that I needed to refresh to see updates. :)JonathanHopeThisIsUnique (talk) 04:29, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

JonathanHopeThisIsUnique - You may wish to check out: Wikipedia:WikiProject X. I would suggest researching the difference between guidelines - policy - and essays. I believe what you are requesting is an essay which can be approved by consensus by a wikiproject, while either a guideline or policy must have wide consensus through a venue such as the Village Pump. All State wikiprojects are only as good as the number of editors involved - many State wikiprojects may be either semi-active or inactive. Just some thoughts - Cheers Gmcbjames (talk) 06:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

I work on WikiProject Kentucky although I don't speak for it. In principle, I can support something like this. However, what's good for state WikiProjects would generally be good for all WikiProjects so maybe it's really a better idea to work on Wikipedia:WikiProject X as stated above. I'm not sure what state WikiProjects would uniquely need outside of guidelines (essays) about the structure of the main state article and major child articles (e.g., "History of..."). Do you have any specific ideas for common features for state WikiProjects? Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 10:46, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

I for one would very much like to see this project succeed but if you guys think you are going to be able to do this you are kidding yourselves. If you start dropping notices on the talk pages of these project the trolls are going to come out of the wood work and you are going to be covered in drama. There are a lot of projects and editors out there that have extremely strong article ownership issues and no one stops them. So good luck. RingofSauron (talk) 10:59, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

I believe most state wikiprojects are dormant (at least that's the case for most of the states I follow). Echoing what was said above, at least one editor tried this years ago, back when most state projects were active. It resulted in a bunch of hard feelings, with us loosing at least one good editor. I support the idea, but I think you're walking a tightrope between the projects that are essentially dead, and those that are proudly active and refuse to succumb to "the man". With that said, the optimist in me says that Wikipedia has matured some since the last time this was tried, and your chance of success now is probably better than before. So bottom line, I support you trying, but be prepared and grow some thick skin, as you may need it.Dave (talk) 03:48, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

I agree with the premise that there should at least be some minimum standard of consistency. bd2412 T 16:08, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Most of the state projects where dormant when that editor started try to get the state projects to work together then. Its even more the case now for several reasons including general editing being down and a complete loss in faith in the WikiProject system by many editors. WikiProjects are a magnet for drama (and shouldn't be). Some projects are allowed to exert undo influence and article ownership and although both are against various rules, they continue to get away with it. So, when less active projects like this one try to do anything they get attacked. RingofSauron (talk) 18:29, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Can I ask for input at Talk:Jazmin Grace Grimaldi#Media References. Thanks. CDRL102 (talk) 23:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you folks know that Samuel J. Randall is nominated for featured article. I'd be happy to receive input from anyone who is interested. Thanks! --Coemgenus (talk) 21:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

I've been working on List of cities and towns in Alabama trying to get it up to featured status. I'm wondering if anybody has knowledge on the specific role of local governments in Alabama. It seems most of the documents I can find give most of the local governance power to the county. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Mattximus (talk) 01:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

FYI, there's an RFC going on at WP:VPR the Village Pump, concerning article naming for using "XYZ American" or "XYZ Americans" as the title of these ethnic articles -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 05:37, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

There is someone removing redirects and pointing all the articles about Art in the United states to a bunch of circular lists that they have created.

• Art of the United States was a redirect to Visual art of the United States
  • It essentially lists every artist in that article and links to
  • Colonial American Art which is a list
  • 18th-century American Art which is a list
  • 19th-century American Art which is a list
• Previously American art went to the disambiguation page American art (disambiguation) but it is now redirected to Art of the United States

The major articles Visual art of the United States, Music of the United States, Cuisine of the United States are being unlinked and added to the bottoms of these pages as misc "See also" articles.

Dunno if anyone cares, just pointing it out.--Savonneux (talk) 12:25, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Yes, this is a problem. I have restored some of the old links and redirects, but not tackled the period lists, which something needs to be done about - perhaps just deletion. WP:FORK applies. Wikiproject Visual art certainly care - that should have been notified, & I will copy all this there. Johnbod (talk) 12:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Wasn't sure where to go. I mostly just do cleanup.--Savonneux (talk) 12:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

United States v. Washington is undergoing evaluation for possible promotion to Featured Article at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/United States v. Washington/archive1. Feel free to stop by and assist in assessing this article. GregJackP Boomer! 17:22, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

I am a retired British Diplomat. In December, 1940 my father, a British Civil Servant working for the Air Ministry was transferred from the British Supply Board to Canada in Montreal, Canada, to the British Air Commission in Washington DC. That Commission, headed by Sir Henry Self and later by Sir Richard Fairey (of Fairey Aviation) occupied the whole of the Andrew Mellon building. My father's office was in what had been the main bathroom of Andrew Mellon's apartment.(the bath taps, which had reputedly been gold plated, had been removed!). He worked there until his section needed more room and the Commission acquired an annexe at 1520, 18th Street. My father's office was on the top floor of that building and that floor was used by the Aeronautical Inspection Directorate which had British inspectors stationed at all the industrial installations in the USA making aircraft and aeronautical equipment for the British Government during the war. Winding down the Commission's activities took a long time after the war and my father was in charge of winding up the activities of the Aeronautical Inspection Directorate. He completed that task in March, 1946 and returned to the UK. Unfortunately, I do not know either when the British Air Commission first occupied the Andrew Mellon Building, nor when they vacated it. It had already been occupied by them for some time when we arrived in December, 1940 and was probably still occupied by them until late 1945 or early 1946. No doubt the lease records held by the owners will give the actual dates.

I attended High School at Western High School, Washington, DC, and graduated from there in June, 1943, at the age of 16. I then went to George Washington University, but was forced to abandon my studies there in May, 1945 and return to England to do military service. ( I served 3 years in the RAF, finally being demobilied in 1948. I then studied for, and successfully took, the competitive examinsations for entry into the British Civil Service, joining the Foreign Service in February, 1950. I retired from that Service (which had been renamed the Diplomatic Service) in 1987 at the age of 60, having served in 11 different countries, including 3 years as Special Advisor to His Majesty the Sultan of Brunei. See also the British version of Who's Who. ) During my High School summer vacations, like many American schoolchildren, I got a job. I worked in the mail room of the British Air Commission for 8 weeks in 1943 in the Andrew Mellon Building.

The existing Wikipedia article on the Andrew Mellon Building makes no mention of the wartime role of the building. I hope I am not alone in thinking that that should be remedied.

You may not know that there were so many British Government missions in Washington DC during the war that part of K street West of 18th Street NW was nicknamed "Little Whitehall" from the number of British missions which had offices on that street. It might make an interesting topic for research, perhaps as part of a broader look into all the foreign missions in Washington during World War II. It ought to include the struggles between the unofficial De Gaullist mission and that which backed General Giraud as being the true representatives of Free France.

86.17.101.206 (talk) 11:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Eric V Nelson eandmnelson@ntlworld.com

You and other editors can put this information into an article, providing WP:Reliable sources can be cited. This does not, alas, include anyone's unpublished personal memories. Jim.henderson (talk) 22:07, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedians,

If you want to translate material about the US government and history into: Arabic, Bengali, Bosnian, Chinese, French, Haitian Creole, Korean, Polish, Russian, Serbo-Croatian, and Spanish: I found some glossaries: http://www.p12.nysed.gov/biling/bilinged/bilingual_glossaries.htm - I hope they may be useful in your efforts to translate WhisperToMe (talk) 16:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

This section on unicameralism in the U.S.A. is incomplete in that it speaks only of present-day unicameralism and says nothing of states and territories in the U.S.A. that had unicameral legislatures in the past. Michael Hardy (talk) 03:18, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Cirt (talk) 09:51, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Task_Force_K-Bar

The image with the text "US Navy SEALs from Task Force K-Bar in Afghanistan, 2002." is incorrect. This is not an American soldier, in fact, it is a Norwegian Special Operator from FSK or MJK. Not only have I seen the image before somewhere in a Norwegian setting, but you can see it on the camouflage pattern he uses (partrol hat, jacket and chestrig) which is exclusively used by Norwegians.

He even uses the standard Norwegian "GRU (Grunnutrustning)" (chestrig setup).

The desert-pants however, are similar to what US (and other) forces use. It's not unusual that NORSOF use American and British gear, but the other way around REALLY is.

Even the headpiece is consistent with both form and color of the standard Norwegian Armed Forces "balaklava".

The fact that this article was actually made by US military personell is really embarassing. Get your facts straight.

Sorry for the bad English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.97.234.98 (talk) 22:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Please post this message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. That would be the best place to get a response on this subject. — Maile (talk) 23:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

peace be upon those who follow guidance. 151.248.26.18 (talk) 00:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Young_Allee 151.248.26.18 (talk) 00:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Allee these two article are about the same peson-as i saw-, even not i suggest to make a disambiguation.

Two different people. One is the grandson of the other. — Maile (talk) 23:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

For the life of me, I cannot understand why low importance is being placed on the Coastal erosion in Southeast Louisiana article, as indicated in the template, when so much is at stake for the survival of my region. Sorry folks, but that that is unacceptable. How would you feel if your state lost 30 football fields a day? I'm sure that if it happened to any other state, it would get a higher level of importance. The Louisiana wetlands serve as a critical barrier against storm surges during hurricanes and tie into the ecosystem of the whole nation. Keep in mind that New Orleans sits at a crucial strategic point the mouth of the largest river of commerce in the world and has a tri-axial port: 1) sea port 2) North-South river port, and 3) an east-west port, the Intercostal waterway, which runs East and West. What do you think Jefferson had in mind when he bought Louisiana? In his writings he said that the primary reason was to gain access to the port of New Orleans. But, our region is threated and needs more than this kind of lackluster response. Upgrade the article's importance please! Garagepunk66 (talk) 01:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Well, Animalparty is the one who put that assessment there. However, there's nothing to stop you, or anyone else, from editing the talk page and upgrading the importance. — Maile (talk) 22:56, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

@Garagepunk66: The importance scale is somewhat subjective, and anyone is free to reassess. Per the WikiProject US importance scale: The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of the United States. One rule of thumb I use "how likely is this subject to appear in a book on X", with X being the Project title. I have no qualms with Coastal erosion in Southeast Louisiana being a Mid level importance. Note that I ranked the article for the United States project, leaving WP Louisiana assessed; it probably merits a higher priority on the Louisiana sub-project. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

I've created a new article on White House Astronomy Night.

Suggestions for additional WP:RS sources would be appreciated, at Talk:White House Astronomy Night.

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 15:10, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Land of Gorch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Land of Gorch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Cirt (talk) 10:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

See WP:RM/C#September_11,_2015 for several USN renames that have showed up -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 04:56, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

I was actively involved with this event and severely dispute a number of the events as contrived in this article. I was a member of the Greensboro Youth Council and Claude Barnes served on the committee I headed. This article is very incomplete, does not convey a number of related issues, and generally is lacking in factual recollections both pro and con related to this incident. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.194.2.229 (talk) 00:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

The perhaps you would like to comment on the article's talk page. — Maile (talk) 14:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

I have nominated this list for featured list removal Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Gene Kelly filmography/archive1, because I feel It doesnot meets the criteria's anymore. Please add your comments. The instructions for the review process are here. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Above link leads to discussion as to whether Kevin McCarthy (California politician) should become the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC at the Kevin McCarthy disambiguation page. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 05:42, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Dear all,

there is a disagreement whether congressional terms end on the 3th or 4th of March. The discussion is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics#US Congressional term end dates. Input is appreciated.

Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 07:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Doing this in mass has not been popular so I'm going to try a single state-by-state proposal but starting here, is there interest in incorporating Wikipedia:WikiProject Alabama (starting with the "A"s) as a taskforce into Template:WikiProject United States and into the greater project. I'll make the same request at the Alabama project with this location being the main focus (it may be better to flip it so that the state project is the location but let's start this way). -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

I've wondered why most states are incorporated but others are not. I see no reason for them to be separated since anything relevant to WP Alabama (in this case) is also relevant to WP US. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Now that I am again able to edit I would like to clarify this. A few years ago I noticed most of the US related WikiProject were dead and tried to keep them alive. I asked every one if they wanted to participate in a collaboration. Some agreed, some disagreed and some did not respond at all because the projects were basically defunct. For the ones that agreed or didn't reply I added them to the project banner for WPUS. For the others I skipped. Alabama was a project that originally agreed but then changed their minds later and wanted out (like Florida and a couple others). The whole thing turned into a giant fight and some treated it like a hostile takeover. So I would be very careful before doing anything with any more projects. Personally, its my opinion that this project could operate independently of any other projects and include theirs as well (such as having a subproject for California and California has its own project as well). Others disagree. Right now, none of the projects are really flourishing and most are inactive at best including this one. So until this project and or some of the others gain some activity, I would advise against adding any more projects. I hope that helps to clarify.Reguyla (talk) 14:20, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Let's not forget that this banner can get beyond ugly because it includes not just some states but also some cities within the state projects as well. It can be exceedingly complicated for that reason. California I suspect won't join given the number of task forces related to regions which aren't really done on this projects so those taskforces would be "lost" in a sense if there was a merger here. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:10, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

France in the American Revolutionary War has been the subject of two recent move requests (Requested move 29 January 2015, Requested move 20 August 2015), both of which have failed. Perhaps frustrated by the failure to move, but undeterred from purpose, new User:AdjectivesAreBad chose to build the created redirect into its own article. France in the ARW is a legitimate topic, has existed since 2005, and deserves improvement. Newly created Anglo-French War (1778–83) is a clear content fork, and should be deleted and redirected (or perhaps merged) to the France in the American Revolutionary War pagespace. I encourage interested editors to visit the merge discussion here. BusterD (talk) 21:12, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Traditions and history of the United States Navy, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

I've requested Peer Review for Not in Front of the Children.

Feedback would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Not in Front of the Children/archive1.

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 06:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Please take part in a discussion at Talk:Freedom Caucus on whether it is correct to say in Wikipedia's voice that the caucus is a far right organization. Iselilja (talk) 16:38, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

I've created a new article on the book Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand.

Input and suggestions for additional secondary sources would be appreciated on the article's talk page, at Talk:Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand.

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 06:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

I have created a new article titled Resignation from the United States Senate. Michael Hardy (talk) 04:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

I added a request to create a page for Downtown Milwaukee. Currently there is a page dedicated to the "Neighborhoods of Milwaukee", but many other peer cities also have a downtown page, and it seems appropriate and contiguous for there to be one for Milwaukee, as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2002:AD59:18C6:0:F832:1CDA:4FBF:765D (talk) 02:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

The usage and primary topic of Painted Desert is under discussion, see talk:Painted Desert (Arizona) -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 10:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Greetings! I've never attempted to do something like this, so I'm looking for community support. I recently copy edited Intellectual property protection of typefaces and I noticed it was listed as Start-class. I'd like to know what the process might be for getting it assessed for a higher class, like C-class. Thank you! Jarmihi_GOCE (talk) 18:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The file File:WellsSpicer.JPG has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. An editor believes that because the photo taken before 1885 does not have an author or an initial publication date, it should be removed. This is true of many, many images about Old West events and people in the United States. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it and many others like it related to U.S. history may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. — btphelps ^{(talk to me) (what I've done)} 22:44, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

See this The Atlantic report:

• Heltman, John. "Why the Public Can't Read the Press." The Atlantic. November 29, 2015.

This affects Wikipedia since we use newspaper articles as sources. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:49, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Participants here often create a lot of content, have to evaluate whether or not a subject is notable, decide if content complies with BLP policy, and much more. Well, these are factors at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship.

So, please consider taking a look at and watchlisting this page:

• Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

You could be very helpful to evaluate potential candidates, and maybe even find out if you would be a suitable RfA candidate.

Best wishes,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

what is more imformation about pioneers wagons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krystalgirl (talk • contribs) 20:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Try Conestoga wagon and Covered wagon. — Maile (talk) 20:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Please see discussion at Category talk:Wikipedia requested images by subject#Proposing to move this category and its children to "requested images (of/in ...)". Thank you for your time. JJ98 (Talk) 17:59, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Most courteous Greetings to you historical music lovers! Your participation is ardently sought in helping to establish one of Wikipedia's newest projects - 19-century American Music a collaborative venture to improve the coverage of '19th-century American Music' on the English Wikipedia. A treasure trove of adventure awaits you as we improve and expand upon the wealth, heritage, history and impact of this music genre. What is a project without participants like you? If your interest is piqued please leave your calling card and add your name to our proposed Project page. You will be kept informed of the development of this new project in the coming weeks. To leave your valuable opinions and suggestions, please contact me. With All Cordiality and The Very Best of Regards, Barbara (WVS) (talk) 14:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

A few more editors are needed to complete the A-Class review for Chicago Pile-1; please stop by and help review the article! Thanks! AustralianRupert (talk) 04:33, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

A few more editors are needed to complete the A-Class review for Nike-X; please stop by and help review the article! Thanks! AustralianRupert (talk) 04:33, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

A few more editors are needed to complete the A-Class review for Jacob L. Devers; please stop by and help review the article! Thanks! AustralianRupert (talk) 01:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

A few more editors are needed to complete the A-Class review for Operation Linebacker; please stop by and help review the article! Thanks! AustralianRupert (talk) 05:34, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

A few more editors are needed to complete the A-Class review for Operation Linebacker II; please stop by and help review the article! Thanks! AustralianRupert (talk) 05:34, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

What is all the hub hub about General Abrams charging one of his troops for some type misconduct? Thanks Steve Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). His Wikipedia page makes a remark about him making a possible career ending mistake to charge this soldier. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:3e8c:e800:5cb8:1611:799f:5e00 (talk • contribs)

I'm not seeing that in either the article on Robert B. Abrams or Bowe Bergdahl -- could you give us a link? Antandrus (talk) 22:42, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Input from anyone with any familiarity with the subject requested at Indentured servitude in the Americas to check for weighting and comprehensiveness.thanks in advance... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:16, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bamberg,_South_Carolina

Population is listed as around 3,700 with 10,000 households. All the population statistics are suspect. I think someone misinterpreted the Census data. Someone might want to fix. 205.144.215.150 (talk) 03:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

The 10,000 households bit was added by an IP back in 2006, and somehow didn't get noticed for ten years. Thanks for catching that; I changed it back to the correct value. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 04:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that Chowder, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

An example, the article on Ram Mounts is flagged as being part of WikiProject United States (which I will abbreviate WPUS). Sure, it's a USA company but it sells its product around the world. What is the benefit to the company itself, or to its customers, especially its foreign customers, or to Wikipedia, or to the WPUS project, or to the USA in general so to flag the article? Surely WPUS is about things uniquely American (by which I mean here "pertaining to the USA"), it's not about everything American. Or is it? Is it a nationalistic project or is it one to celebrate or lament (as and when appropriate) that which is uniquely American? Paul Beardsell (talk) 04:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

American companies face American laws, so the legal structure of the company would be American, and thus the people to consult would be WPLAW or WPUSA. Same as any other company based in any other country, where the local laws regulate the company. A UK-based company would thus have a WPUK banner. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 07:23, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Since it appears that article alerts do not include notices of Redirects for Deletion I would like to bring the following discussion to your attention in regards to the redirect Americans renouncing citizenship in records numbers. Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 17:18, 23 January 2016 (UTC)please ping me

Albany-Schnectady-Troy should be listed as 61, not 51 based on 880+ population

i dont have a job or no income, so how do i get health insurance? Spudman201127! (talk) 13:21, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is underway at WikiProject Lists for those who are interested in giving their input. Rowssusan (talk) 03:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

The usage and topic of Tennessee Whiskey is under discussion, see talk:Tennessee Whiskey (song) -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 06:40, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

There has been a proposal to merge 75th Infantry Regiment (Ranger) with 75th Ranger Regiment (United States). Also mentioned is the United States Army Rangers page as a factor. The proposal is on the latter, but having two articles is also questioned on the former.

• See: Talk:75th Ranger Regiment (United_States). - ^theWOLFchild 11:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Is there a policy/consensus on whether places in the Confederacy during the civil war should be referred to as being in the USA or CSA in articles not about the war? I am referring in particular to this edit, although that anonymous editor has made similar edits to Josephus Daniels and maybe other pages.Smmurphy^(Talk) 16:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Eminem, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Canada in the American Civil War has been proposed to be renamed, see talk:Canada in the American Civil War -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 07:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

I've put together this useful map, detailing state WikiProject activity levels. MB298 (talk) 22:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

@MB298: Perhaps it should be renamed; File:United States WikiProjects.svg doesn't indicate what WMF site this is for. File:Activity level of United States state WikiProjects on English Wikipedia MAP.svg would fix that. (Since it's not for Commons, or WikiData, or Spanish Wikipedia) -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 03:53, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Lady Gaga is currently up for a peer review. See Wikipedia:Peer review/Lady Gaga/archive4. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:10, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

I came across this article today and... well, it sure needs a lot of work. I don't have the time or inclination to undertake this massive overhaul and while it probably deserves multiple maintenance templates, I try not to do drive-by tagging. Please please PLEASE the article needs your help. Please - someone - fix it up. I'll give you a mug of Wikipedia beer or whatever snack you want on your user talk page. Heck, this is what I'll do: I am going to create an award and everyone from this WIkiProject that helps to rescue this article by doing significant work on it I will place that award on your user talk page. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 15:00, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Shearonink holy crap. That page is a mess. Edit: I actually tidied it up a bit. Took me a bit but i think it is better. It could definitely be worth more edits for correction. Winterysteppe (talk) 03:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

The following Request for Comments has been posted at Talk:Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016#Request_for_comments: "In an effort to end the Wikidrama about this issue: should the sentence "Clinton's speeches to Goldman Sachs, for $675,000, have become "a campaign issue"" be added back, or is there a better way to add this referenced info? Thank you." Please reply over there.Zigzig20s (talk) 14:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

• Comment - I thought you decided to stay away from this issue, and this page, as a matter of personal safety? - ^theWOLFchild 22:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

It's an RFC to end the Wikidrama, as you may read above.Zigzig20s (talk) 00:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

For all you know it could do just the opposite and open the door to even more drama. This is especially so, considering that particular page and some of the characters there. There is no quick fix to the problems on that page, and it's likely to get worse, not better. It's a huge project, surely there are others areas of interest for you? Just sayin'... - ^theWOLFchild 00:26, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Respectfully, I have zero interest in going around in circles with you. But please don't discourage others from taking part in the RFC! Just let it be. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 16:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

@Zigzig20s: "But please don't discourage others from taking part in the RFC!" - And just how, exactly, have I done that? I haven't even posted on that page, nor exchanged any comments with anyone else in regards to that RfC. I only asked you why you are continuing to push a questionable issue, in light of the personal safety concerns you have repeatedly complained of as result of your participation there recently. I would think that, if anything, you'd want to avoid that area for awhile. But, whatever... - ^theWOLFchild 17:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

User: Thewolfchild: Please stop.Zigzig20s (talk) 17:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

@Zigzig20s: - Um... "stop" what? You made the comment that sounded somewhat like an accusation. I only asked that you clarify it. If you chose not to, that's fine, but please don't do it again. And if you don't want any more replies here... then stop posting them yourself. Yeesh. - ^theWOLFchild 17:44, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

This is an RFC to end the Wikidrama, as you may read above. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 17:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

(And they reply, again) Yes, it's an RfC, I can see that. But if anything, it may just add to the drama. The best way to reduce any drama there would be to avoid controversial issues for awhile. - ^theWOLFchild 17:53, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Nobody reading this WikiProject talkpage should feel discouraged by allegedly controversial drama. There is no such thing. The RFC was posted "in an effort to end the Wikidrama about this issue". Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 18:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Then why even mention "drama" in the first place? And why 'continue to mention it? - ^theWOLFchild 23:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Honestly Zigzig20s so few people read this page or do anything with this project now that Kumioko/Reguyla has been banned that I wouldn't even worry about anyone getting discouraged. They did most of the work to keep the US projects going and they have been virtually dead since. Pyrrhia (talk) 19:50, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Thewolfchild, what does "as a matter of personal safety" refer to in your comment above? Omnedon (talk) 18:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Probably not what you think it means. clpo13_(talk) 23:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Then let it be clarified. Omnedon (talk) 23:38, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

List of courthouse buildings in the United States: A, an article which may be of interest to this project, has been nominated for deletion: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of courthouse buildings in the United States: A. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 18:34, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

There are up to 30 free one-year Alexander Street Press (ASP) accounts available to experienced Wikipedians through this partnership. To apply for free access, please go to WP:ASP.

Alexander Street Press is an electronic academic database publisher. Its "Academic Video Online: Premium collection" includes videos in a range of subject areas, including news programs (like 60 minutes) and newsreels, music and theatre, speeches and lectures and demonstrations, and documentaries. This collection would be useful for researching topics related to science, engineering, history, music and dance, anthropology, business, counseling and therapy, news, nursing, drama, and more. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 22:12, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

A previous revision (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_cities_in_Indiana&oldid=712185151) of the article List of cities in Indiana has had a somewhat green background color for some entries in the table. I assume they've been used to refer to "second-class" cities. Can someone clarify on what they're used for? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! --Rollingcontributor (talk) 15:46, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

I am an artist. I paint in oil. I mostly paint tropical paintings. I would like some help to properly post my art, myself and about how I learned to paint on Wiki. Could someone who knows how, please help me out? You can also find the Highwaymen artists on Wiki. I worked and painted with highwaymen R.L. Lewis Jr. They have a very interesting story. Thank you, Artist Bonnie Butler — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArtistBonnieButler (talk • contribs) 18:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello there! There's an ongoing RfC concerning Paul Singer and WP:NPOV in a broader sense, that you might care to comment on. Thank you, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

• Category:Tie votes of the United States Supreme Court

New category, Category:Tie votes of the United States Supreme Court, please help populate with historical cases.

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 16:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

We'll probably have a bunch more in the coming months. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Agree with above prophecy by Muboshgu (talk · contribs). — Cirt (talk) 21:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that Pecan pie, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

I've listed The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for peer review.

Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise/archive1.

Thank you for your time,

— Cirt (talk) 23:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

I am in the process of clearing out the requested articles about individuals, creating stubs. So far I have created:

• Leopold William Brandenburg
• George Boyer Vashon
• Shonelle Jackson

Please review and expand if you want!

--MainlyTwelve (talk) 21:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

The usage and primary topic of A Streetcar Named Desire is under discussion, see talk:A Streetcar Named Desire (play) -- 70.51.45.100 (talk) 06:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Chrysler#RfC: Reception; rankings in independent surveys and ratings of quality, reliability, and customer satisfaction. Should the following content be added to the article?

Since at least the late 1990s, Chrysler has performed poorly in independent rankings of reliability, quality, and customer satisfaction.^[1][2][3] In 2011, James B. Stewart said in The New York Times that Chrysler's quality in 2009 was "abysmal," and cited that all Chrysler brands were in the bottom quarter of J. D. Power and Associates' customer satisfaction survey.^[4] In 2015, Fiat Chrysler brands ranked at the bottom of J. D. Power and Associates' Initial Quality Study, and the five Fiat Chrysler brands were the five lowest ranked of 20 brands in their Customer Service Index, which surveyed customer satisfaction with dealer service.^[3][5] Chrysler has performed poorly in Consumer Reports annual reliability ratings.^[6][1] In 2009 and 2010, Chrysler brands were ranked lowest in the Consumer Reports Annual Auto Reliability Survey;^[7] in 2014 and 2015, Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Ram, and Fiat were ranked at or near the bottom;^[8][9] in 2015 five of the seven lowest rated brands were the five Fiat Chrysler brands.^[10] In 2016, all Fiat Chrysler brands (Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep, and Fiat; Ram was not included) finished in the bottom third of 30 brands evaluated in Consumer Reports' 2016 annual Automotive Brand Report Card; Consumer Reports cited "poor reliability and sub-par performance in our testing."^{[2][11][12][13]} Chrysler has consistently ranked near the bottom in the American Customer Satisfaction Index survey.^[14]

Please comment at Talk:Chrysler#RfC: Reception; rankings in independent surveys and ratings of quality, reliability, and customer satisfaction. Thank you. Hugh (talk) 16:38, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

See this discussion, which suggests a bot task that would auto-assess some articles for WikiProjects based on other WikiProject templates on the page. Please feel free to comment on the discussion. It would be helpful to know if your WikiProject would be interested in auto-assessment. ~ Rob^Talk 17:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

There is a discussion underway to move the article Martin Luther King, Jr. Day (with a single comma) to Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Please share your opinion on the matter at Talk:Martin Luther King, Jr. Day#Requested move 22 April 2016. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

The usage and primary topic of South Portland is under discussion, see talk:South Portland -- 70.51.200.96 (talk) 08:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

This page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weaver%27s_Antique_Service_Station needs to be deleted. Even way back when it was posted, the station was closed. The pumps, etc. are now gone, and the windows boarded over. 174.34.38.138 (talk) 14:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Notability is not temporary. Even if the station is closed, that doesn't make it less notable than it otherwise would be. That being said, I'm having trouble finding outside coverage of the station, so it may not be notable in the first place. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 23:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Nathaniel G. S. Hart, an article I created, received a re-assessment from another WikiProject and, because of technical issues, they also changed the assessments for all the other WikiProjects (see Talk:Nathaniel G. S. Hart#Suggestions for Improvements). Anyway, so now the article needs to be re-assessed for this WikiProject. If one of you fabulous Project participants would re-assess it for WP/US I would really appreciate it. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 06:32, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Why is Red Bank Road called Red Bank Road? What does the 'Red' refer to? — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndianaGisela (talk • contribs) 19:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Please see this RfC, which members of this project may wish to weigh in on. ~ Rob^Talk 21:33, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

The name change discussion is taking place here. Comment if you'd like. Using my indoor neutral voice. Randy Kryn 22:39, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

I was using this page to find out how many Europeans were here at various times during the Colonial Era. I notice there is no mention of Spanish, French, Dutch (except in the Eastern Seaboard Colonies), or others. In 1620 when Pilgrims landed there had been Spanish settlement in GA, FL, TX and CA. Should the population of these Europeans not be included? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarasotabf (talk • contribs) 15:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Following a recent discussion at WP:VPR, there is consensus for an opt-in bot task that automatically assesses the class of articles based on classes listed for other project templates on the same page. In other words, if WikiProject A has evaluated an article to be C-class and WikiProject B hasn't evaluated the article at all, such a bot task would automatically evaluate the article as C-class for WikiProject B.

If you think auto-assessment might benefit this project, consider discussing it with other members here. For more information or to request an auto-assessment run, please visit User:BU RoBOT/autoassess. This is a one-time message to alert projects with over 1,000 unassessed articles to this possibility. ~ Rob^Talk 01:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that Hilton Hotels & Resorts, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

There is a discussion at Talk:Foreign relations of the United States#Importance assessments out of wack which concerns your project. –Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 23:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

I would like to request an article for the Angelina & Neches River Authority.
I would try to create one myself, but I understand that it would be a conflict of interest as I am employed by the Authority.
I'm available to provide any help/information that conflict of interest guidelines allow.

The Angelina & Neches River Authority is missing from the list of Texas State Agencies, as well as the River Authorities of Texas category, and it doesn't have a page of its own.

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:River_authorities_of_Texas

It does appear on a list of river authorities in texas:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Texas_river_authorities

Here are some sources of info:

• https://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/mwa01
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angelina_River
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neches_River
• http://www.anra.org
• http://www.anra.org/about/history.html
• http://www.anra.org/divisions/water_quality/crp

Jeremiahpoling (talk) 18:59, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

I am seeking help to implement an expanded Wikipedia article about Mark McKinnon, an American political advisor. As mentioned on the article's talk page, I have spent the last couple months working with Mark McKinnon and H+K Strategies to ensure the article's accuracy, and was paid to complete this project as part of my work at Beutler Ink. Is there someone who is willing to respond to my edit request and review my draft article to replace the existing version? I am trying not to edit the article directly, given my conflict of interest. Thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 22:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

 Done — Maile (talk) 23:03, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much, User:Maile66. I am marking this section as resolved. Inkian Jason (talk) 16:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

A suggestion has been made to change the title of Jewish nose to Jewish nose stereotype. One participant, after thoroughly losing the argument went, in opinion of some, on selective forum shopping. Therefore I am reposting his invitation where I think Jewish history took part as well. - üser:Altenmann >t 20:27, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Henry Hoʻolulu Pitman/archive2 needs a source review for formatting and reliability and a spotcheck of sources for accuracy and avoidance of plagiarism or close paraphrasing. Image review already done. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 21:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

You are invited...
	Women in Halls of Fame worldwide online edit-a-thon Host: Women in Red July 2016 #wikiwomeninred

--Ipigott (talk) 07:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Hi there,

I'm attempting to let this project's members know of Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2016 June, where a Move Review is taking place. A Requested Move was implemented, moving New York to New York (state), which is now being contested. This should be of relevant interest to this WikiProject. This notice was requested by several editors, and is performed as a courtesy.

Best, ɱ (talk) · vbm · coi) 15:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Many participants here create a lot of content, have to evaluate whether or not a subject is notable, decide if content complies with BLP policy, and much more. Well, these are just some of the considerations at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship.

So, please consider taking a look at and watchlisting this page:

• Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

You could be very helpful in evaluating potential candidates, and maybe even finding out if you would be a suitable RfA candidate.

Many thanks and best wishes,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Honorary titles of the United States, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Tyler_Summitt is listed as High Importance in this project. The subject barely qualifies as notable by Wikipedia standards. Is it a mistake for the article to be assessed with High Importance in WikiProject United States? --Crunch (talk) 21:58, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Probably. I reset the parameter. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:16, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:International halls of fame in the United States, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 04:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

There is a RM (requested move) to change numerous article titles which contain Dr. King's name which is relevant to this project. Randy Kryn 11:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is underway about moving New York to New York (state) and placing either the city, the dab page or a broad-concept article at the "New York" base name. Please contribute at Talk:New York/July 2016 move request. Note that the move was first approved on June 18 then overturned on July 7 and relisted as a structured debate to gather wider input. Interested editors might want to read those prior discussions to get a feel for the arguments. (Be sure to have your cup of tea handy!) — JFG ^talk 23:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Waltonian Park, Cranberry Township, Venango County, PA

http://cranberrytwp.org/the-local-area/local-history/

A point of special interest in Cranberry Township is Waltonian Park. In 1876, J. B. Smithman extended his streetcar line into Deep Hollow and there opened a popular park he called Smithman Park. Beginning in 1899, streetcar lines were extended to Franklin and Oil City. The park was bought by the Citizens Traction Company of Oil City in 1901 and renamed Monarch Park. At its peak, it contained 60 acres of woodland, dance pavilions, a theater, a cage of bears, a restaurant, picnic facilities, bowling lanes, a rotating swing ride, a roller coaster, slides, and flower gardens. The central attraction was destroyed by ice, cutting off streetcar lines to the park. This, coupled with the ever increasing use of the automobile, making it easier to drive elsewhere, led to the closing of the park just a few years later. Eventually, the property was purchased by the local Isaac Walton League. It remains open, but only faint traces of its former splendor can be seen. It is now essentially a nature park with picnic areas.

Deep Hollow, Venango County, PA Smithman Park Citizens Traction Company Monarch Park Isaac Walton League

thx DK — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.88.201.173 (talk) 03:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

There is a discussion that may be of interest to this project taking place at the above page. Your input is welcome. John from Idegon (talk) 14:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

I have nominated the redirects First Lady of Arkansas, First Lady of California, First Lady of Missouri and First Lady of New York for deletion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 29#First Lady of Arkansas. Your comments are invited at the linked discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 23:14, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

https://wikiconference.org/wiki/Submissions
--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

I am not a regular participant to this WikiProject, so please excuse my intrusion. Still, I thought this would be of interest. Thanks RightCowLeftCoast for introducing this conference in a previous note here.

I am inviting participants in WikiProject United States to WikiConference North America to be held in San Diego Friday to Monday 7-10 October. Here are further details:

• We are accepting submissions until 31 August.
• We are accepting scholarship applications 9 August - 23 August. About 40 scholarships are available only for people in Canada, the US, and Mexico. Last year about 200 people applied for scholarships.
• More volunteers are needed. In the usual wiki-way, anyone may comment on program submissions. At the conference in person, all staff will be volunteer and all attendees are encouraged check in with conference organizers about volunteering for the task queue even for an hour. Anyone interested may contact FloNight and Rosiestep to offer volunteer support.
• Major sponsorship for the conference comes from the San Diego Public Library who are providing the venue and a grant from the Wikimedia Foundation.
• This is the third year of this conference, with WikiConference USA being in New York in 2014 and in Washington DC in 2015. Check the schedules of those for examples of what kinds of programming will be offered this year.

Discussion about the conference on-wiki could happen at meta:WikiConference North America.

I am one of the organizers for this event. I thought that I should share this information here, as this conference includes the regional focus of this WikiProject. Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

I reviewed and accepted Conflict in Vietnam and at Home for main space, but I may have been a bit too fast here, as the speech duplicates Robert F. Kennedy's remarks at the University of Kansas. May I ask for the opinions of other editors how to best handle the situation. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 22:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

I think we need to notify Indy beetle about this. It qualifies for CSD (Candidate for Speedy Deletion) under WP:A10 . Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic. Click on the link, and it tells you the criteria, and how to do that.— Maile (talk) 23:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Just to clarify here, those articles are not duplicates. I wrote both of them. Both were given on 18 March 1968 in Kansas. One speech was given in the morning at Kansas State University, the other in the afternoon at the University of Kansas. While the latter incorporated material from the former, they were different. One notable difference, for example, is that in the latter speech Kennedy talks about the Gross National Product. Indy beetle (talk) 00:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

OK. Then if there are concerns about whether or not it covers the same material in part, then that's best discussed on the talk pages of either of those articles. Thanks for clarifying here. — Maile (talk) 00:15, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

The article was first deleted after a lengthy discussion cut short too soon. The article has been--and continues to be--improved. Please support my contention that the article should not be deleted.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 20:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

A discussion and vote as to whether Scott Walker should remain as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC or be returned to Scott Walker (politician) is ongoing at the above link. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 22:59, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

This discussion related to beauty pageant winners mainly focuses on whether those who won competitions for individual US states are notable. I think this is of interest to people in this project. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Beauty_Pageants#RFC_on_creation_of_consensus_standard John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:33, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

A discussion and vote as to whether Jonathan Edwards (theologian) should become the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of the Jonathan Edwards disambiguation page is ongoing at the above link. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 18:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

This article is about a US Olympics team related scandal. The naming of this article is under discussion, see Talk:Lochtegate -- 65.94.171.217 (talk) 06:06, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

I started Draft:Taco trucks on every corner recently. Do project members think this phrase may be notable enough for a stand-alone article? Please feel free to discuss on Draft talk:Taco trucks on every corner. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 13:56, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a poll taking place regarding the infobox image at the Donald Trump article talk page that project members might be interested in here. The polling is set to conclude on September 20, 2016. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 19:12, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I was wondering if anybody would like to collaborate long term in trying to reach a 10,000 article improvement/creation drive for the US at Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 10,000 Challenge like we're doing for the UK at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge? So far we've seen over 1800 article improvements in just a few months. Regional contests fuel the drive but it's a permanent goal now. Would American wikipedians be interested in running a similar thing and some state contests/editathons to increase output? There is also the idea of running a DC Area contest starting in January to help fuel this drive, including DC, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Connecticut and Delaware I think, to make reaching the target easier and more enjoyable long term.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_September_6#Major US cities. Regards, James (^talk/_contribs) 20:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

A deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unitarian Universalist Church of Kent Ohio may be of interest to members of this project. --JonRidinger (talk) 03:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

I've proposed splitting Health information exchange § List of United States health information exchanges into a stand-alone list. Since the new article will be specific to the United States, I'd appreciate comments from folks here, especially those interested in healthcare or health policy. I'm also seeking input from WP:HEALTH and WP:MED. —Shelley V. Adams ‹blame
credit› 14:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

I would like to request a reassessment of the Living Computer Museum to raise it from stub class, I have done extensive edits that have more than doubled the content and references. Thanks! MBlairMartin (talk) 20:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Opinions are needed on the following: Talk:Murder of JonBenét Ramsey#Requested move 20 September 2016. Among the concerns noted in the move discussion is whether or not WP:Undue weight is being given to a recent documentary. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 15:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that Spelling bee, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 04:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

A discussion regarding renaming of Van Nuys, Los Angeles to Van Nuys may have the potential of serving as a precedent for naming conventions of neighborhoods in cities throughout the United States. Participation is invited. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 20:28, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi all...I have a question about File:US-Canada border counties.png, a map which is being used as illustration on Canada–United States border, which I wanted to raise for discussion. I've already raised a similar question about its Canadian companion File:Canada-US border regions.png at WP:CANTALK, where consensus agreed with me.

My core issue is that the US-Canada border is, by and large, readily identifiable on a map of either country just by looking at it, and that's especially true of a map where Canada is actually shaded in gray as Canada, rather than simply being left off the map entirely. Accordingly, I question whether there's actually anything useful or genuinely informative about a map which merely color codes every county that happens to be touching a border that's already plainly evident. Is this really educating anybody about anything they couldn't already have figured out on their own?

On the Canadian map, there's also the issue of significant misrepresentation, because every county that touches a Great Lake at all is blue-coded regardless of whether its own boundaries actually touch the international water-border or not — that issue isn't present to the same degree here, because the creator of this seems to have been more careful, but I still question whether it's useful information or not. Since pleasure-boating or swimming across a Great Lake isn't an effective or even really legal way to actually cross the border, I don't really see how fronting onto a lake that happens to have a border in it, which is located dozens of miles out from the shore, is worth colour-coding a map for.

As I'm not a member of Wikiproject US, however, I can't make a unilateral decision about it — I can merely raise my concerns for discussion. So my question is, is this map actually useful in a way I'm not seeing, or is it just a silly and unnecessary map combining the patently obvious with the irrelevant the way I see it? Bearcat (talk) 23:34, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Anyone? Bearcat (talk) 16:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

I believe it should be modified to removed the water borders that are not connected by any way (other than water). This is to removed the borders that just end at water, instead of borders that actually are used (most land borders and a couple of water borders).— JJBers Public (talk) 17:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Started. Needs contributors to get it off and running!♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Great, thanks! Is there a way to mass-message Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/Members? Just an idea to help spread the word... Perhaps a Signpost announcement, too? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:14, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld and Another Believer: I don't think this is going to get much interest these days unfortunately. Since the main contributor to these projects was Kumioko/Reguyla and they have since been blocked/banned/bullied off or however you want to phrase it from Wikipedia, these US projects don't have a champion anymore and pretty much went off the rails. No one actively updates or supports them no one really wants to participate in them anymore. 2601:5CC:101:2EF2:3CC5:7598:C6E:F395 (talk) 22:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

I recently created United States national emergency with respect to Iran and need a native help with completing the rest. Thanks. --Mhhossein ^talk 12:55, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

During the course of a discussion on Remembrance Day missing from the Main Page for part of today, it's been pointed out that Independence Day (United States) doesn't really meet the quality standards usually desired for an article to be on the Main Page, particularly regarding sourcing. While I doubt anyone will actually lobby to remove this article from WP:On this day come July 4, 2017 because of this, it would be great if the article was improved. At the risk of falling into the trap of making to-do lists for other people, I think it would be an interesting project for editors of this Wikiproject to see how much they can improve the scope and sourcing of the article by then. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello all,

I am Bowen Yu, a Ph.D. student from GroupLens Research at the University of Minnesota - Twin Cities. Currently, we are undertaking a study about turnover (editors leaving and joining) in WikiProjects within Wikipedia. We are trying to understand the effects of member turnovers in the WikiProject group, in terms of the group performance and member interaction, with a purpose of learning how to build successful online communities in future. More details about our project can be found on this meta-wiki page.

If you are interested in our study and willing to share your experience with us, please reach me at bowen@cs.umn.edu. The interview will be about 30 - 45 minutes via phone, Skype or Google Hangout. You will receive a $10 gift card as compensation afterwards.

Thank you, Bowen Bobo.03 (talk) 23:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

You might want to talk to the people at Wikipedia:Education program, I'm not sure how similar your work is to theirs, but they might have some advice for you.Smmurphy^(Talk) 21:47, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

I've nominated the article about the television series Love, Inc. for Featured Article consideration. This article is a short-lived UPN sitcom that revolves around five matchmakers working at a New York City dating agency. Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Love, Inc. (TV series)/archive1. Thank you for your time. Aoba47 (talk) 22:12, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

The Donald Trump Talk page banner was changed by Triggerhippie4 to read: "WikiProject United States / American Television / Government / Presidential elections / Presidents (Rated B-class, …)". But the project itself is actually rating it C-class.

I had to revert an identical edit by that same editor and may have to do so again. --Dervorguilla (talk) 23:55, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

I saw this in my alerts, copied info you deleted and re-added it. Don't remove WikiProjects. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 00:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Greetings. There is an article under discussion at AfD which might be of interest to you: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreamland Villa, Arizona. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, all!

First of all, my apologies if this is the wrong place. I am posting here instead of the talk page because there are more people watching this page.

This article was created in 2013 and is currently 673,351 bytes in size. This problem has been brought up before on the talk page, but simply the article is too big. I would like to propose subdividing the article by states, for example List of Colorado counties and county equivalents. I am a firm believer in BOLD but I felt that this is a large breaking change and therefore should be discussed first. I'm willing to do the actual work required (up to and including a nominating each for FL if it's ready), I'm just seeking consensus here first.

Thank you. ~ Matthewrbowker ^{Drop me a note} 18:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

It might even be redundant. For states, such lists already exist by one name or another. Please see Category:Lists of counties of the United States by state.— Maile (talk) 18:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

@Maile66: I was not aware that existed, thank you for the link. I agree that it could be redundant, so we could turn List of United States counties and county equivalents into an index article and move the information into those pages. ~ Matthewrbowker ^{Drop me a note} 19:02, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

WP:SIZESPLIT says anything over 100KB should be split. I actually am a bit surprised that this huge list was only created in 2013, considering that the state lists have been around a lot longer. I'm not sure what purpose it serves. The size is too large for some browser/users to even pull up to view. The Texas list is already 83,298 bytes in itself, and looks pretty good without any more information moved onto it. Maybe your best path would be creating a formal RFC on the list talk page and get input from a wider community. — Maile (talk) 19:45, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

@Maile66: Noted, thank you for the information. If I don't hear anything here informally soon, I'll open a formal RFC. ~ Matthewrbowker ^{Drop me a note} 00:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

It is also worth noting that this article is top importance: Talk:List of United States counties and county equivalents. That assessment is debatable, if anything we should take Category:Lists of counties of the United States by state entries and up their importance. ~ Matthewrbowker ^{Drop me a note} 23:07, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

We've got US presidential inaugurations listed in the Year articles up to 2001. Perhaps we could relax WP:Recent Years & include them at 2005, 2009, 2013 & 2017 articles. GoodDay (talk) 03:25, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

This would create a parallel discussion. Discuss only at WT:YEARS#US Presidential inaugurations or WT:RY#US inaugurations. Those are independent discussions, in a sense, because the former covers the years through 2001, and the latter covers years after 2001. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

I noticed that there are a lot of WikiProject United States related articles needing assessment under the various -stub categories. I assessed some for Nebraska, all of which had been previously deleted by Favonian. So, I am going to continue assessing some but I would suggest others take a look at these stub categories periodically for new articles that need assessment. I am probably going to get blocked for doing it. Mr. Nosferatu (talk) 16:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Ok, so now that I have looked at 6 different US related projects and see that mutliple people are deleting the subpages I am not going to waste my time. This project is obviously toxic, which is an absolute shame. So good luck. Mr. Nosferatu (talk) 16:24, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

I believe that WikiProject Connecticut should be added to the USA roster, since it is a state, and part of the USA. I would understand if it is not included, since it is a semi-active community.--JJBers (talk) 16:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

JJBers I don't think there would be any objection here. However, because not all states wanted to be a part of this, it was left up to the individual state project to decide that. The person who created the WikiProject United States is no longer active. Did you mention this over at WT:WP Connecticut? I have no idea how active the Connecticut project is. — Maile (talk) 17:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

I have now mentioned it in the talk page, and also WP:CONN is semi-active, as I can tell, but that shouldn't make a difference, since you have Rhode Island WikiProject, which is inactive — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJBers (talk • contribs)

Trying to shove all the small wikiprojects into this one was the goal of one user. He had added many without their desire. And pestered others until they did join. In the end it and other things led to his being banned. WPUS would get too large if all the us based projects joined this one. It was silly of him to try and force that. And really there isn't much of a point of joining them anyway since its is pretty inactive anyways. -DJSasso (talk) 17:40, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

@Djsasso: Alright I get it, I see that it wasn't really a good idea to include all of them, but this is just one, that seems already pretty connected to the wikiproject.--JJBers (talk) 19:56, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

I have no comment on what you were just told. Whatever happened before is water under the bridge, except that the architect of this is not around to advise. Let me say that anyone from the Connecticut project can come to this page and discuss anything about their project. Nobody can restrict that. Nobody has to reply, but nobody can say Connecticut issues cannot be discussed here. If that's what you wanted, no problem. But overall what the bone of contention for individual projects has been is the talk page banner on each article. It's here Template:WikiProject United States. I had nothing to do with the banner, nor whatever bot it might be connected to that adds class ratings to articles. To my memory, projects who chose not to belong to this project didn't want this project's banner on their articles. They wanted to be more independent. So, you can post here anytime you want. Getting an answer to anything is hit and miss, not because it's Connecticut, but because this talk page isn't that active. But as for the banner, that really needs to be a decision for Connecticut to make. To do it without consensus on the Connecticut project would just cause problems down the line. — Maile (talk) 20:33, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

@JJBers, Maile66, and Djsasso: The statements made by Djsasso is not even close to the truth. The contributor who was the main architect in keeping this project going, Kumioko/Reguyla, was banned for criticizing administrator conduct on Wikipedia and was banned for that and remains banned for his refusal to follow a ban from the project he felt was unfair and a violation of site policy. Additionally, they did not pester any of the other projects, they did leave talk page notices as required on each project and let them decide. If there was interest great, if not then that is fine. Several were already completely dead and were added in order to keep them maintained to some level. According to WikiProject Connecticut's talk page history, they declined and were not really bothered further. Some also came back later and asked to be removed and Kumioko removed them as requested, reverted the talk page banners and helped several maintain their templates and projects after that even though they were not associated. So hyperbolic statements that Kumioko pressured projects into joining or stating that is the reason for the ban simply has no basis in truth. Don't take my word for it, go read the ban discussions. There is almost no mention at all about WikiProject United States. And no I am not them, so if you want to block me and accuse me of that because I bothered to read a lot of the history, then that's up to you. Mr. Nosferatu (talk) 16:31, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Except that isn't true. He claimed it was cause he spoke out about admins. However, the original block came from his actions in regards to this project. At which point he blew up and made things worse which then led to the socking and all kinds of crap. And if you notice in my comment, I don't say it was the only reason. I say it and other things. -DJSasso (talk) 12:11, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

@Djsasso: You say I am wrong but I am not seeing what you say in the block logs. I looked at the Kumioko, KumiokoCleanStart and Reguyla accounts. Am I missing something? Because I see an editor that did a hell of a lot for Wikipedia that got burned by a few people in the community and it hurt them deeply no one cared. Now they are banned, with no hope of return and Wikipedia loses tons a day in contributions because of the egos of a few admins..including you it seems. If I could change that, I would, but I can't. Mr. Nosferatu (talk) 02:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

This is absurd. Just wait long enough and Anschluss wikiprojects without discussion? Kumioko was and remains a nuisance to the 'pedia, and this is just useless drama. THIS WAS NEVER AGREED TO BY ANY MEMBER OF WIKIPROJECT CONNECTICUT. -Markvs88 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.179.18.69 (talk) 13:27, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

What is absurd is your hyperbolic statement. Pretty much everyone here agreed that WP connecticut isn't going to be added. I also doubt very seriously that you just randomly stopped by this page out of chance and its more likely you now edit with some other account than your Markvs88 one to avoid scrutiny. I hope no one is fooled by your "random" appearance. Besides that, this project is dead and Kumioko is banned, so you have your wish. Now shoo! Mr. Nosferatu (talk) 03:49, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Mr. Nosferatu, the CT project was listed on the WikiProject United States main page two days ago, thus my ire. I removed it and it was rolled back, and now it's gone again. I've been occasionally lurking for a couple of years now as I don't have much time to edit and I was tired of constantly dealing with Kumioko's constant over-reach. The WPUS anschluss of other projects (and massive tagging of pages for no purpose) was quite real and it is not over-reaching to say so. FWIW, I am not editing under my account because I don't remember my password and it's saved on an old laptop that I rarely turn on anymore. That may change. That said, I'm glad of this outcome and wish you a good day. Best, 47.22.160.194 (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Passwords can be reset so that doesn't seem a strong reason for not replying using your account. Anyway, while I agree with your complaint, I also think the use of the term 'anschluss' as something we should avoid, as its connotations are far more sinister than what happened in the WP US creation/merger. These annexations are much more easily undone if the individual projects desire it. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 15:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

There seems to be a campaign to change "Indian" to "Native American." This is usually a good thing since "Indian" is ambiguous. The problem is that there was at one time an official "Indian Territory", and it has become a target of this campaign. So for example the article on the Sullivan Line, which marked the border between Missouri and Indian Territory, now talks about "Native American territory". This makes it sound like some vague geographic area in which Native Americans lived, not an actual territory with borders designated by the US government.

Another problem with this is that the term "Native American" meant something completely different in the 19th century.

I'm tempted to change some of these but don't want to be accused of being culturally insensitive. Opinions? Kendall-K1 (talk) 00:59, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

The Indian Territory article you have linked refers to the official government designation of a geographical area of Oklahoma. That was what the government of the United States designated it in its official paperwork. In that regard, it should be left as the government documents say it was. Maps of Indian Territory - National Archives. Indian Territory - Oklahoma Historical Society. If the state of Oklahoma and the federal US government haven't changed it, neither should any editor. I'm not familiar with the Sullivan Line, but I'd say that it also depends on what the government designations were, and are currently. Not sure if that helps. — Maile (talk) 01:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

And p.s., "native American" (not capped) meant something else in the first half of 20th century as well. It's only been around the 1960s or later that Native American came to mean those who used to be called Indians. Before that, "native American" meant you were born on American soil. Like "native New Yorker" or "native Texan". — Maile (talk) 01:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

For the decades I lived in the city of Cambridge, it was always in Middlesex County. Not sure where to report the omission from the Commonwealth's wiki page on Middlesex? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ladyj88 (talk • contribs) 19:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

I see it on Middlesex County, Massachusetts under the Communities section. — Maile (talk) 20:00, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

As of right now ref No. 2 of the article about FDR's first Inaugural Address (1933) - a link to the full text provided by the U.S. Senate website - constitutes a dead link. The present URL for that document is http://www.inaugural.senate.gov/about/past-inaugural-ceremonies/37th-inaugural-ceremonies . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.188.189.176 (talk) 11:56, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for providing the update. I inserted it. — Maile (talk) 20:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Please provide input on the RfC at the talk page of United States Senate election in South Dakota, 2016. This issue has been unresolved since Summer 2016 and requires community input. -- Dane2007 ^talk 01:11, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Greetings WikiProject United States/Archive 11 Members!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

• Fix and improve Mr.Z-bot's popular pages report

If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.

Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 18:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Can anyone point me towards an established policy on when to add the next cabinet nominees to secretary articles (like Secretary of HHS) and current cabinet member articles as the successor? I've noticed they are being added uniformly as designee, however, that practice strikes me as odd considering it's not a forgone conclusion that the names the President elect puts forth will actually become secretary. I believe Obama had a few nominees withdraw before the Senate hearings. Thanks! Knope7 (talk) 01:00, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

In the article History of Pinckney island there is a reference to an Alexander Mackay who has the first white settler. The link on Mackay's name takes you to a fur trader that lived in Canada. I think this is the wrong Mackay. the references I have found are for an Colonel alexander mackey who lived in SC.24.211.101.35 (talk) 01:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)Biography of an Island, by Merrill G. Christophersen.

Thanks, it is fixed now (there is no wikipedia page for the correct Mackay, I think). Smmurphy^(Talk) 01:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

G'day everyone, please be advised that the George H. W. Bush article has been nominated for a community re-assessment of its compliance with the Good Article criteria. The article has been nominated for this review since March 2016, but the discussion has stagnated due to lack of participants. If a few interested parties get involved either to edit the article, or join the discussion, a consensus should hopefully be able to be established either to keep or delist the article. The review page can be found here: Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/George H. W. Bush/1. Thank you for your time. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jennifer Lawrence/archive1 is open. Hoping to gain input. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

This article - American influence in the Honduran general election, 2009 - which is within the scope of this project, is being considered for deletion. Sagecandor (talk) 08:40, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Per similar notice placed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Central_America#American_influence_in_the_Honduran_general_election.2C_2009, with edit [1]. Sagecandor (talk) 08:40, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Please see here. Thank you. --Jayron32 21:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Many of the Template:United States elections templates are incredibly incorrect. For example, on Template:United States elections, 1982, North Dakota is listed as having a gubernatorial election that year, while it actually had one in 1980 and 1984. New Mexico is not listed as having one that year, while it did. New Mexico is also incorrectly listed on Template:United States elections, 1984. MB298 (talk) 22:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Will editors here weigh in on a dispute about the definition of WP:NPOV and its relation to article titles and article content? It's now an RfC; see Talk:Death of JonBenét Ramsey#RfC: Is use of murder in the text, or use of murder categories, within the article against the WP:NPOV policy?. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

In case anyone has input on whether the upcoming inauguration should be mentioned on the main page: Wikipedia talk:In the news/Recurring items#United States Presidential inauguration. - Brianhe (talk) 00:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

I invite you to the ongoing RM discussion. --George Ho (talk) 03:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Usage of File:Treehouse of Horror.png has been under discussion since June. I invite you to the ongoing FFD discussion. --George Ho (talk) 01:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Would someone used to parsing geographic sources please have a look at United States Minor Outlying Islands. The infobox is showing an error, "Population Density: [convert: invalid number]" due to use of "n/a" in the wikitext. Ref 1 is a large pdf where Table 1 says the population in 2000 was 315+1=316 (agreeing with article), and the total area was 16.00 square miles (article says 13 sq mi). The article has too many fields set in the infobox. For example, it has population_census and population_estimate. Also, area_km2 and area_sq_mi. The many n/a should be removed, and the comments saying "Do not remove per WP:MOSNUM" seem to be misplaced. I'm hoping someone used to articles like this will fix the problems. Johnuniq (talk) 10:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikimedia DC has received a grant to facilitate a contest about women. The meetup page (to be created) will have more information, but here are a few particulars. --Rosiestep (talk) 21:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

• When: April 1-30, 2017
• Grant: US$1,250
• Format: Destubathon Plus (to be clarified)
• Geo scope: US 50 states, plus DC, PR, and Guam
• Focus: US women
• Type: contest+campaign... it's a contest with prizes for those who want to participate in a contest, and it's a campaign if you want to participate in the event but don't want to compete for a prize.

Heavens to Mergatroid, I just wanted to bring notice to what appears to be a questionable link on a Wiki page. It's amazing how much schlock one has to go through to attempt to get someone's notice.

I'm a Brett Favre fan, US football. I looked up Kiln, Mississippi ... which is his hometown ... and found an external link that doesn't seem to fit.

So: Kiln, Mississippi, USA

At the bottom of the page, External links: Anglo American Lightning Organisation, returning to flight XS422, the former ETPS Lightning at Stennis Airport, Kiln, Mississippi

Note the spelling of Organisation: UK not USA.

Everything on the link's website appears to be United Kingdom, not Mississippi.

Thought someone might want to look into it, at least. Maybe I'm wrong and it fits, but it doesn't seem to.

I've donated to wiki a couple of times, as finances permitted. This enduring part-time economy truly sucks, pardon my French. (How did that get started, referring to "French" when cussing?)

Thank you for your time, and efforts if you see fit.

barbara — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:98A:1:5B7C:C5B3:9C8D:B38D:C9C8 (talk) 07:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Imzadi1979 has already taken care of it. Thanks for letting folks know. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi! Can someone please add census data to Dove Valley, Colorado and Central, Louisiana? These incorporated places don't have their 2010 Census data.

Thanks! WhisperToMe (talk) 08:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Somewhat a novice to Wiki editing/contribution but:

My understanding is that Cassius Marcellus Clay during his time in Russia encountered a situation where he was challenged to a duel because he was seen as 'womanizing' at a formal gathering.

Cassius Marcellus Clay did not adhere to protocol and punched the gentleman right then and there.

If this incident can be vouched accurate and included in the article for Cassius Marcellus Clay, it would shed light on the diplomatic challenges of that era, and be a relevant adjunct to Cassius Clay//Mohammed Ali's Wiki Article.

I will try to find the citation that originated this 'understanding' but if some other contributor has already gone through trying to get it included I would appreciate knowing that.

Eitienne (talk) 11:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Have you tried asking your question on the article talk page Talk:Muhammad Ali? Editors interested in the Muhammad Ali article are more likely to see it there. Also, if you would like the incident to be included in the article, finding reliable sources which support your point would help. Knope7 (talk) 18:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Gowanus Canal, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. epicgenius (talk) 00:59, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

In reading the article about the Amphitheater named for Carter Barron, it states that he died from cancer: ^[1]

^[2] This appears to be derived from a National Park Service brochure on the Amphitheater, as it is noted that this doc is referenced in the Wiki entry. There is a link to the NPS doc in the references at the bottom of the amphitheater entry.

On the separate Wikipedia bio entry of Carter Barron: ^[3] there is a footnote reference to his morning in the Georgia Tech newsletter: ^[4]

In that newsletter article, it states that he died from a cerebral hemorrhage.

Not sure how to resolve this, but thought it was worthy of note.

71.121.243.214 (talk) 16:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Maury

Whiskey Rebellion was nominated for a WP:GA by a user who hasn't been participating in the Review so far. I cannot fix any of the issues that have come up with in my Review because that would, of course, be a WP:COI. Am hoping that a WikiProject United States participant would be willing to step in and fix this article up so we can work together and I can then complete my Review. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 05:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

@Shearonink and BlueMoonset: It would probably be more appropriate to post on WT:GAN. But since you're posting here, I'm pinging BlueMoonset and asking the question if this nomination should be withdrawn. The GAC instructions say Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination. The reviewer will be making suggestions to improve the article to GA quality during the review process; therefore, the review will require your involvement as nominator. Before nominating an article, ensure that you will be able to respond to these comments in a timely manner. The revision history stats indicate that nominator Barbara (WVS) has not made any edits at all on this article. And in fact, there have been such a wide variety of editors, I'm not sure who would have sufficient knowledge to assist you. — Maile (talk) 21:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

I posted here because a GA Review seemed like something one of the WIkiProjects enumerated on the article's talkpage should know about (posting notices on the various WikiProjects that are not moribund to see if someone could work with me on the Review process). Makes sense though about GAN. I understand re: the Nom'ing parameters but kind of seems like a Catch-22 if this article doesn't receive a full GA Review because so many editors have worked on it... Shearonink (talk) 21:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Shearonink, in the absence of a reply from the nominator, and you're hoping for someone to work on the article, possible venues are one of the related WikiProjects (as here) or the GAN talk page (as noted by Maile). For someone wishing to nominate an article they haven't worked on, it isn't really a Catch-22: so long as you post to the article talk page asking whether anyone has objections to you nominating and wait the standard seven days, if no one objects you're all set, though you need to be willing to work on the article when a reviewer comes along.

I've just posted to the nominator's page, letting her know that she should be in touch as to whether she plans to work on the review. (I also appended the same material that Maile did above.) If she doesn't plan to work on it, or doesn't respond in a timely fashion, it probably makes sense to close the review unless you get a volunteer from this post. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:22, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Of the WikiProjects listed on the article's talkpage I posted to the 2 viable WikiProjects - this one and Military history. WikiProject Pittsburgh, WIkiProject Pennsylvania, and WikiProject United States History are all moribund/"semi-active". It's a shame, there's a lot of good content in the article - hate to even think about closing the Review but yeah...am hoping a volunteer will be willing to work through the article's present issues and get it to a possible GA status. Thanks for chiming in User talk:BlueMoonset and User:Maile66. Shearonink (talk) 00:31, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Military History project is your best chance of finding help on this one. Good luck. — Maile (talk) 00:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

There is an article at AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifespan timeline of Prime Ministers of Singapore which is similar to Lifespan timeline of Presidents of the United States. It would be helpful if people can contribute and discuss whether these are kind of articles are encyclopaedic. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

You may want to participate in this RfC regarding the inclusion of candidates in election infoboxes. MB298 (talk) 02:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Greetings! I have recently relisted a requested move discussion at George Washington's Farewell Address#Requested move 30 January 2017, regarding a page relating to this WikiProject. Discussion and opinions are invited. Thanks, SkyWarrior 03:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Since the United States as dropped it's ability to maintain a universal academic grading system that allows every state within North America to compare apples to apples (educational progress or lack of) for all elementary schools/students educational progress, then how is one to know where their successes and failures are? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.191.33.255 (talk) 10:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

What? This isn't Facebook...(hehe) —JJBers 06:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Judging by the IP's grammar ability, the Greater Los Angeles area's educational system has produced at least one failure. :) - BilCat (talk) 08:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

The redirect, Democrat Party (United States), is relisted. I invite you to comment. --George Ho (talk) 01:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

I started Draft:March 4 Trump, if any project members want to help expand this draft as things develop. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

The List of Social Security legislation could use some updating. The most recent item is from 2000, but there's been quite a bit of legislation related to Social Security since then. Nosecohn (talk) 03:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

As part of the Inspire campaign that Wikimedia is currently running, I've proposed a partnership between Wikimedia and the Federal Register to help improve content relating to the Federal Government. I would greatly appreciate any feedback on my proposal: Partner with the U.S. Federal Register to help improve U.S. Government content. Thank you. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 00:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Executive Order 13769 has thrown into light that there is currently a gap when it comes to infoboxes for Executive Orders and other Presidential Documents. I have started work at User:Sasuke Sarutobi/Template:Infobox U.S. Presidential Document, so will be grateful for any and all feedback. Thank you — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 12:24, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

This is now live at Template:Infobox U.S. Presidential Document. Feedback is still very much appreciated! — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 13:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Ive seen that there is a useful Category:Federal law enforcement agencies of the United States.

I think, there should be a parallel category called Federal research agencies of the United States.

What do people think ?--Wuerzele (talk) 13:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

If you can find multiple pages that would be relevant, then go for it!

Out of interest, what would be your criteria for inclusion? Would DARPA or NASA be included? By extension, would Category:United States Department of Defense agencies or Category:NASA? — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 13:29, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Support - You don't really have to ask permission so be bold! Best Regards,   Bfpage  _{let's talk...}  20:50, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

• Historic houses in Missouri
• Historic houses in Nebraska
• Historic houses in Virginia

Pls rename these pages to add the "List of" at the start per naming conventions on lists. 103.6.159.71 (talk) 06:44, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

I was hesitant as to whether it's too soon for coverage of this group, but they've been around at least a few months, and are getting some news coverage this week for Saturday's rumble with anti-fa in Berkeley. So I've launched a stub to see if it attracts more content, and/or if the group continues to draw press. MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:38, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm trying to expand and update the Maritz, LLC Wikipedia article on behalf of Maritz Holdings, Inc., which is based in Missouri. More specifically, I am hoping to find neutral editors to review the "Corporate overview", "Current subsidiaries", and/or "Former subsidiaries" sections proposed here. As I mentioned in the edit request, I realize this is a lot of content to review, and I am fine with separating this request into multiple requests for each section, if preferred. This request is not to change existing text but to expand information about the company's overall structure and subsidiaries. All of the information is sourced, and I've made neutrality a top priority. I can answer questions on my talk page or within the edit request on the article's talk page. Thanks for any help in advance. MadisonfromStanding (talk) 15:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Please see Talk:Buffalo–Niagara_Falls_metropolitan_area#RfC_about_the_3_separate_regional_articles. This could use a few more responses. Thank you. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

I think Luther Olson should be added to the Grand Forks Central High School Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.17.43.240 (talk) 18:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

The article for "Nasty woman" has been nominated for deletion. Project members are invited to participate in the AfD discussion here, if interested: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasty woman. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 03:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bats_of_the_United_States is missing the Pallid Bat (Antrozous pallidus), which is quite common in western US — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.164.204.39 (talk) 15:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cooperatives#Cooperatives in the United States.

Thank you!

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Dear Wikimedians,

We would like to draw your attention to the newly launched Netherlands and the World Exchange Platform. Dutch cultural heritage institutions have large collections on non-European countries such as Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Brazil, Ghana, Suriname, South Africa, and others. The Netherlands and the World Exchange Platform aims to make these collections available to the Wikimedia community.

Key properties are: (1) Dutch heritage institutions can post (parts of) their collections that are relevant to non-European countries; and (2) Wikimedia contributors can make requests for specific materials.

Recent postings include material on North America, which may be of particular interest to your language community.

Feel free to browse the platform. See the Help page for information on how to use the platform. We welcome any suggestions or comments here or on the project page of The Netherlands and the World! Best, AWossink (talk) 12:43, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

I started another RfC discussion Talk:Cold War II#RfC: "Novel risks and measures for preventing escalation" section earlier this month. I invite you to comment there. --George Ho (talk) 05:42, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

The discussion is recently relisted. George Ho (talk) 06:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

There seems to be some problem on the assessment request page. The last several requests are completed and properly marked with the {{Done}} template when viewed in edit mode, but the  Done is not rendering when the page is viewed. Well outside my expertise. Help! John from Idegon (talk) 02:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

There are comments relevant to the project concerning article "class assessment" at Talk:USS Indianapolis (CA-35)#Article assessment. Otr500 (talk) 02:43, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

There is an article called "southern United States" in Wikipedia; if you go the article on Alabama and click on "southeastern region" you could taken to "southern United States". As the talk page on southern United States implies, one cannot equate "southern" and "southeastern" U.S.A.. I think this requires a clean-up. I have avoided using wikilinks in this plea, as they are not working on this computer! I shall appreciate any help in this matter. 81.140.1.129 (talk) 16:39, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

I have just created a new article titled International Boundary Commission, about the commission that maintains boundary markers on the boundary between the United States and Canada. It could use more work. In particular, perhaps some additional other articles should link to it. Michael Hardy (talk) 19:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that Corruption in the United States, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

Members of this WikiProject might be interested in a proposal I've started here. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

You are invited to participate in the upcoming "420 collaboration", which is being held from Saturday, April 15 to Sunday, April 30, and especially on April 20, 2017! The purpose of the collaboration, which is being organized by WikiProject Cannabis, is to create and improve cannabis-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects in a variety of fields, including: culture, health, hemp, history, medicine, politics, and religion. WikiProject United States participants may be particularly interested in the following: Cannabis in the United States (Category:Cannabis in the United States). For more information about this campaign, and to learn how you can help improve Wikipedia, please visit the "420 collaboration" page.

---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:35, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Will a knowledgeable editor be able to help close the move of Donald Trump's disclosure of classified information to Russia? This will help an unsightly lead tag in the article to be removed. (The move was completed). Thanks—OhioOakTree (talk) 02:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello! I have nominated the article about True Detective's first season as a featured article candidate. Feedback and comments would be greatly appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/True Detective (season 1)/archive5. Thank you for your time and consideration. DAP 💅 5:39, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Please see Talk:American ethnicity #Requested move 16 April 2017--Moxy (talk) 08:09, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello, project members. I'm hoping I can get some additional feedback on a draft I recently submitted to AfC. Full disclosure: This draft article for James F. Allen, who serves as chairman of Hard Rock International and CEO of Seminole Gaming and has led the Seminole Tribe of Florida's gaming operations since 2001, was written on his behalf and as part of my work with Beutler Ink.

The draft was declined by User:SwisterTwister for being "Too suggestive of an advertised business profile for clients, notability cannot be inherited from others and the sources are largely consisting of simple announcements, local business journals, notices and similar." I posted a reply on the draft's talk page, and received a response in the form of an additional AfC comment that said the sources were "not significant weight-ful of notability, including because they include local business publications and similar". I'm not entirely sure what this means because I thought the sources used are considered major publications (for example, Forbes and The Press of Atlantic City); it would be helpful to get editors from here to take a look and point me in the right direction, or help confirm notability. My goal remains to have the draft deemed accurate and neutral, and moved into the main space.

I appreciate the AfC process and SwisterTwister's review of the draft, but this process has not really provided specific ways to improve the draft, so I'm casting a wider net and reaching out to people who may be 'watchlisting' this page for additional input. I've posted similar requests for feedback at WikiProject Biography, and on the Hard Rock Cafe and Seminole Tribe of Florida talk pages, but so far no one has responded. Is there anyone who is willing to review this draft and provide additional feedback? Thanks in advance for any help. Inkian Jason (talk) 17:49, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

I am marking this section as 'resolved' since the article has been moved into the main space. Thanks! Inkian Jason (talk) 19:42, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

		Welcome to Women in Red's May 2017 worldwide online editathons. Participation is welcome in any language.
		"Organizations" "Sports" "Pacific islanders"

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 10:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

It was created from a merge of List of monuments dedicated to George Washington and List of places named for George Washington. Would welcome opinions - pro/con/whatever - at Talk:List of memorials to George Washington. Thanks. Shearonink (talk) 03:12, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Project members are invited to help expand the 2017 May Day protests article. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:24, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Emmett Till#RfC: Should we include the "accused of showing an interest in a white woman" aspect in the lead or specifically the lead sentence?. A WP:Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello! I'm looking for editors who might be interested in helping me update the Congressional Institute article, which falls under the scope of this project. I have drafted an updated and expanded article on behalf of the Institute as part of my work with Beutler Ink. Editors can review that draft here. There are more detailed notes about my draft in a Talk page note here. Due to my COI I won't edit the article directly, so I'm looking for neutral editors to review this draft. Thanks! Heatherer (talk) 18:03, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Anyone happen to know the difference between Category:Lists of American people by educational affiliation and Category:Lists of people by university or college in the United States. I started to create a couple state groupings under the latter, then realized what appears to be an overlap. Not sure what one adds over the other, but both see quite a lot of use, it seems. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 20:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

I would suggest we ask BrownHairedGirl who created Category:Lists of American people by educational affiliation in 2013. Or ask Cydebot who created the other one in 2012. — Maile (talk) 20:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

@Maile66 and Rhododendrites: sorry for the slow reply.

The difference is simple: one is subset of the other.

Category:Lists of American people by educational affiliation includes all lists of people by educational affiliation. The sub-cat Category:Lists of people by university or college in the United States contains only unis and colleges, but not (for example) high schools.

Per WP:SUBCAT, an article should be in the most specific appropriate category, and not (with rare exceptions) in its parent.

So in this case, Rhododendrites has created Category:Lists of people by university or college in Ohio, and correctly made it a subcat of Category:Lists of people by educational affiliation in Ohio. I just moved ll the universities into the subcat. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:27, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that Yolanda Saldívar, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 15 May 2017 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

Hello, Please note that Yolanda Saldívar, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 15 May 2017 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

The name of the current mayor is Stephanie Irwin and should replace Roger Williams who has not been the mayor for quite some time. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.131.20.60 (talk) 22:14, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

This refers to Pinetop-Lakeside, Arizona. I'll look into it.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 14:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/Archive 11/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject United States.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

• The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
• The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
• The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject United States, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I was wondering if I could receive input about the inclusion of an Electoral history section on the article of a politician, particularly one that has been elected more than once, but not enough times to merit a standalone article (e.g. "Electoral history of..."). I was looking at Featured Articles of politicians, such as Ernie Fletcher and Paul Patton, neither of which has an Electoral history section, while I've also found Electoral history sections on other Governor's articles, such as Doug Ducey. Are there any guidelines that indicate Electoral history sections would be beneficial to an article, or is it traditionally not included? As the two articles I mentioned that are FA status do not have such a section. Calibrador (talk) 22:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I don't know who would respond to this or how anyone would respond, but I guess the question should be asked here.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 14:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

 Done on the page linked. It's a manual task, one editor at a time, one article at a time, and up to individual perception by the editor who carries it out on any individual article. — Maile (talk) 11:39, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Project members are invited to participate in this discussion re: the naming of subcategories in Category:Confederate States of America monuments and memorials. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:52, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

add Robert Fornaro, CEO Spirit Airlines — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:1C03:41CD:E2B3:6688:DABF:FF78 (talk) 18:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

 Done Although, it is not a protected article, and anyone could have added Fornaro. — Maile (talk) 19:47, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi! Because Texas law does not distinguish between cities, towns, and villages, I am proposing a redoing of the templates for populated places by county here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Texas#Templates_of_municipalities_by_county:_consolidate_the_.22city.22.2C_.22town.22.2C_and_.22village.22_fields_into_.22municipalities.22.3F

WhisperToMe (talk) 14:54, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

WhisperToMe If Texas did this, perhaps other states did it also. Just thinking here of how this might impact the MOS, or anything else, if it's more than just Texas. Would you eventually be requesting a bot for that purpose? Would this also be discussed at one of the Village Pumps, or the Centralized discussion? — Maile (talk) 15:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

@Maile66: I probably would request a bot: whichever way is easiest is the way I'd do it. Anyway such decisions should be made on a state-by-state basis. As for the MOS it should probably state that in the lead that each municipality should be called by its legal designation and not necessarily the superficial "type name" (in Texas a designation of "city," "town," or "village" is just cosmetic and has no legal basis) WhisperToMe (talk) 15:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Plot to Hack America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Plot to Hack America until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sagecandor (talk) 17:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello WP:USA, a bot request regarding updating state population data is currently open at: Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/CensusBot#Discussion, your input to the review would be welcome. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 14:36, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

The ongoing RM discussion at Template talk:2016 US Election AE is relisted, so feel free to comment there until closure. --George Ho (talk) 01:12, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

June 20, 2017 Hello, At the National Register of Historic Places Listings in Morrow County Ohio webpage, I found broken links. When you click on the "Name of the Register"  is when I found the broken links at the following  webpage: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Register_of_Historic_Places_listings_in_Morrow_County,_Ohio    When you click on the name, it takes you to Wikipedia where you can read more Info about it. The following Registered Names has an error that takes you to Wikipedia that reads, "Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name" and you cannot read anything more about it.  These links worked correctly just a few days ago, now they don't.      These Registered Names I'm referring too are: Reuben Benedict House, Samuel P Brown House, Floral House, Jarvis House, Enos Miles House, Old Bartlett and Global Store, A.B. Sears House, U.S. Post Office, Wood Commercial Building, and the Exchange Hotel When you click on the photos, those links works find... but it's when you click on the names that it doesn't work. Can you correct these broken links? Awaiting Reply, Treehouse726 (talk) 20:33, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

That's because those articles haven't been created yet. Redlinks are there to remind Wikipedia editors that these articles need to be created. Please see Wikipedia:Red link. — Maile (talk) 20:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

RfC about the author credits of first edition in first sentence in a book article.

Please see Request for Comment, at Talk:Trump_Tower:_A_Novel#RfC_about_the_author_credits_of_first_edition_in_first_sentence. Sagecandor (talk) 19:01, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

It was changed recently. I understand, officially, that "Some versions of the University seal feature a fluted edge. However, the current version with a clean, smooth edge is preferred." and that is why it was changed, but why is it black & white? The visual standards neglects to state this preference.

http://visualeditorialstandards.psu.edu/graphic-identity-system/university-seal/

Here is a version in blue & white:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/fa/5/5c/Pennsylvania_State_University_seal.svg

Just wondering. Sorry if this post is improperly formatted; I'm relatively new to editing Wikipedia.

Regards, Class of '17 alum — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.111.204.62 (talk) 14:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Folks,

Could not find any mention of NAS Roosevelt Roads on any of the listings...active or otherwise. When the bombing range on Vieques was closed down would have to assume that Roosy Roads was no longer of use so it probably was abandoned but thought it still worth listing in the former naval air stations.

Had some great times there supporting Marine fighter squadrons there in the 1950's. Did manage to put one FJ-2 in the weeds over the overrun when he missed the Morest gear cable

Regards,

Bill Schultz (FNP) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.161.177.196 (talk) 06:46, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello. I opened the discussion about the opening sentence of "Breitbart News" at "Talk:Breitbart News#Reinsert "described as" in opening sentence?". Join in. --George Ho (talk) 17:04, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

There is a request for Jennifer Lawrence to be featured on the main page for her upcoming birthday on August 15th. See Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Jennifer Lawrence for more. Would prefer responses sooner rather than later. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi all

This is a heads up to let you know that there is a requested move, proposing to move the New York (disambiguation) page to New York, and the current New York page to New York (state). Please go to Talk:New York (disambiguation), read through the request and give your thoughts and feedback in the discussion. Thanks!  — Amakuru (talk) 11:54, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

The article Operation Rat Killer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced material

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BSOleader (talk) 17:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

• Transportation safety in the United States might be split with an article for road traffic fatalities which is the topic which generate most transport fatalities, and keeping Transportation safety in the United States as a second article for generates Transportation safety issues not specifically linked to road traffic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.193.104.227 (talk) 12:00, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elijah Daniel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elijah Daniel (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sagecandor (talk) 04:22, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Rat Killer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Rat Killer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BSOleader (talk) 13:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

There is an ongoing Request for Comment about the introduction to the article Whataboutism.

You may comment if you wish, at Talk:Whataboutism#RfC:_Introduction_to_the_subject. Sagecandor (talk) 17:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello! There is currently a dispute at Simone Manuel, an article under this WikiProject's scope, regarding the statement that Manuel is the first black woman to win a swimming gold in an individual event and whether or not Ranomi Kromowidjojo's racial background renders this statement incorrect for Manuel. Other editors are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Simone Manuel#Simone Manuel, the first black woman to win a gold medal? ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 22:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Project members are invited to participate in this discussion over whether or not the Impeachment March article should be merged into Efforts to impeach Donald Trump. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Just wonder if there is any template or program in the project to recruit newcomers or new editors to join the project? Bobo.03 (talk) 18:09, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

@Bobo.03: Honestly doing anything for this project is like handling plutonium. I stopped editing this project when Kumioko got banned and Wikipedia a short time later. He was trying to improve Wikipedia and did a hell of a job doing it and got run out of here for his efforts by people who largely just want to push POV. I would recommend letting this project die and mark it and all the others its associated to as inactive. 73.109.57.27 (talk) 13:43, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

I am sorry to hear that, but still hope things will pass and it would get better over time.. Bobo.03 (talk) 15:42, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

It's actually getting worse over time. 73.109.56.143 (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Us Tareyton smokers would rather fight than switch!, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:58, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

		Women in Red is pleased to introduce... A new initiative for worldwide online coverage: #1day1woman
		Create articles on any day of any month Cover women and their works in any field of interest Feel free to add articles in other languages, too Social media hashtag campaign: #1day1woman (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 10:54, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

The "Group of Two", the proposed special relationship between US and China, was recently added into Cold War II#See also. It is discussed at Talk:Cold War II#Group of Two in "See also" section. --George Ho (talk) 06:15, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

I have listed the discussion as RfC discussion. --George Ho (talk) 06:28, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

I started an RfC discussion at Talk:Cold War II about "EU and NATO members vs. Russia" section. I invite you to discuss it there. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 14:15, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello,

This is a source giving data on how many people visit the park annually ^[1]

Thanks, Gabby T Tayl7205 (talk) 00:05, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

I've made a proposal to have "adult" removed from the opening sentence of Family Guy at Talk:Family Guy#RfC: Remove "adult" as a descriptor from the opening sentence. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 13:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

If other editors are interested in helping, I've created many redirects to this page: List of monuments and memorials of the Confederate States of America. It would be really helpful to create stubs for many of these entries, especially given the ongoing debate in the U.S. re: Confederate memorials and monuments. I invite all to help with this effort. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:57, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

You can view a list of redirects (therefore, possibly missing Wikipedia articles) here: Talk:List_of_monuments_and_memorials_of_the_Confederate_States_of_America#Articles_to_create. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:24, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello! I'm an employee of The Doe Run Company and I'm here on behalf of the company. Continuing my work to update the Wikipedia article, I have saved an expanded and updated draft here, and posted an edit request on the article's talk page. My goals are to correct inaccuracies, source all content, and provide a more thorough overview of the company's operations, among others outlined in more detail in the edit request. I have posted similar requests for help at WikiProjects Mining and Missouri (since the company is based in St. Louis), but so far I've seen no replies to the proposed changes. Would someone from WikiProject United States be able to help with this request? TS at Doe Run (talk) 12:24, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Definitions of whiteness in the United States#Jewish material. A WP:Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

A merge proposal was started from a consensus on the article talk page of Alt-left, which is an article within the scope of this WikiProject.--Mark Miller (talk) 20:55, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, all. Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Uma Thurman#Request for comment. A permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:42, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Project members are invited to create and expand articles about individual statues within the National Statuary Hall Collection. See the following link for discussion: Talk:National_Statuary_Hall_Collection#Standalone_article_for_each_sculpture. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that Pond hockey, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 11 September 2017 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

Dear Participants of WikiProject United States,
Thank you for your efforts and contribution of Wikipedia.
It is topic about Diplomacy or military option of U.S. to North Korea nuclear issue
Please refer to this Invitation to AfD and let us know your opinion for this article whether it should be "Keep", "Delete", "Merge", "Redirect", or other view Comment
on the top page of Peace Treaty with North Korea, please click the link this article's entry for your valuable opinion.

• Reference link : Wikietiquette about AfD ^[1]

Goodtiming8871 (talk) 09:51, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Plano shooting

Harizotoh9 (talk) 00:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

There's an RFC about whether Wikipedia should mention anywhere that the potential firing of FBI Director Comey was publicly discussed by both Democratic and Republican politicians before Trump fired him. Anythingyouwant (talk) 16:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Any input from this WikiProject's members at this discussion about the naming of American state cuisine categories would be much appreciated! -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 19:26, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Input from uninvolved, experienced editors is requested at a discussion at Talk:Patriot Prayer#Chapman. The discussion thread includes a couple of separate discussions; but opinions are sought particularly as to whether the article subject should be described as "American", "USA-based" or otherwise. Thanks in advance for any comment. - Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 20:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

On behalf of Pitney Bowes, I've proposed an expanded and updated article as part of my work at Beutler Ink. I've saved my draft in full here, and submitted an edit request at Talk:Pitney Bowes to update the infobox and add the proposed "Overview" section.

Given my conflict of interest, I will not edit the article directly and seek uninvolved editors to review the draft for accuracy, neutrality, and verifiability. I will be submitting additional edit requests to address the article's other sections later, but for now I'm wondering if a WikiProject United States member may be willing to help with this first request? Thank you, Inkian Jason (talk) 15:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on American women during this month please sign up in the participants section. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles for your project please add them to the appropriarte list by continent at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:54, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

The article United States Trotting Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable subject and fails to provide and references and is not at all integrated or conncected to other parts of the encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Theprussian (talk) 17:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Democratic–Republican Party#Hyphen or Dash?. —GoldRingChip 13:04, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Members of this WikiProject might be interested in leaving comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Lady Gaga/archive2. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

...was a German gramarian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RCNesland. RCNesland (talk) 17:04, 6 November 2017 (UTC) (talk • contribs) 17:00, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Tags have been placed on:

• Template:WikiProject Cape Cod and the Islands
• Template:WikiProject Louisville
• Template:WikiProject Lowell, Massachusetts
• Template:WikiProject Omaha
• Template:WikiProject Shreveport
• Template:WikiProject Texas Tech University
• Template:WikiProject U.S. Presidents
• Template:WikiProject United States presidential elections

requesting they be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because they are an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. Such templates may be deleted after being tagged for seven days. See the notices on the templates for further details. - Evad37 [talk] 00:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

---

Note that there are several others in Category:Deprecated templates from September 2011 which have only a few transclusisons. - Evad37 [talk] 00:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

I just moved Laura (1835 steamboat) (stub) into main space and rated the article as a stub with low importance. I posted templates for the following WikiProjects on the talk page: Houston, Ships, and Texas. I forgot that the Texas template loads a raft of categories for the United States. When this steamboat was in use, between 1835 and 1840, Texas was an independent republic. Should I just remove the Texas template, or have I set off some automated chain of events? Please advise. Thank you, Oldsanfelipe (talk) 18:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanksgiving (United States)#Sports has no references, meaning that the article currently is ineligible for inclusion on the Main Page as part of WP:Selected anniversaries. Please consider improving this section in the next day or two. Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 18:54, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

I was wondering if anyone would be willing to help with the drafts at User:Happyweekdays/Chinese students in the United States and User:Happyweekdays/Chinese faculty in U.S. I think that this could be a good topic on Wikipedia in general considering how many Chinese people are coming to the United States for education and/or to serve as educators, enough to where it would warrant its own article. Currently the student who is working on these topics (Happyweekdays) has students and faculty in two different articles, but I don't know if they could be merged into one article. Any help with this as far as advice or edits would be much appreciated! (Posted to multiple areas in order to hopefully get more and a variety of responses.) Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

There is an ongoing move request for the African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954–1968) and similar pages. Please feel free to comment at the move request page. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 15:40, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

It seems the category is watched by almost no one. I am notifying here to establish a criteria of the category on Category talk:People banned from entering the United States#Criteria, presently the criteria is confusing. Capitals00 (talk) 16:40, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Today, there was mass removal of aircraft images from List of United States bomber aircraft. I have started a discussion about this on that article's talk page here. Thanks - ^theWOLFchild 22:11, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia has many thousands of wikilinks which point to disambiguation pages. It would be useful to readers if these links directed them to the specific pages of interest, rather than making them search through a list. Members of WikiProject Disambiguation have been working on this and the total number is now below 20,000 for the first time. Some of these links require specialist knowledge of the topics concerned and therefore it would be great if you could help in your area of expertise.

A list of the relevant links on pages which fall within the remit of this wikiproject can be found at http://69.142.160.183/~dispenser/cgi-bin/topic_points.py?banner=WikiProject_United_States

Please take a few minutes to help make these more useful to our readers.— Rod ^talk 12:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

A discussion has been started regarding the factual accuracy of some of the information in this article. Your input is requested here. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 16:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

You are invited to comment at Talk:Cary Grant where there's an ongoing RfC on the inclusion of an infobox. jcc (tea and biscuits) 18:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

I started the WP:WikiProject United States Coast Guard Auxiliary and I am having difficulty with finding new members to contribute to pages pertaining to the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary.

I am of the opinion that the creation of the following articles would be beneficial: History of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary, Notable United States Coast Guard Auxiliarists, Awards and decorations of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary, United States Coast Guard Auxiliary Interpreter Corps, Director of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary, United States Coast Guard Auxiliary National Commodore, Missions of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary, United States Coast Guard Auxiliary National Executive Committee, and the Coast Guard Auxiliary Association.

Expansion/improvements to these pages:United States Coast Guard Auxiliary and Uniforms of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary would also help.

Any assistance to support this project will be greatly appreciated. COASTIE I am (talk) 13:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

A few more editors are needed to complete the A-Class review for Brilliant Pebbles; please stop by and help review the article! Thanks! AustralianRupert (talk) 08:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

1st Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (United States), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 16:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Would someone be willing to complete it (it was created a while back unfinished and the creator has been unresponsive). MB298 (talk) 09:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Project member are invited to help expand the newly-created Cole Memorandum article. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Greetings! I have recently relisted a requested move discussion at Talk:2017 Washington train derailment#Requested move 21 December 2017, regarding a page related to this WikiProject. Your opinion and rationale are needed so a decision can be made. Thank you and Happy New Year to All!  Paine Ellsworth  ^put'r there  12:43, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

I think this is a really notable subject if an anyone can help with Karate in the United States I would be really grateful. Dwanyewest (talk) 01:49, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

I've proposed Bi-State Optical Network for deletion. If anyone objects, please remove the tag (and hopefully improve the article). Happy editing! Ajpolino (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Was wondering if some more editors would take a look at the newly added Saudi Arabia–United States relations#Media reception. Such a section might actually have value the article, but this version seems a bit WP:UNDUE and maybe even WP:PROMOTIONAL by emphasizing a single book/author, neither of which seem to meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:NBOOK -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:31, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

I have started an RfC on splitting Federal Correctional Institution, Coleman at Talk:Federal Correctional Institution, Coleman. Safiel (talk) 18:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello! My name is Colman2000, and I just joined WikiProject United States a few days ago. As a proud citizen of the United States, I know a thing or two about all 50 states in our wonderful nation, and I cannot wait to start editing! I am so delighted to be a new participant in this fabulous WikiProject, and I would be delighted to assist in any possible manner! If you have any questions, concerns, advice, or want my honest opinion on any edits I can make or edits you make on any articles regarding the United States, please do not hesitate to leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for reading this message, and I am thrilled to be a part of this WikiProject! Colman2000 (talk) 02:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Welcome! Knope7 (talk) 01:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Should the article High Point High School include a map of the school's attendance boundary (meaning the area which the school draws its students)? This RFC is applicable to most US and Canadian public schools, which draw students from particular catchment areas.

See the thread: Talk:High_Point_High_School#RfC_about_including_a_map_of_the_school's_attendance_boundary WhisperToMe (talk) 05:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Data USA has contributed several hundred SVG data visualizations for use on Wikimedia projects. Please help by categorizing these images, adding them to relevant Wikipedia articles, and reporting any errors or issues at Commons talk:Data USA. More info can be found at Commmons:Data USA. Here are a few examples:

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

The full set of images can be seen at commons:Category:Media contributed by Data USA. If you have specific requests for more data visualizations from Data USA, please contact me on my talk page. Kaldari (talk) 21:38, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Hoping somebody can help me sort this out. Billy J. Williams was appointed by President Obama in 2015 [2] and is still serving as U.S. Attorney for the District of Oregon. But he's not named by The New York Times [3] as having been retained by President Trump, nor is he listed at 2017 dismissal of U.S. attorneys. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:21, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

The U. S. Dept of Justice website still lists him as serving in that role. 1 — Maile (talk) 22:44, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Yes, he just held a conference in Portland. And I added to the Williams bio this Associated Press citation also stating he was retained/re-appointed. But why does the NY Times say all the US Attorneys resigned? And our article 2017 dismissal of U.S. attorneys says "The other 47 U.S. Attorney posts were either already vacant by the end of Obama's administration or the incumbent U.S. Attorney had resigned at the beginning of Trump's administration". This doesn't add up -- did everybody just miss the fact that Williams was retained? ☆ Bri (talk) 22:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Well, somebody's off somewhere. — Maile (talk) 23:40, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

"In March, Williams wasn't among the 46 prosecutors whose resignations were requested by Sessions. Sessions' request applied to presidential appointees. Williams wasn't appointed by President Barack Obama." [4] I'll note also that you assumed from this source that Obama appointed him, even though the article doesn't say that. [5] :-) Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 23:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Aha! Thanks Ed it all is clear now. If only I'd read to the end of the 11/17 thing in The Oregonian. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

I was surprised at the lack of an article on this political term, so made a stub. It was a common term during the Civil Rights Movement, for Southern authorities to allege that local African-Americans didn't actually want to protest or change things, but that the impetus was being driven by Northern white radicals coming down to stir up trouble. If anyone else finds the term and history interesting, the stub could use expansion. MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Members of this WikiProject might be interested in Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Lady Gaga. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

A move discussion which may be of interest to participants of this WikiProject is currently taking place at Talk:Corvette (disambiguation)#Requested move 9 February 2018. Dohn joe (talk) 18:14, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Project members are invited to help expand 2018 United States gun violence protests. Thanks, ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:28, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

An RfC relevant to this project may be interested in has been opened at

• Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Coverage of mass shootings in firearms articles

Interested editors are invited to participate. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

I've started a stub for 2018 West Virginia teachers' strike. If you can help expand it, that would be appreciated.--TM 16:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

A few more editors are needed to complete the A-Class review for Helicopter 66; please stop by and help review the article! Thanks! AustralianRupert (talk) 09:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Last night, I began work on List of battleships of the United States Navy and spent a couple hours on my overhaul of the list, which was reverted. In the notice of that reversion on the talk page, it was suggested that I post notices on pertinent WikiProjects to review my edit. Please follow this link to that talk page to discuss and review my work, its the second-most recent edit as of the writing of this notice. –Vami_IV✠ 19:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

The article Arlington's Great Meadows nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Arlington's Great Meadows for things which need to be addressed.

I'm posting this notice here because this article is covered under WikiProject United States, but the nominator has not been active on Wikipedia for two months. epicgenius (talk) 22:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Template:Public art in Washington, D.C. has been nominated for merging with Template:Public art in the United States. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --Another Believer _(Talk) 14:01, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Asian Americans#Lead section . RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 09:24, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that Environment of the United States, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 19 March 2018 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

Should material stating the NRA operates gun safety and training programs be included in the NRA article [[6]]? Springee (talk) 01:55, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Would a Spanish Filipino who immigrate to the United States be considered Spanish Americans or Filipino Americans or both? I ask due to this edit done by AuH2ORepublican (talk · contribs). I believe the editor means well, but would like to know whether the edit has consensus of interested Wikiprojects. I am just unsure myself, but unsure enough to ask whether Joaquín Miguel Elizalde would be categorized under what ethnicity.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 06:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

For all practical matters, a Spanish Filipino (of 100% Spanish stock) who emigrated to the United States would be classified however he wished to be classified. If he said that because he was Filipino he wanted to be deemed an Asian, then he likely would be deemed to be an Asian. And given that Hispanic is an ethnicity, not a race, and that Hispanics may be of any race (because of widespread African slavery in much of Latin America, many Hispanics are black, although the Congressional Black Caucus refuses to accept it for political reasons), it certainly would not be an impediment for such person to be deemed both Asian and Hispanic (as are, for example, Japanese Peruvians who emigrate to the U.S.). The only example of which I can think of the U.S. government of this day and age not accepting a person’s self-classification in a racial group would be if a white South African (or other African of pure European stock) claimed to be an African American, since such term has a very different connotation in America.

That being said, in the context of a list of Asian and Pacific Islands Americans in Congress, such person’s racial background, not his place of birth, should be paramount, because “Asian” and “Pacific Islander” are racial classifications. Descendants of natives of the Hawaiian Islands are Pacific Islanders, but descendants of Europeans or of European-Americans aren’t, even if both their parents were born and raised in Hawaii. Similarly, someone with four Spanish grandparents is not Asian even if he (and one of his parents) was born and raised in the Philippines. That’s the reason why I followed the Hawaiian precedent and removed Joaquín Manuel Elizalde from the list of Asian and Pacific Islands Americans in Congress. Now, if the editing community reaches a consensus that he should be included because “all Filipinos are, ipso facto, Asian,” then they can add him back in, but I warn them that they would have a hard time distinguishing Elizalde’s case from that of every single congressman who was born and raised in Hawaii (including not only a dozen or so white guys, but also former Illinois Senator Barack Obama). AuH2ORepublican (talk) 06:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Near the top of this Talk page, there is an information box that reads as follows:

"Looking for Wikipedia talk: WikiProject United States in the Spanish Wikipedia? See... ¿Buscando por el discusión del Wikiproyecto Estados Unidos en la Wikipedia en español? Véase... es:Wikiproyecto Discusión:Estados Unidos."

The Spanish-language translation of the initial sentence is incorrect, and appears to have been done using a direct translation of each word instead of a translation of the sentence as a whole. "Looking for" should be translated as "buscando," not as "buscando por," and "discusión" is a feminine noun. The correct translation is "¿Buscando la discusión del Wikiproyecto Estados Unidos en la Wikipedia en español?" Does someone know how to fix that? I would fix it myself, but those information boxes cannot be edited from the Talk page. Cheers, AuH2ORepublican (talk) 18:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Done. Cheers, --Xabier Armendaritz^(talk) 22:15, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Muchas gracias. : ) AuH2ORepublican (talk) 22:19, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi all. :-)

I am looking at drafts in a somewhat random fashion, not having established my strong topic areas at Wikipedia yet. In one draft, Draft:ZOOM+Care, the author appears respond to comments well, but for me the article context is rather unclear and confusing. I.e. while reading the draft I am very surprised to find that patients visit of a physical assistant required some legislation changes which the 'Zoom+Care' company allegedly did (first paragraph of 'Legal Initiatives'). In some places in Australia this is a very basic process, if people come to a doctor but doctors are too busy then the patient may be offered to see a nurse. How does the US really do this? I would find this on the Internet, but I think that it is outside of my strong knowledge area, meaning I would have difficulty using the correct keywords to obtain this information. Your assistance with clarifying the context for this draft would be appreciated.

--Gryllida (talk) 00:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Fictional American people of Irish descent, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion, along with 7 similar categories. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

I've started WP:Good article reassessment/Roseanne Barr/1 and welcome input from others. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

The 420 Collaboration to create and improve cannabis-related content runs through the month of April. WikiProject members are invited to participate. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:41, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

I created a new tool for generating color-coded SVG maps of the United States: http://tools.wmflabs.org/svg-map-maker/. Hope you like it! Kaldari (talk) 23:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebastiantemple (talk • contribs) 11:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

(1) Section 2.2 History of interim U.S. Attorney appointments quotes Senator Feinstein's 2007 statement. HOWEVER, US Senate did something that year. See

An Investigation into the Removal of Nine U.S. Attorneys in 2006. Office of Inspector General and Office of Professional Responsibility, US Department of Justice, September 2008, at page 8 https://justice.gov/opr/us-att-firings-rpt092308.pdf ("At the request of the Department [of Justice], Congress enacted amendments to the USA Patriot Act in March 2006 which eliminated the district court from the process, removed the 120-day time limit, and permitted the Interim U.S. Attorney appointed by the Attorney General to serve until a Presidentially appointed U.S. Attorney was confirmed. See 28 U.S.C. § 546; Pub.L. 109-177, § 502. As discussed in Chapter Three, in response to the events described in this report [firing of 9 US attorneys], in June 2007 Congress repealed this amendment. Therefore, according to 28 U.S.C. § 546, an Interim U.S. Attorney appointed by the Attorney General may serve up to 120 days or until the confirmation of a Presidentially appointed U.S. Attorney. If an Interim U.S. Attorney appointment expires before a Presidentially appointed U.S. Attorney is confirmed, the federal district court for that district appoints an Interim U.S. Attorney to serve until the vacancy is filled.")

(2) Appointment of a acting or interim US attorney is under (a) Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 Codified as 5 United States Code sections 3345 to 3349a, 3349b, 3349C and 3349d. (b) 28 USC section 546.

My email is chi2flu@gmail.com, and I do not intend to write/rewrite/delete section 2.2 myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Friedrich Lu (talk • contribs) 19:33, 11 April 2018 (UTC)